Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
7.1 Discussion of changes to Dog Ordinancer �7-INk,
SCANDIA
Staff Report
Date of Meeting: June 7, 2017
To: City Council
From: Neil Soltis, Administrator
Re: Dog Ordinance
Background: Based on a previous City Council discussion regarding the dog ordinance, a draft of an
updated ordinance regulating dong in the City is being submitted for comment.
The primary issue is the severity of the penalty for having their dog running outside of their property
and presumably "at large".
Under the current ordinance the penalty for a dog not being registered or having a rabies vaccination is
a petty misdemeanor which is similar in nature to a parking ticket that can be paid without a court
appearance. The penalty for a dog being "at large" is a misdemeanor which is a crime and which
requires a pre-trial conference with the City Attorney and then a possible court appearance. The
distinction between the terms from MN Statutes is provided below:
Subd. 3.Misdemeanor.
"Misdemeanor" means a crime for which a sentence of not more than 90 days or a fine of not
more than $1,000, or both, may be imposed.
Subd. 4a.Petty misdemeanor.
"Petty misdemeanor" means a petty offense which is prohibited by statute, which does not
constitute a crime and for which a sentence of a fine of not more than $300 may be imposed.
The following are excerpts from the current dog ordinance:
Section 1. DEFINITIONS:
At Large: A dog shall be termed to be at large when it is not under "restraint" as defined in this
section.
Restraint: A dog is under restraint within the meaning of this section if it is controlled by a leash not
exceeding six (6) feet in length; if it is under the voice or signal command of a responsible person
whom the dog will immediately obey; if it is within a vehicle being driven or parked on the public
streets; and if it is within the limits of its owner's premises.
Section 20. PENALTIES:
A. Any person who shall violate sections 2 or 3 of this Ordinance shall be guilty of a
petty misdemeanor.
B. Any person who shall violate any of the terms and provisions of Sections 4, 5, 6, 7,
15A, 15D, 15E, and 18 of this Ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. In
addition, after a finding of a court of proper jurisdiction that a dog is a public
nuisance as defined in Section 6, the Court may order that the dog be destroyed or
that the owner or custodian remove it from the City or keep it confined in a
designated place.
C. It is a misdemeanor to remove a microchip from a dangerous or potentially
dangerous dog, to fail to renew the registration of a dangerous dog, to fail to account
for a dangerous dog's death or change of location where the dog will reside, to sign a
false affidavit with respect to a dangerous dog's death or change of location where
the dog will reside, or to fail to disclose ownership of a dangerous dog to a property
owner from whom the person rents property.
D. A person who is convicted of a second or subsequent violation of Sections 15A, 15D
or 15E is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
OFFENSES THAT ARE PETTY MISDEMEANORS
Section 2. IDENTIFICATION: No person shall own, harbor, keep or have custody of a dog over
six (6) months of age, within this City, without the dog being identified by a device,
tag or plate attached to the dog by a collar, harness or device giving the name and
telephone number of the current owner.
Section 3. RABIES VACCINATION: No person shall own, harbor, keep or have custody of a dog
over six (6) months of age, within this City, unless the dog has a current vaccination
against rabies and the dog has attached to its collar, harness or similar device a
current rabies vaccination tag.
OFFENSES THAT ARE MISDEMEANDORS
Section 4. CONFINEMENT: The owner shall confine within a building or secure enclosure any
fierce, dangerous or vicious dog, except when under restraint by a responsible
person. Every female dog in heat shall be confined in a building, secure enclosure,
veterinary hospital, or boarding kennel, or shall be controlled on a leash while being
exercised.
Section 5. AT LARGE: No owner shall permit the owner's dog to be at large within the City.
Section 6. PUBLIC NUISANCE: No person shall keep or harbor a dog which is a public nuisance.
A dog is a public nuisance that does any of the following:
A. Destroys property or habitually trespasses in a damaging manner on property of
persons other than the owner.
B. Attacks or bites a person outside the owner's or custodian's premises.
C. Shows vicious habits or molests pedestrians or persons riding or driving on the public
streets or highways.
D. Habitually barks, bays, cries, howls, or makes any other noise continuously for a
period of 10 minutes or barks intermittently for 30 minutes or more, at any time,
either day or night. A dog shall not be deemed a public nuisance if, at the time the
dog is barking or making any other noise, a person is trespassing or threatening to
trespass upon the private property on which the dog is situated or when the dog is
teased or provoked.
Section 7. POISONING OF ANIMALS: It shall be unlawful for anyone to place upon the ground or
in any other place, any poison, bait or other material intended to harm a dog.
\Under the current ordinance a dog that is on a leash that is over 6' in length or a dog wearing a shock
training collar under the owners control is presumed to be "at large" with the owner subject to a
misdemeanor citation.
Issue:
Should the definition of an "at large" dog be modified?
Should having a dog being "at large" be classified as a misdemeanor?
A draft ordinance with language clarifying the definition of an "at large" dog and reclassifying the
penalty for an "at large" dog are provided for discussion.