7.b 2 2 Gacek - letters submitted regarding Gacek IUP application (2)August 10, 2016
To:
Re:
FROM THE RESIDENCE OF: AUU .) ZFU ! tl
Robert and Paula Anderson
21170 Newberry Ct, Scandia, MN 55073 CITY OF SCANDIA
651257-2016
Scandia city council members:
Scandia Planning Commission Members:
Scandia Mayor:
Washington County Commissioner:
Chris Ness, Jim Schneider, Dan Lee,
Bob Hegland
Christine Maefsky, Dan Squyres, Travis
Loeffler, Walt Anderson, Tom Noyes
Randall Simonson
Fran Miron
Proposed Interim Use Permit/ 12680 Scandia Trail, Scandia MN
Dear Randall Simonson,
I am writing on behalf of my wife and I who reside at 21170 Newberry Ct, Scandia MN 55073
On Tuesday August 2, 2016, one of our neighbors approached me stating that there was a public
hearing scheduled that evening to consider an interim use permit at 12680 Scandia Trail which is
located on the north side of Hwy 97 from our home. If approved, it would mean the owners of
that property would have a commercial business hosting events with large numbers of people,
added traffic, considerable noise and alcohol consumption. This was the first that my wife and I
had heard anything regarding this.
When we attended that meeting, two things became very apparent to us:
1) There was an overwhelming number of families (standing room only) who strongly voiced
their opposition to the proposed event center. Most of which also had little or no advance
knowledge of this.
2) There was clearly a great deal of advance planning, advice and direction given by the city to
the owners of said property. This was made clear by the number of zoning requirements
which they seemed to be trying to accommodate.
A number of community members voiced their concerns regarding noise levels, traffic safety,
unsupervised alcohol consumption, diminished property values, effect on the surrounding city
nature trails and overall peace and enjoyment which we, as a community, were under the
impression would go unchanged.
(continued)
On Wednesday August 3, 2016, my wife Paula went to the residence at 12680 Scandia Trial and
spoke directly to the owner Jeff Gacek. Jeff seemed to be a very polite and sincere person. He
spent quite some time showing Paula the structures and explaining the planning that had gone in
to the proposed facility. He emphasized that his original plans were on a much smaller scale. He
had not planned on as many venues or customers as was indicated at the public hearing. He also
showed Paula the restrooms that would be used and had not made any requests for portable
facilities. He went on to state that it was the city who had recommended that the numbers and
accommodations be made higher.
This makes it very apparent that the city has long had an "agenda" regarding the proposed
facility and IUP and has been assisting the owners with furthering that direction without any
regard to the community's homeowners as a whole. Such favoritism or "Spot Zoning" should
never be allowed.
I am certain that you have received an overwhelming number of logistical reasons from our
community as to why this IUP should be denied. It should be pointed out that our own daughter
was struck by a drunk driver only a few minutes west of that residence on Hwy 97 just a few
weeks ago. Some of the residents' concerns may also include added stipulations requiring the
owners to further demonstrate.
For us this decision is very simple. If an entire community is overwhelmingly opposed to
such a venue and vermit taking place, then the city of Scandia has a responsibility to
uphold the wishes of the communi as a whole upon which it serves
My wife and I share our community's recommendation to deny said permit.
Thank you in advance for your consideration,
----
Robert Anderson
Homeowner
Paula Anderson
Homeowner
August 8, 2016`:�C E-y9r ED
TO: Scandia Planning Committee AU -,
12 ZU1
Scandia City Council
Mayor of Scandia CITY OF SCANDIA
FR: Chris Ferderer
21602 Meadowbrook Ave N., Scandia, MN 55073
RE: Gacek Rural Event Center Permit Application
Hi! My name is Chris Ferderer. My wife and I have 3 children. I am a resident of
Meadowbrook Ave North. I was disappointed to find out about the possibility of a rural
event center amidst this residential farmland. Not only have I lived at this address for
several years, but on July 19th, 2016, 1 closed on the adjacent land to build my new
home I have been saving up years to build. This took place the day before the letter
was drafted and mailed regarding the Gacek Rural Event Facility. I was devastated and
shocked to learn about this and would not have purchased my land had I known. I have
many concerns about the proposed Gacek Rural Event Facility, and I am asking that the
City of Scandia deny this permit application for the following reasons:
Currently, I feel the intersection at Meadowbrook & Hwy 97 is dangerous. It is a poorly
marked road. When traveling eastbound on 97 there is a large hill prior to the left-hand
turn. When I am waiting to turn left onto Meadowbrook, cars come flying up the hill and
often don't have time to stop. Therefore, they are coming into the right turn lane to go
around me. When there is a car preparing to turn right in the turn lane it becomes even
more dangerous. I am anticipating having multiple cars turning left onto Meadowbrook
for an event, and that will create an even more dangerous situation because the cars
traveling 55 MPH up the hill will have little to no time to react to the stopped traffic.
What about the safety of my children and pets out enjoying a beautiful day? It would
disrupt our lifestyle.
Here I am, living on rural Meadowbrook Avenue with quiet, peaceful surroundings. Now
there is a potential for a parking lot way larger than the Scandia Plaza which holds
approximately 45 vehicles and the Gammelgarden Museum which holds over 30
vehicles. In fact, it would be almost the size of the huge 118 parking spots in
Community Center lot right in the middle of this rural area. It doesn't make sense to
place parking in a quiet rural setting that seeks to overtake the amount of available
parking in our city lots.
In addition, I visited the website for Redeemed Farms and was extremely taken back
and disappointed to learn that reservations are already being taken, including those for
overnight stays in the bunkhouse. Is it okay to proceed to set things up commercially for
2 Y2 years without notice or intentions being given?
Instead, the public is going to be allowed to come on any given day and disrupt the
tranquil setting we currently live in. It would change the entire living situation. It is not
right and we do not deserve to be subjected to unwanted traffic, noise, lights, loitering,
and other disturbances to our peaceful neighborhood.
I strongly urge you to think about my concerns and reread the criteria listed on page 3 of
the memorandum distributed regarding the Rural Event Facility and how it shall meet
applicable standards for the IUP and AOP regarding:
*"Impact of proposed use on the health, safety, and general welfare of the occupants of
surrounding lands, traffic conditions, property values, and scenic views. Our scenic
views of the landscape will now become views of people at events and cars in a parking
lot during our entire spring, summer, and fall seasons when we love to be outdoors.
This applicant has demonstrated blatant disregard for the codes and regulations that all
others are expected/required to adhere to. The City is setting a dangerous precedent if
someone is allowed to build and launch any business they like and then ask for a permit
after the fact.
As a resident and neighbor to the applicant, I plead with the City Council, our Mayor and
The Planning Committee to not allow one individual to destroy this beautiful, peaceful,
rural neighborhood that so many enjoy for personal profit.
Sincerely,
Chris Ferderer
ee
C.o !
Augustin, 2o16r'��p
TO: Scandia Planning Committee AUG 12
Scandia City Council
Mayor of Scandia CITY OF SCANDIA
FR: Mary -Lee Fee
13170 Scandia Trl. No
RE: Gacek Rural Event Center Permit Application
As a property owner/resident who lives near the Gacek's, I am asking that the City of Scandia deny this
permit application for the following reasons:
1. This proposed event center would create a traffic and public safety scenario on Hwy 97 would
be extremely dangerous and put myself, my family, my neighbors and anyone else traveling on
Hwy 97 at a very high risk of injury or death.
i. This would be a deadly risk for all of the children that live on Meadow Brook Ave.
3. I'm requesting that a formal traffic and safety study be conducted.
4. I'm requesting that an environmental study be conducted.
5. I'm requesting that a noise and light pollution study be conducted.
6. It appears that the setback requirements do not meet codes.
7. It appears that the noise amplification distances will not meet codes.
8. It appears that the large historical barn was moved onto the property without a permit.
9. This proposed event center would decrease my property value significantly so that one
individual could run a for-profit business in a zone that is specified for agricultural purposes.
10. This proposed event center would destroy my ability to enjoy the rural character, scenic views,
open windows, nature sounds and quiet countryside that I moved here for.
11. This applicant is already running this business. You can book a wedding reception today at:
http: /Ire deemedfarm.0r
12. The applicant's website includes information about rentable buildings for overnight stays which
is never mentioned in the application.
13. This applicant has demonstrated blatant disregard for the codes and regulations that all others
are expected/required to adhere to. The City is setting a dangerous precedent if someone is
allowed to build and launch any business they like and then ask for a permit after the fact.
14. This applicant is not a resident of Scandia.
15. This applicant's existing investment in his proposed event center should not be a consideration
for approval. If the applicant failed to follow the proper process, or the proposal does not meet
the codes of the city—that is the applicant's responsibility.
16. This proposal was met with loo%vehement opposition at the first public hearing. There were
no attendees in favor (with the exception of the applicant) whatsoever.
17. As a resident and neighbor to the applicant, I plead with the City Council, our Mayor and The
Planning Committee to not allow one individual to destroy this beautiful, peaceful, rural
neighborhood that so many enjoy for personal profit.
I also feel Mr. Gacek misrepresented his intentions when he asked permission to move the barn thru my
property. Although I initially denied his request to move the barn across our land, he told me he wanted
to have occasional worship services and really needed my cooperation. This resulted in cutting down
several large oak trees to enable the barn to move through my land. I feel duped by this dishonesty.
Sincerely,
Mary -Lee Fee
R�.Cr'!VED
August 8, 2016 AUG 1 11 M-10
TO: Scandia Planning Committee CITY OF SCANDIA
Scandia City Council
Mayor of Scandia
FR: Gary Olson
21602 Meadowbrook Ave N., Scandia, MN 55073
RE: Gacek Rural Event Center Permit Application
Hi! My name is Gary Olson. My wife and I built our retirement house on Meadowbrook
Avenue North in 2006. 1 sold my cabin up north to build my home here in Scandia
because I found the peace and quiet here that I had up north. I spent my life working in
the city for UPS and was excited to retire in the countryside. The rural character of this
property has been an important part of our family life. I love having my grandchildren
visit, play outside, and ride their bikes. I love going for walks down the quiet road.
love to have a bonfire on quiet nights to enjoy the beautiful outdoors. I love to sit on my
porch in the peaceful evenings. Needless to say, I was devastated and shocked to
learn about the proposed Gacek Rural Event Facility, and I am asking that the City of
Scandia deny this permit application for the following reasons:
1. This proposed event center would create a traffic and public safety scenario on
Hwy 97 would be extremely dangerous and put myself, my family, my neighbors
and anyone else traveling on Hwy 97 at a very high risk of injury or death.
2. This would be a deadly risk for all of the children that live on Meadow Brook Ave.
3. I'm requesting that a formal traffic and safety study be conducted.
4. It appears that the setback requirements do not meet codes.
5. It appears that the noise amplification distances will not meet codes.
6. This proposed event center would decrease my property value significantly so
that one individual could run a for-profit business in a zone that is specified for
agricultural purposes.
7. This proposed event center would destroy my ability to enjoy the rural character,
scenic views, open windows, nature sounds and quiet countryside that I moved
here for.
8. This applicant is already running this business. You can book a wedding
reception today at: http-Hredeemedfarm-org-1
9. The applicant's website includes information about rentable buildings for
overnight stays which is never mentioned in the application.
10. This applicant has demonstrated blatant disregard for the codes and regulations
that all others are expected/required to adhere to. The City is setting a dangerous
precedent if someone is allowed to build and launch any business they like and
then ask for a permit after the fact.
11. This applicant's existing investment in his proposed event center should not be a
consideration for approval. If the applicant failed to follow the proper process, or
the proposal does not meet the codes of the city — that is the applicant's
responsibility.
12. This proposal was met with 100% vehement opposition at the first public hearing.
There were no attendees in favor (with the exception of the applicant)
whatsoever.
13. As a resident and neighbor to the applicant, I plead with the City Council, our
Mayor and The Planning Committee to not allow one individual to destroy this
beautiful, peaceful, rural neighborhood that so many enjoy for personal profit.
Sincerely,
Gary Olson
David Hughes
AUG 12 2016
21162 Newberry Ct
CITY OF SCANDIA Scandia,Mn. 55073
651-295-9955
August 9, 2016
Scandia Planning Committe
Scandia City Council
Mayor of Scandia
Re: Gacek Rural Event Center Permit Application
As a resident who lives near the Gacek's, I am asking that the City of Scandia deny this
permit application for the following reasons:
1. The proposed event center will increase traffic and could pose public safety concerns
for the people that live in the area.
2. Will alcohol be involved? Will they serve alcohol then ask for a permit afterwards? Our
children will be in danger if cars are leaving with drivers under the influence.
3. Noise from the site will be a disturbance to our country living. Will they comply with
noise ordinances? We enjoy having our windows open for the fresh country air and
sounds.
4. I have read on the Scandia website that they are not within setback requirements. If
they are residents actually living there I would be okay with that, but not as a business
that is infringing on my rights.
5. The land is zoned for agriculture. They restored the farm with no intention of living
there. They live in White Bear Lake. Once the farm was close to being done, they decide
to ask for a permit. One does not start a business, then ask for permission from the city
after the fact.
As a resident and neighbor to the farm, I plead with the city council to not allow someone
to destroy our beautiful, peaceful rural neighborhood for their own personal profit.
Sincerely yours,
David Hughes
August 8, 2016
AUG 12 20,-
TO: Scandia Planning Committee
Scandia City Council CITY OF SCANDIA
Mayor of Scandia
FR: Jennie Ferderer
21602 Meadowbrook Ave N., Scandia, MN 55073
RE: Gacek Rural Event Center Permit Application
Hi! My name is Jennie Ferderer. My husband and I have 3 children. I am a resident of
Meadowbrook Ave North. Not only have I lived at this address for several years, but on
July 19th, 2016, 1 closed on the adjacent land to build my new home I have been saving
up years to build. This took place the day before the letter was drafted and mailed
regarding the Gacek Rural Event Facility. I was devastated and shocked to learn about
this and would not have purchased my land had I known. I have many concerns about
the proposed Gacek Rural Event Facility, and I am asking that the City of Scandia deny
this permit application for the following reasons:
One of the advantages to living on Meadowbrook is that it is a quiet street with hardly
any cars traveling it, mostly limited to the existing homeowners. My three kids are able
to ride their bikes up and down the road and walk their dogs without any concerns. It
has always been a very safe and quiet road for such activities. It would all change if a
100 -car parking lot was placed on our road. Not only the safety of the children from the
vehicles, but of the people themselves. We have no idea as to what type of people
could attend events and whether or not they themselves pose a threat to our children
and the residents of Meadowbrook.
The potential volume of traffic on Meadowbrook is alarming. What if we want to make a
quick trip to the store, or pick up our kids? We would be stuck in traffic. What if I need
to bring a child (or anyone else) to the emergency room right when an event is being let
out? There is not even close to enough room to bypass 100 cars to get through to 97
and there is only one way to exit our road. It would simply not be safe in emergency
situations.
In addition to emergencies, there is the issue of the school busses. School busses
travel up and down our road several times a day, and their route would be greatly
affected with the traffic pile up on Meadowbrook and also on Highway 97. Not to
mention the dozens of busses that would be affected that travel on 97 with the backups
related to turning onto Meadowbrook. So we are not only talking about the safety of my
children, but the safety of all the school children and bus drivers riding busses each day.
With the potential of events happening 7 days a week, I must also address the noise
from the people at the events and also sound amplification on school nights. My kids
have to get up before 6:00 each morning for school and go to bed by 8:00. Why should
we have to close all the windows to drown out the annoying noise from the event
center? With the noise and traffic disturbances, how likely is it that our family can enjoy
the outdoors like we are used to doing. Our outdoor bonfires? Our reading on the
porch? Our going for a quiet walk? It is not fair that we would not only have to view the
events from our property as they are happening, but we would not be able to have the
eace_apnd tranquility we moved here to enjoy. The events would be disruptive to the
family life we are used to enjoying in this quiet neighborhood.
I strongly urge you to think about the concerns of the public and reread the criteria listed
on page 3 of the memorandum distributed regarding the Rural Event Facility and how it
shall meet applicable standards for the IUP and AOP regarding:
***Impact of proposed use on the health, safety, and general welfare of the occupants of
surrounding lands, traffic conditions, property values, and scenic views. Our scenic
views of the landscape will now become views of people at events and cars in a parking
lot during our entire spring, summer, and fall seasons when we love to be outdoors.
This applicant has demonstrated blatant disregard for the codes and regulations that all
others are expected/required to adhere to. The City is setting a dangerous precedent if
someone is allowed to build and launch any business they like and then ask for a permit
after the fact.
As a resident and neighbor to the applicant, I plead with the City Council, our Mayor and
The Planning Committee to not allow one individual to destroy this beautiful, peaceful,
rural neighborhood that so many enjoy for personal profit.
Sincerely,
ennie Ferderer
August 8, 2016F-Rri.6yr-:
i00 vj
T0: Scandia Planning Committee AUG 2 Z�16
Scandia City Council
Mayor of Scandia CITY OF SCANDIA
FR: Julie Ruddy
21020 Meadow Brook Ave No, Scandia, MN 55073
RE: Gacek Rural Event Center Permit Application
I'm writing to plead with the City Council, our Mayor and The Planning Committee to exercise the
jurisdiction you are allowed under our codes to deny this permit so you can protect and preserve this
beautiful neighborhood and allow us to enjoy our homes in peace. Please don't let this happen to so
many neighbors that co -exist perfectly in peace, quiet and respect for each other - especially so that
one non-resident individual can make a profit. I respect everyone's right to do as they wish with their
own property — but common sense, decency and courtesy must prevail when so many people will be
adversely and negatively affected. I'm looking to my elected city officials to not allow a great
neighborhood to be destroyed. Or worse to turn Hwy 97 into a dangerous and deadly section of
highway. Most of my family lives on Meadow Brook Ave. It's dangerous now. I can't begin to imagine
what 100- cars trying to enter and exit an event all at the same time would do to the danger level.
Someone or many will be injured or die. This property is in a terrible location for this purpose. The
topography of Hwy 97 and the heavy traffic use makes it a death trap.
I just moved back to Scandia from Minneapolis to get away from traffic, noise and crowds. I work in
Minneapolis and commute a long distance so I can come home to my beautiful Scandia farm. It's
incomprehensible to me that I would have to face twice daily traffic jams for every event held at the
applicant's property. Additionally, I'm building a house and was required by the city to apply for an
interim use permit, as well as a building permit. Which I did. I never would have considered it an
option to build my house first and then ask for a permit later. In my opinion, Jeff Gacek is doing exactly
that. His business has been launched. You can book a wedding today at: 17ttp: redeemedfarm.org1. He
is not really asking for your permission. He's already in business. I think this is terribly unfair to people
Like me who follow the rules and adhere to the applicable codes. Our rules matter. It's how we will
preserve our beautiful Scandia. I am looking to you to enforce the rules and to move to deny when a
proposal simply does not make sense, creates danger, hardship on all neighbors, loss of property
values, and the destruction of a neighborhood.
As a property owner/resident who lives near the Gacek's, I am asking that the City of Scandia deny this
permit application for the following reasons:
1. This proposed event center would create a traffic and public safety scenario on Hwy 97 would
be extremely dangerous and put myself, my family, my neighbors and anyone else traveling on
Hwy 97 at a very high risk of injury or death.
2. This would be a deadly risk for all of the children that live on Meadow Brook Ave.
3. I'm requesting that a formal traffic and safety study be conducted.
4. I'm requesting that an environmental study be conducted.
5. I'm requesting that a noise and light pollution study be conducted.
6. It appears that the setback requirements do not meet codes.
7. It appears that the noise amplification distances will not meet codes.
8. It appears that the large historical barn was moved onto the property for agricultural purposes
and is now being used commercially.
9. This proposed event center would decrease my property value significantly so that one
individual could run a for-profit business in a zone that is specified for agricultural purposes.
10. This proposed event center would destroy my ability to enjoy the rural character, scenic views,
open windows, nature sounds and quiet countryside that I moved here for.
11, This applicant is already running this business. You can book a wedding reception today at:
Int 1/redeemedfarm.org/
12. The applicant's website includes information about rentable buildings for overnight stays which
is never mentioned in the application.
13. This applicant has demonstrated blatant disregard for the codes, regulations and permits that
all others are expected/required to adhere to. The City is setting a dangerous precedent if
someone is allowed to build and launch any business they like and then ask for a permit after
the fact.
14. This applicant is not a resident of Scandia, but is going to destroy the lifestyles AND endanger
the well being and safety of every resident near this proposed business.
15. This applicant's existing investment in his proposed event center should not be a consideration
for approval. If the applicant failed to follow the proper process, or the proposal does not meet
the codes of the city — that is the applicant's responsibility.
16. This proposal was met with 100°.4 vehement opposition at the first public hearing. There were
no attendees in favor (with the exception of the applicant) whatsoever.
17. As a resident and neighbor to the (non-resident) applicant, I plead with the City Council, our
Mayor and The Planning Committee to not allow one Individual to destroy this beautiful,
peaceful, rural neighborhood that so many enjoy for personal profit.
Sincerely,
August 8, 2016
TO: Scandia Planning Committee
Scandia City Council
Mayor of Scandia
FR: Maryetta M Lane
20960 Meadowbrook Ave
RE: Gacek Rural Event Center Permit Application
RECEIVED
AUG 1 2 til +o
CITY OF SCANDIA
As a property owner/resident who lives near the Gacek's, I am asking that the City of Scandia
deny this permit application for the following reasons:
1. This proposed event center would create a traffic and public safety scenario on Hwy 97
would be extremely dangerous and put myself, my family, my neighbors and anyone else
traveling on Hwy 97 at a very high risk of injury or death.
2. This would be a deadly risk for all of the children that live on Meadow Brook Ave.
3. I'm requesting that a formal traffic and safety study be conducted.
4. I'm requesting that an environmental study be conducted.
5. I'm requesting that a noise and light pollution study be conducted.
6. It appears that the setback requirements do not meet codes.
7. It appears that the noise amplification distances will not meet codes.
8. It appears that the large historical barn was moved onto the property without a permit.
9. This proposed event center would decrease my property value significantly so that one
individual could run a for-profit business in a zone that is speed for agricultural
purposes.
10. This proposed event center would destroy my ability to enjoy the rural character, scenic
views, open windows, nature sounds and quiet countryside that I moved here for.
11. This applicant is already running this business. You can book a wedding reception today
at: http://redeemedfarm.ora/
12. The applicant's website includes information about rentable buildings for overnight stays
which is never mentioned in the application.
13. This applicant has demonstrated blatant disregard for the codes and regulations that all
others are expected/required to adhere to. The City is setting a dangerous precedent if
someone is allowed to build and launch any business they like and then ask for a permit
after the fact.
14. This applicant is not a resident of Scandia.
15. This applicant's existing investment in his proposed event center should not be a
consideration for approval. If the applicant failed to follow the proper process, or the
proposal does not meet the codes of the city — that is the applicant's responsibility.
16. This proposal was met with 100% vehement opposition at the first public hearing. There
were no attendees in favor (with the exception of the applicant) whatsoever.
17. As a resident and neighbor to the applicant, I plead with the City Council, our Mayor and
The Planning Committee to not allow one individual to destroy this beautiful, peaceful,
rural neighborhood that so many enjoy for personal profit.
18. We moved here in 2004 Iooldng for a country feel and quietness from Little Canada of 33
years, hoping our new community would remain as is with agriculture and no commerical
business.
Sincerely,
August 8, 2016
AUG 11 20-;d
TO: Scandia Planning Committee
CITY OF SCANDIA
Scandia City Council
Mayor of Scandia
FR: Maggie Olson
21602 Meadowbrook Ave N., Scandia, MN 55073
RE: Gacek Rural Event Center Permit Application
Hi! My name is Maggie Olson. My husband and I built our retirement house on
Meadowbrook Avenue North in 2006. 1 sold my cabin up north to build my home here in
Scandia because I found the peace and quiet here that I had up north. The rural
character of this property has been an important part of our family life. I love having my
grandchildren visit, play outside, and ride their bikes. I love going for walks down the
quiet road. I love to have a bonfire on quiet nights to enjoy the beautiful outdoors.
love to read on my porch in the peaceful evenings. Needless to say, I was devastated
and shocked to learn about the proposed Gacek Rural Event Facility, and I am asking
that the City of Scandia deny this permit application for the following reasons:
1. This proposed event center would create a traffic and public safety scenario on
Hwy 97 would be extremely dangerous and put myself, my family, my neighbors
and anyone else traveling on Hwy 97 at a very high risk of injury or death.
2. This would be a deadly risk for all of the children that live on Meadow Brook Ave.
3. I'm requesting that a formal traffic and safety study be conducted.
4. It appears that the setback requirements do not meet codes.
5. It appears that the noise amplification distances will not meet codes.
6. This proposed event center would decrease my property value significantly so
that one individual could run a for-profit business in a zone that is specified for
agricultural purposes.
7. This proposed event center would destroy my ability to enjoy the rural character,
scenic views, open windows, nature sounds and quiet countryside that I moved
here for.
8. This applicant is already running this business. You can book a wedding
reception today at: http://redeemedfariii,org/
9. The applicant's website includes information about rentable buildings for
overnight stays which is never mentioned in the application.
10. This applicant has demonstrated blatant disregard for the codes and regulations
that all others are expected/required to adhere to. The City is setting a dangerous
precedent if someone is allowed to build and launch any business they like and
then ask for a permit after the fact.
11. This applicant's existing investment in his proposed event center should not be a
consideration for approval. If the applicant failed to follow the proper process, or
the proposal does not meet the codes of the city — that is the applicant's
responsibility.
12. This proposal was met with 100% vehement opposition at the first public hearing.
There were no attendees in favor (with the exception of the applicant)
whatsoever.
13. As a resident and neighbor to the applicant, I plead with the City Council, our
Mayor and The Planning Committee to not allow one individual to destroy this
beautiful, peaceful, rural neighborhood that so many enjoy for personal profit.
Sincerely,
a`'4"
(9tooe"s
Maggie Olson
August 8, 2016 RECEIVED
T0: Scandia Planning Committee AUG 1 b 201b
Scandia City Council
Mayor of Scandia CITY OF SCANDIA
FR: Mary Kay Ruddy (resident since 1976)
21020 Meadow Brook Ave No, Scandia, MN 55073
RE: Gacek Rural Event Center Permit Application
As a property owner/resident who lives near the Gacek's, I am asking that the City of Scandia deny this
permit application for the following reasons:
1. This proposed event center would create a traffic and public safety scenario on Hwy 97 would
be extremely dangerous and put myself, my family, my neighbors and anyone else traveling on
Hwy 97 at a very high risk of injury or death.
2. This would be a deadly risk for all of the children that live on Meadow Brook Ave.
3. I'm requesting that a formal traffic and safety study be conducted.
4. I'm requesting that an environmental study be conducted.
5. I'm requesting that a noise and light pollution study be conducted.
6. It appears that the setback requirements do not meet codes.
7. It appears that the noise amplification distances will not meet codes.
8. It appears that the large historical barn was moved onto the property without a permit.
9. This, proposed event center would decrease my property value significantly so that one
individual could run a for-profit business in a zone that is specified for agricultural purposes.
10. This proposed event center would destroy my ability to enjoy the rural character, scenic views,
open windows, nature sounds and quiet countryside that I moved here for.
11. This applicant is already running this business. You can book a wedding reception today at:
hap_/fredeemedfarm.org/
12. The applicant's website includes information about rentable buildings for overnight stays which
is never mentioned in the application.
13. This applicant has demonstrated blatant disregard for the codes and regulations that all others
are expected/required to adhere to. The City is setting a dangerous precedent if someone is
allowed to build and launch any business they like and then ask for a permit after the fact.
14. This applicant is not a resident of Scandia.
15. This applicant's existing investment in his proposed event center should not be a consideration
for approval. If the applicant failed to follow the proper process, or the proposal does not meet
the codes of the city — that is the applicant's responsibility.
16. This proposal was met with 100% vehement opposition at the first public hearing. There were
no attendees in favor (with the exception of the applicant) whatsoever.
17. As a resident and neighbor to the applicant, I plead with the City Council, our Mayor and The
Planning Committee to not allow one individual to destroy this beautiful, peaceful, rural
neighborhood that so many enjoy for personal profit.
Sincerely,%
RECEIVED
AUG 3 0 2016
CITY OF SCANDIA
T0: Skandia Planning Committee
Scandia City Council
Mayor of Scandia
FR: C Gj u v
C) K --C) A) l4 A U, C11) /t/11V
RE: Gacek Rural Event Center Permit Application
s S—b 7 3"
As a property owner who lives near the Gacek's, I am asking that the City of Scandia deny this permit
application for the following reasons:
1. This proposed event center would create a traffic and public safety scenario on Hwy 97 would
be extremely dangerous and put myself, my family, my neighbors and anyone else traveling on
Hwy 97 at a very high risk of injury or death.
2. This would be a deadly risk for all of the children that live on Meadow Brook Ave.
3. I'm requesting that a formal traffic and safety study be conducted.
4. It appears that the setback requirements do not meet codes.
5. It appears that the noise amplification distances will not meet codes.
6. This proposed event center would decrease my property value significantly so that one
individual could run a for-profit business in a zone that is specified for agricultural purposes.
7. This proposed event center would destroy my ability to enjoy the rural character, scenic views,
open windows, nature sounds and quiet countryside that I moved here for.
8. This applicant is already running this business. You can book a wedding reception today at:
httn:l redeemedfarm.or
9. The applicant's website includes information about rentable buildings for overnight stays which
is never mentioned in the application.
10. This applicant has demonstrated blatant disregard for the codes and regulations that all others
are expected/required to adhere to. The City is setting a dangerous precedent if someone is
allowed to build and launch any business they like and then ask for a permit after the fact.
11. This applicant's existing investment in his proposed event center should not be a consideration
for approval. If the applicant failed to follow the proper process, or the proposal does not meet
the codes of the city — that is the applicant's responsibility.
12. This proposal was met with 100% vehement opposition at the first public hearing. There were
no attendees in favor (witty the exception of the applicant) whatsoever.
13. As a resident and neighbor to the applicant, I plead with the City Council, our Mayor and The
Planning Committee to not allow one individual to destroy this beautiful, peaceful, rural
neighborhood that so many enjoy for personal profit.
Sincerely,
c'�,Z
"-�111 �®
August 8, 2016`
_
TO: Scandia Planning Committee AUG i ' 2011.6
Scandia City Council CIN OF SCANDIA
Mayor of Scandia
FR: Oscar W Lane
20960 Meadowbrook Ave
RE: Gacek Rural Event Center Permit Application
As a property owner/resident who lives near the Gacek's, I am asking that the City of Scandia
deny this permit application for the following reasons:
1. This proposed event center would create a traffic and public safety scenario on Hwy 97
would be extremely dangerous and put myself, my family, my neighbors and anyone else
traveling on Hwy 97 at a very high risk of injury or death.
2. This would be a deadly risk for all of the children that live on Meadow Brook Ave.
3. I'm requesting that a formal traffic and safety study be conducted.
4. I'm requesting that an environmental study be conducted.
5. I'm requesting that a noise and light pollution study be conducted.
6. It appears that the setback requirements do not meet codes.
7. It appears that the noise amplification distances will not meet codes.
8. It appears that the large historical barn was moved onto the property without a permit.
9. This proposed event center would decrease my property value significantly so that one
individual could run a for-profit business in a zone that is speed for agricultural
purposes.
10. This proposed event center would destroy my ability to enjoy the rural character, scenic
views, open windows, nature sounds and quiet countryside that I moved here for.
11. This applicant is already running this business. You can book a wedding reception today
at: hltp://redeemedfarm.org/
12. The applicant's website includes information about rentable buildings for overnight stays
which is never mentioned in the application.
13. This applicant has demonstrated blatant disregard for the codes and regulations that all
others are expected/required to adhere to. The City is setting a dangerous precedent if
someone is allowed to build and launch any business they like and then ask for a permit
after the fact.
14. This applicant is not a resident of Scandia.
15. This applicant's existing investment in his proposed event center should not be a
consideration for approval. If the applicant failed to follow the proper process, or the
proposal does not meet the codes of the city — that is the applicant's responsibility.
16. This proposal was met with 100% vehement opposition at the first public hearing. There
were no attendees in favor (with the exception of the applicant) whatsoever.
17. As a resident and neighbor to the applicant, I plead with the City Council, our Mayor and
The Planning Committee to not allow one individual to destroy this beautiful, peaceful,
rural neighborhood that so many enjoy for personal profit.
18. We moved here in 2004 looking for a country feel and quietness from Little Canada of 33
years, hoping our new community would remain as is with agriculture and no commerical
business.
Sincerely,
August 17, 2016
Scandia Planning Commission
Mayor of Scandia
Scandia City Council
RE: Gacek Rural Event Center Permit Application
Dear Elected and Appointed Officials:
SEP a ZOIn
.' In
As a property owner who lives near the Gacek property, I am asking that the City of Scandia
deny the permit application for an Interim Use Permit for the following reasons:
1. The applicant's existing investment cannot be a consideration in this application.
Investments are not a consideration pursuant to City Code or Minnesota State Statute
when a Commission or Council is reviewing an application. The applicant in this instance
ailed to follow the requiredprocess; any financial consequences of that are not the fault
of the City; the responsibility lies solely on the applicant.
2. The proposed event center would create a traffic and public safety issue on Highway 97
due to the increase in traffic which would put myself and other members of the
community at risk for injury, up to and including death.
3. The proposed event center would create a traffic and public safety issue on
Meadowbrook due to the increase in traffic which would put myself and other
members of the community at risk for injury, up to and including death. The increased
traffic would be extremely dangerous for all the children who live on Meadow Brook;
4. It appears that the setback requirements so not conform with the current code
requirements;
5. It appears that the noise amplification distances will not meet code requirements;
6. The applicant moved forward with the event center project prior to obtaining any
permits or approval from the City of Scandia.
7. The applicant has already started booking events without the proper permits or
approval. See their website at littp.//redeemerfarm.org
8. The applicant's website includes information about rentable buildings for overnights
stays which is not mentioned in the application;
9. The applicant has displayed a blatant disregard for the City of Scandia Codes and
regulations by moving forward with the event center before requesting any permits or
approval. This sets a dangerous precedent for the City and will tell others that permits
may be obtained after the fact with no ramifications;
10. This proposal was met with 100% opposition at the first public hearing. There were no
attendees in favor of this application aside from the applicants;
As a resident of Scandia living in close proximity to the proposed event center, I implore you to
deny this application. I especially have concerns as I walk daily on Meadowbrook with my dog;
the road poses enough dangers as it is. Adding substantial amounts of traffic, especially on
weekends when more local residents are out and about enjoying our area, will only increase
those dangers. Approving this IUP will be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare
There is clearly not adequate parking in the area to support such a business; although the
Planner has included a condition that no parking be allowed on public streets, that is the only
location where parking would occur. The Engineer made it clear in the application comments
that there are impervious surface issues and soil and drainage issues which impact the
applicant's ability to allow for proper parking.
Please take into consideration these issues when reviewing this application.
Sincerely, �0,44 Aaz4—,V
Mark Paul
21154 Newberry Court
Scandia, MN 55073
(651) 238-6299
RECEIVED
August 18, 2016 AUG 2 2 2016
To: City of Scandia Mayor
City of Scandia City Council CITY OF SCANDIA
City of Scandia Planning Committee
From: Curt & Patty Peterson
Subject: Interim Use Permit (IUP) for Jeff and Julie Gacek
My name is Curt Peterson. I live just north of the Gacek property at 21617 Meadowbrook Drive
N. Patty and I formerly lived in White Bear Lake at 3441 Glen Oaks Ave... While we loved our
quiet, peaceful White Bear neighborhood we longed to someday live in the country and have our
own tranquil space to grow our own produce and someday have a few livestock. My wife Patty
and I looked for a new place to call home for over 4 yews before deciding to purchase our
Scandia property. We looked for a property that was not adjacent to high voltage power lines,
railroads, highways, brown sites, junk yards or pipelines. We looked for property that had space,
peace and a quiet natural setting. We looked for a place to call home and slowly develop a small
rural farm. When we first purchased our property in the fall of 2012 the junk, weeds, grass and
trees were so overwhelming and unmanaged that we really didn't have an accurate assessment of
the property. Once we started working on clearing junk and undesirable vegetation from the land
it was evident that the property was a literal dumping ground. I don't think the former owners
(the Forsell's) ever threw anything away or cared for the property for a long, long time. Many
things were left right where they failed or broke. So far we have removed over 370 tures, 67
appliances, 3 old buildings, countless bins of glass and 5 large dumpsters of steel. Most of this
was done with a wheelbarrow, pick and shovel. Needless to say, we have placed a great deal of
time and effort into attempting to revive this potentially beautiful property. Our labor of love
held great promise that someday we could enjoy beautiful mature trees, gardens and bountiful
crops, all while enjoying a quiet peaceful setting teaming with buds and other natural wildlife.
All our dreams, hard work and ambitions are now on hold with the proposed Gacek rural event
center. Patty and I have more concerns and questions than answers concerning the event center.
Here are some of our comments and issues concerning this proposal:
1) I feel scammed. When Jeff first purchased his property he stated that he plans to
revitalize the farm and live there. Over the last few years Jeff has approached Patty and I
a number of times to purchase our barn and or some of our land. He always maintained
that he really wanted to improve his property so he could move in and live there. This is
the reason why I and many other gracious neighbors allowed the Gacek's to move the
former Johnson Brothers barn through their farm fields. If I had known that this Barn
would be used strictly for a commercial business that will have a negative effect on our
properties I would have refused.
2) A rural event center in this particular area seems like a square peg in a round hole. A
non -fit to the surrounding area and even a bit of spot zoning. If I were to pick and area
for weddings and receptions and large gatherings it would be in a urban area where you
have lots of surrounding commercial property or in a very urban area where you have
hundreds if not thousands of acres so that traffic, noise and or loitering may not be a
disturbance or nuisance to the neighborhood.
3) Meadowbrook Ave N is only a 17.5 foot road (near our home) with no shoulders. It is
not designed to support higher volume traffic and especially commercial traffic. Two
regular cars have a hard time passing each other. Two cars plus anything else like a
pedestrian, bicyclist or roller bladder would be a potential accident.
4) Highway 97 can support a higher volume of traffic and seems to be the best solution for
ingress/egress to the facility. However, the curve and hill combination on Highway 97
just west of Meadowbrook Ave N creates a blind approach as you travel eastbound.
There is no room to create a bypass lane due to Meadowbrook Ave south of Hwy 97. I
could see this being the site of many horrific accidents if you have a number of cars
backed up on 97 waiting to take a left onto Meadowbrook Ave N.
5) Sight Sound issues. From my house I can see directly to the Gacek property. I can see
his outdoor shelter, barn and other outbuildings. A few weeks ago I could hear music and
see bright lighting from inside my house. I believe Jeff was having a party for guests that
evening. This happened just once so far. I can't imagine this happening every day or
even every weekend. This would be a definite nuisance.
6) The rural event facility seems like it could be open for business 7 days a week. That
includes every weekend. Would you like a full blown wedding with the decorated cars,
horns, limousines, balloons, confetti, bands, music, dancing, yelling, drinking (alcohol)
and loitering going on at your neighbor's house every weekend? Patty and I cherish our
weekends as we both work more than full time. Isn't home about quiet, peace and
tranquility? I hope so.
7) I believe Jeff Gasek did not carefully plan, disclose or meet with the City to confirm his
project met requirements before he started his quest to develop a commercial venture on
his agricultural property. It was a "build it and they will come" scenario. I don't think the
City or the neighbors could grant pity for any hardship since the plan was not properly
disclosed.
8) It appears the purpose of the Core AG district is to protect and reserve long term
agricultural production and to preserve the rural character of the City. A rural event
facility does not accomplish any of these purposes. A rural event facility would extend
Core Ag into a much higher or greater commercial use category; it would be a
commercial business not rural Agricultural production.
9) I am looking at a document published on the City of Scandia website titled "City of
Scandia Allowable Land Uses". URL:
htt ://www.ei.scandia.irui-us/vertical/sites/°/`7B2FID9A41-1D4D-4195-A3E4-
159328E3F399%7D/uploads/°/o7B 1953EAD 1-CB8C-46E 1-AA6C-
627331CF92DA%7D.PDF I don't see "Rural Event Facility" listed as an allowable use.
This type of facility does not conform to the zoning regulation of the City. In fact, almost
all commercial uses are completely blank for the Core Ag district. They are not allowed
by Interim Use Permit (IUP) or Conditional Use Permit (CUP).
10) The rural event facility will be a nuisance and stressor to the existing neighborhood for
both people and livestock. It will create more noise, lighting, traffic, congestion and
loitering.
11) The rural event center will lower surrounding property because it creates an intensive
use, noise, traffic and disturbance in a quiet, peaceful residential setting.
12) The rural event facility will create traffic hazards and more congestion to the existing
neighborhood.
13) Where will the parking lot and adequate screening be situated?
14) It seems that before that IUP has been granted the Gacek's have already started their
commercial business. Please see URL: htto://redeemedfarm.orp/contact/
15) To give you an idea about how open and disruptive a rural event center would be to Patty
and me, I have included a picture taken from our home as Exhibit A. As you can see
there are no sound or visual protections from the proposed rural event facility.
In summary, Patty and I picked this area to relocate because of how Scandia was preserved in a
rural country setting. This property is an example of how a forced non -conforming business
could move in and Scandia would lose its integrity and rural peaceful character of why we all
live here! I do not want Scandia to become another area that does not value its heritage. I
would like to reinforce that this site is a poor place to situate this type of business. I strongly feel
that this belongs in a highly urban or completely rural setting with far less population. I don't
know too many people who would want a wedding and or large event every weekend right next
to their home. This seems utterly absurd and lends no credence to the peace, quiet and
tranquility that we should call home. This should not be even considered.
Thanks for your time and consideration.
Sincerely, Curtis & Patty Peterson
21617 Meadowbrook Ave N
Scandia, MN 55073
Phone: 651-329-1941
Email: ; urtis.peterson7 (@,msn.com
Exhibit A
Picture taken on 8/17/2016 looking southerly from the Peterson home at 21617 Meadowbrook
Ave N. Scandia MN 55073. Notice how wide open the view is with no screening for viewing,
lighting or sound.
August 15, 2016 RECEIVED
TO: Scandia Planning Committee AUG 1 b 201b
Scandia City Council
Mayor of Scandia CITY OF SCANDIA
FR: Scott Sample
RE: Gacek Rural Event Center Permit Application
I live at 21508 Meadow Brook Ave No. - which is on the narrow dead end north of Hwy 97. And I have
for almost 30 years. I have several concerns with the proposed IUP the Gacek's are applying for.
First of all, I'm wondering why Jeff (Gacek) was allowed to develop the property under the disguise of
agricultural use. The property did not meet the acreage requirements. And none of the buildings are
used to house livestock, crops or farming equipment — which is the intent of agricultural use. The little
crops that are grown on the premises are farmed by others. To me this is a separate issue than the IUP
they are applying for, but speaks to the deceit that may follow the permit.
Second, I am wondering why the IUP even made it past the City Planner and was brought to the
Planning Board — as it clearly did not meet several of the requirements:
• Inadequate setbacks
• Amplified noise request within 1000 feet of other homes
• Little to no scenery. screening for neighbors
• Exceeding possible hardscape limits
• Overnight lodging
• No studies to show impact on traffic, noise pollution, light pollution, or the impact on the
environment
• And many other unanswered questions, such as: alcohol use, enforcement of ordinances, time
frame for IUP expiration
To me the burden should be on the applicant to show that all requirements are 100% met, and that
studies have been done by either the applicant or city to show us the facts on the impact to the
neighborhood.
My third concern is the request to put a parking lot onsite that would be accessed from Meadow Brook,
Meadow Brook is a dead end road with no cul de sac and is only 18' wide with no shoulder — it is
considerably narrower than Meadow Brook to the south. It was built for three residents that used the
road at that time. Now we have several residents on the road with school buses, garbage trucks and
tractors that already make it tough to pass and unsafe for an evening stroll, Adding 100 cars or more
would be a disaster. Also I can say from first hand experience that every time I have to sit on Hwy 97
waiting to take a left, I cringe as the traffic comes over the hill from the west at 55mph or faster and
realizes that there is no bypass lane and they screech to a stop. If there were more than a couple of
cars backed up to turn left onto Meadow Brook, the traffic coming over the hill would not have time to
stop and there would be a messy accident. At the August Planning Board meeting, Jeff was asked to do
a traffic study. I suggest the city does their own, or strongly/thoroughly vets the information that Jeff is
giving them - as he has shown deceit in the past.
Fourth, I see no need for Scandia to bring a for-profit business into our quiet neighborhood. This is not
a Scandia resident. He has no intention of using it for his primary residence. He only plans to bring
people up from the city to enjoy a Few hours of our lifestyle and Leave ... only to leave behind a long-
lasting negative impact on the people who live here every day.
Lastly, I would like to say that the best part of living in the rural Scandia area, even above the peaceful
sounds, quiet nights and frankly, the lack of drama are the neighbors and the neighborhood in general,
Everyone gets along. We don't need privacy walls, we are respectful of each other. We help each other
and watch out for one another. The last thing we need is a business plopped right in the middle of it
all under hostile circumstances. I don't believe if this IUP is allowed that everyone will just go back in
their house and say, "Oh well, I tried and I guess I will go back to being happy." What I believe will
happen is that the neighborhood will be full of drama for some time — traffic accidents, 911 calls,
sirens and just general hostility towards the event venue.
In summary, I highly urge you all to consider the lifestyle of an entire neighborhood over the wishes of
one and deny the IUP permit or the event center the Gacek's are proposing. If you choose to allow this
IUP, I have only one request — that you postpone the issue of the permit for one year so I have a
chance to sell and move before my property declines in value.
Sincerely, Scott Sample
Brenda Eklund
From: Mayor Randall Simonson <r.simonson@ci.scandia.mn.us>
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2016 3:49 PM
To: Brenda Eklund ; 'Neil Soltis'
Subject: FW: Gacek Rural Event Center Permit Application (Scandia, MN)
FYI
From: Randy Schmidt[mailto:randyschmidt2@amail.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2016 11:36
To: r.simonson(a)ci.scandia.mn.us
Subject: Gacek Rural Event Center Permit Application (Scandia, MN)
Dear Mayor Simonson,
I am writing in response to a recent Scandia, MN City Hall meeting, with a large turnout of concerned residents
re: the above permit applied for. The local public is strongly opposed to this permit. In support of this
opposition, I am asking that this permit be denied due to several issues this event center will create including:
Noise. I live directly across the highway from this proposed parking lot and event facility, and can attest to the
amplification of sound across the open wetland fields, especially at night. This facility is not in a remote
isolated location, unlike other rural event centers that are isolated by both distance and woodlands that buffer
noise. This particular area has a growing number residential homes coming in, and the event center will
create noise disturbances in this flat, open area from traffic including motorcycles (and late at night), music,
and PA systems. Residents will have to keep windows shut, and this will only minimize the noise. This
problem will be exacerbated by any alcohol present, whether served by the event facility or brought in by the
guests.
Traffic issues. Multiple vehicles coming or leaving the facility on the side street off the highway (97) will create
increased danger. Highway 97 is a 55 MPH highway, and the small side street access cannot safely
accommodate a large number of vehicles at one time for business activity. Even with traffic control, this will
significantly jam the traffic flow on highway 97 creating delays and hazards. Local area residents will also have
difficulty in this traffic which will be similar to a construction zone when events occur at this facility.
Property values. Prospective home buyers always inquire about the neighborhood, including any local
concerns, i.e. ambulance facilities, fires stations, bar activity, and any deterrents to a peaceful
environment. This event center will most certainly be a concern and will decrease residential property values
for all within miles of the event facility. The continued progress of residential properties in this area is
advantageous to the development and economic growth of the community, and also beneficial to local
businesses in the City of Scandia.
Sincerely,
Randal Schmidt
21017 Meadowbrook Circle N
Scandia, MN 55073
651-728-2526
TO: Scandia Planning Committee
Scandia City Council
Mayor of Scandia
FR: Erin Snicale
21097 Meadowbrook Cir N
Scandia, MN 55073
RE: Gacek Rural Event Center IUP and AOP Application
12680 Scandia Trail
Scandia, MN 55073
Proj. No: 16022.015
August 16, 2016
RECEIVED
AUG 10 2016
CITY OF SCANDIA
In April of this year, my husband and I sold our home in Crystal, MN and purchased a beautiful
home in Scandia. We both grew up in the country and both longed to return to quiet, rural life.
We invested a lot of time and effort in selecting our new community and were thrilled to find the
home that we did. The City of Scandia is quiet, charming, welcoming, and has proven to be that
little bit of heaven that my husband and I have been dreaming of owning for quite some time.
Recently, we learned Jeff and Julie Gacek, owners of the property at 12680 Scandia Trail (right
across the Highway 97 and completely visible from our new home) have applied for an IUP and
AOP for a rural event center, designed to accommodate wedding receptions, ceremonies,
Sunday worship, retreats, and various other events. This proposal was met with 100%
vehement opposition at the first public hearing. There were no attendees in favor (with the
exception of the applicant) whatsoever.
As a concerned property owner that lives very near the Gacek's, we are asking that the City of
Scandia deny the above mentioned permit application for a rural event center for the following
reasons:
1. This applicant is already running this business. You can book a wedding
reception today at: http://redeetnedfarm.org/
2. The applicant's website includes information about rentable buildings for overnight stays
which is never mentioned in the application.
3. This applicant has demonstrated blatant disregard for the codes and regulations that all
others are expected/required to adhere to. The City is setting a dangerous precedent if
someone is allowed to build and launch any business they like and then ask for a permit
after the fact.
4. This applicant is not a resident of Scandia.
5. It appears that the large historical barn was moved onto the property without a permit.
6. The setbacks of the buildings on the property and the proposed parking lot do not meet
the minimum setback requirements by a large margin.
7. This proposed event center would decrease my property value significantly so that one
individual could run a for-profit business in a zone that is specified for agricultural
purposes.
8. This event center would be open for business seven days a week, with events ending at
10:00 pm. Guests would need to leave the event center by 10:30 pm. Alcohol will be
allowed to be served by licensed vendors brought in by clients. There is major concern
regarding intoxicated drivers, intoxicated event guests wandering into neighboring
properties, and guests staying well past the hour of 10:30.
9. The proposed parking lot for events would hold up to 100 cars (the ordinance allows up
to 300 guests per event). This parking lot size rivals the largest parking lot in the city of
Scandia; which is the Community Center.
a. The proposed parking lot would be entered from Meadowbrook Ave. N. This road
is very narrow with no shoulders. Increasing the traffic on this small country road
by 100 cars or more is inviting certain disaster.
10. This proposed event center would create a traffic and public safety scenario on Hwy 97
would be extremely dangerous and put myself, my family, my neighbors and anyone
else traveling on Hwy 97 at a very high risk of injury or death.
a. This would be a deadly risk for all of the children that live on Meadowbrook Ave.
1. I'm requesting that a formal traffic and safety study be conducted.
11. The applicants are proposing outdoor amplified sound for ceremonies, indoor amplified
sound for receptions and worship, and outdoor lighting.
a. At the hearing, there was discussion over the decibels allowed by the city's
ordinance, and it sounded like the Gacek's did not currently meet the allowance.
However, the Gacek's have not submitted any formal plan for sound
amplification, decibels, etc.
b. The Gacek's have also not submitted a plan for outdoor lighting. Outdoor lighting
will certainly cause a disruption to the quiet peaceful nights we all enjoy. Outdoor
amplified sound at any time of day will definitely cause us all to have to keep our
windows closed on beautiful Minnesota Spring, Summer, and Fall days- which is
not what we moved to the country for.
1. I'm requesting that an environmental study be conducted.
2. I'm requesting that a noise and light pollution study be conducted.
12. The Gacek's application also includes that they do not intend install septic systems to
accommodate extra indoor restroom facilities so they are planning to provide portable
toilets to event guests. Our home boasts a large deck that overlooks our backyard,
which also gives us a direct view to the Gacek's property. We are not thrilled about the
prospect of spending a beautiful evening on our deck grilling our dinner, only to enjoy the
sight of a row of plastic restrooms.
This applicant's existing investment in their proposed event center should not be a
consideration for approval. If the applicant failed to follow the proper process, or the proposal
does not meet the codes of the city — that is the applicant's responsibility.
I firmly believe that with the above listed concerns as well as the concerns brought forth by other
neighbors listed below that the planning commission must deny this permit.
Thank you so much for taking the time to read this letter. I implore you to carefully consider the
impact that allowing the Gacek's to continue in their plan would have on our beautiful
community.
Sincerely,1� - 9��—ISA
f
Erin and Jon Snicale
RECEIVED
SLE- i' 291016
To members of the City Planning Commission: CITY OF SCANDIA_
I am writing to request that you turn down the application for the Gasek Event Center due to the
public health risks of this Center to citizens of Scandia. As a physician and scientist and
property owner, I deeply believe the proposed Center will be a significant public health threat to
our community.
I am one of the owners of Scandia Meadowbrook Farm,a 131 acre farm at the North end of
Meadowbrook. I am also a homeowner in Scandia 23601 Quentin Ave N. There are many
reasons why I strongly oppose this Center related to that fact that it will disrupt the peace,
tranquility, and beauty of the environment of the neighborhood. However, above all else it will
be an immediate and direct threat to public health.
The proposed event Center will bring large volumes of traffic to a section of the Route 97 which
will significantly increase the risk of bodily injury and death to those who currently use the roads
in that vicinity. In the ten plus years since my family bought our house on Quentin Ave there
have already been two highway deaths on Rt 95 and another on Rt 97 this past summer in Forest
Lake. Three too many!
The Gasek proposal shamefully lacks ANY safety studies related to the potential for more
deaths. We know that traffic volume at very high speeds on Rt 97 will increase markedly during
the proposed events. Combine this with alcohol, without any policing or regulating, is throwing
fuel onto an already hot fire. There have been no traffic studies, no safety studies, no plans to
limit alcohol use, no plans to police traffic or alcohol. This is a public health threat and it is the
responsibility of your Commission to say no. A green light to this Center from the Commission
will undoubtedly result in the eventual harm to one or more citizens of Scandia. The very reason
our Planning Commissions exist is to govern this kind of dangerous proposals. We have to
remember the Center is on agricultural land in the middle of an otherwise peaceful rural setting.
While zoning regulations are intended to serve many purposes, first and foremost is the safety of
our community. What is more important than the safety of our community - an event center??
Based upon the health and safety risks to our Scandia community I urge you to reject the Gasek
proposal. It is a disaster waiting to happen.
Sincerely,
Keith Lurie MD
612 986 3917
kei llf Iii r°ie!(-Pi cloud.coin
October 1, 2016
Scandia Planning Committee
Scandia City Council
Mayor of Scandia
Re: Gacek Rural Event Center
RECEIVED
OCT -32011
CITY OF SCANDIA
As long time property owners (30 years) who live near the Gacek's, we are
asking that the permit application be denied.
This event center will create a dangerous traffic situation with vehicles
coming from the west making a left hand turn into the center. We are also
concerned with the noise level, with the fact that alcohol will be served and
the potential loss of property values.
Please do not let this event center ruin Scandia's rural community setting.
We plead that you not allow one individual that does not even live in Scandia,
and we doubt has any plans to do so, ruin our rural community.
Unfortunately, it appears the Gacek's have been deceitful throughout this
process and we do not feel that they should be allowed to dictate what
happens in the Scandia community.
Sincerely
Michae and Gayle Fiefarek
13340 Scandia Trail N
Members of the Planning Commission:
As a long time Scandia resident and the owner of the largest developable parcel on
Meadowbrook (131 acres) north of the proposed use, with sole access off of Meadowbrook, we
remain very concerned about the proposal. This use is not compatible with the area, its
roadways and current and prospective uses and, most importantly, the ordinance itself.
We believe when the inevitable redevelopment occurs on our parcel with higher value homes,
this will both be a nuisance and also will greatly impede our marketability and ability to obtain
financing. The staff report and the application gives no analysis to the comprehensive plan and
the concepts on which our City has consistently based its planning—maintenance of the rural
character and orderly development of the area as a low density, higher quality residential
community. Ironic given our parallel discussions on the aging of the Scandia population and
decline of school attendance.
First, the ordinance. This use is allowed ONLY as an accessory use to an agricultural use in our
district. That is not what is happening here. This is clearly a development of an event centera
very high intensity use, suitable only for our town center. The ordinance requires what the
author of the ordinance indicated in an earlier PC comment: this use was intended as an adjunct
to a working farm, as an "Interim" use (for a short timeframe while the farm was actively used)
to help keep family farming viable in Scandia. Instead, we have the movement of buildings to
the site, construction of a large surface parking area, intended uses that are very large in scale
with large catering suppliers, liquor, amplified music, potentially unruly crowds, etc. Further the
total disregard of this developer for our community and its standards has been shown by the fact
he is also using the premises for hotel purposes already and did all this construction work
without any prior City land use approvals. This was at his own risk. AND the owners have
never used the premises for any material other uses. Even if there were occasion residential use
of the site in the future by the owner or incidental farming of a small area, this would not meet
the test. Accessory is defined as a minor use when all utilization of a property is taken into
account. The use here, given the small parcel size and intensity of the event use, clearly makes
the event use—basically akin to a restaurant or a regular event center like dozens in the region
the primary use. The intent here was clearly from the start to hold larger events and to
artificially create a farm -like atmosphere to attract such uses. The bottom line is that this will
function much more like a restaurant and bar or a large event venue vs. an accessory, incidental
or minor use, adjunct to a use (rural agriculture) we want to preserve.
Second, the information in the application remains incomplete. Particularly regarding the traffic,
the information is incomplete and inaccurate. Our City engineer notes that using the MN DOT
standard for this type of intersection and use, a left turn lane is warranted. The traffic report fails
to accurately analyze the traffic issues and fails to fairly and fully report to the PC and City on
this standard and the appropriateness of requirement of a turning lane on 97. Based on the
report and the City traffic engineers comment, a turn lane should be required at applicant's cost,
if the proposal is approved.
More importantly, the report focuses entirely on 97 and the entry turn movement. That is not the
primary issue for the current residents or future development. That issue is the interruption of
traffic movement in or out from Meadowbrook during entry and exiting of events. On entry,
imagine trying to turn East when there is a line of left turning entering cars for the event, or
coming home and waiting for a long time to make the left turn onto the rural road you live
on. And imagine the logjam when one left turning exiting car is waiting to turn East onto 97,
with a line of cars waiting to turn right on Meadowbrook. These movements, when traffic
arrives and departs in a large cluster has zero analysis in the traffic study. Similarly the problem
of trying to leave Meadowbrook from the South to go West during the arrival times. Yet these
are the meaningful measures of compatibility to the present and future Meadowbrook residential
uses. This analysis must be done before any use can be approved.
There is also no analysis of the risk factor of the road crest to the West. Simply a bland
statement that use of Meadowbrook is the safer alternative vs. Mr. Gasek's current
driveway. This again is not the measure or the needed analysis. I again suggest that this owner
(I see he has agreed to a re -plat to meet FAR requirements by adding some area from his second
20 to the East) be required to fully combine his two parcels and provide the access from his
property further to the East off of 97. The parking should also be to the East and more fully
buffered. Many other cities require uses of this type to only be accessed off County or State
highways, intended for heavier traffic. I appreciate that an access close to Meadowbrook at his
current drive may be somewhat more problematic, but moved further to the East, I believe the
entry would be both safer and all exit stacking could be better accommodated on Mr. Gasek's
own property. Finally, my instinct is that in the future a road to the East will be needed in any
event as our town develops. The stretch to the East to the next road access is substantial and
there is considerable developable area there that would warrant such an access. On the South
side of 97 there is common property, so this would be a 3 way intersection, not 4, so safer on that
measure as well. This would critically solve the unsafe visibility issues caused by the crest on 97
West of Meadowbrook.
Finally, I question if this building, falsely renovated by the applicant as a "farm" building taking
advantage of the agricultural FAR and building code, meets the requirements for a large
assembly use. I raised this question previously. Has our City required sprinklering of the
premises, for example? Does it meet the energy code for an occupied building being used year -
around for large events? Does it fully comply with bathroom and handicapped codes? We
would not allow a business in the town center to operate as a restaurant or catered event venue
without meeting these codes. I was shocked to see that portable toilets and pumped septic were
being considered, given that this will be a regular use throughout the summer and fall. This is
hardly a venue for an occasional hayride or a few events. Given what is proposed, in a relocated
structure, the facility should, if allowed at all, meet the codes for the intended actual use. I
simply cannot see how we as a City would allow a church use and many weddings and large
music events without a fully compliant building.
While I feel there cannot be a justified case made that this use is accessory or compatible, the
report of the staff and the application simply gloss over or do not address these primary
concerns. This application should be rejected unless and until it responds on these issues. And
in such consideration, the future and current uses of the area should be primary. This is the side
of Scandia most suitable in the near future for more intensive rural residential development. We
should not foreclose or prejudice this future for one bad use. This use, intended from the start, is
quite obviously a high intensity restaurant use and should not happen in this location. It is out of
place and out of character. Why would we introduce this incompatibility because one person
acquires a minimal sized parcel and moves a barn here to run an event business?
Please also consider my other comments if the PC recommends the permit: These included off-
duty police or other security for any event serving liquor, due to the rural location and risk of
neighbor disruption (by the way, will we have to add sheriff coverage for these event
nights? and if so, who pays for that?); mandatory Meadowbrook turning lane to right off
Meadowbrook built at applicant's expense; signage at exit to prevent wayward persons from
turning North to the dead end; and, most importantly, a prohibition of any self -generated events
by the applicant.
Thank you for your consideration of these comments.
John Herman
Herman Real Estate Advisors LLC
23355 Quentin Ave. N
Scandia, MN 55073
0ohnherman(dhermanadvisors.net
612-718-3616
Neil Soltis
From: Liz Tarlizzo <Itarlizzo@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 9:52 AM
To: christine@poplarhillfarm.com; n.soltis@ci.scandia.mn.us
Subject: Proposed Gacek Event Center
October 3rd, 2016
TO: Scandia Planning Committee
Scandia City Council
Mayor of Scandia
FR: Joe and Liz Tarlizzo
13230 Scandia Tr. N., Scandia, MN 55073
RE: Gacek Rural Event Center Permit Application
As a property owner/resident who lives near the Gaceks, we are asking that the City of Scandia deny this permit
application. I grew up in Scandia and my husband and I moved back in 2008 when our 4 kids were little
because we wanted to raise them in a small, peaceful and safe environment with lots of space to run and a
community to rely upon. This past winter we allowed the Gaceks to move the "redeemed" barn through our
field having been told that they were fixing up their hobby farm and wanted to build a spiritual retreat in which
to reflect on their time volunteering in Haiti. Opening a large, loud and potentially destructive reception center
that would disturb the peace of our countryside was not mentioned. Also not mentioned was the fact that they
don't actually live in Scandia. On an ethical level it bothers me that they appear to have purchased this property
with the intention to create a for profit business without prior approval regardless of the feedback of those that
live in the community and abused the kindness of the neighbors by misleading them into helping with the barn
move while disguising their true intention.
On a more pragmatic level, upon reading the latest version of their permit, I have some major concerns. It
seems as if they have addressed code concerning the number of guests, parking, sound amplification, setbacks
and screening, but I do think, based on prior behavior, that the Gacek's are quick to tell you what you want to
hear to achieve their goals and less likely to actually carry through with what they have promised. Our main
concern is with safety as there is no mention of the potential for liquor to be served or any security required to
monitoring people's intake and drivers. Three of my kids are approaching driving age and it terrifies me that
they might have to deal with negotiating a busy highway suddenly crowded with drunk wedding
guests. Wedding receptions are a notorious occasion for overindulging on alcohol and without public
transportation all those cars are going to be pulling out onto highway 97, in the dark, potentially impaired.
The code requires the party shuts down at IOpm, who is going to enforce that? Who is going to enforce that the
sound amplification parameters are met? In July who is going to make sure that the windows and doors stay
shut as code requires during the dance when it is 95 degrees and all the guests are propping open the doors?
Who is going to tell the best man that he is cut off and can't drive home? Shouldn't there be some requirement
for the property owner to be represented or present at an event on their property that is supposed to be a
secondary use?
Most importantly, what parameters are set to allow the city and residents some recourse if the conditions of this
application and permit are not met? The Gaceks need to be held financially and legally responsible for the
guests at their location and need to come up with a comprehensive, applicable, and appropriate plan to deal with
the monitoring of event guest behavior. Moreover, the members of the planning commission and city council
are obliged by common sense and required by the code of their elected position to protect the safety and sanctity
of our community, and that can only logically mean the rejection of the current Gacek proposal.
I also apologize for the tardiness of this letter, I have been meaning to write it for over a month but running my
mom taxi has kept moving it down my to do list. I hope that I haven't inconvenienced any of you with its late
arrival as I appreciate and respect the work you do for our city.
In addition to my above stated concerns following is a list of issues that have been brought forth by a group of
neighbors detailing various reasons why we ask the planning commission to deny Gacek's permit.
1. This proposed event center would create a traffic and public safety scenario on Hwy 97 would be
extremely dangerous and put myself, my family, my neighbors and anyone else traveling on Hwy 97 at a
very high risk of injury or death.
2. This would be a deadly risk for all of the children that live on Meadow Brook Ave.
3. I'm requesting that a formal traffic and safety study be conducted.
4. I'm requesting that an environmental study be conducted.
5. I'm requesting that a noise and light pollution study be conducted.
6. It appears that the setback requirements do not meet codes.
7. It appears that the noise amplification distances will not meet codes.
8. It appears that the large historical barn was moved onto the property without a permit.
9. This proposed event center would decrease my property value significantly so that one individual could
run a for-profit business in a zone that is specified for agricultural purposes.
10. This proposed event center would destroy my ability to enjoy the rural character, scenic views, open
windows, nature sounds and quiet countryside that I moved here for.
11. This applicant is already running this business. You can book a wedding reception today at:
ht1p://redeemedfarm.org/
12. The applicant's website includes information about rentable buildings for overnight stays which is never
mentioned in the application.
13. This applicant has demonstrated blatant disregard for the codes and regulations that all others are
expected/required to adhere to. The City is setting a dangerous precedent if someone is allowed to build
and launch any business they like and then ask for a permit after the fact.
14. This applicant is not a resident of Scandia.
15. This applicant's existing investment in his proposed event center should not be a consideration for
approval. If the applicant failed to follow the proper process, or the proposal does not meet the codes of
the city — that is the applicant's responsibility.
16. This proposal was met with 100% vehement opposition at the first public hearing. There were no
attendees in favor (with the exception of the applicant) whatsoever.
17. As a resident and neighbor to the applicant, I plead with the City Council, our Mayor and The Planning
Committee to not allow one individual to destroy this beautiful, peaceful, rural neighborhood that so
many enjoy for personal profit.
Sincerely,
Liz Tarlizzo & Joe Tarlizzo