Loading...
4. Staff Report-2014 Budget Follow-ups from August 13, 2013 Meeting � � �� /JI / ;,��� ���� SCANDIA Staff Report Date of Meeting: August 27, 2013 To: City Council From: Kristina Handt,Administrator Re: 2014 Budget-Follow ups from August 13, 2013 Meeting Agenda Item #: 4. Background: At the August 13, 2013 work session the Council asked staff to provide more information at the next meeting regarding the legality of using City funds for holiday parties and monthly dinners for the Fire Department, cost analysis of contracting out tree trimming services versus bringing more in house and need for additional public works employee, and clarification on Council approval for Farmer's Market. Each item is addressed below. Use of City Funds for Holiday Dinner and Monthly Meals: At the last work session, Council member Swanson mentioned she had gotten an email from Tom Miller last year saying it was ok to have a holiday party. He email read: "The question which needs to be addressed is whether or not there is a public purpose served by the expenditure. There is no clear case law or attorney general opinion that addresses this. I know that the State Auditor construes `public purpose"very narrowly. However, in this case I believe that maintaining lines of communication and improving staff and appointed official morale constitutes a valid public purpose. Finally, if Scandia has adopted policies regarding expenditures offunds the policies should be reviewed. IfScandia hasn't adopted such policies, I would add that task to the list of policies the Ciry should consider after the new Administrator comes on board." Scandia does have an adopted policy for employee recognition. This information was not shared with Mr. Miller however has been reviewed by our current City Attorney and he provided the comments below regards to whether the City can spend funds on a holiday party and if the City's policy needs updating. A copy of the policy was provided to each Council member in their New Council Member Handbooks in 2010. State law does not authorize a City to spend public funds for an annual holiday party. However, if the City has an established Employee Recognition Policy, the City is authorized to spend as necessary to achieve the objectives of the established Policy. Recognition events may be hosted by the Ciry to facilitate the objectives of the Policy. While the Ciry's current Employee Recognition Policy identifies its objectives as being 1.) to increase morale and employee motivation; 2.) to encourage loyalty and long-term retention of employees; and 3.) to celebrate the accomplishments and service of retiring employees, to demonstrate appreciation of the City Council, employees and citizens of the City of Scandia for the public service provided by all Scandia residents, the Policy should be revised to identify the rypes of expenditures that would assist in meeting these objectives. Specifically, the City could include language at b) under 4. OTHER RECOGNITION PROGRAMS to recognize the importance of semi-annual recognition events where the public service of all residents, City Staff and the Ciry Council are celebrated. The Policy could specifrcally indicated that as so ordered by the City Council, the City may host an annual recognition event in conjunction with the holiday season to recognize the important contributions of its citizens. If an event is open to the public, all of the Ciry's necessary expenditures under its Policy appear to be authorized. However, if only certain individuals are being recognized, the State Auditor has opined that the public entity may not pay for spouses or third parties to attend. Additionally, under no circumstance may the expenditure of public funds be used to purchase alcohol. Under the current policy a holiday party would not be allowed; the Council should provide direction to staff on updating the policy. The City Attorney has determined that the fire department's monthly dinners meet the public purpose reyuirement. The catering of dinner is ancillary to the actual purpose of the gathering which is the Fire Department's monthly meeting. Clearly, the monthly meetings serve a legitimate governmental function. The expenditure associated with providing dinner to the volunteer frrefighters benefits the community as a whole and is directly related to the core functions of government. The catering of dinner is not designed to be a private reward. Rather, it provides the volunteer firefighters with an opportunity to meet, interact and conduct their regular monthly business. The catering of dinner wholly falls within the public purpose requirement for expenditures and the Ciry does not need to adopt a new policy in order to continue with this practice. Originally, the question was posed for the Council after review of information on the clerk/admin list serv through LMC in April. The question was asked by the City of Harris which doesn't pay for refreshments for the fire dept if other cities do pay for these things and the following are the responses to that inquiry: Clear Lake: pay for out of training budget if all day training; have Relief Assoc. purchase beverages to store at station for after calls or during short night trainings. Pine River: pays for refreshments during annual meeting with townships, nothing for monthly meetings or trainings. Princeton: City does not pay for refreshments at meetings, Fire Relief Assoc usually pays for that stuff. Lake Lillian: the city does not pay for refreshments at regular monthly meetings but has covered minimal costs of refreshments for special training events where Lake Lillian is the host; if it is a big event the fire relief covers it. St. Martin: pays for monthly lunch of sandwiches, chips and pop, cost about $1,000 a year. As noted above, an alternative to using taxpayer fund for the meals would be to seek funding from Relief Association. Cost Analysis and Additional Info for Public Works Employee: At the work session Council member Lee stated he wanted to see a cost analysis of contracting out the tree trimming work versus hiring staff to do it. Below is a per hour breakdown. Current Operation Current Price per hour Bucket truck and 1 contracted staff member $85.00 Chip truck, chipper,and 1 contracted staff member $85.00 Loader truck and 1 contracted staff member $85.00 Bucket truck,chipper truck, chipper, and 1 contracted staff member $150.00 2 City staff members $66.00 Performed 1 ditch mile(having to wait for contractor) Cost per hour(Bold prices) 216.00 Proposed Price per Proposed Operation hour Contract bucket truck and 1 contracted staff member when needed $85.00 Rent chipper($450 per day)cheaper if purchased $56.25 Rent chipper($1800 per week)cheaper if purchased $45.00 Rent chipper($5100 per month)cheaper if purchased $31.88 3 City staff members $99.00 Propose 6 ditch miles(not waiting for contractor) Cost per hour(Bold prices) 155.25 The cost per hour of the new proposed full time public work employee is approximately $33/hour(this includes wages and benefits). This assumes the employee is hired at the minimum wage on the step scale and takes family health insurance. As you can see on the previous page, if the City continued the same tree trimming practice as last year which involved a contractor and two City staff the cost per hour is $216. Last winter the City spent over$8,000 and accomplished tree trimming along one ditch mile. Under the proposed operation of renting a wood chipper on a per day basis (note costs would be cheaper if rented for longer period or purchased) and using three City staff the cost per hour would be $155.25 or$60.75/hour less than using a contractor. Additionally, since City staff won't have to wait for a time when the contractor is available the Director of Public Works believes we can accomplish tree trimming tasks along 6 ditch miles in a winter. Still only half of the 12 miles established in the tree trimming policy but dramatically more than using a contracted service. In addition to the tree trimming analysis, the City Engineer has provided the following data after reviewing the Pavement Management Plan to address questions of why an extra staff person is needed at this time to maintain our roads when a smaller staff was used in the past. • According to the Pavement Management Plan oldest road was paved in 1978 (only 1700') • All other roads were paved l 989 or newer. • If taken the year 1999 or newer(46.26 miles of our roadways were paved/reconstructed in this period) • If taken the year 2002 or newer(33.45 miles of our roadways were paved/reconstructed in this year) • From 2002—2006 we added new roadways that included Tii Gavo, Wylewood Acres, Natures ls`&2"a Addition, Sanctuary, Wild Bush Acres, Manning's Overlook, Hill shade Farms • In 2005, 2006, 2007 significant road improvements were completed • In 2004, 2005, 2006 & 2007 several culvert&drainage improvements were completed throughout the City • When the City was completing all the other projects with Contractors this was taking away the time that maintenance would be needed throughout the City. • With the "newly"paved roads this eliminated bituminous patching throughout the City. Now today all the roads are all in stages that require significant patching...takes more time. • When Contractors were doing drainage projects, this involved ditching, culvert replacements, and pond grading. In 2006 a significant number of culvert crossing were replaced, and in 2007 over 500' of culvert crossings were replaced with the 2007 Street Improvements (Paving Project). Prior to replacing these culverts they were full of sediment and never maintained. • Another thing the improvements completed on 188`"-Norell-185`"that included street improvements & sanitary forcemain extension was done in 1999 or 2000. This added more septic tanks, but again reduced blading/grading, but now the road is 12+years old and requiring additional maintenance and other issues with the drainfield. • The City is now dealing with the things that are in the stages of significant maintenance or repair. So much infrastructure was built from 1996-2005 in Scandia. Things are 10-20 years old now .... infrastructure this old just simply requires extra maintenance. Committee and Council Votes Regarding Establishment of Farmers' Market: At the work session Council member Swanson asked how the Park and Rec Committee could decide to not continue with the Farmers' Market when the Council had directed them to participate in the past. The market began in August 2011. I've reviewed the minutes from the PRC and Council meetings from June 2011 through the first season of the market and have included the excerpts related to the market below. 7/11/11 PRC: Agenda changed to add Scandia farmers market–Approved as revised e. Farmers Market-Gammelgarden is interested in donating the parking lot to start a Farmers Market. Money would be needed for ads, vendors would need to sign up and could include food and live entertainment. Money is available for events in the budget. A subcommittee including Matt and Sally with help from Laurie was formed to discuss and organize. 7/19/11 Council: Council member Swanson, Park and Recreation Committee liaison, reported that the Committee has made plans to sponsor a Farmers Market in Scandia. The market will be held on Wednesdays from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. during the months of August and September, located in the Gammelgarden parking lot. Vendors will register with the City for booth space. 8/1/11 PRC: Farmers Market a. Sally ran 2 ads in the paper for the market b. 11 vendors have signed up so far and Laurie talked to a few more who were interested in signing up c. Sally has supplies to make a sign to put up at the 4-way stop at 97 d. Laurie sent out a press release that was picked up by the Pioneer Press, Star Tribune, Forest Lake Times and Country Messenger e. Laurie talked to Pam Arnold who is a graphic designer. She is interested in volunteering her time to work on branding and a logo for the market. 9/12/11 PRC: Farmers Market—Swanson reported that it had been going very well, and that a committee will gather to make plans, including branding, for next year's market. If the Council would like for the City to remain involved in the farmers market the Council should establish the appropriate roles, duties, responsibilities and authority for the PRC, staff, Council members, vendors, etc. I have had multiple vendors seek advice on who has the authority to spend funds, set policies, create advertising material, and other decision making authority. I could find no votes by the Council on these items. Additionally,the personnel services budget in the parks department would increase by $2,370 (this was the original amount proposed to the PRC before they decided in June that the market should be a separate entity)to account for staff time spent on market activities. In February I solicited feedback on the LMC list serve and contacted Forest Lake and Chisago City to ask what the City's involvement in their farmers market was. A summary of the responses is provided below. City City Funding Staff Involvement Policy Makers MISC Chisago City Farmers Market Chisago City through EDA Liasion to qtrly mtgs Board $1,500to hire Parks Diredor, Forest Lake manager Market Manager Parks Director Park Board and CC approve fees annually Winona Farmers Market provide space in street and parking lot 2 days a Winona none none Association week 2-3 vendors and seniors club set up in community Heronlake none none centerparkinglotonemorningaweek Princeton Farmer's Market Zimmerman none none Association use park one afternoon a week Princeton Farmer's Market Princeton none none Association use of city parking lot Waterville none none local interestgroup Dassel none none Chamber of Commerce Spring Grove none none use of city park Mantorville none none Chamber of Commerce use of city park Cokato none none private porta potty and advertising Sandstone (small amount) none annual permit to use city parking lot Golden Valley none none Use of City Hall every Sunday,$1 rent EDA Requested Levy: At their first meeting on August l 9, 2013,the EDA Board voted to request a$5,000 levy for EDA purposes and $5,000 levy for HRA purposes. The funds would be used for contractual services such as legal, engineering,planning and other professional services. As you may remember from Assistant City Attorney Pratt's memo first reviewed in January, the EDA may use taxes to fund a portion of its operations. The City Council levies the tax on behalf of the EDA. The levy cannot be more than O.OI 8l 3%of taxable market value, and the proceeds can be used for any EDA purpose described in state law. Since the EDA also exercises HRA powers,the EDA may levy a tax for HRA purposes with the consent of the City Council. The maximum amount of the tax levy cannot exceed 0.0185%of taxable market value. The proceeds derived from each levy should be segregated into different sub-accounts,to ensure the EDA levy is being used for EDA purposes, and the HRA levy is being used for HRA purposes. Because EDA and HRA purposes frequently overlap, a large expense could usually be paid for out of each levy, but payment options should be determined on a case-by-case basis. The levy for the EDA must be counted toward the levy limit however the levy for HRA purposes is considered outside the levy limit. If the additional $10,000 is added to the draft budget the levy would increase by 0.49%for 2014. New revenue and expense summary sheets as well as departmental sheets for the EDA and HRA levies are included in your packet. �� � � �� \° � �� �� �� °� � � � \\ �� � M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � o 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 � �CO � hNNO NO MM � O Nd' IOV O p 0 C � � MstN � N � 00 � � � O 1(] hiA �- O 0 7 OOODODCO � � NNQ �¢ NN � � O� hNOD � O ^ N ^ N �y, •- o Q � •- •- e- � e o 0(p 0 0 o a o N C�D f'n � � S � CO � CO M O � CO �- � � � OfD� Oc'�� 00 ON � (DaOn d � 00 � S � � SSO � o Na0 � N0 � OI� P 01f� Wf� QO tn1n000 CDOEO 000 Ifi 0 (OODfOIDNOh (O� N hM4A � CA � � I� O�f O (`MM lpIDO N � � tn 69(O N pppp t� t0 tn M CO N � e� O O 1� N W 69 fA� {D !fl� d9EA�69tfl�Oi ���d9d9p fAtl9��� tfltflN H Ql �' n w c$ g � woo °$ $ v �r� v o o r � � N C�0 N M ,fA � 1� 1� 00 N � y� O t � tA � fA � N � � N � � w � � 0 � fA tA M W Q.' OS O O o � L � � � � � � O m � is w w c ,t Y. p � i o o W t�O � Y�9 O W Onf ��f1 � � y N O �(DODON s- Oe' Q � q � !A � �Mh9EA� E�9E�9 W N � N �� d9 K Y! N V N � C n C�Op M O O M o � m C _ y � �Y O 1� LL�Y N N �0 � 1� 00 /0 �I�{ a1� M � � � � d � fA !A f9 W N N T2 m � N (n � C � W tt \ Q' N °� N r � w � N d � � � M � � € t9 � � N C °c+' a J NC� 00�j stpp Ot� O Op� Nh ��ApchtO O 00p O /0 0 �C�O_� eYOM1� Nt�00Pi CDC�DNO� � N � O'7 000 0~D � N CflGO (ON(V C�s{OONO sf Nlpat�h � O � ��O N � d O 69 N R QO N f� M M CD N O OI (A fA a- O � M C7 d9 d9� N CD lfl<O V!N9 M fA .- � W N � /fl 69 fA fA � ti9 W f19 K N N W _ G � � � « m y f- 7 N � c W4g- +.-�- YFG- E m � � � c 'p �- = w c � o m a�i � v = ' a�i � :' � � � � Q u. c o a� � 3UU~ � E am � � � � � � m o0 � �pct- c� ccELL a� En a � r � «. -� �o c 5 m � � �o a� a� � � m > — d � ,o � > > o � C o LL o� � c�i � a�i � �? ,~�� a aa� v Qa n� v � � LL Q m F- N +�, �° c h a� � � •� _ � > > � � E � c mLL m� di � � � � � �� m � Cg �� � �s � �v, E d an = ww�ii � � a� � � � � °�'.�� o � N � E � � � mB� E c o m � � a� .o n 'v� � � 8 :! QQ p F � � � y m � :�' a� m o � � m o a� o � o o � d ro m Q p m o c 0 � u m I.t. o c� avwaa. � aac.� c7 NILNNLLG c� aw .� c,� cv � w w = w � a �— � . o0000000 � 3 � � �' O � �V � O N O O � LL 1� � d '- <- N N C7 ln Ln � LL � V� �V t7 � C �YstsTd Q d' � � 1�- O '- N ('7 �- tt CQ 0p0 fV N r- 'r � � � c'�� MMMc7 7 V � 'ai t�DtO LL N t/� LL � � M � O N \ �\ �40 '�`e�oo o � ...00.�o`E p\ \'�E \° opQ\ ��'' �E�4 N a o o� o o e o e o o e o� e o� o C In (O f� NNOIf) NO O� MI'� efMO �� O prj00 000 � � �- � 1�7 V: Na0Na000 CO � O� O�tpO pp LL aD O O OD t0 N�N N p � N N O�O�O �A <f ' a0� O � � 0 a O � � � � .- .-� � � � � N � N � V � O O OO'V O O 1� N 1� N � �[7 f7 tf O O O a0 aO t� p p O N a M� O(O O O c'� O O O N m t0 CD I� 4�O tff 11) OO� O S O h Na0rN0� .- O � t� � hCOIh00 N�[1 P E0r0 O O M � tO00t� (ON Oh � N t�M �Ae� � � OOt� 1q ONP'f 1n � 0 M tt) �fH(O N [O � M tD 1!�'Q C f'� (D N (D R �- O N N fA i9� t0 � f7 f9 f'7 f0 W fA� �69 fA(A 1A M M(A � iA� W � F M 69 69 IA M! �.. M N M tA N N w v► raOi cNo 0 0 � rn o 0 0 w v u�i o 0 c �� w w � H q1� N 1� N�p lh d O O�} �t V T � �0t�1 �c�p �t0 �ff � ��69fh �D M Md�! � y u9 w rs � 0 C pp pp 0 0 � o 0 0 �p 1n p 1� N N h O O N ,��' W� 6�9 � � V � V V � rt� N IH b9 � IA K p U Q 1C) O O O CO ln c7 V ID O � O) t"f O O O N yr � �OOh Otp � TI� Q1N 01NN 000 � c7tONOMRNNOD ch (DO 000 � V V GO �(ON � t'700Nh he=0f tnNO �O } a � � tOM �ON � M�dM90 �diK ��W O � ' C � fA tA�fA Hi r r m o y w w � U � � p p � Q � � � � N ln� O N N t'N7 i�0 � Z � m v � u> in c'� co u'i vi u►N �p W F C a� �� ��N N a O m O. f9 M N W N � y � rn rn o u� r .- aV rn �n� �o = C � C1fj0 a�OMC�00DaD � t�A.h iND p � � O � �Vi� �ch� t0 M�H tO m {y fd9 N m a N a � c � m � � � o � c� � m c a � c v,�!� �°- � mmm �' v ,� � Q. � � �n omv �y coEa�i H 3 m � C� u. c a� 0 3UV� � � n � o ? 9 " �—�' m Q as � c1- c� cc LL mEa c .c v � c � m 'o aadd � m ` — m � � � ma`�i � m r. t m EEoo � � ' c � �O �/l U C O LL th f/1 Q � = O � •� � � 3 y� n a a•a� � 3 � � y � � � X = R .�° � y � >° c �` �� � �� � E@ � o u. 3 cn.= a m W � T� �V � U L C � U N � m m = O� � � .�. N C.� �._'' f/� O N W W C O C C � � �,� c .- a�a � E c o d �� a�a 'a� '7 � .. .. a � o F- 01 7 m v. m m o � � m o 0 0 � o o� m m co Q o R o e � u XLL o ac� waau. aac� c9 NLLNNIL � c� aw�c� a �w wxw � 000000000 � LL1 � �yo � � � 0000ao � m o � v rn o (� o � u, +� r- r rNNC7 ls L_ � el V V � vd' � d' � Q L (a � � = O O� � � � O O �p O O � O � LL �- fh C� [�ch M V V et O (D f0 N t/� � 0 2014 Draft Budget EDA REVENUE FUNDS 2014 Proposed Account Description Revenue Notes: Taxes 31000 Washington Cty.Tax Settlement 5,000 Totai Property Taxes 5,000 Intergovernmental Revenues 33422 Other State Grants&Aids 33640 Other Grants Total Intergovernmental Aid 0 Other Income 36210 Interest Income 36230 Donations 36240 Insurance Refund 36250 Misc. Refunds Total Other Income 0 Other Financing Sources 39101 Sale of General Fixed Assets 39203 Transfer from other Funds 39300 Bond Proceeds 39350 Certificate of Indebtedness Total Other Financing Sources Total Fund 5,000 1 EDA 5:16 PM8/21/2013 2074 Draft Budget HRA REVENUE FUNDS 2014 Proposed Account Description Revenue Notes: Taxes 31000 Washington Cry.Tax Settlement 5,000 Total Property Taxes 5,000 Intergovernmental Revenues 33401 LGA 33422 Other State Grants&Aids 33640 Other Grants Total Intergovernmental Aid 0 Other Income 36210 Interest Income 36230 Donations 36240 Insurance Refund 36250 Misc. Refunds Total Other Income 0 Other Financing Sources 39101 Sale of General Fixed Assets 39203 Transfer from other Funds 39300 Bond Proceeds 39350 Certificate of Indebtedness Total Other Financing Sources Total Fund 5,000 � HRA 5:16 PM8/21/2013 2014 Draft Budget EDA EXPENSE FUNDS 2014 Change Proposed '13-'14 Account Description Budget Budget Materials&Supplies 200 Office Supplies 203 Printed Forms& Papers 210 Operating Supplies�Equipment Total Materials &Supplies #REF! Contractual Services 301 Auditing&Accounting 302 Surveying 303 Engineering Services 1250 304 Legal Services 1,250 #REF! 308 Other Professional Services 1,250 309 Software Support&Maintenance 312 Planning Services 1250 313 Committee&Commission Reimburs 319 Other Services 322 Postage 331 Travel Expenses 360 Insurance 490 Donations Total Contractual Services 5,000 #REF! Total Dept. Fund 5,000 #REF! Notes: 1 EDA 5:16 PM8/21/2013 2094 Draft Budget HRA EXPENSE FUNDS 2014 Change Proposed '13-'14 Account Description Budget Budget Materiais&Supplies 200 Office Supplies 203 Printed Forms &Papers 210 Operating Suppiies&Equipment Total Materials &Supplies #REF! Contractual Services 301 Auditing&Accounting 302 Surveying 303 Engineering Services 1250 304 Legal Services 1,250 #REF! 308 Other Professional Senrices 1,250 309 Software Support&Maintenance 312 Planning Services 1250 313 Committee&Commission Reimburs 319 Other Services 322 Postage 331 Travel Expenses 360 Insurance 490 Donations Total Contractual Services 5,000 #REF! Total Dept. Fund 5,000 #REF! Notes: � HRA 5:17 PM8/2112013