Loading...
9.a ArgoNavisWCA_MN_joint_appl_form_FINAL Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 1 of 12 Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota This joint application form is the accepted means for initiating review of proposals that may affect a water resource (wetland, tributary, lake, etc.) in the State of Minnesota under state and federal regulatory programs. Applicants for Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Public Waters permits MUST use the MPARS online permitting system for submitting applications to the DNR. Applicants can use the information entered into MPARS to substitute for completing parts of this joint application form (see the paragraph on MPARS at the end of the joint application form instructions for additional information). This form is only applicable to the water resource aspects of proposed projects under state and federal regulatory programs; other local applications and approvals may be required. Depending on the nature of the project and the location and type of water resources impacted, multiple authorizations may be required as different regulatory programs have different types of jurisdiction over different types of resources. Regulatory Review Structure Federal The St. Paul District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is the federal agency that regulates discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States (wetlands, tributaries, lakes, etc.) under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and regulates work in navigable waters under Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. Applications are assigned to Corps project managers who are responsible for implementing the Corps regulatory program within a particular geographic area. State There are three state regulatory programs that regulate activities affecting water resources. The Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) regulates most activities affecting wetlands. It is administered by local government units (LGUs) which can be counties, townships, cities, watershed districts, watershed management organizations or state agencies (on state-owned land). The Minnesota DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources issues permits for work in specially-designated public waters via the Public Waters Work Permit Program (DNR Public Waters Permits). The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act certifies that discharges of dredged or fill material authorized by a federal permit or license comply with state water quality standards. One or more of these regulatory programs may be applicable to any one project. Required Information Prior to submitting an application, applicants are strongly encouraged to seek input from the Corps Project Manager and LGU staff to identify regulatory issues and required application materials for their proposed project. Project proponents can request a pre- application consultation with the Corps and LGU to discuss their proposed project by providing the information required in Sections 1 through 5 of this joint application form to facilitate a meaningful discussion about their project. Many LGUs provide a venue (such as regularly scheduled technical evaluation panel meetings) for potential applicants to discuss their projects with multiple agencies prior to submitting an application. Contact information is provided below. The following bullets outline the information generally required for several common types of determinations/authorizations. • For delineation approvals and/or jurisdictional determinations, submit Parts 1, 2 and 5, and Attachment A. • For activities involving CWA/WCA exemptions, WCA no-loss determinations, and activities not requiring mitigation, submit Parts 1 through 5, and Attachment B. • For activities requiring compensatory mitigation/replacement plan, submit Parts 1 thru 5, and Attachments C and D. • For local road authority activities that qualify for the state’s local road wetland replacement program, submit Parts 1 through 5, and Attachments C, D (if applicable), and E to both the Corps and the LGU. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 2 of 12 Submission Instructions Send the completed joint application form and all required attachments to: U.S Army Corps of Engineers. Applications may be sent directly to the appropriate Corps Office. For a current listing of areas of responsibilities and contact information, visit the St. Paul District’s website at: http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory.aspx and select “Minnesota” from the contact Information box. Alternatively, applications may be sent directly to the St. Paul District Headquarters and the Corps will forward them to the appropriate field office. Section 401 Water Quality Certification: Applicants do not need to submit the joint application form to the MPCA unless specifically requested. The MPCA will request a copy of the completed joint application form directly from an applicant when they determine an individual 401 water quality certification is required for a proposed project. Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit: Send to the appropriate Local Government Unit. If necessary, contact your county Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) office or visit the Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) web site (www.bwsr.state.mn.us) to determine the appropriate LGU. DNR Public Waters Permitting: In 2014 the DNR will begin using the Minnesota DNR Permitting and Reporting System (MPARS) for submission of Public Waters permit applications (https://webapps11.dnr.state.mn.us/mpars/public/authentication/login). Applicants for Public Waters permits MUST use the MPARS online permitting system for submitting applications to the DNR. To avoid duplication and to streamline the application process among the various resource agencies, applicants can use the information entered into MPARS to substitute for completing parts of this joint application form. The MPARS print/save function will provide the applicant with a copy of the Public Waters permit application which, at a minimum, will satisfy Parts one and two of this joint application. For certain types of activities, the MPARS application may also provide all of the necessary information required under Parts three and four of the joint application. However, it is the responsibility of the Applicant to make sure that the joint application contains all of the required information, including identification of all aquatic resources impacted by the project (see Part four of the joint application). After confirming that the MPARS application contains all of the required information in Parts one and two the Applicant may attach a copy to the joint application and fill in any missing information in the remainder of the joint application. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 3 of 12 Project Name and/or Number: PART ONE: Applicant Information If applicant is an entity (company, government entity, partnership, etc.), an authorized contact person must be identified. If the applicant is using an agent (consultant, lawyer, or other third party) and has authorized them to act on their behalf, the agent’s contact information must also be provided. Applicant/Landowner Name: BHE Renewables Mailing Address: 17200 N. Perimeter Dr; Suite 202; Scottsdale, AZ 85255 Phone: 805-458-7924 E-mail Address: wlgreene@bherenewables.com Authorized Contact (do not complete if same as above): Wendy Greene Mailing Address: 10400 Helios Way; Santa Margarita, CA 93453 Phone: 602-271-5638 E-mail Address: same Agent Name: John Hanson Mailing Address: 4300 MarketPointe Drive, Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55435 Phone: 952-832-2622 E-mail Address: jhanson@barr.com PART TWO: Site Location Information County: Washington City/Township: Scandia Parcel ID and/or Address: 1903219210002 Legal Description (Section, Township, Range): Section 19, T32N, R 19W Lat/Long (decimal degrees): 45.253322/-97.768158 Attach a map showing the location of the site in relation to local streets, roads, highways. Approximate size of site (acres) or if a linear project, length (feet): 21.5 acres If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you must provide the names and addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to your application or by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at: http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Portals/57/docs/regulatory/RegulatoryDocs/engform_4345_2012oct.pdf PART THREE: General Project/Site Information If this application is related to a delineation approval, exemption determination, jurisdictional determination, or other correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number. The Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) reviewed the conditions of the impacted wetland,. Eroded slope/ravine, and extent of the storm water management on July 30, 2019. A TEP Findings Report was submitted on August 27, 2019 (Appendix A). Describe the project that is being proposed, the project purpose and need, and schedule for implementation and completion. The project description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements that effect aquatic resources (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings showing the location, character, and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts. The proposed project is located on the Argo Navis Community Solar Garden (Facility) in Scandia, Minnesota (Figure 1). Stormwater from the facility discharged from the site and impacted an adjacent slope and 0.1492 acres of wetland. The purpose of the proposed project is to mitigate the wetland impacts associated with the stormwater Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 4 of 12 discharge. Due to access restrictions and slope stabilization concerns, the TEP determined the wetland impacts should be mitigated off-site per WCA and the Carnelian-Marine-St. Croix Watershed District (CMSCWD)’s replacement requirements. The TEP recommends 2:1 mitigation through a WCA bank and 4:1 through the CMSCWD’s restoration fund, to achieve a ratio of 6:1 (Appendix A). No work is proposed to be conducted within the previously impacted wetland. BHE Renewables has a purchase agreement for 0.2984 mitigation credits with Steve Cerven, Wetland Bank Account 1499 (Appendix B). The transaction form to withdraw credits from the Minnesota Wetland Bank program is provided in Appendix C. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 6 of 12 Project Name and/or Number: Attachment A Request for Delineation Review, Wetland Type Determination, or Jurisdictional Determination By submission of the enclosed wetland delineation report, I am requesting that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District (Corps) and/or the Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit (LGU) provide me with the following (check all that apply): Wetland Type Confirmation Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with a delineation is a written notification from the Corps and a decision from the LGU concurring, not concurring, or commenting on the boundaries of the aquatic resources delineated on the property. Delineation concurrences are generally valid for five years unless site conditions change. Under this request alone, the Corps will not address the jurisdictional status of the aquatic resources on the property, only the boundaries of the resources within the review area (including wetlands, tributaries, lakes, etc.). Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination. A preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) is a non-binding written indication from the Corps that waters, including wetlands, identified on a parcel may be waters of the United States. For purposes of computation of impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements, a permit decision made on the basis of a PJD will treat all waters and wetlands in the review area as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. PJDs are advisory in nature and may not be appealed. Approved Jurisdictional Determination. An approved jurisdictional determination (AJD) is an official Corps determination that jurisdictional waters of the United States are either present or absent on the property. AJDs can generally be relied upon by the affected party for five years. An AJD may be appealed through the Corps administrative appeal process. In order for the Corps and LGU to process your request, the wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual, and the Guidelines for Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota (2013). http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/DelineationJDGuidance.aspx Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 7 of 12 Project Name and/or Number: Attachment B Supporting Information for Applications Involving Exemptions, No Loss Determinations, and Activities Not Requiring Mitigation Complete this part if you maintain that the identified aquatic resource impacts in Part Four do not require wetland replacement/compensatory mitigation OR if you are seeking verification that the proposed water resource impacts are either exempt from replacement or are not under CWA/WCA jurisdiction. Identify the specific exemption or no-loss provision for which you believe your project or site qualifies: Provide a detailed explanation of how your project or site qualifies for the above. Be specific and provide and refer to attachments and exhibits that support your contention. Applicants should refer to rules (e.g. WCA rules), guidance documents (e.g. BWSR guidance, Corps guidance letters/public notices), and permit conditions (e.g. Corps General Permit conditions) to determine the necessary information to support the application. Applicants are strongly encouraged to contact the WCA LGU and Corps Project Manager prior to submitting an application if they are unsure of what type of information to provide: Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 8 of 12 Project Name and/or Number: Attachment C Avoidance and Minimization Project Purpose, Need, and Requirements. Clearly state the purpose of your project and need for your project. Also include a description of any specific requirements of the project as they relate to project location, project footprint, water management, and any other applicable requirements. Attach an overhead plan sheet showing all relevant features of the project (buildings, roads, etc.), aquatic resource features (impact areas noted) and construction details (grading plans, storm water management plans, etc.), referencing these as necessary: Please refer to Part Three for a description of the projects purpose and need. The project requirements include the mitigation of the 0.1492 acres of wetland impacts that occurred as a result of the stormwater discharge. The TEP Findings Report is attached in Appendix A. The TEP requested that the mitigation be completed off-site at 2:1 for the impacts to the wetland under the WCA using a wetland bank. This is a ratio reduced from potentially higher requirements for a violation for the following reasons. First, the wetland is still viable and is recovering. Second, BHE Reneables completed construction upslope to prevent future impacts to the wetland. Third, BHE Renewables will also complete mitigation at a 4:1 ratio (in addition to WCA banking) by contributing to the CMSCWD restoration fund, receipt attached for documentation (Appendix D). Avoidance. Both the CWA and the WCA require that impacts to aquatic resources be avoided if practicable alternatives exist. Clearly describe all on-site measures considered to avoid impacts to aquatic resources and discuss at least two project alternatives that avoid all impacts to aquatic resources on the site. These alternatives may include alternative site plans, alternate sites, and/or not doing the project. Alternatives should be feasible and prudent (see MN Rules 8420.0520 Subp. 2 C). Applicants are encouraged to attach drawings and plans to support their analysis: Due to the unintentional nature of the wetland impacts, avoidance was not possible. Two alternatives were assessed to mitigate the unintentional wetland impacts; information related to the alternatives was provided previously to the TEP. After consultation with the TEP, the selected alternative consisted of leaving the sediment in place. This alternative would result in a small area of wetland partially-filled, though it would not lead to a conversion to non-wetland. This fill would likely cause some wetland degradation, but would probably diminish. To account for degradation to the wetland, BHE renewables proposed two-stage mitigation: First BHE renewables would improve the wetland with some plantings; second, they would pay for compensatory off- site mitigation through a wetland bank at a 2:1 ratio. This would be half of the ratio required for violations under WCA. Minimization. Both the CWA and the WCA require that all unavoidable impacts to aquatic resources be minimized to the greatest extent practicable. Discuss all features of the proposed project that have been modified to minimize the impacts to water resources (see MN Rules 8420.0520 Subp. 4): Further wetland impacts were avoided through the construction of upslope stormwater basins and various slope stabilization measures approved by the TEP. Off-Site Alternatives. An off-site alternatives analysis is not required for all permit applications. If you know that your proposal will require an individual permit (standard permit or letter of permission) from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you may be required to provide an off-site alternatives analysis. The alternatives analysis is not required for a complete application but must be provided during the review process in order for the Corps to complete the evaluation of your application and reach a final decision. Applicants with questions about when an off-site alternatives analysis is required should contact their Corps Project Manager. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 9 of 12 Project Name and/or Number: Attachment D Replacement/Compensatory Mitigation Complete this part if your application involves wetland replacement/compensatory mitigation not associated with the local road wetland replacement program. Applicants should consult Corps mitigation guidelines and WCA rules for requirements. Replacement/Compensatory Mitigation via Wetland Banking. Complete this section if you are proposing to use credits from an existing wetland bank (with an account number in the State wetland banking system) for all or part of your replacement/compensatory mitigation requirements. Wetland Bank Account # County Major Watershed # Bank Service Area # Credit Type (if applicable) Number of Credits 1499 Anoka 37 6 U- Upland buffer 0.2984 Applicants should attach documentation indicating that they have contacted the wetland bank account owner and reached at least a tentative agreement to utilize the identified credits for the project. This documentation could be a signed purchase agreement, signed application for withdrawal of credits or some other correspondence indicating an agreement between the applicant and the bank owner. However, applicants are advised not to enter into a binding agreement to purchase credits until the mitigation plan is approved by the Corps and LGU. Project-Specific Replacement/Permittee Responsible Mitigation. Complete this section if you are proposing to pursue actions (restoration, creation, preservation, etc.) to generate wetland replacement/compensatory mitigation credits for this proposed project. WCA Action Eligible for Credit1 Corps Mitigation Compensation Technique2 Acres Credit % Requested Credits Anticipated3 County Major Watershed # Bank Service Area # 1Refer to the name and subpart number in MN Rule 8420.0526. 2Refer to the technique listed in St. Paul District Policy for Wetland Compensatory Mitigation in Minnesota. 3If WCA and Corps crediting differs, then enter both numbers and distinguish which is Corps and which is WCA. Explain how each proposed action or technique will be completed (e.g. wetland hydrology will be restored by breaking the tile……) and how the proposal meets the crediting criteria associated with it. Applicants should refer to the Corps mitigation policy language, WCA rule language, and all associated Corps and WCA guidance related to the action or technique: Attach a site location map, soils map, recent aerial photograph, and any other maps to show the location and other relevant features of each wetland replacement/mitigation site. Discuss in detail existing vegetation, existing landscape features, land use (on and surrounding the site), existing soils, drainage systems (if present), and water sources and movement. Include a topographic map showing key features related to hydrology and water flow (inlets, outlets, ditches, pumps, etc.): Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 10 of 12 Project Name and/or Number: Attach a map of the existing aquatic resources, associated delineation report, and any documentation of regulatory review or approval. Discuss as necessary: For actions involving construction activities, attach construction plans and specifications with all relevant details. Discuss and provide documentation of a hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of the site to define existing conditions, predict project outcomes, identify specific project performance standards and avoid adverse offsite impacts. Plans and specifications should be prepared by a licensed engineer following standard engineering practices. Discuss anticipated construction sequence and timing: For projects involving vegetation restoration, provide a vegetation establishment plan that includes information on site preparation, seed mixes and plant materials, seeding/planting plan (attach seeding/planting zone map), planting/seeding methods, vegetation maintenance, and an anticipated schedule of activities: For projects involving construction or vegetation restoration, identify and discuss goals and specific outcomes that can be determined for credit allocation. Provide a proposed credit allocation table tied to outcomes: Provide a five-year monitoring plan to address project outcomes and credit allocation: Discuss and provide evidence of ownership or rights to conduct wetland replacement/mitigation on each site: Quantify all proposed wetland credits and compare to wetland impacts to identify a proposed wetland replacement ratio. Discuss how this replacement ratio is consistent with Corps and WCA requirements: By signature below, the applicant attests to the following (only required if application involves project-specific/permittee responsible replacement): • All proposed replacement wetlands were not: • Previously restored or created under a prior approved replacement plan or permit • Drained or filled under an exemption during the previous 10 years • Restored with financial assistance from public conservation programs • Restored using private funds, other than landowner funds, unless the funds are paid back with interest to the individual or organization that funded the restoration and the individual or organization notifies the local government unit in writing that the restored wetland may be considered for replacement. • The wetland will be replaced before or concurrent with the actual draining or filling of a wetland. • An irrevocable bank letter of credit, performance bond, or other acceptable security will be provided to guarantee successful completion of the wetland replacement. • Within 30 days of either receiving approval of this application or beginning work on the project, I will record the Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants on the deed for the property on which the replacement wetland(s) will be located and submit proof of such recording to the LGU and the Corps. Applicant or Representative: Title: Signature: Date: Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 11 of 12 Project Name and/or Number: Attachment E Local Road Replacement Program Qualification Complete this part if you are a local road authority (county highway department, city transportation department, etc.) seeking verification that your project (or a portion of your project) qualifies for the MN Local Government Road Wetland Replacement Program (LGRWRP). If portions of your project are not eligible for the LGRWRP, then Attachment D should be completed and attached to your application. Discuss how your project is a repair, rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement of a currently serviceable road to meet state/federal design or safety standards/requirements. Applicants should identify the specific road deficiencies and how the project will rectify them. Attach supporting documents and information as applicable: Provide a map, plan, and/or aerial photograph accurately depicting wetland boundaries within the project area. Attach associated delineation/determination report or otherwise explain the method(s) used to identify and delineate wetlands. Also attach and discuss any type of review or approval of wetland boundaries or other aspects of the project by a member or members of the local Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) or Corps of Engineers: In the table below, identify only the wetland impacts from Part 4 that the road authority has determined should qualify for the LGRWRP. Wetland Impact ID (as noted on overhead view) Type of Impact (fill, excavate, drain) Size of Impact (square feet or acres to 0.01) Existing Plant Community Type(s) in Impact Area1 County, Major Watershed #, and Bank Service Area # of Impact2 1Use Wetland Plants and Plant Community Types of Minnesota and Wisconsin 3rd Ed. as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp. 2. 2Refer to Major Watershed and Bank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp. 7. Discuss the feasibility of providing onsite compensatory mitigation/replacement for important site-specific wetland functions: Please note that under the MN Wetland Conservation Act, projects with less than 10,000 square feet of wetland impact are allowed to commence prior to submission of this notification so long as the notification is submitted within 30 days of the impact. The Clean Water Act has no such provision and requires that permits be obtained prior to any regulated discharges into water of the United States. To avoid potential unauthorized activities, road authorities must, at a minimum, provide a complete application to the Corps and receive a permit prior to commencing work. By signature below, the road authority attests that they have followed the process in MN Rules 8420.0544 and have determined that the wetland impacts identified in Part 4 are eligible for the MN Local Government Road Wetland Replacement Program. Road Authority Representative: Title: Signature: Date: Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 12 of 12 Technical Evaluation Panel Concurrence: Project Name and/or Number: TEP member: Representing: Concur with road authority’s determination of qualification for the local road wetland replacement program? Yes No Signature: _________________________________________ Date: TEP member: Representing: Concur with road authority’s determination of qualification for the local road wetland replacement program? Yes No Signature: _________________________________________ Date: TEP member: Representing: Concur with road authority’s determination of qualification for the local road wetland replacement program? Yes No Signature: _________________________________________ Date: TEP member: Representing: Concur with road authority’s determination of qualification for the local road wetland replacement program? Yes No Signature: _________________________________________ Date: Upon approval and signature by the TEP, application must be sent to: Wetland Bank Administration Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources 520 Lafayette Road North Saint Paul, MN 55155 Figures #*Approximate Wetland Location Quality T r N 209th St N Pi l a r R d N 195th St NPryor Ave NQuadrantAve NQuintAve N215th St N Saint Croix Tr N209thSt N 205th St N 205thSt N Parkview Ave N205thStreetCt NPeabody Tr N197th St NParkview La NPenrose Ave N220th St N Oakhill R d N Scandia Tr N 199th St NPomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave N¨©52 95 97 WETLAND IMPACT LOCATIONArgo Navis Sediment DischargeBHE Renewables FIGURE 1 Barr Footer:0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet !;N Appendix A TEP Findings Reports Minnesota Wetland ConsetVation Act Technical Evaluation Panel Findings Report Date(s) of Site Visit/Meeting: County: Project Name: Location of Project: {attach map if possible) TEP ATTENDEES: LGU: Merritt Clapp Smith (email) SWCD: Jay Riggs BWSR: Ben Meyer DNR: 8-15-19 Washington Argo Navis Sediment Discharge OTHER ATTENDEES: Mike lsensee (CMSCWD) Kurt Leuthold (Barr) PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE OF MEETING: LGU: City of Scandia LGU Contact: Merritt Clapp Smith Phone#: 651.433.2274 Email Address: merritt.clapp- smith@tkda.com OTHER ATTENDEES: Members of the TEP visited the Argo Navis Solar Site on July 30. 2019 to see the status of the stormwater management improvements and discuss the "Plan for Sediment Removal from Wetland and Up-slope Erosion Control" (7 /19) submitted by Barr Engineering. Follow-up converstions occurred with BWSR in early August. The results of the follow- up TEP conversations are descrived herein. TYPE OF MEETING: Checkollapplicable D Office ~ On-Site D Phone Conference ~ E-Mail D Other: __ TEP FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1: After reviewing the conditions of the impacted wetland, eroded slope/ravine, and extent of the stormwater management on July 30, 2019, the TEP proposesan alternative approach to address the wetland impact. As noted in the original TEP Findings (9/18) and summarized in Argo's "Plan for Sediment Removal from Wetland and Up-slope Erosion Control" (7 /19), the TEP recommended: (3) The TEP . agrees the sediment should be removed from the WCA wetland and that the side slopes should be seeded with a shade tolerant wetland seed mix. (4) The TEP agrees the denuded slope will need to be stabilized. In the short term, the use of a temporary slope drain to convey the water from the pond overflow to near the culvert under the railroad grade is recommended. With heavy snows and lack of response from the railroad in late 2018 and early 2019, Argo was not able to remove the spoils in the wetland. Over the winter they did implement some short term mitigation through strategic cuttings and log placement. More importantly, the stormwater storage at the top of the slope was increased dramatically and a plan was developed to store and treat up to (and over) the 100-yr storm. Subsequently Argo has continued to upgrade, construct, and stabilize a large system of ponds to treat, store, and infiltrate water from the site and adjacent properties. The emergency overflow has been moved to an existing ravine 1 TEP Findings should be a meaningful concise summary detailing the project conditions, technical data, and what rules apply. The TEP recommendation should be clear,based on rule and best professional judgement. Rev. 12/17/2013 Appendix B Purchase Agreement Appendix C Transaction Form to Withdraw Credits BWSR form updated 5/31/2017 Page 1 of 2 1. Credit User This space for BWSR use only. Name: Wendy Greene Organization: BHE Renewables Address: 1850 N. Central Ave, STE 1025 Email: Phoenix, AZ 85004 wlgreene@bherenewables.com Phone: 805-458-7924 LGU File #: 17-013 Consultant: Barr Engineering Co. 2. Wetland Impact Information To be completed for the project impacting wetlands and with which this withdrawal is intended to replace. Project Name: Argo Navis Community Solar Garden Impact Size (acres): 0.1492 Impact County: Washington Impact Wetland type: 7 (PFOB) Impact Major Watershed/BSA: __37 /_6__ Replacement Ratio: 2:1 Sec/Twp/Range: 19 / 32N / 19W *Projects with multiple locations should use the most central location in relation to the project as a whole. Are Federally authorized credits required for this impact? Yes No Corps Regulatory File Number: MVP- N/A Comments: See TEP Findings Report from 8-15-2019 meeting 3. Credits to be Withdrawn To be completed by the seller of the credits (account holder) Account Information Account: 1499 (Cerven) County: Anoka Bank Service Area: 6 Credit Subgroup Wetland Type/Plant Community Type Federally Approved? Cost per Credit Credit Amounts B U – Upland buffer N $32,670 0.2984 Per Credit Withdrawal Fee by BSA Enter the Withdrawal Fee for the BSA of the account: Total Credits: 0.2984 BSA 1 $520 BSA 6 $1,083 (Withdrawal Fee x total credits) BSA 2 $371 BSA 7 $1,992 $1,083 Withdrawal Fee: $323.17 BSA 3 $725 BSA 8 $2,577 Easement Stewardship Fee: (Easement Stewardship fee x total credits) BSA 4 $1,412 BSA 9 $2,628 $302 Stewardship Fee: $90.12 BSA 5 $685 BSA 10 $3,099 Total Fees: $413.28 Please make checks payable to the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources. BWSR does not accept cash. BWSR fee policy: http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/wetlandbanking/fee_and_sales_data/Wetland_Banking_Fee_Policy_Effective_June1_2017.pdf If the layout of this form looks incorrect, click on View, Edit Document, then save it to your computer. Transaction Form to Withdraw Credits Minnesota Wetland Bank Program BWSR form updated 5/31/2017 Page 2 of 2 dtix@barr.com 4. Regulatory Authorization By signing below, the identified agency and authorized representative hereby certifies that they have: a) verified that the subject wetland credits are deposited in the account of the owner/seller, b) approved a wetland replacement plan or similar agreement under their jurisdiction, and c) approve the proposed use of the wetland bank credit described above. WCA LGU/Agency: LGU Representative: Email Address: Signature Date For NRCS, DNR, etc. as applicable Agency Name and Location: Representative: Email Address: Signature Date 5. Credit User Signature By signing below the proposed credit user attests that he/she owns or has purchased the credits identified in this form and has received approval from the regulatory authority(ies). Signature Date 6. Account Holder Signature By signing below I, the seller and holder of the aforementioned account in the State of Minnesota Wetland Mitigation Bank, certify that: 1) The credits described in this transaction form have been sold to the credit user or will be used for my own project; 2) I have received payment in full from the buyer (if applicable); 3) The credits described in this transaction form have not been sold or used in any way to mitigate wetland losses other than for the project and location identified in the wetland impact information block on the previous page; 4) The credits described in this application should be withdrawn from my account; and 5) I will not have a negative balance of credits after the subject credits are debited from my account. Name/Representative: Email Address: Signature Date Send complete forms and fee payments to: Wetland Bank Administration Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources 520 Lafayette Road North Saint Paul, MN 55155 Confirmation email will be emailed to the user, seller, and regulatory representative when the transaction is complete. If anyone else should be notified please indicated their emails below: Disclaimer: All transactions in the Wetland Bank system are public information Disclaimer: All transactions in the Wetland Bank system are public information Project Name: Argo Navis Sediment Discharge Appendix D CMSCWD Restoration Fund Receipt Wade Johnson, President ● Kristin Tuenge, Treasurer ● Paul Richert, Secretary Eric Lindberg, Manager ● Andy Weaver, Manager Carnelian-Marine-St. Croix Watershed District Scandia Plaza II • 21150 Ozark Avenue • P.O. Box 188 • Scandia, MN 55073 • Tel 651.433.2150 December 4, 2019 Wendy Greene Environmental Compliance Officer BHE Renewables 1850 North Central Suite 1025 Phoenix AZ 85004-93560 RE: Carnelian Marine St. Croix Watershed District Wetland Restoration Fund Payment Dear Wendy, This letter confirms receipt of $29,836 for the 4:1 wetland replacement payment to the Carnelian Marine St. Croix Watershed District Wetland Restoration Fund. Regards, Mike Isensee Administrator Enclosure CC: Carl Almer, Emmons and Olivier Resources Carnelian-Marine-St.Croix Watershed District PO Box 188 Scandia, MN 55073 US (651)433-2150 mike.isensee@cmscwd.org Receipt Received From Argo Nevis c/o BHE Renewables LLC 1850 North Central Suite 1025 Phoenix, AZ 85004-93560 Date:12/04/2019 Payment Method:Check Reference No:100497 Invoice Number Invoice Date Due Date Original Amount Balance Payment 2006-25 11/19/2019 12/19/2019 29836.00 29836.00 29836.00 Memo:Amount Credited:$0.00 Total:$29,836.00 Signature:--------------------------