The URL can be used to link to this page

2. Attachment A: Intersection Capacity Analysis Attachment A Intersection Capacity Analysis • TH97 and TH95 • TH97 and Scandia Elementary School Driveway � N VOLUME _ � tn M � O r � TH 97 � � 118 (260) � � t 21 (24) I � �ci � � N � v � � CO LOS � rn 2 H Q Q Q Q TH 97 I I f�� B (C) � � I A (A) � Q Q Q ¢ Legend AM (PM) Zavoral EIS Update Figure 1 /�roM TH 95 & TH 97 Existing AM and PM Peak Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of l TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st Mark Smith Intersection TH 95 and TH 97 enc /Co. ECOM urisdiction Date Performed 6/12/2012 nal sis Year 2012 nal sis Time Period M Peak Pro'ect Descri tion Existin EasUWest Street: TH 97 North/South Street: TH 95 Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 18 64 195 177 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 20 72 0 0 221 186 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 18 -- -- � -- -- Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 � Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L T T R U stream Si nal 0 � Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 118 21 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR �34 0 23 0 0 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 20 0 10 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 � Flared Approach N N Storage 0 � RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Dela ,Queue Len th, and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R (veh/h) 20 134 23 C (m)(veh/h) 1070 649 799 lc 0.02 0.21 0.03 95%queue length 0.06 0.78 0.09 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.4 12.0 9.6 LOS A 8 A pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 11�6 pproach LOS -- -- 8 Copyright OO 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+r"^ Version 5.6 Generated: 6/12/2012 3:47 PM file:!/C:�Documents and Settings\smithm3�L,ocal Settings\Temp\u2k1DB.tmp 6/12/2012 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st Mark Smith Intersection TH 95 and TH 97 enc /Co. ECOM urisdiction Date Performed 6/12/2012 nal sis Year 2012 nal sis Time Period PM Peak Pro'ect Descri tion Existin EasUWest Street: TH 97 North/South Street: TH 95 Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 35 207 103 155 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 39 235 0 0 117 176 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 9 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L T T R U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 260 24 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 295 0 27 0 0 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 0 8 0 0 0 Percent Grade(°/a) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Dela ,Queue Len th, and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R (veh/h) 39 295 27 C (m)(veh/h) 1230 607 919 lc 0.03 0.49 0.03 95%queue length 0.10 2.79 0.09 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.0 16.5 9.0 LOS A C A pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 15.9 pproach LOS -- -- � Copyright OO 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+r^^ Version 5.6 Generated: 6/13/2012 12:50 PM file://C:�ocuments and Settings\smithm3�L,ocal Settings\Temp\u2k2lD.tmp 6/]3/2012 � N VOLUME °' _ � � M � O r � � � TH 97 � I � 2s �2s� � 118 (260) � � t 28 (28) � I � � 21 (24) � � N � � � LOS � rn _ H a a a a TH 97 f � �..1 �— c (�) C (D) � � I C (D) —� Q ¢ A (A) � Q Q Legend AM (PM) Zavoral EIS Update Figure 2 q��M TH 95 & TH 97 Alternative 1 - Trucks added to EBT and WBT AM and PM Peak Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st Mark Smith Intersection TH 95 and TH 97 enc /Co. ECOM urisdiction Date Performed 6/12/2012 nal sis Year 2012 nal sis Time Period M Peak Pro�ect Descri tion O tion 9-4 Le Trucks added to EBT and WBT East/West Street: TH 97 North/South Street: TH 95 Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 18 64 195 177 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2� 72 0 0 221 201 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 18 -- -- � -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L T T R U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 118 28 21 28 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 1.00 0.88 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 134 31 23 0 31 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 20 100 10 0 100 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R T Dela ,Queue Len th,and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L T LT R (veh/h) 20 31 165 23 C (m)(veh/h) 1056 334 509 799 lc 0.02 0.09 0.32 0.03 95%queue length 0.06 0.31 1.43 0.09 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.5 16.9 15.5 9.6 LOS A C C A pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 16.9 14.7 pproach LOS -- -- C 8 Copyright OO 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+r"^ Version 5.6 Generated: 6/12/2012 3:48 PM filc://C:�Documents and Settings\smithm3�i,ocal Settings\Temp\u2k1E7.tmp 6/12/2012 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st Mark Smith Intersection TH 95 and TH 97 enc /Co. ECOM urisdiction Date Performed 6/12/2012 nal sis Year 2012 nal sis Time Period PM Peak Pro'ect Descri tion O tion 1-4 Le Trucks added to EBT and WBT East/West Street: TH 97 North/South Street: TH 95 Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 35 207 103 155 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 39 235 0 0 117 176 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 9 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L T T R U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 260 28 24 28 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 1.00 0.88 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 295 31 27 0 31 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 100 8 0 100 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R T Dela ,Queue Len th,and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L T LT R (veh/h) 39 31 326 27 C (m)(veh/h) 1230 295 456 919 /c 0.03 0.11 0.71 0.03 95%queue length 0.10 0.35 6.81 0.09 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.0 18.6 32.0 9.0 LOS A C D A pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 18.6 30.2 pproach LOS -- — C D Copyright O 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/13/2012 12:53 PM file://C:�Documents and Settings\smithm3�L,ocal Settings\Temp\u2k22A.tmp 6/13/2012 � N VOLUME �' _ � M M 00 O O � N �- TH 97 I � t� 146 (288) � � f 21 (24) I � u� r� M N � � � � (O LOS � rn _ Q Q ~ a a TH 97 � I � B (C� � I I A (A) � Q Q Q Q Legend AM (PM) Zavoral EIS Update Figure 3 �C� TH 95 & TH 97 Alternative 2 - Trucks added to EBL and SBR AM and PM Peak Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st Mark Smith Intersection TH 95 and TH 97 enc /Co. ECOM urisdiction Date Performed 6/12/2012 nal sis Year 2012 nai sis Time Period M Peak Pro'ect Descri tion O tion 2-3 Le Trucks added to EBL and SBR EasUWest Street: TH 97 North/South Street: TH 95 Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 18 64 195 205 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 20 72 0 0 221 232 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 18 -- -- � -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L T T R U stream Si nal 0 � Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 146 21 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 165 0 23 0 0 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 36 0 10 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 � Flared Approach N N Storage 0 � RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Dela ,Queue Len th, and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R (veh/h) 20 165 23 C(m)(veh/h) 1028 586 799 Ic 0.02 0.28 0.03 95%queue length 0.06 1.17 0.09 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.6 13.5 9.6 LOS A 8 A pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 13•� pproach LOS -- -- 8 Copyright OO 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/�2/2012 3:48 PM file://C:�Documents and Settings\smithm3�L,ocal Settings\Temp\u2k1F3.tmp 6/12/2012 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st Mark Smith Intersection TH 95 and TH 97 enc /Co. ECOM urisdiction Date Performed 6/12/2012 nal sis Year 2012 nal sis Time Period PM Peak Pro ect Descri tion O tion 2-3 Le Trucks added to EBL and SBR EasUWest Street: TH 97 North/South Street: TH 95 Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 35 207 103 183 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 39 235 0 0 117 207 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 9 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L T T R U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 288 24 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 32� 0 27 0 0 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 15 0 8 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Dela ,Queue Len th,and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R (veh/h) 39 327 27 C (m)(veh/h) 1197 540 919 lc 0.03 0.61 0.03 95%queue length 0.10 4.42 0.09 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.1 21.8 9.0 LOS A C A pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 20.8 pproach LOS -- -- C Copyright OO 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/13/2012 12:55 PM file://C:�Documents and Settings\smithm3�L,ocal Settings\Temp\u2k236.tmp 6/13/2012 � N VOLUME •L � 0 0 s U (1) TH 97 •--- 2�0 (�so) � 10 (10) 120 (210) -� � � 20 (20) � �n o �n o L�S j �L � 0 � � U � TH 97 � A (A) � A (A) A (A) � � � A (A) � m ¢ m Q Legend AM (PM) Zavoral EIS Update Figure 4 ��M TH 97 8� School Drive - Existing AM and PM Peak Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st MC Intersection TH 97&School enc /Co. urisdiction Date Performed 9/19/2011 nal sis Year 2010 nal sis Time Period M School 9-10 Pro ect Descri tion EasWVest Street: TH 97 North/South Street: School Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 120 20 10 210 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR � 133 22 11 233 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 6 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration T R L T U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 15 10 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 16 0 11 0 0 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 6 0 6 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 � Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Dela ,Queue Len th, and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R (veh/h) 11 16 11 C (m)(veh/h) 1401 603 906 /� 0.01 0.03 0.01 95%queue length 0.02 0.08 0.04 Control Delay(slveh) 7.6 11.1 9.0 LOS A 8 A pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 10.3 pproach LOS -- -- 8 Copyright OO 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+r^^ Version 5.6 Generated: 6/13/2012 10:40 AM file://C:�Documents and Scttings\smithm3�I.ocal Settings\Temp\u2k 19A.tmp 6/13/2012 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st MC Intersection TH 97&School enc /Co. urisdiction Date Performed 9/19/2011 nal sis Year 2010 nal sis Time Period PM School 3-4 Pro'ect Descri tion EasUWest Street: TH 97 North/South Street: School Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 210 20 10 180 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 233 22 11 200 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 6 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration T R L • T U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 15 10 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR �6 0 11 0 0 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 6 0 6 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Dela ,Queue Len th,and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R (veh/h) 11 16 11 C(m)(veh/h) 1287 551 796 lc 0.01 0.03 0.01 95%queue length 0.03 0.09 0.04 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.8 11.7 9.6 LOS A B A pproach Delay(s/veh) -- — 10.9 pproach LOS -- — 8 Copyright O 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/13/2012 10:41 AM file:UC:�Documents and Settings\smithm3�Local Settings\Temp\u2k]A6.tmp 6/13/2012 � N VOLUME ' .` 0 0 0 � U � TH 97 �— 23s �2os� �— 10 (10) 158 (238) —� � r � 20 (20) —�, �n o �n o L�S j .` � O O L U � TH 97 �— A (A) � A (A) A (A) —♦ � � A (A) � m ¢ m Q Legend AM (PM) Zavoral EIS Update Figure 5 q�C� TH 97 8� Schooi Drive - Trucks added to EBT and WBT AM and PM Peak Two-Way Stop Control Page l of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st MC Intersection TH 97&School enc /Co. urisdiction Date Performed 9/19/2011 nal sis Year 2010 nal sis Time Period M School 9-10 Pro�ect Descri tion East/West Street: TH 97 North/South Street: School Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 158 20 10 238 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR � 175 22 11 264 0 vehlh Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 6 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration T R L T U stream Si nal 0 � Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 15 10 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 16 0 11 0 0 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 6 0 6 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 � Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Dela ,Queue Len th,and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R (veh/h) 11 16 11 C (m)(veh/h) 1352 547 858 lc 0.01 0.03 0.01 95%queue length 0.02 0.09 0.04 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.7 11.8 9.3 LOS A 8 A pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 10.7 pproach LOS -- -- 8 Copyright OO 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/13/2012 8:01 AM file://C:�Documents and Settings\smithm3�i.ocal Settings\Temp\u2kB2.tmp 6/13/2012 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st MC Intersection TH 97&School enc /Co. urisdiction Date Performed 9/19/2011 nal sis Year 2010 nal sis Time Period PM School 3-4 Pro�ect Descri tion EasUWest Street: TH 97 North/South Street: School Drive Intersection Orientation: Easf-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 238 20 10 208 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 264 22 11 231 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 6 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration T R L T U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 15 10 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR �6 0 11 0 0 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 6 0 6 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 � Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Dela ,Queue Len th,and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R (veh/h) 11 16 11 C (m)(vehlh) 1253 507 765 /� 0.01 0.03 0.01 95%queue length 0.03 0.10 0.04 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.9 12.3 9.8 LOS A 8 A pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 11•3 pproach LOS -- -- 8 Copyright OO 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/13/2012 8:04 AM file://C:�Documents and Settings\smithm3�Loca1 Settings\Temp\u2kBF.tmp 6/13/2012 Directional Page 1 of 2 DIRECTIONAL TWO-LANE HIGHWAY SEGMENT WORKSHEET General Information Site Information Analyst AMC Highway/Direction of Travel Agency or Company AECOM From/To Date Performed 7/2/2012 Jurisdiction Analysis Time Period AM Peak Analysis Year 2012 Project Description: Subalt 3A ATR 386-PK Hours Input Data - - - - - - -- - -- --tilioubJai•.•.•idtli - - - -- Tt � Lane��.idth ____ _t1 � Class I highway Class II —. Lane�;ridth tt Jhoul�Jer t:idth it highway� Class III highway - - - - - - - - --- -- - --- --- -- - _= -- - Terrain f' Level Rolling S�gmernlenqth. Li _ _ mi GradeLength mi Up/down Peak-hour factor,PHF 0.88 No-passing zone 20% Analysis direction vol.,Vd 320veh/h �o•�:r��m urr�,•; o�o Trucks and Buses,PT 6% Opposing direction vol.,Vo 145veh/h %Recreational vehicles,PR 4% Shoulder width ft 6.0 Access points mi 8/mi Lane Width ft 12.0 Segment Length mi 0.0 Average Travel Speed Analysis Direction(d) Opposing Direction(o) Passenger-car equivalents for trucks,ET(Exhibit 15-11 or 15-12) 1.3 1.6 Passenger-car equivalents for RVs,ER(Exhibit 15-11 or 15-13) 1.0 1.0 Heavy-vehicle adjustment factor,fHV,ATS��(�+pr(Er-1)+pR(ER-1)) 0.982 0.965 Grade adjustment factor�, f9 ATS(Exhibit 15-9) 1.00 1.00 Demand flow rateZ,v�(pc/h)v�=V�/(PHF'f9 ATS f fHV,ATS� 370 171 Free-Fiow Speed from Field Measurement Estimated Free-Flow Speed Base free-flow speed4,BFFS 55.0 mi/h Mean speed of sample3,SFM Adj.for lane and shoulder width,4 f�S(Exhibit 15-7) 0.0 mi/h Total demand flow rate,both directions,v Adj.for access points4,fA(Exhibit 15-8) 2.0 mi/h Free-flow speed,FFS=SFM+0.00776(v/fHV,ATS� Free-flow speed,FFS (FSS=BFFS-f�S fA) 53.0 mi/h Adj.for no-passing zones,fnp,A7S�Exhibit 15-15) �� m��h Average travel speed,ATSd FFS-0.00776(vd,ATs+ 47.7 mi/h �o,ATS�-fnp,ATS Percent Time-Spent-Following Analysis Direction(d) Opposing Direction(o) Passenger-car equivalents for trucks,ET(Exhibit 15-18 or 15-19) 1.1 1.1 Passenger-car equivalents for RVs,ER(Exhibit 15-18 or 15-19) 1� ��o Heavy-vehicle adjustment factor,fH�=1/(1+pT(ET 1)+pR(ER�)) 0.994 0.994 Grade adjustment factor�,f9 prsF(Exhibit 15-16 or Ex 15-17) 1.00 1.00 Directional flow ratez,v�(pc/h)v�V/(PHF'fHV,PTSF�fg,PTSF� 366 166 Base percenttime-spent-following4,BPTSFd(%)=100(1-ea�db) 35.4 Adj.for no-passing zone,fnp,PTSF�Exhibit 15-21) 3�.4 Percent time-spent-following,PTSFd(%)=BPTSFd+f np,PTSF*��d,PTSF��d,PTSF+ 57.0 �o,PTSF� Level of Service and Other Performance Measures Level of service,LOS(Exhibit 15-3) C Volume to capacity ratio,v/c 0.22 file://C:\Documents and Settings\christoa\Local Settings\Temp\s2kDD.tmp 7/2/2012 Directional Page 2 of 2 Capacity,Cd,ATs(Equation 15-12)pc/h 1700 Capacity,Cd,P7SF�Equation 15-13)pclh 1700 Percent Free-Flow Speed PFFSd(Equation 15-11 -Class III only) 90.0 Bicycle Level of Service Directional demand flow rate in outside lane,vo�(Eq.15-24)veh/h 363.6 Effective width,Wv(Eq.15-29)ft 24.00 Effective speed factor,St (Eq.15-30) 4.79 Bicycle level of service score,BLOS(Eq.15-31) 3.47 Bicycle level of service(Exhibit 15-4) C Notes 1.Note that the adjustment factor for level terrain is 1.00,as level terrain is one of the base conditions.For the purpose of grade adjustment,specific downgrade segments are treated as level terrain. 2.If v�(vd or vo)>=1,700 pc/h,terminate analysis--the LOS is F. 3.For the anaiysis direction only and for v>200 vehlh. 4.For the analysis direction only 5.Exhibit 15-20 provides coefficients a and b for Equation 15-10. 6.Use alternative Exhibit 15-14 if some trucks operate at crawl speeds on a specific downgrade. Copyright O 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS 2010TM Version 6.1 Generated: 7/2/2012 1:13 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\christoa\Local Settings\Temp\s2kDD.tmp 7/2/2012 Directional Page 1 of 2 DIRECTIONAL TWO-LANE HIGHWAY SEGMENT WORKSHEET General Information Site Information Analyst AMC Highway/Direction of Travel Agency or Company AECOM From/To Date Performed 7/2/2012 Jurisdiction Analysis Time Period PM Peak Analysis Year 2012 Project Description: Subalternative 3A ATR 386-PK Np "8 Input Data - -- -- - -- - -- - -Chouldat•�.•idd7 - - - -- fl � Lanc v:idlh __ ____ _ t1 ; Class I highway Class II —! Lanc�;;idth it Jhuuld•�r•�:�i�Jth tt highway� Class III highway - -- - - - - - --- - - - -- - ---__ ---- Terrain Level Rolling $�=gmern length, L� mi Grade Length mi Up/down Peak-hour factor,PHF 0.88 No-passing zone 20% Analysis direction vol.,Vd 320veh/h 9ioa:NorihArruv; o�o Trucks and Buses,PT 6°/a Opposing direction vol.,Vo 145veh/h %Recreational vehicles,PR 4% Shoulder width ft 6.0 Access points mi 8/mi Lane Width ft 12.0 Segment Length mi 0.0 Average Travel Speed Analysis Direction(d) Opposing Direction(o) Passenger-car equivalents for trucks,ET(Exhibit 15-11 or 15-12) 1.3 1.6 Passenger-car equivalents for RVs,ER(Exhibit 15-11 or 15-13) 1.0 1.0 Heavy-vehicle adjustment factor,fHv,nTs-��+Pr(ET-1)+pR(ER-1)) 0.982 0.965 Grade adjustment factor�, f9 A7s(Exhibit 15-9) 1.00 1.00 Demand flow ratez,v�(pc/h)v�=V�I(PHF`f9 ATS�fHV,ATS� 370 171 Free-Flow Speed from Field Measurement Estimated Free-Fiow Speed Base free-flow speed4,BFFS 55.0 mi/h Mean speed of sample3,SFM Adj.for lane and shoulder width,4 f�s(Exhibit 15-7) 0.0 mi/h Total demand flow rate,both directions,v Adj.for access points4,fA(Exhibit 15-8) 2.0 mi/h Free-flow speed,FFS=SFM+0.00776(V/fHV,ATS� Free-flow speed,FFS (FSS=6FFS-f�S fA) 53.0 mUh Adj.for no-passing zones,fnp,ars�Exhibit 15-15) � � m��h Average travel speed,ATSd FFS-0.00776(vd,ATS+ 47.7 mi/h �o,ATS�-fnp,ATS Percent Time-Spent-Following Analysis Direction(d) Opposing Direction(o) Passenger-car equivalents for trucks,ET(Exhibit 15-18 or 15-19) 1.1 �•� Passenger-car equivalents for RVs,ER(Exhibit 15-18 or 15-19) 1.0 1.0 Heavy-vehicle adjustment factor,fH�1/(1+pT(ET 1)+pR(ER�)) 0.994 0.994 Grade adjustment factor�,f9 pTSF�Exhibit 15-16 or Ex 15-17) 1.00 1.00 Directional flow rate2,v�{pc/h)v�V/(PHF'fHv,PTSF'fg,P7SF� 366 166 b 35.4 Base percent time-spent-following4,BPTSFd(%)=100(1-ea"d ) Adj.for no-passing zone,fnp,PTSF�Exhibit 15-21) 31.4 Percent time-spent-following,PTSFd(%�=BPTSFd+f np,PTSF{��d,PTSF��d,PTSF+ 57.0 �o,PTSF� Level o/Service and Other Performance Measures Level of service,LOS(Exhibit 15-3) C Volume to capacity ratio,v/c 0.22 file://C:\Documents and Settings\christoa\Local Settings\Temp\s2kE4.tmp 7/2/2012 Directional Page 2 of 2 Capacity,Cd,ATs(Equation 15-12)pc/h 1700 Capacity,Cd,PTSF�Equation 15-13)pc/h 1700 Percent Free-Fiow Speed PFFSd(Equation 15-11-Class ill only) 90.0 Bicycle Level of Service Directional demand flow rate in outside lane,v��(Eq.15-24)veh/h 363.6 Effective width,Wv(Eq.15-29)ft 24.00 Effective speed factor,S� (Eq.15-30) 4 79 Bicycle level of service score,BLOS(Eq.15-31) 3.47 Bicycle level of service(Exhibit 15-4) C Nofes 1.Note that the adjustment factor for level terrain is 1.00,as level terrain is one of the base conditions.For the purpose of grade adjustment,specific downgrade segments are treated as level terrain. 2.If v�(vd or vo)>=1,700 pc/h,terminate analysis--the LOS is F. 3.For the analysis direction only and for v>200 veh/h. 4.For the analysis direction only 5.Exhibit 15-20 provides coefficients a and b for Equation 15-10. 6.Use alternative Exhibit 15-14 if some trucks operate at crawl speeds on a specific downgrade. Copyright OO 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS 2010TM Version 6.1 Generated: 7/2/2012 1:14 PM file://C:ADocuments and Settings\christoa\Local Settings\Temp\s2kE4.tmp 7/2/2012 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ite Information nal st MC Intersection TH 95 and TH 97 enc /Co. ECOM urisdiction Date Performed 7/2/2092 nal sis Year 2012 nal sis Time Period M Peak Pro'ect Descri tion Subalternative 3A East/West Street: TH 97 North/South Street: TH 95 Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 18 64 195 177 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2� �2 0 0 221 201 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 18 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Confi uration L T T R U stream Si nal 0 � Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 118 31 21 31 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 1.00 0.88 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR �34 35 23 0 35 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 20 100 10 0 100 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 � Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Confi uration LT R T Dela ,Queue Len th,and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L T LT R (veh/h) 20 35 169 23 C (m)(veh/h) 1056 334 502 799 lc 0.02 0.10 0.34 0.03 5%queue length 0.06 0.35 1.51 0.09 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.5 17.0 15.8 9.6 LOS A C C A pproach Delay(s/veh) — -- 17.0 15.1 pproach LOS -- -- C C Copyright OO 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/2/2012 1:06 PM file://C:ADocuments and Settings\christoa\Local Settings\Temp\u2kBD.tmp 7/2/2012 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ite Information nai st MC Intersection TH 95 and TH 97 enc lCo. ECOM urisdiction Date Performed 7/2/2012 nal sis Year 2012 nal sis Time Period PM Peak Pro�ect Descri tion Subalternative 3A East/West Street: TH 97 North/South Street: TH 95 Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 35 207 103 155 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 39 235 0 0 117 176 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 9 -- -- � -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Confi uration L T T R U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 260 31 24 31 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 1.00 0.88 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 295 35 27 0 35 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 100 8 0 100 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 � Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Confi uration LT R T Dela ,Queue Len th,and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L T LT R (veh/h) 39 35 330 27 C (m)(veh/h) 1230 295 450 919 /c 0.03 0.12 0.73 0.03 5%queue length 0.10 0.40 7.35 0.09 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.0 18.8 34.1 9.0 LOS A C D A pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 18.8 32.2 pproach LOS -- -- C D Copyright�O 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7l2/2012 1:08 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\christoa\Local Settings\Temp\u2kC4.tmp 7/2/2012 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st MC Intersection TH 97&School enc /Co. urisdiction Date Performed nal sis Year 2010 nal sis Time Period M School 9-10 Pro'ect Descri tion Subalternative 3A East/West Street: TH 97 North/South Street: School Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West tud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 161 20 10 241 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 178 22 11 267 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 6 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 Confi uration T R L T U stream Si nal 0 � Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 15 10 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 16 0 11 0 0 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 6 0 6 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 � RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Confi uration L R Dela ,Queue Len th, and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R (veh/h) 11 16 11 C (m)(veh/h) 1349 543 855 lc 0.01 0.03 0.01 5%queue length 0.02 0.09 0.04 ontrol Delay(s/veh) 7.7 11.8 9.3 LOS A 8 A pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 10.8 pproach LOS -- -- B Copyright OO 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+7M Version 5.6 Generated: 7/2I2012 1:10 PM file://C:ADocuments and Settings\christoa\Loca] Settings\Temp\u2kCE.tmp 7/2/2012 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ite Information nal st MC Intersection TH 97&Schoo/ enc /Co. urisdiction Date Performed 7/2/2012 nal sis Year 2010 nal sis Time Period M School 3-4 Pro�ect Descri tion Subalternative 3A EasWVest Street: TH 97 North/South Street: School Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 241 20 10 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR � 267 22 11 231 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 6 -- -- Median T pe Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 Confi uration T R L T U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 15 10 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 1.00 0.90 9.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 16 0 11 0 0 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 6 0 6 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 � Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Confi uration L R Dela ,Glueue Len th,and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R (veh/h) 11 16 11 C (m)(veh/h) 1250 505 762 /� 0.01 0.03 0.01 5%queue length 0.03 0.10 0.04 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.9 12.4 9.8 LOS A 8 A pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 11.3 pproach LOS -- -- B Copyright OO 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/2/2012 1:11 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\christoa\Local Settings\Temp\u2kD4.tmp 7/2/2012