Loading...
08-07-2007 Meeting & PC CITY OF SCANDIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA August 7, 2007 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of the Agenda 4. Public Hearings (None) 5. General Business a) Contract with CR Planning for Professional Planning Services for the Comprehensive Plan Update b) Introduction of Steve Thorp, Building/Code Enforcement Official c) Accept Quote from Tri-State Pump and Control for Anderson Erickson Main Lift Station Refurbishment d) Temporary Liquor License for Scandia Softball Association e) Park and Recreation Committee Taco Daze Activities 6. Recommendations from the Planning Commission a) Mining Ordinance(Ordinance No. 113) b) Variance for Two-Story Accessory Structure in Excess of the Total Permitted Square Footage for Robert Ten Eyck at 13500 182"d Street (Cates Fine Homes) c) Variances for Lot size, Setbacks and Impervious Surface Coverage to Construct a New Single-Family Dwelling for Allen and Penny Lepinski at 12614 182"d Street (Richard Grekoff, West Lake Builders) d) Variance for Second Freestanding Business Sign at Big Marine Lake Store, 19261 Manning Trail North (Pat Reicherts) e) Definition of Building Height--Discussion f) Architecture of Churches—Discussion 7. Adjournment Meeting Date: 8/7/2007 Agenda Item: City Council Agenda Report City of Scandia 14727 209th St. North Scandia, MN 55073 (651) 433-2274 Action Requested: Approve service agreement with CR Planning, Inc. for professional planning services for the Comprehensive Plan update. The Council should also give direction on financing the cost of the project. Deadline/ Timeline: N/A Background: • At the July 17 meeting, the Council approved the selection of CR Planning for to provide professional services for the Comprehensive Plan update. • The agreement, which incorporates the detailed work plan for the project, is attached. It has been reviewed by City Attorney Dave Hebert and changes he requested have been included. • The agreement includes a not-to-exceed fee in the amount of $58,000. The only expense to be invoiced beyond this amount is mileage at standard rates. The contract limits the total billings in calendar year 2007 to a maximum of$32,000, with the remaining ($26,000) to be billed in 2008. • We have applied for a $15,000 Metropolitan Council grant to help pay the cost of this project, of which $7,500 will be available in 2007. This leaves $24,500 to be funded in 2007. • It would be appropriate to distribute the cost of the project over several funds because the Comprehensive Plan provides the long- term planning basis for all city infrastructure and services. One possible division of the expense would be: General Fund 60% $14,700 Parks Fund 30% $7,350 Capital Improvement Fund 10% $2,450 Total 100% $24,500 • The remaining cost of the project($26,000) will be budgeted in 2008. The rest ($7,500) of the Metropolitan Council grant will be received when they have completed their review of the plan, possibly in late 2008. • In addition to professional services, the city will incur some costs for postage and incidental expenses for meetings, advertising and Page 1 of 2 07/25/07 so on. Those cannot be accurately estimated at this time. 2007 costs will be absorbed in the current budget. Recommendation: I recommend that the Council: 1) approve the agreement with CR Planning, Inc.; and 2) approve funding the anticipated 2007 expenditures as listed above or divided in another manner, as determined by the Council. Attachments/ • Service Agreement Materials provided: Contact(s): Jean Coleman, CR Planning (612) 588-4904 Prepared by: Anne Hurlburt, Administrator (comprehensive plan contract) Page 2 of 2 07/25/07 CITY OF SCANDIA, MINNESOTA SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH CR PLANNING, INC. THIS AGREEMENT is made effective on the 7th day of August,2007,by and between the City of Scandia, Minnesota("Scandia"),a unit of government,and CR Planning,Inc.,("CR Planning"),a corporation with address at 2634 Vincent Ave.,North,Minneapolis,MN 55411,and federal tax identification number 03-0508925. RECITALS WHEREAS, Scandia desires to retain CR Planning to provide certain professional services with respect to its Comprehensive Plan Update Project("Project");and WHEREAS,CR Planning agrees to provide such services upon the terms and conditions contained herein; NOW THEREFORE,the parties agree as follows: SECTION 1: CR PLANNING'S RESPONSIBILITIES 1.1 Services and Additional Tasks. CR Planning agrees to provide the professional services("Services") described in Attachment A to this agreement. CR Planning may also perform additional services as may be requested by Scandia subject to a signed addendum to this agreement. 1.2 Performance Level. In performing the Services,CR Planning will use the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by members of CR Planning's profession practicing in the same locality. 1.3 Independent Contractor. CR Planning will perform the Services as an independent contractor,and shall not be deemed,by virtue of this Agreement,to have entered into any partnership,joint venture or other relationship with Scandia. 1.4 Subcontrators. CR Planning may enter into a subcontracting agreement with URS Corp. and EOR,Inc. for certain tasks in the Scandia Project. Subcontractor shall have no contractual relationship with Scandia. 1.5 Project Managers. Jean Coleman is designated by CR Planning as the Project Manager for CR Planning's Services. Anne Hurlburt,City Administrator, is designated by Scandia as its Project Manager. Either party may rely upon the representations,approvals or other actions of the other party's Project Manager. 1.6 Schedule. CR Planning shall perform the Services in Attachment A within twelve months of the effective date of this Agreement. SECTION 2: SCANDIA'S RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 Provide Information. Scandia agrees to provide CR Planning with all known information,conditions, standards,criteria and objectives which affect the Services,and CR Planning shall be able to rely on the accuracy of such information. 2.2 Timely Review of Products. The Scandia Project Manager and the Scandia Comprehensive Plan Committee will examine all studies,reports,sketches,drafts or other documents prepared by CR Planning for review in a timely manner,and generally render decisions and provide information in such a manner as to prevent delay of the Services. Scandia/CR Planning Services Agreement Page 1 of 10 SECTION 3: OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS AND REPORTS 3.1 Documents Property of Scandia. Written and electronic copies of all documents,diagrams,sketches,and any other materials created or prepared by CR Planning as part of its performance of this Agreement(the"Work Products")shall be the property of Scandia and shall be delivered to Scandia upon completion of the Services. CR Planning may represent its work for Scandia in future marketing materials. 3.2 Project Record Retention. Project records and copies of Work Products will be retained by CR Planning for a period of seven years following completion of the Services. Project financial records will be retained for a period of seven years. Scandia understands that any Work Products prepared or provided on electronic media require use of compatible software and hardware,which may become unavailable over time. 3.3 Data Privacy. Scandia and CR Planning acknowledge that this Agreement is governed by Section 13.05, Subdivision 11 of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (Minn. Stat. § 13.01 et. seq.)("Act"). Consequently,all of the data created,collected,received,stored,used,maintained,or disseminated by CR Planning in performing its Services are subject to the requirements of the Act and that CR Planning must comply with those requirements as if it were a governmental entity. CR Planning does not,however,have an obligation to provide the public with access to public data if the data is available from Scandia. CR Planning must immediately notify Scandia in writing if CR Planning receives a request for data that CR Planning has created,collected,received,stored,used or maintained pursuant to this Agreement. In the course of performance of this Agreement,CR Planning may have access to confidential and proprietary information of Scandia. CR Planning agrees to use any proprietary or confidential information only for the purposes of this agreement and not to otherwise use,copy,disclose or disseminate the confidential or proprietary information to any outside source. CR Planning must disclose part or all of Scandia's confidential or private data as required by law,rule,regulation or court order. SECTION 4: COMPENSATION 4.1 Invoicing. CR Planning may submit written invoices to the Scandia Project Manager no more than once each month for actual hours worked and allowed expenses incurred during the invoicing period. The Scandia Project Manager shall review invoices in a timely manner and either submit them for payment or contact CR Planning to correct any deficiencies. 4.2 Hourly Rates and Allowed Expenses. Hourly rates invoiced to Scandia for project personnel shall be: $85.00 per hour for Jean Coleman and Brian Ross,CR Planning;$90 per hour for Suzanne Rhees and Mike Larson, URS Corp.;$82 per hour for Kristen Larson,EOR, Inc.;$35 per hour for GIS technician;and$25.00 per hour for administrative assistance services. Allowed expenses that may be invoiced to Scandia are limited to the following: mileage at$0.485 per mile. Expenses not listed in this paragraph will not be paid by Scandia unless CR Planning receives prior written approval of such expenses. 4.3 Not-to-Exceed Amount. CR Planning shall invoice for allowed expenses and for services performed at the hourly rates in paragraph 4.2. The total amount invoiced,however,shall not exceed fifty eight thousand dollars ($58,000)without prior written approval of Scandia. Within the total not-to-exceed fee of fifty eight thousand dollars($58,000)the total amount invoiced in calendar year 2007 shall not exceed thirty two thousand dollars ($32,000)without prior written approval of Scandia. On each invoice,CR Planning shall include an amount indicating the total amount invoiced for the project to the date of the invoice and the total amount remaining on the not-to-exceed amount. Scandia/CR Planning Services Agreement Page 2 of 10 SECTION 5: TERMINATION,DISPUTES AND DAMAGES 5.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by either party for any reason stated in writing upon seven (7)days written notice. Scandia shall pay CR Planning all fees and allowed expenses incurred up to the date of termination,and CR Planning shall deliver to Scandia all work products completed prior to the date of termination. 5.2 Disputes. Any dispute arising under the terms of this Agreement is subject to good faith negotiation between the parties,and,if unable to be resolved by the parties themselves,no suit or action shall be commenced without providing thirty(30)days written notice to the other party of intent to file such action. 5.3 Actual Damages Only. The parties shall be liable for actual damages only,and neither party will be liable to the other for special,incidental,consequential or punitive losses or damages,including but not limited to damages resulting from delay,loss of use,loss of profits or revenue,or cost of capital. 5.4 Insurance. For the duration of the Project,CR Planning will maintain general business liability insurance in a minimum amount of$1,000,000,and automobile liability insurance. Certificates of insurance will be provided to Scandia upon request. SECTION 6: MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 6.1 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings between the parties with respect to the Services. 6.2 Term of Agreement. Unless terminated under the provisions of Section 5.1,the terms of this Agreement shall be in effect until September 1,2008. 6.3 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended upon signed,written agreement of the parties. 6.4 Assignment and Subcontracts. Neither party may assign this Agreement without the written consent of the other party. Prior written approval shall be required from Scandia before CR Planning may enter into any subcontracts for this Project other than those referenced in Section 1.4 of this Agreement. 6.5 Third Parties. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create a contractual relationship with or a cause of action in favor of any third party. 6.6 Severable Provisions. Each provision of this Agreement is intended to be severable. If any provision of this Agreement is declared illegal or invalid for any reason, such illegality or invalidity shall not affect the remainder of this Agreement. 6.7 Applicable Law. The law applicable to this Agreement is agreed by the parties to be the law of the State of Minnesota. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed effective the day and year first set forth above. The City of Scandia,Minnesota CR Planning,Inc. By: By: Jean Coleman,President Its: Date: Date: Scandia/CR Planning Services Agreement Page 3 of 10 ATTACHMENT A Services The services on the following pages shall be performed by CR Planning for the City of Scandia Comprehensive Plan Update Project. Task 1: Project initiation,project management and coordination with City project manager The goal of this task is to ensure the project is completed on time and within budget. Project initiation includes finalizing the work plan,budget and schedule and preparing contracts. Project management and quality control review will occur throughout the project at regular intervals through progress reports and review of intermediate products. Coordination with the City project manager will occur through regular meetings,phone calls and electronic communication. City staff commitment: The City project manager will be available as needed to oversee the consultant team. It is not expected that the City project manager will dedicate a significant amount of time to participation in the development of the plan other than project oversight and some substantive guidance to the consultant team. The consultant team project manager will manage all day-to-day project activities. Task schedule: Project management tasks occur throughout the project Products: Contract reflecting final work plan,budget and schedule Monthly progress reports and invoices Meetings: As scheduled with City project manager and consultant team project manager Task 2: Work with the Comprehensive Plan Committee The City of Scandia has established a Comprehensive Plan Committee(CPC)that will guide the development of the comprehensive plan update. In addition to guiding the process and working with the consultant team,committee members will be asked to share the variety of community views they represent,to communicate about the process with neighbors and constituents,and assist in public involvement activities. The CPC will recommend the draft plan update to the Planning Commission. The CPC has proposed a schedule of meeting twice per month through the update process. Our team agrees that this schedule is necessary to complete the plan update within our proposed 11 month schedule. At least one member of the consultant team will prepare for and participate in each CPC meeting. A first task of the consultant team and CPC will be to agree on a progression of meeting topics that will result in an updated plan. A possible series of CPC meeting topics could include: Meeting 1: Introduction to the consultant team;review of workplan and schedule,including public outreach plan; review of Metropolitan Council requirements;confirmation of regular meeting schedule. Review and confirm issues to be addressed in the plan. Meeting 2: Review general outline of plan content. Visioning with the CPC in preparation for visioning with the public;Discuss concept of landscape character districts Scandia/CR Planning Services Agreement Page 4 of 10 Meeting 3: Review natural resources information and discuss natural resource and open space priorities Meeting 4: Prepare for visioning public meetings;review of current land use,economic development,housing, demographics and population forecasts Meeting 5: Review water resource plans and parks and open space plan Meeting 6: Receive and discuss results of public visioning meetings;review transportation and other public facilities background study Meeting 7: Review and discuss draft vision;begin discussion of specific landscape character districts; discuss structure,content and scheduling of character district focus groups Meeting 8: Review draft natural resource and open space objectives and policies;draft review natural resource and open space map;discuss criteria for creating alternative development/protection scenarios Meeting 9: Receive and discuss results of character district focus groups; Review draft water resources objectives and policies Meeting 10: Review additions to existing parks plan,specifically trail corridor plans and purposes and plans for specific parks;review parks plan implementation strategies;review additions to parks plan map Meeting 11: Define goals for and boundaries of landscape character districts Meeting 12: Review draft natural resource and open space implementation strategies Meeting 13: Review draft land use and housing objectives and policies based on character districts;review visualizations of alternative development/protection implementation strategies;choose preferred strategy Meeting 14: Review draft implementation strategies for water resources plan,transportation plan and other public facilities plan Meeting 15: Review draft land use and housing implementation plan;review future land use map Meeting 16: Begin review of draft comprehensive plan update that is a culmination of the work in previous meetings;discuss structure of public meetings on draft plan Meeting 17: Continue review of draft comprehensive plan update Meeting 18: Receive and discuss results of public meetings on draft plan;Continue review of draft comprehensive plan update Meeting 19: Review draft that incorporates changes directed by the previous 3 meetings Meeting 20: Final review and recommendation of comprehensive plan update to Planning Commission City staff commitment: Arrange meeting space;publish official notice of meetings Task schedule: The Comprehensive Plan Committee will begin meeting in the second week of the project and continue meeting until month 11 Products: Meeting agendas Facilitation of a maximum of 21 Comprehensive Plan Committee meetings Meetings: A maximum of 21 meetings of 2 to 3 hours in length Scandia/CR Planning Services Agreement Page 5 of 10 Task 3: Public outreachNisioning To achieve broad participation at critical points in the planning process,we suggest combining traditional public meetings with a series of focus groups that reach out to particular subsets of the entire community. Approving a final public participation plan will be an early task of the Comprehensive Plan Committee. Our team suggests the public outreach/visioning events for the Scandia Comprehensive Plan Update project as listed below. The Comprehensive Plan Committee may adjust the topics or the mix of types of meetings(open houses and focus groups),however,the consultant staff hours committed to such meetings shall not exceed the amount budgeted in the proposal. If additional public meetings are desired beyond the number of hours budgeted,additional meetings shall be charged at hourly rates in the proposal for actual hours worked. Two community-wide public meetings at critical points in the process. The public meetings will be designed to present information and be interactive. The consultants will not just talk to the audience. Attendees will be asked to participate. If desired,each public meeting could be repeated at two different times of day or different days of the week in order to get the highest participation. The first meeting will be held near the beginning of the project to present preliminary background information and gather people's natural resource and development vision for the community. The second meeting will be held when a draft plan is completed to receive comments. This meeting is separate from a public hearing. Holding a public meeting prior to the public hearing allows people to get answers to questions rather than just formally present their comments at a hearing. The public meeting will also identify any outstanding issues that can be addressed prior to the public hearing. Between the two public meetings up to 6"focus group"meetings will be held with residents of subareas of the community. These subareas will be determined by a landscape character district analysis identifying areas that are distinct according to natural resources, land use and historical development pattern,transportation access,and other characteristics. For example,the village core may be a character district as well as the St. Croix River corridor. It is anticipated that visions,objectives and policies may vary by landscape district. In addition to meetings and focus groups the consultant team will work with City staff to provide content for newsletter or newspaper articles at multiple points throughout the project. City staff commitment: Assist with meeting arrangements Assist in advertising events Placing articles in the newsletter or distributing articles to the local newspaper Task schedule: The public meetings will occur approximately in months three and ten Focus groups will occur in the fourth month of the project Products: Materials for public meetings Memorandum summarizing the results of each public involvement activity Meetings: Two community-wide public meetings Up to 6 focus groups Scandia/CR Planning Services Agreement Page 6 of 10 Task 4: Prepare background studies The goal of this task is to gain a common understanding of current conditions in Scandia,as well as identify trends, forces and opportunities. Previously prepared reports,studies and other documents,including the Metropolitan Council's Local Systems Statement for Scandia,will be reviewed. Data gaps will be identified and researched. Background studies containing maps,text and graphics,will be prepared for each of the following topics: Natural resources and open spaces Demographics Land use Housing Parks and trails Economic development Transportation Community facilities City staff commitment: City staff will provide the consultant team with copies of relevant plans,studies and data Staff will review draft background studies Task schedule: Background studies will be prepared in the first three months of the project Products: A series of background studies Meetings: The background studies will be presented at Comprehensive Plan Committee meetings listed in Task 2 Task 5: Prepare a community vision Based on input from the Comprehensive Plan Committee discussion,the first public meeting,and the focus groups, the consultant team will draft a community vision. The Comprehensive Plan Committee will review the draft vision. Consensus on a vision is necessary before proceeding to development of maps,objective,policies or implementation strategies. A final vision will be approved by the Comprehensive Plan Committee and incorporated in the draft plan presented at the second public meeting. City staff commitment: None Task schedule: The vision will be finalized by the fourth month of the project Products: Draft and final vision statement Meetings: Developing the vision will occur in meetings already described in Task 2 and 3 Scandia/CR Planning Services Agreement Page 7 of 10 Task 6: Develop land use scenarios presenting alternative ways of reaching the vision/Develop future land use map For the City of Scandia Comprehensive Plan Update project,two or three visual land use scenarios will be prepared, each of which will portray a possible method for achieving the community vision. The land use scenarios will include maps and text. Each alternative will indicate the following concepts: Areas for natural resource conservation Areas for residential,commercial and industrial development or redevelopment Areas for protecting natural resources within development The character and design of residential,commercial and industrial development The location and character of transportation systems The location and type of community facilities,parks,trails and open space The general environmental,social,economic and infrastructure costs and benefits of each alternative will be identified. The land use scenarios will be presented to and discussed with the Comprehensive Plan Committee. The Committee will choose a preferred alternative,which may be a blend of the alternatives. The preferred alternative will be the basis for the future land use map. City staff commitment: None Task schedule: The work on the alternatives will begin after the first public meeting and the development of the vision. The alternatives will be completed during month seven. Products: Two or three alternative land use scenarios in map and text Future land use map Meetings: No additional meetings are required for this task,the scenarios will be presented at meetings already described in Task 2 Task 7: Develop objectives and policies that move toward the vision Based on the vision and the preferred land use scenario the consultant team will prepare objectives and policies that move toward achieving the vision. Objectives and policies are intermediate steps to be taken to achieve the vision; they provide direction to implementation actions. Draft objectives and policies will be reviewed by the Comprehensive Plan Committee. Based on direction from the Comprehensive Plan Committee,fmal objectives and policies will be drafted for the draft plan. City staff commitment: None Task schedule: Final objectives and policies will be completed in the seventh month of the project Products: Draft and fmal objectives and policies Meetings: No additional meetings are required for this task,the objectives and policies will be presented at meetings already described in Task 2 Scandia/CR Planning Services Agreement Page 8 of 10 Task 8: Develop an implementation plan that reaches the objectives and policies After agreement on objectives and policies,the consultant team will work with the Comprehensive Plan Committee to create an implementation plan that reaches the vision,objectives and policies. Implementation strategies are specific actions that direct change, including recommendations for educational efforts,collaboration with other governmental entities and non-governmental organizations,incentive programs and regulation. The implementation plan will identify a timeframe for completing each implementation activity and it will identify the parties responsible for the activity. Draft and final implementation plans will be reviewed by the Comprehensive Plan Committee. City staff commitment: None Task schedule: The final implementation plan will be completed in month eight of the project Products: Draft and final implementation plans Meetings: No additional meetings are required for this task Task 9: Draft Scandia Comprehensive Plan Update Integrating the work of all previous tasks,the consultants will prepare a draft City of Scandia Comprehensive Plan. The draft plan will be reviewed by the Comprehensive Plan Committee and presented for comment at the second public meeting. City staff commitment: None Task schedule: The draft plan will be completed in the ninth month of the project Products: Draft City of Scandia Comprehensive Plan Update Meetings: Meetings required for this task are included under Tasks 2 and 3 Task 10: Refinement and approval of the Final Plan Update Based on comments from the public meeting and the Comprehensive Plan Committee,the draft plan will be finalized as a public hearing draft. At least one public hearing,meeting state requirements,will be held by the Planning Commission and facilitated by the consultant team. The Planning Commission may direct changes based on public hearing comments and will recommend the plan to the City Council. The City Council will review and approve the final plan. The approved final plan will be submitted to surrounding jurisdictions and the Metropolitan Council for review. Scandia/CR Planning Services Agreement Page 9 of 10 City staff commitment: Public hearing notice and meeting arrangements Staff will be responsible for submitting the final plan to surrounding communities and the Metropolitan Council Task schedule: The plan is projected for approval in month 11 of the project Products: Final City of Scandia Comprehensive Plan Update The final plan will be delivered in a hard copy reproducible form;and electronic format compatible with City software Meetings: At least one public hearing Planning Commission and City Council meetings to approve the plan Scandia/CR Planning Services Agreement Page 10 of 10 Meeting Date: 8/7/2007 Agenda Item: c) City Council Agenda Report City of Scandia 14727 209th St. North Scandia, MN 55073 (651)433-2274 Action Requested: Accept Quote from Tri-State Pump and Control for Anderson Erickson Main Lift Station Refurbishment in the amount of$6,231.16. Deadline/ Timeline: Recommended within 60 days. Background: • Pete Ganzel, Washington County Senior Environmental Specialist, oversees operations and maintenance of the City's "201" sewer system. He is recommending certain repairs to the Anderson Erickson Main Lift station located at the end of Norrell Avenue, and serves the area on the east side of Big Marine Lake. • The quote from Tri State Pump and control is for replacement of base elbows, check valves and rail system. This work is necessary because corrosion and age have made the existing rail system difficult and unreliable to use for routine pump maintenance. This is the same type of work that was previously performed by Tri State at the Bliss system two main lift stations. • This work would be paid for from fund balance set aside for long- term replacement needs. Recommendation: I recommend that the Council accept the quote. Attachments/ • Letter from Pete Ganzel, dated 7/24/07. Materials provided: Contact(s): Pete Ganzel, Senior Environmental Specialist 651 430-6676 Prepared by: Anne Hurlburt, Administrator (Anderson Erickson lift station) Page 1 of 1 07/25/07 Washinon Department of Public Health and Environment County ������{ �� Lowell Johnson Director Sue Hedlund 7/24/2007 Deputy Director CITY OF SCANDIA Anne Hurlburt Administrator, City of Scandia 14727 209th St PO Box 128 Scandia, MN 55073 RE: Anderson Erickson Main Lift Station Refurbishment I have enclosed a bid from Tri State Pump and Control for replacement of base elbows, check valves and rail system for the main lift station at the end of Norrell Ave. This work is necessary because corrosion and age have made the existing rail system difficult and unreliable to use for routine pump maintenance. This is the type of work that was done previously by Tri State at the Bliss system two main lift stations. All parts are replaced with stainless steel or heavy cast iron. The existing 5 HP pumps are in good shape and will be reused. This type of work falls under the category of long term replacement. Tri State is well equipped, and has experience with this type of repair, allowing the job to be completed quickly. The bid provided is only nominally higher than what they charged for refurbishment of lift stations on the Bliss system. It is anticipated that the job will take less than 6 hours without interruption of service. Please place this request before your city council for approval. Because some pump maintenance is needed now, refurbishment should be completed within the next 60 days. Sincerely, Pete Ganzel Senior Environmental Specialist c: Cindy Weckwerth, Program Manager Government Center • 14949 62nd Street North—P.O. Box 6, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082-0006 Phone: 651-430-6655 • Fax: 651-430-6730 • TTY: 651-430-6246 www.co.washington.mn.us Equal Employment Opportunity I Affirmative Action 07/23/2007 MON 16:22 FAX 320 558 2002 TM-STATE PUMP & CONTROL Z001 Order NumberB20831 TR1-STATE PUMP & CONTROL. 20092 21st AVENUE EAST Customer WASCTY PO BOX 7 CLEARWATER, MN 55320 USA 320-568-2000 OR 1-800-537-2040 Fax:320-558-2002 Email:tristate@tristatepump.com www.tristatepump.com Bill To: Ship To: WASHINGTON COUNTY DEPT PUBLIC WASHINGTON COUNTY DEPT PUBLIC ATTN PETE GAINZEL ATTN PETE GAINZEL PO BOX 6 PO BOX 6 STILLWATER,MN 55082-0006 STILLWATER,MN 55082-0006 USA USA 41-tAl; 64Aizat_ THIS IS A BID/ESTIMATE FAX 6s/- 07/23/07 UPS N30 : Our Order Number - - I 07/23/07 BB :"':'::•"'"7:7-!. ; :;7;..n:;7:::::•-;::::::r.;;;7: 2 0 CONBERS-0200CV RAIL SYSTEM,2",WITH LIFT OUT CHECK EA Y 0.00 0.00 VALVE 2 0 CONUGB-STNLS UPPER GUIDE RAIL BRACKET,STAINLESS EA Y 0.00 0.00 STEEL 2 0 CONIGS-0100SS INTERMEDIATE GUIDERAIL BRACKET FOR EA y 0.00 0.00 1"PIPE 40 0 CHAIN-SS-3/16 CHAIN,STAINLESS STEEL,3/16" FT y 0.00 0.00 2 0 FLO2134S FLOMATIC 2"SERIES 208S CHECK VALVE EA Y 0.00 0.00 1 0 CABLEBRACKET6 STAINLESS STEEL CABLE SUPPORT EA Y 0.00 0.00 BRACKET,6 HOOK 1 0 MISCPIPE MISC.PIPE EA Y 0.00 0.00 80 0 GUIDE1SST GUIDERAIL PIPE, 1 ,SST FT y 0.00 0.00 • (Continued) Customer Original Page 1 07/23/2007 MON 16:22 FAX 320 558 2002 TRI-STATE PUMP & CONTROL ?002 Order NumberB20831 TR1-STATE PUMP & CONTROL 20092 21st AVENUE EAST Customer WASCTY PO BOX 7 CLEARWATER, MN 55320 USA 320-58-2000 OR 1-800-537.2040 Fax:320-558-2002 Email:tristate®tristatapump.Com www.triatatepump.com Bill To: Ship To: WASHINGTON COUNTY DEPT PUBLIC WASHINGTON COUNTY DEPT PUBLIC ATTN PETE GAINZEL ATTN PETE GAINZEL PO BOX 6 PO BOX 6 STILLWATER,MN 55082-0006 STILLWATER, MN 55082-0006 USA USA THIS IS A BID/ESTIMATE 07/23/07 UPS N30 Riiichase,grder--M110mber :_:" grdgr-Date'=Sales' errors "" _.- ---. __.-... . ,_..-•--.. .. p �-�• ..... _:. . ._ ,::OarCfrdeFN-umber , 07/23/07 BB Ren, `Shirr B.O. Item Numisgr escnptlQn __ _ Uc t Te�c UpiKf't e _ Quist �m • 2 0 MISC FABRICATED LIFTING HANDLE EA Y 0.00 0.00 1.0 0.0 LF2 LABOR IN FIELD,2 MEN HR N 0.00 0.00 1 0 DESC FREIGHT INCLUDED EA N 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 LSP PACKAGE PRICE PER QUOTE EA Y 5850.85 5850.85 1 0 DESC PUMPER TRUCK PROVIDED BY COUNTY EA N 0.00 0.00 VISA&MASTERCARD ACCEPTED - NET 30 DAYS-1.5%MO.THEREAFTER • -------> NO RETAINAGE ALLOWED <— -- VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT WWW.TRISTATEPUMP.COM Nontaxable 0_00 Taxable Subtotal 5850.85 Tax(6.500%) 380.31 Total Order Customer Original pAriQ 2 Meeting Date: 8/7/2007 Agenda Item: 5 d) City Council Agenda Report City of Scandia 14727 209th St. North Scandia, MN 55073 (651) 433-2274 Action Requested: Approve the Temporary Liquor License for the Scandia Softball Association for September 7, 2007. Deadline/ Timeline: Background: • The Softball Association has requested a license for their beer sales during games at the Scandia lighted ball field during the annual Taco Daze event. • The license application appears to be in conformance with Ordinance No. 93, adopted by the Council on January 2, 2007, provided that a certificate of insurance is received. Recommendation: I recommend that the Council approve the license, conditioned upon receipt of proof of insurance. Attachments/ • License applications Materials provided: Contact(s): James Lindberg, 651 433-2265 Prepared by: Anne Hurlburt, Administrator (softball liquor license) Page 1 of 1 08/01/07 38 s5-2005 '3:56 FRCM-ATSE DEPARTMENT 651 430 3178 3 Minnesota Department of Public Safety ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT DIVISION °'• y 44.4 Cedar Strcct Suitc 133.St.Paul MN 55101-5133 (651)296-6979 Pax(651)297-5259 TTY(651)282-6555 W W W.DPS.STATE.MN.US APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A I TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE (Orptiiation or to stioa liruitod iv 3 norntik is a 12 month period) TYPh OR PRINT INFORMATION N OF ORGANLZ.ATION DATE ORGANIIT.D TAX L•XE ''T NUMBER.Sci-4'Jl)t&I� s5 o4't bA(1 /QSSoC,g7`totrj _ I ��7 S N OF l N MAKING APPLICATION T i 55647 +J,4mES � L/n117 i3U'jjNI;S' 4 2.2.6 1� rnth DAT1iS LIQi.%oR WILL i;I;SOLD(J tool dgx) TY?C Or dRCA3`7(7.ATIoN 3-33�- S�'pr 7 A b 7 r�caifCi ct CIIARITAELF . RELIGIOUS '2 OTHER Nor4PRO[77 o&G.ANIGA II9 OFT CER1p[AMF. �,bDRESS �Jl�A1�S , (JSQ ORGANIZATION OFFICER NAME ADDRESS --- ORQANl7J1ilON OF'I ICbR'S NAME ADL)kGss (.<;a ciaarM l alix nsr.siU 1 u.se.r, t Ito; los aE. c t �c1 p4RK T rite Tgca D4 Will thy a pplianttt wntraat for intoxicating liquor arn'k*t L s+o,pots tlr;:name and ut Qrc i,i µroc lic4uC p:xrved the>ac 'ice Wil!tote Applicant carry Lgnor liability uzrwwcc? 11:r.Bar "exit'mate nor;amount o;oice.rree.yeS 6-4;DOD a'�0Oo a eo 6Dec4144lv7t, (ROTE lu urau a i�ant mandator,)_.._ /'�1 APPROVAL APPI.TC'ATIONI MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY RCOU kg FOzESU:sh 117I~GTOLIQUORCONTR0I, �COUNTY S 6-a n c0 DATE AJPRO CITY FEE A\1OUNT S/O Sf LICENSE DATES DATE FEE:PAID 7-3°—c-'7 SIGNATURC CITY CLERK OR COUR ry OFFICIAL — - c rU'1'kOVEDIIQ110R CONTROL P;btbC7'U1a NOTE: Du net+eparate Thome two p.rta,saved both parts to the atklrcas shove and the original signal by this dr+;Blon %.ill tar raturneJ as the lieenac. Submit to the City or County at Jew!30 days Wort rc the evert. PS-09U79{,e9 PAID JUL 3 0 2007 o CITY OF SCANDIA Meeting Date: 8/7/2007 Agenda Item: 6- ._„) City Council Agenda Report City of Scandia 14727 209th St. North Scandia, MN 55073 (651) 433-2274 Action Requested: Receive a report on the Park and Recreation Committee's plans for Taco Daze events, including the 3rd Annual Dodgeball Tournament, and authorize the related expenditures. Deadline/Timeline: Taco Daze is September 8, 2008; registrations/advertisements begin soon. Background: • The Park and Recreation Committee plans to sponsor a dodgeball tournament at the Community Center during the annual Taco Daze community celebration. Last year there was some confusion as to what expenditures were authorized for the event, such as payments to referees and the cost of prizes. • In addition to the Dodgeball Tournament, the Committee will also sponsor a booth. • More information about these activities and the expenses involved should be available after the Committee's meeting on Monday, August 6. Recommendation: • I recommend that the Council receive a report from the Park and Recreation Committee, and authorize expenditures as may be appropriate. Attachments/ • Dodgeball Tournament Advertisement Materials provided: Contact(s): Dave Smith (651 433- Dan Skupien (651 433-4909) Prepared by: Anne Hurlburt, Administrator (park rec taco daze) Page 1 of 1 08/03/07 DODGE THIS ! 3'cd Annual Taco Daze DODGEBA TouRNAmENT Saturday, September 8 . 10 am - 8 pm • Scandia Community Center o� dip dive Qo Reqh}erNOW! o Team Spots Will Go fail! YAP. !o a Y-)tp alipoc o Divisions playing in the morning:Adults; 10-12 graders; o Divisions playing in the afternoon: 7-9 graders; 5-6 graders; 3-4 graders; *3-6 grade teams need a designated adult coach. o Teams of 6-8 people(minimum of 2 women/girls). o Each team guaranteed 3 officiated games. o Held outdoors at the Scandia Community Center o Teams need to be identifiable(same color shirt, headband etc.). o Prizes given to champion team in each division. o Cost per team: $30/$40 after the registration deadline. o Many more activities going on all day!$30 deadline is Sept. 5. Fee is$40 after Sept. 5. To register: Return the registration form with payment to City of Scandia at 14727 209th Street N., Scandia, MN 55073. Detailed flyer and roster form is available at www.ci.scandia.mn.us/ 6 Meeting Date: 8/7/2007 Agenda Item: City Council Agenda Report City of Scandia 14727 209th St. North, P.O. Box 128 Scandia, MN 55073 (651) 433-2274 Action Requested: Approve a reduction in the letter of credit for Big Marine Development, LLC for public improvements in the Tii Gavo subdivision. Deadline/ Timeline: N/A Background: • The development agreement for Tii Gavo required Big Marine Development, LLC to submit a financial guarantee in the form of a letter of credit for the public improvements (streets, drainage, etc.) in the total amount of$1,514,344.00. • The Council approved a $300,000 reduction, to a total of $1,214,344.00, on July 17, 2007. • The developer has requested a further reduction, in the amount of $350,000. • City Engineer Tom Peterson has reviewed the request and recommends approval. Recommendation: I recommend that the Council approve the reduction of the letter of credit to a new total amount of$864,344.00. Attachments/ • Letter from Big Marine Lake Development LLC dated August 6, Materials provided: 2007 • E-Mail from Tom Peterson dated August 6, 2007 Contact(s): Mark Sandercott, President Big Marine Lake Development LLC (651 433-1000) Prepared by: Anne Hurlburt, Administrator (tii gavo letter of credit reduction 2) Page 1 of 1 08/06/07 g1,g Mar%vt,e Lralze D•eveLopvikevit, LLC 21020 oLEvLda rrail North SCavi,i a, MN 55073 T: 651-433-1000 * F: 651-433-111j superorl,avtd@frovitervIet.vet August 6, 2007 Anne Hurlburt City of Scandia 14727 209th Street North P.O. Box 128 Scandia, MN 55073 Dear Anne: This letter is a written request to draw $350,000 from the Big Marine Lake Development, LLC account established through the Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number 10242-80 through the Alliance Bank. We have completed 2,600 feet of the road with 1,400 feet remaining to complete the connection of Lakamaga and Newgate. There will be operating and material expenses for said completion. We will also be incurring expenses for the materials and installation of the septic system. Please contact our office if you have any questions or need additional information for this request. Thank you. Sincerely, Mark Sandercott President MS:ks Page 1 of 1 Anne Hurlburt From: Peterson, Tom W[Tom.Peterson@bonestroo.com] Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 11:52 AM To: Anne Hurlburt Cc: Kris Sander Subject: Tii Gavo Anne, Tim Gile has requested a reduction in their letter of credit. Big Marine Lake Development has been clearing and grubbing, grading for streets, hauling and placing road materials, installing culverts, and preparing for construction of the wastewater system. This is their second request for reduction in LOC. The first request was in July for $300,000. This request is for $350,000. Our field staff has been inspecting the work daily and I was out to the site on August 1, 2007. I recommend that the LOC reduction be accepted by the City Council. The total reduction to-date will be $650,000 of the total $1,514,344, which leaves $864,344. Tom Peterson, PE Principal rel 651-604-4868 Zell 651-216-5295 :om.peterson@ bonestroo.corn iBonestroo i335 Highway 36 W A. Paul, MN 55113 'el 651-636-4600 'ax 651-636-1311 +ww.bonestroo.com 6/2007 pi'? Meeting Date: 8/7/2007 Agenda Item: 6- y) City Council Agenda Report City of Scandia 14727 209th St. North Scandia, MN 55073 (651) 433-2274 Action Requested: Authorize staff to sell old seppi offset flail mower. Deadline/ Timeline: N/A Background: • The city has been storing an old flail mower attachment for a number of years. Maintenance staff has received an offer from someone interested in purchasing this item for $200.00. • This is probably a reasonable offer given the condition of the equipment. It needs new cutters and has been sitting outside for some time. • Before we sell the equipment we should publicly advertise it for sale, in case there may be a better offer. • We would advertise on the city web site and in League of Minnesota Cities publications and web site. Recommendation: I recommend that the Council authorize staff to advertise and sell the mower at the best price offer received by August 24, 2007. Attachments/ • None Materials provided: Contact(s): John Morrison, Maintenance Supervisor Prepared by: Anne Hurlburt, Administrator (mower sale) Page 1 of 1 08/07/07 CITY OF SCANDIA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA August 7, 2007 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Approve Agenda 3. Approve Minutes a) July 10, 2007 4. Public Hearings a) Mining Ordinance (Ordinance No. 113) (Continued from July 10, 2007) b) Variance for Two-Story Accessory Structure in Excess of the Total Permitted Square Footage for Robert Ten Eyck at 13500 182"d Street (Cates Fine Homes) c) Variances for Lot size, Setbacks and Impervious Surface Coverage to Construct a New Single-Family Dwelling for Allen and Penny Lepinski at 12614 182"d Street (Richard Grekoff, West Lake Builders) d) Variance for Second Freestanding Business Sign at Big Marine Lake Store, 19261 Manning Trail North (Pat Reicherts) 5. New Business 6. Old Business a) Definition of Building Height—Discussion b) Architecture of Churches—Discussion 7. Adjournment 8/2/2007 City of Scandia, Minnesota NOTICE OF SPECIAL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TO CONDUCT SITE VISITS NOTICE IS HERBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Scandia, Washington County, Minnesota, will hold a special meeting on Monday, August 6,2007 beginning at 6:15 p.m. CDT to visit the sites and gather information concerning the following requests that will come before the Commission at its August 7, 2007 regular meeting: • Variance for Second Freestanding Business Sign Location: Big Marine Lake Store, 19261 Manning Trail North Applicant: Pat Reicherts (on site approximately 6:30 p.m.) • Variance for Two-Story Accessory Structure in Excess of the Total Permitted Square Footage for Robert Ten Eyck Location: 13 500 182nd Street Applicant: Cates Fine Homes (on site approximately 7:00 p.m.) • Variances for Lot size, Setbacks and Impervious Surface Coverage to Construct a New Single-Family Dwelling for Allen and Penny Lepinski Location: 12614 182nd Street Applicant: Richard Grekoff, West Lake Builders (on site approximately 7:20 p.m.) The site visit is an official Planning Commission meeting and is therefore open to the public. The Planning Commission will meet in the Scandia Community Center parking lot (14717 209th St. N.) at 6:15 p.m. Interested citizens may meet at the Community Center at that same time and drive along with commissioners. Owners and applicants are also invited to meet at the sites. For questions please contact the Scandia City Office, 651 433-2274. Anne Hurlburt City Administrator/Clerk August 2, 2007 July 10, 2007 The City of Scandia Planning Commission held their regular monthly meeting on this date. In attendance were Chairman Chris Ness, James Malmquist, Peter Schwarz, Kevin Nickelson, Christine Maefsky, and Planner Richard Thompson. Malmquist made a motion to approve the agenda. Ness seconded the motion and the motion carried. Malmquist made a motion to approve the minutes from the June 5 meeting with corrections. Schwarz seconded the motion and the motion carried. Mining Ordinance Public Hearing Chairman Ness opened the floor to public comment. Paul Hand, 185th Street, asked what it means on page 12, section 5, "The City may require a blacktopped road if deemed necessary."Planner Thompson indicated this referred to an access road, not a city road. Larry Engstrom, 185th Street, asked about p. 10, Sec. 7.1 (E) and where it applied. Thompson replied that the only contiguous mining operations were Dresel and Tiller Corp. He also complained about the speed of dump trucks on the road. The Commission responded that was a police enforcement issue and the legal speed is 55 mph, unless posted. Nan Fitzpatrick from Bracht said she will contact drivers about the speed complaint, and they do have a sign at the exit asking trucks to go 35 mph.John Lindell presented written comments with four points that he addressed. First in Sec. 6.2 he recommended that the mining operator be required in its application a list of all violations charged against the operator during the past year. Second in Sec. 8.3(7) he suggested that bodies of water created in reclamation not be assigned a shoreland designation automatically which would allow higher densities than the normal AG zoning would allow. Third in Sec. 7.1(1) (A) the setback should be 100 feet and define what is allowed in the setback. Fourth in Sec. 7.1(19) (B) (1) suggests that there be a 1,000 foot setback from property lines and groundwater for asphalt and remix plants. Steve Kronmiller, Carnelian-Marine-St. Croix Watershed District, referred to the letter from Watershed engineer Dan Fabian and requested permitting is coordinated with the City to save time and money. Paul Hand asked how often the mines are inspected. It is proposed that they will be inspected annually by a City engineer. Kirsten Pauley, Tiller Corp. consulting engineer referred to Tiller Corp.'s letter of July 10 for their written comments. Also, Pauley said to have a 1,000 foot setback for an asphalt plant would require a bigger operation to meet that setback. Fred Heinonen, Lakamaga Trail, suggested the City ask what would be the benefit to allow mining in the groundwater versus the problems it could cause. Natalie Fitzpatrick asked if a licensed landscape architect referred to on page 12 is really necessary to prepare the Screening Plan, or could an engineer do it. Thompson said an engineer doesn't know plants and is probably more expensive than a landscape architect. In Planning Commission discussion, Commissioner Schwarz, referring to page 8, Sec. 5.5, who would monitor protection of groundwater. Thompson said they've gone round and round with this and have no good answer. Schwarz suggested criteria be established. Commissioner Nickelson said he thought the City was going to disallow dewatering to protect the water table. It was suggested that the reference to dewatering be stricken, but then specifically state no dewatering would be allowed. Kronmiller suggested that July 10, 2007 Planning Commission Page 2 monitoring wells would measure water table as well as quality of the water, and a plan for monitoring wells (where, how many, how monitors) be in place as part of permit. Nickelson said the PCA provides some monitoring. Mike Caron, Tiller Corp., said they have secondary containment requirements on their asphalt/remix plant, and that the stuff is only liquid when heated. They also have storm water pollution control plans for the PCA. Planner Thompson will review the monitoring requirements. Chairman Ness brought up the setback issue. Administrator Hurlburt relayed comments received from Mayor Seefeldt. These included considering increasing the 50-foot setback and defining what is allowed within the setback (screening, berms, etc.); making it the responsibility of the gravel business to apply dust control when necessary; disposal of tree waste and debris—making it clear that burying the waste is not an option; improving the restoration language in Sec. 8.2—is progress continual, such as a restore as you go operation. Commissioner Maefsky said she would like the relationship with the Watershed District clarified. Thompson asked Kronmiller how they could work the Watershed's requirements/rules in with the City's process. Kronmiller stated that one way this coordination could be done is through a formalized"Memo of Understanding" between the city and the district. Planner Thompson will revise the ordinance per the comments received. The Planning Commission continued the hearing to the August 7, 2007 meeting. Swanson Concept Plan for Major Subdivision "Old Marine Estates" The Planning Commission reviewed a concept plan presented by John and Sandra Swanson for a major subdivision to be known as Old Marine Estates, located at 11980 Lakamaga Trail. The Swanson's propose to divide a 13.5-acre lakeshore property into four lots ranging in size from 2.6 acres to 4.4 acres. There is one existing home on the property. The Planning Commission discussed improving on the layout of the property, so that the configuration does not create a flag lot. Administrator Hurlburt stated that although Lot 4 does have a right angle configuration, it is not a typical flag lot as it does meet the 150-foot lot width. The use of a shared driveway was discussed, as the presence of a wetland across Lots 3 and 4 does make a driveway connection off the front of these lots difficult. The Planning Commission recommended that this wetland be delineated so that a more thorough view of the property can be worked with. The Swansons will get the wetland delineated and come back with a revised concept. Building Height Commissioner Maefsky recommended a review of the definition of building height, as its interpretation has been a confusing issue. It is different that the State Building Code definition. Administrator Hurlburt drew several examples to demonstrate different definitions of building height. Hurlburt said our codes result in higher peaks and that to follow the state building code would simplify things. Attorney Hebert said new codes were coming out. The consensus was to wait on proceeding with any Development Code July 10, 2007 Planning Commission Page 3 amendment to the building height definition until the updated State Building Code can be reviewed. Architecture of Churches Planning Commissioner Nickelson recommended a discussion on the architecture of churches, as Willowbrook Community Church was sent a letter in May asking them to consider that the new building they are proposing reflect the community's character. It was hoped that a standard could be decided on prior to the Willowbrook submission. The consensus was that the building be appropriate to a rural setting and fit the area's architectural style. City Planner Thompson recommended to the Planning Commission that they make observations on what their subjective ideas are and continue the discussion next month. Malmquist made a motion to adjourn. Ness seconded the motion and the meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Colleen Firkus Planning Commission Secretary Meeting Date: 8/7/2007 Agenda Item: >, C, ) Planning Commission/City Council Agenda Report City of Scandia 14727 209th St. North Scandia, MN 55073 (651)433-2274 Action Requested: Continue the public hearing and consider testimony on the proposed Mining Ordinance (Ordinance No. 103), review the changes in the revised draft, make appropriate changes following the hearing, and adopt the ordinance. Deadline/ Timeline: N/A Background: • The Planning Commission and City Council have reviewed numerous drafts of the proposed ordinance. The draft has been shared with stakeholders including the mining operators and interested citizens and property owners. Notice of the public hearing was published and posted in the legal newspaper as required by law, and has been publicized in press releases, on the city's web site and via a paid advertisement in the Country Messenger. • The hearing was opened at the July 10, 2007 meeting. Testimony was taken orally and in the form of written comments. The hearing was continued to the August 7 meeting and is still open. • TKDA has prepared a revised draft of the ordinance in response to the comments received. The revised ordinance has been made available to the mining operators and via the city's website. • The latest version of the mining ordinance (dated 8/1/07) includes new language addressing berms and their allowed uses, the need for monitoring wells, deleting references to de-watering, adding detail regarding subwatershed maps, defining operator responsibility for dust control and disposal of wood material and debris, definitions, setbacks for asphalt plants, timing of reclamation, and escrow amounts for administering the permit and abatement for dust or other nuisances. • The planner's memo, attached, summarizes the changes and responds to comments received. • Additional written comments were submitted by Bill Clapp after the July 10 meeting (see attached.) Recommendation: The Commission and Council should review the changes in the revised Page 1 of 2 08/03/07 draft, take any additional testimony that might be offered at the public hearing, make appropriate changes following the hearing, and adopt the ordinance. Attachments/ • Memorandum from Richard Thompson dated August 3, 2007 Materials provided: • Draft Ordinance No. 103 dated July 25, 2007 • Written comments submitted for July 10, 2007 public hearing • Comments from Bill Clapp dated 29, 2007 Contact(s): Richard Thompson, TKDA 651 292-4474 Prepared by: Anne Hurlburt, Administrator (mining ordinance public hearing) Page 2 of 2 08/03/07 TKDA 444 Cedar Street,Suite 1500 Saint Paul,MN 55101-2140 ENGINEERS•ARCHITECTS•PLANNERS (651)292-4400 (651)292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com MEMORANDUM To: City Council, Planning Commission Reference: Changes to Draft Mining Ordinance Copies To: Anne Hurlburt, Administrator Dave Hebert, Attorney Proj. No.: 13811.000 From: Richard E. Thompson, AICP Routing: Date: August 3, 2007 Staff have reviewed the written comments following the last Planning Commission Meeting and made several changes in the Draft Mining Ordinance based on those comments. The written comments include: 1) A letter from Carnelian Marine Watershed District (Dan Fabian) dated July 10, 2007; 2) A letter from Michael Caron of Tiller Corporation dated July 10, 2007; 3) An e-mail from John Lindell dated July 10, 2007; 4) Comments from Bill Clapp dated June 25, 2007 The changes made are reflected in the August 1, 2007 draft of the Mining Ordinance. An explanation of the changes made, and in some cases not made, is as follows: Carnelian Marine Letter(July 10, 2007) 1. (a-d)The reference in Paragraph 5.2 (9) (N) does include requirements. Scandia is interested in entering into a Memorandum of Understanding to coordinate reviews at the staff level not only of mining permits, but other permits as well. The City will make use of the Watershed District's significant hydrologic, natural resource inventory and wetland data. Regarding the comment related to two adjacent mining operations, the appropriate rules for EAW's and EIS' of the EQB will apply. No changes are needed in the ordinance to cover these situations. 2. (a-c) Section 5.9 has language added addressing subwatershed maps showing drainage patterns. The surface water management plan must address potential impacts to wetlands both on-site and off-site. 3. (a) The proposed mining ordinance will allow mining into the groundwater provided adequate study and precautions are taken assuring it can be done safely without negative environmental effects. The ordinance will not allow dewatering, which will limit the type of mining into the groundwater. (b) The ordinance cannot address itself how a future created lake can be classified. How it will be classified will depend upon the final depth, configuration and other factors unique to the water body. In addition, creating a lake will, based upon the Shoreland Ordinance, allow greater density around the lake. The issue of created water bodies will be addressed in the reclamation plan, which must be provided as part of the overall Conditional Use Permit. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Scandia Town Board Page 2 August 3, 2007 Mining Ordinance (c) The language in the ordinance states minimum required borings. As part of the review process, the Watershed District can recommend additional borings based upon the proposed mining operation. If additional borings are needed, the City based upon recommendations of the Watershed District and its planning and engineering staff, can require more borings. (d) The ordinance has been modified (Section 5.2 (9)(p) to require at least one monitoring well for all mines. (e) We agree that mining operations must have well-designed surface water and groundwater management plans. The involvement of the Watershed District and City staff and consultants will assure that those plans, as well as operations and maintenance plans, protect the City. (f) Language addressing testing for nitrates, pesticides and herbicides were not re-inserted into the ordinance. These chemicals are typically associated with agricultural operations. The surface water management plan, operations plan and groundwater plan will address keeping these chemicals out of the groundwater. The mining companies cannot be made to test for chemicals where they have no control of agricultural application. Tiller Corporation Letter(July 10, 2007) Page 1, 2PP--References to "Cement"have been changed to "Concrete Readi Mix" Page 2, Section 3 PP (2)--The last sentence was deleted and the new one inserted. Page 2, Section 3, PP (4) (A)--The phrase "which may consist of more than one parcel with more than one owner" was added. Page 3, Section 4 4.1 (4)--Reference to "cement" was change to"Concrete Readi Mix" Page 8, PP 5.3--The language in the Mining Ordinance is based upon language in EQB Rules. No changes were made. Page 8, PP 5.7 1st Sentence--The phrase"where applicable" was added to this section to clarify where permits are required. Page 10, Section 7.1 (1)(C)--The change to 5 acres has been made. Page 16, PP 19(B)(I)--Section 7.1 (19)(B)(2) was added which states: "If the asphalt operation was in operation on the effective date of this ordinance, it may expand subject to the setbacks set forth in Section 7.1(1) of this Chapter." Only new operations will need to comply with the 1,000 foot setback from property lines. It is the City's intention to limit asphalt and concrete readi mix plants to mining operations. Page 18, PP 8.3 (1)--The reference to 10 feet has been removed. Scandia Town Board Page 3 August 3, 2007 Mining Ordinance Lindell E-mail (July 10, 2007) Section 6.2 Annual Operations Permit--Requiring operators to report all violations would be unnecessary. If major violations did occur, the City would be made aware of them by the enforcing governmental unit at the time of the violation. Section 8.3(7)--The reference to Shoreland Management and in fact all of section 8.3(7) has been deleted. The appropriate ordinances will take effect as the water body is created. There is no need to point out a density increase in the mining ordinance. Section 7.1 (1) (A)--There are adequate safeguards in place for containment of any spill that would be associated with an asphalt or readi-mix plant. The oil mixture used in creation of asphalt needs to be heated to spread, and is a solid at normal temperatures. Storage tanks for other fuels, recyclables, etc. are required to have containment facilities adequate to handle a rupture. In addition, a spill and prevention plan is required. Clapp Letter(June 25, 2007) Section 1.1(2)--added "and processing" Section 1.1(3)--changed "mined or adjacent property"to "mined and other property" Section 3.1(4)--correct "change in use does include adding processing or asphalt facilities where they don't exist." Section 3.1(4)(A)--The forty acre requirement is a carry over from the County ordinance. In order to meet most of the setbacks, a minimum of 40 acres is required. Section 3.1(5)--The section related to waivers was retained. It is believed that the City needs some flexibility in applying the requirements depending upon local conditions. It is not expected that this provision would be exercised often, if ever. Section 7.1(1)(A) through (E)--The setback requirements should be replaced. It was felt the setback requirements were sufficient to protect neighbors and motorists as they are proposed, especially with requirements for screening and limitation on activities in the setback area, limited to berms. Section 7.1(4)--The term "where deemed necessary" was retained. There may be instances where there already exists heavy woods or other screening which would allow the City some discretion in applying screening standards where such screening already exists. Section 7.1(4)(A)--The language in this section states a minimum of six feet. In some cases berms may be required to be higher than six feet. In most cases, screening will be an earthen berm in Scandia, however, leaving the alternatives for fences or walls, while unlikely, provides additional flexibility for unique situations. The slope language has been added to the requirements for berms. Scandia Town Board Page 4 August 3, 2007 Mining Ordinance Section 7.1(4)(A)(5A)--Evergreens are the standard vegetative screening material prescribed in all ordinances. Although pines may not be native to Scandia, a drive through the City reveals many planted and naturally occurring evergreens. The City will make every attempt to make the berms visually inconspicuous at the time of Conditional Use approval. Section 7.1(4)(B)--The setbacks were not changed. This section was retained. Section 7.1(6)--Noise nuisances are regulated by Scandia zoning regulations, Section 9.3. There are methods of noise mitigation, for example new back up sound systems on excavating vehicles and trucks. The City will build into the CUP any available measures to protect the noise integrity of the Community. Section 7.1(16)(D)(2)--Added the terms "and from public roads." Section 7.1(16)(D)(3)--Correct, crushing equipment is a kind of processing equipment and is subject to (2) above. Section 7.1(17)(B)(1)--Correct, this reference should be to setbacks, Section 7.1(1). Section 7.1(19)(B)(1)--The reference to "public roads" was not added. It may be better in some situations to have the asphalt operation closer to the public road, perhaps farther from an adjacent home. Thus, to allow greater flexibility, the 1,000 foot separation from public roads was not added. Section 8.8--Any one of the conditions listed would be sufficient to trigger removal of buildings and property restoration. The City will require adequate guarantees including escrow amounts should the property simply be abandoned. Detailed provisions defining these terms will be included in the conditional use permit. Zavoral Gravel Pit--The Zavoral Gravel Pit will be subject to the requirements as listed in this ordinance. All mining operations in Scandia will need to apply for a new conditional use permit under these regulations. 6 25 -07078-2301-07 CITY OF SCANDIA DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTER 4 MINING AND RELATED ACTIVITIES REGULATIONS Table of Contents SECTION 1. INTENT AND PURPOSE 1 SECTION 2. APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 2 SECTION 3. GENERAL PROVISIONS 2 SECTION 4. DEFINITIONS 3 SECTION 5. APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(CUP) 5 SECTION 6. APPLICATION FOR AN ANNUAL OPERATORS PERMIT(AOP) 8 SECTION 7. OPERATING CONDITION 9 SECTION 8. RECLAMATION 17 SECTION 9. INSURANCE, FINANCIAL GUARANTEES AND FEES 19 SECTION 10. VIOLATIONS, PENALTIES AND INSPECTION 21 SECTION 11. TERMINATION OF PERMIT 21 SECTION 12. EFFECTUATION 22 SECTION 13 REPEALER 22 6 25 07078-2301-07 ORDINANCE No. MINING AND RELATED ACTIVITIES Gravel and other mineral deposits are a valuable resource, available in generous quantities in the City of Scandia. This Chapter was developed to establish conditions whereby these mineral deposits, primarily gravel, will be made available for general use. This Chapter also provides guidelines protecting natural resources and adjacent areas from adverse impacts and for restoring the land to a usable, attractive condition after the mining operation is finished. Owner/operators of mining asphalt and concrete ready-mix cement operations must comply with Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and Minnesota Health Department regulations when any groundwater(aquifer supply) is used or affected in the mining process. Asphalt operations or concrete ready-mix plants, either portable or permanent, and any new operations or existing operations that are substantially expanding or changing must have a Conditional Use Permit from the City of Scandia. This mining regulation is adopted pursuant to the authorization and policies contained in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 394. SECTION 1. INTENT AND PURPOSE 1.1 Purpose. This Chapter is adopted for the purposes of: (1.) Providing for the health, welfare, and safety of the community by regulating the removal of sand, rock, soil, and other natural deposits in the City of Scandia. (2) Providing for the economic availability al--removal and processing of sand, gravel, rock, soil, and other materials vital to the economic well-being of the region. (3) Establishing regulations, safeguards and controls regarding noise, dust, odors, traffic, drainage, groundwater quality and other factors which will minimize the environmental and aesthetic impacts on mined or adjacent other property. (4) Establishing regulations, policies and processes to protect the quality and quantity of groundwater in Scandia and its environs. (5) Reducing the potential for pollution caused by wind, soil erosion and sedimentation. (6) Establishing locations, orderly approval processes and operating conditions under which mining operations will be allowed and establishing conditions which City of Scandia, Minnesota Page I Development Code - -0-70-78-2301-07 ensure the restoration of mined areas consistent with the existing and planned land use patterns. (7) Ensuring compliance with the regulations established in this ordinance on those mining operations presently operating in Scandia. (8) Meeting the goals and policies of the Scandia Comprehensive Plan. SECTION 2. APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 2.1 Application. (1) This Chapter applies to land uses within the City of Scandia. Where this Chapter imposes a greater restriction upon the land than is imposed or required by other existing provisions of law, ordinance, contract or deed, the provisions of this Chapter shall control. SECTION 3. GENERAL PROVISIONS 3.1 A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and an Annual Operators Permit (AOP) are required for all mining operations and are subject to the following: (1) The operation of a mining operation without a valid Conditional Use Permit (CUP) or an Annual Operators Permit (AOP) is declared to be a nuisance, and it shall be unlawful for any person,partnership, company or corporation to engage in mining in violation of this section, or for any property owner to permit mining of the property owner's property in violation of this section. (2) Existing operators holding a Conditional Use Permit from Washington County may operate under the terms and conditions of the Washington County CUP until its expiration date or until 90 days after this Chapter is adopted, whichever occurs later. If no permit is applied for and complete, and/or subsequently issued, all reclamation plan.If a complete permit application is not submitted within 90 days after thethis Chapter is adopted, all mining operations shall cease and the property restored in accordance with the provisions of the approved reclamation plan. (3) For new mining operations, the Applicant must apply for a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Section 5 of this Chapter. In cases where a mandatory or discretionary EAW is required, or an EIS is required, those documents shall be prepared and accepted by the City before application for a CUP. City of Scandia,Minnesota Page 2 Development Code 6 25 07078-2301-07 (4) In order for the City to grant a Conditional Use Permit for a new mining operation or the expansion or change in use of an existing operation, all of the following criteria must be met: (A) The property which may consist of more than one parcel with more than one Owner,isowner, is at least 40 contiguous acres in size. (B) The standards for approval of a conditional use permit as contained in Chapter One, Section 7, of the Scandia Development Code are met; (C) The operation is consistent with the Scandia Comprehensive Plan; and (D) All provisions of this Chapter are met. (5) The standards which apply to these permits may be varied by the City according to the structure and size of the operation, and to factors presented by the mine operator and other interested parties. (6) Prior to the issuance of the Annual Operators Permit, an annual report and application shall be submitted to the City for determination if the operation complies with the requirements of this Chapter. The City will then make an inspection and deliver an inspection report to the operator. If the operator's application conforms to the requirements of this Chapter, and the inspection report indicates compliance with the terms of the CUP and AOP, the Annual Operators Permit may be issued. SECTION 4. DEFINITIONS 4.1 For the purpose of these regulations, certain terms and words are hereby defined as follows: (other terms are defined in the Zoning and Subdivision Chapters) (1) Add. Rock. Rock or rock material imported to a gravel site to blend with quarried rock to obtain a desired rock product. (2) Asphalt Plant.. Machinery, either temporary or permanent, used for blending and making aggregate materials with oil based materials to create hot or cold asphalt products. (3) Berm. An earthen structure not less than 6 feet in height designed to provide screening of mining operations from public roads and neighboring properties. Berms must have a minimum slope of 3:1 and have a silt fence at the base closest to the public road or neighboring property. The silt fence shall be maintained until vegetation is established, at which time it shall be removed. (=-4) Bond. Any form of security including a cash deposit, surety bond, collateral, or instrument of credit in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Scandia. All City of Scandia, Minnesota Page 3 Development Code 6 25 07078-2301-07 bonds shall be approved by the City of Scandia wherever a bond is required by these regulations. (45) Cement PlantConcrete Ready-Mix Plant. Machinery used to mix materials (usually cement, sand, or aggregate) and water to create cement or concrete for commercial sales. (5 (6) Confined Aquifer. An aquifer that is overlain and underlain by relatively impermeable layers or beds of rock or unconsolidated material (clay/silt) and contains water under pressure. (74) Dewatering. The pumping extraction or removal of subsurface water. (78) Grading. The removal, depositing, or moving of more than 50 cubic yards of sand, gravel, rock, soil, clay or other deposits in less than a one_(1) year period on any parcel. (89) Groundwater. Water contained below the ground surface in the saturated zone. (9)10) Holiday. New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day. (1 011) Mining. The excavation, removal, storage or processing of sand, gravel, rock, soil, clay, or other deposits. Mining shall not include the excavation, removal, or storage of rock, sand, dirt, gravel, clay, or other material for the following purposes: (A) Excavation for the foundation, cellar, or basement of some pending structure for which a permit has been issued and which is to be erected immediately following the excavation, removal or storage. (B) On-site construction of approved roads, sewer lines, storm sewers, water mains, surface water drainage approved by the local unit of government, agriculture or conservation purposes, sod removal, or other public utilities. (C) Landscaping purposes on a lot used or to be used as a building site. (D) Grading/excavation of less than one (11 acre of land in conjunction with improvement of a site for lot development, providing activities will be completed in one year. (1 1 12) Mining Season. The period, not to exceed one year, contained within any calendar year. (4-213) Operator. A person, partnership, company, corporation or other business entity engaged in or proposing to conduct a mining operation. In the event the operator City of Scandia,Minnesota Page 4 Development Code 6 25 07078-2301-07 is not the fee owner of the land to be mined, then the fee owner's consent shall be required for the Conditional Use Permit (CUP). (�14) Organic Soil. Soil that sustains and facilitates healthy plant growth. ( 15) Overburden. Those materials which lie above the mineral deposit to be mined. (-16) Processing. Any activity which may include the crushing, washing, stockpiling, compounding, mixing, or treatment of sand, gravels, rocks, or similar mineral products into consumable products such as construction grade sand, gravel, concrete, asphalt, and other similar products. (1617) Reclamation, Restoration, Rehabilitation. To renew land to a self-sustaining, long term use which is compatible with contiguous land uses and which process shall include the reestablishment of vegetation, soil stability and establishment of safe conditions appropriate to the intended use of the land in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Conditional Use Permit conditions allowing for excavation and/or processing on the site. (1718) Stockpiling. Storage of processed or raw materials on the site of the sand, gravel or rock operation. (1819) Topsoil. That portion of the overburden which lies within the "A" and "B" horizon of soil closest to the surface and which supports the growth of vegetation. (1920) Unconfined Aquifer. An aquifer that is not naturally protected by an overlying confining bed or layer and the water level is at atmospheric pressure. SECTION 5. APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(CUP) 5.1 The application for a Conditional Use Permit for a mining operation must be filed with the City. The City shall follow procedures prescribed in Chapter One, Section 7, Conditional Uses, of the City Development Code. The application must be made in the name(s) of the operator of the mine and owner of the land to be mined. 5.2 The application shall contain the following: (1) The name and address of the operator and owner of the land. (2) An accurate legal description of the property where the mining shall occur. (3) Names of the adjacent landowners including all those within a one-half(1/2) mile of the perimeter of the property being or to be mined. (4) A narrative outlining the type of material to be excavated, mode of operation, estimate of amount of material to be removed, plans for blasting, estimated time City of Scandia,Minnesota Page 5 Development Code 6 25 070g8-2301-07 to complete the removal, and other pertinent information to explain the request in detail. (5) All fees and escrow amounts as established by Ordinance of the City Council. (6) Survey indicating property boundaries. (7) A map of the property where the mining is to occur that clearly indicates the property lines and the limits of the proposed excavation with operating setbacks described in Section 7, topographic data, including contours at 2 foot vertical intervals. Water courses, marsheswetlands, wooded areas, rock outcrops, power transmission poles and lines, and other significant features shall also be shown. U.S.G.S. datum shall be used for all topographic mapping. Interpolated contour data from U.S.G.S. Quadrangle maps is not permitted. (8) A general location map and aerial photo showing the proposed mining site in relation to the community. (9) Maps and Plans showing the following for the site and within 300 feet of the perimeter of the mine-: (A) Roads or streets showing all access routes between the property and the nearest arterial road, identifying name, right-of-way width and traveled portion width. (B) Easements Plan with widths and purpose. (C) Natural land features showing locations of watercourses and drainageways, flood elevation, wetlands, sinks, basins, and wooded areas. (D) Natural Resources including other surface water, groundwater depth, flora, fauna, and any other natural features in the rural environment. (E) Man-made features such as buildings and other structures, dams, dikes, and impoundments of water. (F) Adjacent land features with all of the requirements included above within 300 feet of the perimeter of the mine, and all platted subdivision lots, metes and bounds parcels, and homes within 1/4 mile of the property boundaries. Wells should include private/agriculture, industrial, municipal wells within a 1/2 mile radius of the mine. (G) A minimum of 1 cross-section for every 1000 feet running north/south and east/west, showing the extent of overburden, extent of sand and gravel deposits, the groundwater level (even if they are below the base of the proposed mine floor), and any evidence of the groundwater level in the City of Scandia, Minnesota Page 6 Development Code 6 25 07078-2301-07 past. Additional cross sections may be required at the discretion of the City. (H) All processing areas shall be identified and boundaries shown to scale. (I) All access roads within the site to processing and mining areas shown to scale. (J) Sequences or phases of operation showing approximate areas involved shown to scale and serially numbered with a description of each. (K) Location of screening berms shown to scale, and notes provided indicating when they will be used as reclamation material. In the same manner overburden storage areas shall be identified and noted. (L) Fences and gates shall be shown on the site map, and their type or construction shall be described and illustrated. (M) Proposed location of principal service or processing buildings or enclosures shall be shown, as well as location of settling basins and process water ponds. (N) Existing site drainage features shall be shown and flow directions indicated. A plan for handling surface drainage during operation and after final reclamation shall be developed, consistent with local surface water management plans. (0) A plan for groundwater quality protection shall be submitted with the application. The plan shall include a minimum of 3 borings showing depth to groundwater. If gFe „d ountered at a depth of 15-eet borings any further. The City may require additional borings if necessary. (P) All mining operations must install one monitoring well. If the proposed mining operation will appropriate ground water for use in mining operations, the operator shall install not less than one monitoring well down-gradient of the mining operation. If the proposed mining operation will include mining into the water table but no dewatering, not less than two monitoring wells shall be installed one up-gradient and one down- gradient of the mine. If the proposed mining operation includes dewatering, not 1-ess thane monitoring wells shall be installed down gradient of the mine in locations agreed upon by the operator and the City's engineer. (Q) If lighting is proposed, a plan for lighting of the area must be provided. The plan must comply with all City ordinances pertaining to lighting. City of Scandia, Minnesota Page 7 Development Code 6 25 07078-2301-07 (R) Reclamation plan in conformance with Section 8 shall be provided. (S) If blasting is proposed as part of the mining operation, the operator must indicated frequency, timing, size, duration and develop a blasting plan. (T) A description of any processing operations including, washing, crushing, recycling and bituminous plants and concrete ready mix plants shall be provided. (U) Any other information, reports, or studies the City deems necessary for purposes of evaluating environmental or aesthetic impacts shall be provided. 5.3 The applicant (application) must comply with all rules of the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board Environmental Review Program. 5.43 A mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet shall be required for development of a facility for the extraction or mining of sand, gravel, stone or other nonmetallic minerals which will excavate 40 or more acres of land to a mean depth of 10 feet or more during its existence. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet shall be required for any operation in which mining is proposed below the groundwater level. The City shallwi41 be the responsible governmental unit for the preparation of the an Environmental Assessment Worksheet. (Chapter M.S. 4410.4300 Subpart 12.) The City may require an Environmental Assessment Worksheet if available evidence indicates that the proposed operation may have the potential for significant environmental effects. 5.54 A mandatory Environmental Impact Statement shall be required for the development of a facility for the extraction or mining of sand, gravel, stone or other nonmetallic minerals, which will excavate 160 acres of land or more to a mean depth of 10 feet or more during its existence. The City will shall be the responsible governmental unit for the preparation of the an Environmental Impact Statement. (Chapter M.S. 4410.4400 Subpart 9.) 5.65 Protection of Groundwater. The maximum depth of excavation shall be established so that groundwater quality and quantity are protected. This depth of excavation shall be established by the City and will be based, in part, upon soil characteristics, depth to groundwater, nature of mining proposed, and local use of the aquifer. Mining shall not be allowed in confined aquifers. Excavation into unconfined aquifers must be closely monitored and conducted according to the conditions of the permit. If it is determined in the course of mining that the mining operation has negatively impacted a well by lowering yields or water quality, the operator of the mine shall be responsible for providing a new well for the property. No extraction operations shall be conducted in such a manner as to permanently lower the water table of surrounding properties or any other water body, wetland, or groundwater dependent natural resources. City of Scandia, Minnesota Page 8 Development Code • 6 25 O7O 8-23O1-07 5.766 All provisions of the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board Environmental Review 5,7 Permits from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency will be required for a mining operation in relation to air, noise, and water quality where applicable. An air quality permit may be necessary for smoke stack discharges from processing plants or fugitive dust from operating areas. If the mining operation discharges water from pit do watering and/or gravel washing3, a State Disposal System permit or a National Pollution Discharge Elimination (NPDES)permit may be necessary from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. As a condition of any permit issued pursuant to this Chapter, no mining will be allowed until evidence is shown the operator has obtained these permits or none are necessary. 5.8 Permits from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources may be required in the event any type of work is proposed that affectsia public waters,or if there is a need for de watering the pit to gain access to sand, gravel and rock. A permit may also be needed for a well in connection with a washing facility. As a condition of any permit issued pursuant to this Chapter, no mining will be allowed until evidence is shown the operator has obtained these permits or none are necessary. 5.9 A surface water protection plan to address on-going monitoring; accident response and remediation shall be required. Surface water protection plans must include subwatershed maps delineating all drainage areas that drain to or through the property as well as for the property itself. 5.10 Any mining operation having access from a State, County, or local highway or street must obtain an access permit from the respective agency or the City. A-Tturn lanes and/or bypass lanes may be required by the respective agency or the City to reduce the risk of traffic safety hazards. The cost of construction of a turn or bypass lanes shall be the sole expense of the operator. 5.11 Abandoned wells must be sealed in accordance with State and County requirements. SECTION 6. APPLICATION FOR AN ANNUAL OPERATORS PERMIT(AOP) 6.1 The application for an Annual Operators Permit (AOP) for a mining operation must be filed with the City. The application must be made in the name(s) of the operator of the mine and must be filed by January 31 st of each year.. 6.2 The application shall contain the following: (1) The operator shall submit an Annual Report that summarizes the operating conditions regulated by Section 7. The Annual Report shall summarize the annual activity for the amount of material removed from the site, amount of add-rock brought onto the site, area reclaimed and type of reclamation, average number of City of Scandia, Minnesota Page 9 Development Code 6 25 07078-2301-07 trips hauling material to and from the site per day for the season, any changes made to the site, and other conditions specific to the Conditional Use Permit. (2) The AOP Application shall identify how the operating conditions for the coming year will vary from the previous year, if any variation is expected. The AOP Application shall include a site plan and aerial photos that show the active mining area and the location of existing and planned stockpiles for the coming year. The AOP Application shall describe reclamation to occur and describe the operating conditions planned for the coming year. (3) The City shall inspect the site annually during normal operating times. The inspection shall determine if the operation complies with the Conditional Use Permit. If the operator's application conforms to the requirements of this Chapter, and the inspection report indicates compliance with the terms of the CUP and AOP, the Annual Operators Permit may be issued. City of Scandia,Minnesota Page 10 Development Code 6 25 0708-2301-07 SECTION 7. OPERATING CONDITIONS 7.1 Operating Conditions. The following operating conditions and standards must be met for all mining operations. (1) Setbacks. No mining, stockpiling or land disturbance with the exception of screening, shall take place within: (A) 50 feet of adjoining property lines; (B) 200 feet of any existing occupied structures not owned by the operator or owner; (C) 100 feet of any contiguous property subdivided into residential lots of five (5) 10 acres or less, (D) 100 feet of any road right-of-way of any existing or platted street, except the amount of material stockpiled on the effective date of this Chapter may continue but not be expanded. Mining may be allowed up to 50 feet of the road right-of-way so long as the property is restored to 100 feet within one mining season as set forth in the approved reclamation plans, and; (E) If two or more mining operations are contiguous to one another, the common boundary may be mined if the City approves the respective restoration plans. (2) Fencing. Where deemed necessary by the City for the protection of the general public, a fence shall be constructed prior to the commencement of the operation enclosing the area authorized by the permit to be mined. Where fencing is required by the City, said fence shall be, at a minimum, a three strand wire fence and the fence shall be posted with warning signs. The City may require alternative fencing standards if conditions warrant. The fence shall be maintained and shall remain until reclamation is determined to be complete. (3) Hours of Operation. Those portions of the mining operation consisting of excavating, stockpiling, processing, or hauling shall be conducted only between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, unless other hours or days of operation are specifically authorized by the City_, Mining operations shall not take place on holidays. Blasting shall only take place between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Blasting is only permitted with a Certificate of Compliance and with three days notice to the City. In cases of public emergencies, such as road washouts or blockages caused by flooding, adverse weather or other conditions, hours of operation may be extended with the consent of the Mayor, Acting Mayor, or in their absence, the City Administrator. City of Scandia, Minnesota Page 1 1 Development Code 6 25 07078-2301-07 In cases of time constraints on completion of road construction before the end of the construction season caused by adverse weather conditions and in the cases of major road or highway construction projects which cause substantial inconvenience to the traveling public, hours of operation may be extended with the consent of the Mayor or Acting Mayor, or in the absence of the Mayor or Acting Mayor, the City Administrator. Application for extended hours shall be made at least two (2) days prior to the day or days on which extended hours are requested. The applicant shall furnish such information or documentation as may reasonably be requested to support the application. If extended hours are permitted, operations shall be strictly limited to those hours for which permission is granted. (4) Screening. Where deemed necessary by the City, extracting and processing operations shall be screened or located in such a manner as to minimize the impacts on surrounding properties. To minimize the impacts from noise, dust, odors, erosion and visual impacts on surrounding properties, a continuous screen shall be installed and maintained, either along the street or along the perimeter of the visible portion of the area being operated. The following shall serve as the minimum performance standards for screening and may be varied as determined by the City: (A) The screen shall have a total height of not less than six feet and shall consist of one or more of the following types: (l) Walls. A wall shall consist of concrete, stone, brick, tile, or similar type of solid masonry material a minimum of four inches thick. (2) Berms. A berm shall be constructed of earthen materials, and it shall be seeded and mulched as shown on the landscape plan. Plans for berms must be provided that avoid impacts, especially surface water, onto neighboring properties. If berms are constructed of topsoil, they must remain until final reclamation. -Berms must have a minimum slope of 3:1 and have a silt fence at the base closest to the public road or neighboring property. The silt fence shall be maintained until vegetation is established, at which time it shall be removed. No haul roads, either temporary or permanent, material stockpiles or other mining-related activities shall occur on the berm. (3) Fences, Solid. A solid fence shall be constructed of wood and shall form a continuous screen. (4) Fences, Open. An open weave or mesh-type fence, when not used in combination with a berm, shall be combined with plant materials to form a continuous screen. City of Scandia, Minnesota Page 12 Development Code 6 25 07078-2301-07 (5) Planting. Plant materials, when used as a screen, shall consist of dense evergreen plants or a majority of dense evergreen plant materials combined with deciduous plants provided a continuous screen is established. They shall be of a kind or used in such a manner so as to provide a continuous screen within 24 months after commencement of operations in the area to be screened. Plant materials shall not be limited to a maximum height. The Screening Plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. Required screening shall be installed prior to commencement of operations. The City may require that either(1), (2), or(3) above shall be installed if, 24 months after commencement of operations in the area to be screened, plant materials have not formed an opaque screen, or if an opaque screen is not maintained. (B) Required screening shall be setback at least 20 feet from the point of intersection of: (1) A vehicular accessway or driveway and a street; (2) A vehicular accessway or driveway and a sidewalk or trail, and (3) Two or more vehicular accessways, driveways, or streets. (5) Dust Control. The owner must construct, maintain and operate all equipment in such a manner as to minimize on-site and off-site dust conditions. All operations shall meet the standards of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. The driveway access to the sand and gravel operation must be setback at least 25 50 feet from neighboring property lines. The owner, as part of the Conditional Use Permit, must prepare a dust control plan. The operator shall maintain all ways and roads within the site to minimize dust conditions by providing such surfacing or other treatment as may be deemed necessary by the City. The treatment shall produce no potential pollution hazards to the ground and surface waters of the area. All gravel pit access roads shall be provided and maintained with a dustless, non-oiled surface not less than twenty-two (22) feet wide from the connection to a public road to a point within one hundred (100) feet of the loading area. Access roads shall also be constructed and maintained in such a manner that the deposit of earth materials on public roads is minimized. In the event that earth materials are deposited on the public road, the mine operator shall be responsible for clean- up. If the mining operation does not access onto a paved road, the operator shall be responsible for dust control, including application of calcium chloride or other dust retardant.The City may require a blacktopped road if deemed necessary. (6) Noise. All equipment and other sources of noise must operate so as to be in accordance with Federal, State and City noise standards. A noise mitigation plan shall be prepared by the mine operator and provided to the City. City of Scandia,Minnesota Page 13 Development Code 6 25--97078-2301-07 (7) Depth of Excavation. The maximum depth of excavation will be regulated based on groundwater protection and/or the ability to restore the property. (8) Site Clearance. All stumps and other debris resulting from the excavation or related activities shall be disposed of by approved methods. The mine plan must address the disposal of stumps, trees, or other debris. (9) Appearance/Condition. The operator must maintain buildings, processing plants and equipment in a neat condition. Weeds and other unsightly or noxious vegetation shall be controlled as necessary to preserve the appearance of the landscaped area. Existing trees and topsoil along existing public rights-of-way shall be preserved, maintained and supplemented for the depth of the setback or as stipulated in the Conditional Use Permit. (10) Sanitary Facilities. Sanitary facilities through an approved septic system or portable facilities shall be provided. (11) Waste Disposal. Any waste generated from the mining operation, including waste from vehicle or equipment maintenance, shall be disposed of in accordance with Federal, State and City requirements. (12) Water Quality Monitoring. Water quality monitoring when required shall conform to the following standards: Water from monitoring wells and water collected or discharged from the mining area shall be analyzed until one year after reclamation is completed. Samples from monitoring wells shall be taken and testing results submitted prior to the granting of an Annual Operators Permit (AOP). More frequent monitoring and sampling may be required by the City. Sampling and testing shall be done by an independent testing laboratory or an agency chosen by the City. Monitoring wells shall be sealed one year after reclamation efforts are complete if the site is determined to be uncontaminated. Water samples shall be required to be analyzed to determine the level of petroleum products and hydrocarbons. Testing for other contaminates directly related to the mining operation may be required by the City Council. (13) Fuel and Chemical Storage. Any mining operation and related activities must meet Federal, State and City requirements for storage of fuels. The mining operator must prepare a Pollution Prevention Plan and submit it to the City. (14) Contingency Response Plan. The operator shall prepare a Contingency Response Plan (CRP) and employee training to facilitate immediate and remedial response should any accident, release of containment, or other spills occur. The CRP must be on file with the City and its fire department. City of Scandia, Minnesota Page 14 Development Code 6 25 070.78-2301-07 (15) Added Provisions. The operator must comply with such other requirements that the City, from time to time, may find necessary to adopt for protection of the health, safety, welfare and prevention of nuisances in the area. (16) Processing. Any mining operation in which processing is proposed must meet the following performance standards: (A) A Conditional Use Permit or an amendment to an existing Conditional Use Permit is required for any new or existing mining operation which desires to add processing equipment on-site, except as provided in (C) below. (B) The application must include the nature of the processing and equipment, location of the plant, source of water, disposal of water, and reuse of water. (C) Operators who wish to have processing equipment on a temporary basis (processing to be done no more than fifteen (15) working days a calendar year, excluding time for assembly and disassembly) shall apply for a Certificate of Compliance and meet the following criteria: (1) Only materials removed on site are allowed to be processed except recycled material and add rock materials. -No materials may be hauled onto the property for processing, unless all material can be processed during the fifteen(15) day time period. No more than 50%of the material shall be recycled material or add rock on an annual basis. (2) Setbacks as outlined in Section 7.1 (1)must be met. (3) All Federal, State and City air, water and noise standards must be met. (4) Processing shall not take place more than fifteen (15) working days per year. (5) Crushing equipment must be placed in the bottom of the pit area if practical, otherwise located in such a manner as to have the least environmental and aesthetic impact. (D) Operators desiring to have permanent processing equipment (more than fifteen {15} days per year) on site must meet the following standards: (1) All Federal, State and City air and water quality, and noise standards must be met. City of Scandia, Minnesota Page 15 Development Code 6 25 070g8-2301-07 (2) Processing equipment must be screened from view from other property lines and the from public roads. (3) Crushing equipment must be placed in the bottom of the pit if practical, otherwise located in such a manner as to have the least environmental and aesthetic impact. (4) Setback requirements as set forth in Section 7.1 (1) of this Chapter must be met. (E) A temporary processing plant in conjunction with a specific road project, located in the right-of-way or in proximity to the subject road, will be allowed subject to the following conditions: (1) All Federal, State and City air, water and noise quality standards must be met. (2) A Certificate of Compliance must be obtained from the City. (3) The processing equipment must be located so as to minimize its effect on surrounding property owners. (4) The processing plant shall not be on the property for more than 120 calendar days. (5) No materials, outside of the designated right-of-way, may be excavated or removed from the site without a conditional use permit for mining. (6) A bond or other financial guarantee, in an amount determined by the City, must be posted to assure restoration of the site. (17) Recycling. The crushing/processing of used aggregate, concrete and asphalt will be permitted subject to the following conditions: (A) Recycling in conjunction with a specific road project and within the right- of-way or proximity to the subject road, shall be permitted for a maximum of 120 days subject to obtaining a Certificate of Compliance and to the following standards: (1) The processing equipment must be located so as to minimize the effect on surrounding property owners. (2) Site selection shall be made as to minimize the effect on the public health, safety and welfare. City of Scandia, Minnesota Page 16 Development Code 6 25 07078-2301-07 (3) All Federal, State and City air, water and noise quality standards must be met. (B) Recycling in conjunction with an approved mining permit shall be allowed as part of an original or amended Conditional Use Permit subject to the following conditions: (1) Applicable Standards contained in Section 7.1 (14) must be met. (2) An estimate of the amount of material to be processed must be submitted. The stockpile of material to be recycled shall be limited to the amount that can reasonably be processed in two consecutive mining seasons. (18) Trucking Operations. All new mining operations must have access to the pit area from a nine (9) ton blacktop,€+--concrete,or gravel road, or gravel. _The operator shall ensure all loads leaving any pit regulated by this Chapter are loaded so as to comply with state law. Trucks shall clean any loose material from the truck including the tires before leaving the operation. (19) Asphalt Plants and Concrete Ready Mix Plants. A Conditional Use Permit shall be required for any new or existing mining operation that wishes to have a permanent asphalt plant and/or a concrete ready mix plant. Temporary asphalt plants and concrete ready mix plants may be allowed if the following conditions are met: (A) Operators desiring to have a temporary asphalt plant and/or a concrete ready mix plant must meet the following standards. (1) Asphalt plants and concrete ready mix plants must not be on the property for more than fifteen (15) days per year. (2) All setbacks as set forth in Section 7.1 (1) of this Chapter must be met. (3) All Federal, State and City air, water, noise and odor quality standards must be met. An air quality permit must be obtained from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. (4) Equipment must be located in such a manner as to have the least environmental and aesthetic impact. (B) Operators desiring to have a permanent asphalt plant and/or a concrete ready mix plant (more than 15 days per year) must meet the following standards: (1) Asphalt operations and concrete ready mix plants established after the effective date of this Chapter must be located on permitted City of Scandia, Minnesota Page 17 Development Code 6 25 07078-2301-07 mining sites and maintain a setback of 1,000 feet from the property line. (2) All setbacks as set forth in Section 7.1 (1) of this Chapter must be plant on the effective date of this Chapter: in which case, it cannot E�Fta-"1`�1�F1-7�n1Pss + l; '+l +1 �1., t ' r• � i (1) (2.3) All Federal, State and City air, water and noise quality standards If the asphalt operation was in operation on the effective date of this ordinance, it may expand subject to the setbacks set forth in Section 7.1(1) of this Chapter. (3) All Federal, State, and City air, water, and noise quality standards must be met. An air quality permit must be obtained from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. (4) Equipment must be screened and located in such a manner so as to have the least environmental and aesthetic impact. (C) A temporary asphalt plant in conjunction with a specific road project will be allowed subject to the following conditions: (1) All Federal, State and City air, water and noise quality standards must be met. An air quality permit must be obtained from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. (2) A Certificate of Compliance must be obtained from the City. (3) The processing equipment must be located in such a manner so as to have the least environmental and aesthetic impact. (4) Site selection shall be made as to minimize the effect on the public health, safety, and welfare. (5) The asphalt plant shall not be on the property for more than one hundred twenty(120) days. (6) No materials, outside of the designated right-of-way, may be excavated or removed from the site without a conditional use permit for mining. (7) A bond or other financial guarantee, in an amount determined by the City, must be posted to assure restoration of the site. City of Scandia, Minnesota Page 18 Development Code 6 25 07078-2301-07 SECTION 8. RECLAMATION 8.1 The applicant must submit a reclamation plan consisting of graphic representation as required in Section 5 along with the written text. The plan must contain the following elements: (1) Intent of reclamation. (2) Methods and processes of reclamation. (3) Initial condition of mining site. (4) Limits of various operational areas. (5) Phasing and timing of operations and reclamation including areas to be stripped of overburden. (6) Final condition of site, including proposed contours and landscaping. (7) Relation of final site condition to adjoining land forms and drainage features within 1/4 mile. (8) Relation of reclaimed site to planned or established uses of surrounding land. (9) A plan for maintenance of reclaimed area. (10) A detailed cost estimate of reclamation and maintenance. 8.2 Timing. Restoration shall proceed concurrently and proportional to actual mining operations in a continuous manner and will be subject to review and approval at each annual inspection and at the end of the permit period. 8.3 Excavations resulting in the accumulation of substantial water areas after reclamation must meet the following requirements: (1) The water depth must not be less than three feet (3' 10') measured from the low water mark, unless a plan for creation of a wetland or marsh has been approved. (2) All banks shall be sloped to the water line at a slope which shall not be steeper than four(4) feet horizontal to one(1) foot vertical. (3) All banks shall be surfaced with soil of a quality at least equal to the topsoil of land areas immediately surrounding and to a depth of at least four(4) inches. Sodding or seeding and mulching are also required. Mulch must be properly anchored. City of Scandia,Minnesota Page 19 Development Code 6 25 070g8-2301-07 (4) Such topsoil as required by Subsection three (3) above shall be planted with trees, shrubs, legumes or grasses; (5) Slopes on reclaimed areas shall not be steeper than four(4) feet horizontal to one (1) foot vertical, except in cases where non-erodible conditions are present and the City approves the reclamation plan. (6) In man-made groundwater lakes, the bottom contour shall be gradually sloping from the shoreline to the deepest portion of the water body with a maximum slope of 6 feet horizontal to 1 foot vertical for at least 100 feet from the proposed shoreline toward the center of the water body. Beyond 100 feet in horizontal distance, the slope of the bottom contours may be no steeper than 3 feet horizontal to 1 foot vertical. ordinances. Department of Natural Resources guidelines for surface water 8.4 Excavations not resulting in water areas after rehabilitation but which must be graded or backfilled, shall meet the following requirements: (1) Fill shall be inspected and certified as being clean (free of volatile organic compounds,aheavy metals, or other contaminants)before being used for reclamation. Organic soil shall be used only for topsoil. (2) Such grading or back-filling shall be made with non-noxious, nonflammable, noncombustible solids; (3) The graded or backfilled area shall not collect or permit stagnant water to remain therein; (4) The peaks and depressions of the area shall be reduced to a gently rolling topography in substantial conformity to the land area surrounding and which will minimize erosion due to rainfall; (5) Such graded or backfilled area shall be surfaced with soil of a quality at least equal to the topsoil of land areas immediately surrounding, and to a depth at least four(4) inches; (6) Such topsoil as required by 7.4 (5) above shall be planted with trees, shrubs, legumes or grasses. (7) Slopes on reclaimed areas shall not be steeper than four(4) feet horizontal to one (1) foot vertical, except in cases where non-erodible conditions are present and the City approves the reclamation plan. City of Scandia, Minnesota Page 20 Development Code 6 25 07078-2301-07 (8) All rehabilitation areas which are planned for building purposes shall have a final elevation at least 10 feet above the normal ordinary groundwater level. Plans for on-site septic systems must be considered. If area is backfilled for purposes of future development, the soil must be compacted, and subsequently tested by a registered soils engineer and approved. 8.5 Drainage. Reclamation shall proceed in such a way that natural and storm drainage, where it enters and leaves the premises, shall be altered only to the least degree necessary to carry out excavation and related activities. Any alteration of natural and storm drainage shall not adversely affect public roads or neighboring uses. 8.6 Cover and Planting. The reclamation area shall be planted with grass, trees, shrubs, crops, or other vegetation to prevent erosion and provide for screening and natural beauty. Technical assistance and soils data should be obtained from the appropriate county and state officials, conservation districts, and the nearest soil conservation service office. 8.7 Topsoil. When topsoil is stripped or removed, it must be set aside on the site for re- spreading over the excavated area. These overburden stockpiles must be used to minimize the effects of erosion of wind or water upon public roads, streams, or adjacent land uses and shall not be sold or removed from the property. 8.8 Removal of Structures. Within a period of six (6) months after the termination of a mining operation, or within six (6) months after abandonment of such operation for a period of six (6) months, or within six (6) months after expiration of a sand and gravel permit, all buildings and other structures not otherwise allowed under the Zoning Ordinance must be removed from the property and the property restored in conformance with the reclamation plan. SECTION 9. INSURANCE, FINANCIAL GUARANTEES AND FEES 9.1 Insurance. The operator shall provide proof of bodily injury, property damage, and public liability insurance in the amount of$1,000,000 for any occurrence, including blasting insurance if blasting is allowed as part of the permit. 9.2 Escrow. The Applicant for a CUP shall establish a non interest bearing account with the City in the minimum amount of$10,000.00 to secure the payment of administrative, engineering and legal costs incurred by the City in connection with the application. If the escrow is insufficient, the Applicant shall make such additional deposits as may be required by the City. The City shall have the right to reimburse itself from the escrow. Any excess amounts remaining in the escrow shall be reimbursed to the Applicant within sixty(60) days after the approval of the application provided that all City expense invoices have been received. If for any reason, escrow funds are insufficient to cover City costs, the Applicant shall reimburse the City for all of such costs upon receipt of an invoice therefore. Upon the failure of the Applicant to make payment of such invoice City of Scandia,Minnesota Page 21 Development Code 6 25 O70-78-2301-07 within 30 days of receipt of the invoice, the City may reimburse itself from the escrow account. The Applicant shall be responsible for the payment of all administrative, engineering and legal costs incurred by the City in connection with the application. The applicant for an AOP shall establish an escrow of$2-5,000. Additionally, the applicant shall, upon receipt of an invoice, reimburse the City for inspection costs and any required dust control and nuisance abeatement costs incurred by the City in approving the AOP or administering the permitted mining operation.. 9.3 Financial Guaranty. To assure compliance with the provisions in this Chapter, the completion of reclamation and restoration of the site, and the performance of the operator's obligations set forth in the CUP, the operator shall provide to the City an Irrevocable Letter of Credit or other security satisfactory to the City in the amount to be determined by the City. The operator shall be entitled to a reduction in the security amount on a dollar for dollar basis as reclamation is completed and approved by the City engineer, except that the security shall not be reduced below an amount equal to 125%of the cost of the work to be completed as determined by the City Engineer nor below 5%of the security, unless the reclamation has been accepted by the City. To obtain a reduction in the security the operator will give notice to the City of completion of a portion of the reclamation or fulfillment of its requirements. The City Engineer will inspect the completed improvements within ten (10) working days of the operator's notice, and, provided the engineer approves the completed reclamation or fulfillment of requirements, the reduction in the security will occur on a dollar for dollar basis within five (5) working days after the City Engineer's approval subject to the limitations stated above. If the security does not automatically renew, then at least thirty(30) days prior to the expiration of the security, the operator shall provide the City with a new security for a period of at least one (1) year beyond the expiration date of and for the same amount as the security then in effect or the operator shall be in default hereunder with no opportunity to cure, and the City may immediately demand from the surety the amount of the security then in effect. Any security provided under this section shall permit the City to draw upon the security immediately following any operator default hereunder that is not cured within any applicable notice period and for such portion thereof as is certified by the City Engineer to be reasonably necessary to cure such default. Any request for a security reduction shall be accompanied by mechanics lien waivers covering completed work. 9.4 A permit fee of$500 }-shall be paid with the application for a CUP. A permit fee of $500 shall be paid with the application for an AOP. An AOP will not be issued unless all outstanding fees and taxes are paid. City of Scandia, Minnesota Page 22 Development Code 6 25 O7078-2301-07 SECTION 10. VIOLATIONS, PENALTIES AND INSPECTION 10.1 Any firm, person or corporation who violates any of the provisions of these regulations shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be subject to a fine and/or imprisonment as provided by law. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. 10.2 In the event of a violation or threatened violation of any of the terms of this Chapter, the City may take appropriate action to enforce these provisions, including application for injunctive relief, action to compel performance or other appropriate action in court if necessary to prevent, restrain, correct or abate such violations or threatened violations. Upon motion, the court may award costs, disbursements and reasonable attorney's fees and witness fees, which costs and fees can be assessed against the land. 10.3 Whenever necessary to enforce any of the provisions of this Chapter or whenever there is reasonable cause to believe that a violation of this Chapter has occurred or is about to occur, an authorized agent of the City may enter any building or upon any premises at all reasonable times to inspect the same or to perform any duties imposed by this Chapter, provided that if such building or premises be occupied, the authorized agent shall first present proper credentials and demand entry and if such building or premises be unoccupied, shall first make a reasonable effort to locate the owner or other persons having charge or control of the building or premises and demand entry. If such entry is refused, the City shall have recourse to every remedy provided by law to secure entry, including administrative and judicial search warrants. SECTION 11. TERMINATION OF PERMIT 11.1 Any Conditional Use Permit or Annual Operators Permit granted pursuant to this Chapter may be revoked for a violation of any provisions of this Chapter or any conditions of the permit. 11.2 Revocation shall not occur earlier than ten (10) working days from the time written notice of revocation is served upon the permittee or if a hearing is requested, until written notice of the City action has been served on the permittee. Notice to the permittee shall be served personally or by registered or certified mail at the address designated in the permit application. Such written notice of revocation shall contain the effective date of the revocation, the nature of the violation or violations constituting the basis of the revocation, the facts which support the conclusions that a violation or violations have occurred and a statement that if the permittee desires to appeal, the permittee must, within ten (10) working days, exclusive of the day of service, file a request for a hearing. The hearing request shall be in writing, stating the grounds for appeal and served personally or by registered or certified mail on the City Clerk by midnight of the tenth working day following service. Following the receipt of a request for hearing, the City Clerk shall set a City of Scandia,Minnesota Page 23 Development Code 6--2-5-070g8-2301-07 time and place for the hearing, and the hearing shall be conducted in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter I, Section 7.8, of the Scandia Development Code. 11.3 A mining operation shall not be permitted to continue solely for the purpose of maintaining a bituminous or ready mix concrete plan or for crushing, washing, recycling or other processing operations. Upon removal of all commercially reasonable quantities of material from the mining site, the mining operation shall cease, all equipment and structures shall be removed and reclamation of the site shall be promptly completed. Failure to remove commercially reasonable quantities of material from the site for a period of two consecutive years shall constitute a presumption that the mining on the site has been completed, unless the operator has renewed the AOP yearly. SECTION 12. EFFECTUATION 12.1 It is hereby declared to be the intention that the several provisions of this Chapter are separable in accordance with the following: (I) If any court of competent jurisdiction shall adjudge any provision of this Chapter to be invalid, such judgment shall not affect any other provisions of this Chapter not specifically included in said judgment. (2) If any court of competent jurisdiction shall adjudge invalid the application of any portion of this Chapter to a particular property, building, or other structure, such judgment shall not affect the application of said provision to any other property, building or structure not specifically included in said judgment. SECTION 13. REPEALER 13.1 Any ordinance or provision of an ordinance heretofore existing pertaining to the subjects treated in the Chapter shall be deemed repealed from and after the effective date of this Chapter except as they are included and reordained in whole or in part in this Chapter; provided that this repeal shall not affect any right established prior to the effective date of this Chapter or the provisions of any valid permit issued prior to the effective date of this Chapter. City of Scandia,Minnesota Page 24 Development Code Carnelian-Marine Watershed District Scandia Plaza 11,21150 Ozark Ave.P.O.Box 188,Scandia,MN 55073 July 10, 2007 Anne Huriburt, Administrator City of New Scandia 15727 209th Street No. P.O. Box 128 Scandia, Minnesota, 55073 Re: CMWD Comments on Proposed Mining Ordinance For the City of Scandia Dear Ms. Hurlburt: Thank-you for the opportunity to provide Camelian Marine Watershed District(now the Carnelian Marine St. Croix Watershed District)input at the June 10, 2007, public hearing on the New Scandia Mining Ordinance. Most of the previous comments we have provided have been addressed. In addition to those previous comments please consider the following additional comments in the development of your ordinance. 1. The Carnelian Marine Watershed District currently requires a permit for mining operations to bring them into compliance with the Districts requirements. It was the policy of Washington County that mining permit applicants first had to meet the requirements of the local Watershed District. a. Will New Scandia be following a similar process? Paragraph 5.2 (9)(N)requires consistency with local water management plans. We assume this includes the Watershed District requirements. Consistency with the District plan and requirements will be documented by the District through issuance of a District Permit. b. The District would be interested in coordinating our review into the City's permit process. This coordination could be done at staff level and the process formalized in a "Memorandum of Understanding"between the City and District. This would help avoid duplication of review efforts and expenses for both the City and District. c. The District has already developed significant hydrologic, natural resource inventory, comprehensive wetland inventory data that is available to the City for there review efforts. d. In reference to Paragraph 5.4, if two adjacent mining operations propose to excavate the common walls and the total exceeds the 160 acres mentioned is a mandatory Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)required as called for in this paragraph? If two or more adjacent mining operations are proposed the EIS should probably be required regardless if common wall excavation is proposed initially, as long as it appears likely that the 160 acre standard would be reached by the combination of the two operations. 2. The District's primary concerns are stormwater quantity and quality management and the protection of District resources. a. The proposed Mining Ordinance requires stormwater management plans for both the interim mining activities and the ultimate development of the site. b. Stormwater management plans need to include subwatershed maps delineating all drainage areas that drain to or through the property as well as for the property itself. c. Proposed mining and grading activities should not significantly change subwatershed divides. Impacts to both on-site and off-site resources need to be given consideration (i.e. if the majority of the drainage area to wetland is diverted the effect could be the loss of that wetland, or a Managers John Bower Douglas Pratt Richard Caldecott Victoria Dupre cto. KrnnmmPr IA111PC CIi i I I"rJPriel \4 9Mt CMSCWD - (Comments on Scandia mining Ordinance) 7/10/07 Page 2 portion of it.). The opposite would be if the amount of drainage to a wetland is significantly increased, that could also affect the character of that wetland. 3. The District is also concerned about the protection of the groundwater and groundwater dependent natural resources as was mentioned at the workshop. a. District policies do not currently allow mining within 3-ft of the groundwater. This is in conflict with the City's proposed ordinance refer to previous District comments for additional information. b. If the proposed mining activity is going to create a groundwater lake or wetland it should be regulated as a groundwater dependent natural resource. The created lake, during construction and following final restoration should be classified and treated as a Natural Environment Lake. The 1000-ft shoreland zone should be established from the proposed OHW of the lake and proposed activities within that zone(except excavation)should be regulated in accordance with the shoreland zoning regulations. c. The minimum required 3-borings is probably not enough to define the character of the groundwater and determine necessary groundwater protection requirements. d. A minimum of at least one monitoring well down gradient of the mining operation should be required even if groundwater is not used in the mining operations. Contaminants could still be introduced into the groundwater as a result of the mining operation. Additionally groundwater monitoring wells maybe needed between groundwater dependent natural resources and the mining activities. e. Regardless of whether or not a gravel mining operation actually goes into the groundwater the soils involved are highly permeable,and a direct conduit into the shallow aquifer. The removal of the vegetation and overburden make the risk of contamination that much greater. Therefore it is very important that each mining operation have well designed and implemented surface and groundwater management plans. It's also important that the plan include operations and maintenance plans for those facilities. f. Paragraph 7.1 (12)monitoring parameters for nitrates,pesticides and herbicides were removed from the previous document and should be put back in as an optional requirement by the City Council based on the specific conditions for each proposed mining activity. Please feel free to contact me at(651) 770-8448 if you have any questions on this comment letter. Sincerely, Daniel A. Fabian, P.E. CMSCWD Engineer cc: CMSCWD Board of Managers Richard Thompson/Berry Farrington, TKDA(Scandia Planner) Jyneen Thatcher, WCD rk= l� i -I ITILLER Tiller Corporation and its operating divisions CORPORATION Barton Sand&Gravel Co. Commercial Asphalt Co. Corporate Office: Barton Enterprises,Inc. PO Box 1480 7200 Hemlock Lane,Suite 200 general:(763)425-4191 facsimile:(763)425-7153 Maple Grove,Minnesota 55311 web: www.tillercorp.com July 10, 2007 Dick Thompson TKDA 444 Cedar Street, Suite 1500 Saint Paul, MN 55101-2140 Re: City of Scandia Mining and Related Activities Regulations Dear Mr. Thompson: Tiller Corporation would like to thank you and the City of Scandia for giving us the opportunity to comment on the proposed mining regulations. It appears that this process is nearing completion and we believe the final document will benefit the community and citizens as well as the mining industry. Below are comments and suggestions we have regarding the June 25, 2007 version of the regulations. Page 1, 2 PP cement should be changed to concrete ready-mix to be accurate and consistent with the language in the remainder of the ordinance. Page 2 Section 3 PP (2) The last sentence should be removed and replaced with If a complete permit application is not submitted within 90 days after the Chapter is adopted, all mining operations shall cease and the property restored in accordance with the provisions of the approved reclamation plan. Page 2, Section 3, PP (4) (A) This Company is an Equal Opportunity Employer July 10,2007 Page 2 of 3 Add the phrase in italics to clarify... The property (which may consist of more than one parcel with more than one owner) is at least 40 contiguous acres in size. Page 3 Section 4 4.1 (4) Change cement to concrete ready-mix to be accurate and consistent with the remainder of the ordinance. Page 8 Replace PP 5.3 with PP 5.6. Replace PP 5.4 with that portion of 5.3 to read: "An Environmental Assessment Worksheet shall be required for any operation in which mining is proposed below the groundwater level. The City will be the responsible governmental unit for the preparation of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (Chapter M.S. 4410.4300 Subpart 12.) The City may require an Environmental Assessment Worksheet if available evidence indicates that the proposed operation may have the potential for significant environmental effects." Page 8 PP 5.7 1st sentence: Replace will with may to be consistent with the language within the remainder of the paragraph and with the PP 5.8. This is also important because currently the MPCA does not issue noise permits. They have noise standards which must be followed, but no specific permit. Page 10, Section 7.1(1)(C) During the June 5, 2007 meeting, it was agreed that the original language of 5 acres or less would remain. This change did not get incorporated into the latest draft. Replace 10 with 5. Page 16 PP 19 (B) (1) Discussion on June 5, 2007 was that the setback would be from occupied structures existing at the time of application. The 1,000 foot setback from the property line makes Tiller Corporation's plant nonconforming and eliminates the ability for it to expand, even though the plant is located well over 1,000 feet from the neatest occupied structure(1,400' +/-). Also the 1,000 foot setback requires that only sites with 160 acres or more (more or less) can operate an asphalt plant or a ready-mix plant and only then if they put it right in the middle of the property. This requirement seems overly burdensome. The paragraph also limits permanent asphalt plants and ready-mix plants to locations associated with permitted mining operations. Is this really the City's intention or desire? In July 10, 2007 Page 3 of 3 many communities, ready-mix plants and asphalt plants are located on property as stand alone operations typically on parcels of property encompassing 10 -20 acres located within appropriate zoning districts. Page 18 PP 8.3 (1) Remove -10' ....less than three feet(3"-1-01) measured from the ... Again, thank you for your consideration and the opportunity to comment. Respectfully, Tiller Corporation Michael Caron Director of Land Use Affairs c: Anne Hurlburt, Scandia City Administrator J; /7 n bi' -7 _/ ? Comments on Scandia Mining Ordinance - July 10, 2007 First - in Section 6.2 Annual Operators Permit I recommend that the mining operator be required to include in its application a list by date of all violations charged against the operator during the past year from all federal and state agencies, and also by the county and city. Having this information will be useful to determine if and under what conditions the operator should be allowed to operate for the coming year. If, for example, there have been repeated violations, the city should consider what additional remedies are needed to address the repeated violations. Second, - in Section 8.3(7) Reclamation There is a statement that any groundwater lakes and wetlands created will be subject to the Shoreland Management ordinance and other ordinances. First of all I think it goes without saying that however the property will be reclaimed, that the property will be subject Scandia's ordinances. What is of special concern is pre -annointing the property as subject to the Shoreland ordinance. By doing so, the ordinance will allow more intensive development than the adjoining properties because shoreland manamgement districts have higher densities allowed than normal agriculture zoning does. The reference to shoreland management should be stricken from this section. Third - in Section 7.1(1)(A) Operating Conditions There is currently a setback requirement of 50 feet. You have gotten recommendations from various parties including me that the setback should be 100 feet. I think that would be a small change that would help avoid claims that have been made recently the setback has been violated. There has also been issues raised about what does the setback mean. Tiller for example has said that the setback only applies to mining activities and would not apply to road building and berms. A 100 foot setback is a reasonable approach to avoiding complaints from adjoining property owners. Regardless, this section needs to be clarified that all activities by the operator, including roads and berms are not allowed within the setback. Fourth - in Seciton 7.1(19)(B)(1) Operating Conditions This section requires that asphault operations and redimix plants must be setback 1000 feet from property lines. I would also recommend, for the purposes of groundwater safety that a 1000 foot setback for asphault and redimix operations also apply to any / a Z -Ide f% .7-/6 -6;7 excavation below the water table. As we all know groundwater protection has not been handled very well by those that regulate and protect groundwater from contamination. Unfortunately, governmant has found out that the water resource has been contaminated long after it has occured. A 1000 foot setback from an asphault plant would help to protect groundwater from accidents that can happen despite efforts that people make to avoid them. COMMENTS ON C, '- CITY OF SCANDIA DEVELOPMENT COD t/ � CHAPTER 4 r 6�00/ MINING AND RELATED ACTIVITIES bA.scq 4,6 DRAFT DATED 6-25-07 Submitted by Bill Clapp, 19955 Quinnell Ave. N., Scandia MN 55073. 651 433-5514 Mineral extraction operations of the sort covered by the proposed ordinance, benefit the area receiving the product of the mining operation, but do little or nothing for the well- being, economic and otherwise, of the sending community. Therefore the ordinance provisions should assure that Scandia is in no way degraded, or its citizens' lives in- vaded, or its natural amenities harmed, by mining operations. Section 1.1. (2) Add "and processing" after removal. Section 1.1 (3) Change "mined or adjacent property" to "mined and other property". The word "adjacent" is too narrow a term. If my property is damaged by the mining op- eration, it should make no difference how near or far it is to the operation. Section 3.1 (4) What does "change in use" mean? I suspect it means adding process- ing or asphalt facilities. Section 3.1 (4) (A). Why should there be any minimum size? The small the better, I should think. Although maybe 40 acres is necessary to allow for all required setback distances. Section 3.1(5) This provision should be deleted. Or limited to those cases where the applicant can show that the standards as written would constitute a hardship, as that term is used in zoning law. In other words, no waiver from standards will be approved unless without it the proposed operation would be infeasible. Section 7.1 (1) (A) through (E). The setback requirements should apply to screening as well as mining, stockpil- ing and other land disturbances. (A) should be 100 feet, not 50 feet. The latter is a terribly short distance. (A) should apply to both property lines and road rights of way. And in the case of roads, to all such, public or private, platted or not. And if public, be they town, city county, or state. With (A) so amended, (C) should be dropped. (D) is an unnecessary complica- tion, and should also be dropped. Thus I propose changing 7.1 (1) to read (1) Setbacks. No mining, stockpiling, processing, screening, or land disturbance shall take place: (A) Within 100 feet of of other property, or of the outer limit of the right of way of state, city, county, or town roads. (B) Within 200 feet of any existing occupied structures not owned by the operator or owner. (C) It two or more mining operations are contiguous , the common bound- ary may be mined if the City approves the respective restoration plans. Section 7.1 (4) In the introductory paragraph, the introductory clause "Where deemed necessary by the City" should be dropped. No mining operation will ever be so located that other properties will never warrant screening from it. Section 7.1 (4) (A) Given the size of trucks and machinery that will be in the mined area, the screen height should be 8 feet, not 6. The screen should always be an earthen berm. Mining operations are only allowed in Agriculture zoned parts of the City. In those areas, walls and fences would be out of place, and there would always be room for berms. Thus I would drop the provisions for walls and fences. And I would add a slope requirement for the berms - 3 or 4 horizontal to 1 vertical - so that they are stable and non-erosive. Section 7.1 (4) (A) (5) Vegetation on the berms is good where it is consistent with neighboring vegetation. Evergreen materials would seldom if ever be consistent in Scandia. And if not evergreen, the planted materials would not work as a screen, for the half of the year when leaves are fallen. Therefore I would drop (5) entirely, but augment the Berms paragraph by adding "and vegetated consistent with their surround- ings so as to make the berm visually inconspicuous" Section 7.1 (4) (B) With the setbacks I recommend above, this provision can be dropped. Section 7.1 (6) What would a noise mitigation plan consist of? The big problem with noise is monitoring. It should be required randomly but frequently, and be conducted by a professional with the city's costs for such paid for by the operator. Reliance on land- owner complaints won't work. Section 7.1 (16) (D) (2) Should say ". . . screened from view from other property and from public roads". Section 7.1.(16) (D) (3) I assume that crushing equipment is a kind of processing equipment, and therefore subject to (2) immediately above as well as to (3) Section 7.1 (17) (B) (1). The reference to 7.1 (14) seems incorrect. Section 7.1 (19) (B) (1) Change from "the property line" to "property lines and public roads". Section 8.8 speaks to removal of structures after "termination" of the operation or its "abandonment". Section 11.3 speaks of"removal of all commercially reasonable quanti- ties of material" These terms are not defined. And renewal of the AOP yearly seems to allow the operator to avoid having to complete reclamation indefinitely. This all needs to be tightened up. A mining pit could linger on for years without any activity just by the operator claiming there is still gravel there which can be mined, and by keeping up his AOP. I assume - I hope - that these rules as applied to the Zavoral gravel pit would require that a restart of mining there would be treated as a brand new operation, requiring a permit the same as a new one, and that all theses rules would apply without him having any cognizable pre-existing mining operation claim. If my assumption is wrong, then the rules should be adjusted to make my assumption correct. Thank you for considering these ideas. Bill Clapp / ��Oi� J /,77 ���l� ote City of Scandia; W11y RECEIVED Re-. Mining ilttisnant=;e TIi{ 10i) JUL I Public Hearing CITY OF SCANDIA 1. wiuniturinu wells: ike: sections 3 and i Comment: much discussion to do with placement and location, no discussion on following' A. Establishment of basellne l3 Who monitors? C. Allowable variance D. Consequence of a variance E. Well report should be submitted with AO?request ?. Dredge Mining L.Omment: no discussion }ssion A. Should disallow hydraulic mining .` B. Allow mechanical mining C. Nocd to establish limits of cut(depth) 3. Environmental worksheets: Re: section 5,paragraph 5.3 and 5.4 Comment: why is the city responsible for preparation of Environmental Assessment Worksheets as well as Environmental Impact Statements. Believe city is the approving authority of such. 4. Dirty trucks: Re; section 7,1 paragraph 18 Comment: clean tires and covered loads. City should have enforcing authority. 5. Language: Re: section 7.1 paragraph 18 ----access to the pit-firea facilities b. Language: Re: section 8.3 paragraph 1 ---- less than 3 feet( 3' -1 U' Conflict in meaning Respectfully Submitted; .dim Van i io ven Page 1 of 1 Anne Hurlburt From: Bill Clapp [gusclapp@qwest.net] Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 5:05 PM To: Anne Hurlburt Subject: Mining ordinance I will be out of town almost all of August, and so not able to attend hearings on the new mining ordinance. Therefore I submit written comments on the draft dated 7/27/07. Section 3.1 (5) reads: "The standards which apply to these permits may be varied by the City according to the structure and size of the operation, and to factors presented by the mine operator and other interested parties." This is way too broad. It enables the city council to waive all screening requirements, or oppositely to require a 12 foot high screen, without giving the city any standards on which to base such variances from the terms of the ordinance. I recommend that the paragraph be dropped entirely. Permit applicants can be given the right to seek variances according to the variance provisions of the city's Development Code. Section 7.1 (1) (D)must be amended. It now reads (D) 100 feet of any road right-of-way of any existing or platted street, except the amount of material stockpiled on the effective date of this Chapter may continue but not be expanded. Mining may be allowed up to 50 feet of the road right-of-way so long as the property is restored to 100 feet within one mining season as set forth in the approved reclamation plans, and; In the first line, change "...right-of-way of' to "...right-of-way or". Without that change, the setbacks do not apply to roads, but only to streets. Section 7.1 (1) exempts screenings from the setback provisions. As written, a screening berm or a wall can be built right on the property line or right-or-way line. Certainly the next door neighbor should get as much breathing space from the berm or screening wall built next door, as it is from a house built next door. And the public roads should get equally respectful treatment. The preferable approach is to apply the setback rules to screens the same as to all Dther aspects of mining operations. A fallback suggestion is to require screens to set back 50 feet from roads and streets and property lines. Thank you for including these suggestions as testimony at the next hearing on the draft mining ordinance. 3i11 Clapp 19955 Quinnell Ave. N. 3candia MN 55073 i51 433-5513 ;usclapp@qwest.net 3/1/2007 Meeting Date: 8/7/2007 Agenda Item: !-./l .) Planning Commission/City Council t✓ `. Agenda Report City of Scandia 14727 209`h St. North Scandia, MN 55073 (651) 433-2274 Action Requested: Hold a public hearing on the application of Jennifer Cates, Cates Fine Homes, for a variance to allow for an accessory structure 2,130 square feet in area and to allow the structure to be two stories, for the TenEyck residence located at 13500 182nd Street North. Deadline/ Timeline: 60-day review expires September 14, 2007 Background: The planner will present the attached report and recommendations at the hearing. Recommendation: The planner has recommended denial of the variance. The findings in the report have been incorporated into a draft resolution for use by the Commission and City Council. Should the Commission and Council determine that the variance should be approved, staff recommends that findings and conditions be drafted in a resolution to be adopted at a subsequent City Council meeting. Attachments/ • Draft resolution for denial (No. 08-07-07-01) Materials provided: • TKDA Memorandum dated July 25, 2007 • Application • Applicant's Narrative dated July 16, 2007 • Concept Images • Survey and Building Plans Contact(s): Jennifer Cates, Cates Fine Homes (651 439- 2844) Prepared by: Anne Hurlburt, Administrator (2007016 variance teneyck) Page 1 of 1 08/01/07 CITY OF SCANDIA, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 08-07-07-01 DENYING VARIANCE REQUEST FOR 13500 182ND STREET NORTH WHEREAS,Jennifer Cates, Cates Fine Homes has made application for a variance for accessory structure area and number of stories to allow for an accessory structure 2,130 square feet in area and to allow the structure to be two stories, located at 13500 182nd Street North; and WHEREAS, the property is legally described as follows: The Bluffs of East Bay, Lot 5, Block 1, Washington County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request at a duly noticed Public Hearing on August 7, 2007, and has recommended denial; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCANDIA, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does deny the request of Jennifer Cates, Cates Fine Homes for a variance, based on the following findings: 1. There is adequate space on the site to build a one-story accessory structure of 2,000 square feet in size, which would meet the standards of the Zoning Ordinance and for which no variance would be needed. In this manner, the property may be put to reasonable use without a variance. Therefore, a hardship is not present. 2. There are no unique circumstances of the property that would prevent construction of an accessory structure which meets Ordinance standards. It appears that the two-story structure is proposed based on a preferred design; the requested variance is not based on hardship due to unique circumstances of the property. 3. The proposed two-story accessory structure, in its size, massing, and due to its proposed separate driveway, would have the appearance of a second primary structure. This would be out of character with the area. Adopted by the Scandia City Council this 7th day of August, 2007. Dennis D. Seefeldt, Mayor ATTEST: Administrator/ City Clerk TKDA 444 Cedar Street,Suite 1500 Saint Paul,MN 55101-2140 ENGINEERS•ARCHITECTS•PLANNERS (651)292-4400 (651)292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com MEMORANDUM To: City Council Reference: TenEyck Variance Request Planning Commission City of Scandia, Minnesota Anne Hurlburt, Administrator Copies To: Robert TenEyck Proj. No.: 13812.006 Jennifer Cates, Cates Fine Homes From: Richard E. Thompson, AICP Routing: Berry Farrington, AICP Date: July 25, 2007 SUBJECT: TenEyck Variance Request MEETING DATE: August 7, 2007 LOCATION: 13500 182nd Street North The Bluffs of East Bay, Lot 5, Block 1 Scandia, Minnesota APPLICANT: Jennifer Cates, Cates Fine Homes ZONING: Agriculture (AG), Shoreland Overlay District 60-DAY PERIOD ENDS: September 14, 2007 ITEMS REVIEWED: Application Certificate of Survey Architectural Plans Applicant Letter dated July 16, 2007 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST: The Applicant requests variances to allow a two-story accessory structure that exceeds the area limit of 2,000 square feet. The Applicant proposes an accessory structure of 2,130 square feet, the total area of both floors. The subject property is approximately 3.7 acres located at 13500 182nd Street North on the southeast shore of Big Marine Lake. There is an existing single family home on the property. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity TenEyck Variance Request Page 2 July 25, 2007 City of Scandia EVALUATION OF THE REQUEST: Setbacks Big Marine Lake is classified as a Recreational Development Lake. The lake's Ordinary High Water level (OHW) is 942.2 feet, and the required setback from the OHW is 100 feet. A bluff is present on the subject property and a bluffline setback of 30 feet is required. The required yard setbacks are: front yard of 40 feet, side yard of 10 feet, and rear yard of 50 feet. On Recreational Development Lakes, the front yard faces the water. In addition, a 40 foot setback from the public right of way is required. The survey shows that all setback requirements are met. Buildable Area One acre of contiguous buildable land is required. The survey indicates areas that are not buildable, including areas within setbacks and steep slopes. The survey reports a buildable area of 1.68 acres, meeting the buildable area standard. Impervious Surface A maximum of 25% of the lot area may be impervious. The Applicant reports that the total existing and proposed impervious surfaces equals 8,675 square feet, or 5.5% of the site, below the impervious surface limit. Building Height The maximum building height is 35 feet. The proposed accessory structure is approximately 25 feet tall, meeting the height standard. Accessory Structure Requirements Section 9.2 of the Scandia Zoning Ordinance regulates accessory structures. For a parcel 3 to 5 acres in size, the maximum accessory structure total square footage is 2,000 square feet. Section 9.2(A) states, "All accessory structures shall be limited to one story in height."The Applicant requests a variance to allow for an accessory structure 2,130 square feet in area (combined area of both floors) and to allow the structure to be two stories. The Ordinance does not allow accessory structures to be located closer to the right of way than the principle structure except in certain circumstances. The proposed accessory structure is not located closer to the right of way than the principle building. Section 9.14 regulates building type and materials, including accessory structures. On parcels of 4 acres or less, metal siding is prohibited, and accessory structures must resemble the principle building. The application indicates that the proposed materials for the accessory structure are stone and lap siding, meeting the design standards. TenEyck Variance Request Page 3 July 25, 2007 City of Scandia Evaluation of Hardship The Applicant describes the hardship in a letter dated July 16, 2007. The existing home is 1,100 square feet without space for a home office or exercise room. The purpose of the accessory structure is to provide space for these uses. Variance requests are evaluated based on whether strict enforcement of the Ordinance would create hardship. There are three components to hardship, and the request must meet all three components. I. That the property cannot be put to reasonable use Accessory structures are an allowed secondary use within the AG and Shoreland Districts. However, an accessory structure conforming to the maximum of 2,000 square foot area and single story requirements could be built on the site, providing for reasonable use. The Planners find that a variance is not required to put the property to reasonable use. 2. That the hardship is due to circumstances unique to the property, not created by the landowner. The proposed variance is not based on unique circumstances of the land, such as topographic or wetland constraints. The circumstances described in the Applicant's letter relate to the need for additional space and the purpose of the accessory structure. However, the landowner's need for extra space could be met through building an accessory structure meeting Ordinance standards, or by building an addition onto the house. There is an adequate site on the property to construct a one-story, 2,000 square foot accessory structure without a variance. The Planners find that there is not hardship due to circumstances unique to the property. 3. That granting of the variance would not alter the essential character of the area The Comprehensive Plan's goals call for maintaining a "rural lifestyle" environment. The Applicant's letter indicates that the proposed accessory structure is designed to be tucked into the topography of the lot, that the two-story design limits the number of trees to be removed, and that the building type and materials are consistent with the rural setting. However, the proposed structure has approximately the same size building footprint as the principle structure, and separate driveway for the accessory structure is proposed for the accessory structure. The Planners find that the proposed accessory structure is out of character in that it would have the appearance of a second primary structure due to the size of the accessory structure in comparison to the house, that it is proposed as a two-story structure, and that it has its own separate driveway. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Comments Comments have not been received to date. Any comments should be addressed. Carnelian Marine Saint Croix Watershed District Comments Comments have not been received to date. Any comments should be addressed. TenEyck Variance Request Page 4 July 25, 2007 City of Scandia ACTION REQUESTED: The Planning Commission can recommend: 1. Approval 2. Approval with conditions 3. Denial with findings 4. Table the request PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: The Planners recommend denial of the variance request to allow a two-story accessory structure of 2,130 square feet,based on the following findings: 1. There is adequate space on the site to build a one-story accessory structure of 2,000 square feet in size, which would meet the standards of the Zoning Ordinance and for which no variance would be needed. In this manner, the property may be put to reasonable use without a variance. Therefore, a hardship is not present. 2. There are no unique circumstances of the property that would prevent construction of an accessory structure which meets Ordinance standards. It appears that the two-story structure is proposed based on a preferred design; the requested variance is not based on hardship due to unique circumstances of the property. 3. The proposed two-story accessory structure, in its size, massing, and due to its proposed separate driveway, would have the appearance of a second primary structure. This would be out of character with the area. File No. `)Oo 1 /l6 APPLICATION FOR PLANNING AND ZONING REQUEST City of Scandia, Minnesota 14727 209th Street North, PO Box 128, Scandia, MN 55073 Phone 651/433-2274 Fax 651/433-5112 Web http://www.ci.scandia.mn.us Please read before completing: The City will not begin processing an application that is incomplete. Detailed submission requirements may be found in the Scandia Development Code,available at the City office and website(www.ci.scandia.mn.us)and in the checklist forms for the particular type of application. Application fees are due at the time of application and are not refundable. 1. Property Location: (street address, if applicable) 13500 1gZ= S+ t• 2. Washington County Parcel ID: 3�} o37-2-o330o lc\ 3. Complete Legal Description: (attach if necessary) RJ6H oc t 4. Owner(s): Phone: c--L (h) k1 3 3 Z k 3 (b) Street Address: VQ0 I �Z—`' S-t— E-Mail: City/ State: �a.A.,, C ro 1 )(- Zip: S6 G -7 5. Applicant/Contact Person: Phone: 1 ��1-e l )-`e (h) j..eiet At. (b) c.1 Street Address (Mailing): /Z-(v S. Z GI-- E-Mail:J jti,` 2- e c atAtsA^e-f-e1'►v . cam City/ State: S- 1 J j- /1.& Lf Zip: S S o f Z 6. /Requested Action(s): (check all that apply) v Variance Minor Subdivision Conditional Use Permit Planned Unit Development Interim Use Permit Preliminary Plat/Major Subdivision Certificate of Compliance(Residential) Preliminary Plat/Open Space Conservation Subdivision Certificate of Compliance(Commercial) Final Plat Map Amendment(Zoning or Comprehensive Plan) Permit Extension 1/5/2007 7. Brief Description of Request: (attach separate sheet if necessary) &2—Q, &:i2:,,,e'0 C-,-1.1.40 Cl/ 8. Project Name: robcff -Fey) E y c k ie S / Inc c I hereby apply for consideration of the above described request and declare that the information and materials submitted with this application are complete and accurate. I understand that applicants are required to reimburse the city for all out-of-pocket costs incurred for processing, reviewing and hearing the application. These costs shall include, but are not limited to: publication and mailing of notices; review by the city's engineering, planning and other consultants; legal costs, and recording fees. An escrow deposit to cover these costs will be collected by the city at the time of application. Any balance remaining after review is complete will be refunded to the applicant. No interest is paid on escrow deposits. PLEASE NOTE: If the fee owner is not the applicant, the applicant must provide written authorization by the fee owner in order for this application to be considered complete. Property Fee Owner Signature(s) Date: -7 .-Th . ( — 1 S — 0-) Applicant Sigdatures' / Date: 9,brui; PA4L-c46-A- d 7 � For City Use Only Application Fees: 156 -,—e--Q ,L .toy , PAID Parcel Search Fee: 63 1 c JUL 1 6 Z007 Escrow Deposit: c S�O / CITY OF SCANDIA 1/5/2007 7/16/07 Robert TenEyck Residence 13500 182nd St N, Marine on St Croix, MN Brief description of variance request: Variance for a 2 story accessory building and variance for 130 square feet (building is 2,130 sq. ft.; allowed is 2,000 sq. ft) Description of hardship: Homeowner is currently living in a 1,100 square foot space that does not accommodate room for either a home office or exercise room. The variance is being requested so that the homeowner may telecommute from a space that is separate from the main living area as well as a space that provides a more productive business environment. (Note: this is not a business that requires having clients visit the home). The exercise room is a practical solution for health maintenance. There is no suitable exercise club within reasonable proximity. Some architectural points to consider during your approval process: 1, The property is at the end of a cul-de-sac and virtually includes the entire cul-de- sac so disturbing neighbors should not be an issue 2. The building is located over 4 times the required setback from the adjacent private property 3. The structure will be tucked at the base of the hillside that slopes up to the neighboring private property, therefore the scale of the second story will not overwhelm the setting 4. The addition of a second story cuts the amount of the impervious footprint in half therefore limiting the amount of trees that need to be removed 5. The building height of a one-story building with a medium pitched roof would exceed the current two-story design 6. The building is not a prefabricated or metal pole barn structure. We are trying to tie into the aesthetic of the original home using natural material, like stone and simple lap siding. The colors will also be brown and more earth tone to compliment the setting. 7. The outline of the building is a "shed" design that blends in well with a rural setting. ...;,.,.. .,, -.. ,..,.._ , 0 t. ,rairor -,a-iii irsialliffil . '' --'.411111111".•••••.--ibteir iPIIIII111:11111!:11171.1166-1111111111111117111i111111"7.0.0.--:•':: :4•;::',..4;mai_LIN___1511_11.111M11111111111111111111111111 _ 7___I_ ....'41miloommo••••••'..7-'- '.. ..,_,.,,,-,,,, --:•71,,, -::gre, ....r.,,..„,„,...,„,,,,. _• vi....•••;...... ._ .. Wri ,•;000 ,,--......• '•••... _..i.: piionli -Tirol .. .,, . - 41_14 ----4----I- -,-,r• :.-_-.; 0011111111 i - '..-"' ---L__I____ 0510.111111111[C,4}' :- ' 11101111 111111111111 NIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII l';':''' 1-----4----1---- *4*Iligia._ ,,wit,„,,,,k7.0„..:„,,,.5_ ..,440,14,:.,.• . .,r 4.,..„ -, • . -rr ,$'-•-rr• , -: -ir- " ••-- 'wvzii43---$4-••-t,•,;,:- ..- ";:,-;-%,4-.-,.'4,:.s.,,,x..!• ;3, ,,,•-3•:-. •-••'' TligiF1-4•;•:4C1f.:QT*)'30'.friaq't-,[4:1i4Z* ''• ' •i A-Vt.:1•?--,X;;;-•,-..,K-,34,,A.:.... -,-., - .. 4,50.,T07-7r.:,,,:;. :4•--6-; ,-,::: 41:c-f,',5. -.@_.-,'11, '- --:-:--4.4,v,-..4,04.1g;,.4,,z',v,4: .',4,ir.an,1-klet.4,,-. . . :-. -.-.-,,--. ..„,::, ,,,,i,..,...,,.•,-...-,-;;::.,..,,,.-:,:-,"::,,.:.::,. .,„..,.,-.,,,,,: -,,.,.,--ga,- ,.:4,0-a5s.,-aKt.,..-..-1,,,,,,:, -;:v.',.._..- ?-' . . . _ . . -,. . .• .• •144:',ri:•-.--.4:0 .,4•;I:lf I" •4' ' ': • .. r-•-.:: -..-,.. r • ,. ., ., .-, ,- ' . _-.- •,'"4:-;,•3:•-•.-...7,-zr:-...........--,, ,,z,z .. „ , . „ INN,, I sas O .-.. ' - '.':. . - • -.-..114111111.111111•=1.111 M il IMMIIIIISI' ME .'' ..,.. —- 11111 I Inr A s OW'. •-•'' No Nam Nown1111111111111 el 1 II _......_. i—mlini Inn 4 rill-rw r i MN 7-i 111.1111111, ..ni •... rc. lir... 11"r-if: wein - ....afar.... Melt:111111 C.: - ' ,:.,. lip "Illaki 411111111f I) / Concept Images 1--- TenEyck Studio/Home Office I RECEIVED michael huber archtiects 06.01.07 JUL 1 8 ?007 CITY OF SCAND1A b) GI Carnelian-Marine-St Croix Watershed District Scandia Plaza II,21150 Ozark Ave.P.O.Box 188,Scandia,MN 55073 August 2, 2007 Anne Hurlburt, Administrator City of New Scandia 15727 209th Street No. P.O. Box 128 Scandia, Minnesota, 55073 Re: CMSCWD Comments on TenEyck Variance Request Big Marine Lake Subwatershed Management Area CMSCWD Comment No. 07-013 Dear Ms. Hurlburt: It is our understanding that the proposed variances are for the constructing a 2 story accessory building and for a variance of for 130 square feet in addition to the 2,000 square feet allowed. The following Carnelian-Marine-St. Croix Watershed District(CMSCWD) comments pertain to the referenced variance request. The CMSCWD's primary concerns are for general erosion and sediment control and possible bluff impacts. Please provide copies of CMSCWD comments to the City Planning Commission for consideration at their August 7, 2007, meeting. 1. Proposed project does not require a permit from the CMSCWD. Lot is located in the Shoreland Bluffs of East Bay Subdivision which was previously reviewed and accepted by the then Carnelian Marine Watershed District. Requested variances are not related to the shoreland ordinance, or bluff area. 2. Big Marine Lake is the number one priority lake in the CMSCWD, with a water quality rating of"A", and an overall management of"protection". 3. Lot coverage computations were not provided. 4. The Certificate of Survey/Plan Sheet identifies slopes greater than 25%. However, the County Shoreland Ordinance defines bluffline as having a slope greater than 18%. The top of bluffline should be determined and the building location evaluated to make sure it meets the 30-ft structure setback requirement. 5. A grading and drainage plan is needed for this project. Infiltration practices, raingardens or other Best Management Practices should be used to limit the additional concentrated discharge onto the steep bluff slopes. Watershed District technical assistance through the Washington Conservation District would probably be available to the applicant. Managers John Bower Richard Caldecott Victoria Dupre Steve Kronmiller James Shaver Frederick Markw ardt Douglas Pratt CMSCWD - (TenEyck Variance Request) 08/02/2007 Page 2 6. Project will need an erosion and sediment control plan and final site restoration plan. Please feel free to contact me at (651) 770-8448 if you have any questions on this comment letter. Sincerely, Daniel A. Fabian, P.E. CMSCWD Engineer cc: Bob TenEyck, Owner/Applicant John Bower, CMSCWD Board Member Steve Kronmiller, CMSCWD Board Member Richard Thompson/Berry Farrington, TKDA (Scandia Planner) Location Map N 41-it 'tarn d. .F {9 ^` i fit' fli1a Mar intL3kr r ; - C07-0134 e+ Tot1Eyck Vari iv:c v, 115130 ts2rsn .r ,Zir — . ° 1, vc V Y � Awe =$ rIa EComments 2007 � ^1 Soclrn Ines . r a _ Upstream en0 of i1ruc ur. Dowrlgraem and LYI iNlrctt,ro 10 rout t:t nrOW s summe==iFt`IF a , x, -ram J 107 POO 1 }' ` —"2 root tantovs ;:onnwp a or?i C:a1 Mn4i:77 alp!Cn Aiwa!t 4(17 CATM'PFRtl4I7 DRUC.AAMiraIS'U+nccfirnmmartb [!'mar Meeting Date: 8/7/2007 • Agenda Item: /1 c) /96_, . c) C Planning Commission/City Council Agenda Report City of Scandia 14727 209`h St. North Scandia, MN 55073 (651) 433-2274 Action Requested: Hold a public hearing on the application of Richard Grekoff, West Lake Builders for variances for setback from the Big Marine Lake Ordinary High Water level (OHW), front yard setback, maximum impervious surface area, minimum lot size, road frontage, and buildable area to allow construction of a new single family home for Allen and Penny Lepinski on property located at 12614 182nd Street North. Deadline/ Timeline: 60-day review expires September 15, 2007 Background: The planner will present the attached report and recommendations at the hearing. Recommendation: The planner has recommended approval of the variances, except for the request for impervious surface coverage exceeding 25%. The findings and conditions recommended in the report have been incorporated into a draft resolution for use by the Commission and City Council. Attachments! • Draft resolution (No. 08-07-07-02) Materials provided: • TKDA Memorandum dated August 1, 2007 • Application • Applicant's Narrative dated July 19, 2007 • Deed/ sketch of septic system site • Letter from Hult & Associates dated July 20, 2007, re: pervious pavers for driveway • Surveys, Existing and Proposed • Building Plans Contact(s): Richard Grekoff, West Lake Builders, Inc. (715) 386-4878 Prepared by: Anne Hurlburt, Administrator (2007017 variance Iepinski) Page 1 of 1 08/01/07 • CITY OF SCANDIA, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 08-07-07-02 VARIANCE REQUEST FOR 12614 182ND STREET NORTH WHEREAS, Richard Grekoff, West Lake Builders has made application for variances for setback from the Big Marine Lake Ordinary High Water level (OHW), front yard setback, maximum impervious surface area, minimum lot size, road frontage, and buildable area to allow for a new single family home, located at 12614 182nd Street North; and WHEREAS, the property is legally described as follows Lot 12, Big Lake View Third Addition, together with that part of vacated 182nd Street North accruing thereto, according to the recorded plat thereof, Washington County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request at a duly noticed Public Hearing on August 7, 2007, and has recommended approval for the variances for setback from the Big Marine Lake Ordinary High Water level (OHW), front yard setback, minimum lot size, road frontage, and buildable area; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended denial of a variance for maximum impervious surface area; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCANDIA, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request of Richard Grekoff, West Lake Builders for the variances for setback from the Big Marine Lake Ordinary High Water level (OHW), front yard setback, minimum lot size, road frontage, and buildable area, based on the following findings: 1. The lot is a pre-existing lot not meeting the dimensional standards in the current Zoning Ordinance. Strict enforcement of the setback from the Big Marine Lake Ordinary High Water level, rear yard setback, minimum lot size, road frontage, and buildable area would greatly limit residential use of the property, a use allowed by the zoning district. 2. The dimensions of the property are existing circumstances unique to the property. Resolution No.: 08-07-07-02 Page 2 of 3 3. Because the proposed home meets the same setback from the Ordinary High Water level as the existing cabin, and because the proposed home is within two feet of the existing cabin's front yard setback from the west property line, and because the proposed home does not alter the buildable area, lot size or road frontage, granting the variances would not alter the essential character of the area. FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED, that the following conditions of approval shall be met: 1. That the impervious surface area not exceeds 25%of the lot area. If the Iot area within the driveway easement is to be considered as part of the total lot area for this purpose, and the shared driveway is to be removed from this area, then the Applicant must provide the City with documentation that the shared driveway will be located off of the property and cannot be relocated back onto the property in the future. 2. That the individual sewage treatment system be approved by Washington County Department of Public Health and Environment. 3. That the Applicant work with the Carnelian Marine Saint Croix Watershed District to further explore the suitability of a pervious paver driveway in this location and demonstrates a suitable credit in calculating the impervious surface area. To not include the driveway within the calculation of maximum impervious surface, the Applicant needs to prove that the driveway would be designed, installed and maintained to be functionally equivalent to a vegetated surface. 4. That a landscaping plan showing proposed vegetation alterations be provided when the Applicant applies for a building permit from the City. The plan should show any trees to be removed and replacement trees as regulated by the Shoreland District. 5. That the Carnelian Marine Saint Croix Watershed District permit is granted. 6. That the lowest floor elevation must be at least 945.00 feet. 7. That a grading, drainage,and erosion control plan be submitted. 8. That the Applicant works with the Washington Conservation District and the Carnelian Marine Saint Croix Watershed District and plants a shoreland buffer of native vegetation for shoreline stabilization and stormwater quality treatment. 9. That any comments received from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, if any are provided in advance of the Applicant receiving a building permit, are addressed. 10. That all fees and escrow payments are made. FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED, that it should and hereby does deny the request for a variance from the maximum impervious surface area, based on the following findings: Resolution No.: 08-07-07-02 Page 3 of 3 I. Under the impervious surface requirement which allows up to 25% lot coverage, there is adequate area for impervious surfaces associated with residential use. 2. The request to exceed the maximum impervious surface area is based on the proposed home design, not due to circumstances unique to the property. 3. Granting of the variance to allow greater than 25% impervious surface would alter the essential character of the area. The purpose of the impervious surface maximum is to reduce runoff to the lake and to allow for infiltration of precipitation and therefore protecting water quality. Adopted by the Scandia City Council this 7th day of August, 2007. Dennis D. Seefeldt, Mayor ATTEST: Administrator/City Clerk TKDA 444 Cedar Street,Suite 1500 Saint Paul,MN 55101-2140 ENGINEERS•ARCHITECTS•PLANNERS (651)292-4400 (651)292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com MEMORANDUM To: City Council Reference: Lepinski Variance Request Planning Commission City of Scandia, Minnesota Anne Hurlburt, Administrator Scandia File Number 2007017 Copies To: Allen and Penny Lepinski Proj. No.: 13812.007 Richard Grekoff, West Lake Builders Routing: From: Richard E. Thompson, AICP Berry Farrington, AICP Date: August 1, 2007 SUBJECT: Lepinski Variance Request MEETING DATE: August 7, 2007 LOCATION: 12614 182nd Street North Big Lake View, Third Addition, Lot 12 and Part of Government Lot 5 Scandia, Minnesota APPLICANT: Richard Grekoff, West Lake Builders 1714 Crestview Drive Hudson, Wisconsin 54016 ZONING: Agriculture (AG), Shoreland District 60-DAY PERIOD ENDS: September 15, 2007 ITEMS REVIEWED: Application and description of request Certificate of Survey, Existing and Proposed Conditions Hult and Associates letter dated July 20, 2007 Pervious paver details Declaration of easements for shared driveway Proposed home elevations Septic system site documents BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST: The Applicant requests variances to allow construction of a new single family home, to replace an existing cabin, at 12614 182nd Street North located on Big Marine Lake. The variance requests are for setback from the Big Marine Lake Ordinary High Water level (OHW), front yard setback, maximum impervious surface area, minimum lot size, road frontage, and buildable area. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Lepinski Variance Request Page 2 August 1, 2007 City of Scandia BACKGROUND: There is an existing cabin on the property with a front and rear deck, a porch, a free standing garage, and a shed. The survey shows a 2 foot wide walking path from the garage to the lake. All of these features are proposed to be removed. The footprint of the existing structures, decks, porch, and path is 1,740 square feet. There is an existing driveway which serves four properties that is partially located within a shared driveway easement crossing the west part of the property. The driveway easement coincides with vacated 182nd Street and is held by the Applicant and the property owners to the north, south, and west. The northern portion of the driveway is on the Applicant's property and not within the easement. The proposed single family home will have an attached garage, porch, deck, and front steps. The footprint of the proposed structure is 3,807 square feet. Using the Scandia Development Code definition of building height, the structure measures approximately 23 feet in height from the highest ground level to the average height of the highest gable. EVALUATION OF THE REQUEST: Summary of Variance Requests Below is a summary of the Scandia Development Code requirements and the variances requested. Type of Required Existing Proposed Variance Request Front yard setback 40 feet Approximately 28 feet Approximately 26 feet (west property line) Big Marine Lake 100 feet Approximately 40 feet Approximately 40 feet OHW setback (Recreational Development Lake) Impervious Surface 25%maximum Approximately 13% Approximately 28% Minimum lot size 2.5 acres .37 acre .37 acre Road Frontage 150 feet Zero Zero Buildable area 1 acre Less than .37 acre Less than .37 acre Setbacks The Applicant requests variances for front yard and OHW setbacks. The front yard setback requirement is 40 feet and the OHW setback is 100 feet. For waterfront lots on a Recreational Development Lake, the front yard faces the water. The lot has double frontage and so the front yard setback is also applied on the west side of the lot. The front yard setback requirement is met on the lake side of the property but not on the west side of the property where the driveway is located. Lepinski Variance Request Page 3 August 1, 2007 City of Scandia The Applicant proposes a front yard setback of approximately 26 feet between the proposed structure and the west property line, and an OHW setback of approximately 40 feet. The proposed setbacks are similar to the front and OHW setbacks of the existing structure. The proposed structure is 2 feet closer to the west property line than the existing structure. The shore impact zone is the area within 50 feet of the OHW (a distance half of the OHW setback). All vegetative alterations requirements of the Shoreland District apply in this area. The Planners recommend that a landscaping plan showing proposed vegetation alterations be provided when the Applicant applies for a building permit from the City. The plan should show any trees to be removed and replacement trees. Ten foot side yards are proposed, meeting the Shoreland District minimum required side yard setback. The existing structure has side yards of 15 and 30 feet. The front yard setback requirement is 40 feet, and the proposed structure meets this setback on the lake side of the lot. The variances for OHW and front yard setbacks and the case of hardship are evaluated below. 1. That the property cannot be put to reasonable use The lot is a pre-existing lot not meeting the dimensional standards in the current Zoning Ordinance. Strict enforcement of the 100 foot OHW setback and the 40 foot front yard setback, would result in a small building envelope (approximately 1,000 square feet), limiting the area for residential use of the property, a use allowed by the zoning district. 2. That the hardship is due to circumstances unique to the property, not created by the landowner. The dimensions of the property and the resulting limited area that meets all setback requirements are existing circumstances unique to the property. 3. That granting of the variance would not alter the essential character of the area Because the proposed home meets the same setback from the OHW as the existing cabin, and because the proposed home is within 2 feet of the existing cabin's front yard setback from the west property line, the Planners find that granting the setback variances would not alter the essential character of the area. There are single family homes to the north and south of the property, which are larger than the existing cabin. The Planners recommend conditional approval of the OHW and front yard setbacks. Impervious Surface The Shoreland District states that a maximum of 25%of the lot may be covered with impervious surface. In order to fall below the impervious surface area maximum, the Applicant has proposed moving the existing gravel driveway off of the subject property to the western half of the shared driveway easement, located on the neighboring property. The feasibility of moving the driveway is not clear to date, due to the steepness of the topography and due to lack of information regarding agreement among the easement holders of the plan to move the driveway. While it is possible that the property owner may move the driveway to the portion of the easement located off of the lot, there is nothing to prevent the adjoining property owner from moving the driveway back onto the subject property within the easement. Lepinski Variance Request Page 4 August 1, 2007 City of Scandia Without definitive evidence that the driveway will not be located on the subject property, the Planners are deducting the easement area of 1,520 square feet from the property's lot area with regard to consideration of impervious surface. Therefore, the lot area above the OHW and outside of the driveway easement is 13,818 square feet. The Applicant proposes an impervious surface area of 3,807 square feet, not including the driveway, or 28% impervious. This calculation also does not include the proposed pervious paver driveway in the total impervious surface area. (See the discussion of the driveway and pervious pavers later in the memo.) The survey reports that the existing cabin and other impervious surfaces are 1,740 square feet, or 13%of the 13,818 square foot area. A variance for impervious surface would be needed to construct the proposed house. The variance for impervious surface and the case of hardship are evaluated below. 1. That the property cannot be put to reasonable use Under the impervious surface requirement which allows up to 25% lot coverage, there is adequate area for impervious surfaces associated with residential use. The property has an existing house and the property has an impervious surface of 11% of the lot. 2. That the hardship is due to circumstances unique to the property, not created by the landowner. The request to exceed the maximum impervious surface area is based on the proposed home design, not due to circumstances unique to the property. 3. That granting of the variance would not alter the essential character of the area The Planners find that granting of the variance to allow greater than 25% impervious surface would alter the essential character of the area. The purpose of the impervious surface maximum is to reduce runoff to the lake and to allow for infiltration of precipitation and therefore protecting water quality. The Planners recommend denial of the variance request to allow impervious surface in excess of 25%of the lot. Lot size, Road Frontage and Buildable Area The proposed home does not affect the site's lot size, road frontage, or buildable area. The lot is .37 acres and so does not conform to the 2.5 acre lot size standard. Because this portion of 182nd has been vacated, the property does not have any road frontage. Due to the size of the lot, the buildable land area is much less than the required one acre. These are conditions unique to the property and the fact that it is a pre-existing lot which does not meet these Ordinance standards. The Planners find that there is a case of hardship in that strict enforcement of the lot size, road frontage, and buildable area standards would prevent single family residential use of the property. The Planners recommend conditional approval of the variance requests for lot size, road frontage, and buildable area. Individual Sewage Treatment System The Applicant obtained an easement on a property located to the south (the Freiberg property) for the purpose of an off site individual sewage treatment system. The system site is approximately 500 feet away from the proposed house, located on the west side of 182nd Street. The proposed system site is Lepinski Variance Request Page 5 August 1, 2007 City of Scandia approximately 300 feet from Big Marine Lake. There is an existing system on the subject property located to the south of the cabin, which will be removed. The Planner has inquired with Washington County Department of Public Heath and Environment regarding the feasibility of this arrangement. The County has communicated that the proposed system is technically feasible but with design challenges related to draining of the pipe and designing the pipe so that it is below the frost depth. The individual sewage treatment system must be approved by Washington County Department of Public Health and Environment. Driveway The Applicant proposes a pervious paver driveway extending from the shared driveway to the proposed garage. General information about the pervious pavers and installation were provided, and the Applicant's engineer provided a letter explaining design assumptions and the functionality of a pervious paver driveway in this location. Because soils in the area are seasonally saturated, the letter reports that a one to two foot base layer of rock with a 40% void ratio (air pockets to temporarily hold water) would be needed to handle a 10-year storm event. Soil borings and additional design work, as well as a maintenance plan, are needed to ensure a functional pervious paver driveway. The Planners recommend that the Applicant work with the Carnelian Marine Saint Croix Watershed District to further explore the suitability of a pervious paver driveway in this location and demonstrate a suitable credit in calculating the impervious surface area. In order to exclude the driveway from the calculation of maximum impervious surface, the Applicant needs to prove that the driveway would be designed, installed, and maintained to be functionally equivalent to a vegetated surface. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Comments Comments have not been received to date. Any comments should be addressed. Carnelian Marine Saint Croix Watershed District Comments Draft comments were received by the Planners, and full comments will be provided to the City. The draft comments indicate that an increase in impervious surface is not supported by the Watershed District. The Planners recommend that the following Watershed District comments are included in any conditions of approval: that the lowest floor elevation must be at least 945 feet; that a grading, drainage, and erosion control plan be submitted; and that the Applicant plants a shoreland buffer of native vegetation for shoreline stabilization and stormwater quality treatment. ACTION REQUESTED: The Planning Commission can recommend: 1. Approval 2. Approval with conditions 3. Denial with findings Lepinski Variance Request Page 6 August 1, 2007 City of Scandia 4. Table the request PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: The Planners recommend approval of the variances for setback from the Big Marine Lake Ordinary High Water level, rear yard setback, minimum lot size, road frontage, and buildable area, based on the following findings: 1. The lot is a pre-existing lot not meeting the dimensional standards in the current Zoning Ordinance. Strict enforcement of the setback from the Big Marine Lake Ordinary High Water level, rear yard setback, minimum lot size, road frontage, and buildable area would greatly limit residential use of the property, a use allowed by the zoning district. 2. The dimensions of the property are existing circumstances unique to the property. 3. Because the proposed home meets the same setback from the OHW as the existing cabin, and because the proposed home is within two feet of the existing cabin's front yard setback from the west property line, and because the proposed home does not alter the buildable area, lot size or road frontage, granting the variances would not alter the essential character of the area. The Planners recommend approval with the following conditions: 1. That the impervious surface area not exceeds 25%of the lot area. If the lot area within the driveway easement is to be considered as part of the total lot area for this purpose, and the shared driveway is to be removed from this area, then the Applicant must provide the City with documentation that the shared driveway will be located off of the property and cannot be relocated back onto the property in the future. 2. That the individual sewage treatment system be approved by Washington County Department of Public Health and Environment. 3. That the Applicant work with the Carnelian Marine Saint Croix Watershed District to further explore the suitability of a pervious paver driveway in this location and demonstrates a suitable credit in calculating the impervious surface area. To not include the driveway within the calculation of maximum impervious surface, the Applicant needs to prove that the driveway would be designed, installed and maintained to be functionally equivalent to a vegetated surface. 4. That a landscaping plan showing proposed vegetation alterations be provided when the Applicant applies for a building permit from the City. The plan should show any trees to be removed and replacement trees as regulated by the Shoreland District. 5. That the Carnelian Marine Saint Croix Watershed District permit is granted. 6. That the lowest floor elevation must be at least 945.00 feet. 7. That a grading, drainage, and erosion control plan be submitted. 8. That the Applicant works with the Washington Conservation District and the Carnelian Marine Saint Croix Watershed District and plants a shoreland buffer of native vegetation for shoreline stabilization and stormwater quality treatment. Lepinski Variance Request Page 7 August 1, 2007 City of Scandia 9. That any comments received from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, if any are provided in advance of the Applicant receiving a building permit, are addressed. 10. That all fees and escrow payments are made. The Planners recommend denial of the variance for impervious surface area,based on the following findings: 1. Under the impervious surface requirement which allows up to 25% lot coverage, there is adequate area for impervious surfaces associated with residential use. 2. The request to exceed the maximum impervious surface area is based on the proposed home design, not due to circumstances unique to the property. 3. Granting of the variance to allow greater than 25%impervious surface would alter the essential character of the area. The purpose of the impervious surface maximum is to reduce runoff to the lake and to allow for infiltration of precipitation and therefore protecting water quality. File No. gOO 7 O 1 APPLICATION FOR PLANNING AND ZONING REQUEST RECEIVED City of Scandia, Minnesota JUL 1 7 ZOO] 14727 209th Street North,PO Box 128, Scandia, MN 55073 651/433-2274 Facsimile Machine 651/433-5112 OF S IA pleting: The City will not begin processing an application that is incomplete. Detailed submission requirements may be found in the Scandia Development Code,available at the City office and website(www.ci.scandia.mn.us)and in the checklist forms for the particular type of application. Application fees are due at the time of application and are not refundable. 1. Property Location: (street address, if applicable) LA 6 1)4 11 ? d ice. i /bR.4-A— i'r1luRJnc. (5 zoa)) ►'nn . 55s'7 2. Washington County Parcel ID: 3-03al0 -3� - 6. o ,i 3. Complete Legal Description: (attach if necessary) Z-041a ea., Lake_ Vf f0 -t—h;,e.d one `r Waal- bf eocve len(Teo& Lp t- (5ee 14 oda) 4. Owner(s): Phone: l4l1E-� f�.nnj (h) 715- 38to - � 7 (b) Street Address: �n���� �.url� E-Mail: City/ State: II � l ztcL, .“/ u64-01 b Ztp: . " Q 6 5. Applicant/Contact Person: Phone: �,.a kcl £Aofr (h) N✓15'L i-' k, •& I dEAS /^✓d-: (b) '7r - 49/73/ Street Address (Mailing): / 7/ e Lk E-Mail: ) 4 Q. 141e-141(e - i Ickei esal City/State: Zip: _64 pl 4 lvilu cisDx, Witt 6. Requested Action(s): (check all that apply) 5t Variance Minor Subdivision Conditional Use Permit Planned Unit Development Interim Use Permit Preliminary Plat/Major Subdivision Certificate of Compliance(Residential) Preliminary Plat/Open Space Conservation Subdivision Certificate of Compliance(Commercial) Final Plat Map Amendment(Zoning or Comprehensive Plan) Permit Extension Text Amendment(Zoning or Comprehensive Plan) Other 7. Brief Description of Request: (attach separate sheet if necessary) 8. Project Name: I hereby apply for consideration of the above described request and declare that the information and materials submitted with this application are complete and accurate. I understand that applicants are required to reimburse the city for all out-of-pocket costs incurred for processing, reviewing and hearing the application. These costs shall include,but are not limited to: publication and mailing of notices; review by the city's engineering,planning and other consultants; legal costs,and recording fees. An escrow deposit to cover these costs will be collected by the city at the time of application. Any balance remaining after review is complete will be refunded to the applicant. No interest is paid on escrow deposits. PLEASE NOTE: If the fee owner is not the applicant,the applicant must provide written authorization by the fee owner in order for this application to be considered complete. Property Fee Owner Signature(s) ) Date: GS=0 c - -- ( --.Q.f4"-'1L-: ac-Adq,k,'.6e i Applicant Signature(s)- "-? Date: Pf ,...,s,ict: v( 41(=S‘/- Z. kt- lout('cc-y c. . -,(— For City Use Only Application Fees: ( SOU V. pt.-1-- Parcel Search Fee: 3 19(11A- 7 PAID Escrow Deposit: 1 JUL 17 Z007 CITY OF SCANDIA RECEIVED JUL i 9 ZOO] Project Description and Variance Request _CITY OF scAcvoIA Attached please find the house and site plan (survey) for the construction of our proposed home on our lot at 12614-182"d Street in the City of Scandia on Big Marine Lake. We currently have a small seasonal cabin on our lot and wish to improve the lot with a home in which we hope to reside year round. The current cabin is not useable to live in as a full time residence. The home we wish to build is 2469 square feet in size with part of the garage space built as a tuck under and a 3rd stall garage built out to the right (south) side which creates a side yard set back of 10' on each side of the home. There is no front yard set back requirement since 182"d Street was vacated. The rear of the proposed home (lakeside) is in the same approximate location (set back) as the exiting cabin. Please note that the existing structures, both the garage to the front and cabin to the rear are close to the same set backs as the proposed new home. The current lakeside set back of 100 feet is apparently a newer requirement since the total lot depth was only 110 feet. The 100 foot set back would virtually wipe out the total buildable area for the lot. While the proposed home of 2469 square feet is not necessarily small or cabin-like it is still of a size that is complementary and comparable to the other homes in the neighborhood. Many of the neighbor homes are much closer to both lot lines as well as the lakeshore. In order to rebuild this home on our lot we need to ask for a variance from the current set back and coverage requirements. The lot is 100 feet wide leaving 60 feet of buildable area based on side yard set backs. The depth of the lot on the south line is 110 feet. The current set back requirement of 100 feet from the water and 20 feet from the front completely eliminates any buildable area. In the process of designing our home we are using a plan that allows 10 feet to the side lot lines and 50 feet to the lake. This is the approximate building area that we currently occupy with our existing cabin. We are only asking that we may use the lot in the same way it is currently being used. The proposed home is comparable to that of our neighbors in both size and set back usage. Our neighbors are supportive of our project and what we are doing. In addition to our lot we have acquired the land on the west side of our driveway for the construction of a new septic system which will be well outside of any set back requirements. CONTRACT FOR DEED Form No. 55-M Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks(1978)Miller-Davis Co.,Minneapolis Individual(s)to Joint Tenants • No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate of Real Estate Value ( )filed ( )not required , 19_. County Auditor By Deputy (reserved for recording data) MORTGAGE REGISTRY TAX DUE HEREON: (reserved for mortgage registry tax payment data) Date: August 19 97 THIS CONTRACT FOR DEED is made on the above date by Eunice L. Burk, Trustee (marital status) Seller (whether one or more), and Allen M. Lepinski and Penny W. Lepinski , Purchasers, as joint tenants. Seller and Purchasers agree to the following terms: 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION. Seller hereby sells, and Purchasers hereby buy, real property in Washington County, Minnesota, described as follows: Lot 12, Big Lake View Third Addition, together with that part of vacated 182nd Street North accruing thereto, according to the recorded plat thereof, Washington County, Minnesota together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto (the Property). 2. TITLE. Seller warrants that title to the Property is, on the date of this contract, subject only to the following exceptions: (a) Covenants, conditions, restrictions, declarations and easements of record, if any; (b) Reservations of minerals or mineral rights by the State of Minnesota, if any; ..„t,a;ar;c;nn lawn and regulations: ---, /vop A 5 0,91,e v SE1' Tic Sy5Ta' 54-ALc / ': 7-a 7- ,S/TE Ar , P'9 'X 50 FT 13euro kew FRY//3GRG PROPefiTv T/v rile �R/N6 • /d 2 ND 5r LAY vT a• /NARI MF LAke 11E/2/ AY OT L///5s • V PINSK! _- 1 NoR TN y r i. so iIt BIG /V)APINE LA,tr s /3H z RuRT-oN �q re 3r s/TE BN 3 84 • • 1 ON 3 l o BN • P2 � rf s or ueR resr �r Y 14 /25 sr SITE • 95 L4 �/ �ypls �`!� • Q ..— Pi _ 0 L EO/N SAI Trs r b s/Ts 3A rT 2 f5 (F/ • • ro sy ----- _ - (Do Fr WDDDED 8N QH 5/TE 4 T7 7 5 f r ,-. .•.tip _ H U LT & ASSOCIATES, INC. Surveyors, Engineers &Wetland Specialists P.O Box 37 Telephone:651-464-3130 Forest Lake, MN, 55025 Facsimile: 651-464-4822 hult@mfra.com hi IN 20. 2007 Allen and Penn Lepinsk i CIO Dick Grekoff West Lake Builders. Inc PO Box 703 'Judson. WI 54106 Subject Pervious Pavers for Driveway Lot 1 Big Lake View 3''' Addition, Washington County Huh 06167 Dear Mr. Lepinski. Huh and Associates. Inc has been asked to analyze and assess the feasibility of installing pen ions pavers for the dritowav of this lot and to make recommendations to the Client and the Cite regarding the construction of the driveway that may guide in the development of this propcm. The Citt has indicated that the would like to see infiltration designed into the pervious pavers design. Before a design of the dri‘ewav constructed with pervious pavers can be engineered. it's necessar.:to research the soils and groundwater table on the property. In the interest of time. the soils were determined from the Soil Survey of Washington and Ramsey Counties for Minnesota rather than performing soil borings and percolation tests. The soil survey indicates the soils are of type 1033 — Udifluvents. These soils are classified in a hydrologic group as a Type C soil. The property tract is located in the Carnelian Marine Watershed District In a phone conversation with Dan Fabian (6.I-770-8448. Watershed District Engineer)- he agreed with using the infiltration rates for Type C soils set forth by the Minnesota Pollution Control AgeneN (MPCA). li, provide infiltration equivalent to a vegetated lawn. a has layer er of I-2 lee t deep IN recommended jor the existing !;ye('soils The current water surthce eIe ation of Big Marine Lake is 940 56 taken on 4/10/2007 by the DNR (DNR lakefinder wcbsitc). The OHW for the lake is 942.2 The contractor has indicated that the finished floor dcnation for the house is going to be raised two-feet above the existing finished floor to an cies anon of approximately 949.6. Assuming a driveway elevation 948.5 and a 2' pen ions payer section. the elevation difference between the pervious paver section and the A Division of McCombs Frank Roos & Associates • water table is over 4 tt The site satisfies the ;tIP('A required minimum of 3-feet of separation hetn een the bottom of the base material and the water table. The pervious pavers section shall be installed in three lavers. The bottom laser is a base material composed of a larger chip granite stone or washed aggregate approximately I.5-feet in depth. The next laver is made up of the same type of stone, but a hit smaller in size and 4-inches in depth. The top laver is a bedding of chip granite in depth of l-( '.%Z inches. The pervious pavers will sit on the bedding layer and the remaining voids are to be tilled with additional chip granite. For more information on layer thickness and applicable materials. reference the cross section detail in the included information for Advanced Pavement Technology for the Aqua-Brie Series. .4ssunn», the pervious pavers are designed to handle the 10-rear event. a 1.;'pervious pawn section with a Ott% void rain,provides enough volume to handle the runoff from the proposed impervious area. lhis de.si;In would have a 60-hour retention time. Based on the current a'.ailable soil and groundwater information, it appears that pervious pavers are a feasible option for infiltrating stormwater runoff on this site. Huh recommends that soil borings b a licensed soil engineer be performed to more accurately determine the existing site conditions, so that the pert ious paver section may be revised if necessary If you have am questions or comments. please do not hesitate to contact me at (651)464-3 13(►. Sincerely. Huh and Associates, Inc. • 7 j Marc Dolezal. P E Project Manager EICIIIGEFEr nsta ation ul le to- 'Ay • PRODUCTS, INC • °Wa l kwa s and Patio TOOLS NEEDED: • 25 ft. measure tape (23cm)within 2 feet(1 meter)of new foundation. Excavation • Wooden stakes • 1" diameter sand screed should be 6" (15cm)wider on sides where PAVE EDGE edge • Wide blade masons chisel guides(pipe, wood, etc.) restraint is to be used. • Masons string (twine) • 6-8 ft. 2"x 4" or 2"x 6" • Stiff bristle street broom • Small pry bar BASE PREPARATION • 3-5 pound hammer • 4 ft. Level This is very important. The more time and effort you put into • Hard tooth garden rake • Wheelbarrow the preparation of the base, the better the project and the • Chalk line • Flat shovel longer it will last, Use either 3/4" (19mm)or 1/2" (13mm) graded base material that includes sizes down to fine dust. Rental: (Look in Yellow Pages for local rentals) This material is easier to compact and will give a tight close • 3hp to 5hp plate compactor (not a jumping jack) knit surface of compaction. • Mason diamond saw • Block/Paver splitter Method of Compaction: First, run your plate actor over the excavated soil. (Make sure INSTALLATION no soil gets stuck to the bottom of the plate tamper). Each First measure area you intend to pave. Determine square pass should overlap the previous one by about 4". Now footage by multiplying (length x width = square footage), spread your gravel base material out evenly in about 2" layers. add 5%for breakage and cutting. Measure lineal feet of open If material is dry and dusty us a garden hose to thoroughly edges, those not up against a permanent structure such as a wet it down, this helps make the gravel faster to compact and house, etc. This will indicate lineal footage of PAVE EDGE easier to rake. Starting around the outer perimeter start with required. Draw a plan on a piece of paper showing all the plate compactor and again overlap each pass about 4" important dimensions. Take this plan to your supplier so that working towards the center. You should make at least two he can help you determine the proper amount of materials complete passes for each layer. Use your hard tooth garden needed to complete your project. rake to rake out any unevenness. Using the 3-4-5 triangle method to determine a perpendicular When finished with the base it should be very smooth and flat. line, measure parallel lines from the perpendicular line to If you were to put a straight edge flat on the surface there establish a boundary. Place stakes every 4 feet to 6 feet and should be no more 1/4" (6mm) (maximum)gap anywhere at corners. These stakes should be 8" outside of the planned along the straight edge and the base. edge of the pavers. NOTE: You can check to make sure an area is square by making sure both sets of cross corners Slope and Grade: measure the exact same distance. Slope and Grade are important to ensure proper run-off. It is best to plan a 1/4" (6mm)per foot drop, but try not to exceed EXCAVATION 1/2" (12mm)per foot. NOTE: Before any digging call your local utility companies to locate any underground lines. SAND SETTING BED NOTE: It is important to keep your sand dry and covered in Using a flat shovel cut evenly to remove sod/dirt to a depth case of rain. of at least 5-1/8" (13cm)to allow room for 2-3/8(6cm) paver, 3/4" (19mm)compacted sand, minimum of 2" (5cm)compacted Do not attempt to level any area or surface irregularities with crushed stone base(more if soil is very soft). If the house is of the sand. This will result in an uneven surface and unwanted new construction there might be potential for settling next to settling. the foundation, We suggest you increase base thickness to Lay your screed guides(I" (25mm)electrical conduit,1" strips 6" (15cm)or a total of wood or other suitable rigid 1" guide)4' to 6' apart and • excavation of 9" parallel. Work from side to side with your screed guides, screed a 10' section of sand. You will use your 6 ft.to 8 ft. 2" r _ x 6" to loosely spread the sand and to strike off any excess. - ' DO NOT walk on or work from your screeded sand. Do not ..` worry about voids that screed guides have left after you have • removed them. You will lightly fill them with sand and trowel 1 ' them smooth as you are laying the pavers. LAYING THE PAVERS(Instructions for Small Areas Only) Starting from a permanent edge such as a house, driveway, or • even a piece of PAVE EDGE, lay your first paver starting from either side. (As you start laying pavers, work from right to left, " • then left to right and so on, one row of pavers at a time.)Set w e = . Installation Guide to PAVER ai( L).L}t'IS t Walkways and Patios D the pavers lightly onto the sand, never press B. (AFTER PAVERS HAVE BEEN LAID) them or hammer them in. Be sure to allow Once you have completed the laying of pavers on the sand 6" (15cm)to PAVE EDGE on the open you may finish placing the PAVE EDGE restraints. First, using a sides later. If you are starting with PAVE trowel, cut straight down the side of the pavers into the sand EDGE as a starting point (read #7 now), down to the base and pull back the sand. Be careful not to every 4 feet or so run a string line scrape up the base material. ' ! across front of the laying edge. e If there are some Pavers lagging Then placing the edging flat onto the base push PAVE EDGE behind go about three rows of frost heave lip under the sand, using a hammer to tap against pavers and using a small pry bar, the back of the PAVE EDGE until the edging is tight to the wedge between the Pavers and pavers. Now, spike the edging approximately every two feet. pry the Pavers forward until Pound the spikes in until the head of the spike is touching they are in line again. Do not the edging. worry too much about gaps at this point, they will C. USE PAVE EDGE RIGID FOR STRAIGHT AREAS even out during tamping • later. Many different D. USE PAVE EDGE FLEXIBLE FOR RIGID AREAS ,- laying patterns are possi- NOTE: Not available at all locations. x'nu ble,but herringbone provides = the best surface interlock. THE FINAL STEP Assuming that you have now laid all your pavers. Placed and Set the pavers hand tight, but DO NOT use spiked all your PAVE EDGE, you are ready for the last step. a hammer to adjust the pavers or set them. If you are doing the project over a couple of days, cover the entire area with NOTE: During this step the pavers will settle in about 1/4" plastic overnight if rain is expected. Do not lay pavers over lower during compaction(only if 1" loose screeded sand has the 6" (15cm)extended base area where PAVE EDGE is to been used).This should be their final height. be set later. A. Sweep off any debris or loose sand on the pavers. CUTTING THE PAVERS You will need to cut pavers if you have to go around a post B. Using a vibratory plate compactor, 3 HP to 5 HP,you should or come up against an existing structure or where a radius make at least two passes over the pavers. Starting around the is desired. perimeter and working inward, overlap each pass 2 to 4 inches, Make the second pass at a 45 degree angle to your first. The You do not need to cut(except maybe 1/2" stones)on sides first pass of the compactor will accomplish the following: where PAVE EDGE is installed. Mark any stones to be cut with a crayon or chalk and allow for up to 1/4" (6mm)gap between • will level all the pavers the stone and the edge. This will be filled with sand later. • compact the sand bedding course You should use either a diamond blade meson sew, a paver • force sand up into the joint splitter or a hammer and chisel. C. Repeat Step B if pavers are not yet level and flat PAVE EDGE INSTALLATION A. BEFORE SAND SCREEDING D. Using a DRY medium or coarse washed sand for the joints, Snap chalkline on base material before you screed sand if you spread a thin layer of the jointing sand over the surface. Use a are going to start laying your pavers from a PAVE EDGE line stiff bristle street broom and sweep back and forth over the first. Spike edging so that the chalk line remains visible. Spike entire pavement until sand has stopped felling into joints. every two feet with 10" (25cm)x 3/8" (9mm)diameter steel landscape spike. (Available at any building supply store.) E. Now, alternating between tamping and sweeping,continue to work the material into the joint If when you make a pass PAVE EDGE not only holds the Pavers, but the sand as well. with the plate compactor and no more joints open up,you are then finished. �4 E 7 � , = F. Sweep off all excess sand and backfill edges with top soil and sod or seed. (Be sure to water freshly screeded or sodded ,+ 4�' areas regularly). 4001r441t, •x Congratulations! YOU have now installed a maintenance free t g" '; ` pavement for your patio or walkway. Yours to enjoy for a long time to come. Copyright,1991 PAVE TECH, Inc.All Rights Reserved. (yPVANCE PAVEMENT CKFFIOPY Pedestrian Friendly, Environmentally Advanced The Aqua-BricTM Series Advanced Pavement Technology presents a pedestrian-friendly stormwater management system featuring Aqua-BricTM permeable pavers. The smooth,flat surface created using Aqua-BricTM' meets ADA standards and is a superior choice for areas with high foot traffic - even for pedestrians in high heels or wheel chairs. Ideal for plazas, walkways, entrances and parking lots*,Aqua-BricTM'is used by Advanced Pavement Technology to implement the environmentally sound Bio-Aquifer Storm System (BASSTM). See back side for more information. Benefits of BASSI"' with Aqua-BricTM • Meets pedestrian slip resistance standards from the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA)Architectural Guidelines, as well as EPA stormwater requirements • Provides smooth surfaces with minimal openings to make walking more comfortable • Allows for rapid removal of stormwater through void openings • Eliminates standing water for plazas and walkways without sloping • Maximizes design flexibility by enabling a wide range of creative patterns • Simplifies maintenance in climates with ice and snow 1 i ! :dCTM J r, i -i s Nom.5"x 10"x 2'/s 1 " �,� ti �. { Aqua-BricT"" , Type 2 Dimensions: Nom.5"x 10"x 23/8" Patent pending.Additional sizes available. *May be used in light vehicular designs with 4"x 8"x 3 i/a"pavers; see Advanced Pavement Technology for site-specific details. When used as part of Advanced Pavement Technology's exclusive BASSI"' method, these pavers allow for natural stormwater drainage and groundwater recharge, making the paved surface ecologically sound and economically smart. In fact,the BASSI" method is an acceptable post-structural Best Management Practice (BMP) used to meet the federal stormwater management requirements. Roads and parking lots created using BASSI"'with these permeable pavers offer vast benefits: • Meeting EPA stormwater requirements with a • Delivering maximum strength to handle heavy superior solution for NPDES Phase II vehicular traffic(Aqua-LocI"and Eco-BrickI") • Achieving significant savings and fostering eco- • Producing remarkable curb appeal and conve- logical integrity through enhanced land planning nient maintenance access • Outperforming other systems in harsh climates • Providing outstanding results on a 50-year life- or with freeze/thaw cycles cycle cost analysis Aqua-BricTM,Aqua-LocTm and Eco-BrickTM are licensed shapes, available only from Advanced Pavement Technology or selected national manufacturers.The pavers are manufactured according to ASTM C936 specifications.They can be produced in a variety of custom colors and installed using manual or mechanical methods.The new paver shapes can also be combined during installation to achieve a number of attractive patterns in an ecological pavement system. Bio-Aquifer Storm SystemTM Eco-SwaleTM' -o""Sr. nitifiP 1/8"Joints • , Aqua-BricTM Hand Tight 0.4,. Concrete \ _ Curb a 2"Bedding e� � 'Topsoil fflG°-k- 12" 4"Base =;A •� ����Sub Base . ► i�► f ► � 46. � ` Min. 'CrAL, 4 �ds it'a I ��> 0os ink Stair Sub-Grade Perforated Pipe Ecologically sound. Economically smart. And exclusively from APT. For more information about the BASSI" program, please contact APT toll-free at(877) 551-4200 or visit our website at www.advancedpavement.com. Ecological Paver Systems Division CIA ��� " "— 67 Stonehill Road Oswego,Illinois 60543 IENU l� T F C g (! [ p t, Toll-free(877)551-4200 I (630)551-4200 I Fax(630)551-4225 crt@advancedpavement.com I pat@advancedpavement.com 4814110 www.advancedpavement.corn ©2007 Advanced Pavement Technology.All rights reserved.BASSI"',ECO-SWALETM,Aqua-BrieM,Aqua-LocrM,and Eco-BrickTM are trademarks of Advanced Pavement Technology. Carnelian-Marine-St Croix Watershed District Scandia Plaza II,21150 Ozark Ave.P.O.Box 188,Scandia,MN 55073 August 2, 2007 Anne Hurlburt, Administrator City of New Scandia 15727 209th Street No. P.O. Box 128 Scandia, Minnesota, 55073 Re: CMSCWD Comments on Lepinski Variance Request Big Marine Lake Subwatershed Management Area CMSCWD Comment No. 07-012 Dear Ms. Hurlburt: It is our understanding that the proposed variances are for lot size, lake setback, road setback and lot coverage. The following Carnelian-Marine-St. Croix Watershed District (CMSCW11) comments pertain to the referenced variance request. The CMSCWD's primary concerns are the potential adverse impacts to the lake due to the insufficient lake setback, small lot size, and increase in lot coverage so close to the lake. Please provide copies of CMSCWD comments to the City Planning Commission for consideration at their August 7, 2007, meeting. 1. Proposed project requires a permit from the CMSCWD as it is located in the Shoreland Zone of Big Marine Lake, and requires a variance to the shoreland ordinance. Please make a CMSCWD Permit a requirement of any variance you may grant for this property. 2. Big Marine Lake is the number one priority lake in the CMSCWD, with a water quality rating of"A", and an overall management of"protection". 3. In our opinion the existing house is the right size structure for this small lot. The existing lot at 11.3% impervious is only slightly above the maximum recommended impervious of 10% above which the receiving water body starts to become adversely impacted by stormwater runoff. 4. Certificate of Survey/Plan Sheet. a. The 100-yr flood elevation needs to be identified on the plan sheet and the lowest floor elevation needs to be at least 2-ft above the 100-yr flood elevation. The lowest floor elevation (including basements) should be at least about 945.0-ft and should be identified on the proposed plan sheet. b. Lot coverage computation based on lot area above the OHW of the lake should include the existing driveway to be relocated and the proposed new driveway. Status of existing driveway and ownership of the 182nd North Right of Way needs to be resolved. Typically in this situation a shared roadway would be centered on the common property line. If the existing driveway is actually going to be relocated (after resolving legal issues) a plan is needed to restore the old driveway area to a vegetated permeable surface. Managers John Bower Richard Caldecott Victoria Dupre Steve Kronmiller James Shaver Frederick Markwardt Douglas Pratt CMSCWD - (Lepinski Variance Request) 08/02/2007 Page 2 c. Driveway could probably be reduced in size. d. Proposed lot coverage should also include proposed walkways (i.e. from driveway to front step and to lake), patio's etc. 5. A grading and drainage plan is needed for this project: a. The July 20, 2007, letter from Hult &Associates indicates that the proposed low floor elevation will be raised to 949.6 ft. This will help avoid future flooding problems. However, this proposed elevation is 5-ft above the existing grade of 944.5 indicated on the certificate of Survey and will probably require fill to accomplish. The grading plan is needed to evaluate the impacts of the proposed fill. b. There appears to be an existing drainage swale along the north portion of the lot. The proposed fill must not direct additional drainage to the neighbors' lot. c. The north wall of the proposed building is located right next to the existing well. This maybe an issue for future maintenance of the well. 6. Project will need an erosion and sediment control plan and final site restoration plan. 7. Stormwater quality treatment to reduce phosphorous loads from the property should be included in the site design. This can be accomplished by establishing a native vegetative buffer for the lake and other stormwater treatment practices. The most likely location for the treatment facilities would be to incorporate the north drainage swale into a raingarden infiltration practice that overflows through a re-established native shoreland buffer. Following construction, the soils around the new buildings, which get compacted during construction, will need to be deep tilled prior to restoring the permanent vegetation. This will help maintain the infiltration capacity of the soils. 8. Proposed Pervious Pavement Driveway. a. The soils identified by Developer's Engineer are not very conducive to infiltration. A subsurface draintile should be provided. Draintile should be set about 1-ft above bottom of rock so some infiltration will occur. The rest will receive some filtration treatment but tile should be discharge to vegetated buffer and not directly to lake. b. In the past Washington County did not typically accept impervious pavement to meet the lot coverage requirement. I believe this was because their concern was also for the aesthetics (lots not being over crowded)as well as environmental concerns. The City may want to consider allowing a partial credit for the pervious pavers towards the lot coverage requirement. Especially if applicant is providing additional water quality treatment measures to protect the lake. c. Another option would be to require that grass pavers instead of block pavers be used for a portion of the parking area. That way applicant could have a stable surface to park on, but the area would still be vegetated. 9. If the City should decide to grant the requested variance with conditions to protect water quality, the City should consider an additional requirement for the landowner to record a CMSCWD - (Lepinski Variance Request) 08/02/2007 Page 3 declaration against the title of the property to ensure future property owners are required to maintain water quality protection measures. 10. As shown on the attached picture from the CMSCWD's 2004 Environmental Assessment Overflight the existing lot appears to have several trees which will probably be lost due to the proposed increase in building size. The shoreland ordinance prevents removal of trees greater than 6-inches in diameter in the building setback from lake. At a minimum the location of trees and those proposed for removal should be identified and a tree replacement plan required. Please feel free to contact me at (651) 770-8448 if you have any questions on this comment letter. Sincerely, Daniel A. Fabian, P.E. CMSCWD Engineer cc: Allen and Penny Lepinski, Owner/Applicant John Bower, CMSCWD Board Member Steve Kronmiller, CMSCWD Board Member Richard Thompson/Berry Farrington, TKDA (Scandia Planner) CMSCWD - (Lepinski Variance Request) 08/02/2007 Page 4 - .xi �`" - r ..� " ,� - , ,$0, pie • 1 f 'c- ' .AS EF t sat— r': - ,,� iF 'ir,,i.. a •.€. mv. � .'. 5i 91.71i_:,,,t „TT,,..: • , ....,. , i 7,,,.+-1?'..i,.: ..„...;:_.,,-%:::,•1„,,J2,„,.30,-4.:,-,„.A-_,-4_4,:..„ 4 e • +R «YE i ..uSSr • , t..iffr .,,,,.„.... ... ..c.4.1re.00litiA ,.:,i,. -.- ' -,,,,,,,,,i ie. kit, foxat,it, 4; v..,-.,:,'.,'' -IA;„i.r4 ,Ve4„,.: : 'AR--4CA,,,,,:, ..4E. .4 r s. Lepinski Propserty : '•. 6 4 i;.� �,�u Location Map 8rr,Mari Like •, C07-012 12614 182nd St Comments 2007 5u�lbn Or»s F Upciraam end of ranacture + tau.wrSIMAR5*nd Cer Uneck,ro • I it tv vteucet P 10( .1 vontou+a Feet b 10} ".�J 1 foot C�ItGV'3 RoameM C'1ASCWU A hishivenn Cr*,MneDOT NCI Cnurrl.... Ai aar 1 2007 C►IADIFIRMIT PreO AAAA(.iVrradarnmn entst_0T mac Meeting Date: 8/7/2007 Agenda Item: ( A a (, J, Jecv, Planning Commission/City Council Agenda Report City of Scandia 14727 209th St. North Scandia, MN 55073 (651) 433-2274 Action Requested: Hold a public hearing on the application of Pat Reicherts, Big Marine Lake Investment LLC, for a variance to allow installation of a second freestanding business sign at the Big Marine Lake Store, 19261 Manning Trail North Deadline/ Timeline: 60-day review expires September 16, 2007 Background: The planner will present the attached report and recommendations at the hearing. Recommendation: The planner has recommended denial of the variance. The findings in the report have been incorporated into a draft resolution for use by the Commission and City Council. Should the Commission and Council determine that the variance should be approved, staff recommends that findings and conditions be drafted in a resolution to be adopted at a subsequent City Council meeting. Attachments/ • Draft resolution for denial (No. 08-07-07-03) Materials provided: • TKDA Memorandum dated July 25, 2007 • Application • Site Plan • Plan of Existing Sign • Proposed Sign Graphics Contact(s): Pat Reicherts, Big Marine Lake Investment LLC (651) 433-2640 Prepared by: Anne Huriburt, Administrator (2007018 variance big marine lake store) Page 1 of 1 08/01/07 CITY OF SCANDIA, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 08-07-07-03 DENYING VARIANCE REQUEST FOR 19261 MANNING TRAIL NORTH WHEREAS, Pat Reicherts, Big Marine Lake Investment LLC, has made application for a variance for a second monument business sign, located at 19261 Manning Trail North; and WHEREAS, the property is legally described as follows; All that part of the SW '/ of SE ' of Sect 30, Twp 32 N, Range 20 W described as follows: Commencing at the NW corner of said 40-acre tract, running thence South 12 rods and 5 feet to a point, thence East at right angles 26 rods to a point,thence North at right angles and parallel with the West line of said tract to the North line of said tract 12 rods and 5 feet, thence West on the North line of said tract to the place of beginning, containing 2 acres, more of less; Also all that part of the NW ' of SE '/ of Sect 30, Twp 32 N, Range 20 W, described as follows, to-wit: Commencing at the SW corner of the said NW '/ of SE ' , thence East on the South line thereof 26 rods to a point , thence North at right angles 12 feet to a point, thence West at right angles 26 rods to a point on the West line thereof 12 feet North of the SW corner, thence South 12 feet to the point of beginning and together with a permanent prescriptive easement of a "gravel driveway" situated in the County of Washington, State of MN, and legally described as follows, to- wit: That part of the NW '1e of SE '% of Sect 30, Twp 32 N, Range 20 W, described as follows: Commencing at the SW corner of said NW ' of SE ' ; thence North, assumed bearing along the West line of said NW '% of SE '/ a distance of 12 feet to the point of beginning; thence North 88 deg 21 min 19 sec East parallel with the South line of said NW '% of SE '/ a distance of 185 feet; thence North 73 deg 10 min 40 sec West 61.11 feet; thence North 87 deg 06 min 36 sec West 119 feet to the West line; thence South along said West line 26 feet to the point of beginning, subject to a road easement for C.S.A. No. 15 along the West line thereof. Containing 3,395 square feet, more of less.; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request at a duly noticed Public Hearing on August 7, 2007, and has recommended denial for the variance for a second monument business sign; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCANDIA, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does deny the request of Pat Reicherts, Big Marine Lake Investment LLC for the variance for a second monument business sign, based on the following findings: 1. The subject property may be used in a reasonable manner for business purposes without a second monument sign. Resolution No.: 08-07-07-03 Page 2 of 2 2. There are no unique circumstances of the property that cause need for a second monument sign. 3. The regulations of the Ordinance allow other ways of placing signage for the second business, without a variance. Adopted by the Scandia City Council this 7th day of August, 2007. Dennis D. Seefeldt, Mayor ATTEST: Administrator/City Clerk TKDA 444 Cedar Street,Suite 1500 Saint Paul,MN 55101-2140 ENGINEERS•ARCHITECTS•PLANNERS (651)292-4400 (651)292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com MEMORANDUM To: City Council Reference: Big Marine Store Variance Request Planning Commission City of Scandia, Minnesota Anne Hurlburt, Administrator Scandia File Number 2007018 Copies To: Pat Reicherts Proj. No.: 13812.008 From: Richard E. Thompson, AICP Routing: Berry Farrington,AICP Date: July 25, 2007 SUBJECT: Big Marine Store Variance Request MEETING DATE: August 7, 2007 LOCATION: 19261 Manning Trail North Scandia, Minnesota APPLICANT: Pat Reicherts, Big Marine Lake Investment LLC ZONING: Retail Business (RB) 60-DAY PERIOD ENDS: September 16, 2007 ITEMS REVIEWED: Application Certificate of Survey Signage Detail BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST: The Applicant requests a variance to construct a second monument business sign at 19261 Manning Trail North, the Big Marine Lake Store. There is currently one monument sign on the property. The Scandia Zoning Ordinance, Section 9.13, allows one freestanding monument business sign per lot in the Retail Business District. EVALUATION OF THE REQUEST: Sign Regulations One freestanding monument business sign per lot and one business sign attached to the building are allowed in the Retail Business District. Section 9.13(8)(A), Shopping Center Signs, states, "Shopping Centers or buildings containing more than one (I) tenant are allowed one (1) monument sign which may contain the An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Big Marine Store Variance Request Page 2 July 25, 2007 City of Scandia names of all businesses in the project. Individual businesses may be identified by way of signs attached to the building. The total square footage of sign area may not exceed the limits set forth in 6C above." Section 6C allows one square foot of sign area for each lineal foot of building front. The subject property has one existing freestanding monument business sign. The face of the existing sign is 75.84 square feet. The sign is 15 feet tall and 5 feet 8 inches wide. The Applicant requests a variance to allow a second freestanding monument sign to identify a second business on the property. The second monument sign is proposed to be 6 feet tall and 2.5 feet wide. The face of the sign is proposed to be 2.5 feet by 2.5 feet, or 6.25 square feet. The sign materials would be a wood face, engraved and painted, supported by two wood 4-by-4 posts. Evaluation of Hardship Variance requests are evaluated based on whether strict enforcement of the Ordinance would create hardship. In situations where the request is to exceed a maximum standard set by the Ordinance that is unrelated to the unique nature of the property, there is typically no evidence of hardship. The request for an additional monument sign does not related to reasonable use of the property or circumstances unique to the property. The Applicant has not presented a case of hardship, and the Planners do not find a hardship to be present. The Scandia Zoning Ordinance, Section 9.13(8)(A) is unequivocal in its treatment of monument signage for buildings with more than one business. One monument sign is allowed which may contain the names of all businesses on the property. The subject property may be used in a reasonable manner for business purposes without an additional monument sign. There are no unique circumstances of the property that cause need for a second monument sign. The Planners identify the following options available to the Applicant to place signage for the second business, without constructing a second monument sign on the property. These options do not require a variance. 1) Reconfigure the existing monument sign to accommodate the new signage. 2) Post signage on the exterior of the building, meeting the standards of the Ordinance for Shopping Center Signs. Compliance of Existing Signage On a site visit conducted July 24, 2007, the Planner found that there is existing signage on the property that does not comply with the Zoning Ordinance. There are approximately seven temporary signs posted on the property, and two other permanent signs that do not comply with the sign regulations. The temporary and permanent signs that do not comply with the Ordinance must be removed. The Planner also observed exterior storage of sales items (stoves/furnaces). The store's CUP does not address exterior storage and so the exterior storage of sales items is not permitted. Exterior storage must be removed. Big Marine Store Variance Request Page 3 July 25, 2007 City of Scandia ACTION REQUESTED: The Planning Commission can recommend: I. Approval 2. Approval with conditions 3. Denial with findings 4. Table the request PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: The Planners recommend denial of the variance request to allow a second monument sign, based on the following findings: I. The subject property may be used in a reasonable manner for business purposes without a second monument sign. 2. There are no unique circumstances of the property that cause need for a second monument sign. 3. The regulations of the Ordinance allow other ways of placing signage for the second business, without a variance. File No. o 0 7 2/q APPLICATION FOR PLANNING AND ZONING REQUEST City of Scandia, Minnesota 14727 209th Street North, PO Box 128, Scandia, MN 55073 651/433-2274 Facsimile Machine 651/433-5112 Please read before completing: The City will not begin processing an application that is incomplete. Detailed submission requirements may be found in the Scandia Development Code,available at the City office and website(www.ci.scandia.mn.us)and in the checklist forms for the particular type of application. Application fees are due at the time of application and are not refundable. 1. Property Location: (street address, if applicable) t )-C t ►'ylA rl *1 l 14 G- I R ► L 1 . r ►A t o 4 S T. C R o 0\ 2. Washington County Parcel ID: 36o 322 oL4 30o a 1 3. Complete� Legal Description: (attach if necessary) rlr �Ati 4. Owner(s): Phone: et C.mc4_, l Ruts i rh`ram!' (h) LLC, (b) Street Address: `3),L t to A-?`lM k N(,. 1 RL H. E-Mail: City/ State: W�pR,t 1�� G N. ST. C.A 6 lrhla Zip: S S 6q7 5. Applicant/Contact Person: Phone: ?7N-A- kt- -i S (h) (433-2(q (b) (S1 102 -66C3 Street Address (Mailing): E-Mail: \\ 133 ICrit`` ST. 1'"( , City/ State: a, 144.4-ie//�/ t S T. (' /x Zip: �h! sSa 4/7 6. Requested Action(s): (check all that apply) 1/ Variance Minor Subdivision Conditional Use Permit Planned Unit Development Interim Use Permit Preliminary Plat/Major Subdivision Certificate of Compliance(Residential) Preliminary Plat/Open Space Conservation Subdivision Certificate of Compliance(Commercial) Final Plat Map Amendment(Zoning or Comprehensive Plan) Permit Extension Text Amendment(Zoning or Comprehensive Plan) Other 7. Brief Description of Request: (attach separate sheet if necessary) —Cv ._ EcV ik 5 !Gri! v/L /E 6frs(/kit SS U ,S 14-#0'e--S- gpr4 c'6 v &t 7 6 Ph ' j T 6-,✓ 2 72e k z 14 e t-t/o N-f C/iWe- %a/o" ` ' %t- ( C . 1C, IA CAk t41`C0 8. Project Name: I hereby apply for consideration of the above described request and declare that the information and materials submitted with this application are complete and accurate. I understand that applicants are required to reimburse the city for all out-of-pocket costs incurred for processing, reviewing and hearing the application. These costs shall include,but are not limited to: publication and mailing of notices; review by the city's engineering,planning and other consultants; legal costs,and recording fees. An escrow deposit to cover these costs will be collected by the city at the time of application. Any balance remaining after review is complete will be refunded to the applicant. No interest is paid on escrow deposits. PLEASE NOTE: If the fee owner is not the applicant, the applicant must provide written authorization by the fee owner in order for this application to be considered complete. Property Fee Owner S' natu e(s) Date: _0#61- 411‹ 7 47 Applicant Signature(s) Date: 7- ,e...€1..4. 7//7/d2 For City Use Only Application Fees: 5 `-' �—( -7//fd 7/a? Parcel Search Fee: 3 PAID . Escrow Deposit: oC 3 6 JUL 1 8 ?DI i 3-- 3 CITY :__ ;CANDIA • MEAN NOTED A. THE LOC..*Or wNL UTILITIES DRIVEWAY SHALL BE MAW)BY TRIE CMTRACTCR --__,- BY CALLNC OOPNp STATE ONE CALL % I,-SW-EM-NBm. ----- ------ ------!_. EASEMENT HULT r ASSOCIATES,INC. B. SAFETY NONCE TO Cp O ACCEPTED N - PIONEERS PLANNERS StAPM[MRS ACCORDANCE YAM MEMO ACttPTEU CONS...RON...TIES THE CONTRACTOR �BE SOELT AND LD1RS CA, r ERRAND oELw�srovs ON9BL[!d1 CONPTIF A ON THE JOB N \ FOREST LA.RN 1M.RRAND .WMU WETS OF ALL PERSONS 55THBH.51]0 THE NNO K.PROPERTY THIS PEOUPEMENTT SELL APPLY U 1 CMNL:.ULTWFRA.COM LOWED TO Z . MEIPNAL woMilr+o NCO. in ;WELL C. 1HE CMTRACTCP SHALL ASSUME �I CdNLETE RESPOMS CITY FOR CON/ROLL. -'I W ____�:, ALL SILTATION AND CROSON OF THE PROJECT AREA ALL LP09RN CONTROL AND 1�JOe 17111IIIII�IIiIlI1lIIIIII ATAnC.CONTROL MEASURES DEALS I EXISTING MEE COMPLY WTH M".cSOTAS EST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES MANUAL. 1HE ', I < EXISTING BUILDING OCNTRANECESSARY SHALL USEI.TYNATEEEROS.R MEANS o K- G BUILDING Pat Reicherts Ett55ANI CL DCAU EA SNOT LIMED TO. 7lV 3w }}____ STAKED STRAW BALES ROCK SHALL K -- COMmIN SILT N°PA EOAND C SHALL `�-2<— • --27-_ PROPOSED' TOLAOK NON OR.DINc AND caN+mLIE x i WOEWT THE PROJECT UNTIL z�r ADDITION PROPOSED POLE SHED ACC:MANE a THE PAK ev THE MCP. u*O I THE P ETRACICN'S RESPENSELITT NOLUDE9 ALL OE90N AND IMPLCMNTAT114 L.€.-• I -1. Mill Project 5 REOUMED TO PRESENT EROSOLN AMU THE try 22- DEPO9TING Or 911. HE OW[R MAY.AT <R=R iP RCA OPTIC..PRECT TEE CONTRACTOR z u 5 STALLS , �. 5 STALLS PROPOSED HrsAEA METHODS AS DEEMED Ti!TO ><»< I ` Big Marine Lake Store 'MOIE�t PEOPEPIY ANp wpROwY[NTL o c u $ ' / E..N F• PROPANE 9 PD9nx O 9L*M w0 a HEW �.+ ; 9 ,� LANK Hew Scuttle Township,NN OR Ex51NG PALEMCTO OR N FASTING =W I j �,. yp,r-- P. STORM SEEPS CM SRAM SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAM AND EFFECTED AREAS CLEANED TO THE CT*.,0 O v Z H ; N RLN7 T HE TRDWEEPOPALL Al THE EXPENSE 6 THE N $ • I D. PMM To PLACEMENT a THE I. m o n. R� WOODED Sheet Title AGGREGATE BASE.A TEST MIL WLL BE AREA 9O OH . STREET AND PARKRC I ... SLOPE AREA 9ADOMIE. THE CENTRACTOR SHALL y PROVIDED A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK O `£ r-DPOSS SHALL EE25 TONS THE Site Plan TEST POLLNO SHALL BE AT THE OMECnON I Tt eAR .. OF THE SEAS ENGINEER AND SHALL EC w -•24.-E1 SINSD N AREAS AS PREMIX PT THE L„ ■ 5 I -- DO ENGINEER. THE SOILS DIONEER Z I CD I 0?oR s' SHALL DOERR.MACH SECTNn9 O THE z CTRM OR PARK.AREA APE UNSTABLE. F ORRECTION Or THE SUBCP•OE sass SHALL M1 L PERC 2 BE COIRUTED IN ACCCROANE WIN THE w %41\ - PEOUPEMENTS OF THE SONS CHANGER H' W ../ N *er I a.m be UM Pm Tq by W I o I PT, inooll E o at E. MC CONTRACTOR SHALL SUE.Cu, U ERC 1 edN Pm�R el IM 9MIR el Mm wh AREAS. WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED, I 0 A DEPTH OF 4 INCHES. RESPPEAO CPS.N AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BC MD TOPS. TO A MilNUM DEPTH OF 4 \TEL. PED. TO X —— NRNr iyry KNOWN WIN THE er CRAP. BE RELOCATED _ I SEPTIC D.C. lkM I RUFT CONSTRUCTION A L SEED AND THE S AREACONTRACTOR SMALL SEED AND PULP.THOSE PIECED FP TIE OTHER. HE I ; 1 ANK SEED.SHALL HAPLY RP MN/DOT BOAT AND TRAILER PARKING M 007 ION NO.SSE NTH THE USED MIXTURENO SOA AND APPLIED.T i I I 4FIIQHD IRR A RATE Or TOO POUNDS PER ACRE. SEED MO SSA 5 ♦E APPLED TO M PAN C.;ALA OEM POND BOTTOMS. HE SEEDED f cr::, BOR 1 ae.O tRt PEA 91ALL,' NTH DRA. NE MULM I �FF =� %� ® BOR 2 Data 12/2(OS SHALL coin,'w U IED,T E M.04ndE *A 3E2.TYPE I. THE LUCK 9.1 BE AMID NO ANCHORED M ACCORDANCE OT SPEa(MAAON NO.2575.5.El. M CH SHALT RE APE.AT THE RATE OF PROPOSED PINE IkslSions NIP PEP wTA'orsc.E cuELLGDe sSNA ro TREE SCREENING % yP DE By * OTHER APPROVED EOIAPMENT. (B TREES).,-'---- A wood rMER BLANKET sHNL BE Mt PEP EaWYN SODAS OE* ED AC.PLACID I AREAS EN THE THE SLOPE[MM.II(POND SLOPES). LANDSCAPING DEESMOS PROPOSED BY THE 090.7 Aro CARLELMN MARINE WATERSNOR DISTRICT MIRE SHALL SE INCORPa1ATEo E RANEE IT THE CONTRACTOR SNAIL COMPLY EMI MC PE UI ORITY CE NT S°`MI"`""NG TABLE OF CONTENTS O EACH POR CO Mt LEGEND CONTRACTOR SHALL POST MAE BY SECURITY.MC CKPLY NM ALL PEEPED EACH SHEET 1: SITE PLAN caERYNO wTHOM+T O ua ROAowAv. FLOOR CLEW... THE PROPOSED SHEET 2: GRADING PLAN TREE TO BE REMOVED DOTTOR SHALL K BE VERSED PROP To FMN GRRAD.ACTRATE9 MADE ADAISTMENTS NORTH REv TTONN Y BE D FERS i Dui AN ELEVAlTOR.OOR =� TREE TO REMAIN I 'CL' POWER POLE 0 TO 20 AO 80 SITE COVERAGE CALCULATIONS: ® TELEPHONE PEDESTAL Sheet+ EC. PROPOSED LIGHT I/ TOTAL LOT AREA: 94,700t S.F. TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 46,400± S.F. PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA IS 49% OF THE TOTAL LOT AREA MUST FILE NO.: 03221(mMZt) I. Big Marine Lake Store a 4. v , 1 BIG MARINE LAKE 7~ORE' 1 Big Marine/Liquor — 5' 8" wide X 5' 1-15/16" high 28,95 square feet 1 LIQUOR k„.. _ ;:, 15' II REGULAR "i , 699 One-Product Price 5' 8" wide X 5' 1-15/16 high . 10 28,95 square feet i=. 9 1 k:< Diesel DIESEL 5' 8" wide X 1' 6-13/16" high 8.97 square feet BAIT Bait 5' 8" wide X 1' 6-13/16" high 8.97 square feet (ROIX OR 75.84 Total Square Feet CO (OfTIPOflY U � N .v 0 0 0 . GO /°C RECEIVED d) AUG - 6 Z007 10860 191 Street North CITY OF SCANDIA Marine On St. Croix,MN 55047 651-433-3050 August 3, 2007 Ms Brenda Eklund City of Scandia Deputy Clerk 14727 209`h Street N. Scandia, MN 55073 Subject: Approval of variance to allow installation of a second business sign Dear Ms Brenda Eklund: This letter is in response to your letter of July 23, 2007 informing property owners about the Public Hearing on Tuesday August 7, 2007. Considering the request by Pat Reicherts for a variance approval for a second freestanding business sign at Big Marine Lake Store. We are against giving the owners of Big Marine Lake Store a variance for a second sign. First of all why does a small business have to have two signs. Most business have one sign to advertise and the sign that is there now is adequate. We do not want another and/or bigger business sign. Second, with too many signs this may distract drivers. There has been car accidents in front of this store. Third, in this area, too many signs will distract from the beauty of our country/rural atmosphere. We are asking the City Council and Mayor of Scandia to vote "NO" on this matter. Regards, g41471-- -B91 A1)--re-S- obert M. Sterbentz Betty Ann France-Sterbentz Cc: Mayor Dennis Seefeldt Meeting Date: 8/7/2007 Agenda Item: 4) ,1C ) (-)-(-1- Planning Commission Agenda Report City of Scandia 14727 209th St. North Scandia, MN 55073 (651) 433-2274 Action Requested: Continue the discussion of the definition of"Building Height" as found in Chapter 1 of the Development Code (continued from the July 10, 2007 meeting.) Deadline/ Timeline: N/A Background: • The definition of"building height" was recently discussed during consideration of the Tii Gavo Final Plat. The current definition is difficult to interpret and is different than the definition in the State Building Code. • The definitions of building height vary among codes. A brief search yielded a variety of definitions (see attached.) • Of the examples given, Wyoming's and Plymouth's are the simplest and closest to the definition found in the State Building Code. • At the July meeting, it was noted that the newly-released version of the Building Code might include a change in the definitions of "grade plane" and/or"building height." Discussion was tabled to investigate whether or not there was a pending code change. Staff has reviewed the code language and found that there are NO changes to the Building Code definitions included in the previous report. Recommendation: The Commission should discuss the definition, and whether or not an amendment to the Scandia Development Code should be considered. Attachments/ • Sample Building Height Definitions Materials provided: Contact(s): Prepared by: Anne Hurlburt, Administrator (building heights continued) Page 1 of 1 07/24/07 Sample Building Height Definitions Scandia Development Code: Building Height: The vertical distance between the highest adjoining ground level within five (5) feet of the building, or ten(10) feet above the lowest ground level within five (5) feet of the building, whichever is lower and the highest point of a flat or mansard roof or the average height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. No structure shall exceed the maximum height permitted for the zoning district in which it is located, except for church spires, chimneys, agricultural silos, wind energy conversion systems, wireless communication antennas and towers and flag poles up to 45 feet in height. (A) The elevation of the highest adjoining sidewalk or ground surface within a 5-foot horizontal distance of the exterior wall of the building when such sidewalk or ground surface is not more than 10 feet above lowest grade. (B) An elevation 10 feet higher than the lowest grade when the sidewalk or ground surface described in Item A above is more than 10 feet above the lowest grade. The height of a stepped or terraced building is the maximum height of any segment of the building. Washington County Development Code: Building Height: The vertical distance above a reference datum measured to the highest point of the coping of a flat roof or to the deck line of a mansard roof or to the average height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. The reference datum shall be selected by either of the following, whichever yields a greater height of the building: (A) The elevation of the highest adjoining sidewalk or ground surface within a 5 foot horizontal distance of the exterior wall of the building when such sidewalk or ground surface is not more than 10 feet above lowest grade. (B) An elevation 10 feet higher than the lowest grade when the sidewalk or ground surface described in Item A above is more than 10 feet above the lowest grade. The height of a stepped or terraced building is the maximum height of any segment of the building. Wyoming Zoning Ordinance: Building, height of means the vertical distance measured from the average elevation of the finished grade along the building edge to the highest point of the roof surface in a flat roof, to the deck line of mansard roofs, and to the mean height level between eaves and ridge of gable, hip and gambrel roofs. Plymouth Zoning Ordinance: Building Height: The vertical distance from the average of the highest and lowest point of grade for that portion of the lot covered by the building to the highest point of the roof for flat roofs, to the roof deck line of mansard roofs and to the mean height between eaves and ridge for gable, hip, and gambrel roofs. Stillwater Zoning Ordinance: Height, building means the vertical dimension, measured from the average elevation of the finished lot grade at the front of the building to the highest point of ceiling of the top story, in the case of a flat roof, to the deck line of a mansard roof and to the average height between the plate and ridge of a gable, hip or gambrel roof. Cottage Grove Zoning Ordinance: BUILDING HEIGHT: The vertical distance from the average elevation of the adjoining ground level, or the established grade adjacent to the building, whichever is lower, to the top of the cornice of a flat roof, to the deck line of a mansard roof, to a point of the roof directly above the highest wall of a shed roof, the uppermost point on a round or other arch type roof, to the highest gable on a pitched or hip roof. State Building Code Defmitions: HEIGHT, BUILDING. The vertical distance from grade plane to the average height of the highest roof surface. GRADE PLANE. A reference plane representing the average of finished ground level adjoining the building at exterior walls. Where the finished ground level slopes away from the exterior walls, the reference plane shall be established by the lowest points within the area between the building and the lot line or, where the lot line is more than 6 feet (1829 mm) from the building,between the building and a point 6 feet (1829 mm) from the building. Meeting Date: 8/7/2007 Agenda Item: b (' Planning Commission Agenda Report City of Scandia 14727 209th St. North Scandia, MN 55073 (651) 433-2274 Action Requested: Continue discussion on architecture of churches (continued from the July 10, 2007 meeting.) Deadline/ Timeline: N/A Background: • At the May meeting, the Planning Commission and Council discussed the need for new church buildings to reflect the community's character. • Commissioner Nickelson requested that the Commission discuss this issue before Willowbrook Church submits development applications. He provided photographs for discussion at the last meeting. It was suggested that the Commissioners make their own observations and continue the discussion next month. • Since the last meeting, staff has heard from the architect for the church, who indicated that they are working on plans and will contact us soon to schedule an informal discussion. • Some additional photographs are attached for discussion. Recommendation: The Commission may discuss the issue as you deem appropriate. Attachments/ • Letter dated May 7, 2007 to Willowbrook Community Church Materials provided: • Photographs Contact(s): Prepared by: Anne Hurlburt, Administrator (church architecture continued) Page 1 of 1 07/24/07 J ''S ! 3 % Rv. rs' dr rr :_ _. . � ...... � * g - .r.'� - >4tT { r ,� �+� � le r ,:�.. , Ir... �' � Ik .' B .fit`- ' .,+ ' - Jr fi i''f' le..,-A. 1 t, a�' f L• `''�!'�[ �+' -4 ,yam .. < y �, r , ?.r a �t a•: sf l�. : 0114, t k ... i is iikt., lZ x *t 1., , r 4111\ P , . , . ...„ . . ,, , ... ..,.._, ... • . . , .. ... . . . ... .. *. ,_,.. ..... .., .. .„.,.. . ._„... . . . .„..., ..., . . ._. . •• __ , . „. . , .. . ..,....„ _ . . .. ___. _... . . _ _ . ,_ . . . . . . _, ... , .. ._ .. . . .,....... .... • _ . • it,,....... .. .,, ' . .7, i ; :'2.41#.4*4 • •'... ... . .;'.1 , • i . ,. .. .„ I.. . 4 I " - ..,-.....-- - -- v•_,...,,.-.,tr, , _ 4 -. 140-•-1,..v.0,,,-. . . ,.. :-- ,,---- -:-...gro---• 1 -- --. .... -.',.4 .......____.- • - ---------- , ...-.... . , „.. . ,,,......, ..,,. -•. vigrelliggPrkr- _ .— __ - , -,.....„-.;,./0=adec,„, .,_ ______ •-- __,.........._ , . . \., .. , '-. ..,,, --.--.,:'., . ',.. . .. ..„-,-.--:.•z!::',,'-i... .7 ..... - '\ .. - . _.•.._. ,.. .. ., .. .. . . . .„.., . . . „„„iieft%,..„:„-t4,,,t,..f.„, . . , . • ....... ------ --.... . . ) 4.. , • !.....;„,,, ,-.. • .. .-...,..:.-------.-.::,,-,-...,.-..,-....-.--.7_,..„-....-......-_,-,,,,,,,,-7..-.,, ,F,,,,,,,..„ I . II . r- ."-..:. . .........._ ..., .. - .. , .. . ----' -- 't!..--0,....,-..-4--..,,,..,....„,,,,,.-:',....: - -,...- ,„„Li''-'4.„7:,,,''''',. ''',.'''-.' ".- 'I.,:"":•;"-..!-.7 .,),,...''' .,4_,....,-Nfor "ItTr'•"e,i 4:4,,i;7 -' - ,.._-___'„...'-','`"'''''''',_'....,...i f:;4, ,:',.1,..1.1.';;.1,,.' '-' -ii...--:.1!.'''.:,--1.-* ... - ',---:'''''..''''''-:.'' - --'•,....•,.-led. .,,E,.. .. ,-tter,r-A''' -' - ' -....,,,Itit.V.,!..'-....:..;.,..„.; :',".-': . • ' V-r,.....1.. -: ..,--'r.' ••":“:....1":7•:7-,-,;.:-.-.,,f ,. ,,.....,,^4 '-',01'''' 'irtt';'.`'',Vri..77474,..k-"a"...''''.""4-- .'.i ''''''% rle''..' ''-. '- t'-'.;:. ',....4.--7,44•4*.-"' \....•.1>\ •,ii.r.-A.a..4z.....,..%,4,.., -..!;,--4i:-.84-1,:t;:t,,zi-,_.,.,-.;,= ,;i:„.....4-.,,,:.:,.;.„..._, '-,4,- .._, 4t,-,--,- ''*-14" ..,'!•V',1,..:,...,. „itikt,- .., ,,...-. t ,.,,. zli,,... , .. , ..,:_,1. . ''''77- — - -.- ,,• -.11 : . .• • 'X S i '41 . . • • - , . .. -‘I - .:1; - . 1,4,- 4.7,4 :111111111:1, it fir• Mk L. i...- / 4 , 1 \ qk, . • • ••• . , • im ......„„.•-` ,,-..., .s."....„,,, ....'>. . ' ..,,_ , - • tolti,-,--7,I's...-,. ,.. ... 5. to 1, '''''l'frilts01-4*rt<--- 1, .!! ,..., ., 4- • - ''- , .- 14. - ,.-.. - --..- -..,. It„„,.• .... .d.-...-.4_ 4. - ,- - •r ._.1 ........2........ 4 ,.tt ti:rt:„.',:ilt,2*f.44- _.,- ----,-,••••,..- C/I't/lit/ a1,0 ed bel; ClEianFrPrrareit WPM ar-1 SUHVIEIr j...I . ..1 P.O. Box 37 HULT & ASSOCIATES, INC. DALE F. HEBEISEN Forest Lake, MN 55025 Minn, Lic. No. 13590 Surveyors, Engineers & Wetland Specialists I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared Phone: 651.464.3130 by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly TOTAL LOT AREA = Fox: 651.464.4822 Licensed Land Surveyor under the lows of the State of Minnesota. 16,222± (SQ. FT.) INCLUDING 1/2 OF ROAD E-mail: hult@mfra.com DATE:10/2 /26y r LOT AREA ABOVE THE ORDINARY HULT & ASSOCIATES, INC. by ""-- ;„„V ' HIGH WATER LEVEL= 15,338± SQ. FT. DALE F. HEBEISEN, Minnesota Licensed Land Surveyor REVISED: 7/18/2007 SURVEY FOR: ALLEN & PENNY LEPINSKI IMPERVIOUS AREAS (SQ. FT.) .,---, - - —=_- EXISTING HOUSE = 996± — = __.., _ ... EXISTING GARAGE = 374± ..- LOT 12, BIG LAKE VIEW THIRD ADDITION, ••=- ___-= SHED = 83± _. ..- . WASHINGTON COUNTY,MINNESOTA WALK PATH = 242± TOGETHER WITH PART OF VACATED STREET RO(0) 7T=E1 CONCRETE= 45± TOTAL EXISTING IMPERVIOUS = 1740± EXISTING CONDITIONS6, 64 IMPERVIOUS AREA (PERCENT) BENCHMARK: TOTAL EXISTING IMPERVIOUS = 11.3±% ---- 60D SPIKE IN POWER POLE NOTE: ' ELEVATION=945.55 4 - \ BECAUSE OF THE APPARENT LACK OF ORIGINAL MONUMENTS INPLACE \ --CONCRETE DRIVEWAY I \ AT THIS TIME (AND DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THEM) IT SHOULD BE \ . — // ENCROACHMENT UNDERSTOOD THAT THE PROPERTY CORNERS IN THIS SURVEY ARE S790 2 . DEEMED ACCURATE TO WITHIN 3±FEET OF THEIR CORRECT POSITION. I 04 3(rit- c. ROCK WALL I I III ' I I 7 / Oj x 943.4 x NOTE: 0/ Th I u, 1 ,(5) / ( 943.3 r 63,36 THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROVIDED BY CLIENT STATES, TOGETHER _.) --,., I 17.2 r r r: ',I 5: 3 1 1 L." 944.8 0 -• • ! i 55/-5,5 555,:- '''i' ,',.„,L WITH THAT PART OF VACATED 182ND ST. N.ACCRUING THERETO, BUT NO \ ./ z• - 48± OTHER ROAD VACATION DOCUMENTATION WAS PROVIDED,THEREFOR I 2 I i I 945.9 S.)) I WE ARE NOT SHOWING PARTICULARS REGARDING THAT ISSUE. I / ii-, / \ 1.3-1 ,0-1 7 , J U L ; 9 / )0 7 I /-----1 / •45,9 o 23 LANDSCAPE \) , I NOTE: -H 1 1 r.4. I 0 / 1 . c.,4- zi.jj 75., 0/ I #945.7945'5 C§" ;.__----(p, c8-``) (-,P-CY- x '1 / ,C1,v i 5-II-PI 55I r5,/ 5:55,15`5, ! SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR DETAILS. 0) / / BUILDING LOCATION PER WEST LAKE BUILDERS I '-1--- Lo I y ,..„, - - ,0 r.,' 9,, rs. 7---- .j; 943.6 / 3 , / I / spel 1 .ANDSCAPE __ >c C)ti 15 ,C-' /7 f \ 1 2 / , , 1 / .0 1, 0/ / , *\" LEGEND I I 4 1 0 j \ 945.7 Lu ,,,, co o I / c0 4y /.9'-/ 942.9 \ / 943.4 • \ / 0 0 DENOTES IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET I 0 DENOTES IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND II / °CV il 0 P Z 1 1 I 111111.1.1111\ 111Akj. ,7C)Pc vitasom 4, ,, (I. Lo GA RA GE 945.4 11"-.... / .._ . 945 g 944.* 2' PATH i 945'7 i 2.3. -4, / 9-eSc-f2-- c('Il If!.:-.1 DENOTES CONCRETE I ' 'c5, 944.9) 943.2 .if)\/ .x,' „ -2' 0 404 x924.2 DENOTES SPOT ELEVATION I i 16± ' --- 43./6' 945.6-, T , .. , DENOTES WELL HEAD 9485 .. / NA l 940.34 Itz , , N80° , 0 .69/i/ DENOTES BENCHMARK: 945.55 20 aiizmnn1 6.15 \ / ,A. , I CCC10.± --,: '- 6± S5 GRAPHIC SCALE - 0 15 30 60 90 n r),, ! Z < 1 INCH = 30 FEET r, CN > I I 1 CO N---• 0' 1 d z I m ° SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS P.O. Box 37 HULT & ASSOCIATES, INC. DALE F. HEBEISEN Forest Lake, MN 55025 Surveyors, Engineers & Wetland Specialists Minn. Lic. No. 13590 I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared Phone: 651.464.3130 by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Fax: 651.464.4822 Licensed Lond Surveyor under the lows of the State of Minnesota. E-mail: hultCnfra.com DATE:10/25/ HULT Sc ASSOCIATES, INC. by -"' -', DALE F. HEBEISEN, Minnesota Licensed Land Surveyor REVISED:7/18/2007 SURVEY FOR: ALLEN & PENNY LEPINSKI TOTAL LOT AREA = :.-=-7—=-= 16,222± (SQ. FT.) INCLUDING 1/2 OF ROAD LOT AREA ABOVE THE ORDINARY LOT 12, BIG LAKE VIEW THIRD ADDITION, HIGH WATER LEVEL= 15,338± WASHINGTON COUNTY,MINNESOTA F.-‘' =.=:'' E�n �� (� TOGETHER WITH PART OF VACATED STREET �.1CCD)�--L3�D= PROPOSED CONDITIONS IMPERVIOUS AREA (SQ. FT.) PROPOSED HSE/GAR/PCH/DECK = 3807± NOTE: IMPERVIOUS AREA (PERCENT) ABOVE OHW BECAUSE OF THE APPARENT LACK OF ORIGINAL MONUMENTS INPLACE I AT THIS TIME (AND DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THEM) IT SHOULD BE I i , _ TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS = 24.8± UNDERSTOOD THAT THE PROPERTY CORNERS IN THIS SURVEY ARE I I ist ; E 61•64 S79o34,3�� DEEMED ACCURATE TO WITHIN 3± FEET OF THEIR CORRECT POSITION. I I I Ix f -41.7k 173± NOTE: O I -� - 3. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROVIDED BY CLIENT STATES,TOGETHER I 13 O I —'' �} 6 36 WITH THAT PART OF VACATED 182ND ST. N.ACCRUING THERETO, BUT NO ' > O I I �I _. z -. OTHER ROAD VACATION DOCUMENTATION WAS PROVIDED,THEREFOR 1 I E O I I S _ I` e6 N 48t , , ..„ , WE ARE NOT SHOWING PARTICULARS REGARDING THAT ISSUE. I i o a i (� a ry cr � I 1 I O r—Lo 1 I -- NOTE: o 0 Lu ��t�� 7 I Y i ��� ' '1 , SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR DETAILS. I I , O S / 1 �� ,,/ 4 M I o / BUILDING LOCATION PER WEST LAKE BUILDERS I I, o --c, ;1 - a = II --J� / / 1 I -/ 1 2 r; L f v, I I 1 0/ r LEGEND I I a ��Z ,' _ `''X\� ` ^�� ;� 144aa*v ' r '.a s Q r. I I / (h 0 DENOTES IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET i a�', ± _ TY /JJ \\ DENOTES IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND I 1 .'� ' J �, 1 r.S' I�Q — r1 __ Q �'� / ® DENOTES WELL HEAD I I 161 i> 'O `ic __�_ / J /� I •- 43,16 -_ i Iz DENOTES BENCHMARK: 945.55 I ( ,06•••,•/ *V 0 I ^N o h ;i Z 0 I o 80 2D'18~W 6 �5 .. 469'' �� ( cc I % ,--- I co 10t \ 6t GRAPHIC SCALE I Q I J 0 15 30 60 90 © U I n I Z. 1 INCH = 30 FEET I 1 03 --' o I o z I m 0 SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS NOTES: VINYL SIDING ON ALL SIDES OF HOUSE ALL TRIM BOARDS TO BE MIRATEC. WINDOWS&DOORS WRAPED WITH 1X4 -a Cs- FRIEZE BOARD TO BE IX10 OR 1X8(SEE ELEV) - - ,"' - ,e. , C •- L.1.1 ,60 12 12 R5 6 — -‹ eto u_ iv° La j 1 >, --r, }— — N .„.._______. c..0 r.,!xi° I ,L"-u 64 itt ,_. '- ,,. ,_.__, —r— -- -—--.— P7:0;XS 1 I X8 ' M -----". 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 C ..' . FRONT ELEVATION NOTES: 0 4..--- Li_ C') 1--0"--. 1/4" VINYL SIDING ON ALL SIDES OF HOUSE 1..0 Z 12 ALL TRIM BOARDS TO BE MIRATEC. 61 WINDOWS&DOORS WRAPED WITH 1X4 CL FRIEZE BOARD TO BE I X10 OR 1X8(SEE ELEV.) < LU 0 --"-I >-, I Ivo a Z 'Kw (2 LIJ Z. (,) LLI 0 CL 444 ,tel*sv. 0;34 CL 0,6 1,3"; 04.0 e+tts C ,,---- -- ----....„ oet• 4rr; *4 toty4 ---1— 'n 1.7•'; I X8 ? _ 64F---- _ -r--- , t.& ..rillt -1 • - a ( ,,,, _, ,i--, ---, L. ._ . - -1 t -L., PROJECT NO. ce Z a- 0 z DRA MY BY ce--, °< SHEET: RIGHT ELEVATION uL,- .(., DATE: 7/13/07 . u-c REV —... , . --a--- E....4 g \ ...... , 1 ;,,,,,, ...- s , N N >0::"...•r--- ,-, priz r-Z ll ,.., 0 >"•P'..-- \ ,--. fie, Vi r- ti4.#4. 40,4+2.4. 44 04. ..,...... SO vi, 111.4.10,* +wows Lwow.- 1410'404 ...a.m.,. *..:401,441.! rn x rn .......... +.44.41, __ .•V*II.. 44.11,"40.4, L114' ...,-•,.. ......4... — .:.,..:;, :-....44......:-. I a a o _ J '..:.1 — -- r--• . _ 11 i . 4'.... rn ...- ' r-- rn ),- i .... .... —i 1 ] d 2._ 0 ..<' Z -6 .4 ,........) . ..51_ 4"tr r7; rn ..1> / 0 Z Eli >s< .8 8 6'. - - 4 .- ..1 II I I 1' -1 ;,......11--,-. -1 I i 111 [1111HW H.--------T"' I 1 11111111111 111.;;.'l WWII— a 7,1 ;:virgii,4;itc.04,4414.6 resnivou at.,to( 0 0 F:cx',./'3,c>r Yistilills 0 o >(..., . .. 9.0Z 7 0 >ki h4 00z _ •:;>..';'.F ti 0,141 co›a A> ......— so„,...s., rn ;,,E v:r.z. vr+Os• ';'< o>.•s.m A)mm>0 cc. • 0 rn rn En 4.- '• NOTES: CONTRACTOR/OWNER TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND MATERIAL ON PLANS. Al 0 C,7 0 -cr '-- PURPOSED HOME FOR: WEST LAKE BUILDERS V 02 •,... < Z CZ 0 1714 CRESTVIEW DRIVE HUDSON,WI 54016 --.. Ez •i AL & PENNY LEPINSKI OFFICE:715-386-9878/FAX.715-381-6894 1,689-I 8E-9 I L:XV.d/EiL1/6-99£-c I..L:3DIdd0 , DISNIcial ANN3c1J2 a 910179 IM NOSE1111-1 3A180 M31A1S320 k LLL Ci -, Sel3aling 3)IV7 1S3M :a0d 31/VON agso(Jana z ,... 0. Y 5.: , 0 ut C) 0. 'SNVIct NO 1V/N31.VVY ONV SNO/SN3INIO 11V AdlaA 01 83NM0 I elaDVeLINOD :5310N ,. t , 1 0.ii; r 11111101111111. • ,.. 1. M ,- .IIIIINIMOOM. 1111111111111111011111111111 1111111111111111111111.1 E ...„. 1 4„... , _11 1 I- I I 1,•••: 4.1 0 g • ?, d 0' < >- on Z a 0 .4 .....1 y-9.7 L il_,Li I L 'I I II1:1:11, !MOW WC' s I .. 5E Ili I I '; — ,o-St I- I 1 •., oor • 4, '? LiEi: 0 , '.• iT,:. ,5 ;c'' < t cz!.,...., ,i...........it\r. <— cl.... LL1 u-1 Lu P,' L I .....4 Ul CD IV) ,i 0 '• L 4 ))1i VII i, 111. 4\N N -\U - ''\ ..-\\) ,, \\N V4'" \)',. \:1\\ ---, ....., -1 i Ili. - -.. .so - •-..' -,, --1 ° .1 -ololl • ?.. U \ CK . _ \.." i l• Ili LU Zt:",....,' §I • 17., •••,) ........_ 1 I ,., I _ 8 L.._-.I voigeolt , 1 ' 0 --J ' - -......'\-.. - 2-.oe 9,1, „E'S •‘, ---‘, ' IL_ 0 i .1\4 9 ••••„,< 1..... Al. L 4, t? 1 11.:1,:r.•;Iti•iwt,,o.ltImil.;:;1111w.111^••• ,1'''1, • ommirmitffit,,I•Inl _ 4.1 1 1 - . --- ---1,...1,, ,..,„,-...11Ft• , 111 11- I 1, t.._ 1 • \ (..) --1 y r.•.CI --- IL ,.. 0 1 r 0 go ILI \.... , (....D=1 •?, --r la 10 I /Thm ' -,t \\i !Th ri: . c.K. i.-.. \ .,'... a U < O 0 \..: CI U co Z W !?% \. \- .0:- • ) - '..... -1 a .,._ liwultril ,,H. ,..1 whwtitHinillwiriwiiiridim , . . L „E"-.Zi ' ,S,Z ,Z-,e ' 41-.9 •.0-•I I .0..£1, • • , P6B9-I 9E-5 i Z:XVd/8Z96-99C-S I Z s3J1dd0 1)13N1c137 ANN3c1- I? 7V . . 910F5' IM"NOSCII1H 3/1180 M3/A133ND P1L I en zz. sagali(1g 3)1V7 1S3M :e1Od 31A/OH 03S0cLeincl u .., ,:. Z t.... --. Q >' 0 In 0 ‘x 'SNVld NO 1VIL131VIAI ON V SNOISN31^00 11V AdI83A 01 213NM0/21013V81NOD :5310N i .0-SY • ,!.11 . . It'd 1 ro kT'irr U Sf)U-1 fl le\ c.) ..:( !1' g.i G1 al C1C iliz A.P', a - LLI e;, co n Lu o u ii, 1 1 . .,‹ 1 0 a• i=amans).-.. .. 0 3 It I .4 VT I lir ) ,<4 Z L 8A Z ' I 14 1 .." cy t ce :-..0 i-, u - ‹:( :4•4! 71 ..4.?- ,_,....., ./,__, i I ..01-2 ,:711111r g , ... ., .. ao ' I 0 g, Eo I II Ink ..517 11 NO d' '... wn AllilL U I 11111111111,,,,t1'11.0111,11111,1/11.1111iMliAlilll.r4IPli r,,Iii,81.1.,.111111`iIIIIIPIWIIIIIIIili ',1111114 1 . . .. I IW 14,T6g L. _ N di ..,,.„,,, Iff A \''..‘ :_!' ..,( 22 _ _ ,,I-- , ., ., c?.§ Ce) ' --0 --- 1., . C`.1 i 6 4, ,- 11-rt .-- 13, IC 0 0 Li n P, . ...-‘,. 8 ,-. c,U 1--`21 i'' ',t'; 820 .4 T--a LLI;.) -s(-, EY> 0 z,,,,,,,,L., 00 t,a4 1,,R._,Z k)'A t 4 1 1 '6 ,1§.ft-4. < t > 8 a., - 'CIPA 1 It'14 'N U 0 2 _.. 1 cl 0 / il. 1 d u 1 i ,...: t 1 , , 70 .Thr ,61y :,-..., WIRE SHEV W/ROO I !,1,-Zeit/Viti-s-.- -8.- / ,- , L-_-. - 6Q - . . .., r / ISVIV/IST21Y/IS'ZLIV, r. 1'r' , / S'IMD/053tel/S'IMD Fri : 1 Ir • 11 II --II pi 111,111111i,11,:,i.1,1,10,1/1 . S I- f L r . , %a9IBERZ47'd/Re6mE3E: i o DIEN/1831 A NN d 1g7V y 2 9! IM 90 a N a$O MIAgaa w a § /ddO7Ifl d V71 M '��� �� ( i . / } Q \ }� o o m +VIci NO!m£VIN+v woes 11yw213/1 oa /8013V81NOD 10N tl- ' I- | I II • 0 ( K 2§) »5' } \\ !;§§ / § E 1 \\ »1 w1 h 7 ; § i [|( i ) cg" ;§§L1 . I © 1111II° 0 ±na § § ' 7 t § %2 ` q »na § ;i : $i ) 0 W G1 0 0 I , ! II , , 2 ! | | I . 0 &na « mr ;Q ±ui ' «< '. k § � � § /7 ; f \) ) R / ( was 2 ) 6 2 , l , \/22 4.- 0 \& ■ , I I {I | LEI *) 9 . \ ) 0 \- ` 'i `%2 ) ; $. §§|§( §§ `2 . qW (22 . !«n|§�j P699-I RES I L:XVd/9/96-99E-S1 L:3.DIA0 INSNId31 ANN3d 910K IM 'NMI-1H 3A1210 M31A1S3eID PILL O Sei3C17ing 3)1V-1 1S3M .:NO.d 31A/OH cosocieind z r.. 'SNV1ri NO 1VIN31 YIN ONV SNOISN314110 11V A31213A 01 83NMO/NO1DVd1NOD 5310N C i kw Z 1 P 0 LIC , R ,... to,..,z ... o -3 6- - 0 , p,-a cl,-,t.)--‘9,,,,s L. --i QC Q ,L. u4 a. ‘2'0-0)- „, .9 L..,.., z z z, 0>.7 ,e, —.1 — 19.64 A 7—1 0 2 vl &- c4 cv ck •0 ^ Z Zt cv ce ‹,— "'— • LJ ,7,, v., •<, u.. ,,, Li., -----A Z 0 pz.N _ . 0 I 1-1...1 71 ...- 7.-1 . I --,..- r ..,... • (,),,,-, , c3u, (......, ,.,:.? ( . , 0 k k 2 1 0 z m 4L, 0 z 0 C-i 0 R 2 < -z-- u, z z 6 li z 0.- 0 r 2 0 'VO- u c_ < 0 d p z'--: C.4 w z > 0 X'c a', 9 c6` ; ,, , <0 a‹,0 -- 4 U 0 0 La << ca 0 :.,..1 6 Za I'-•(-) 5 <a<0 6 Z . 0 Cr) , c‘, i<.?.`;9%Y_ -,/g, r'-'r4, N -• N —. Ex N el 0 .0 -,,..R:- ,., ->5.',•1 •'-` N i „...-_u .., a_ cy r (----7- Z-'6 I ... a_ ..‘-Zi.6 oi r "---;U a_ a_ < —3 .-,--, 7 \ _____ - . - - , 0'D N N Z 0 W -- U ::',U •••• ---.I U < > Z .7(h I I \ fll § --- n N ..Z...U N •0 40 a_ ( i shad r. face ‘, <;.; 32154...., 40,..m.d7smythemsecontractrreetirifyaff.w°nsistetetilwfisclgtectUrala:d:bressaryTlema::::„Huintobnenslven':IYsill:ne::ing:8:cldal:cswrs"ctic.nbiandag:'fa:c:43"euimecc°n"wsbYmndaimsred.oilheC°ntractohatnica:7adalerat.bewCand°::::°r etli:b7:1;'scidinga):(18 -4R ('‘ Ni) ) General Notes: \ \ - -X1,77.2 f_ , " 1\ 7. 4- ' , ‘,J \ y \,/ - "k (5)/'11/ the iritent cd the design. ///• . \ / / - // v c5' !fr ,-/ / , / finish grade w,/topsoil.Seeding by Owner. 6. An interior wails are 2x4 unless noted otherwise(U.N.0). TEN EYCK , 7. Ad hibuka doors located 3 from adjacent watt ORD.Ad doors - 4 / size and swing as indicated in the plans. GARAGE (Si / / / 9. All windows and exterior doors to be toewen..Exterior cladding 4'// relish in be clear anodized. STUDIO - / \ 7, 7/ 7// , 10. Bolding elevation 100-0°(T.O.slab)corresponds to survey elevation y7/ 't/ 11. Coordinate&verify' all mechanical and electrical equipment. New Construction ,,;77, themes&locations with the Owner. 12. Coordinate&verify adinterior and exterior firitshes and locations New Scandia Township,MN Iwith ttie Owner. ARCHITECT. _ \ " ( huber i (--') / I architects i! 1 ;11 rf: 1:16-1 / I \ / \ f ))\,- ' ,r _ !). oroprorma porn,prow.,ippon,ropropor, Amery.Copy..renanxklettor.or r tlioaeltutbn peorterood go-pros,.Imrtsan Project NO 06-22.0 I I Date 6/27101 Ai MAIN LEVEL PLAN , Sheet Index: Rewsions ) , s / AO TITLE SHEET/SITE PLAN / 4,---;;;, I I Si ORIGINAL SURVEY PERMIT SET ; Title !f,` A2 UPPER LEVEL PLAN TITLE SHEET& A3 EXTERIOR ELEV.1 SITE PLAN A4 EXTERIOR ELEV.2 A5 BUILDING SECTIONS A6 WALL SECTIONS 1 Sheet Number - A7 WALL SECTIONS 2 (,()H7[ 1,'`, 1()H, I AM) `,1)HVi! \(!rf.1(,, !IsI( Hi\ 11 ,) ,'//1!•>//(!)// AO 1 I-- ---I AlIlk to 477-0" ---77777-T -0, i 1,1'-iTT 78-0" __ 5:111E1111±1e7.-VjT-il, 1 6' (7" ff- ,,,,f- -dr- T"'" .---- 77T___:---- _•' .,-- ":---..-111111B 11 1 ,S. M , 1=1 ' IN'; ', .1 4-, - -7 7--- : 1 r I . all ':1 1— ..,-_,( ' 0 I 1 '1 11 . T T 'T71` 1 1 1 1 ' 1--r ---- - 7-- ---7 --- --- —- i I l 1 {- I 1‘Ill,7,-1 INT,US AIN'T GAP/C,F D7TOR 11 1 1/1 1 1 [ I' TEN EN/CK GARAGE & I 4,,,,,„_4___ 4 '16NtIT,H INS'ilATIO C,NOA,",E D(TOR —1 I 1 I STUDIO I 1 1 ] orrRy 1 , ,---- 102 —1 1 '': 1 t I 1-, tt I i New Construction New Scandia Township,MN I r 11 1 ARCHITECT: 1 , I I/ BOAT STORAGE I I I GARAGE/STORAOC . - - I a I. , , l ) 1 1 [ 1 I,. I' - .9` ' 03 i d a .-!-:',7,1,,.,t;:l:Ic: '1 -l!ii;•.;eh.cubtser 1 i I I i , 1 I 1 i I 'I ,Ilier I 1 1 ! ! UTILITY ) 1 ,,, 104.1 1 1 H. I ttd — - ' / 1 1 1 4 - 4T Allibil. WV .LA,T, WIT'0 I NOP I ti I C I A/711\1 penalise.. Project Na.: 06-22.0 Date: 6127/07 r 1 I Reals1oes: t,14 11 1-11trIt 1 'NW', I CI t IN', 1 0.1,HT 1 PEtAAR'" : I SIA11, 1.4 MAP'," ; 14r.111 I ' 11t11 !I'll Piltli ' '„37/ PIT PAINT 10, LINA', ")7,V,T,TTT. ' ,j17ENE-PE TE IiIi/Lf1(11/' , I,T7W. 1 107 I NI-WE Ilk E MANI 1 EYP tii) PAINT i (,YP HO PMN[ vAi7iF T, i PERMIT SET 1 (..ApmA 7',1,-)p,t,,,;f• , coNck,..fl ,ti/TPGX'T , N'/111 1 ',' Hi =1 i . -11,1 i I T',--, 0,7 2,,,', ,. 1 L ] Tttle 1(14 0111,11E CDI1C,FE1 11 W/I.PDX E NONI 1 E:EP HE, PAN II I yyp HD pAiNT I. i t MAIN LEVEL PLAN '4,/' : ),S III Sheet Number RIt)OM PlIttlittt 1 t-.3CI-ILDIJI 1; Al 1 6 NTS' L J ,- -, i ,E. • . ifilibm'im------17;r, 8'-0" 4-0" 8' IOII B. =E`ligl_, T t i 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 11 TEN EYCK , 1 , GARAGE & II , , 1 ,, , , , , , „ 1 , „ , „ STUDIO ' -I -,' l'''' it --- 11 _If--. --11----lE_ --__.: 11 111F:- lif_ v_- I 1 1 New Construction 1 1 1 II 71 1 New Scandia Township,MN 1 , 11' — - 11 1 I, I, . ARCHITECT 1 I 11 1 \ - ------ 1 I F 1 I 1 1 r)Eci nt+,AAA ADJACE NI ','(AI,IA/WAG))t Al 'A, II 204 I .,-,.. , . A..,.....A. ,. . , . .—. , ..„.„.. (-(VJA':)-I.AtI.FAAA4;(.I.AA. MANI:PAP MOUNT/I)p[p cop, _,, li , 4,- i ___, ‘, '1 I -ITT huber EXERCISE 'I 1 .1 ,..1 STUDIO/HOME OFFICE ii, , ! i , ' I III 11 architects 1 201 1 ., 1 202 ILi 1 1 1 1 1 [ 7- 0/111 6 r: -,.0 Airil Li ,, 14 VI .*# I`, 1 1/2" -#.-— A5 BATH 71 ,, r----'77J 2 0 ,, 1 I 1 -- -. 1-11I- 1i,c- ' 1 1,/ 1 //t I -7 1 Pk/ MANY A(WI I)AAANA—A I )1 )))," 14 Al PI AM ' ' ',--‘ , !-- Ockyy,,,,Otrr,tragYea,lAber AnXXRAAX 1 ') Cr'llk .41'. AX MOW Remora.co.*.roaroauvear,cg, rlislaridabort pectbrestt vol.or A AqarotA wrelnn P....... Project Na.: 06-22.0 Date: 6/27/07 Irr)3,17 I FL,'R [ F,V.,[ WA!L5 CE,L,i1,-; 1 ,I.,T,,-"' Revisio ns: , , I 1 '2(," ,/..,•-4--1,--J, ',, P,)fte,i, ,,,','' 1 yip:, 1 (.'''P 51) mAIAI II I A A, FAA AMAII.,I (f.),AAA II.. , y,i r,,,,'- F MAI'.I.) 1 MAI)I.), ' IIi'm 1-,,) l';',,,,,,', ' ,(" BD )It•V,I ,,,.-,,I-, 'I 203 BATH i ill.t ilLf ' GYP I PAIN I 1 ,-;•6-' i3;) MAIN I 1 ./A),M)i) PERMIT SET r)/4 (I()AM Di LYING ',IN I .f Title I i 1 UPPER LEVEL PLAN I i Sheet Number A2 '1/4,117.) N TS L _i 1--- —1 OL'EPPE 0 I,CEDAR FASCIA ',,,,,,,N ,, N, I CEDAP LAP SIERAIC V4/65 I XPOSLIBI --. 1 -- AND AMPIPED CORNERS SRI . /I)5- , , 51151— 'I -1 AE,„,WINDOW HEADS- 595 CIDAP :R I7 IN I 5E5 - - _ 4 I AMNE)(55V HI A N D PE +8-05 8 HS r'57-57-,- ,5- _-5,75- 5-9 WINDOW HEAD '1 7E- 1 1 lh' tI!" It 1 9 1 --if 7, 5011 ,5, / IR 101, 7 /ir 45 RPM VI NEER TEN EYCK I Ai10:CA 1‘,.t)S II EL P / APAW)-0E1 4RA 5& 5/A 4 --11 11111 11.:- 1 / \ [ 1,z/\sjIil II/ \ 10 / GARAGE & PP1 M I'NPR fir.0 r 1 AJ ',(1,7PPf A` STUDIO / / I -7,7\---1[__ _ _ Pa j,J P_RIFilMj55)11p7IATIA1)1750SIIIA_s',5 _ _ 7 .,55_55:75505,5557,7,58,7,7 5 ,57 JAV r ,II -A = New Construction _illi,,5205 A\II IP' A1VI 1207 A I L 197PLIALIOILLD IA LA' SCUPPIR571 ri 5 F.57,-m-E-_,75, 5555,. -95 57----7y 5 8 s-L-754/Ls55,54b5 #75,-_=-15.541577: 55 0 WORKERCEU:In 5,5311BI'5,0/19,..955 1-0 :UPI LOOP 0,,Eispi 7 __ -, - - ------- -- - ------—------ k:?-.---:-:------ --=‘V---=-=-1-7L'T---,-----...`-'7-7-1?-1-77-;.- --7Ii-1--i-f--1.-7-.1- --1-E-1 __I ____ _ .__ New Scandia Township,MN 7 .,5„:-, '''' '-i,=.1., _= r-- ,p,,,,,,'‘,L LYYJP,M1AR AR A rA,[ 9,7,5R HI AP - i-----1,--t=r - J. H. .9' 05 ABOVE CARACI SI AB 1[10-t11571 r - 1:5=_r ARCHITECT: .,4"cf DAP OLCKINI5 'RAI MR 1 1 PAN JOISTS AN IRPOD BE AM 5p ISA -I' 1 11 , Pri 3-75 5_ 55t11 11 .E1-0,m5-1-:-__R_1 )55,955.9):799,75,:mm9:59.) J1555715;11.51751,-";ii557515PII11115 Al huber A _il_i_11 4: PI2/AN5E55 C'4E NDAEI. A, _ 4 1E.1,. architects NSA AS i ,,a7,:ii 1 0 IERI SL.15iIiii ___T-51 ; II =s . --i 1: 1A,'-A.1=' '—i I I 100 R I 1 I MITA',PAPAP,, DOORS 50 MAID'I-MI4:1 -1- ,s ! 1 ' 4 r‘i`,)[-(1-E1 ' r 5 15- 51k' _ _,„__.-__- _ 0 , __, 00 5_0 , _.- IIIRNRUCKI I 8 AA,Pi QUIRE() AND MITEPED,11,PNI.111, C5N -- -- 9, rc 5,__ __ -5 _„ ,_ -7- I 1 1-] I A Am5 PEDAP OE!:PIP, __ _- SEAR, 000M/56115,500W 5 q A',A :1, I-1 i ,-,....o.s... k...,.4....r.rmg,....-v-,r,..,,,,- WASP,00i HEAD!Ii51-10 - - ---- - -- - -s! - - 1' 1 'J• -1-ri--7 12;_c_ r..LLHLIF il L. 1 or . EL 4 8 5) - -- t AB:705A TI R R:I!t AA',IN, E5PI 4/A A& A/A4 '7\ DAA 7IIIIIII 1 / A, _V 2710 Cf DAR JOISTS-PT / __A5A1 EDI%A ,.IIII l'A-V-_,D, _DI 4E 'ET ,4 75C,,A, I i ,/.3 711:1 „IIANNIL WLED 1`„,Z -an •7 7 ty5:55'p785 LE): : I 59/85-5 c5-,{5,5 . , la A 1,51)A5,RI)E5/4-0 I 1117 Copy.,"2o07.....1 woe.orparteeeta. ...O.*...rina me.....ar... F 0 '1111:1,5YJIP 5115ii PI 109:551.15-At/B575-555- ---E r-- 1 5-DI OR-DAL 1 L ,,,„__ . . -, i,i SIAM 15)51P 5 /11555-51,517 9 9185 , , [1 Si Ai ANT Bf:RIPEN 511BI : ": 59515 ANIC PPE,Ars:CAP L - Pi-BRA:7T CAP ON(1)PPER ........pruiI.II.w•Insatzt exp..).well., 1,01.161162. Pruject No.: 06-22.0 AAN FIA5RHINE Date: 6/27/07 7 y4(,.._L A,LAA E1PNA, SEA) 5550 5 , . - 1,1595 41'5'5MY VP75,55-P 5 . Revisms: .',..; , A N I IP E-5 • 5 --- L',DAP PARRA P I ir 0,55 ' IONCI-1 II r E AM t>01)B P I 5-5. .• PERMIT SET 45 RION) V1Nt'Is 05.55 P 5 55,5553MP, , 5 2.12-i-05aP 55,50P55 1310 OH - _p----- 1 -0007TET,50,5 s,E 1/A 5 I'I 5 0.. TRW , 1 1. [ EXTERIOR ELEV.1 - T() GAPAPR. AB LE 011, 355 , Ep-i4555: it Ji.i, E I EXTERIOR " . I t- , , -PPOrmitE VACYR m I ---- 7 I I 5 5 I I I — '5; :5.'55 I:F55.1"IITI'50 571:1 i-505_1°I0I5511'I,,,51555 5'155511 Sheet Number 1 Vi s .. , 0 „2",,•_,' L _I VP' I— 1 1.6 A I I I ,1 j PP(1,NiSHEN STAN:DAG St AM 1 I I I EET666_ , It` ETE.PPED Et SE DAP'ALLDA 'lit GE I) I 1' 5."-tEE KM ER ETA-L.-Ls:: , L _1 ,)..,,,,,c..EXPI;')JPE -t -EE'Et--HTTTII11/---27_111" YANDCAA1 NE Al) TEN EYCK ,4;iiu„, ,Eirri -EN l'EDE AK GARAGE & _._ ___„ ._____________ ,. .„..-- ,.... STUDIO r, AEOP(Cr,"i SUB(LOON 1.1.1.11iii ED r==Es=88.„- E"-8-6T,-1-6=8"-{ "-"'":"I-"ftr.1-- ,..--- ,---'" --1. -r'r -----1---..,:;_Li I--- ,, ', `,00;1'rtit New Construction New Scaridia Township,MN 1---_,cir,--1_-:',._—_L4-- -- ,66),...Er ELF'Ai S,l),P,A .' 7 _ _ _ _ 54/4 CA DAB Of DKIND-St Al ARCHITECT:i BrA55, BIB 445,11,574.555,55,54,,,,,,, Hudson WI 6.010 AKBIAMPT ........— ... E d_'_dE ET .8',_.. ..... .... . . .._. - ;+8-17, IIEJIT.II(E.GEItEr1,1-1,- huber 4'II IOB1)54I VLNELP"'EVER,DDLUMN „,,, architects ., , ., , ___, _,., t,_- .,_- ; =_ -r-_ _F--_„s, ' 'I----1-'--' ,,,,,„,',•";;/ 1 I i Er CA8ANE SE AB 2tI2 CEDAR Digt,,BD BI 'I I I , ' I I 511° - B,115,)1.) II 1 I 1 I i 1;15, 1 I C.)IA 15 I 1 L ..... ......_ 14 SL(YEk-E)RiND / --- ,( ,2 --, CABLE RAILING--/- - _ .. AN(I(X-I(PI D sOiLNi PS Stri ---- "i-- YrINDEM HI-AL, DECKING GE Al `5,-- 4".:••=-,......-71 .• ., 8" __. . _ _ Z ----6- ti III- ' 2810 CEDAR JC(ISEIS -- 4,E .E___J GI , AC 5 BE,A iLitirT5165'Bj! 255 I Al IP:151 sip 1 A 'Cr AEC.6,;/"Ar"6,;(81EXELP C.E)EFL IGDE/6 1 t 'it+. LE I I/ Cop,0441%2007.....*Pkrantatv.b.incts AN MOW ii•ORVIILL Crowtop.rapro-1....on.or I 0 6E1,"1 GrE 9t r'8 -1. --S,pEi' I! 1,1 3 I at6 1T- 41 LI 5 31 5/4" 1 . : P•nrilmsloa. JIF Project No,: OB-22.0 Date 8/27/07 TEE, r,-, _I „A 1, _66- L.6.-I .i.E ` 1 r _I _Tx _ .,.-' II:AI_ if -,„;_f) IL- Revisions: T-1., -'' : -Er-4-LE-"11.;: L it-6=-6+ IL- E +t-E.---16- --86---'-LT-1 ---E;I=-1, I, I , •I's'.'i s I :. II- I s.I ,71 tit ' 1-I r RE-1 i 8.1- I - E T'4 Ex-+ r I 1 1 +-i E.T-DT ILIE L. PERMIT SET i.,i 1 1 i i_ [ --,, , I 1-441'---f A 1 1,1-F---i..L'' 1', I- lir':17,' L_ i--'r''''''- ''''----1-74;7---Tr-„I:-'-1--Li4:1----7-+='1.- -r. -{' 8 1 I I. , 1-71 5---t ' -I II '- r '' it ';' " ;'/ EXTERIOR ELEV.2 T o [NIPB 51:1451,O0/4 5 ix_ IOBBBI/LB..-TL... 'oo1L1-Is =I_-_-,'-4.s,„s I--__ I II--; ; _1.----=-',1--,:, -,-,-.-. , .-r_s7s—LL 7-1 IS7 I'LLI I ss, -- II ; , c.AP:,(.., SI AR 8" Street Number I , 2/\J1()r\I A4 L _J I01111111k 11 lY 0 a $C,..) Z hi a`a to o _x gpp U Ill LJJ P. ju ! Q Z L C, go VI Cli) I— .-,'— w— _—\ 1 1 1 II I ' j4._* L' 1 - -. 1 1 1 1 rr ii 1_ f— 1 \ i i' �1 I 1 1 / \ ._.. , (I) I'. is T C..J CC ...... J PREFINISNC[ Milk ROOF E.0CYI SE —ti � - B. ref .yi)OnEx SF( 72jAa t OR tYf l A.dOQf _1_ hi?(it DAM IASCI A-,FN.- y ,. A --- TYt'ICAt kH MAIN tAIDINC.;(AM k(if,A EFlilsr'tD MU TAI TAM !. AM R7Oi 1 --_--I -la AND WA i'ER SARIS, RIM BOARD >UR-FASCIA - -._ AgAF PLYWOOD It THICJO .948 AMP DOSFiEA n --- - -X j o [ a \ T FF ' ' , � 1 ." ,( /,,� );_. _ , ar-,ARDFR VAPOR H.JABB[M BOARD-' 8 cv IM r;rAk. [t oNt ,oErll ! �1 TENlsK P t(TY(PLYWOOD r.r .,-o 100vR,xt As . — Fr 1 1A f f HiO 7Ni,/ / COMM„DR ,EE A [ ,,,„,,A/ RBA"BOARD i1D [A,:A k X.1 x J STUDIO � k SEs FJt< O.,. cwR-AN d New Construction 4 1{ [ Oi.( NS of i1N'. Ae v( y 7` S l ; :: a Top MN FAr(R �� '�, �vN��r a C8 FCIT V — c' AR YWG6D 01 v.._. O V a 1 i'v r+ANi N - ' N1 N 1. S T(- vIA iJ 1NSJlA TED Ff AUN- — _ ,r 'ABBE R G `,,;r -�'.i - — p rid .. IfM LAs., _-. Y.� -_ i - 651 2 S>]Y - ry �DW l ,,.,A fA a �. , IYA .,"LAR sariDf4�NA,� -... fA„�HIF �1�F,�r� huber > F U 1A(r R F 1 KIN„/Gt7NNES7t0E'� B amr --, ,� • I , i � architects IA'ERL `AMt 1 rr� y r- .,0td,E8,:1VA F 1/A,. (,F f o�W WALL, "A n, DAPAP d a E%r3. SORB u :/i fi,,:C {('> 'AR)Ei[AM IN rpglr " / 1 A UIIDINC P IER PRECAST I W 'IC r'.., HA k:I . 'K JI f A ri.v_ �u )AIN,A (Aj ',, Ou i f)N AN Pf f 1 -, ''' f3f1(.6(1lA (F f Pf FINISHED ME TAl iUJFP — ;;' r i tt IV( X in 1 ,y, f .:' _ . �K�. 1 'cy ,, +aa,diF FA, V. ra,n ra,=�rrrro'N,# 1 i'ERIMET( \ 1 P` D APING 04 v A. �� n ��� 2rF, 1 1, t - h�3y A'INL h`l Y Y FDI Pt ff 2UU a v �r���J' 6 t, l& Y400,; k i(I. RIPP EI f(y1JP _ 1 --_-_ NI\ i)C) tt C`t_tj -. X 1(fN 6Yf fJ r(r)OY lf21 1 fi xl k \ , J C �,. , ANv 1t PFuNS11) (, - y A IV;Pt Si fl 6R41- 1 >/6"AX 1 X GYP>FM[,OAi?D_P7. MI IA1l,.A — ( ! r�`,t JF OP TARN nt,29 L4 N_ BOB{;IA 'Ix WOO fRAMiA AS % U f (I C, (off INSUI,SII)N /� "1 1 RR BRAT,' ON rR R',N Rut JAMBS AND 1 1,4 HEAD --� �.y NON f .CC �J�XI 7A1 IIR AL' �_ J THIN; f 1 r vVWI 7 F 1 k WOOro f'AW IANDINc W/ I a v,��.� I r Iul)'WC ./n 5 1 Y tR(irip --_- 1! Vj Hi% I I U ION - e_r r inftneem_ £)fv;' 1[ - Yosnbeote 1 1 L� t:J_ -1'vr /ar +.n.wwa c n,m. +m 7 1 - F ! �z < Project No.: 0✓022.0 0 /4 0 Cr . 814 - ? 1 F 7 H ,ARD H rfn rFA/ �r / 27/07 2'Pi Al l Y. BBB,. . n 1 IJ W/d4 EI, f RA I 4 E l'� Vt`.1 t ' _ 1 �� ,AB,IA EX t NE,k' I� ! .,c �O� - ( r.. RABBI %1 RC iF., N a 0. "* Fe[ j R o vo Ah Mn. :41 J CA A,, SHAD / i A _ 3 '' rF v s rf o „ z x.•,, „r .xV,2 xs:r PERMIT SET oI HF T� ANr,w wk.,. 0:'FM HFCID IN'All A r �1.1 1 11 \ 1 0E ,m1 a,:r; ,ND WI i)i .,RF r; MOB / /`.. '.Ri N i S Y.c I t FJA- }.to. 1 � • WALL SECTIONS 1 • 1 t ()N:WA!I., , - .'. 2AD NI Jg11 .A! m:H ,; IP - 1f 4� d ^ : J r �N,Y/ F fOt r IA R f I, PI lA FN I , {'v iq'F[1 .,I ,ON 0 1( aAr 1 71Rf F )NSP t ` ., r ns'vJ., 6.WA! - - @API R A-„LR A Rf(-88 D "I'(+ R A Pi WIPE, r A'; J,F1 ,v ��+ Ir `Y,' � `F" 4 CHJ Y£:r iF SA AR 4 CON Hr 1. UAH ? � i ,)N(, 1L?+3 { [ , I / EA AlM R .xi 70, zM Sheet Number I „ ',; \AV\I 1 ''-.,,! '-, 11 ',,,,,, A6 (-7), F n ,i(,-., ii„,,,, 0 0) ,,,,i),__,. ,), L 1 I . ■ f ,„,,A,PfENISTWIT NI NA STANDINC,'TAM ROTA -- . A AT E IDWA7F )HE 1:1 Ad fTTAWOCTD SILL ATHINC - OPEN VwA ROOF R SSES NATI INATJLALION — - E 12 AA7 fOF P( il_ROOF 1 l'LA NETARr r A.ONATnIIr I f1 ACS / . C'>PSUIA BOARD-AT. TEN EYCK ri I-, �, 1 rr v { X y. X I1AM tO�ARU,to17 fASLIAz CEDAR FaSaA-P, GARAGE & /` /`� /',,_...,1 �/X i,Aj 1 ij l' )(Y.y.) J'j:j14 ., ,��t `✓�.J..-/ !. �: - ) ,_ fit.IPII'r�. i.,.,,S ,FOR pan:(.J_RHANG w Construction , X� ��. s � � �_ :_tom ' New Scandia Township,MN -i� o ,t TAEeT PT _ I I I „>y ARcrurecT: :',,,i,..,,,,l7i.:.:. 3""........rd /, I Ili Az huber architects 'J I. LOw WALL TYPICAL Wail 1NS11 J IION. },4• �= t ]AY ✓INb W/A DP. IA,PTTII(ANT;PAPf.R 1 Y r ii2T '.40OT)SHE 67HINO 4 1I D FRAlAN CT 1 F N;J.A iiON VAPOR GP RFTAP 1ER HTADTT.-SAE STRo, r 112 f VIA FTA1AATiT-Pi. .�- 7, t ` Y I HARD'C AlHE SIN. �77 N: / C,N I AlU[61(`E / 11 i / X X /' A ! A /f /T / X JY X , fi. 7\ i T Y'\- ) OL ,R.,,E -1' �� / / I j tit ARP-SEE STROCIURAL - -lr I fWJ„ I 'J IQN11. fINS^IEIOOP SEE AAD- 31e,& PL'SITTAIDOP y A(P p Alk EN >P P W,B TLATP TAtJAAT: -FIATT PNSIA AIION + AP 'Y GYP t AIR WAI I`,-PT ( a l I ,t!YG4 j ,,,,,, I 0 NI Man. F.I PINE CAP -T -TP1A 16 AU p,r_it 4/ 4 0 t r Project No.: 06-22.0 • -212 ,KIf A>.T W/ (may' 6'27/07 . T. P ,p E[ ru 1 i A IL,Wc Gt - • # rDRArN,,,t PT Revisions: I A7E N W, nNn1g h_ I Ff.. '1 N I tGARAGE ,EA, .LL r�:,: ,7 T - t--f .,�,c7 Z,'^ . ,r, 7 ., ram Jll Di-id dI PERM(T SET \ V . 111_:-tily . -p1 HIr Iw,rtl[ lite S �,1. I<' ANA{ Al TRJCTIOJ all r� A rcuN, w WA.. l MO INSULATION asB1 A n 1II , WALL SECTIONS 2 h f 4 t115PAC fEI AND Or/ _ lid PT DIANT iAN'IN( /i d 1�A a'T.I P H/ Al IIF RADIAN,IIONN _ 3.X., TX.„PD Vt - t A 6 IArc6F A P Ob1R/D g A IANARST[ I l A-I,1r E E SLAB , . Sheet Number APIAi �:�- !'ON WALL Lc LioN A7 '�6 ,,/2.._,._O.. �, 2 1�2..._,_D.. L J CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY PROJECT LOCATION: I RECEIVED ,..,\, ,,, FOR: CATES CONSTRUCTION BOB TENEYCK RESIDENCE 13500 182ND STREET NORTH n\,.. ,,,-' ' MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN -i'- .. ti*.? -' • n• \ 01'r5 I'Yo CITY OF SCAND1A PROPOSED BUILDING DETAIL 4- ,c, 2 —-- CY C 0 \ '.--, 4 ...''. ...'".. o ..,, -- I ....**7.,..9,k-r-' 1--)\ --- / \ - -- .. 'iSo 1., la"'• '0' ii- ,,'-'2 1.° ' - 1 r° 57 3P' '0 "a• ''''' / u, ', c OP 'S' u• , ,,..i % ,....) 7:2)• ....." / '-';'') ' 'Q,,_, ' --',i t, %\.00 k.-..) 1•..:.\-- .1 if er.. 7÷--- -\)j '''',C") .0 ..0 ''' \-'" ,3 . r =.-,--• '-7.-.. ---"=,-,. 7, / \ ----- —=------r- - •-CP- '' t-,C'''- - -- 4 0' t 4.,0..- ........... .... = \\ Illir \ ' / NOTE: ,y, -,- / , _ -' NORTH EXISTING CONTOURS PER - ,,e`I` •,L3r4 i .„...,„ .;,, 4V WASHINGTON COUNTY 1 -- Se'r ‘ 4-0-'.Ck z-I ‘ ' I ORTHO PHOTO DATED ... ‘, ' -1-1, ' \\:\s„.....___ I'IIIII ,_,A ' ,,o,,, I 0 60 120 APRIL, 2000 1 ,,, r :',-.), - r''''''--' e , 'i57'.'''-'13'1; / ' 2 \\:-I'-72-'75)'-)-?-'' !IIIIIII LEGEND: 0 \ c-, : 7116j-,SYMBOLS DESCRIPTION — I 111111111111111M / SCALE: 1 INCH = 60 FEET . .. • i--) PROPERTY LINE --- \ , / .i // ''' / / ,-, .."' EASEMENT LINE --- ----- 19''E ) -' P I '' 41)).„..,. ; NOTE: • DENOTES FOUND IRON PIPE N83° 14 -- ' /-,- -",,,,... / - - ,P • / , ..,.,-,,,, ,, , 3 u•,,,, - , --- ,, ,..4 / ,, •E] DENOTES OFFSET HUB ' .,__------- , „ -' _ ,, ,, EXISTING CONTOURS PER (-185 0 DENOTES EXISTING ELEV ills 2,ND ST. N. \, - .„---- ,,,,0 , ,_ y_, , ,,,----- , <,;',5 /:-'-'''-::''''''''t.:--)'-' / 'T ,.' ,, ) . WASHINGTON COUNTY ORTHO PHOTO DATED (q37 3 ) DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION 1 — s' iEJ Ir . \ \ _ APRIL, 2000, 1 ES 1 , )--"1" \)i'I , - .() - , SUPPLEMENTAL --41 /• 4, (-5- ,•,:.- CONTOURS AND AS , ce i 1 C,„1,,,.. I 0, /\ -- --\ \ / / / z)/-\'', ' ,/,-. <,, BUILT INFORMATION s.„--,- A--- -, 7 ,i.J ' -9-- - - MERGED ON 2-16-07. 1,2,--233.90 ------ 1 ))., \ ,k\--- ,, , ii •„. R-,---6000 ,„ ,7 — \11' '' ' / A,---223°21 '43'' -,,' „//' /1 AREA: / I-- .,_ '-- ' ','" 0\ ' 1 \ ,N ...0 \ _ c_ ( *I / --- „, _ , ,, / 1 '', __\'' 0 ''-''''' \ --- / 4,, 7- Suite#B100 3.7 acres more or less to the edge of water , \ „,.-\ 1:1 -- \' ' \ \ ' \ // -. ' „ , .,- ''25/. / ,- \ 200 East Chestnut Street 1 .68 acres buildable as shown on the 1-../ _ zr = \ ---\ <, l , ....._, -1 t _ \• ._,, ,-,1„‘1,„1, ,„' / :c_ % , s .`„;Q"'''' ''' ,. -._ z>. \ Stillwater,MN 55082 preliminary plat .:f-J-1_, - r--- - ,-._-,--- \ .s,\ 7 - , ' 1,- , ,„, ..[-/0,--6,,U,,./ „,, , \ \ - /:5L,0() , \ I ' \\ Phone 651.275,8969 \\\ (.__:__----"--- \ 3 1 (./)i r 5 j.__ . , 1 \ \ 'f f'. Fax 651.275.8976 cfiC.N \ , ., - t ' -<<' \ . , , +. , ,, ' A76, dit-CSIS@ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: c\.? ,:„,. ,_.; , \ (ft-cc. ,--' __,' ..t.. ,...-, , ,/ '1 . -- - 12, \ mcleodusa Lot 5, Block 1 THE BLUFFS OF EAST BAY, „, ‘,..1., =3/ i co • i--. / \ .i--7-6-) \ , e.,0,,, „. • __ \-. .. net l''.. ''". :1)7: • \--, --,I,____-- amilo. ... , Washington County, Minnesota. LIJ i \ - PROP, SILT FENCE I hereby certify that this survey \, plan or report was prepared by me '': <1 ; i , < 1./ ' ::_<1.,, ! ,,,,, ' or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Land - l -,T- Surveyor under the laws of the e of Minnesota. REVISED 7-12--07 a, , .,, .,_ ----- -.== --- ''/'/ 2-16-07 \ .,_, CORN ERSTON E REVISED 10-29-02 c•- 889°58'42" W / DANIEL L. R ES License No. 25718 ate 9-24-02 I • ----- • _. - .\-, , '"-, ,...kIAJHAC,::: & UTILT-'''' EA SE--.11ENT .. ', , - - , -.„.--_ LAND SURVEYING, INC __ , ,_ '- _ _