The URL can be used to link to this page

4.a Application for variance from shoreland and wetland setbacksReference: Jensen Variance Request 11245218 1h Street North Project No.: 17122.000 (Jensen) Routing: SUBJECT: Request for Variances from setbacks to a wetland and the Ordinary High Water Level of German Lake for installation of a driveway. MEETING DATE: March 5, 2019 LOCATION: 11245 218th Street North, (PID 18.032.20.14.0003) APPLICANT: Brent Jensen 16231 Hanson Blvd Andover, MN 55304 OWNER: Brent and Joellen Jensen 16231 Hanson Blvd Andover, MN 55304 ZONING: General Rural (GR) District and Shoreland Overlay District 60 -DAY PERIOD: March 23, 2019 ITEMS REVIEWED: Complete application, plans, and supplemental information received January 22, 2019. An rtnl*Ud*owned compaaW prornminq affrrnatlo acllon artd equal appo-rlunily 4-04 cedar Street, 5vle 1500 Saint Paul, MN 55101 551 292,440.'1 rkda.com TKDA Memorandum To: Scandia Planning Commission Copies To: Neil Soltis, City Administrator Brenda Ecklund, City Clerk Brent Jensen, applicant From: Merritt Clapp -Smith, Planner Date: February 26, 2019 Reference: Jensen Variance Request 11245218 1h Street North Project No.: 17122.000 (Jensen) Routing: SUBJECT: Request for Variances from setbacks to a wetland and the Ordinary High Water Level of German Lake for installation of a driveway. MEETING DATE: March 5, 2019 LOCATION: 11245 218th Street North, (PID 18.032.20.14.0003) APPLICANT: Brent Jensen 16231 Hanson Blvd Andover, MN 55304 OWNER: Brent and Joellen Jensen 16231 Hanson Blvd Andover, MN 55304 ZONING: General Rural (GR) District and Shoreland Overlay District 60 -DAY PERIOD: March 23, 2019 ITEMS REVIEWED: Complete application, plans, and supplemental information received January 22, 2019. An rtnl*Ud*owned compaaW prornminq affrrnatlo acllon artd equal appo-rlunily Jensen Variance Request Submitted: February 26, 2019 Scandia Planning Commission Page 2 Public Hearing: March 5, 2019 PROPERTY INFORMATION Parcel description: 11245 218th Street North is a 19.1 acre lot that includes part of German Lake. County property records indicate that 11.6 acres of the lot are in the Wetland Program. Zoning: The parcel is located in the General Rural (GR) District and the Shoreland Overlay District of German Lake, classified as a "Natural Environment" lake. Land use: The property has no structures on it. Natural Features and Conditions: The topography of the property is heavily sloped and narrows to a peninsula in German Lake at the south end. A 'Manage 1' wetland sits at the northwest corner of the property. The property is heavily wooded. A gravel driving path runs south about a 1/3 of the way into the property from 2181h St N. A relatively flat building site sits at the center of the parcel and is only accessible by passing along an approximately 200 foot wide strip of land that sits between German Lake and the wetland. Aerial and property survey for 11245 2181h Street North. 7 Jensen Variance Request Submitted: February 26, 2019 Scandia Planning Commission Page 3 Public Hearing: March 5, 2019 DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST: Setback variances for a driveway from the OHWL of German Lake and from a wetland. • Required OHWL setback from German Lake is 200 feet; Proposed is approximately 145 feet • Required setback from the Manage 1 wetland is 75 feet; Proposed is approximately 10 feet The applicant is proposing to run a driveway to a future building pad on the property. An existing, partial driveway runs much closer to German Lake than the proposed driveway. The proposed driveway would sit further back from the lake and follows an alignment designed to minimize tree cutting, grading and fill. At the location where the driveway would run closest to the wetland, a 24 inch by 30 foot culvert is proposed to run under the driveway, to allow water runoff to flow between the high point in the area and the wetland, without erosion impacts. EVALUATION OF VARIANCE REQUEST Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan describes the General Rural District as a residential area of mixed lot sizes. The Plan supports single-family residential uses in the GR District. The Comprehensive Plan includes goals to protect water and native plant resources by working with property owners and through enforcement of the City's ordinances, including the Shoreland ordinance. The Droaosed drivewav location moves the drivewav further awav from German Lake and uses an alignment designed to minimize vegetative cutting and is therefore consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan for uses in the General Rural and Shoreland Overlay Districts. Development Code Requirements relevant to proposed application Lot Size and Setbacks Lot Size The applicant's parcel is 19.1 acres, larger than minimum lot size of 2.0 acres for the GR district and more than the 2.5 acre minimum lot size for riparian parcels in the Shoreland Overlay District. It is also larger than the underlying density of 4 dwelling units per 40 acres. Setbacks The proposed driveway location requires variances from the OHWL of German Lake and from a wetland. • Required OHWL setback from German Lake is 200 feet; Proposed is approximately 145 feet • Required setback from the Manage 1 wetland is 75 feet; Proposed is approximately 10 feet 1 Jensen Variance Request Submitted: February 26, 2019 Scandia Planning Commission Page 4 Public Hearing: March 5, 2019 Driveway Access Described above. Vegetation The property is a wooded lot. The proposed driveway location is preferred over the existing driveway location in order to move the driveway further back from German Lake and to follow an alignment that minimizes vegetative cutting. Grading and Drainage The applicant has applied for a grading permit from the City of Scandia. He proposes to install at culvert under the driveway where it runs closest to the wetland. Please see comments from City Engineer in next item. City Engineer Comments City Engineer, Ryan Goodman, provided the following recommendations and comments. Variance • If the Variance request is approved then the applicant will have to obtain a grading & building permit to construct the proposed driveway/house. I understand they have submitted a grading/land alteration permit application but the information listed below needs to be addressed prior to review. • Proposed culvert west invert shall be approved by Washington Conservation District & Watershed District. Setting it too low will drain the existing wetland. Grading Plan — Grading/Land Alteration Permit • Proposed project is located within a Shoreland Zone and will disturb fifty (50) cubic yards or more and/or disturbance of 1,000 square feet or more along with clearing trees. • Site work shall be in compliance of the Watershed District and Washington Conservation District. • Driveway dimensions, slopes, and elevations need to be included on the proposed driveway. • Proposed 24" Culvert needs to include invert elevations and a final driveway grade spot elevation right above culvert for review and approval by the Watershed District and City. • Driveway needs to be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department, including the discussion of a midpoint turnaround. • Slopes matching into wetland edges shall conform to 6:1 slope as much as possible. Provide this information at the culvert crossing location. • Soil piles from the excavation for the proposed work shall be handled with care. Material should be hauled off site immediately or stored in a manner that has 7 Jensen Variance Request Submitted: February 26, 2019 Scandia Planning Commission Page 5 Public Hearing: March 5, 2019 perimeter protection. All erosion control devices must be installed before any construction work begins including rock construction entrance. Street sweeping shall be anticipated. • Temporary restoration may be required to contain any erosion. Upon completion of the grading, site restoration shall be completed as soon as possible. • Grading plan needs to identify the proposed garage low floor opening and the house low floor opening to verify elevation is 3 feet above the OHW and 1 foot above any natural emergency overflows. • City has previously permitted and approved the driveway access to 218th Street and will remain in its current location. • Work should be coordinated with Private Utilities to allow extension of services at the same time the driveway work is happening. • A Gopher State One Call is required before any excavation work can start. At time of Building Permit • Proposed height of improvements within/adjacent to Northern States Power easement shall be reviewed. • Septic drainfield system and secondary system will have to be shown and approved by Washington County. • Proposed well location will need to be shown to verify required separation distances and approved by the Minnesota Department of Health. Stormwater Management and Watershed District Comments The Carnelian -Marine -St. Croix Watershed District Board issued Conditional Approval to Mr. Jensen for a Land Disturbance Plan to construct a driveway. The report is attached. DNR Comments The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Area Hydrologist, Jenifer Sorensen, reviewed the application and does not have comments on the driveway location. She expressed concern that any future home would likely require a variance from the OHWL of German Lake and she questioned where septic would go. ADDlicants' Rationale for the Variance and Discussions with the Ci The applicant's rationale for the variances for a new driveway is to use a route that that is less steep than the existing driveway (which is rarely used, since the lot has no dwelling at this time), that moves the driveway further away from German Lake, and that requires less grading, fill and tree cutting than alternatives alignments would. Criteria for Variance and Findin 1 Jensen Variance Request Submitted: February 26, 2019 Scandia Planning Commission Page 6 Public Hearing: March 5, 2019 Chapter 1, Section 6.0 of the Development Code includes the criteria and required process for considering variance requests. Each item to be considered for a variance is identified below in italics, followed by the Planner's findings regarding the requested setback variances for a driveway from the OHWL of German Lake and from an adjacent wetland at 11245 218th Street North. 1. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the Comprehensive Plan and general purposes and intent of the official control. The Comprehensive Plan includes goals to protect water and native plant resources by working with property owners and through enforcement of the City's ordinances, including the Shoreland ordinance. The proposed driveway location moves the driveway further away from German Lake and uses an alignment designed to minimize vegetative cutting and is therefore consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan for uses in the General Rural and Shoreland Overlay Districts. 2. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner under the conditions allowed by official control(s). Single-family residences are permitted in the General Rural District and Shoreland District, and driveways provided for that intended use are therefore a reasonable use on the parcel. 3. The practical difficulties are not caused by the landowner, and are unique to the property. The practical difficulties are unique to the property. They include the significant topography on the site and the narrowness of the strip of land that runs between the lake and the wetland to get to the building site. The applicant did not create the practical difficulties. 4. The variance would not alter the essential character of the area. Granting the variance would not alter the character of the area. The proposed driveway minimizes site disturbance on the land and is not visible from adjacent properties, except near the public right-of-way. 5. Economic conditions alone shall not constitute practical difficulties. The practical difficulties are not related to economic conditions alone, but are caused by the topography of the existing parcel and the location of existing water features. 7 Jensen Variance Request Submitted: February 26, 2019 Scandia Planning Commission Page 7 Public Hearing: March 5, 2019 6. The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets, or increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. The proposed driveway will not impair the supply of light or air to adjacent properties or increase congestion, endanger the public, or substantially diminish or impair property values in the neighborhood. 7. The requested variance is the minimum action required to eliminate the practical difficulty. The requested variances provide a route for the driveway that will be least impactful to the natural topography and vegetation on the site, while much more closely meeting the setback from German Lake relative to an existing driveway. 8. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. The variance is not related to a need for direct sunlight for solar energy systems. The findings support granting the variance. ACTION REQUESTED: The Planning Commission should receive public comments at the hearing on March 5, discuss the variance request, and can recommend the following: 1. Approval 2. Approval with conditions 3. Denial with findings 4. Table the request PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: The Planner recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the setback variances from the OHWL of German Lake and from the adjacent wetland to allow the relocation of a driveway on the property. 1. The location of the addition shall be consistent with the plans submitted to the City on January 22, 2019. 2. The applicant shall obtain other permits as required for building a driveway. 3. The applicant shall pay all fees and escrows associated with the variance application. 7 VARIANCE EXHIBIT i I { ,\` Jf f F' 1 5 `� �_� 1 . ' I _ - / —•y • l 144LQFLN'�E 111.371311.37E/�'`,�}. _ -. -II �'-1 f 11 r�•/ / �_u _ ) u�� ijl Y�� 1 11 ,J � �J'�f'J-J�i r rI./'. {�-If r �Y�'r 1Ust+1WcrY.ax1�iHai�"E6sAe�$,� T R F-ERR-a-TNSPFr.R[_ :-lD�- - 4 rQ — ��.\y�Ei��1� "4fl ,�1i1` / ' -- ��P i�•,�\r ��_�y ��__f - �r' ��f'.M ��/g�_d�� -�J �r�.r-%r=�_ �'/ff` r�zs ay"`rr _�~ �"'' � f / ., r.r- Jr rr ! r �X�14�- i� m- `t �4t.�� ' •��' � 1+ Jr/I/ f ')•� w��-- y 1 � 1`1�e4U�"1li:T��c+r+ !,Er!cr1rF�' r a>y1�pmD 1f. t1CIEpprUTUN-4-kit, 32. IvtHIE _ � 11 � 4 rJ --_- - 1,;/ fV/Y . r GERMAN LAKE , ` _ ! ORDINARY HIGH WATER J` rr i �• 4 l ! fIT i,i955.5 (NGVD Z9] r �,• r r .r t I 1 1 F f 1 {.[�t I vl __� 1�I'I � f / f /J4 a•l'� f `z •, � ... � 1 f � l ._ � � �� -- 1 -- �� - r-� j r � l r � r i • I t � ` r� f � - � � � � 1�` i i1 ` a �� j-- .-u iwFa7EP r -r / I Z _ �lTtrf trtle•rae Iq• / -- � � r� I - .'`rTU'Ws� r Y��--}} .p- �V'f�_.[r _fyr i� •�� rr r .I� e_ ! /� -�� f ' t_% a t� �;T� ry` Z /------ �� ., 1 1�>::,.d •r„ -�•'� :r_ A --i1-.-4 +� -irk-- gr-''`•� ,'��,r fir' �� I `[ `-�� fj• r ..' N � 1 ' � rep �1Mnay�,L' -.��- r - 3; � \ 'T• \ , ,:1{ t F f0' � -C.• , I ' - �' l �. �. V � L � 1 � -F1! i r � to _J .- I . I � _��- �. -�-.: - _ r ' �iI.1 . s•Nl- y�ir7, � ]p�' � \ � _-_ y !r / I , �• � \L � - f � 1 �-ao-r� ;•` / ; 7 If _ -.r fri E �� r �• '+; �s 1 1 l % Jf�� •i •r% y 1�.v �� r�•rr`� /��- . I . a ✓<� J�rJ r Q��r{ f / if r �.Y. �� />�.r .'fr� r rnla/Ar^r N�) 'ry �` 1 - / � _r --rte` � �� 'f �,�[�'�.La ,,�.,.i rI r' I rfra �� •'• �-�EnNEn'T[o '� A. ' � I ✓ GERMAN LA I(E 1 f 1 y �i: 1 y' f "it_ ! ' •, • + { l /� _ >�_� -o.lW III � ORDINARY HIGH WATER l / / 955.5 ( GVD 7. ) - -- j � r _ r r N . 9 / �` .SMITH LINE TE4 OF ME iFE'-Y111P1 EAST�WARTER 5tcn is 2Q � Q~ 2� �hnSMP r � M r - I J 1 + 1309.5s...� ! !y�- ijy7 • _ - -,ri - - .f - -.= ' . -- _ No292'1�S*Nf, e�.5£ tfE F• GERMAN I > 1 /jt LR%r 11 -IT> = \� •_•' �� 1 �� J'- - .�rlwW° /I � � r l 1 � �j -} H°.s+STnf l.wr: yr Nn. 96V+�?TEA Cf RIE I ,�.�41 r'A •' ` \ [ fr glfi irYle tx ' l� 1� 1`% mtipfsNw o-�. `7/1 �/�1 t-� ti //l =r }r r / m"y 1� �11��1��1 f ( Iwnfr•r n } [ �f � 11111• yf �nfV�7L ill W1310 1� r 2°09 4 � I � `_ J � � fir_ ��a ��=Y� _�_-�-----J--�----- ND•SB"W \�.��` l.�/�• __WEST LINE OF THE J GN[ �x TK I NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE .nW14_45T WARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF �— -- F f , / f fI !/ • NORTNEAST QUARTER CF 1 SECTION IB, TOWNSHIP 32, ---`-_r --� —`-�ti+f�• r r f � � SELTiN la, TOWMRUP P. 1 RANGE 20 RECEIVED PRRLZZ fk3L]PIPAAY.• [PET Wrrahingtm CQ.,Iy Tut RR ons) NOTES Pdr,`w !: 1. Wetlands were deli... ted by Kjolhoug Environmental Services, Inc. /� 1 r/� 2019 JAN Z U The Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Ouster of Section 1B, Township 32, Range 20, 2. Existing contours ore per MnDnr Lidar mapping. L LO 1 V Washington County, Minnesota, EXCEPT that port plotted as GERMAN LAKE ESTATES, Piz. CITY OF SCANDIA The Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Ouarler of Section 10, Township 32, Range 20, Washington County, Minnesota. .t WALE IN F r 1 w ilr•[Ml a/a A •environmental C�I '� ��/�}� 3690 Pheasant Ridge Gnve NE, Suit¢ too Blaine, MN 55999 I h¢reby certify That this plan, speclRcation Print Name: f Itr I.9 qulst, t•S- or report was prepared by me or under my DRAWN BY: DSM KCM R. ,� ,: BRE NT I E NSE N i j ■ ��rig engineenng Phone: (763)989-7900 dlrectsupervision and that I am a duly Signature:- ISSUE DATE: 1/10/19 16231 Hanson Blvd. SCANDIA SITE VARIANCE EXHIBIT of A/�/"r[ n'�1 11 cii►am survdyinq Fax(763) 989-7959 Licensed Land Survey or Munderinnesota the laws of the State of Minnesota Dale: 1/1W19 License k: 51676 FILE NO: 7720 Andover, MN 55304 I www.carlwnmccain.com I� � r � � � • _ - —� � _�y — - _= 131—�:4fi-- -} I , � � �- _____ — — _�' __ _ }— r � I - , r -r, r rn n i �� ,r '� � EAST LINE OF THE-- J) HE- ! SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE A NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 32, _ I •�.. 1 f f RANGE 2{] `� �"� �• . • ` .vim � � � �' � I ! �/// � � � ` �� _ � � = y .-. �� ' ? r r I / GERMAN LAKE r I- I /'" � ORDINARY G E ON cr � 955.5 (NGVD 29) < Existig nJ ---Driveway as r 1�DELII�IliA7lnC] l , 95�el� locate 1� WETLAND LIME ed -- 4 p `t Ln Overt i r ACV +� 11 , 1 �..._ _� �.. 3 i / '9 �\ _-OW LINA �a t- I ab _f� ! .",c��it 1 �;- { f oil0° ��j rl�r 1 I roposv.rivewbyt {old .�_�` C14fit proposed 4# lvein.k to "I" N-1-96 q Q rn �� J I res�rve exisfing trees�!� x. PROPOSED -� 00 `�- ��. I" T- -SEPTIC, AREALl A o f d � 7 Tll 1 A IA 1^1 eF ♦ ' f tr NATE!•�J1ey1 Z,Ig�'� _� �t 'A _DELINEATED 1 l GERMAN LDELI ot WETLAND LINE I�WLTAN p -LIN �%f -OHW LINE xwA ! _i ORDINARY 111Gk 1 955.5 (NGVD Aflu ALL op AIL Carnelian -Marine -St. Croix Watershed District Permit Application Number 19-003 Applicant: Brent Jensen Consultant: TBD 113XX 218th St. N Scandia, MN 55073 612-770-6681 brent@npainc.net Purpose: Land Disturbance Plan for construction of a new driveway to serve a future single family home riparian to German Lake. Location: 113XX 218th St. N, Scandia, MN. District Rule: 3 & 4 Recommendation: Conditional Approval pending receipt of the following items related to: Stormwater Manaizement For future home only — Stormwater management plan providing stormwater BMPs receiving runoff from the majority of impervious surfaces. Complete the District's Small Residential Project Stormwater Worksheet for sizing of stormwater management feature(s). BMP construction details, installation instructions and protection notes may be incorporated directly or by reference from District guidance (see attached). Erosion & Sediment Control 2. Grading and erosion control plan identifying the placement and specifications of erosion control BMPs. This should include, but may not be limited to a rock construction entrance, silt fence downstream of disturbed areas, revegetation specifications, and a construction implementation schedule. Floodplain 3. For future home only — Specification of the proposed lowest floor elevation to be at least 2 -feet above the 100 -year elevation of German Lake (958.7) and 1 -foot above the natural emergency overflow elevation. Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc. - 1 - 2/20/19 Permit Application No. 19-003 Wetland Mana eg ment Jensen Driveway & Residence, German Lake 4. Copy of wetland delineation report and Notice of Decision for approved wetland boundary. 5. Relocation of the proposed driveway east to at least 75 -feet from the delineated wetland boundary (this appears feasible with a new alignment along shallow slopes. 6. Additional details for the proposed driveway culvert that will serve as the outlet of the Manage 2 wetland on the north boundary of the site. This should include the surveyed elevation of the existing overflow of the wetland, confirmation that the overflow elevation will not be altered, and culvert sizing details. Administrative 7. For future home only — Completion of a draft Buffer Declaration (template attached) in accordance with District Rule 4 (attached) providing a 100 -foot buffer from the OHWL of German Lake (955.5) and 75 -feet from the delineated wetland boundary of the Manage 2 wetland. 8. For future home only — Completion of a draft Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities for access to and maintenance of proposed stormwater features (see attached District template). Stipulations: 1. Contact information for the responsible erosion control contractor/site manager must be provided to the District Administrator prior to initiating work. 2. Notify District Administrator after erosion control is installed but prior to start of construction. 3. All work shall be in accordance with the approved design, plans, computations and specifications on file with the Carnelian -Marine - St. Croix Watershed District and any stipulations identified in this permit. Any proposed revision to grading, drainage, landscaping and erosion control plans shall be submitted to the District for prior approval. Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc. - 2 - 2/20/19 Permit Application No. 19-003 Jensen Driveway & Residence, German Lake 4. Applicant shall not alter or disturb the existing shoreline of German Lake. 5. Applicant is responsible for obtaining all other required permits and approvals for construction of proposed project. 6. Install and maintain silt fence down -gradient from all proposed disturbed soil prior to start of any construction. 7. Upon approval by the District of the draft maintenance agreement and buffer declaration, the documents shall be executed and recorded at the County on the deed. Submit certified copies to the District within 60 days of notice of District approval of draft agreements. 8. Stabilization must be initiated immediately to limit soil erosion on any portion of the site when construction activity has permanently ceased or will not resume for a period exceeding fourteen (14) calendar days. Stabilization must be completed no later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the construction activity in that portion of the site has ceased. Stabilization must be completed no later than twenty-four (24) hours after the construction activity has ceased in that portion of the site within two hundred (200) lineal feet of and draining to a wetland, waterbody, a discernable surface drainage feature or a stormwater system inlet. 9. Notify District Administrator after completion of work for final inspection and return of surety. Exhibits: 1. Permit Application dated 1/22/19, received 1/22/19. 2. Permit Fee ($250) and Surety ($500) received from Brent Jensen, on 1/22/19. 3. Variance Exhibit Survey (1 sheet) prepared by Carlson McCain, last revised 1/18/19, received 1/22/19. 4. Grading Permit Application for the City of Scandia, received 1/22/19. Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc. - 3 - 2/20/19 Permit Application No. 19-003 Jensen Driveway & Residence, German Lake 5. Zoning Variance Application for the City of Scandia, received 1/22/19. Findings: 1. Description — The proposed project entails constructing a new driveway at 113XX 218th St. N, for the purpose of reducing necessary grading and tree removal associated with current site access. This driveway will serve a future new home, details of which have yet to be provided. 2. Stormwater Management — Stormwater management will not be required for construction of the driveway. However, stormwater management will be required for the proposed residence in accordance with the District's Small Residential Project Stormwater Worksheet. 3. Erosion & Sediment Control — A sediment and erosion control plan must be provided and must include a temporary rock construction entrance, silt fencing downstream of disturbed areas, revegetation specifications, and a construction implementation schedule. 4. Buffers — The location of the proposed driveway is within the required 75 -feet buffer of the delineated wetland on the north edge of the parcel. Per District Rule 4.5.2, creation of impervious area is prohibited within this buffer. The District suggests shifting the proposed driveway to the east to avoid the wetland buffer, while still making use of the beneficial topography located at the wetland outlet. As the existing driveway is nonconforming (within the 100 -feet buffer of German Lake), the District would accept locating the new driveway within the lake buffer, provided the existing distance between the lake and driveway is not decreased (which is unlikely). 5. Floodplain — The 100 -yr flood elevation of German Lake is 958.7 (FEMA). The proposed driveway is not within the 100 -yr flood zone. The (future) proposed home lowest floor elevation will need to comply with District freeboard requirements. 6. Wetland Mana eg ment — The proposed plan does not include fill within wetlands, however, a Manage 2 wetland drains east to German Lake over a topographic saddle on which the driveway is proposed. The proposed culvert must not be placed below the existing overflow elevation of the wetland. Additional culvert details are required to verify no indirect wetland impacts. Board Action: The CMSCWD Board conditionally approved this application on Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc. - 4 - 2/20/19 Permit Application No. 19-003 Jensen Driveway & Residence, German Lake February 13th, 2019 pending receipt of the above items. Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc. - 5 - 2/20/19 Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit (LGU) Address City of Scandia 14727 209th St N Scandia, MN 55073 1. PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Name Project Name Date of Application Brent Jensen Jensen 11245 218th St. NE Application Number 07-30-18 2018 -SCA -4 ® Attach site locator map. Type of Decision: ® Wetland Boundary or Type ❑ No -Loss ❑ Exemption ❑ Sequencing ❑ Replacement Plan ❑ Banking Plan 1 ecnnlcal hvaluatlon Panel V InCImQS aria Kecommenclatlon (It ® Approve ❑ Approve with conditions ❑ Deny Summary (or attach): The TEP reviewed the report and delineation onsite on October 12, 2018 and concurs with the boundaries and types. 2. LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT DECISION Date of Decision: 10/16/18 ® Approved ❑ Approved with conditions (include below) ❑ Denied LGU Findings and Conclusions (attach additional sheets as necessary): The 11245 218th Street NE site was inspected on August 3, 2018 for the presence and extent of wetland. The property was located in Section 18, Township 32 North, Range 20 West, Scandia, Washington County, Minnesota. The site was located on 218th Street NE between Manning Trail North to the west and Lofton Avenue North to the east (Figure 1). The property corresponded to Washington County PINS 1803220140003 (11245 218th Street NE — 30.7 acres) and 1803220410001 (address unassigned — 39.66 acres). The site consisted of undeveloped woodland, wetland, and lake (German Lake) habitats. An overhead power line corridor bisected the site from the northwest to the southeast. Three (3) wetlands were delineated within the northern half of the site. Wetlands 1, 3, and the northern edge of Wetland 2 were field delineated using routine methods. The southeast edge of Wetland 2 was delineated using Level 1 methods (desktop delineation). As noted above, the TEP reviewed the site and concurs with the wetland boundaries and types. This approval is valid for 5 years from the date of approval above. BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 1 of 3 For Replacement Plans using credits from the State Wetland Bank: Bank Account # Bank Service Area County Credits Approved for Name Title Jay Riggs, Washington Conservation District Withdrawal (sq. ft. or nearest .01 Signature Date Phone Number and E-mail acre) Replacement Plan Approval Conditions. In addition to any conditions specified by the LGU, the approval of a Wetland Replacement Plan is conditional upon the following: ❑ Financial Assurance: For project -specific replacement that is not in -advance, a financial assurance specified by the LGU must be submitted to the LGU in accordance with MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 (List amount and type in LGU Findings). ❑ Deed Recording: For project -specific replacement, evidence must be provided to the LGU that the BWSR "Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants" and "Consent to Replacement Wetland" forms have been filed with the county recorder's office in which the replacement wetland is located. ❑ Credit Withdrawal: For replacement consisting of wetland bank credits, confirmation that BWSR has withdrawn the credits from the state wetland bank as specified in the approved replacement plan. Wetlands may not be impacted until all applicable conditions have been met! LGU Authorized Signature: Signing and mailing of this completed form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255, Subp. 5 provides notice that a decision was made by the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. If additional details on the decision exist, they have been provided to the landowner and are available from the LGU upon request. Name Title Jay Riggs, Washington Conservation District District Manager Signature Date Phone Number and E-mail 10-16-18 651-330-8220 x20 jriggs@mnwcd.org G THIS DECISION ONLY APPLIES TO THE MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT. Additional approvals or permits from local, state, and federal agencies may be required. Check with all appropriate authorities before commencing work in or near wetlands. Applicants proceed at their own risk if work authorized by this decision is started before the time period for appeal (30 days) has expired. If this decision is reversed or revised under appeal, the applicant may be responsible for restoring or replacing all wetland impacts. This decision is valid for three years from the date of decision unless a longer period is advised by the TEP and specified in this notice of decision. 3. APPEAL OF THIS DECISION Pursuant to MN Rule 8420.0905, any appeal of this decision can only be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal, including applicable fee, within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice to the following as indicated: Check one: ® Appeal of an LGU staff decision. Send ❑ Appeal of LGU governing body decision. Send petition and $ fee (if applicable) to: petition and $500 filing fee to: City of Scandia address above Executive Director Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 2 of 3 4. LIST OF ADDRESSEES ® SWCD TEP member: Jay Riggs ® BWSR TEP member: Ben Meyer ® LGU TEP member (if different than LGU Contact): Neil Soltis, City of Scandia ® DNR TEP member: Becky Horton, Jen Sorensen ❑ DNR Regional Office (if different than DNR TEP member) ® WD or WMO (if applicable): Jim Shaver, CMSCWD ® Applicant and Landowner (if different) ❑ Members of the public who requested notice: ® Corps of Engineers Project Manager ❑ BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator (wetland bank plan decisions only) 5. MAILING INFORMATION ➢For a list of BWSR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.nm.us/aboutbwsr/workareas/WCA_areas.pdf ➢For a list of DNR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/wca/DNR_ TEP_contacts.pdf ➢Department of Natural Resources Regional Offices: NW Region: NE Region: Central Region: Southern Region: Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources Div. Ecol. Resources Div. Ecol. Resources Div. Ecol. Resources 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd. 1201 E. Hwy. 2 1200 Warner Road 261 Hwy. 15 South NE Grand Rapids, MN 55744 St. Paul, MN 55106 New Ulm, MN 56073 Bemidji, MN 56601 For a map of DNR Administrative Regions, see: http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/aboutdnr/dnr_regions.pdf ➢For a list of Corps of Project Managers: www.Mvp.usace.g my.mil/re ulatory/default.asp?pageid=687 or send to: US Army Corps of Engineers St. Paul District, ATTN: OP -R 180 Fifth St. East, Suite 700 St. Paul, MN 55101-1678 ➢For Wetland Bank Plan applications, also send a copy of the application to: Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 6. ATTACHMENTS In addition to the site locator map, list any other attachments: El BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 3 of 3 11245218 1h St. NE Scandia, Washington County, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report Prepared for Brent Jensen by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. (KES Project No. 2018-095) September 19, 2018 11245218 1h St. NE Scandia, Washington County, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page 1. WETLAND DELINEATION SUMMARY.........................................................................1 2. OVERVIEW........................................................................................................................... 2 3. METHODS............................................................................................................................. 2 3.1 Wetland Delineation.......................................................................................................... 2 4. RESULTS............................................................................................................................... 3 4.1 Review of NWI, Soils, Public Waters and NHD Information .......................................... 3 4.2 Wetland Determinations and Delineations........................................................................ 4 4.3 Other Areas....................................................................................................................... 5 4.5 Request for Wetland Boundary and Jurisdictional Determination ................................... 5 5. CERTIFICATION OF DELINEATION............................................................................. 6 TABLES Table 1. Wetlands delineated on the 11245 218th St. NE site ................................................ 1 Table 2. Soil types mapped on the 11245 218th St. NE site ................................................... 3 Table 3. Summary of Delineated Wetlands on the 11245 218th St. NE site.....................5 FIGURES 1. Site Location 2. Existing Conditions 3. National Wetlands Inventory 4. Soil Survey 5. DNR Public Waters Inventory 6. National Hydrography Dataset APPENDICES A. Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota B. Wetland Delineation Data Forms C. Precipitation Data 11245 281th St. NE Scandia, Washington County, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report 1. WETLAND DELINEATION SUMMARY • The northern half of the 11245 2181h St. NE site was inspected on August 3, 2018 for the presence and extent of wetland. The southern half of the site will not be developed at this time and was therefore not investigated. • The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map showed two PEM 1 A, one PEM 1 C/PSS 1 C, one PEM 1 C, and one L2EM2G/L2ABH/PEM 1 F/PEM2G/PEM 1 C/PEM 1 B/PEM 1 A wetland complex within site boundaries. • The soil survey showed the hydric soil type within site boundaries included Cathro muck, Isanti, and Aquolls and Histosols, ponded. • The DNR Public Waters Inventory showed one DNR Public Water (82-56P — German Lake) within site boundaries. • The National Hydrography Dataset showed one Lake/Pond surface water feature within site boundaries. • Three (3) wetlands were delineated within the northern half of the site as summarized in Table 1 below. Table 1. Wetlands delineated on the 11245 218th St. NE site Wetland Wetland Type Dominant Vegetation ID Circular 39 Cowardin Eggers and Reed 1 Type 3 PEMC Shallow marsh Cattail, lake sedge, arrowhead L2ABH/PEMF/ Deepwater habitat, deep Water, cattail, sedges, purple 2 Type 4/5 L2EM2G/ PEMC/PEMB/ marsh, shallow marsh, and loosestrife, woolgrass, reed PEM 1 A wet meadow canary grass Shallow marsh and scrub- Cattail, arrowhead, woolgrass, 3 Type 3/6 PEMC/PSS1C shrub wetland reed canary grass, glossy buckthorn, alder 11245 2181h St. NE, Scandia 2. OVERVIEW Wetland Delineation Report The 11245 218' Street NE site was inspected on August 3, 2018 for the presence and extent of wetland. The property was located in Section 18, Township 32 North, Range 20 West, Scandia, Washington County, Minnesota. The site was located on 218th Street NE between Manning Trail North to the west and Lofton Avenue North to the east (Figure 1). The property corresponded to Washington County PINS 1803220140003 (11245 218th Street NE — 30.7 acres) and 1803220410001 (address unassigned — 39.66 acres). The site consisted of undeveloped woodland, wetland, and lake (German Lake) habitats. An overhead power line corridor bisected the site from the northwest to the southeast. Three (3) wetlands were delineated within the northern half of the site. Wetlands 1, 3, and the northern edge of Wetland 2 were field delineated using routine methods. The southeast edge of Wetland 2 was delineated using Level 1 methods (desktop delineation). Delineated wetland boundaries and existing conditions are shown on Figure 2. A single-family home is proposed in the northern portion of the site. No development is currently proposed in the south portion of the site; therefore, wetlands in the south portion were not delineated. The NWI map (Figure 3) appears to fairly accurately represent wetland in the south half of the site. Appendix A of this report includes a Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota, which is submitted in request for: (1) a wetland boundary and type determination under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA), and (2) delineation concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act. 3. METHODS 3.1 Wetland Delineation Wetlands were identified using the Routine Determination method described in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Waterways Experiment Station, 1987) and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Northcentral and Notheast Region (Version 2.0) as required under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Wetland boundaries were identified as the upper -most extent of wetland that met criteria for hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and wetland hydrology. Wetland -upland boundaries were marked with pin flags that will be located by Carlson McCain surveyors after the delineation has been reviewed by the regulators. Boundaries shown on Figure 2 do not represent an official survey. Soils, vegetation, and hydrology were documented at a representative location along the wetland - upland boundary. Plant species dominance was estimated based on the percent aerial or basal 11245 2181h St. NE, Scandia Wetland Delineation Report coverage visually estimated within a 30 -foot radius for trees and vines, a 15 -foot radius for the shrub layer, and a 5 -foot radius for the herbaceous layer within the community type sampled. Soils were characterized to a minimum depth of 24 inches (unless otherwise noted) using a Munsell Soil Color Book and standard soil texturing methodology. Hydric soil indicators used are from Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils, Version 8.1, 2017). Mapped soils are separated into five classes based on the composition of hydric components and the Hydric Rating by Map Unit color classes utilized on Web Soil Survey. The five classes include Hydric (100 percent hydric components), Predominantly Hydric (66 to 99 percent hydric components), Partially Hydric (33 to 65 percent hydric components), Predominantly Non -Hydric (1 to 32 percent hydric components), and Non -Hydric (less than one percent hydric components). Plants were identified using standard regional plant keys. Taxonomy and indicator status of plant species was taken from the 2016 National Wetland Plant List (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2016. National Wetland Plant List, version 3.3, Engineer Research and Development Center, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH). 4. RESULTS 4.1 Review of NWI, Soils, Public Waters and NHD Information The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) (Minnesota Geospatial Commons 2009-2014 and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) showed two PEM1A, one PEM1C/PSS1C, one PEM1C, and one L2EM2G/L2ABH/PEM 1 F/PEM2G/PEM 1 C/PEM 1 B/PEM 1 A wetland complex within site boundaries (Figure 3). The Soil Survey (USDA NRCS 2015) showed the hydric soil types on or adjacent to the property included Cathro muck, Isanti, and Aquolls and Histosols, ponded. Soil types mapped within site boundaries are listed in Table 2 and a map showing soil types is included in Figure 4. Table 2. Soil types mapped on the 11245 218' St. NE site Symbol Soil Name Acres % of oda Hydric Hydric Category Area 49C Antigo silt loam, 6 to 15 percent 10.1 13.20% 0 Non -Hydric slopes 120 Brill silt loam 1.7 2.30% 5 Predominantly Non - Hydric 155B Chetek sandy loam, 0 to 6 0 0.00% 0 Predominantly Non - percent slopes Hydric 161 Isanti loamy fine sand, 1.7 2.20% 92 Predominantly Hydric de ressional 166 Ronneby fine sandy loam 1.8 2.40% 5 Predominantly Non - Hydric 11245 2181h St. NE, Scandia Table 2. Soil types mapped on the 11245 218t' St. NE site Wetland Delineation Report Symbol Soil Name Acres % of % Hydric Hydric Category Area 302B Rosholt sandy loam, 2 to 6 0.4 0.50% 0 Non -Hydric percent slopes 367B Campia silt loam, 0 to 8 percent 11.1 14.60% 2 Predominantly Non - slopes Hydric 453C DeMontreville loamy fine sand, 3.2 4.20% 3 Predominantly Non - 6 to 12 percent slopes Hydric 454B Mahtomedi loamy sand, 0 to 6 8.7 11.50% 0 Non -Hydric percent slopes 454C Mahtomedi loamy sand, 6 to 12 0 0.00% 0 Non -Hydric percent slopes 504C Duluth silt loam, 6 to 12 percent 0.7 0.90% 3 Predominantly Non - slopes Hydric 507 Poskin silt loam 4 5.20% 3 Predominantly Non - Hydric 544 Cathro muck 2.2 2.90% 97 Predominantly Hydric 1055 Aquolls and Histosols, ponded 5.2 6.80% 100 Hydric W Water 25.2 33.00% 0 Non -Hydric The Minnesota DNR Public Waters Inventory (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 2015) showed one DNR Public Water (82-56P — German Lake) within site boundaries (Figure 5). The National H, dy rography Dataset (U.S. Geological Survey 2015) showed one Lake/Pond surface water feature within site boundaries (Figure 6). 4.2 Wetland Determinations and Delineations Potential wetlands were evaluated during field observations on August 3, 2018. Three (3) wetlands were identified and delineated on the property (Figure 2). Corresponding data forms are included in Appendix B. The following description of the wetlands and their adjacent upland reflects conditions observed at the time of the field visit. Tree and shrubs had leaves, herbaceous vegetation was actively growing. Climatic conditions were typical (normal) based on the gridded database method (3 -month antecedent precipitation) (Appendix C) and field observations. Delineated wetlands within the review area are summarized in Table 3 on the following page. No development is currently proposed in the south portion of the site; therefore, wetlands in the south portion were not delineated. The NWI map (Figure 3) appears to fairly accurately represent wetland in the south half of the site. 4 11245 2181h St. NE, Scandia Wetland Delineation Report Table 3. Summary of Delineated Wetlands on the 11245 218th St. NE site. Wetland ID Wetland 1 Wetland 2 Wetland 3 Wetland Area (ac) 0.07 ac 12.97 ac within review area 1.12 ac Circular 39 Type 3 Type 4/5 Type 3/6 Cowardin PEMC L2ABH/PABG/L2EM2G/ PEMC/PSS1C PEMC/PEMB/PEM 1 A Eggers and Reed Shallow marsh Deepwater habitat, deep marsh, Shallow marsh and scrub - shallow marsh, and wet meadow shrub wetland Water, cattail, sedges, purple Cattail, arrowhead, Dominant Cattail, lake sedge, woolgrass, reed woolgrass, reed canary Vegetation arrowhead grass, glossy buckthorn, canaloosery canary grass alder Observed Standing water and soil Hydrology Inundated with —6" water saturation at wetland edge. Interior of wetland Indicator Interior inundated with 3-5' of inundated with 6" water. water Mapped NWI L2ABH/PABG/ Wetland None L2EM2G/PEMC/ PEM1C/PSS1C PEMB/PEM 1 A Mapped Soil Series Campia Water, Cathro muck, Mahtomedi Cathro muck loamy sand Observed Drainage None; isolated basin Unknown; wetland extends None; isolated basin Features surrounded by upland. offsite to west surrounded by upland. Adjacent Upland Ironwood, red oak, red Paper birch, red oak, green ash, Paper birch, red oak, green Vegetation maple, common buckthorn, white oak, red maple, ash, white oak, red maple, Pennsylvania sedge, aster serviceberry, prickly ash serviceberry, prickly ash Comments -- -- -- 4.3 Other Areas No other depressional areas with hydrophytic vegetation or wetland hydrology were observed within site boundaries. No other areas were shown as hydric soil on the soil survey or as wetland on the NWI map. 4.5 Request for Wetland Boundary and Jurisdictional Determination Appendix A of this report includes a Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota, which is submitted in request for: (1) a wetland boundary and type determination under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA), and (2) delineation concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act. 11245 2181h St. NE, Scandia Wetland Delineation Report 5. CERTIFICATION OF DELINEATION The procedures utilized in the described delineation are based on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual as required under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. This wetland delineation and report were prepared in compliance with the regulatory standards in place at the time the work was performed. Site boundaries indicated on figures within this report are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Delineation completed by: Andrew Krinke, Ecologist/GIS Specialist Minnesota Certified Wetland Delineator No. 1309 Report prepared by: Melissa Lauterbach-Barrett, Wetland Specialist Minnesota Certified Wetland Delineator No. 1085 Report reviewed by: Date: September 14, 2018 Mark Kjolhaug, Professional Wetland Scientist No. 000845 6 11245 218" Street NE Wetland Delineation Report FIGURES 1. Site Location 2. Existing Conditions 3. National Wetlands Inventory 4. Soil Survey 5. DNR Protected Waters Inventory 6. National Hydrography Dataset Figure 1 - Site Location N 0 1,000 11245 218th Street (KES 2018-095) I Feet Scandia, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated �(' �1 T u A TI r on this figure are approximate 1 LJIJi HA G F.NVJRONMF.NTA1. SF.RVI C ES COMPANY and do not constitute an official survey product. -ter Source: ESRI Streets Basemap s i 21@h Strep NortF k r 11245 2181h St - PIN 1803220140003 30.70 -ac «n No address PIN 1803220410001 39.66 -ac 213`F.te1� qH f mr497.}iandW-iY-af�i315-- T Legend LSite Boundary © OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC -BY -SA Figure 1 - Site Location N 0 1,000 11245 218th Street (KES 2018-095) I Feet Scandia, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated �(' �1 T u A TI r on this figure are approximate 1 LJIJi HA G F.NVJRONMF.NTA1. SF.RVI C ES COMPANY and do not constitute an official survey product. -ter Source: ESRI Streets Basemap A Figure 2 - Existing Conditions (2017 FSA Photo) I 500 6==w====J Feet KjoLHAuGF.NVJRONMF.NTA1. SF. RVI CES COMPANt`Y Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons 11245 218th Street (KES 2018-095) Scandia, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. A Figure 3 - National Wetlands Inventory X 500 6==z====J Feet KjoLHAuGF.NVJRONMF.NTA1. SF. RVI CES COMPANt`Y Source: Minnesota DNR (2013), USFWS 11245 218th Street (KES 2018-095) Scandia, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. 49B 540 1 E, Ills] 155C Legend Site Boundary - Hydric/Predominantly Hydric Partially Hydric Predominantly Non-Hydric/Non-Hydric II=542l.':026 [ 3028 1847 1 302B� 3r 604C_ : 544 543 ` #4 544 367B 49C 454B W r= 454B' ' _ e 155B 453C 507 #' 1-61 120 \%. - i.. .-- 166 1055 r 507 454C Figure 4 - Soil Survey N 0 500 11245 218th Street (KES 2018-095) Feet Scandia, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated �(' �1 T u A TI r on this figure are approximate 1 LJIJi HA G RNWRONMF.NTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an Source: USDA, NRCS official survey product. -ter Figure 5 - DNR Public Waters Inventory N 0 500 Feet KjoLHAuGF.NVJRONMF.NTA1. SF. RVI CES COMPA NY -ter Source. Minnesota DNR 11245 218th Street (KES 2018-095) Scandia, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. tel• . - . �� a fl TA p -ire OAF 11ti.. L' Y r r A = r r / Site Boundary ' s o Hydro Junction �s i ArtificialPath - F CanalDitch I. � ��y: • _�f Connector Pipeline StreamRiver r Dam/Weir r Stream/River Lake/Pond Figure 6 - National Hydrography Dataset N 0 500 11245 218th Street (KES 2018-095) I I Feet Scandia, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated Kr u T/ r on this figure are approximate joL AVG RNWRONMF.NTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an Source: USGS official survey product. -ter 11245 218" Street NE Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX A Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota Project Name and/or Number: 11245 218th St. NE, Scandia KES#2018-095 PART ONE: Applicant Information If applicant is an entity (company, government entity, partnership, etc.), an authorized contact person must be identified. If the applicant is using an agent (consultant, lawyer, or other third party) and has authorized them to act on their behalf, the agent's contact information must also be provided. Applicant/Landowner Name: Brent Jensen Mailing Address: 16231 Hanson Blvd NW, Andover, MN 55304 Phone: 612-770-6681 E-mail Address: brent@npainc.net Authorized Contact (do not complete if same as above): Mailing Address: Phone: E-mail Address: Agent Name: Melissa Barrett, Kjolhaug Environmental Mailing Address: 2500 Shadywood Road, Suite 130, Orono, MN 55331 Phone: 952-401-8757 E-mail Address: melissa@kjolhaugenv.com PART TWO: Site Location Information County: Washington City/Township: Scandia Parcel ID and/or Address: 1803220140003, 183220410001 Legal Description (Section, Township, Range): Sec 18, T32, R20 Lat/Long (decimal degrees): 45°15'40.20"N, 92°52'39.05"W Attach a map showing the location of the site in relation to local streets, roads, highways. Approximate size of site (acres) or if a linear project, length (feet): 70.36 -acres If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you must provide the names and addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to your application or by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at: http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Portals/57/docs/regulatory/RegulatoryDocs/engform 4345 2012oct.pdf PART THREE: General Project/Site Information If this application is related to a delineation approval, exemption determination, jurisdictional determination, or other correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number. Describe the project that is being proposed, the project purpose and need, and schedule for implementation and completion. The project description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements that effect aquatic resources (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings showing the location, character, and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts. Application is for delineation review/concurrence. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 3 of 11 Project Name and/or Number: 11245 218th St. NE, Scandia KES#2018-095 If your proposed project involves a direct or indirect impact to an aquatic resource (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) identify each impact in the table below. Include all anticipated impacts, including those expected to be temporary, Attach an overhead view map, aerial photo, and/or drawing showing all of the aquatic resources in the project area and the location(s) of the proposed impacts. Label each aquatic resource on the map with a reference number or letter and identify the impacts in the following table. Aquatic Aquatic Resource Resource Type (wetland, lake, ID (as noted on tributary etc.) overhead view) Type of Impact (fill, excavate, drain, or remove vegetation) Duration of Impact Overall Size of Permanent (P) Size of Impact' Aquatic or Temporary Resource s (T)1 Existing Plant Community Type(s) in Impact Area' County, Major Watershed #, and Bank Service Area # of Impact Areas 'If impacts are temporary; enter the duration of the impacts in days next to the `T". For example, a project with a temporary access fill that would be removed after 220 days would be entered "T (220)". 'Impacts less than 0.01 acre should be reported in square feet. Impacts 0.01 acre or greater should be reported as acres and rounded to the nearest 0.01 acre. Tributary impacts must be reported in linear feet of impact and an area of impact by indicating first the linear feet of impact along the flowline of the stream followed by the area impact in parentheses). For example, a project that impacts 50 feet of a stream that is 6 feet wide would be reported as 50 ft (300 square feet). ;This is generally only applicable if you are applying for a de minimis exemption under MN Rules 8420.0420 Subp. 8, otherwise enter "N/A". ^Use Wetland Plants and Plant Community Types of Minnesota and Wisconsin V Ed. as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp. 2. SRefer to Major Watershed and Bank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp. 7. If any of the above identified impacts have already occurred, identify which impacts they are and the circumstances associated with each: ❑ Check here if you are requesting a pre -application consultation with the Corps and CGU based on the information you have provided. Regulatory entities will not initiate a formal application review if this box is checked. By signature below, I attest that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further attest that I possess the authority to undertake the work escribed herein. Signature: , >/ / Date: I hereby authorize/ to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish upon request, supplemental information in support of this application. ' The term "impact" as used in this joint application form is a generic term used for disclosure purposes to identify activities that may require approval from one or more regulatory agencies. For purposes of this form it is not meant to indicate whether or not those activities may require mitigation/replacement. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 4 of 11 Project Name and/or Number: 11245 218th St. NE, Scandia KES#2018-095 Attachment A Request for Delineation Review, Wetland Type Determination, or Jurisdictional Determination By submission of the enclosed wetland delineation report, I am requesting that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District (Corps) and/or the Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit (LGU) provide me with the following (check all that apply): ® Wetland Type Confirmation ® Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with a delineation is a written notification from the Corps and a decision from the LGU concurring, not concurring, or commenting on the boundaries of the aquatic resources delineated on the property. Delineation concurrences are generally valid for five years unless site conditions change. Under this request alone, the Corps will not address the jurisdictional status of the aquatic resources on the property, only the boundaries of the resources within the review area (including wetlands, tributaries, lakes, etc.). ❑ Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination. A preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) is a non-binding written indication from the Corps that waters, including wetlands, identified on a parcel may be waters of the United States. For purposes of computation of impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements, a permit decision made on the basis of a PJD will treat all waters and wetlands in the review area as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. PJDs are advisory in nature and may not be appealed. ❑ Approved Jurisdictional Determination. An approved jurisdictional determination (AJD) is an official Corps determination that jurisdictional waters of the United States are either present or absent on the property. AJDs can generally be relied upon by the affected party for five years. An AJD may be appealed through the Corps administrative appeal process. In order for the Corps and LGU to process your request, the wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual, and the Guidelines for Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota (2013). http://www.mvp.usace.armV.mil/Missions/Regulatory/DelineationJDGuidance.aspx Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 5 of 11 11245 218" Street NE Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX B Wetland Delineation Data Forms WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: 11245 218th St NE City/County: Scandia/Washingto Sampling Date: 8/3/2018 Applicant/Owner: Brent Jensen State: MN Sampling Point: SP1-upl Investigator(s): A. Krinke Section, Township, Range: Sec 18, T32, R20 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): linear Slope (%): 2-8 Lat.: Long.: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Campia silt loam NWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? circumstances" present? Yes (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Hydric soil present? N Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N If yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Climatic conditions typical (normal) based on gridded database method. HYDROLOGY US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Secondary Indicators (minimum of two Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) required) _ Surface Water (Al) —Water -Stained Leaves (139) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) _Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) —Saturation (A3) —Marl Deposits (1315) —Moss Trim Lines (B16) —Water Marks (B1) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) —Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living —Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Roots (C3) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery —Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ (C9) Iron Deposits (135) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial (C6) —Stunted Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Imagery (137) —Soils _Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ —Shallow Aquitard (D3) Sparsely Vegetated Concave —Other (Explain in Remarks) X FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Surface (138) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Indicators of Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology (includes capillary fringe) present? N Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Dry to 24 inches. US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region VEGETATION - Use sclentltic names of plants Sampling Point: SP1-upl 50/20 Thresholds Absolute Dominant Indicator 20% 50% Tree Stratum Plot Size ( 30 ) Cover Species Status Tree Stratum 0 0 1 Sapling/Shrub Stratum 0 0 2 Herb Stratum 17 43 3 Woody Vine Stratum 0 0 4 5 Dominance Test Worksheet 6 Number of Dominant 7 Species that are OBL, 8 FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 9 Total Number of Dominant 10 Species Across all Strata: 3 (B) 0 = Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, Sapling/Shrub Absolute Dominant Indicator FACW, or FAC: 66.67% (A/B) Stratum Plot Size ( 15 ) % Cover Species Status 1 Prevalence Index Worksheet 2 Total % Cover of: 3 OBL species 0 x 1= 0 4 FACW species 55 x2= 110 5 FAC species 15 x3= 45 6 FACU species 15 x4= 60 7 UPL species 0 x5= 0 8 Column totals 85 (A) 215 (B) 9 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.53 10 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Herb Stratum Plot Size ( 5 ) Absolute Dominant Indicator _ Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation Cover Species Status X Dominance test is >50% 1 Phalaris arundinacea 40 Y FACW X Prevalence index is <_3.0* 2 Cirsium arvense 10 Y FACU Morphological adaptations* (provide 3 So/idago gigantea 10 Y FACW supporting data in Remarks or on a 4 Barbarea vulgaris 5 N FAC sheet) 5 Parthenocissus quinquefolia 5 N FACU —separate Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 6 Rubus idaeus 5 N FAC (explain) 7 Comus racemosa 5 N FAC _ "Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 8 Onoclea sensibilis 5 N FACW present, unless disturbed or problematic 9 10 Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 11 12 Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. 13 14 Sapling/shrub- Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and 15 greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. 85 = Total Cover Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of Woody Vine Absolute Dominant Indicator size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Stratum Plot Size ( 30 ) % Cover Species P Status Woody vines -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 1 height. 2 3 4 Hydrophytic 5 vegetation 0 = Total Cover present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP1-upl Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc*' Texture Remarks 0-4 10YR 3/2 100 silt loam 4-24 10YR 4/3 100 silt loam `Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains "Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: _ Histosol (Al) Polyvalue Below Surface 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ (S8) (LRR R, MLRA 1498) —Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) —Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) —Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ (LRR R, MLRA 1498 _ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L _Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;_ (LRR K, L) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) —Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 1498) —Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145,149B) —Sandy Redox (S5) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) —Red Parent Material (F21) —Stripped Matrix (S6) —Redox Depressions (F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA —Other (Explain in Remarks) _ 149B) *Incators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic di Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric soil present? N Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: 11245 218th St NE City/County: Scandia/Washingto Sampling Date: 8/3/2018 Applicant/Owner: Brent Jensen State: MN Sampling Point: SP1 -wet Investigator(s): A. Krinke Section, Township, Range: Sec 18, T32, R20 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1 Lat.: Long.: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Campia silt loam NWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? circumstances" present? (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Yes Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Hydric soil present? Y Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y If yes, optional wetland site ID: Wetland 1 Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Climatic conditions typical (normal) based on gridded database method. HYDROLOGY US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Secondary Indicators (minimum of two Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) required) X Surface Water (Al) —Water -Stained Leaves (139) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) _Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) —Saturation (A3) —Marl Deposits (1315) —Moss Trim Lines (B16) —Water Marks (B1) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) —Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living —Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Roots (C3) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery —Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ (C9) Iron Deposits (135) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial (C6) _ X Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Imagery (137) —Soils _Thin Muck Surface (C7) —Shallow Aquitard (D3) Sparsely Vegetated Concave —Other (Explain in Remarks) X FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Surface (138) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes X No Depth (inches): see below Indicators of Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology (includes capillary fringe) present? Y Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Center of depression inudated with —6 inches of water. US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region V Clot I A I Ivry - Use SGIeFILil IG names of plains Sampling Point: SF—i-wet 50/20 Thresholds Absolute Dominant Indicator 20% 50% Tree Stratum Plot Size ( 30 ) Cover Species Status Tree Stratum 0 0 1 Sapling/Shrub Stratum 0 0 2 Herb Stratum 20 50 3 Woody Vine Stratum 0 0 4 5 Dominance Test Worksheet 6 Number of Dominant 7 Species that are OBL, 8 FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) 9 Total Number of Dominant 10 Species Across all Strata: 3 (B) 0 = Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, Sapling/Shrub Absolute Dominant Indicator FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) Stratum Plot Size ( 15 ) % Cover Species Status 1 Prevalence Index Worksheet 2 Total % Cover of: 3 OBL species 60 x 1 = 60 4 FACW species 30 x2= 60 5 FAC species 0 x3= 0 6 FACU species 10 x4= 40 7 UPL species 0 X5= 0 8 Column totals 100 (A) 160 (B) 9 Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.60 10 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Herb Stratum Plot Size ( 5 ) Absolute Dominant Indicator _ Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation Cover Species Status X Dominance test is >50% 1 Typha x glauca 30 Y OBL X Prevalence index is <_3.0* 2 Sagittaria latifolia 30 Y OBL Morphological adaptations* (provide 3 Phalaris arundinacea 20 Y FACW supporting data in Remarks or on a 4 Solanum ptychanthum 10 N FACU sheet) 5 Impatiens capensis 10 N FACW _separate Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 6 (explain) 7 _ "Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 8 present, unless disturbed or problematic 9 10 Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 11 12 Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. 13 14 Sapling/shrub- Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and 15 greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. 100 = Total Cover Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of Woody Vine Absolute Dominant Indicator size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Stratum Plot Size ( 30 ) % Cover Species P Status Woody vines -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 1 height. 2 3 4 Hydrophytic 5 vegetation 0 = Total Cover present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP1 -wet Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc*' Texture Remarks 0-4 10YR 2/1 100 silt loam 4-24 10YR 5/1 90 10YR 4/6 10 C M silt loam `Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains "Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: _ Histosol (Al) Polyvalue Below Surface 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ (S8) (LRR R, MLRA 1498) —Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) —Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) —Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ (LRR R, MLRA 1498 _ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L _Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;_ (LRR K, L) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) —Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 1498) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145,149B) X Sandy Redox (S5) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) —Red Parent Material (F21) —Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Redox Depressions (F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA —Other (Explain in Remarks) _ 149B) *Incators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic di Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric soil present? Y Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: 11245 218th St NE City/County: Scandia/Washingto Sampling Date: 8/3/2018 Applicant/Owner: Brent Jensen State: MN Sampling Point: SP2-1-upl Investigator(s): A. Krinke Section, Township, Range: Sec 18, T32, R20 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): linear Slope (%): 2-10 Lat.: Long.: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Campia silt loam NWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? circumstances" present? Yes (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Hydric soil present? N Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N If yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Climatic conditions typical (normal) based on gridded database method. HYDROLOGY US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Secondary Indicators (minimum of two Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) required) _ Surface Water (Al) —Water -Stained Leaves (139) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) _Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) —Saturation (A3) —Marl Deposits (1315) —Moss Trim Lines (B16) —Water Marks (B1) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) —Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living —Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Roots (C3) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery —Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ (C9) Iron Deposits (135) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial (C6) —Stunted Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Imagery (137) —Soils _Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ —Shallow Aquitard (D3) Sparsely Vegetated Concave —Other (Explain in Remarks) _ FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Surface (138) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Indicators of Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology (includes capillary fringe) present? N Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Dry to 24 inches. US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region VEGETATION - Use sclentltic names of plants Sampling Point: SP2-1-upl 50/20 Thresholds Absolute Dominant Indicator 20% 50% Tree Stratum Plot Size ( 30 ) Cover Species Status Tree Stratum 14 35 1 Quercus rubra 30 Y FACU Sapling/Shrub Stratum 5 13 2 Betula papyrifera 20 Y FACU Herb Stratum 12 30 3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10 N FACW Woody Vine Stratum 0 0 4 Quercus alba 10 N FACU 5 Dominance Test Worksheet 6 Number of Dominant 7 Species that are OBL, 8 FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 9 Total Number of Dominant 10 Species Across all Strata: 6 (B) 70 = Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, Sapling/Shrub Absolute Dominant Indicator FACW, or FAC: 33.33% (A/B) Plot Size ( 15 ) Stratum % Cover Species Status Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Zanthoxylum americanum 15 Y FACU 2 Acer rubrum 10 Y FAC Total % Cover of: 3 OBL species 0 x 1= 0 4 FACW species 10 x2= 20 5 FAC species 40 x3= 120 6 FACU species 85 x4= 340 7 UPL species 20 x5= 100 8 Column totals 155 (A) 580 (B) 9 Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.74 10 25 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Herb Stratum Plot Size ( 5 ) Absolute Dominant Indicator _ Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation % Cover Species Status Dominance test is >50% 1 Carex pensylvanica 20 Y UPL _ Prevalence index is <_3.0* 2 Amphicarpaea bracteata 20 Y FAC _ Morphological adaptations* (provide 3 Parthenocissus quinquefolia 10 N FACU supporting data in Remarks or on a 4 Rubus idaeus 10 N FAC sheet) 5 —separate Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 6 (explain) 7 _ "Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 8 present, unless disturbed or problematic 9 10 Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 11 12 Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. 13 14 Sapling/shrub- Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and 15 greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. 60 = Total Cover Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of Woody Vine Absolute Dominant Indicator size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Stratum Plot Size ( 30 ) % Cover Species P Status Woody vines -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 1 height. 2 3 4 Hydrophytic 5 vegetation 0 = Total Cover present? N Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP2-1-upl Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc*' Texture Remarks 0-11 10YR 2/1 100 silt loam 11-24 10YR 4/3 100 silt loam `Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains "Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: _ Histosol (Al) Polyvalue Below Surface 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ (S8) (LRR R, MLRA 1498) —Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) —Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) —Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ (LRR R, MLRA 1498 _ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L _Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;_ (LRR K, L) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) —Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 1498) —Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145,149B) —Sandy Redox (S5) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) —Red Parent Material (F21) —Stripped Matrix (S6) —Redox Depressions (F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA —Other (Explain in Remarks) _ 149B) *Incators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic di Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric soil present? N Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: 11245 218th St NE City/County: Scandia/Washingto Sampling Date: 8/3/2018 Applicant/Owner: Brent Jensen State: MN Sampling Point: SP2-1-wet Investigator(s): A. Krinke Section, Township, Range: Sec 18, T32, R20 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1 Lat.: Long.: Datum: Soil Map Unit Nam(Cathro NWI Classification: PEM1C Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? circumstances" present? (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Yes Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Hydric soil present? Y Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y If yes, optional wetland site ID: Wetland 2 Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Climatic conditions typical (normal) based on gridded database method. HYDROLOGY US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Secondary Indicators (minimum of two Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) required) X Surface Water (Al) —Water -Stained Leaves (139) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) _Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) —Saturation (A3) —Marl Deposits (1315) —Moss Trim Lines (B16) —Water Marks (B1) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) —Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living —Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Roots (C3) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery —Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ (C9) Iron Deposits (135) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial (C6) _ X Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Imagery (137) —Soils _Thin Muck Surface (C7) —Shallow Aquitard (D3) Sparsely Vegetated Concave —Other (Explain in Remarks) X FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Surface (138) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes X No Depth (inches): see notes Indicators of Water table present? Yes X No Depth (inches): see notes wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): see notes hydrology (includes capillary fringe) present? Y Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: 3 inches of standing water at wetland edge; 3 to 5 feet of standing water within interior of wetland/deepwater habitat. US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region V Clot I A I Ivry - Use SGIeFILil IG names of plains Sampling Point: JF'z-1-wet 50/20 Thresholds Absolute Dominant Indicator 20% 50% Tree Stratum Plot Size ( 30 ) Cover Species Status Tree Stratum 0 0 1 Sapling/Shrub Stratum 0 0 2 Herb Stratum 14 35 3 Woody Vine Stratum 0 0 4 5 Dominance Test Worksheet 6 Number of Dominant 7 Species that are OBL, 8 FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 9 Total Number of Dominant 10 Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) 0 = Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, Sapling/Shrub Absolute Dominant Indicator FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) Stratum Plot Size ( 15 ) % Cover Species Status 1 Prevalence Index Worksheet 2 Total % Cover of: 3 OBL species 0 x 1= 0 4 FACW species 70 x2= 140 5 FAC species 0 x3= 0 6 FACU species 0 x4= 0 7 UPL species 0 X5= 0 8 Column totals 70 (A) 140 (B) 9 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.00 10 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Herb Stratum Plot Size ( 5 ) Absolute Dominant Indicator _ Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation Cover Species Status X Dominance test is >50% 1 Phalaris arundinacea 70 Y FACW X Prevalence index is <_3.0* 2 Morphological adaptations* (provide 3 supporting data in Remarks or on a 4 sheet) 5 —separate Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 6 (explain) 7 _ "Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 8 present, unless disturbed or problematic 9 10 Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 11 12 Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. 13 14 Sapling/shrub- Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and 15 greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. 70 = Total Cover Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of Woody Vine Absolute Dominant Indicator size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Stratum Plot Size ( 30 ) % Cover Species P Status Woody vines -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 1 height. 2 3 4 Hydrophytic 5 vegetation 0 = Total Cover present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP2-1-wet Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc*' Texture Remarks 0-16 N 2.5/ 100 muck `Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains "Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: X Histosol (Al) Polyvalue Below Surface 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ (S8) (LRR R, MLRA 1498) —Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) —Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) —Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ (LRR R, MLRA 1498 _ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L _Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;_ (LRR K, L) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) —Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 1498) —Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145,149B) —Sandy Redox (S5) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) —Red Parent Material (F21) —Stripped Matrix (S6) —Redox Depressions (F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA —Other (Explain in Remarks) _ 149B) di *Incators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric soil present? Y Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: 11245 218th St NE City/County: Scandia/Washingtc Sampling Date: 8/3/2018 Applicant/Owner: Brent Jensen State: MN Sampling Point SP2-2-upl Investigator(s): A. Krinke Section, Township, Range: Sec 18, T32, R20 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): linear Slope (%): 2-8 Lat.: Long.: Datum: Soil Map Unit Nami Campia silt loam NWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? circumstances" present? Yes (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Hydric soil present? N Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N If yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Climatic conditions typical (normal) based on gridded database method. HYDROLOGY US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Secondary Indicators (minimum of two Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) required) —Surface Water (Al) —Water -Stained Leaves (139) —Surface Soil Cracks (136) _ High Water Table (A2) _Aquatic Fauna (B13) —Drainage Patterns (B10) —Saturation (A3) _ Marl Deposits (B15) —Moss Trim Lines (1316) —Water Marks (131) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _Sediment Deposits (132) Oxidized Rhizospheres on _Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Drift Deposits (133) —Living Roots (C3) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery _Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ (C9) Deposits (B5) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled or Stressed Plants (D1) _Iron Inundation Visible on Aerial _Soils (C6) _Stunted _Geomorphic Position (D2) —Imagery (137) _Thin Muck Surface (C7) —Shallow Aquitard (D3) Sparsely Vegetated Concave —Other (Explain in Remarks) _ FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Surface (B8) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Indicators of Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology (includes capillary fringe) present? N Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Dry to 24 inches. US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region V tGt I A I WN - use scienTiTic names OT plants Sampling Point: SP2-2-u I 50/20 Thresholds Tree Stratum Plot Size ( 30 ) Absolute Dominant Indicator 20% 50% Cover Species Status Tree Stratum 16 40 1 Quercus rubra 70 Y FACU Sapling/Shrub Stratum 0 0 2 Ulmus americana 10 N FACW Herb Stratum 8 21 3 Woody Vine Stratum 0 0 4 5 Dominance Test Worksheet 6 Number of Dominant 7 Species that are OBL, 8 FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 9 Total Number of Dominant 10 Species Across all Strata: 4 (B) 80 = Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, Sapling/Shrub Plot Size ( 15 ) Absolute Dominant Indicator FACW, or FAC: 50.00% (A/B) Stratum % Cover Species Status Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 2 Total % Cover of: 3 OBL species 0 x 1= 0 4 FACW species 10 x2= 20 5 FAC species 30 x3= 90 6 FACU species 72 x4= 288 7 UPL species 10 x5= 50 8 Column totals 122 (A) 448 (B) 9 Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.67 10 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Herb Stratum Plot Size ( 5 ) Absolute Dominant Indicator _ Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetatior % Cover Species Status Dominance test is >50% 1 Rhamnus cathartica 20 Y FAC _ Prevalence index is <_3.0* 2 Carex pensylvanica 10 Y UPL _ Morphological adaptations* (provide 3 Rubus idaeus 10 Y FAC supporting data in Remarks or on a 4 Hackelia virginiana 2 N FACU _separate sheet) 5 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 6 7 —(explain) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 8 present, unless disturbed or problematic 9 10 Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 11 Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at 12 breast height (DBH), regardless of height. 13 14 Sapling/shrub- Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and 15 greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. 42 = Total Cover Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine Plot Size ( 30 ) Absolute Dominant Indicator Stratum % Cover Species Status Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 1 height. 2 3 4 Hydrophytic 5 vegetation 0 = Total Cover present? N Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region SOIL Samplina Point: SP2-2-UDI Profile Description: Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators. Depth Matrix Redox Features Inches Color moist % Color moist % Type* Loc*' Texture Remarks 0-11 10YR 3/1 100 loamy sand 11-17 10YR 3/2 90 10YR 4/1 5 D M sand 10YR 4/4 5 C M 17-24 10YR 4/3 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M sand *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced 'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: _ Histosol (Al) Polyvalue Below Surface _2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ (S8) (LRR R, MLRA —Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) —Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) —Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ (LRR R, MLRA 1498 —Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L _Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) —Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11_ (F1) (LRR K, L) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) —Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _Depleted Matrix (F3) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 1496) —Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145,149B) —Sandy Redox (S5) —Depleted Dark Surface (F7) —Red Parent Material (F21) _Stripped Matrix (S6) _Redox Depressions (F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA _Other (Explain in Remarks) _ 149113) `Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric soil present? N Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: 11245 218th St NE City/County: Scandia/Washingto Sampling Date: 8/3/2018 Applicant/Owner: Brent Jensen State: MN Sampling Point: SP2-2-wet Investigator(s): A. Krinke Section, Township, Range: Sec 18, T32, R20 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1 Lat.: Long.: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Water NWI Classification: PEM1A/PEM1C Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? circumstances" present? (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Yes Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Hydric soil present? Y Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y If yes, optional wetland site ID: Wetland 2 Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Climatic conditions typical (normal) based on gridded database method. HYDROLOGY US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Secondary Indicators (minimum of two Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) required) —Surface Water (Al) —Water -Stained Leaves (139) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) X High Water Table (A2) _Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) X Saturation (A3) —Marl Deposits (1315) —Moss Trim Lines (B16) —Water Marks (B1) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) —Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living —Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Roots (C3) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery —Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ (C9) Iron Deposits (135) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial (C6) _ X Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Imagery (137) —Soils _Thin Muck Surface (C7) —Shallow Aquitard (D3) Sparsely Vegetated Concave —Other (Explain in Remarks) X FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Surface (138) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Indicators of Water table present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 9 wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 6 hydrology (includes capillary fringe) present? Y Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region VEGETATION - Use sclentltic names of plants Sampling Point: SP2-2-wet 50/20 Thresholds Absolute Dominant Indicator 20% 50% Tree Stratum Plot Size ( 30 ) Cover Species Status Tree Stratum 0 0 1 Sapling/Shrub Stratum 0 0 2 Herb Stratum 8 20 3 Woody Vine Stratum 0 0 4 5 Dominance Test Worksheet 6 Number of Dominant 7 Species that are OBL, 8 FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 9 Total Number of Dominant 10 Species Across all Strata: 2 (B) 0 = Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, Sapling/Shrub Absolute Dominant Indicator FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) Stratum Plot Size ( 15 ) % Cover Species Status 1 Prevalence Index Worksheet 2 Total % Cover of: 3 OBL species 10 x 1 = 10 4 FACW species 30 x2= 60 5 FAC species 0 x3= 0 6 FACU species 0 x4= 0 7 UPL species 0 X5= 0 8 Column totals 40 (A) 70 (B) 9 Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.75 10 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Herb Stratum Plot Size ( 5 ) Absolute Dominant Indicator _ Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation Cover Species Status X Dominance test is >50% 1 Phalaris arundinacea 30 Y FACW X Prevalence index is <_3.0* 2 Typha x glauca 10 Y OBL Morphological adaptations* (provide 3 supporting data in Remarks or on a 4 sheet) 5 —separate Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 6 (explain) 7 _ "Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 8 present, unless disturbed or problematic 9 10 Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 11 12 Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. 13 14 Sapling/shrub- Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and 15 greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. 40 = Total Cover Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of Woody Vine Absolute Dominant Indicator size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Stratum Plot Size ( 30 ) % Cover Species P Status Woody vines -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 1 height. 2 3 4 Hydrophytic 5 vegetation 0 = Total Cover present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP2-2-wet Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc*' Texture Remarks 0-9 10YR 2/1 100 sandy loam 9-15 10YR 5/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M loamy sand `Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains "Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: _ Histosol (Al) Polyvalue Below Surface 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ (S8) (LRR R, MLRA 1498) —Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) —Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) —Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ (LRR R, MLRA 1498 _ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L _Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11; (LRR K, L) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) —Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 1498) —Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145,149B) —Sandy Redox (S5) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) —Red Parent Material (F21) —Stripped Matrix (S6) —Redox Depressions (F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA —Other (Explain in Remarks) _ 149B) *Incators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic di Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric soil present? Y Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: 11245 218th St NE City/County: Scandia/Washingto Sampling Date: 8/3/2018 Applicant/Owner: Brent Jensen State: MN Sampling Point: SP3-upl Investigator(s): A. Krinke Section, Township, Range: Sec 18, T32, R20 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): linear Slope (%): 2-8 Lat.: Long.: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Campia silt loam NWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? circumstances" present? Yes (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Hydric soil present? Y Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N If yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Climatic conditions typical (normal) based on gridded database method. HYDROLOGY US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Secondary Indicators (minimum of two Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) required) _ Surface Water (Al) —Water -Stained Leaves (139) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) _Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) —Saturation (A3) —Marl Deposits (1315) —Moss Trim Lines (B16) —Water Marks (B1) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) —Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living —Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Roots (C3) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery —Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ (C9) Iron Deposits (135) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial (C6) —Stunted Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Imagery (137) —Soils _Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ —Shallow Aquitard (D3) Sparsely Vegetated Concave —Other (Explain in Remarks) _ FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Surface (138) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Indicators of Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology (includes capillary fringe) present? N Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Dry to 24 inches. US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region VEGETATION - Use sclentltic names of plants Sampling Point: SP3-upl 50/20 Thresholds Tree Stratum Plot Size ( 30 ) Absolute Dominant Indicator 20% 50% Cover Species Status Tree Stratum 0 0 1 Sapling/Shrub Stratum 0 0 2 Herb Stratum 21 53 3 Woody Vine Stratum 0 0 4 5 Dominance Test Worksheet 6 Number of Dominant 7 Species that are OBL, 8 FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) 9 Total Number of Dominant 10 Species Across all Strata: 2 (B) 0 = Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, Sapling/Shrub Plot Size ( 15 ) Absolute Dominant Indicator FACW, or FAC: 0.00% (A/B) Stratum % Cover Species Status 1 Prevalence Index Worksheet 2 Total % Cover of: 3 OBL species 10 x 1 = 10 4 FACW species 0 x2= 0 5 FAC species 25 x3= 75 6 FACU species 70 x4= 280 7 UPL species 0 x5= 0 8 Column totals 105 (A) 365 (B) 9 Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.48 10 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Herb Stratum Plot Size ( 5 ) Absolute Dominant Indicator _ Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation % Cover Species Status Dominance test is >50% 1 So/idago canadensis 30 Y FACU _ Prevalence index is <_3.0* 2 Poa pratensis 30 Y FACU _ Morphological adaptations* (provide 3 Athyrium filix-femina 15 N FAC supporting data in Remarks or on a 4 Cirsium arvense 10 N FACU separate sheet) 5 Rubus idaeus 10 N FAC _ Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 6 Carex lasiocarpa 10 N OBL (explain) 7 _ "Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 8 present, unless disturbed or problematic 9 10 Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 11 12 Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. 13 14 Sapling/shrub- Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and 15 greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. 105 = Total Cover Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of Woody Vine Absolute Dominant Indicator size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Stratum Plot Size ( 30 ) % Cover Species P Status Woody vines -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 1 height. 2 3 4 Hydrophytic 5 vegetation 0 = Total Cover present? N Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP3-upl Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (Inches) Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type' Loc*' Texture Remarks 0-5 10YR 2/2 100 loam 5-18 10YR 5/1 90 10YR 6/1 5 D M loam 10YR 4/4 5 C M 18-24 10YR 5/1 80 10YR 4/4 20 C M loam `Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains "Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: _ Histosol (Al) Polyvalue Below Surface 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ (S8) (LRR R, MLRA 1498) —Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) —Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) —Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ (LRR R, MLRA 1498 _ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L _Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11; (LRR K, L) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) —Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 1498) —Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145,149B) —Sandy Redox (S5) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) —Red Parent Material (F21) —Stripped Matrix (S6) —Redox Depressions (F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA —Other (Explain in Remarks) _ 149B) di *Incators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric soil present? Y Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: 11245 218th St NE City/County: Scandia/Washingtc Sampling Date: 8/3/2018 Applicant/Owner: Brent Jensen State: MN Sampling Point SP3-wet Investigator(s): A. Krinke Section, Township, Range: Sec 18, T32, R20 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1 Lat.: Long.: Datum: Soil Map Unit Nami Cathro NWI Classification: PEM1C/PSS1C Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? circumstances" present? Yes (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Hydric soil present? Y Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y If yes, optional wetland site ID: Wetland 3 Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Climatic conditions typical (normal) based on gridded database method. HYDROLOGY US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Secondary Indicators (minimum of two Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) required) X Surface Water (Al) —Water -Stained Leaves (139) —Surface Soil Cracks (136) _ High Water Table (A2) _Aquatic Fauna (B13) —Drainage Patterns (B10) —Saturation (A3) _ Marl Deposits (B15) —Moss Trim Lines (1316) —Water Marks (131) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _Sediment Deposits (132) Oxidized Rhizospheres on _Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Drift Deposits (133) —Living Roots (C3) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery _Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ (C9) Deposits (B5) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled or Stressed Plants (D1) _Iron Inundation Visible on Aerial _Soils (C6) _Stunted X Geomorphic Position (D2) —Imagery (137) _Thin Muck Surface (C7) —Shallow Aquitard (D3) Sparsely Vegetated Concave —Other (Explain in Remarks) X FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Surface (B8) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes X No Depth (inches): see below Indicators of Water table present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 30 wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 30 hydrology (includes capillary fringe) present? Y Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Center of wetland inundated with at least 6 inches of water. US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region V tGt I A 11UN - use scienTITic names OT planTS Sampling Point: SP3-wet 50/20 Thresholds Tree Stratum Plot Size ( 30 ) Absolute Dominant Indicator 20% 50% Cover Species Status Tree Stratum 0 0 1 Sapling/Shrub Stratum 0 0 2 Herb Stratum 16 40 3 Woody Vine Stratum 0 0 4 5 Dominance Test Worksheet 6 Number of Dominant 7 Species that are OBL, 8 FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 9 Total Number of Dominant 10 Species Across all Strata: 3 (B) 0 = Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, Sapling/Shrub Plot Size ( 15 ) Absolute Dominant Indicator FACW, or FAC: 66.67% (A/B) Stratum % Cover Species Status 1 Prevalence Index Worksheet 2 Total % Cover of: 3 OBL species 45 x 1 = 45 4 FACW species 10 x2= 20 5 FAC species 10 x3= 30 6 FACU species 15 x4= 60 7 UPL species 0 x5= 0 8 Column totals 80 (A) 155 (B) 9 Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.94 10 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Herb Stratum Plot Size ( 5 ) Absolute Dominant Indicator Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetatior % Cover Species Status X Dominance test is >50% 1 Carex lasiocarpa 20 Y OBL X Prevalence index is <_3.0* 2 Solidago canadensis 15 Y FACU Morphological adaptations* (provide 3 Sagittaria latifolia 15 Y OBL supporting data in Remarks or on a 4 Solidago gigantea 10 N FACW sheet) 5 Athyrium filix-femina 10 N FAC _separate Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 6 Asclepias incarnata 10 N OBL 7 _(explain) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 8 present, unless disturbed or problematic 9 10 Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 11 Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at 12 breast height (DBH), regardless of height. 13 14 Sapling/shrub- Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and 15 greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. 80 = Total Cover Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine Plot Size ( 30 ) Absolute Dominant Indicator Stratum % Cover Species Status Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 1 height. 2 3 4 Hydrophytic 5 vegetation 0 = Total Cover present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region SOIL Samplina Point: SP3-wet Profile Description: Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators. Depth Matrix Redox Features Inches Color moist % Color moist % Type* Loc*' Texture Remarks 0-6 N 2.5/ 100 clay loam 6-18 10YR 5/1 90 10YR 4/6 10 C M clay loam 18-30 N 4/1 80 10YR 4/6 20 C M clay loam *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced 'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: _ Histosol (Al) Polyvalue Below Surface _2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ (S8) (LRR R, MLRA —Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) —Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) —Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ (LRR R, MLRA 1498 —Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11_ (F1) (LRR K, L) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) —Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _Depleted Matrix (F3) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 1496) —Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145,149B) —Sandy Redox (S5) —Depleted Dark Surface (F7) —Red Parent Material (F21) _Stripped Matrix (S6) _Redox Depressions (F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA _Other (Explain in Remarks) _ 149113) `Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric soil present? Y Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region 11245 218" Street NE Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX C Precipitation Data 8/26/2018 Precipitation Documentation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Minnesota State Climatology Office State Climatology Office - DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources University of Minnesota home I current conditions I journal I past data I summaries I agriculture I other sites I about us a Precipitation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Precipitation data for target wetland location: county: Washington township number: 32N township name: New Scandia range number: 20W nearest community: Scandia section number: 18 Aerial photograph or site visit date: Friday, August 3, 2018 Score using 1981-2010 normal period values are in inches A'R' following a monthly total indicates a provisional value derived from radar -based estimates. first prior month: July 2018 second prior month: June 2018 third prior month: May 2018 estimated precipitation total for this location: 6.11 R 4.52R 2.34 there is a 30% chance this location will have less than: 2.82 3.41 2.75 there is a 30% chance this location will have more than: 4.99 5.65 4.25 type of month: dry normal wet wet normal dry monthly score 3* 3= 9 2* 2= 4 1* 1= 1 multi -month score: 6 to 9 (dry) 10 to 14 (normal) 15 to 18 (wet) 14 (Normal) Other Resources: ■ retrieve daily precipitation data ■ view radar -based precipitation estimates ■ view weekly precipitation maps ■ Evaluating Antecedent Precipitation Conditions (BWSR) http://climateapps.dn r. state.mn.us/gridded_data/precip/wetland/worksheet.asp?passXutm83=508895&passYutm83=5011917&passcounty=Washingto... 1 /1 11245218 Ih St. NE, Scandia, MN: Precipitation Summary Source: Minnesota Climatology Working Group Monthly Totals: 2018 Target: T32 R20 S18 (latitude mon year cc tttN rrW ss nnnn Tan 2018 13 33N 20w 23 SWCD Feb 2018 13 33N 21w 13 BYRG Mar 2018 13 33N 21W 13 BYRG Apr 2018 82 32N 21w 2 SWC May 2018 82 32N 21w 2 SWC Sun 2018 13 33N 21W 13 BYRG Jul 2018 13 33N 21W 13 BYRG Aug 2018 62 30N 22w 24 SWCD 45.26070 longitude: 92.88663) 00000000 pre (inches) .90 1.81 1.20 1.92 2.26 3.87 7.43 4.26 May/lune/7uly/Aug Daily Records May 1, 2018 .01 May 2, 2018 .04 May 3, 2018 0 May 4, 2018 0 May 5, 2018 0 May 6, 2018 0 May 7, 2018 0 May 8, 2018 0 May 9, 2018 .08 May 10, 2018 .15 May 11, 2018 .02 May 12, 2018 0 May 13, 2018 0 May 14, 2018 0 May 15, 2018 .12 May 16, 2018 0 May 17, 2018 0 May 18, 2018 0 May 19, 2018 0 May 20, 2018 0 May 21, 2018 0 May 22, 2018 0 May 23, 2018 0 May 24, 2018 0 May 25, 2018 .17 May 26, 2018 .17 May 27, 2018 0 May 28, 2018 0 May 29, 2018 .38 May 30, 2018 .96 May 31, 2018 .16 Jun 1, 2018 0 Jun 2, 2018 0 Jun 3, 2018 .53 Jun 4, 2018 0 Jun 5, 2018 0 Jun 6, 2018 .42 Jun 7, 2018 0 Jun 8, 2018 0 Jun 9, 2018 0 Jun 10, 2018 0 Jun 11, 2018 0 Jun 12, 2018 .10 Jun 13, 2018 0 Jun 14, 2018 0 Jun 15, 2018 0 Jun 16, 2018 0 Jun 17, 2018 .62 Jun 18, 2018 1.23 Jun 19, 2018 0 Jun 20, 2018 .20 Jun 21, 2018 0 Jun 22, 2018 0 Jun 23, 2018 0 Jun 24, 2018 0 Jun 25, 2018 0 Jun 26, 2018 .54 Jun 27, 2018 .23 Jun 28, 2018 0 Jun 29, 2018 0 Jun 30, 2018 0 Jul 1, 2018 0 Jul 2, 2018 1.50 Jul 3, 2018 0 Jul 4, 2018 0 Jul 5, 2018 1.25 Jul 6, 2018 0 Jul 7, 2018 0 Jul 8, 2018 0 Jul 9, 2018 0 Jul 10, 2018 0 Jul 11, 2018 0 Jul 12, 2018 0 Jul 13, 2018 3.70 Jul 14, 2018 .14 Jul 15, 2018 0 Jul 16, 2018 0 Jul 17, 2018 0 Jul 18, 2018 0 Jul 19, 2018 0 Jul 20, 2018 .38 Jul 21, 2018 .06 Jul 22, 2018 0 Jul 23, 2018 0 Jul 24, 2018 0 Jul 25, 2018 0 Jul 26, 2018 .21 Jul 27, 2018 .15 Jul 28, 2018 0 Jul 29, 2018 .04 Jul 30, 2018 0 Jul 31, 2018 0 Aug 1, 2018 0 Aug 2, 2018 .82 Aug 3, 2018 0 1981-2010 Summary Statistics Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec WARM ANN WA 30% 0.50 0.44 1.17 1.84 2.75 3.41 2.82 3.17 2.47 1.39 0.94 0.70 17.01 28.81 29.43 70% 1.05 1.04 1.93 3.20 4.25 5.65 4.99 5.19 4.31 3.89 2.04 1.44 22.31 34.22 35.99 mean 0.89 0.84 1.67 2.75 3.67 4.63 4.12 4.14 3.55 2.75 1.78 1.13 20.10 31.92 31.76 11 10 m t 9 v C C g O c� 'Q 7 .v Q 6 5 t c 4 O E c 3 c� >, 2 1 0 3/30/1 8�EFIE, 11R: EIM-71 RMTAE,VAR: WPQGIIAIE:�MyfiKifiR: MOVII31R�WflfiFC71R: W0��yliRM 0 monthly precip — daily precip 30d rolling total Comments submitted by John Lindell 02/20/2019 As noted above I want to be notified of the site visit. I have expressed my concerns to you and the Council regarding the proposed driveway just a few yards from German Lake to access the building site with a driveway across a stream that flows into German Lake. Washington County, with voter approval,adopted its Land and Water Legacy Program in 2006 to improve and protect waters. An approval of the German Lake plan would require multiple variances in direct contravention of the special funding and voter support to protect County waters. The Council should make its land use and variance decisions that supports the County and State to protect drinking and other water uses. I hope they will. regards, John Lindell