No preview available
8.g Administrator's report Staff Report Date of Meeting: February 20, 2018 To: City Council From: Neil Soltis, Administrator Re: Administrator’s report Fire Contract with May Township – The Washington County Dispatch has provided a listing of May township addresses that are served by the Scandia Fire Department. The May Township Planner is working to merge this listing with the County valuation information to determine the valuation of structures and the number of households in May Township that are served by the Scandia Fire Department. Animal Control and Animal Impound – Based on the referral by Councilmember Schneider, I’ve contacted Rivertown Animal Hospital in Stillwater. Based on the discussion Rivertown can handle overnight boarding but cannot handle long-term boarding. Their staff is will follow-up to confirm the extent to which they can provide impound services. I have been in contact with Northwoods Animal Shelter in Wyoming and the Director will be discussion with their board whether they can accommodate the small number of dogs that the City takes to an impound facility each year. Northwoods currently is the impound facility used by the City of Wyoming and the Lakes Area Police Departments. GreenStep Cities program –In 2015 the Council passed a resolution to join the Green Step program specified that the City take actions to claim credit for having implemented best practices and to work at its own pace toward implementing any GreenStep best practices that will result in energy use reduction, economic savings, quality of life improvement, reduction in the City’s greenhouse gas footprint, and recognition by the League of Minnesota Cities as a Step Two GreenStep City. Based on the actions taken by the City both before and after the recognition, the City has implemented a sufficient number of best practices to be achieve the Step 2 recognition. The City will be recognized for its efforts at the League of Municipalities Conference. As a GreenStep City, we are eligible to receive 1 GreenStep sign that can be installed on the MnDOT signs at an entrance to the City. Additional signs are available for purchase. Through the GreenStep Cities program City businesses have access to the Minnesota Retiree Environmental Technical Assistance Program (RETAP). RETAP will perform no-cost, non- regulatory energy efficiency and waste reduction assessments to Minnesota's small businesses and public and private institutions. Assessments include an on-site visit from a team of RETAP members with emphasis on finding opportunities to increase energy efficiency and water conservation, reduce waste, and reduce operating costs. A description of the program and a link to the RETAP website are now on the EDA Resources and Tools Page. Scandia Lions donation – The Lions Foundation has received a $2,000 donation to make entrances to the Community building handicap accessible. Adam Hawkinson is working with a contract on obtaining cost information for the project. In 2010 the City applied for, but was not awarded, a Help America Votes grant for similar upgrades. There are no such grants currently available. LED lighting project – The work on the conversion of lighting at the Community Building and parking lot is complete. In future reports I will provide updates on the energy savings. As a reminder any savings in electrical costs will be transferred to the Capital Project Fund to repay the cost of the project. Big Marine Lake - Michael Blehert of the Big Marine Lakes Association sent an email extending his thanks to the Council for the letter of support. Goose Lake (Olinda Lane) lot – I’ve contact Richard Koons, an appraiser recommended by Chase Peloquin, regarding appraising the Goose Lake lot. The appraisal is expected to be completed within a month a month and once completed I will add a discussion regarding the sale of the lot to the next work session agenda. Lakes Area Television – I met with Paul Pederson of LATV regarding the relationship after the City’s withdrawal from the Forest Lake Cable Commission on June 30, 2018. LATV would like the City to continue to provide accounting services for LATV. Colleen has compiled an estimate of her time on a monthly basis to handle the accounting and the payment from LATV more than covers her cost. Paul will also be preparing a schedule of charges for LATV to continue to film the City Council and Planning Commission meetings. A discussion of the City’s relationship with LATV will be on a future Council work session. Frontier Internet upgrades – The upgrades are all turned up for 2017 and the sales office in Lindstrom can provide information on the availability of increased speeds and the cost to upgrade. By mid-year Frontier will be marketing their Vantage product that will provide cable- type programming to those customers that they can supply at least 18mbs download speed. Frontier will be working with Lakes Area TV to ensure that the PEG channel appears on the Vantage product. The 2018 Connect America Fund projects will be concentrated in the northeast area of the City. Those upgrades are scheduled for summer 2018 const ruction. Washington County CDA – The CDA is presenting for County Board approval a Predevelopment Grant Fund. The program is targeted to start March 1 and will provide matching funds to Cities for project predevelopment costs. Grants under $10,000 will require a 20% match and grants between $10,000- and $40,000 will require a 50% match. In 2017 the CDA funded access to the Open to Business program. A recap of the first 6 month of activity in Washington County follows this report. Significant is the 6 Scandia clients have received services. Washington County – Copies of the County 2018 Legislative priorities and a summary of the County 2040 Comprehensive Plan follow this report. Wetland Conservation Act reporting – The City contracts with the Washington Conservation District to provide technical services related to the administration of the Wetland Conservation Act. A copy of the 2017 report to the Minnesota Bureau of Water and Soil Resources submitted on the City’s behalf by Jay Riggs follows this report. Preliminary 2017 Financials – Based on the information sent to the auditor in preparations for their work on the audit, the year-end fund balance in the City’s General Fund decreased from at 12/31/2016 $1,772,274 to $1,698.885. The budgeted year-end 2017 balance was $1,258,774. The increase over the budget is largely due to building permit fees that were $264,000 over budget and expenditures $142,000 under budget. A summary is provided below. The 2018 budget provides for a transfer of the excess fund balance of $400,000 to the Ca pital Improvement Fund. 1 Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Conservation Act 2017 Annual Reporting Form Use the tab key to navigate between fields. Local Government Unit (LGU): Scandia Organization Type: City County (or Counties if WMO) Washington Name of Person Completing Report: Jay Riggs Title: District Manager Contact Phone #: 651-330-8220 #20 Your Employer Name (if submitting report on behalf of an LGU): Washington Conservation District Does your LGU receive WCA funding from the Natural Resources Block Grant (NRBG)? No NOTE: Completion of this report is required for all WCA LGUs. It must be received by the BWSR St. Paul office on or before February 1, 2018. See the accompanying instructions for details. 1. Number of landowner contacts in which wetland related technical assistance was provided during the calendar year: 20 (Please provide your best estimate.) 2. Number of applications that were: Type of Application: # Approved # Denied # Withdrawn A. Boundary or Type 7 0 0 B. No-Loss 1 0 0 C. Exemption 1 0 0 D. Sequencing 0 0 0 E. Replacement Plan* 0 1 0 *Do not include local road authority notifications for projects that qualify for replacement under the BWSR Local Government Roads Wetland Replacement Program according to MN Rule 8420.0544. 3. Number of exemptions approved and square feet of wetland impact for each category from MN Rule 8420.0420 (provide best estimate for impacts that are not easily quantified): Type of Exemption: Number of Approved Exemptions Sq. Ft. of Wetland Permanently Impacted Subp. 2. Agricultural Activities 0 0.00 Subp. 3. Drainage 1 1300 Subp. 4. Federal approvals 0 0.00 Subp. 5. Restored wetlands 0 0.00 Subp. 6. Utilities 0 0.00 Subp. 7. Forestry 0 0.00 Subp. 8. De minimis 0 0.00 Subp. 9. Wildlife habitat 0 0.00 Subp. 2g. Agricultural wetland bank exemption* 0 0.00 *See WCA reporting instructions. 2 4. Number of replacement plans approved that replace impacts by the following methods: A. Wetland Banking: 0 B. Project-Specific Replacement: 0 C. Combination of Wetland Banking and Project-Specific Replacement: 0 5. Square feet of wetland to be impacted via an approved replacement plan: 0 6. For approved replacement plans, list project-specific replacement only* in square feet and corresponding credit amounts as approved in the following categories from MN Rule 8420.0526: Action Eligible for Credit: Square Feet Repl. Credit Subp. 2. Upland buffer areas. 0 0.00 Subp. 3. Restoration of completely drained or filled wetland areas. 0 0.00 Subp. 4. Restoration of partially drained or filled wetland areas. 0 0.00 Subp. 5. Vegetative restoration of farmed wetlands. 0 0.00 Subp. 6. Protection of wetlands previously restored via conservation easements. 0 0.00 Subp. 7. Wetland creations. 0 0.00 Subp. 8. Restoration and protection of exceptional natural resource value. 0 0.00 Subp. 9. Preservation of wetlands 0 0.00 *For question 6, report project-specific replacement only. Replacement via banking is accounted for via BWSR’s banking database. 7. For project-specific replacement wetlands, list the number of each completed or received: A. Construction Sites Inspected B. Corrective Actions Ordered C. Monitoring Reports Received D. Findings of Satisfactory Replacement 0 0 0 0 8. Number of potential WCA violation sites investigated: 6 9. Number of enforcement actions that were taken under local ordinances and/or that did not result in DNR- issued cease and desist, restoration, or replacement orders (including informal resolution of violations): 1 10. Number of local appeals heard: Appeal in 2018 11. Does the LGU have a MN WDCP certified delineator available (excluding BWSR or SWCD)? On staff: ☐ On call (i.e. consultant): ☒ Not at all: ☐ 12. Optional: Please provide information regarding unusual circumstances, time spent on enforcement or major violations, banking application reviews, known exempt activity for which a formal decision was not made, additional detail or clarification of above data, or any other information or comments you would like to share. The Washington Conservation District provides technical and administrative support to Scandia for its implementation of the Wetland Conservation Act. 3 13. For LGU staff responsible for implementing WCA, please provide the following for WCA/wetland training attended this reporting year (attach additional if necessary). The University of Minnesota Wetland Delineator Certification Program webpage has a list of pre-approved continuing education programs offered in 2017. Please indicate training session in full days or indicate the number of actual hours. Session Title Training Sponsor Employee Name Employee Title From Date To Date Total # of Days Total # of Hours Use format m/d/yyyy 1 Wetland Delineation Course BWSR BWSR Jay Riggs Manager 6/12/2017 6/16/2017 5 40 2 BWSR Academy BWSR Jay Riggs Manager 11/1/2017 11/2/2017 2 8 3 Session Title Training Sponsor Employee Name Employee Title m/d/yyyy m/d/yyyy # Days # Hours 4 Session Title Training Sponsor Employee Name Employee Title m/d/yyyy m/d/yyyy # Days # Hours 5 Session Title Training Sponsor Employee Name Employee Title m/d/yyyy m/d/yyyy # Days # Hours 6 Session Title Training Sponsor Employee Name Employee Title m/d/yyyy m/d/yyyy # Days # Hours 7 Session Title Training Sponsor Employee Name Employee Title m/d/yyyy m/d/yyyy # Days # Hours 8 Session Title Training Sponsor Employee Name Employee Title m/d/yyyy m/d/yyyy # Days # Hours 9 Session Title Training Sponsor Employee Name Employee Title m/d/yyyy m/d/yyyy # Days # Hours 10 Session Title Training Sponsor Employee Name Employee Title m/d/yyyy m/d/yyyy # Days # Hours 11 Session Title Training Sponsor Employee Name Employee Title m/d/yyyy m/d/yyyy # Days # Hours 12 Session Title Training Sponsor Employee Name Employee Title m/d/yyyy m/d/yyyy # Days # Hours 13 Session Title Training Sponsor Employee Name Employee Title m/d/yyyy m/d/yyyy # Days # Hours 14 Session Title Training Sponsor Employee Name Employee Title m/d/yyyy m/d/yyyy # Days # Hours 15 Session Title Training Sponsor Employee Name Employee Title m/d/yyyy m/d/yyyy # Days # Hours 16 Session Title Training Sponsor Employee Name Employee Title m/d/yyyy m/d/yyyy # Days # Hours 17 Session Title Training Sponsor Employee Name Employee Title m/d/yyyy m/d/yyyy # Days # Hours 18 Session Title Training Sponsor Employee Name Employee Title m/d/yyyy m/d/yyyy # Days # Hours 19 Session Title Training Sponsor Employee Name Employee Title m/d/yyyy m/d/yyyy # Days # Hours 20 Session Title Training Sponsor Employee Name Employee Title m/d/yyyy m/d/yyyy # Days # Hours 21 Session Title Training Sponsor Employee Name Employee Title m/d/yyyy m/d/yyyy # Days # Hours 22 Session Title Training Sponsor Employee Name Employee Title m/d/yyyy m/d/yyyy # Days # Hours 23 Session Title Training Sponsor Employee Name Employee Title m/d/yyyy m/d/yyyy # Days # Hours 24 Session Title Training Sponsor Employee Name Employee Title m/d/yyyy m/d/yyyy # Days # Hours 25 Session Title Training Sponsor Employee Name Employee Title m/d/yyyy m/d/yyyy # Days # Hours 4 Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Conservation Act 2017 Annual Reporting - Instructions Requirement Annual reporting of Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) implementation activities is required for all of Minnesota’s WCA local government units (LGUs) in accordance with MN Rule 8420.0200, Subp. 2, Item I. This reporting requirement applies regardless of whether or not the LGU obtains any WCA funding from BWSR. LGU activities in some locales are tracked and reported by one entity (i.e. SWCD, County, Watershed District) for several LGUs. A separate form must be submitted for each individual LGU. LGU’s who receive assistance in implementing WCA from a County, SWCD, or Watershed District need to coordinate with them to ensure accurate and complete information is submitted. If you are expecting another entity to report on your behalf, confirm with that entity that they are reporting on your behalf and ask for a copy of their reporting form to document compliance with WCA rule. 1) Complete and save the form to your computer/network (do not convert to .pdf or other format). Retain the form for future reference or needed corrections. 2) E-mail the completed form to WCA_Reporting@state.mn.us to be received by BWSR no later than February 1, 2018. The “sent” date of the e-mail will be used to track the date of receipt. Use your LGU name as the subject line of the e-mail. Note: Only send completed reporting forms to this address. Do not direct questions or other correspondence to this email address, instead contact your BWSR wetland specialist. 3) Your Wetland Specialist will review the data and may contact you with questions or possible corrections. Relationship to Natural Resources Block Grant (NRBG) Completion and submittal of this form is required of all LGUs regardless of whether or not NRBG funding is provided. However, it is also a condition of the grant for those LGUs who receive NRBG funding. LGUs who fail to submit the form will not receive NRBG grant funds. For those local governments that receive NRBG WCA funding and distribute it to multiple LGUs, each LGU for which NRBG WCA funds have been transferred should be listed in the NRBG eLINK report. The local government must also ensure that each LGU for which NRBG WCA funds have been transferred submits a separate reporting form according to the instructions above. Timeframe and Context In general, the data provided should be based on WCA activities for which the LGU has issued a final decision, application withdrawn, or issue resolved during the 2017 calendar year (see question 1 guidance for exception). The approved activities need not have been implemented in order to be reported. Projects still under review but not approved by the LGU at the end of the calendar year should not be reported until the year in which a decision has been made or they are otherwise resolved. Question-Specific Guidance The following guidance items are numbered to correspond to the numbered items in the reporting form: 1. The purpose of this question is to gather information on LGU workload. Landowner is a general term meant to include agents, consultants, and developers that are proposing or contemplating projects regardless of their legal ownership of the land. In addition to landowners for which WCA applications were processed during the calendar year, LGUs should report the number of landowner contacts for which they answered questions related to wetlands or WCA, provided preliminary review of projects potentially affecting wetlands, provided advice on wetland boundaries or exemption applicability, or other landowner consultation related to WCA or wetland. Meeting with one landowner four times on the same project would count as four landowner contacts for the purpose of answering this question. Newsletters or other such general correspondence do not constitute technical assistance provided to a landowner. Please provide your best estimate. 5 2. For purposes of this question, “withdrawn” means that the applicant has submitted an application but withdrew it prior to the LGU making a formal decision. Replacement plans (Item 2E) do not include local road authority notifications for projects that qualify for replacement under the BWSR Local Government Roads Wetland Replacement Program (road program) according to MN Rule 8420.0544. These notifications are reported separately and accounted for in BWSR’s road program tracking database. However, non-qualifying road projects completed under a replacement plan (or a combination of banking/project-specific and the BWSR road program) should be reported here. 3. The purpose of this question is to gather data on the amount of wetland lost due to approved exemptions and the frequency of exemption use. The exemptions are organized consistent with the WCA rule order. LGUs should only report exempt impacts for which a decision has been made to approve the exempt impacts. Known wetland impacts due to exemptions for which the LGU has not formally made a decision can be reported under question 13. Report impacts in square feet. Please note the addition of Subp. 2G Agricultural wetland bank exemption. This exemption has been separated from the others because the impacts are being replaced, and not permanently lost. Regardless, the amount of wetland impacted under this exemption should be reported. LGUs should only report the square feet of wetland permanently lost due to exempt activity. For example, true drainage maintenance in accordance with MN Rule 8420.0420, Subpart 3, Item B generally does not require reporting. Reporting temporary impacts each time the ditch or tile is maintained can lead to multiple reporting of impacts to the same square feet over time, which is misleading and skews the resulting data. However, exempt wetland impacts due to new ditches or tile lines, existing drainage that has been improved, or deposition of spoil in wetland areas beyond the existing square feet of deposition must be reported. Wetlands drained under Item C of the drainage exemption will almost always require reporting. Check your work to ensure it is correct – the total number of approved exemptions in #3 should equal the sum of approved exemptions in #2. The only exception is when a true drainage maintenance project is not reported in question #3 per the above paragraph. 4. Item A is NOT referring to wetland banking applications, but rather replacement plans that utilize bank credits for replacement. Check your work - the sum of A+B+C should equal the number of replacement plans approved under question #2E. 5. The purpose of this question is to collect data on the quantity of wetland in square feet lost under approved replacement plans. LGUs should sum the number of square feet of approved wetland impact (drainage, fill, or regulated excavation) that require replacement. Report total wetland impacts in square feet. Do not include square feet of wetland impact that do not require replacement by WCA (such as exempt or no-loss activities). 6. Report the total square feet of replacement and the corresponding number of approved credits, remember acres do not always equal credits, associated with each action eligible for credit in MN Rule 8420.0526 (the actions are organized consistent with the WCA rule order). This item pertains to project specific replacement under approved replacement plans only – do not report credit approved under a banking plan or a replacement plan using banking credits. Example: If an application was approved to restore a 435,600 sq. ft. (10-acres) of partially drained wetland at 50% credit, and 348,480 sq. ft. (8 acres) of upland buffer at 25% credit, the LGU would report the following: 1) 435,600 sq. ft. (10 acres) under the “square feet” column, and since it is at 50% credit (10*.0.5) = 5 credits under the “Repl. Credit” column for restoration of partially drained or filled wetland areas, and The total number of Replacement Plans approved (question 2E) must equal the total Replacement Plans Approved under question 4. The number of Exemptions Approved (question 2C) should equal the Total Number of Approved Exemptions under question 3. 6 2) 348,480 sq. ft. (8 acres) under the “square feet” column, and since it is at 25% credit (8*0.25) = 2 credits under the “Repl. Credit” column for upland buffer areas. 7. The purpose of this question is to gather data on replacement monitoring compliance and track LGU oversight of replacement plan projects. Note that “construction sites inspected” and “corrective actions ordered” are specific to project specific replacement wetlands only. Note: LGUs should be tracking all approved replacement sites and comparing them with actual monitoring reports received in order to identify issues of non-compliance. 8. This question is related to LGU workload associated with enforcement activities that may or may not get reflected in formal actions or decisions. For this question, LGUs should report potential WCA violation site inspections regardless of what initiated the inspection (DNR enforcement flight, landowner complaint, found by LGU, etc.) or the end result (no violation, cease and desist, restoration order, resolved locally, etc.). This should include site inspections performed by the SWCD separately from the LGU, however, care should be taken not to duplicate numbers. Site investigations resulting from DNR-submitted Resource Protection Notice “RPNs” should also be included in this item. 9. This question is intended to collect data on those instances where the LGU resolves violations informally, through local channels, or through an enforcement order issued by a non-DNR enforcement officer (i.e. a deputy sheriff). Violations that result in the issuance of an order by a DNR enforcement officer should not be reported because that information will be obtained directly from the DNR. 10. Do not include appeals to BWSR. 11. The exclusion of the SWCD in this question is not applicable if the SWCD is the delegated LGU responsible for making final WCA decisions. 12. This is your chance to report anything you feel is relevant or important that may not be captured in other questions. Please attempt to limit this information to the maximum 2,500 characters, however, if you have additional relevant information, provide it on a separate document and attach it to the e-mail. 13. LGUs should only report training related to WCA administration and relevant wetland science. For example, attending forums or seminars related to wetland delineation, wetland functional assessment, replacement wetland design, and WCA administration should be listed. Attending a seminar on designing wetlands to treat sanitary waste would generally not be applicable because it is not associated with aspects of WCA. Differences due to implementation of an approved Comprehensive Wetland Protection and Management Plan should be reported on a separate document generated by the LGU. Contact your BWSR Wetland Specialist with any questions regarding completion of the reporting form.