Loading...
9.d) Responses to Request for Proposals, Audit Services Meeting Date: 09/20/2011 Agenda Item: � � City Council Agenda Report City of Scandia 14727 2091h St. North Scandia, MN 55073 (651) 433-2274 Action Requested: Review responses to the request for proposals (RFP) for audit services for 2011, 2012 and 2013 and determine the next steps for choosing an auditor. Deadline/ Timeline: Audit proposals are all valid for at least 60 days (November 14, 2011.) Background: • At the July 19 meeting, the City Council authorized release of the RFP. It was advertised on the City's website, with the League of Minnesota Cities, and mailed to nine accounting firms that provide audit services to other municipalities. Ten responses were received by the September 14, 2011 (4:00 p.m.) deadline. • Staff's review of the proposals is on-going. We have not had time to call references. We expect to have more information to report by the time of the September 20 Council meeting. However, we have some initial comments: ➢ Scandia does not have accountants on staff and relies on its auditors to prepare financial statements and for consultations on accounting and finance issues throughout the year. It's important that we have a firm with depth and experience, and that is available to us on short notice. ➢ With very little staff time available it is important to have an audit firm that can conduct the audit in the most efficient manner possible. Most of the larger firms conduct"paperless audits" using electronic media and computer-aided processes. The longer they are in our office for field work, the more disruptive it is for all staff and the more staff time it takes. ➢ Based on our experience transitioning to a new audit firm for 2007, changing firms can take a considerable amount of staff time. Unless there is a compelling reason to change, staff would recommend against it. The current auditor(LarsonAllen) has been responsive, developed good working relationships with staff, and is very familiar with the city. ➢ It appears that most of the firms are well qualified,but staff has concerns about two of them. Michael W. Pofahl, CPA, is a sole practitioner. The proposal did not provide much detail regarding the audit approach and mostly repeated the city's RFP. The proposal did not meet some of the basic requirements (no copies, no electronic submission.) Attempts to reach him by phone were Page 1 of 2 09/16/11 unsuccessful, and there was no voice mail or answering machine. No e-mail address was provided. We have not yet contacted the listed municipal clients, but we are concerned that his methods may not be up-to-date. Exhibit D of the proposal list 2 "associates expected"but their qualifications and roles are not provided. We are concerned that the field work will take considerably more time with only one person working on the audit, and that he is expecting more work on city staff's part than we can provide. We are concerned he may not be reachable for ongoing issues or questions. The fee would be about half of the next lowest cost proposal but we see this as a red flag. ➢ We also have some concerns about the Goldetsky Etling proposal. This is a very small firm that was formed less than 2 years ago. The principals appear to have good qualifications, having previously worked at Eide Bailly (the audit firm that served Scandia prior to LarsonAllen.) However, we are concerned that the company does not have the depth or track record of the other firms. ➢ Not including the Pofahl and Goldetsky Etling proposals, the cost proposals from the other firms range from $58,276 (Smith Schafer) to $70,500 (HLB Tautges Redpath.) ➢ LarsonAllen's proposal was $65,925 (for 3 years.) This is $1,075 less than the proposal they submitted in June. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Council consider retaining LarsonAllen as the city's auditor. The potential cost savings is small compared to the cost and risk of transitioning to a new firm. If the Council wants to consider other proposals, you should determine what the next step(s) will be. The Council could decide to select an audit firm based upon the proposals, or interview two or more of the firms before making a selection. The entire Council could conduct interviews, or you could appoint a subcommittee. If interviews are held, they should be scheduled so that a firm may be selected no later than either the October 18 or November 8 Council meeting. They should also be held when Treasurer Colleen Firkus is available, as she is the principal contact between the City and the auditing firm. Attachments/ • Summary of Audit Proposals Materials provided: . Request for Proposals, August 2011 • Ten Proposals (Abdo Eick & Meyers, Baker Tilly, Goldetsky Etling, HLB Tautges Redpath, KDV, LarsonAllen, MMKR, Michael W. Pofahl, CPA, Schlenner Wenner& Co., Smith Schafer) Contact(s): Prepared by: Anne Hurlburt, Administrator (audit proposals) Page 2 of 2 09/16/11 Summary of Audit Proposals City of Scandia, September 2011 Firm: Abdo Eick&Meyers LLP Baker Tilly Goldetsky Etling, P.A. HLB Tautges Redpath KDV Contact: Andrew K. Berg,CPA James Murray, CPA Daniel Etling,CPA Peggy Moeller, CPA Matthew Mayer,CPA 952 715-3003 612 876-4914 952 746-9526 651426-7000 952 563-6800 andrew.ber�@aemcpas.com James.murrav@bakertilly.com detlin�@goldetskyetlin�.com pmoeller@hlbtr.com mmaver@kdv.com Cost: 2011 $21,442 $19,550 $18,190 $22,850 $19,825 2012 $21,442 $19,550 $18,500 $23,450 $20,440 2013 $21,442 $19,550 $19,110 $24,200 $21,055 3-year Total $64,326 $58,650 $55,900 $70,500 $61,320 Cost Rank(1- high to 10-low) 5 � 9 1 6 Hours: 2011 185 175 171 144 205 2012 185 175 171 144 205 2013 185 175 171 144 205 Proposal No(current audit client meets Yes Yes references not included) Yes Yes requirements? Office location: Edina, MN Minneapolis, MN Bloomington, MN White Bear Lake, MN Bloomington &St. Cloud, MN Size of firm: 90+;20 in governmental 200+; 120 in public sector 2 (+1 subcontractor on audit 95;23 in gov't&non- 115; 21 gov't audit services group group team) profit group team Governmental 35%of business;approx. 175 Over 550 municipal clients, Resumes of partners indicate 70 gov't clients, 20%of 150+gov't audits experience: audits annually other gov't& non-profits 30+years audit experience business Local Chisago City, Elk River, Oakdale, North Branch, Becker, Elko New Rosemount,St. Paul,Jackson, No list of current clients government Lindstrom, Montrose, Lester Prairie(many WI & IL) provided. Little Canada,West St. Market, Falcon Hts, clients: Rockford Paul etc. Hanover, Princeton Paperless;able to link to Paperless paperless Notes: Banyon financials Date of external quality review: Date of external quality Date of external quality Date of external quality 2009 review: 2010 Date of external quality review: 2008 review: 2008 review: 2010 1 Summary of Audit Proposals City of Scandia,September 2011 Firm: LarsonAllen MMKR Michael W. Pofahl,CPA Schlenner Wenner&Co. Smith Schafer Contact: Craig Popenhagen,CPA Aaron J. Nielsen,CPA Michael W. Pofahl, CPA Molly Thompson, CPA Jason Miller,CPA 612 397-3087 952 545-0424 651213-6632 320 251-0286 651770-8414 cpopenha�en@larsonallen.com anielsen@mmkr.com mthompson@swcocpas.com jmiller@smithschafer.com Cost: 2011 $21,450 $22,450 $9,400 $20,744 $18,475 2012 $21,975 $22,950 $8,700 $21,763 $19,480 2013 $22,500 $23,400 $8,400 $22,831 $20,321 3-year Total $65,925 $68,800 $26,500 $65,338 $58,276 Cost Rank(1- high to 10-low) 3 2 10 4 8 Hours: 2011 185 230 200 204 183 2012 185 230 170 192 183 2013 185 230 150 182 183 Proposal meets Yes Yes No(no copies, no Yes Yes requirements? electronic submission) Office location: Minneapolis, MN Minneapolis, MN Chisago City, MN St. Cloud, MN Maplewood, MN Size of firm: 50 in gov't group 30 Sole practitioner(?) 53 78 50 yrs;25 municipal 30 yrs Governmental Over 500 governmental clients audits, 30 school districts, Partner has 20+years audit 30 city and 4 township accounting/auditing experience: nationwide other gov't entities last experience clients year; 55%of billings experience Local Arden Hills, Mounds Albany, Bayport,St. Buffalo,Orono,Anoka, Nowthen,Afton, Chisago Hugo,St. Paul Park,Osseo, government N/atertown, Mahtomedi View,Shoreview, Lake Township Augusta,Stewart, Stewartville, Rochester clients: Brooklyn Center, Edina Holdingford Scandia Auditor 2007-2010 No e-mail contact information, not able to Paperless Date of external quality Date of external quality Date of external quality Notes: Date of external quality review: review: 2010 reach by phone review: 2010 review: 2005 2010 Date of external quality review: 2001 2 Y ` � . � I � � � � SC DIA REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES AUGUST, 2011 City of Scandia 14727 209T" St. N. Scandia, Minnesota 55073 Anne Hurlburt, City Administrator Phone (651) 433-2274 Fax (651) 433-5112 a.hurlburt(a�ci.scandia.mn.us www.ci.scandia.mn.us J CITY OF SCANDIA REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. GENERAL INFORMATION (Page 3) A. Term of Engagement B. Subcontracting II. NATURE OF SERVICES REQUIRED (Page 3) A. General B. Scope of Work to be PerFormed C. Auditing Standards to be Followed D. Reports to be Issued E. Working Paper Retention and Access to Working Papers III. DESCRIPTION OF GOVERNMENT (Page 5) A. Principal Contacts B. Background Information C. Pension Plans IV. TIME REQUIREMENTS (Page 6) A. Proposal Calendar B. Schedule for 2011 Fiscal Year Audit V. AUDIT RESPONSIBILITIES (Page 6) A. City Staff Assistance B. Work Area and Equipment C. Report Preparation D. State Reporting VI. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS (Page 7) VII. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (Page 7) A. General Requirements B. Independence C. License to Practice in Minnesota D. Firm Qualifications and Experience E. Partner, Supervisory and Staff Qualifications and Experience F. Similar Engagements with Other Government Entities G. Specific Audit Approach VIII. DOLLAR COST PROPOSAL (Page 9) A. Total All-Inclusive Maximum Price IX. EVALUATION PROCEDURES (Page 10) A. Review of Proposal B. Evaluation Criteria C. Oral Presentation D. Right to Reject Proposals APPENDICES (Page 12) A. Proposer Guarantees B. Fee Schedule City of Scandia,Request for Proposals 2 Professional Auditing Services,August 2011 CITY OF SCANDIA REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL I. GENERAL INFORMATION The City of Scandia is requesting proposals from qualified firms of certified public accountants to audit its financial statements for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2011, December 31, 2012, and December 31, 2013. These audits are to be performed in accordance with the generally accepted auditing standards and the standards for financial audits set forth in the U.S. General Accounting Office's (GAO) Government Auditing Standards (1988) and State Legal Compliance audit requirements. There is no expressed or implied obligation for the City of Scandia to reimburse responding forms for any expenses incurred in preparing proposals in response to this request. The City of Scandia reserves the right to retain all proposals submitted and to use any ideas in a proposal regardless of whether that proposal is selected. Submission of a proposal indicates acceptance by the firm of the conditions contained in this request for proposals, unless clearly and specifically noted in the proposal submitted and confirmed in the contract between the City of Scandia and the firm selected. A. Term of Engagement A three-year contract is contemplated, subject to the annual review by the Scandia City Council and the annual avaitability of an appropriation. B. Subcontracting No subcontracting will be allowed without the express prior written consent of the City of Scandia. II. NATURE OF SERVICES REQUIRED A. General The City of Scandia is soliciting the services of qualified firms of certified public accountants to audit its financial statements for the fiscal years ending December 31, 20010, December 31, 2011, and December 31, 2012. B. Scope of Work to be Performed The City of Scandia desires the auditor to express an opinion on the fair presentation of its general purpose financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. The auditor shall also be responsible for performing procedures involving required supplementary information required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) as mandated by generally accepted auditing standards (GAAP). Assistance will be provided to the City for implementing GASB Statement No. 51, Accounting and Financia/Reporting for Intangible Assets, effective 2010, and Statement No. 54, Fund Ba/ance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definifions, effective 2011. City of Scandia,Request for Proposals 3 Professional Auditing Services,August 2011 C. Auditing Standards to be Followed To meet the requirements of this request for proposal, the audit shall be performed in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards as set forth by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the standards for financial audits set forth in the US General Accounting Office's Government Auditing Standards (1994), the provisions of the Single Audit Act of 1996, the provisions of US Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133, and the provisions of the MN Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Local Government (pursuant to MN Statute 6.65). D. Reports to be Issued Following the completion of the audit of the fiscal year's financial statements, the auditor shall issue the following reports: 1. A report consisting of the Annual Financial Statements and Supplemental Information. 2. Combined and individual fund statements. 3. A report on the fair presentation of the financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. 4. A report on compliance and on internal control over financial reporting based on an audit of financial statements. 5. A report on compliance with applicable laws and regulations. 6. The reports on compliance shall include all instances of noncompliance. 7. Reportable conditions that are also material weaknesses shall be identified as such in the report. 8. Non-reportable conditions discovered by the auditors shall be reported in a separate Letter to Management which shall be referred to in the report(s)on internal controls. Auditors shall assure themselves that the City Administrator and City Council is informed of each of the following: a. The auditor's responsibility under generally accepted auditing standards b. Significant accounting policies c. ManagemenYs judgments and accounting estimates d. Significant audit adjustments e. Other information in documents containing audited financial statements f. Disagreements with management g. Management consultation with other accountants h. Major issues discussed with management prior to retention i. Difficulties encountered in performing the audit j. Legal compliance findings k. Significant deficiencies I. Control deficiencies m. Management recommendations n. Financial analysis o. Update of resolved (and unresolved) issues from prior years City of Scandia,Request for Proposals 4 Professional Auditing Services,August 2011 Auditors shall be required to make an immediate, written report of all irregularities and illegal acts or indications of illegal acts of which they become aware to the City Administrator and to the City Council. E. Working Paper Retention and Access to Working Papers All working papers and reports must be retained, at the auditor's expense, for a minimum of three (3) years, unless the firm is notified in writing by the City of Scandia of the need to extend the retention period. The auditor will be required to make working papers available, upon request, to the following parties or their designees: City of Scandia, State Auditor, US General Accounting Office (GAO), parties designated by the federal or state governments or by the City of Scandia as part of an audit quality review process. In addition, the firm shall respond to the reasonable inquiries of successor auditors and allow successor auditors to review working papers relating to matters of continuing accounting significance. III. DESCRIPTION OF GOVERNMENT A. Principal Contacts The auditor's principal contacts will be the City Administrator(Anne Hurlburt) and City Treasurer (Colleen Firkus)who will coordinate the assistance to be provided by the City of Scandia to the auditor. B. Background Information The City of Scandia is located in Washington County, Minnesota. The City is approximately 39 square miles in area. The most recent official population estimate is 3,936 (2010 Census). Scandia was incorporated on January 1, 2007 from the former New Scandia Township. The city operates under Minnesota Statutes "Plan A" form of government. The City's governing body consists of a Mayor and four Councit members, all elected at large. Council members serve overlapping terms of office. The City consists of the following departments: Administration, Zoning/Building Inspections, Public Works, and Fire. The city contracts for police, engineering, legal and planning services, and for the operation of a community sewage system (201 Project) on Big Marine Lake (with Washington County.) The city currently has four full-time employees (Administrator/Clerk, Building/Code Enforcement Official/Public Works Supervisor, and two Maintenance Workers. There are four regular part-time employees (Deputy Clerk, Treasurer, Office Assistant, and Recreation Program Coordinator.) Various seasonal and temporary employees supplement the staff from time-to-time. The Fire Department is primarily paid on call, with a small stipend paid to officers. The City's fiscal year is the calendar year. Banyon Data Systems software is used for all financial operations. An electronic copy of the most recent audit of the City(for the year ending 12/31/10) is available for download on the city's website (www.ci.scandia.mn.us.) City of Scandia,Request for Proposals 5 Professional Auditing Services,August 2011 C. Pension Plans The City of Scandia participates in the following pension plans: Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota Statewide Volunteer Firefighter Retirement Plan administered by PERA (effective January 1, 2011) The city's only post-retirement obligation as defined by GASB 45 is the state-directed health coverage retirement options under MN Statutes Chapter 471. IV. TIME REQUIREMENTS A. Proposal Calendar The following is a list of key dates up to and including the date proposals are due to be submitted: August 1, 2011 Request for proposal issued September 14, 2011 Due date for proposals September/October 2011 Interviews with selected firms � October 18 or November 15, 2011 City Council selection B. Schedule for the 2011 Fiscal Year Audit In December 2011 a preliminary meeting will be held to discuss any potential audit problems and the interim work to be performed and to develop a schedule for the audit process. The City of Scandia will have all records ready for audit and all management personnel available to meet with the firm's personnel in February of 2012. The auditor shall complete all field work by March 15, 2012, unless otherwise agreed upon by City Staff. The auditor shall have drafts of the audit report(s) and recommendations to management available for review April 15, 2012, unless otherwise agreed upon by City Staff. City staff will complete their review of the draft reports as expeditiously as possible. It is not expected that this process should exceed two weeks. During that period, the auditor should be available for any meetings that may be necessary to discuss the audit reports. Once all issues for discussion are resolved, the final signed report shall be delivered to the City of Scandia within ten working days, but not later than one week prior to the exit meeting with the City Council. The exit meeting with City Council will be held no later than the first Council meeting in June 2012. City staff and the audit firm may hold a final wrap-up meeting following the Council meeting. This should be held within 30 days following that meeting. A similar time schedule will be developed for audits of future fiscal years. V. AUDIT RESPONSIBILITIES A. City Staff Assistance City staff will be available during the audit to assist the firm by providing information, documentation and explanations. City of Scandia,Request for Proposals 6 Professional Auditing Services,August 2011 B. Work Area and Equipment The City of Scandia will provide the auditor with reasonable workspace, tables and chairs. The auditor will also be provided with access to a telephone, photocopier/scanner/FAX machine, and an internet connection. C. Report Preparation Report preparation and editing shall be the responsibility of the auditor, including any visual presentations for the City Council. The City of Scandia will require an official copy of the final audit report as well as an electronic(i.e. PDF) copy. Ten paper copies shall be produced for the city's use. D. State Reporting The auditor shall complete all forms mandated to be sent to the state for reporting purposes. VI. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS The Proposer shall submit ten (10) originals and an electronic copy (emailed) of the completed proposal to: Anne Hurlburt, City Administrator City of Scandia 14727 209th Street N Scandia MN 55073 Email: a.hurlburt(a�ci.Scandia.mn.us The proposal shall include: 1. Title Page-- Title page showing the request for proposal subject; the firm's name, address, email, and telephone number of the contact person; and the date of the proposal. 2. Table of Contents 3. Transmittal Letter-- A signed letter of transmittal briefly stating the proposer's understanding of the work to be done, the commitment to perform the work within the time period, a statement why the firm believes itself to be best qualified to perform the engagement and a statement that the proposal is a firm and irrevocable offer for 60 days. 4. Detailed Proposal--The detailed proposal should follow the order set forth in Sections VII and VIII of this request for proposals. 5. Executed copies of Proposer Warranties (Appendix A). 6. Schedule of Proposed Fees for 2011, 2012 and 2013 audits (Appendix B). The City of Scandia reserves the right, where it may serve the city's best interest, to request additional information or clarifications from the proposers. At the discretion of the City, firms submitting proposals may be requested to make oral presentations as part of the evaluation process. � VII. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL A. General Requirements The purpose of the Technical Proposal is to demonstrate the qualifications, competence and capacity of the firms seeking to undertake an independent audit of the City of Scandia in conformity with the requirements of this request for proposal. The Technical Proposal should City of Scandia,Request for Proposals 7 Professional Auditing Services,August 2011 demonstrate the qualifications of the firm and of the particular staff to be assigned to this engagement. It should also specify an audit approach that will meet the request for proposal requirements. The Technical Proposal should be prepared simply and economically, providing a straightforward, concise description of the proposer's capabilities to satisfy the requirements of the request for proposal. While additional data may be presented, the following subjects, Item Nos. B through G must be included. They represent the criteria against which the proposal will be evaluated. B. Independence The firm should provide an affirmative statement that it is independent of the City of Scandia as defined by generally accepted auditing standards of the US General Accounting Office's Auditing Standards (1994). The firm should also list and describe the firm's professional relationships involving the City of Scandia or any of its agencies for the past five years, together with a statement explaining why such relationships do not constitute a conflict of interest relative to performing the proposed audit. In addition, the firm shall give the City of Scandia written notice of any relevant professional relationships entered into during the period of this agreement. C. License to Practice in Minnesota An affirmative statement should be included that the firm and all assigned key professional staff are properly licensed to practice in Minnesota. D. Firm Qualifications and Experience The proposer should state the size of the firm, the size of the firm's governmental audit staff, the location of the office from which the work on the engagement is to be performed and the number and nature of the professional staff to be employed in this engagement on a full-time basis, the number and nature of the staff to be so employed on a part-time basis, and the number and nature of the staff to be so employed on a temporary basis. The firm shall also provide information on the results of any federal or state desk reviews of its audits during the past three years. In addition, the firm shall provide information on the circumstances and status of any disciplinary action taken or pending against the firm during the past three years with state regulatory bodies or professional organizations. The firm should provide a list of government-related references that the City can contact. E. Partner, Supervisory and Staff Qualifications and Experience Identify the principal supervisory and management staff, including engagement partner, managers, other supervisors and specialists, who would be assigned to the engagement. Indicate whether each such person is licensed to practice as a certified public accountant in Minnesota. Provide information on the government auditing experience of each person and overall experience of each person. Provide as much information as possible regarding the number, qualifications and experience of the specific staff to be assigned to this engagement. Indicate how the quality of the staff, over the term of the engagement, will be assured. Engagement partners, managers, other supervisory staff, and specialists may be changed if those personnel leave the firm, are promoted, or are assigned to another office. City of Scandia,Request for Proposals $ Professional Auditing Services,August 2011 The City of Scandia must be notified in writing if consultants and firm specialists mentioned in response to this request for proposal would be changed. Notification shall be done prior to any such change. Other audit personnel may be changed at the discretion of the proposer provided that replacements have substantially the same or better qualifications or experience. F. Similar Engagements with Other Government Entities For the firm's office that will be assigned responsibility for the audit, list the most significant engagements (minimum of 3, maximum of 5) performed in the last three years that are similar to the engagement described in this request for proposal. These engagements should be ranked on the basis of total staff hours. Indicate the scope of work, date, engagement partners, total hours, and the name and telephone number of the principal client contact. For city engagements, indicate whether or not the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report received the GFOA Certificate of Achievement for the most recent audit. G. Specific Audit Approach The proposal should set forth a work plan, including an explanation of the audit methodology to be followed, to perform the services required in Section II of this request for proposal. The proposal should include sample formats for required reports. VI11. DOLLAR COST PROPOSAL A. Total All-Inclusive Maximum Price The dollar cost proposal should contain all pricing information relative to performing the audit engagement as described in this request for proposal. The total all-inclusive maximum price to be bid is to contain all direct and indirect costs including all out-of-pocket expenses. The audit contract is to include telephone inquiries and other assistance related to the audit and future audits requiring a minimum amount of time. The City of Scandia will not be responsible for expenses incurred in preparing and submitting the technical proposal or the dollar cost proposal. Such costs should not be included in the proposal. The first page of the dollar cost proposal should include the following information: 1. Name of Firm 2. Certification that the person signing the proposal in entitled to represent the firm, empowered to submit the bid, and authorized to sign a contract with the City of Scandia 3. A total all-inclusive Maximum Price for the 2011, 2012 and 2013 engagements. The second page of the dollar cost bid should include a schedule of professional fees and expenses, presented in the format provided in the attachment(Appendix B)that supports the total all-inclusive maximum price. Any out-of pocket expenses including those for firm personnel for its employees shall be included in the total all-inclusive maximum price submitted by the firm. City of Scandia,Request for Proposals 9 Professional Auditing Services,August 2011 If it should become necessary for the City of Scandia to request the auditor to render any additional services to either supplement the services requested in the RFP or to perform additional work as a result of the specific recommendation included in any report issued on this engagement, then such additional work shall be performed only if set forth in an addendum to the contract between the City of Scandia and the firm. Any such additional work agreed to between the City of Scandia and the firm shall be performed at the same rates set forth in the schedule of fees and expenses included in the dollar cost proposal. Progress payments may be made on the basis of hours of work completed during the course of the engagement incurred in accordance with the firm's dollar cost proposal. Interim billing shall cover a period of not less than a calendar month. Payment of final billing will be held pending delivery of the firm's final reports. Should the selected auditor not make any deadlines set forth in this proposal, payment shall also be held. Detail spreadsheets shall be made available that verify the billing for the period billed. An electronic copy would be preferred. Line items that should be shown on the spreadsheet include: service date and time, employee name, rate, time billed, amount billed, description of work performed, and any miscellaneous expenses associated with the audit. Spreadsheet should also include any hours or expenses that are part of the audit but not billed. IX. EVALUATION PROCEDURES A. Review of Proposal The City of Scandia reserves the right to retain all proposals submitted and use any idea in a proposal regardless of whether that proposal is selected. B. Evaluation Criteria Proposals will be evaluated using three sets of criteria. Firms meeting the mandatory criteria will have their proposals evaluated for both technical qualifications and price. The selection process will include, but not be limited to, the following criteria: 1. Mandatory Elements a) The audit firm is independent and licensed to practice in Minnesota. b) The firm has no conflict of interest with regard to any other work performed by the firm for the Ciry of Scandia. c) The firm adheres to the instructions in this request for proposal on preparing and submitting the proposal. d) The firm submits a copy of its last external quality control review report and the firm has a record of quality audit work. 2. Technical Quality a) Expertise and Experience 1) The firm's past experience and performance on comparable government engagements. 2) The quality of the firm's professional personnel to be assigned to the engagement and the quality of the firm's management support personnel to be available for technical consultation. b)Audit Approach 1) Adequacy of proposed staffing plan for various segments of the engagement City of Scandia,Request for Proposals 10 Professional Auditing Services,August 2011 2) Adequacy of sampling techniques 3) Adequacy of analytical procedures 3. Price-- Cost will be a factor in the selection of an audit firm. However, price will not be the sole determining factor in the selection process. C. Oral Presentation During the evaluation process, the City may, at its discretion, request one or all firms to make an oral presentation. Such presentation will provide firms with an opportunity to answer any questions the City may have on a firm's proposal. Not all firms may be asked to make such oral presentation. D. Right to Reject Proposals The City of Scandia reserves the right without prejudice to reject any or all proposals. Submission of a proposal indicates acceptance by the firm of the conditions contained in this request for proposal unless clearly and specifically noted in the proposal submitted and confirmed in the contract between the City of Scandia and the firm selected. City of Scandia,Request for Proposals 11 Professional Auditing Services,August 2011 � APPENDIX A CITY OF SCANDIA PROPOSER GUARANTEES Proposer warrants that it is willing and able to comply with State of Minnesota laws with respect to foreign (non-state of Minnesota) corporations. Proposer warrants that it is willing and able to obtain an errors and omissions insurance policy providing a prudent amount of coverage for the willful or negligent acts or omissions of any officers, employees or agents thereof. Proposer warrants that it will not delegate or subcontract its responsibilities under an agreement without the prior written permission of the City of Scandia. The proposer certifies that it can and will provide and make available at a minimum, all senrices set forth in Section II, Nature of Services Required. Proposer warrants that all information provided in connection with this proposal is true and accurate. Signature of Official: Name (typed or printed): Title: Firm: Date: City of Scandia,Request for Proposals 12 Professional Auditing Services,August 2011 - ir APPENDIX B CITY OF SCANDIA SCHEDULE OF PROFESSIONAL FEES AND EXPENSES FOR THE AUDIT OF THE 2011, 2012 AND 2013 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2011 2012 2013 Proposed Proposed Proposed Hours Hourly Hourly Hourly Total Rates Rates Rates Personnel Costs: Partners $ Mana ers $ Supervisory Staff $ Other Personnel S ecif $ Subtotal: $ Other: Re ort Pre /Processin $ Single Audit Cost (A- 133 $ Prepare Report of Fin Stmts & Su Info $ Process State- mandated Re orts $ Out-of-Pocket Ex enses $ Meals and Lod in $ Transportation/ Milea e $ Other S ecif $ Subtotal: $ Total All-inclusive Price for Audit Services $ City of Scandia,Request for Proposals 13 Professional Auditing Services,August 2011 � This page intentionally left blank. City of Scandia,Request for Proposals 14 Professional Auditing Services,August 2011