Loading...
09.b2 Reinhardt Variance - CC Packet1 | P a g e Date of Meeting: September 19, 2023 To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: TJ Hofer, Consultant City Planner Frannie Nielsen, Consultant Planner Re: Variance for 18884 Layton Avenue North for Wetland Setback Applicant: Joseph and Katherine Reinhardt Zoning: RR-N and Shoreland Overlay Owner: Joseph and Katherine Reinhardt Future Land Use: Rural Mixed Use Location: PID 3103220110026, 3103220110025, 3103220110024, 3103220110038, 3103220110039 Review Deadline November 15, 2023 The applicants are seeking an after-the-fact variance from the required wetland setbacks for a driveway that they constructed on their property to gain access from Langly Avenue to the rear portion of the property. The driveway was constructed through a protected wetland, and the applicants did not seek or receive a driveway, land alteration, or wetland permit prior to the driveway construction. The property already has an existing driveway to serve the property from Layton Avenue. BACKGROUND The property consists of five parcels that include 1.38 acres and is zoned Rural Residential Neighborhood and is within the Shoreland Overlay Management District of Big Marine Lake, a Recreational Development Lake. The applicants requested and were granted the same variance in October of 2018, but the variance expired without the variance being recorded and the conditions of approval were not met. Since the granting of the variance in 2018, the Scandia Engineering Standards have been 2 | P a g e updated and adopted. Current engineering standards state the following in reference to single family residential entrances: one access per Residential Property unless additional access approved by City. The variance was granted subject to five conditions of approval including the following: 1. The applicants shall combine the five parcels (PIDS 3103220110026, 3103220110025, 3103220110024, 3103220110038, 3103220110039) into a single tax parcel no later than December 21, 2018. 2. The applicants shall submit a revised Wetland Replacement Plan under the Wetland Conservation Act pursuant to the restoration order and satisfy all applicable conditions and stipulations. 3. The applicants shall obtain a permit from the Carnelian Marine St. Croix Watershed District and satisfy all applicable conditions and stipulations. 4. The applicants shall obtain driveway, land alteration, and grading permits from the City of Scandia and satisfy all applicable conditions and stipulations. 5. The applicants shall pay all fees and escrows associated with the variance application. In early 2018, the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) for the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) and City Council reviewed the applicants’ request to permit the wetland impacts by approving an after-the-fact wetland replacement plan under the WCA rules. The TEP and City Council found that the applicant’s request could not be justified under the WCA rules. However, the City Council’s decision noted that the WCA rules permit the applicants to seek a variance from the City’s zoning standards to permit the driveway. The applicants are seeking after-the-fact variance approval to permit the driveway where it was constructed. Three of the five parcels have frontage on Layton Avenue, (“Layton parcels") one of the five parcels has frontage on Langly Avenue, and one land locked parcel (“Langly parcels”). Three driveways served the applicants’ parcels prior to 2017, but the applicants can no longer use two of the driveways. The main driveway from Layton Avenue is 75 feet wide and provides access to the garage and storage building. In the past, the applicants used a second driveway from Layton Avenue which was not located on their property to access the septic system and to access exterior storage behind the building. They also occasionally used a third driveway from Langly Avenue that crossed another neighboring property to access the Langly parcels for storage. The applicants did not have formal agreements to use the driveways that were located on the other properties. The owners of the non-applicant properties stopped permitting access through their properties in 2017. The applicants then constructed a new driveway from Langly Avenue to access the Langly parcels in 2017. They constructed the driveway through a protected wetland but did not obtain the required wetland permit or other permits for the driveway construction. The entire southern half of the parcel where the driveway is located is occupied by a wetland. Access to the Langly parcels from Langly is not possible without disturbing the wetland. 3 | P a g e WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT PROCESS AND TEP FINDINGS The applicants’ violation of the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) was reported to and reviewed by the DNR and City. The City serves as the responsible Local Governmental Unit (LGU) for the WCA. The DNR issued a restoration order for the violation. The City found the driveway construction to be a violation of the WCA. The applicants submitted a wetland replacement plan to the City, requesting that the City permit the wetland impacts if they mitigated the impacts through wetland creation in another location. The LGU must review Wetland Replacement Plans to determine if they meet the requirements of WCA. A Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) assists the City with the review of replacement plans. The applicants stated that the driveway was needed, and therefore the City should approve the replacement plan. They stated that the new driveway was needed to access their septic system, storage buildings, and certain areas of the lots abutting Langly Avenue. In the fall of 2017, representatives from the Washington Conservation District (WCD), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and Carnelian-Marine-St. Croix Watershed District (CMSCWD) and the City Administrator met as the TEP to review the after- the-fact wetland replacement application, based on the WCA rules: • When a wetland violation occurs, the WCA may permit the fill and approve a wetland replacement plan if the fill can be justified under the WCA rules through a process called “sequencing." • If the fill cannot be justified based on the rules, then the wetland fill is denied, and the wetland must be restored. (In this case, the driveway would need to be removed and the area that was disturbed would need to be restored, consistent with a Wetland Replacement Order that has been approved by the DNR.) The TEP recommended denial of the application, on the following grounds: (i) the new driveway was not needed to provide access to the property’s septic system; (ii) the new driveway was not needed to provide access to the storage of items on the property; (iii) the applicants did not submit two alternatives as required by the sequencing rules (no action is not an option); and (iv) they deferred to a memo from the City Planner regarding whether the driveway met the Development Code requirements. The Planner’s memo stated that the two Langly parcels could not be sold or developed separate from the Layton parcels, that the City’s Engineering standards permit only one driveway per property, and therefore the driveway did not meet the City’s Code requirements. The applicants appealed the TEP decision to deny the Wetland Replacement Plan Application to the City. The City Council heard the appeal in January 2018, and upheld the denial of the after- the-fact wetland replacement application. The City Council also noted that under WCA, the landowners had a final alternative to try to keep the driveway where it was constructed. They could submit a variance application, including a detailed survey, to request the City consider whether the driveway access from Langly meets the criteria for a variance. 4 | P a g e The applicants applied for a variance from the Development Code requirements to permit a driveway from Langly Avenue. The driveway would need a variance from the wetland setback requirements. The Scandia City Council approved the variance request in October of 2018. The variance expired and the applicants failed to meet the conditions of approval. The applicants are now requesting the same variance as previously approved. In 2003 and 2006, the Township and County granted the previous owner variances to construct the buildings on the parcels, which cross parcel boundaries and do not meet the required setbacks for each parcel. The variance approvals required that the parcels be combined so that the buildings would meet the setback requirements. The City Attorney stated in a separate letter in 2006 that all five parcels should be considered one parcel due to the small size of each parcel and the Code standards for nonconforming parcels. The property owner did not combine the parcels into a single tax parcel as required by the Township and County in 2006. Based on the Shoreland Ordinance and state statute § 462.357 for non-conforming parcels within the shoreland overlay, the five Reinhardt parcels must be considered to be one parcel for purposes of sale or development and must be combined. EVALUATION OF REQUEST Variance Section 153.500.060 Subd. 1 (B) establishes the standards for when the City shall approve a variance. The variance must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, must be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this Chapter, and should only be approved when the strict enforcement of this Chapter would result in practical difficulties with carrying out the strict letter of the Code. Practical difficulties are established within the UDC and are listed below in italics. Staff’s analysis of these is below each practical difficulty: a. The applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Single-family residences are permitted in the Rural Residential Neighborhood District and Shoreland District, and the current single-family residential use is a reasonable use on the parcel. The existing residential use has a functioning access off Layton Avenue North currently. b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. The plight of the landowner is not unique to the parcel and is caused by the landowner. A viable access exists to serve the parcels with frontage on Langley Avenue North that is not limited by the physical characteristics of the property. The property is adequately served by a driveway that does not require a wetland setback variance. 5 | P a g e c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. If the variance were granted, it would not alter the essential character of the locality based on a structural or architectural means, but would impact the natural resources of the area. d. Economic conditions alone shall not constitute practical difficulties. Economic conditions alone are not a factor in the variance. e. May include, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. The variance is not related to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. f. The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets, or increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. The proposed variance will not impair adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets, or increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood g. The requested variance is the minimum action required to eliminate the practical difficulty. Staff does not believe that a practical difficulty exists, and therefore no action is required to eliminate a practical difficulty. The requested variance is not the minimum action required to provide access to the septic system and Langly parcels. There is an access option that would not require a variance or impact wetlands on the property. ANALYSIS Review Comments The submittal was sent to city staff and other regulatory agencies for review and comment. Carnelian-Marine-St. Croix Watershed District The District records indicate that a no-CMSCWD involvement decision from 2018 was pursued because of the required restoration order. The updated understanding is that if the City approves 6 | P a g e a variance to allow the driveway to remain, WCA would move forward with approving an application to purchase banking credits for mitigation, and then the DNR would release its lien. If this sequence is to occur, then the applicant would also need to apply for a CMSCWD Wetland Alteration Permit and pay into the District’s Wetland Restoration at a rate of the total impacted area as it compares to an acres as described by the Watershed. The District would then need the wetland fill amount so the payment amount can be confirmed. Washington Conservation District DNR has already enforced this site by placing a lien on the property. In order to obtain the permit, the applicant will need to resubmit the WCA Wetland Replacement application and fulfill the wetland mitigation requirements. The applicant can use the second application with a minor change noting the variance has been received. Engineering Department The City Engineer provided no comments. Public Works Department The Public Works Director had no comment. Fire Department The Fire Chief had no comment. Washington County Washington County had no comment. Department of Natural Resources The DNR Area Hydrologist provided no comment. Planning Commission The application was reviewed by the Planning Commission at their September 5th, 2023, meeting. The Planning Commission held a public hearing where five residents, including the applicant, spoke. Three commenters expressed concern over the application. The comments raised issues that included storage of vehicles, drainage to the wetland, spillage of fuel, and nuisances in the neighborhood. The applicant discussed the application being amended by staff, contested the presence of the wetland, and discussed the findings by the title company. One commenter asked about the variance procedure and what is allowed within a wetland. The Planning Commission then closed the public hearing. The Planning Commission reviewed the application and discussed the submitted materials and application, how the applicant has been accessing the property on the south side of the existing structure, if conditions of the previous approval were met, and the combination process. 7 | P a g e The Planning Commission moved to recommend denial of the variance. The motion was approved with a vote of 5-0. Staff Analysis Staff finds that the proposed plan is inconsistent with the Unified Development Code (UDC). The Comprehensive Plan prioritizes environmental stewardship and wetland encroachment does not align with the goal of environmental stewardship. The driveway is located within the wetland boundary. The entire southern half of the parcel where the driveway is located is occupied by a wetland. A driveway could not be constructed on this parcel to avoid the wetland. The applicants have applied for the variance with a rationale that the driveway is needed for access to the Langly parcels, and no other access is available to the Langly parcels. Staff finds that there is an alternative, viable access to the Langly parcels on the property at 18884 Layton that would not impact wetlands or wetland buffers; that the finding is consistent with the prior finding of the TEP Panel and Board of Adjustments and Appeals; and that the applicants’ proposed driveway is not consistent due to the wetland impacts that would be needed for its construction. The applicant has not established a practical difficulty that warrants a variance being issued to allow a driveway in a wetland. Staff recognizes that further work on the property may further impact the wetland and that the City Council voted to approve a nearly identical request in 2018. Staff has prepared a draft resolution including findings that support the granting of the variance and conditions for approval in the event that the Planning Commission wishes to recommend approval. After reviewing the application based on the standards of the UDC, there does not appear to be a practical difficulty as there is an alternative access to the south of the existing structure. However, during the review of the 2018 application, the applicant and noted concerns with this location. The removal of mature trees in the area as well as the space limitations was of concern for the applicant. This concern was echoed by members of the Council. If the Council finds that alternative access to the south of the existing house is not a viable alternative, then staff’s recommendation would be to approve the variance, as no viable alternative exists. COMMISSION ACTION The Planning Commission can do one of the following: 1. Recommend approval, with or without conditions, of the attached ordinance and resolutions. 8 | P a g e 2. Recommend denial, with findings, of the attached ordinance and resolutions. 3. Table the request for further review/study. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Commission recommends denial of the proposed variances, subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed use is not a reasonable use of the property. The existing residential use does not require a second driveway access. The existing residential use has a functioning access off Layton Avenue North currently. 2. The plight of the landowner is not unique to the parcel and is caused by the landowner. A viable access exists to serve the parcels with frontage on Langley Avenue North that is not limited by the physical characteristics of the property. The property is adequately served by a driveway that does not require a wetland setback variance. 3. If the variance were granted, it would not alter the essential character of the locality based on a structural or architectural means, but would impact the natural resources of the area. 4. Economic conditions alone are not a factor in the variance. 5. The variance is not related to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. 6. The proposed variance will not impair adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets, or increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. 7. A practical difficulty does not exist, and therefore no action is required to eliminate a practical difficulty. The requested variance is not the minimum action required to provide access to the septic system and Langly parcels. If the City Council wishes to approve the request, findings need to be established that support the variance review criteria. Staff has prepared conditions of approval if the Council wishes to approve the request: 1. The applicants shall combine the five parcels (PIDS 3103220110026, 3103220110025, 3103220110024, 3103220110038, 3103220110039) into a single tax parcel no later than October 16, 2023. 2. The applicants shall submit a revised Wetland Replacement Plan under the Wetland Conservation Act pursuant to the restoration order and satisfy all applicable conditions and stipulations. 9 | P a g e 3. The applicants shall obtain a permit from the Carnelian-Marine-St. Croix Watershed District and satisfy all applicable conditions and stipulations. 4. The applicants shall obtain driveway, land alteration, and grading permits from the City of Scandia and satisfy all applicable conditions and stipulations. 5. The applicants shall obtain any and all permits and approvals that are required from local, state, and federal entities. Attachments 1. Resolution 09-19-23-03 Denying a Variance 2. Draft Resolution Approving a Variance 3. Site Map 4. Zoning Map 5. Wetland Map 6. Application 7. Variance Resolution from 2018 8. Attachments from 2018 Staff Report (provided separately) 9. Additional Submittal from Applicant (provided separately) CITY OF SCANDIA, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 09-19-23-03 DENYING AN AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE TO ALLOW A DRIVEWAY OCCUPYING A WETLAND FOR 18884 LAYTON AVENUE NORTH WHEREAS, Joseph and Katherine Reinhardt have made an application for an after-the- fact variances from the required wetland setbacks for a driveway that was constructed at 18884 Layton Avenue North; and WHEREAS, the parcel where the driveway is located is legally described as follows: Lot 19, Block 3, Bliss Plat 2nd Subdivision. Washington County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, in 2017, the applicants constructed a driveway from Langly Avenue North to their property at 18884 Layton Avenue North, filling 4,608 sq. ft. of protected wetland without applying for driveway, land alternation, or wetland permits to construct the driveway; and WHEREAS, the City of Scandia, in its capacity as the Local Governmental Unit (LGU) for the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) found the driveway construction to be a violation of the WCA; and WHEREAS, the property was granted variances in 2003 and 2006 from Scandia Township and Washington County that required the combination of PIDs 31.032.20.11.0024, 31.032.20.11.0025, 31.032.20.11.0026. 31.032.20.1 I.0038, and 31.032.20.11.0039, and the landowner is subject to both the benefits and conditions of these variances; and WHEREAS, in August 2017, the Washington Conservation District and Minnesota DNR issued a wetland restoration order for the violation; and WHEREAS, in September 2017, the applicants submitted a wetland replacement application seeking to purchase wetland banking credits to offset a portion of the wetland and to restore the remainder of the wetland; and WHEREAS, the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) reviewed the wetland replacement plan application at the request of the City, and denied the application on the following grounds: (1) the new driveway was not needed to provide access to the property’s septic system, (2) the new driveway was not needed to provide access to the storage of items on the property, and (3) the applicants had not demonstrated that no alternative exists that would avoid impacts to wetlands; and WHEREAS, the applicants appealed the TEP decision to deny the wetland replacement plan application to the City, and the appeal was heard by the City’s Board of Adjustments and Appeals in January 2018; and the Board of Adjustments and Appeals upheld the denial of the wetland replacement application and affirmed the TEP’s conclusions; and WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment and Appeals decision noted that, under Section 8420.0520, Subpart 3. C(3)(d) of the Minnesota Administrative Rules, the Board determined that the City had not receive a variance application or other application to allow for a potential alternative access on the property that would not disturb the wetland and that, if the City granted the variance for the alternative access, then the after-the-fact replacement application would be moot; and WHEREAS, the applicants submitted the after-the-fact variance application to the City for the driveway access from Langly Avenue North on September 4, 2018; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request for the variance at a duly noticed Public Hearing on October 2, 2018, and recommended that the City Council deny the variance request; and WHEREAS, the applicants did not formally apply for a variance for a potential alternative, they instead explained to the City Council how the potential alternative is not workable under the circumstances; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved the requested variances to wetland setback and the number of allowed driveways for a residence on October 16th, 2018; and WHEREAS, the applicant failed to meet the conditions of approval for the October 16th, 2018 variances and the variance expired; and WHEREAS, the applicant made an application for a same variance requests again on July 18th, 2023; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request for the variances at a duly noticed Public Hearing on September 5, 2023, and recommended that the City Council deny the variance request; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCANDIA, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does deny the requested variance to the required wetland setback for a driveway that was constructed at 18884 Layton Avenue North, based on the following findings: 1. The proposed use is not a reasonable use of the property. The existing residential use does not require a second driveway access, and the City’s Engineering Standards do not permit a second driveway on the property to serve the existing residential use. 2. The plight of the landowner is not unique to the parcel and is caused by the landowner. Viable access exists to serve the parcels with frontage on Langley Avenue North that is not limited by the physical characteristics of the property. The property is adequately served by a driveway that does not require a wetland setback variance. 3. If the variance were granted, it would not alter the essential character of the locality based on a structural or architectural means, but would alter the presence of natural resources and the allowed number of driveways. 4. Economic conditions are not a factor in the variance. 5. The variance is not related to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. 6. The proposed variance will not impair adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets, or increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. 7. A practical difficulty does not exist, and therefore no action is required to eliminate a practical difficulty. The requested variance is not the minimum action required to provide access to the septic system and the contiguously owned parcels. Adopted by the Scandia City Council this 19th day of September, 2023. Christine Maefsky, Mayor ATTEST: Kyle Morell, City Administrator CITY OF SCANDIA, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 09-19-23-03 APPROVING AN AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE TO ALLOW A DRIVEWAY OCCUPYING A WETLAND FOR 18884 LAYTON AVENUE NORTH WHEREAS, Joseph and Katherine Reinhardt have made an application for an after-the- fact variances from the required wetland setbacks for a driveway that was constructed at 18884 Layton Avenue North; and WHEREAS, the parcel where the driveway is located is legally described as follows: Lot 19, Block 3, Bliss Plat 2nd Subdivision. Washington County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, in 2017, the applicants constructed a driveway from Langly Avenue North to their property at 18884 Layton Avenue North, filling 4,608 sq. ft. of protected wetland without applying for driveway, land alternation, or wetland permits to construct the driveway; and WHEREAS, the City of Scandia, in its capacity as the Local Governmental Unit (LGU) for the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) found the driveway construction to be a violation of the WCA; and WHEREAS, in August 2017, the Washington Conservation District and Minnesota DNR issued a wetland restoration order for the violation; and WHEREAS, in September 2017, the applicants submitted a wetland replacement application seeking to purchase wetland banking credits to offset a portion of the wetland and to restore the remainder of the wetland; and WHEREAS, the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) reviewed the wetland replacement plan application at the request of the City, and denied the application on the following grounds: (1) the new driveway was not needed to provide access to the property’s septic system, (2) the new driveway was not needed to provide access to the storage of items on the property, and (3) the applicants had not demonstrated that no alternative exists that would avoid impacts to wetlands; and WHEREAS, the applicants appealed the TEP decision to deny the wetland replacement plan application to the City, and the appeal was heard by the City’s Board of Adjustments and Appeals in January 2018; and the Board of Adjustments and Appeals upheld the denial of the wetland replacement application and affirmed the TEP’s conclusions; and WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment and Appeals decision noted that, under Section 8420.0520, Subpart 3. C(3)(d) of the Minnesota Administrative Rules, the Board determined that the City had not receive a variance application or other application to allow for a potential alternative access on the property that would not disturb the wetland and that, if the City granted the variance for the alternative access, then the after-the-fact replacement application would be moot; and WHEREAS, the applicants submitted the after-the-fact variance application to the City for the driveway access from Langly Avenue North on September 4, 2018; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request for the variance at a duly noticed Public Hearing on October 2, 2018, and recommended that the City Council deny the variance request; and WHEREAS, though the applicants did not formally apply for a variance for a potential alternative, they instead explained to the City Council how the potential alternative is not workable under the circumstances; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved the requested variances to wetland setback and the number of allowed driveways for a residence on October 16th, 2018; and WHEREAS, the applicant failed to meet the conditions of approval for the October 16th, 2018 variances and the variance expired; and WHEREAS, the applicant made an application for a same variance requests again on July 18th, 2023; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request for the variances at a duly noticed Public Hearing on September 5, 2023, and recommended that the City Council deny the variance request; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCANDIA, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Variance requests to permit the secondary driveway that was constructed within the boundary of a protected wetland on the parcel at 18884 Layton Avenue North, based on the following findings: 1. (To be determined) 2. (To be determined) 3. (To be determined) 4. (To be determined) 5. (To be determined) 6. (To be determined) 7. (To be determined) FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED, that the approval be contingent on the following conditions: 1. The applicants shall combine the five parcels (PID 31.032.20.11.0024, 31.032.20.11.0025, 31.032.20.11.0026. 31.032.20.1 I.0038, and 31.032.20.11.0039) into a single tax parcel no later than October 16, 2023. 2. The applicants shall submit a revised Wetland Replacement Plan under the Wetland Conservation Act pursuant to the restoration order and satisfy all applicable conditions and stipulations. 3. The applicants shall obtain a permit from the Carnelian Marine St. Croix Watershed District and satisfy all applicable conditions and stipulations. 4. The applicants shall obtain driveway, land alteration, and grading permits from the City of Scandia and satisfy all applicable conditions and stipulations. 5. The Applicants shall obtain any and all permits and approvals that are required from local, state, and federal entities. Adopted by the Scandia City Council this 19th day of September, 2023. Christine Maefsky, Mayor ATTEST: Kyle Morell, City Administrator 94. 0 © Bolton & Menk, Inc - Web GIS 0 Legend Map Name This drawing is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This drawing is a compilation of records, information, and data located in various city, county, and state offices, and other sources affecting the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City of Scandia is not responsible for any inaccuracies herein contained. Disclaimer: 8/14/2023 11:15 AM 66 Feet City Limits Parcels (7/1/2023) Lot Lines Parks Scandia_2022.sid Red: Band_1 Green: Band_2 Blue: Band_3 94. 0 © Bolton & Menk, Inc - Web GIS 0 Legend Zoning Map This drawing is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This drawing is a compilation of records, information, and data located in various city, county, and state offices, and other sources affecting the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City of Scandia is not responsible for any inaccuracies herein contained. Disclaimer: 8/14/2023 3:37 PM 66 Feet City Limits Parcels (7/1/2023) Lot Lines Parks Shoreland Overlay PUD Overlay Lakes Mining Overlay Saint Croix River District Zoning Agricultural Core Agricultural Preserves Rural Residential General Village Neighborhood Rural Commercial Rural Residential Neighborhood Village Historic Core Village Center Industrial Park Scandia_2022.sid Red: Band_1 Green: Band_2 Blue: Band_3 94. 0 © Bolton & Menk, Inc - Web GIS 0 Legend Wetland Map This drawing is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This drawing is a compilation of records, information, and data located in various city, county, and state offices, and other sources affecting the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City of Scandia is not responsible for any inaccuracies herein contained. Disclaimer: 8/14/2023 1:43 PM 66 Feet City Limits Parcels (7/1/2023) Lot Lines National Wetlands Inventory Parks Scandia_2022.sid Red: Band_1 Green: Band_2 Blue: Band_3