Nitrogen Mitigation Bolton-Menk Memo 6-23-16 • � BO�TON 8�- i�/I � N K , I NC�
. i Consulting Engineers & Surveyors
�� t 12224 NicolletAvenue• Burnsville, MN 55337
Phone(952)890-0509 • Fax(952)890-8065
www.bolton-me n k.com
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 23, 2016
To: Honorable Randall Simonson, Mayor
Neil Soltis, City of Scandia
Jeff Anderson, City of Scandia
From: Seth Peterson, P.E.
Ryan Goodman, P.E.
Subject: Scandia—Bliss Collector WWTF Nitrogen Mitigation
Back�round
The Bliss Collector Wastewater Treatment Facility(WWTF) is located in Scandia, MN. The
system was constructed in 1986. It is a soil based subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)
consisting of a gravity and pressure collection system with two lift stations, three septic tanks in
series totaling 7,500 gallons, one lift station that feeds the sand filters, three 15,000 square foot
sand filters, one lift station that feeds the drainfields and three drainfield trench cells at 1,210 feet
of trench per cell. A figure of the Bliss system is attached. The facility treats wastewater from
approximately 75 residential homes. There are 70 individual septic tanks and 46 shared STEP
system through which wastewater passes before entering the WWTF. Each STEP station has a
15 gpm pump. The current permit regulates the system as a Class D WWTP with a design flow
of 19,800 gallons per day(gpd) and is effective from March 18, 2015 through February 29, 2020.
The current permit includes monitoring and testing for both phosphorous and nitrogen at various
locations within the treatment system. Test results indicate the Bliss Drainfield is not effective in
removal of nitrogen and high levels of nitrate nitrogen (above 10 mg/L) have been found in one
of the monitoring wells.
A recent compliance evaluation conducted by the MPCA indicated several deficiencies
concerning monitoring data and the Nitrogen Mitigation Plan. Overall, the system is well
DESIGNING FOR A 8E1TER TOMORROW
Bolton &Menk is an equal opportunity employer
• ��,�
' � .� Page 2
maintained and is in good operating condition. However, several Discharge Monitoring Reports
(DMR's) were submitted late and the Nitrogen Mitigation plan, which was required within one
year of the permit issuance, was incomplete and lacked the detail necessary to comply with the
current MPCA permit. Elevated nitrate nitrogen levels in one of the groundwater monitoring
wells at the Bliss Collector WWTF warrants investigation of systems designed to consistently
remove nitrate nitrogen to less than 10 mg/L.
Groundwater Monitorin�Results
Groundwater testing results for gound water monitoring well GW-004 from April 2013 through
October 2015 is shown in Table 1 below. It is evident that nitrate nitrogen levels exceed the
MDH guideline of 10 mg/L and appear to be seasonally consistent. Currently, groundwater
monitoring well GW-004 is the only monitoring well experiencing elevated nitrate nitrogen
levels and this well is downgradient of the infiltration trenches. While some
nitrification/denitrification and dilution may occur naturally in the soil, given the high total
nitrogen concentration and lack of denitrification occurring in the system, some level of nitrogen
treatment will likely be required. Several options for possible treatment methods to remove
nitrate nitrogen are discussed below.
Table 1
Groundwater Monitoring Data: GW-004
Scandia Bliss Drainfield
Ammonia Nitrate
Total Kjeldahl � Total
Date �mg/L as N) Nitrogen (TKN) N�n°�L s N)1 Nitrogen**
Apr-13 0.1 0.64 179 18.5
Jul-13 0.1 0.53 13.1 13.6
Oct-13 0.2 0.5 23.9 24.4
Apr-14 0.1 0.5 26.5 27.0
Jul-14 0.1 0.5 13.1 13.6
Oct-14 0.2 2.0 29 31.0
Apr-15 0.0 0.0 27.4 27.4
Jul-15 0.0 0.0 13.4 13.4
Oct-15 0.0 0.0 21.5 21.5
Average 0.1 0.5 20.6 21.2
*Limit for Nitrate-Nitrogen is 10 mg/L.
**Total Nitrogen is the sum of TKN plus Nitrite-Nitrogen
DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW
Bolton&Menk is an equal opportuniy employee
.
.(� �
"\� Page 3
��
Treatment Methods/Alternatives
Nitrogen exists naturally in wastewater in two forms, organic nitrogen, and ammonium.
Ammonium is created through the bacterial decomposition of organic nitrogen. Typically,
nitrogen removal is accomplished by a two-stage process typically referred to as
nitrification/denitrification. Nitrification is the conversion of ammonia into nitrate. This process
is accomplished by nitrifying bacteria in an aerobic environment. Usually, Biochemical Oxygen
Demand (BOD) is reduced in the aerobic environment simultaneously. Full conversion from
ammonia to nitrate is dependent on several variables such as the number of nitrifying bacteria
and oxygen levels. If the wastewater is placed in an anoxic tank(low dissolved oxygen levels),
microorganisms convert the nitrate into inert nitrogen gas through denitrification. The nitrogen
gas is dispersed into the atmosphere. Typically, external carbon sources, such as methanol,
ethanol, or other proprietary carbon sources are added to assist in promoting denitrification.
As noted earlier, nitrate nitrogen levels typically range from 15-30 mg/L in groundwater
monitoring well GW-004. Ammonia levels tend to be relatively low when compared to nitrate
nitrogen levels, indicating that there may be partial nitrification that occurs naturally in the
system. However, the current MDH drinking water standard of 10 mg/L is exceeded for nitrate
nitrogen. To help reduce total nitrogen levels, specifically nitrate nitrogen levels, it may prove
advantageous to identify and evaluate systems that can promote both nitrification and
denitrification. Both nitrification/denitrification and denitrification only systems will be
evaluated to determine what options best suit the Bliss Drainfield to meet the MDH drinking
water standard.
Currently, the Bliss Drainfield sits on a 7.3 acre lot. Residential lots sit to the North, South, and
East of the drainfield. Big Marine Lake is approximately 1,200 feet to the East of the drainfield.
CSAH 15 (Manning Trail N) runs directly to the west of the drainfield. The main components for
the nitrogen mitigation systems are described below in detail:
A. Alternative 1: Denitrification System
To meet the MDH drinking water standard the system must consistently achieve a nitrate
nitrogen level of less than 10 mg/L at either the end of discharge of the treatment facility
or within downstream monitoring wells. The system will be designed to treat the design
DESIGNING FOR A BETfER TOMORROW
Bolion&Menk is an equal opporiunity empic�:
.
.
�� �� Page 4
flow of 19,800 gpd. A denitrification only system assumes the influent BOD and TSS are
low and do not require extra treatment and the influent ammonia is nitrified.
There are proprietary systems that can accomplish denitrification in fewer processes or
simultaneously with other processes (such as simultaneous nitrification and
denitrification). These systems use batch reactions and manipulate the microarganisms'
environment to achieve nutrient removal to the highest level biologically possible.
Generally, there will be four main components for a denitrification only system:
• Denitrification reactor dosing tank
• Denitrification reactor with chemical addition
• Polishing tank
• Drainfield dosing tank
The typical layout of the tanks allows for the most efficient treatment for denitrification
with the dosing tank at the head of the treatment train and the drainfield dosing tank at
the end. Wastewater will flow by gravity through the denitrification and polishing tanks
but is pumped into the drainfields from the dosing tank. The sizes of the tanks vary
depending on the flow and level of treatment required.
B. Alternative 2: Nitrification/Denitrification Svstem
Another type of system that can be used to treat wastewater high in nitrogen is a
nitrification/denitrification system. This system uses the same denitrification process
described above, but nitrification treatment is done first. Nitrification is an important step
in total nitrogen removal. A typical nitrification/denitrification system includes the
following:
• Settling tank
• Equalization basin
• Nitrification reactor
• Denitrification reactor dosing tank
DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW
Bolton 8�Menk is an equal opportunily employer:
��(.( " \
� � Page 5
• Denitrification reactor with chemical addition
• Polishing tank
• Drainfield dosing tank
The sizes and numbers of tanks and reactors are dependent on the level of treatment
necessary and the flow into the system. The systems are laid out with the settling tank at
the head of the treatment train and the drainfield dosing tank at the end. The tanks are
buried underground with access through hatches for maintenance and observation.
It is important to note that a typical treatment system would consist of the above
components far high nitrogen removal. There are other proprietary systems that are
designed to nitrify and denitrify with various treatment methods. The above descriptions
represent a basic layout for nitrogen removal that is efficient and keeps capital costs
down.
Cost
Below are the estimated costs for the two systems described above. Table 2 provides a cost
estimate for the denitrification system and Table 3 provides a cost estimate for the
nitrification/denitrification system.
Table 2
Cost Estimate for Denitrification System
Item Cost
Mobilization $20,000
Dosin Tank $15,000
Denitrification Reactor with Carbon Addition $57,000
Polishing Tank $35,000
Drainfield Dosing Tank $72,000
Chemical Feed Equipment $6,500
Installation $215,000
Land ??
Subtotal $420,500
En ineerin & Contingency(25%) $105,000
Total Cost $525,500
DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW
Bolton&Menk is an equal opporluniy employer.
.(�"\� Page 6
Table 3
Cost Estimate for Nitrification/Denitrification System
Item Cost
Mobilization $35,000
Influent Metering Manhole $20,000
Settling Tank $35,500
Equalization Tank $47,000
Nitrification/Aerobic Reactor $195,000
Dosing Tank $15,000
Denitrification Reactor with Carbon Addition $57,000
Polishin Tank $35,000
Drainfield Dosin Tank $72,000
Chemical Feed Equipment $6,500
Installation $250,000
Land ??
Subtotal $768,000
Engineering& Contingency(25%) $192,000
Total Cost $960,000
Recommendation
Based on the test results and nitrate-nitrogen concentrations above the MDH drinking water
standard the City will need to install additional treatment at some point to meet the 10 mg/L
MDH standard. This will require a significant capital cost as well as increase operation and
maintenance costs. In addition, further investigation is needed to determine if improvements can
be placed on the existing Bliss property. The City will need to continue to plan far
improvements and evaluate options for treatment for the Bliss system.
DESIGN►NG FOR A BETTER TOMORROW
Bolton&Menk is an equal opporlunily employe,r
,�
• . � � ,�
.
�•;��" '� ���_�� �;, � � .
p
.� � '� �.$* �*��' .. : k i6 / »
;.
�� ,w.,._ ,sE` t � � d" �
�n, � r t' � ,�,,:w � � � :s�:�: �t;�`s.a� ,�. ":� � �
. k '
...� � 1 1 ,. " �. , ? I ,\
. ,s + ' m
.
. , . .� � ..,. p"
9 r
1
� +
W ��� .� � si ,_� �� ��^� � �°�y � �
�� .; ! �i�
y
�
� i " � � �. � � � �s�» � � /
=� �*_' t�
�, `a, ���`'��, � �
� �; ' E
�" �C�09 � �� , * � " �y �
*;s '�w ..�,, s?t.��. P ��#'��,� u��,�..y ��''`�`� � rv� � 1°`� ,�
,
� �;�Y ;�`:�. ._ .�,. ��y�t �'"_
, � � ' � _�..,�._,...:._' -_r"_'---_------------� .`s'�
� . �� �� .,... �,ss*.. "� ' #� i !n��,
. I
� � ;. � .,. i i
�t p ��Q � � a.� � ���� �.:
� y'� `�
W G� �` �`. �,�+ y„ ,�`,�Ga��� .a � ��
��
��' ♦
' , 0 O� +w"`�'f `'�"� "� «� � �.
� � � i � : "�w � � s. "<',�' ��;���
n� �":
i i �' ��
� � � , '` ' � �,
� � � �. �
w �
kl�+�' e � ,l 9 � �Y� � y ��
� ��� ��� �
� . � � � � � � � � � . �� �
r ; ,� �,`;
� e n� f " r�� *,ti.
� � , , � � ,.� �
c � p � ���
D � ,� , � � :�
E �pr cm , ; ,�,� ' �.�xp'�.
� � . . C D °`�� ,.,.^ �t. ' Y�,...,,
�� �� � 0 , �� ��
�
o � � � � + �� `�'
�' � � � � +
�- n #
� � �� �
�
� ��� �
w � �
m r��� � � ���`� � a��* �� SdC�d :' �'� ��`�r.�t`�'�� `' � � ���;
r ��:� �y,.
!
� � ,: L t���� ' ���tiOC�{;���'��'41{�� ��� a' �� �� `1���C,, � ���. '+
� �� �, .,„ ; ,. . . f �f �
.
( 'r �
� �- , „ :. ..�q,,,�`� � M-,C � r".-f►RY1L'1 . a
:�
O � . -� � _ �... �,-�: ,„ . . . ..... . ... :,-� VlA.A71J47 � � ,�
t � �$
m_ � �
O � .
Z N
�
m� O 'Monitoring Wells � Dosing Stations O �� c� •�� �
=a n Piezometers Drainfield Piping W �" �'
�� �. �
� • -
o� ,
o� ••� O Sealed Well Forcemain ���- �' ' � " � °
,� �_n.� .._� , _ ._ .
� �� ..,�.. .. .��
��° � � Septic Tank � Parcels ""` "" `
. .,,_
w� _ �
�� ` • Valve Manhole � � � y°���; ��
��
E� 0 60 eet � °
p u� S�oyu�rce Washingfon Count MnDOT,Esn�asemap �, �� � � � �
m m �^,&�"";�"' . �i „ , �� ��,. ��' . . .. � ,w ... ... ...�.�C+',�r�4*: e,:,�i,�.