3.b meeting October 22, 2008 October 22, 2008
Special Joint Meeting—Scandia Planning Commission and City Council
The Scandia Planning Commission and the Scandia City Council met in a joint special meeting
on the above date. The following were in attendance: Planning Commissioners Tom Krinke,
Christine Maefsky, Susan Rodsjo and Peter Schwarz; Mayor Dennis Seefeldt and Council
Members Michael Harnetty, Donnette Yehle, Peter Crum and Dolores Peterson, Planning
Commission Chair Chris Ness was absent. Staff present: Administrator Anne Hurlburt and City
Attorney David Hebert. Also present: Jean Coleman, C.R. Planning.
Mayor Seefeldt called the meeting to order at 6:04 p.m.
Mayor Seefeldt introduced the purpose of the meeting,which was to discuss the comments
received at the public hearing on the draft Comprehensive Plan and the written comments
submitted subsequent to the hearing. The primary issues are: 1) density in the Ag Core areas; 2)
Rural Commercial nodes; 3) aggregate resources; and 4) the "VN" (Village Neighborhood) and
"VMU" (Village Mixed Use) expansion,
The Ag Core designation and how the 2 units per 40 acre density came to be proposed were
discussed. The consensus of the group was that the Ag Core designation shoulcEremain in the
plan,but that the density should be chahied. 9,..„4 units per 40 acres and that the maximum density
bonus that could be earned as an incentive fur open space conservation subdivisions should be
100%. This would continue the policy of the cuiN4plan's Gk-AG land use designation.
The Rural Commercial nodes were discussed, ,Mayor Seefeldt out that the narrative
describing the Copas'node needs to be revised to the Abrahamson's site.
VA,
The consensus of the Comm&ssloftoctaypeft, was the former"Trails End" site at
Highways 95 & 97Should be mapped as deOhltherci0 node given its historic land use.
How the draft plan treats the city's aggregate resources was discussed. It was agreed that Map 6
should be revised to accurately show The extent of these resources in the city. Whether or not the
plan should designate mining areas as a separate land use category was discussed. It was agreed
that this shoulecontinue, and that no new mining areas should be added to the future land use
map. A new miningoperation would require the applicant to request an amendment to the plan.
The boundaries of the VN and VMU areas were discussed. The consensus was that two areas
should be removed from the VN (south of Highway 97 and east of Ozark, and northeast of
Parrish Road.) It was agreed that the area north of Goose Lake, which is designated "VC" on the
current land use plan, should be added to the proposed "VN" area.
Commissioner Maefsky raised a question whether or not the proposed Lakeshore Conservation
Overlay should require open space conservation design for all developments. The consensus was
that the language should "encourage", but not require, conservation design.
October 22, 2008
Scandia Planning Commission and City Council
Page 2 of 2
Commissioner Maefsky asked the group to discuss the intent of proposed policy 9.2.3 regarding
"preservation of a public access to waters when land is developed." It was agreed that this policy
should be stricken.
The "Scenic Roads and Viewsheds" list and map (pages 114-117) were discussed. It was agreed
to remove the list and map from the plan, as much more work is needed to identify them and how
they will be addressed.
Ms. Coleman pointed out that revisions must still be made to the local water plan portion of the
plan to respond to watershed district comments,before the Comprehensive Plan is submitted to
the Metropolitan Council for review.
Mayor Seefeldt said that density policies would need to address "short" or"long"40's created by
the public survey system. Currently there is language in the plan and in the code. The updated
code will need to continue to address these situations.
Councilmember Crum asked for additional discussion of lot sic and densities in the "VN"
areas. There is concern that resubdividing larger lots into 17acre building sites could produce
unattractive and incompatible development. It was agreed that the plan would be revised to
require 21/2 acre lots, except that housing at 1-acre densities could be approved with bonuses.
The Planning Commission set a special teeing fq16:00 p.m. on Tuesday, November 18, prior
to the regular City Council meeting. The consultant willrhake the changes to the draft plan for
the Commission's review, so that they ma consider a.recommendation to the City
Council. The Council could receive their reCOmdetid*ation at their 7:00 p.m. meeting that
evening.
The meeting adjourned at 8: 4 p.m.
Respectfully submitted.
Anne Hurlburt
Administrator/ Clerk