Loading...
6. KSD_SSTS DESIGN_12050 196th St, Scandia_10-22-20_Ver 1.310/22/2020  SSTS Design  12050 196th Street North Scandia, MN 55073 PID # 29.032.20.14.0009 Version 1.3 Kloeppner Services & Designs, LLC  MPCA LICENSE # 4043  763.843.4114  CONNECT@KSD‐MN.COM  Prepared by KSD @ 2020 www.ksd‐mn.com Page | 1  SSTS Design Summary Report 10/22/20 On October 7th, 2020, a site evaluation was conducted at 12050 196th Streets North, Scandia, MN 55073 in  Washington County to identify a location for a replacement Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS).   The PID number is 29.032.20.14.0009.  The replacement SSTS is a Type III Mound dispersal bed with a new  Sewage Tank and a Pump Tank.   Prior to submitting for permit from the local unit government or county, please review and sign all pages  which require a signature.    Wastewater Sources & Peak Flow Rate  The expected waste strength is Residential Wastewater with a Peak flow of 300 Gallons Per Day (GPD) for a  2‐bedroom house.  The Actual Daily Flow should be less than 70% of the Peak Flow (210 GPD).   Sewage Tanks  The required Sewage Tanks for a two (2) bedroom home is 1,500‐gallons in two tanks or two  compartments.  The designed Sewage Tank is 1,500‐gallons in a single tank with 500‐gallons and 1,000‐ gallons compartments.  An additional Pump Tank will be used for a pump to pressurize the Mound  distribution network.  The Pump Tank will also provide 600‐gallons of Reserve Storage for flows in excess of  150‐gallons/24‐hours above the High‐Level Water Alarm.  The existing septic tank and drainfield must be abandoned.  Type III Mound  The dispersal area will be a Type III Mound. The Mound Soil Absorption Area is design for 183‐sqft (8’ x  20.9’).  The Mound Soil Absorption Area has been reduced to fit the Absorption Area on the available land  space and to avoid the need for Type II ‐ Holding Tanks.  The Mound Soil Absorption Area is designed to receive 70% of a Daily Average Flow of 220 GPD.  The Daily  Flow will be set to only allow 150 GPD to enter the mound within a 24‐hour period.  The size of the system  was designed to fit a 10’ x 25’ area for treatment and absorption.  Additionally, to reduce the overall width of the system, the design will include two specific design  adaptations for the construction of the mound.    1.Dig out the Fine Sand soil horizons to an elevation of 949.0’. Replace dugout soil with washed mound sand. 2.Build a box mound for the mound sand and absorption area above the finished ground elevation to reduce the width of the system. The minimum required materials for the sewer line, distribution network, pumps, supply line, sand, rock, fill, and cover  are detailed in the design worksheets included with this design.   Actual values may change slightly and will need to be  field verified for correctness.  Time Dose Control Panel  A time‐dosing control panel must be installed to operate all dosing pump cycles.  The panel must include  the ability to record cycle events and set the cycle intervals to specified On and Off times.    Site Specific Notes  1. The location of the new mound and sewage tanks will not be able to meet setbacks from property line (10').  Approval from the City of Scandia is required prior to submittal to  Washington County to receive a permit. Prepared by KSD @ 2020 www.ksd‐mn.com Page | 2  2.The soil under the Soil Absorption Area (8' wide x 22.9') long will be dugout and replaced with washed mound sand to the depth of the Medium Sand horizon. See Site Plan for details. 3.Trees will need to be removed. 4.Property examined for Type I. No suitable soil or available space found. 5.Sewage Tanks must be > 75’ from OHW. Construction Notes  Building Permit requirements.  No construction shall be allowed by any local unit of government until the permit required for the  subsurface sewage treatment system has been issued.   Site Protection.  Prior to and during construction or lot improvements, the proposed initial and replacement soil treatment  and dispersal areas shall be protected from disturbance, compaction, or other damage by use of stakes and  silt fence or snow fence.  MR 7080.2100, Subpart 1. F  Electrical installations must comply with applicable laws and ordinances including the most current codes,  rules, and regulations of public authorities having jurisdiction and with part 1315.0200, which incorporates  the National Electrical Code.  As‐Built Drawing  The Licensed Installer must provide an As‐Built of the final location of all components.  The attached Site  Plan is only for reference and should not be considered as final survey or location of system components.  Protection from Freezing for Supply Line  The Mound supply line must drain back and empty pipe after each dose.  To avoid potential freezing,  additional depth or insulation may be necessary to keep line from freezing if buried too shallow.  Soil Erosion & Protection from Freezing  The dispersal area must have seed and grass established throughout the excavated areas to maintain  proper protection from soil erosion and freezing.  12050 196th st N, Scandia, MN 0 20 4010 ft 0 7 143.5 m 1:2 50 Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search,appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. 3'-0"50' from Deep Well 5'-4" 1 , 0 0 0 - g a l 1 , 5 0 0 - g a l Spike Nailed in Power Pole BM=949.9' Proposed Location of Tanks **Installer may choose a different location** HOUSE Kloeppner Services & Designs, LLC Lic # 4043 Approved by: Jesse Kloeppner Date - 10/22/20 LEGEND: W = Well SB = Soil Boring SP = Soil Pit = Benchmark NORTH NOTES: 1. New Tanks: 1,500-gal Two-Compartment; 1,000-gal Pump Tank. 2. The Design Flow for the Soil Treatment area was reduced from 300 gallons per day (GPD) to 220 GPD to fit landspace available. 3. The location of the new mound and sewage tanks will not be able to meet all setbacks from property line (10'). Approval from the City of Scandia is required prior to submittal to Washington County to receive a permit. 4. The soil under the Soil Absorption Area (8' wide x 22.9') long will be dugout and replaced with washed mound sand to the depth of the Medium Sand horizon. See Site Plan for details. 5. Trees will need to be removed. 6. The new septic system will be placed on newly acquired ground, not over the existing system. - THIS IS ONLY A SITE PLAN - ALL SEPTIC LOCATIONS AND MEASUREMENTS ARE ONLY ESTIMATES - AS-BUILT WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED BY INSTALLER AFTER CONSTRUCTION MOUND DIMENSIONS Rockbed - 8' x 22.9' Absorption Bed - 10' x 24.9' Total Mound - 10' x 24.9' Digout Soil to Medium Sand Horizon Upslope Elev. - 949.0' Min: Sand Height - 36" @ 952.0' Rockbed Laterals Elev. - 952.8' Height @ Crown Elev. - 954.3' LATERALS 3 - Laterals @ 20.9' of 1-1/2" SCH40 Spacing - 3' - Drilled Holes - 3/16" NW - 951.2' SB1 - 952.1' NE - 952.3' SB2 - 952.1' SW - 951.0' SB3 - 951.1' SE - 952.2' SP1 - 951.2' CONSTRUCTION & PUMPER ACCESS SB1 SP1 SB3 SB2 5% slope 12' - 2" SCH40 PIPE INV 946.3' Ground Elev. 950.8 Digout Fine Sand to Medium Sand Horizon at Elevation of 949.0' Install Effluent Screen at Outlet Approx. Invert Outlet - 948.0'41' - 4" SCH40 PIPEGARAGE10'-6"7'-1"4% slope Abandon Existing Drainfield & Tanks 2' - 0 "10'-1"9'-3"8'-2" 2 6 ' - 0 "22'-0"2 8 ' - 0 "3'-0"3' - 0 " DISPERSAL BE D ABSORPTIO N A R E A ABSORPTION A R E A 25'-0"10'-0" 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 3 ' - 0 " 5'-4" INV. 945.9'6'-8"75' from OHW7 5 ' - 0 " Ordinary High Water (OHW)Ordinary High Water(OHW)942.2' 1' - 0 " INV. 945.9' Preliminary Evaluation Worksheet 1. Contact Information v 04.01.2020 Property Owner/Client: Site Address: Legal Description: Parcel ID: SEC: TWP: RNG: A. Client-Provided Information Project Type: Project Use: Residential use:# Bedrooms: Dwelling Sq.ft.: Unfinished Sq. Ft.: # Adults: # Children: # Teenagers: In-home business (Y/N): If yes, describe: * Clear water source - should not go into system Additional current or future uses: Anticipated non-domestic waste: The above is complete & accurate: B. Designer-determined flow Information Attach additional information as necessary. Design Flow: GPD Anticipated Waste Type: BOD: mg/L TSS mg/L Oil & Grease mg/L 3. Preliminary Site Information A. Water Supply Wells 1 2 3 4 Client signature & date 300 <25<60<170 Confining Layer STA Setback 50' Source MN Well Index Residential 2 Project ID: 32 2029 Robert & Debra Davies Date Completed: No Water-using devices: (check all that apply) 9/14/2020 2. Flow and General System Information 29.032.20.14.0009 12050 196th St N, Scandia, MN 55073 THAT PART OF GOVERNMENT LOT 3, SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE 20, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 9, BLOCK 2, OF THE RECORDED PLAT OF BECKSTROM ADDITION; THENCE SOUTH 36 DEGREES 17 MINUTES WEST ASSUMING THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF SAID LOT #DescriptionMn. ID# Well Depth (ft.) Casing Depth (ft.) 12070 196th St 107146 170 Additional Well Information: 147 New Construction Replacement Residential Other Establishment: Garbage Disposal/Grinder Large Bathtub >40 gallons Self-Cleaning Humidifier* Water Softener*Sump Pump* High Eff. Furnace* Hot Tub* Iron Filter* Repair Clothes Washing Machine Sewage pump in basement Other: Dishwasher Expansion Preliminary Evaluation Worksheet Site within 200' of noncommunity transient well (Y/N) Yes, source: Site within a drinking water supply management area (Y/N) Yes, source: Site in Well Head Protection inner wellhead management zone (Y/N) Yes, source: Buried water supply pipes within 50 ft of proposed system (Y/N) B. Site located in a shoreland district/area?Yes, name: Elevation of ordinary high water level: ft Source: Classification: Tank Setback: ft. STA Setbk: ft. C. Site located in a floodplain?Yes, Type(s): Floodplain designation/elevation (10 Year): ft Source: Floodplain designation/elevation (100 Year): ft Source: D. Property Line Id / Source: E. ID distance of relevant setbacks on map: Map Units: Slope Range: % List landforms: Landform position(s): Parent materials: Depth to Bedrock/Restrictive Feature: in Depth to Watertable: in Septic Tank Absorption Field- At-grade: Septic Tank Absorption Field- Mound: Septic Tank Absorption Field- Trench: Name of LGU: LGU Contact: LGU-specific setbacks: LGU-specific design requirements: LGU-specific installation requirements: Notes: 3-9159B; Anoka loamy fine sand No 4. Preliminary Soil Profile Information From Web Soil Survey (attach map & description) No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No No No 5. Local Government Unit Information 75' from Recreational Development Lakes Septic Tanks: 1-bedroom = 3,000-gal >80 outwash plains backslope outwash Moderately Limited Moderately Limited Map Unit Ratings Washington County Public Health & Environment - 651-430-6655 >80 Not Limited Survey Plat Map Property Lines Other:OHWL EasementsWater Well(s) Building(s) Owner County GIS Other Field Evaluation Worksheet 1. Project Information Site Address: Utility Locations Identified Locate and Verify (see Site Evaluation map ) Landscape position: Percent slope: % Slope shape: Slope direction: Describe the flooding or run-on potential of site: Describe the need for Type III or Type IV system: Note: Proposed soil treatment area protected? (Y/N): If yes, describe: If yes, describe: Soil observations were conducted in the proposed system location (Y/N): A soil observation in the most limiting area of the proposed system (Y/N): Number of soil observations: Soil observation logs attached (Y/N): Percolation tests performed & attached (Y/N): in ft *Most Restrictive Depth Identified from List Below Periodically saturated soil: in ft Soil Texture: Standing water: in ft Percolation Rate: min/inch Bedrock: in ft Soil Hyd Loading Rate:gpd/ft2 Benchmark Elevation: ft Elevations and Benchmark on map? (Y/N): Benchmark Elevation Location: Differences between soil survey and field evaluation: Site evaluation issues / comments: Anticipated construction issues:The mound and tanks will not be able to meet all setbacks for property line and buildings. Trees will need to be removed. The mound absorption area will be dug out to add mound sand. Stakes Filled, Compacted, Disturbed areas (Y/N): 4. General Soils Information Top of Spike on Power Pole (See Map) 1.2 100.0 Yes 26 949.0 Project ID: Vegetation type(s): Lawn Shoulder Linear, Linear 2. Utility and Structure Information 3. Site Information 5 Reduced STA to fit available space. medium sand Yes 4 No Yes 5. Phase I. Reporting Information Elevation 949.0 Depth 26 Limiting Condition*: v 04.01.2020 No Yes northwest Yes Date Completed: 10/7/202012050 196th St N, Scandia, MN 55073 Property Owner/Client:Robert & Debra Davies Gopher State One Call #Any Private Utilities: Existing Buildings Improvements Easements Setbacks Project ID:Client:Soil parent material(s): (Check all that apply)Landscape Position: (select one) Slope %: 4.0 Slope shape 954.1Vegetation:948.3DateShape Grade10YR 4/310YR 4/310YR 4/410YR 5/410YR 7/1 2.5Y 5/8 Concentrations S110YR 8/1 Depletions S2CommentsI hereby certify that I have completed this work in accordance with all applicable ordinances, rules and laws.L4043(License #)Soil Observation Log v 04.01.2020Robert & Debra DaviesLocation / Address: 12050 196th St N, Scandia, MN 55073Shoulder Linear, LinearElevation-relative to benchmark:Lawn Soil survey map units: 159B; Anoka loamy fine sand Limiting Layer Elevation:Weather Conditions/Time of Day: Sunny 3:30 PM 10/07/20Observation #/Location:SB1 See Map Observation Type: AugerIndicator(s)I-------- Structure-----------IConsistence0-10Very Fine Sand0%Single grain Structureless LooseDepth (in) TextureRock Frag. %Matrix Color(s) Mottle Color(s) Redox Kind(s)Loose10-28 Fine Sand 0%Single grain Structureless Loose28-36 Sand 0%Single grain StructurelessFirm36-46 Sand 5%Single grain Structureless Loose46-55Sandy Clay Loam5%Blocky ModerateLimiting Layer = 46"Jesse Kloeppner10/7/2020(Designer/Inspector) (Signature) (Date)OutwashLacustrineLoessTillAlluviumBedrockOrganic Matter Project ID:Client:Soil parent material(s): (Check all that apply)Landscape Position: (select one) Slope %: 4.0 Slope shape 952.1Vegetation:949.0DateShape Grade10YR 4/210YR 4/410YR 5/410YR 7/2 10YR 5/8 Concentrations S12.5Y 8/1 Depletions S2CommentsI hereby certify that I have completed this work in accordance with all applicable ordinances, rules and laws.L4043(License #)Limiting Layer = 37"Jesse Kloeppner10/7/2020(Designer/Inspector) (Signature) (Date)Loose37-48 Sand 0%Single grain StructurelessLoose26-37 Sand 0%Single grain Structureless Loose10-26 Fine Sand 0%Single grain StructurelessRedox Kind(s) Indicator(s)I-------- Structure-----------IConsistence0-10Loamy Fine Sand0%Single grain Structureless LooseDepth (in) TextureRock Frag. %Matrix Color(s) Mottle Color(s)Weather Conditions/Time of Day: Sunny 3:15 PM 10/07/20Observation #/Location:SB2 See Map Observation Type: AugerShoulder Linear, LinearElevation-relative to benchmark:Lawn Soil survey map units: 159B; Anoka loamy fine sand Limiting Layer Elevation:Soil Observation Log v 04.01.2020Robert & Debra DaviesLocation / Address: 12050 196th St N, Scandia, MN 55073OutwashLacustrineLoessTillAlluviumBedrockOrganic Matter Project ID:Client:Soil parent material(s): (Check all that apply)Landscape Position: (select one) Slope %: 4.0 Slope shape 951.1Vegetation:949.0DateShape Grade10YR 4/310YR 4/410YR 6/2 2.5Y 5/8 Concentrations S110YR 8/2 Depletions S110YR 7/2 2.5Y 5/8 Concentrations S2CommentsI hereby certify that I have completed this work in accordance with all applicable ordinances, rules and laws.L4043(License #)Soil Observation Log v 04.01.2020Robert & Debra DaviesLocation / Address: 12050 196th St N, Scandia, MN 55073Shoulder Linear, LinearElevation-relative to benchmark:Lawn Soil survey map units: 159B; Anoka loamy fine sand Limiting Layer Elevation:Weather Conditions/Time of Day: Sunny 3:40 PM 10/07/20Observation #/Location:SB3 See Map Observation Type: AugerIndicator(s)I-------- Structure-----------IConsistence0-12Loamy Fine Sand0%Single grain Structureless LooseDepth (in) TextureRock Frag. %Matrix Color(s) Mottle Color(s) Redox Kind(s)Loose12-26 Fine Sand 0%Single grain Structureless Loose26-30 Sand 0%Single grain Structureless30-40 Sand 5%Single grain Structureless LooseLimiting Layer = 26"Jesse Kloeppner10/7/2020(Designer/Inspector) (Signature) (Date)OutwashLacustrineLoessTillAlluviumBedrockOrganic Matter Project ID:Client:Soil parent material(s): (Check all that apply)Landscape Position: (select one) Slope %: 4.0 Slope shape 951.2Vegetation:949.0DateShape Grade10YR 4/310YR 4/410YR 5/42.5Y 7/2 2.5Y 5/8 Concentrations S110YR 8/1 Depletions S2CommentsI hereby certify that I have completed this work in accordance with all applicable ordinances, rules and laws.L4043(License #)Limiting Layer = 27"Jesse Kloeppner10/7/2020(Designer/Inspector) (Signature) (Date)Loose30-40 Sand 5%Single grain StructurelessLoose24-27 Sand 5%Single grain Structureless Loose12-24 Fine Sand 0%Single grain StructurelessRedox Kind(s) Indicator(s)I-------- Structure-----------IConsistence0-12Loamy Fine Sand0%Single grain Structureless LooseDepth (in) TextureRock Frag. %Matrix Color(s) Mottle Color(s)Weather Conditions/Time of Day: Sunny 3:50 PM 10/07/20Observation #/Location:SP1 See Map Observation Type: PitShoulder Linear, LinearElevation-relative to benchmark:Lawn Soil survey map units: 159B; Anoka loamy fine sand Limiting Layer Elevation:Soil Observation Log v 04.01.2020 Location / Address: 12050 196th St N, Scandia, MN 55073OutwashLacustrineLoessTillAlluviumBedrockOrganic Matter Textures:CClayCoSiC Silty ClayMSC Sandy ClayFCL Clay LoamVFSiCL Silty Clay LoamSCL Sandy Clay LoamSi SiltSiL Silt LoamSubsoil Indicator(s) of Saturation:LLoamS1. Distinct gray or red redox featuresSL Sandy Loam*S2. Depleted matrix (value >/=4 and chroma </=2)LS Loamy Sand*S3. 5Y chroma </= 3SSand*S4. 7.5 YR or redder faint redox concentrations or redox depletionsShape:Slope Shape:Grade:Poorly formed, indistinct peds, barely observable in placeNo observable aggregates, or no orderly arrangement of natural lines of weaknessConsistence:Fine T3. Organic texture or organic modifiersVery Fine*Sand Modifiers: Topsoil Indicator(s) of Saturation:Coarse T1. Wetland VegetationMedium T2. Depressional LandscapeT4. N 2.5/ 0 colorT5. Redox features in topsoilGranularThe peds are approximately spherical or polyhedral and are commonly found in topsoil. These are the small, rounded peds that hang onto roots when soil is turned over.BlockyThe peds are block-like or polyhedral, and are bounded by flat or slightly rounded surface that are castings of the faces of surrounding peds. Blocky structure is commonly found in the lower topsoil and subsoil.PlatyThe peds are flat and plate like. They are oriented horizontally and are usually overlapping. Platy structure is commonly found in forested areas just below the leaf litter or shallow topsoil.T6. Hydraulic indicatorsWeakModerateWell formed, distinct peds, moderately durable and evident, but not distinct in undisturbed soilLooseNo peds, sandy soilSlope shape is described in two directions: up and down slope (perpendicular to the contour), and across slope (along the horizontal contour); e.g. Linear, Convex or LV'. Single GrainThe structure found in a sandy soil. The individual particles are not held together.PrismaticFlat or slightly rounded vertical faces bound the individual peds. Peds are distinctly longer vertically, and faces are typically casts or molds of adjoining peds. Prismatic structure is commonly found in the lower subsoil.RigidFoot pressureStrongDurable peds that are quite evident in un-displaced soil, adhere weakly to one another, withstand displacement, and become separated when soil is disturbedMassiveLooseIntact specimen not availableFirmModerate force between fingersFriableSlight force between fingersExtremely FirmModerate force between hands or slight foot pressure Design Summary Page 1. PROJECT INFORMATION v 04.01.2020 Property Owner/Client: Project ID: Site Address: Date: 2. DESIGN FLOW & WASTE STRENGTH Attach data / estimate basis for Other Establishments Design Flow: GPD Anticipated Waste Type: BOD: mg/L TSS: mg/L Oil & Grease: mg/L Treatment Level: Select Treatment Level C for residential septic tank effluent 3. HOLDING TANK SIZING Minimum Capacity: Residential =400 gal/bedroom, Other Establishment = Design Flow x 5.0, Minimum size 1000 gallons Code Minimum Holding Tank Capacity: Gallons in Tanks or Compartments Recommended Holding Tank Capacity: Gallons in Tanks or Compartments Type of High Level Alarm: (Set @ 75% tank capacity) Comments: 4. SEPTIC TANK SIZING A. Residential dwellings: Number of Bedrooms (Residential): Code Minimum Septic Tank Capacity: Gallons in Tanks or Compartments Recommended Septic Tank Capacity: Gallons in Tanks or Compartments Effluent Screen & Alarm (Y/N): Model/Type: B. Other Establishments: Waste received by: Days Hyd. Retention Time Code Minimum Septic Tank Capacity: Gallons In Tanks or Compartments Recommended Septic Tank Capacity: Gallons In Tanks or Compartments Effluent Screen & Alarm (Y/N): Model/Type: 5. PUMP TANK SIZING Pump Tank 1 Capacity (Minimum): Gal Pump Tank 2 Capacity (Minimum): Gal Pump Tank 1 Capacity (Recommended): Gal Pump Tank 2 Capacity (Recommended): Gal Pump 1 GPM Total Head ft Pump 2 GPM Total Head ft Supply Pipe Dia. 2.00 in Dose Vol: gal Dose Vol: Gal 10/13/2012050 196th St N, Scandia, MN 55073 1500 2 Robert & Debra Davies 2 1500 1000 9.0 Supply Pipe Dia. 300 Residential <170 13.1 <60 <25 C GPD x 500 2 Yes PolyLok 525 50.0 Design Summary Page 6. SYSTEM AND DISTRIBUTION TYPE Soil Treatment Type: Distribution Type: Elevation Benchmark: ft Benchmark Location: MPCA System Type: Distribution Media: Type III/IV Details: 7. SITE EVALUATION SUMMARY: Describe Limiting Condition: Layers with >35% Rock Fragments? (yes/no) No Note: Depth Elevation of Limiting Condition Limiting Condition: inches 2.2 ft ft Minimum Req'd Separation: inches 3.0 ft Critical for system compliance Code Max System Depth: inches -0.8 ft ft This is the maximimum depth to the bottom of the distribution media for required separation. Negative Depth (ft) means it must be a mound. Soil Texture: Soil Hyd. Loading Rate:GPD/ft2 Percolation Rate: MPI Contour Loading Rate: Note: Measured Land Slope: % Note: Comments: 8. Trench: Dispersal Area ft2 Sidewall Depth in Trench Width ft Total Lineal Feet ft No. of Trenches Code Max. Trench Depth in Contour Loading Rate ft Length ft Designed Trench Depth in Bed: Dispersal Area ft2 Sidewall Depth in Maximum Bed Depth in Bed Width ft Bed Length ft Designed Bed Depth in Mound: Dispersal Area ft2 Bed Length ft Bed Width ft Absorption Width ft Clean Sand Lift ft Berm Width (0-1%) ft Upslope Berm Width ft Downslope Berm ft Endslope Berm Width ft Total System Length ft System Width ft Contour Loading Rate gal/ft9.6 1.0 10.0 1.0 8.0 5.0 Type III 183.3 22.9 8.0 0.0 24.9 1.20 SOIL TREATMENT AREA DESIGN SUMMARY Depth 26 949.00 Pressure Distribution-Level Top of Spike on Power Pole (See M Project ID: If yes, describe below: % rock and layer thickness, amount of soil credit and any additional information for addressing the rock fragments in this design. Mound sized reduced to fit available space. 100 1.0 Redoximorphic Features/Saturated Soils 36 Mound 952.00 10 Mound Rock medium sand Elevation Design Summary Page At-Grade: Bed Width ft Bed Length ft Finished Height ft Contour Loading Rate gal/ft Upslope Berm ft Downslope Berm ft Endslope Berm ft System Length ft System Width ft Level & Equal Pressure Distribution No. of Laterals Perforation Spacing ft Perforation Diameter in Lateral Diameter in Min Dose Volume gal Max Dose Volume gal 9. A.Starting BOD Concentration = Design Flow X Starting BOD (mg/L) X 8.35 ÷ 1,000,000 = lbs. BOD/day B.Target BOD Concentration = Design Flow X Target BOD (mg/L) X 8.35 ÷ 1,000,000 = lbs. BOD/day Lbs. BOD To Be Removed: PreTreatment Technology: *Must Meet or Exceed Target Disinfection Technology: *Required for Levels A & B C.Organic Loading to Soil Treatment Area: mg/L X gpd x 8.35 ÷ 1,000,000 ÷ ft2 =lbs./day/ft2 10. Comments/Special Design Considerations: I hereby certify that I have completed this work in a ccordance with all applicable ordinances, rules and laws. Project ID: (Date)(Designer) (Signature) Jesse Kloeppner L4043 10/13/20 gpd X mg/L X 8.35 ÷ 1,000,00 (License #) 1. New Tanks: 1,500-gal Two-Compartment; 1,000-gal Pump Tank. 2. The Design Flow for the Soil Treatment area was reduced from 300 gallons per day (GPD) to 220 GPD to fit landspace available. 3. The location of the new mound and sewage tanks will not be able to meet all setbacks from property line (10') and new buildings. Approval from the City of Scandia is required prior to submittal to Washington County to receive a permit. 4. The soil under the Soil Absorption Area (8' wide x 22.9') long will be dugout and replaced with washed mound sand to the depth of the Medium Sand horizon. See Site Plan for details. 5. Trees will need to be removed. gpd X mg/L X 8.35 ÷ 1,000,00 Additional Info for At-Risk, HSW or Type IV Design 3 3/16 75281.50 3 1. SYSTEM SIZING: A. Design Flow :GPD B.Soil Loading Rate:GPD/ft2 C.Depth to Limiting Condition: ft D.Percent Land Slope: % E.Design Media Loading Rate:GPD/ft2 F.Mound Absorption Ratio: 2. DISPERSAL MEDIA SIZING A.Calculate Dispersal Bed Area: Design Flow (1.A) ÷ Design Media Loading Rate GPD/ft2 =ft2 ft2 B.Enter Dispersal Bed Width: ft Can not exceed 10 feet. C.Calculate Contour Loading Rate: Bed Width X Design Media Loading Rate ft2 X GPD/ft 2 =gal/ft Can not exceed Table 1 D.Calculate Minimum Dispersal Bed Length: Dispersal Bed Area ÷ Bed Width ft2 ÷ ft = ft 3. ABSORPTION AREA SIZING A.Calculate Absorption Width: Bed Width X Mound Absorption Ratio ft X = ft B.For slopes from 0 to 1%, the Absorption Width is measured from the bed equally in both directions. Absorption Width Beyond the Bed: Absorption Width - Bed Width ÷ 2 ( ft - ft) ÷ 2 =ft Mound Design Worksheet <1% Slope 220 1.2 1.2 1.00 Project ID: GPD ÷ 220 1.20 2.2 0.0 *Systems with these values are not Type I systems. Contour Loading Rate (linear loading rate) is a recommended value. 183 v 04.01.2020 8.0 If a larger dispersal media area is desired, enter size: 8 8 22.9183 8.0 81.2 9.6 8.0 8.0 1.0 0.0 4. DISTRIBUTION MEDIA: ROCK A. in ft 5. DISTRIBUTION MEDIA: REGISTERED TREATMENT PRODUCTS: CHAMBERS AND EZFLOW A.Enter Dispersal Media: B.Enter the Component: Length: ft Width: ft Depth: ft C.Number of Components per Row = Bed Length divided by Component Length (Round up) ft ÷ ft = components/row D.Actual Bed Length = Number of Components/row X Component Length: components X E.Number of Rows = Bed Width divided by Component Width ft ÷ ft = rows Adjust width so this is a whole number. F.Total Number of Components = Number of Components per Row X Number of Rows X=components 6. MOUND SIZING A.Calculate Clean Sand Lift: 3 feet minus Depth to Limiting Condition = Clean Sand Lift (1 ft minimum) 3.0 ft - ft = ft Design Sand Lift (optional): ft B.Upslope Height = Clean Sand Lift + Depth of Media + Depth to Cover Pipe + Depth of Cover (1 ft) ft + ft + ft + ft = ft C.Berm Width = Upslope Mound Height X 4 (4 is recommended, but could be 3-12) ft X ft = ft D.Total Landscape Width = Berm Width + Dispersal Bed Width + Berm Width ft + ft + ft = ft E.Additional Berm Width necessary for absorption - Absorption Width - Total Landscape Width ft - ft = ft if number is negative (<0), value is ZERO F.Final Berm Width = Additional Berm Width + Berm Width ft + ft = ft G.Total Mound Width = Final Berm Width + Dispersal Bed Width + Final Berm Width ft + ft + ft = ft H.Total Mound Length = Final Berm Width + Dispersal Bed Length + Final Berm Width ft + ft + ft = ft I.Setbacks from the Bed: Absorption Width - Dispersal Bed Width divided by 2 (ft -) /2=ft 2.2 8.0 8.0 10.01.0 1.0 1.022.91.0 10.0 0 1.0 0 1.0 1.01.00 1.0 8.0 24.9 1.0 1.0 1.01.0 10.0 0.001.0 0.3 8.0 8.0 1.0 ft = Check registered product information for specific application and design Rock Depth Below Distribution Pipe Project ID: 7. MOUND DIMENSIONS Comments: 1. See attached Mound Design Worksheet - Box Mound for additional details. 2. The Design Flow was changed from 300 gallons per day (GPD) to 220 GPD to fit landspace available. 3. The soil under the 8' wide x 22.9' long Soil Absorption Area will be dugout and replaced with washed mound sand to Medium Sand horizon. 4. The attached Mound Materials Worksheet may not be accurate. Top soil may not be used to cover top of mound. Project ID: Upslope Downslope EndslopeEndslope Total  Mound Width Total  Mound Length  Absorption Width  Depth to Limiting Limiting Condition Upslope berm Downslope berm  Clean sand lift (6.A) 18" cover on top 4" inspection pipe Dispersal Bed X 22.98 v 04.01.2020 A.Rock Volume : (Rock Below Pipe + Rock to cover pipe (pipe outside dia + ~2 inch)) X Bed Length X Bed Width = Volume (in + 3.0 ft X ft =ft3 Divide ft3 by 27 ft3/yd3 to calculate cubic yards: ft 3 ÷ 27 =yd3 Add 30% for constructability: yd3 X 1.3 =yd3 B.Calculate Clean Sand Volume: Volume Under Rock bed : Average Sand Depth x Media Width x Media Length = cubic feet ft X ft X ft =ft3 For a Mound on a slope from 0-1% Volume from Length = ((Upslope Mound Height - 1) X Absorption Width Beyond Bed X Media Bed Length) ft - 1)X Xft= Volume from Width = ((Upslope Mound Height - 1) X Absorption Width Beyond Bed X Media Bed Width) ft - 1)X Xft= Total Clean Sand Volume : Volume from Length + Volume from Width + Volume Under Media ft3 + ft 3 + ft 3 = ft 3 For a Mound on a slope greater than 1% Upslope Volume : ((Upslope Mound Height - 1 ) x 3 x Bed Length ) ÷ 2 = cubic feet (( ft - 1) X ) ÷ 2 =ft3 Downslope Volume : ((Downslope Height - 1) x Downslope Absorption Width x Media Length ) ÷ 2 = cubic feet (( ft - 1) X ft X ) ÷ 2 =ft3 Endslope Volume : (Downslope Mound Height - 1) x 3 x Media Width = cubic feet ( ft - 1 ) X ft =ft3 Total Clean Sand Volume : Upslope Volume + Downslope Volume + Endslope Volume + Volume Under Media ft3 + ft 3 + ft 3 + ft 3 =ft3 Divide ft3 by 27 ft3/yd3 to calculate cubic yards: ft 3 ÷ 27 =yd3 Add 30% for constructability: yd3 X 1.3 =yd3 C.Calculate Sandy Berm Volume: Total Berm Volume (approx): ((Avg. Mound Height - 0.5 ft topsoil) x Mound Width x Mound Length) ÷ 2 (-)ft X ft X ) ÷ 2 =ft3 Total Mound Volume - Clean Sand volume -Rock Volume = cubic feet ft3 - ft 3 - ft 3 = ft 3 Divide ft3 by 27 ft3/yd3 to calculate cubic yards: ft 3 ÷ 27 =yd3 Add 30% for constructability: yd3 x 1.3 =yd3 D.Calculate Topsoil Material Volume: Total Mound Width X Total Mound Length X .5 ft ft X ft X 0.5 ft =ft3 Divide ft3 by 27 ft3/yd3 to calculate cubic yards: ft 3 ÷ 27 =yd3 Add 30% for constructability: yd3 x 1.3 =yd34.6 6.0 9.4 86.00 45.8 -178.9 195.3183.3333333 124.6 4.6 62.3 10.0 24.9 124.6 2.2 6.00 195.3 7.2 7.2 62.3 195.3 24.9 45.8 45.8 1.7 1.0 8.0 1.7 8.022.9 22.9 183.3 in ) ÷ 12 X -178.9 -6.6 -6.6 -8.6 1.0 0.5 10.0 3.0 ft X Mound Materials Worksheet 6.06.0 1.00 3.0 ft X 1.00 22.91666667 Project ID: v 04.01.2020 1. Media Bed Width:ft 2. Minimum Number of Laterals in system/zone = Rounded up number of [(Media Bed Width - 4) ÷ 3] + 1. [(laterals 3. Designer Selected Number of Laterals :laterals Cannot be less than line 2 (Except in at-grades) 4. Select Perforation Spacing :ft 5. Select Perforation Diameter Size:in 0.1875 6.Length of Laterals = Media Bed Length - 2 Feet. -2ft= ft Perforation can not be closer then 1 foot from edge. 7. Number of Perforation Spaces = ft ÷ ft = Spaces 8. Spaces + 1 =Perfs. Per Lateral 3- 4 ) ÷ 3] + 1 = Determine the Number of Perforation Spaces . Divide the Length of Laterals by the Perforation Spacing and round down to the nearest whole number. 67 63.020.9 Number of Perforations per Lateral is equal to 1.0 plus the Number of Perforation Spaces . Check table below to verify the number of perforations per lateral guarantees less than a 10% discharge variation. The value is double with a center manifold. Pressure Distribution Design Worksheet 10 Does not apply to at-grades Perforations Per Lateral = 3.00 Project ID: 3 3/16 10 22.9 20.9 Pressure Distribution Design Worksheet 9. Perf. Per Lat. X Number of Perf. Lat. = Total Number of Perf. 10.ft 11. Select Type of Manifold Connection (End or Center): 12.Select Lateral Diameter (See Table):in 13.Calculate the Square Feet per Perforation. Recommended value is 4-11 ft2 per perforation, Does not apply to At-Grades a. Bed Area = Bed Width (ft) X Bed Length (ft) ft X ft = 229 ft2 b.Square Foot per Perforation = Bed Area ÷ by the Total Number of Perfs ft2 ÷ perf =ft2/perf 14. Select Minimum Average Head :ft 15. Select Perforation Discharge based on Table: GPM per Perf 16. Perfs X GPM per Perforation = GPM 17.Volume of Liquid Per Foot of Distribution Piping (Table II): Gallons/ft 18.Volume of Distribution Piping = X ft X gal/ft = Gallons 19. Minimum Delivered Volume = Volume of Distribution Piping X 4 Gallons Comments/Special Design Considerations: 10 21 23 End Spacing of laterals; Must be greater than 1 foot and no more than 3 feet: 3.0 7 Total Number of Perforations equals the Number of Perforations per Lateral multiplied by the Number of Perforated Laterals. 3 Flow Rate = Total Number of Perfs X Perforation Discharge. 0.41 1.0 10.921 1.50 gals X 4 = = [Number of Perforated Laterals X Length of Laterals X (Volume of Liquid Per Foot of Distribution Piping] 6.9 3 27.6 21 0.110 6.9 0.110 229 21 0.41 9 1. PUMP CAPACITY v 04.01.2020 A.If pumping to gravity enter the gallon per minute of the pump: GPM (10 - 45 gpm) B.GPM C.Enter pump description: A.ft B.ft C. D.in ft E. Friction Loss = F. ft X 1.25 = ft G. ft per 100ft X ft ÷ 100 = ft H.Total Head requirement is the sum of the Elevation Difference + Distribution Head Loss, + Additional Head Loss + Supply Friction Loss ft + ft + ft + ft = ft GPM with at least feet of total head. Basic Pump Selection Design Worksheet If pumping to a pressurized distribution system: 2. HEAD REQUIREMENTS Project ID: Pumping to Gravity or Pressure Distribution: 9.0 2.0 20 between pump and point of discharge: Distribution Head Loss: 5 Additional Head Loss: ft (due to special equipment, etc.) Equalization/Time Dosing Pressure 1. Supply Pipe Diameter: 2. Supply Pipe Length: Elevation Difference 8 0.1 Friction Loss in Plastic Pipe per 100ft from Table I: 0.26 ft per 100ft of pipe 20 25.0 Calculate Supply Friction Loss by multiplying Friction Loss Per 100ft by the Equivalent Pipe Length and divide by 100. Supply Friction Loss = 0.26 25.0 Comments: 8.0 5.0 13.10.1 Determine Equivalent Pipe Length from pump discharge to soil dispersal area discharge point. Estimate by adding 25% to supply pipe length for fitting loss. Supply Pipe Length X 1.25 = Equivalent Pipe Length 3. PUMP SELECTION A pump must be selected to deliver at least 9.0 13.1 v 04.01.2020 1. A.Design Flow (Design Sum.1A):GPD B. Tank Use: C. Percentge of Design Flow 50 % Gal Up to 75% design flow is normal for Design percentage D. Min. required pump tank capacity: Gal E. Recommended capacity: Gal 2. A. Tank Manufacturer: B. Tank Model: C. Capacity from manufacturer: Gallons D. Gallons per inch: Gallons per inch E. Liquid depth of tank from manufacturer: inches 3. ( in + 2 inches) X Gallons Per In = Gallons 4. -Item 18 of the Pressure Distribution or Item 11 of Non-level Gallons (minimum dose) inches/dose 5. Calculate Maximum Pumpout Volume (25% of Design Flow) Design Flow: GPD X 0.25 = Gallons (maximum dose) inches/dose 6.Gallons 7.Calculate Doses Per Day = Percentage Design Flow ÷ Delivered Volume Doses 8. Calculate Drainback: A.Diameter of Supply Pipe = inches B. Length of Supply Pipe = feet C.Volume of Liquid Per Lineal Foot of Pipe = Gallons/ft D.Drainback = Length of Supply Pipe X Volume of Liquid Per Lineal Foot of Pipe ft X gal/ft = Gallons 9.Total Dosing Volume = Delivered Volume plus Drainback gal + gal = Gallons 10.Working Storage Volume = Tank Volume -Volume to Cover Pump - Reserve Capacity gal - gal - =Gallons 11.Required Flow Rate : A. From Pump Curve - Must verify after Install: GPM* B. Calculated GPM = Change in Depth (in) x Gallons Per Inch / Time Interval in Minutes min = GPM 12.Select Flow Rate from Line 11.A or 11.B: GPM* 3.4 53 0.170 50 25.0 Minnesota Precast 1000 Gallon Pump Tank 1000 Note: Design calculations are based on this specific tank. Substituting a different tank model will change the pump float or timer settings. Contact designer if changes are necessary. 40.0 3.0 10 Select a pumpout volume that meets both Minimum and Maximum: (Pump and block height + 2 inches) X Gallons Per Inch Pump Tank Design Worksheet (Time Dose) 150 DETERMINE DOSING VOLUME 25.0 300 Minimum Delivered Volume = 4 X Volume of Distribution Piping: 28 300 75 50 1000 300 600 100 in X 25.0 gal/in ÷ 40.0 40 DETERMINE TANK CAPACITY AND DIMENSIONS Project ID: 300 500 150 20 0.170 3.4 2 20 gpd ÷ 50 Volume to Cover Pump (The inlet of pump should be 4 in from the bottom of the tank & 2 in covering the pump recommended) 3.0 1.1 gal = Dosing 1000 *Note: This value must be adjusted after installation based on pump calibration. Pump Tank Design Worksheet (Time Dose) NORMAL OPERATION TIMER SETTINGS* 13.Calculate TIMER ON setting*: Total Dosing Volume ÷ GPM HR MIN SEC gal ÷ Minutes ON*0 1.0 20 14.Calculated TIMER OFF setting*: Minutes Per Day (1440)/Doses Per Day - Minutes On HR MIN SEC 3min=Minutes OFF* 7 58.0 40 OPTIONAL PEAK ENABLE DOSING* - Desingers option for peak flow operation 15.Peak Percentage of Design Flow % 16.Peak Pump Volume that meets both Minimum and Maximum Volume gal + gal 17. gal HR MIN SEC 18. gal ÷ 40 gpm = min ON 0 1.0 20 HR MIN SEC 19. 3 1.3 min On min Off 7 58.0 40 20.Pump Off Float - Measuring from bottom of tank: Distance to set Pump Off Float=Gallons to Cover Pump / Gallons Per Inch: gal ÷ Inches 600 Gal 16.0 in 21.Alarm Float - Measuring from bottom of tank (90% recommended):100 Gal Distance to set Alarm Float = Tank Depth X % of Tank Depth (0.9 recommended) Inches 12.0 in 300 Gal 22.Reserve Capacity in gallons = (Tank Depth - Alarm Depth) X GPI ( = gallons Gal Alarm Depth 40.0 300 25.0 478.71440 min ÷ 1.3 Reserve Capacity Peak TIMER OFF:1440 min ÷ 40.0 in + 16.0 in) X 600.025.0 in X % = gal/in = 1640 Storage Capacity Normal Dose Volume Pump Off *Note: This value must be adjusted after installation based on pump calibration. 53 gpm = 1.3 53 3.450 DrainBack 50 Peak TIMER ON 1.353 Peak Dose Volume 53 doses/day - FLOAT SETTINGS 478.7 12.0 doses/day - 40.0 BOX MOUND DETAILS 1. SYSTEM SIZING: A.Design Flow : GPD B.Soil Loading Rate:GPD/ft2 C.Depth to Limiting Condition: ft D.Percent Land Slope: % E.Design Media Loading Rate:GPD/ft2 F.Mound Absorption Ratio: 2. DISPERSAL MEDIA SIZING A.Calculate Dispersal Bed Area: Design Flow (1.A) ÷ Design Media Loading Rate GPD/ft2 =ft2 ft2 B.Enter Dispersal Bed Width: ft Can not exceed 10 feet. C.Calculate Contour Loading Rate: Bed Width X Design Media Loading Rate ft2 X GPD/ft 2 =gal/ft Can not exceed Table 1 D.Calculate Minimum Dispersal Bed Length: Dispersal Bed Area ÷ Bed Width ft2 ÷ ft = ft 3. ABSORPTION AREA SIZING A.Calculate Absorption Width: Bed Width X Mound Absorption Ratio ft X = ft B.For slopes from 0 to 1%, the Absorption Width is measured from the bed equally in both directions. Absorption Width Beyond the Bed: Absorption Width - Bed Width ÷ 2 ( ft - ft) ÷ 2 =ft Mound Design Worksheet Box Mound 220 1.2 1.2 1.00 Project ID: GPD ÷ 220 0.60 0.0 1.0 *Systems with these values are not Type I systems. Contour Loading Rate (linear loading rate) is a recommended value. 183 v 04.01.2020 8.0 If a larger dispersal media area is desired, enter size: 8 8 22.9183 8.0 81.2 9.6 8.0 8.0 1.0 0.0 4. DISTRIBUTION MEDIA: ROCK A. in ft 5. DISTRIBUTION MEDIA: REGISTERED TREATMENT PRODUCTS: CHAMBERS AND EZFLOW A.Enter Dispersal Media: B.Enter the Component: Length: ft Width: ft Depth: ft C.Number of Components per Row = Bed Length divided by Component Length (Round up) ft ÷ ft = components/row D.Actual Bed Length = Number of Components/row X Component Length: components X E.Number of Rows = Bed Width divided by Component Width ft ÷ ft = rows Adjust width so this is a whole number. F.Total Number of Components = Number of Components per Row X Number of Rows X=components 6. MOUND SIZING A.Calculate Clean Sand Lift: 3 feet minus Depth to Limiting Condition = Clean Sand Lift (1 ft minimum) 3.0 ft - ft = ft Design Sand Lift (optional): ft B.Upslope Height = Clean Sand Lift + Depth of Media + Depth to Cover Pipe + Depth of Cover (1 ft) ft + ft + ft + ft = ft C.Berm Width = Upslope Mound Height X 4 (4 is recommended, but could be 3-12) ft X ft = ft D.Total Landscape Width = Berm Width + Dispersal Bed Width + Berm Width ft + ft + ft = ft E.Additional Berm Width necessary for absorption - Absorption Width - Total Landscape Width ft - ft = ft if number is negative (<0), value is ZERO F.Final Berm Width = Additional Berm Width + Berm Width ft + ft = ft G.Total Mound Width = Final Berm Width + Dispersal Bed Width + Final Berm Width ft + ft + ft = ft H.Total Mound Length = Final Berm Width + Dispersal Bed Length + Final Berm Width ft + ft + ft = ft I.Setbacks from the Bed: Absorption Width - Dispersal Bed Width divided by 2 (ft -) /2=ft 2.0 8.0 8.0 10.01.0 1.0 1.022.91.0 10.0 0 1.0 0 1.0 2.20.75 1.0 8.0 24.9 1.0 1.0 1.01.0 10.0 0.331.0 0.1 8.0 8.0 1.0 0.33 ft = Check registered product information for specific application and design 4 Rock Depth Below Distribution Pipe Project ID: 7. MOUND DIMENSIONS Comments: 1. The Design Flow was changed from 300 gallons per day (GPD) to 220 GPD to fit landspace available. 2. The soil under the 8' wide x 22.9' long Soil Absorption Area will be dugout and replaced with washed mound sand to Medium Sand horizon. 3. The attached Mound Materials Worksheet may not be accurate. Top soil may not be used to cover top of mound. Project ID: Upslope Downslope EndslopeEndslope Total  Mound Width Total  Mound Length  Depth to Limiting Limiting Condition Berm  Clean sand lift (6.A) 4" inspection pipe Dispersal Bed X 22.98 Berm  ALTERNATIVE DESIGN FOR MOUND SYSTEMS – VERTICAL SIDEWALL MOUNDS M. S. Wespetal* ABSTRACT Mound systems are used to overcome limitations imposed by seasonally saturated soils or bedrock. Mound systems are essentially a single pass, open bottom sand filter that provides both treatment and disposal of sewage tank effluent. Mound systems have proven to adequately treat and dispose of sewage in a reliable, cost-effective manner. However, mounds have been criticized, mainly by the public, for the large footprint required, poor aesthetics and the unusable lawn area resulting from the sharp rise in elevation. In addition, many existing sites with a seasonally saturated soil are too small to support the large footprint required for mound systems. To overcome these problems an alternative mound design is proposed that requires less footprint area and is more aesthetically pleasing. This vertical sidewall mound design is based on the perceived over-design of the absorption area and the additional unnecessary area needed to accommodate mound side-slopes. Evaluation of the standard mound design shows that the theory of pretreatment has not been applied. Specifically, the mound rock bed is designed on the development of a clogging mat and is sized at 5 cm/day (50 liters/meter2) in Minnesota. As the effluent passes out of the rock bed and into the sand, the BOD and TSS levels are substantially reduced, therefore a biological clogging mat should not form at the absorption area at the sand/natural soil interface. However, the sizing of the absorption area accounts for the development of a clogging mat. An examination of the literature indicates that the absorption area for pretreated effluents is similar to what is required for a mound rock bed. Therefore, in theory, a mound with vertical sidewalls should hydraulically function. Two types of vertical sidewall mounds were constructed and observed in Minnesota by licensed professional designers and installers. These vertical side wall mounds are much smaller and have enhanced aesthetics. This paper presents the theory behind the vertical sidewall mound, design parameters, construction methods and observations of performance by licensed professionals in Minnesota. KEYWORDS: Mounds, Septic Systems, Experimental Many areas of Minnesota and other parts of the country have soils with limited ability to treat and dispose of septic tank effluent due to bedrock or seasonally saturated soil. The frequent alternative of choice in these soil situations is the mound system. The mound system is an elevated system to achieve the required vertical separation for both treatment and hydraulic performance. In Minnesota, mound systems first appeared in the state code (Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080) in 1978 as an alternative system and was designated a standard system in 1989. Mound systems are widely accepted and used in Minnesota. Both real and perceived shortcomings to standard mound designs are described below: 1. The relatively large footprint area required (restricting their use on small lots). 2. Poor aesthetics and the unusable lawn area resulting from the sharp rise in elevation. 3. The public’s misconception that mounds do not work. 4. The need for a pump and controls. 5. The relatively high cost. The proposed vertical sidewall mound mitigates problems #1 and #2 and does not exacerbate problems #3 through #5. The concept of a vertical side wall mound was presented to approximately 400 licensed professional designers and installers in Minnesota during training workshops. From this, some designers and installers developed specific designs for vertical side wall mounds and installed them in areas that could not support a standard mound system. This paper reports the theory behind vertical side wall mounds, how vertical side wall mounds have been designed and used in Minnesota and reports the known performance of systems currently in use. * M.S. Wespetal, P.S.S. – Senior Hydrologist, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, St. Paul , MN 55155 MOUND DESIGN The current design for mound systems in Minnesota is very similar to those recommended by Converse and Tyler (1990) and that of the Wisconsin Department of Commerce Mound Component Manual (1998). The main design parameters for standard mounds in Minnesota include:  Flow amount is 568 L/bedroom/day (150 Gal/bedroom/day).  Minimum native soil requirement is 0.3 m (12”) of natural soil above seasonally saturated soil or bedrock with a percolation rate faster than 1.2 cm/hr.  Rock bed area is sized at a 5 cm/day loading (50 L/m2) [1.2 Gal/ft2) (based on domestic quality effluent)  Sand blanket depth required below the rock bed must result in a 0.9 m (36”) vertical separation, (the vertical separation can include the depth of suitable native soil).  Sand blanket must meet ASTM C-33 specifications.  Rock bed width is based a linear loading rate of 150 L/meter (3.7 Gal/ft) or less.  Upper edge of rock bed must be on the contour.  Pressure distribution is required.  Mound side-slopes must not be steeper than three horizontal units to one vertical unit and shall extend beyond the required absorption area, if necessary. Calculating Mound Absorption Area The absorption area is the area of native soil below the sand blanket required to absorb the septic tank effluent. It is determined by multiplying the absorption length by the absorption width. The absorption length is determined by the linear loading rate described by Converse and Tyler (1984) and Converse and Tyler (1990). The absorption width is determined by the relationship between the allowable loading rate to the sand blanket (50 L/meter2) versus the allowable loading rate to the native soil as seen in Column A in Table 1. A ratio of the allowable loading rate to the sand to the allowable loading rate to the soil is established to determine the width. For example, if the native soil is a loam the loading rate to a loam is 25 liter/m2. The ratio is determined by dividing 50 L/m2/day by 25 L/m2/day resulting in a ratio of 2.0 (Column B in Table 1). The rock bed width is multiplied by this ratio to determine the absorption width (Column C in Table 1). On flat sites the absorption area is centered under the rock bed (Fig. 1 A.). On sloping sites the rock bed is measured from the upslope edge of the rock bed and measured in the direction of the original land slope (Fig. 1 B.). Determining Total Footprint Area The total footprint area is the total area required for the final dimensions of the mound. Typically, it is determined by the minimum side-slope requirements of the mound system. In Minnesota, the minimum side-slope is a ratio of three horizontal units to one vertical unit (3:1). This has been chosen for ease of maintenance (mowing) and aesthetics. In many cases mounds are designed with a side-slope ratio of 4:1 for enhanced aesthetics. For flat and slightly sloping areas, the 3:1 side-slopes extend beyond the needed absorption area for most situations in Minnesota (Fig. 2). Table 1 column E gives the total footprint area that includes the upslope width, the side-slope widths and the down slope width. Table 1 clearly indicates that the 3:1 side-slope requirement is the determining factor for size of the final footprint for most situations in Minnesota. The required absorption area adds to the overall footprint on a low mound (0.3 m of sand below the rockbed due to 0.6 m of suitable native soil) placed on heavier textured soils. Table 1. Mound Design Factors for Absorption Width and 3:1 Side-slopes. Column A. Column B. Column C. Column D. Column E. Allowable loading rate to the native soil (L/m2/day) Ratio of rock bed width to absorption width. Absorption width based on 2.4 meter rock bed width (m) Total absorption area for a 3- bedroom dwelling. (m2) Total footprint for a 3 bedroom dwelling based on 3:1 sideslopes. (m2) Soil Texture sand 49 (13 gal) 1.0 2.4 (7.9’) 35 (376) 211 fine sand 24.5 2.0 4.8 70 211 sandy loam 32.6 1.5 3.6 53 211 loam 24.5 2.0 4.8 70 211 silt loam 20.4 2.4 5.8 84 211 clay loam 18.3 2.7 6.5 92 211 A. Flat site: B. Sloping site: Figure 1. Absorption width for a flat site (A.) and a sloping site (B.). The native soil texture is a loam with a allowable loading of 25 L/m2/day. Figure 2. Plan view comparing the absoption area versus the total footprint based on the 3:1 sideslope requirement. The depicted mound is designed for a three bedroom dwelling with 0.6 m thick sand blanket, on a 2% slope, with the percolation rate of the natural soil of 7.6 cm/hr (loam). PRETREATMENT THEORY It is has been documented that septic tank effluent, with it’s relatively high concentrations of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids (TSS) and fats, oils and grease (FOG) < 1% slope Total Footprint Absorption Area 2.4 m 14.3 m 3.4 m 2.4 m 2.4 m 21.1 m 3 1 24m 4.9m Absorption width 4.8 m Rockbed Native soil (loam) > 1% slope 3 1 Absorption width 4.8 m Rockbed Native soil (loam) 2.4 m 3.4 m Rockbed S l o p e 2.4 m 10.6 m creates a clogging mat at the distribution medium/soil surface which significantly reduces infiltration from the distribution medium (Siegrist, 1987, Siegrist et.al, 1984). Current research indicates that reducing BOD, TSS and FOG levels with secondary treatment eliminates or significantly reduces the formation of a clogging mat (Tyler and Converse, 1994). With a reduction or elimination of the clogging mat, the infiltration rate should significantly increase resulting in a reduction in the needed absorption area. In a mound system, the clogging mat forms at the rock/sand interface. The clogging mat and sand blanket “pretreat” the effluent by effectively removing a large percentage of the BOD, TSS and FOG. The effluent reaching the native soil surface should have significantly reduced contaminant levels and it could be safely assumed that little to no clogging mat will form at the sand/soil interface. However, the absorption ratios (Table 1 Column B) to determine the absorption area in mound systems are based on the assumption that a clogging mat will form at the sand/soil interface. Therefore, in theory, an open bottom vertical sidewall mound system should hydraulically perform. It should be noted that adequate treatment is not a concern with the vertical sidewall mound, because 0.9 m of vertical separation is still employed along with a reasonable loading rate to the sand. Box Mound Design Based on Pretreatment Theory The theory of pretreatment is used in vertical sidewall mound design. It is based on the theory that clean sand can percolate septic tank effluent at the same rate as the native soil can infiltrate secondary effluent. This theory holds true even for the slowest infiltration rate soil (clay loam) allowed to be used for a vertical sidewall mound. The absorption area proposed for vertical sidewall mounds is greater than recommend by Tyler and Converse (1994) for pretreated effluent for soil dispersal areas. Please refer to Table 2. Table 2. Comparisons of absorption areas between standard mounds and vertical sidewall mounds. The table is based on a vertical sidewall mound with a 2.4 m wide rock bed with an additional 0.3 m between the rock bed and the wall. Vertical sidewall mound absorption area (m2) Standard mound absorption area (m2) % reduction % reduction recommend by Tyler and Converse (1994) Soil Texture sand 45.5 35 30% (increase) 94 fine sand 45.5 70 35 72 sandy loam 45.5 53 14 88 loam 45.5 70 35 88 silt loam 45.5 84 46 88 clay loam 45.5 92 51 72 Total Footprint Area Reduction It can be seen from Table 1 column E that the 3:1 side-slope requirement is the main factor in the large footprint area for a standard mound. The total footprint area was derived by summing the upslope area, rockbed width and downslope width and multipling that amount by the sum of the rockbed length and the side widths (same as upslope dike widths). Below is a comparison of the total footprint area for a standard mound with a vertical sidewall mound for a 3-bedroom home with a 2.4 m wide rock bed with an additional 0.3 m between the rock bed and the wall. Table 3. Comparison of total footprint area of standard mound and box mound. Standard mound footprint (m2) vertical side wall mound footprint (m2) Percent Reduction 211 46 78 VERTICAL SIDEWALL MOUND DESIGN The vertical sidewall mound design is based on the same design theories and parameters as standard mound systems as described earlier, except as presented below: 1. The vertical sidewalls of the mound are placed 0.3m outside of the edge and ends of the rock bed to promote good oxygen transfer into the box and under the bed, to slightly increase the absorption area which could be helpful on the heavier textured soils, and for insulation in cold weather. 2. The walls are constructed out of treated dimension lumber, treated timbers, or decorative concrete blocks (Fig. 3). The walls should be internally supported to avoid future outward pressures and sagging. As with standard mounds, the system is placed on the contour (Fig. 4.) 3. A 0.07 to 0.14 mm polyetheline liner and 1.9 to 5 cm of insulation are added at the sidewalls to maintain higher temperatures in the winter months. 4. The rock bed thickness in a standard mound is approximately 31 to 33 cm [12” – 12.2”] (23 cm below the pipe, pipe thickness, and 5 cm above the pipe) The 23cm below the pipe is for storage and the 5 cm above the pipe is for protection from crushing. Both of these design parameters seem to be excessive (1.5 days of storage in the rockbed at design flow). For vertical side wall mounds it is recommended that only four inches of rock be placed below the pipe. This would still provide 1135 liters (2/3 of a day at design flow) and 1.3 days at the flow amounts actually produced by a dwelling. It is further recommended that only 2.5 cm of rock be placed above the pipe, since no driving on the box mound could crush the pipe. This would reduce the height of the mound by 18 cm (7 inches). 5. A total of 20 cm (8”) of topsoil, compost or decorative bark is placed over the top of the rock bed for frost protection and to grow plants if desired. Standard mounds are crowned to promote runoff, but in vertical side wall mounds are not. Crowning is not required for standard in- ground systems which appear not to have problems during precipitation events. A. B. Figure 3. Vertical side wall mounds constructed from decorative block (A.) and treated dimensioned lumber (B). Figure 4. vertical Sidewall mound placed on a contour. A graphical depiction of a box mound is provided in fig. 5. Figure 5. Cross section of a vertical sidewall mound using decorative concrete blocks. Monitoring and Mitigation In Minnesota, any non-standard system must have a monitoring and mitigation plan in the event the system fails. Since the vertical sidewall mound relies on 0.9 m (36”) of passive soil treatment only hydraulic monitoring is necessary. If the system is found to be weeping, the mitigation method is to increase the absorption area. This can be accomplished by constructing a much shorter box adjacent to the main box as seen in Fig. 6. Figure 6. A mitigation design for toe seepage from a box mound. Modified Vertical Sidewall Mound A modified vertical sidewall mound has been designed and installed in about 30 sites in Minnesota. The modification is to provide pretreatment before the rock bed using a customized aerobic treatment unit (ATU) to eliminate the formation of the clogging mat at the rock bed/sand interface. Pretreatment prior to distribution will allow a reduction in the size of the distribution medium. The distribution medium used in this design is corrugated gravelless leachbed pipe. The impetus for this Mottled Soil or Bedrock 0.14mm poly and 5 cm insulation 3 m or less Decorative concrete blocks Topsoil or mulch or 8 " 0.9m 0.3 m Rock bed Topsoil and/or compost or mulch 20 cm 0.3m Minimum ASTM C-33 Sand Pressure distribution pipes Native soil Topsoil or 8 type of design is to accommodate existing dwellings on very small lots whose only alternative was a holding tank. The design theory and concept is similar to vertical sidewall mounds receiving septic tank effluent. The customized ATU has positive filtration and removes some pathogenic organisms. This pathogen removal along with the sand blanket loaded at 245 l/m2/day or less should remove the remaining viruses. The thickness of the sand blanket meets the 0.9 m vertical separation distance. The footprint of the modified vertical sidewall mound is 2.4 m by 6.7 m for all soil conditions. A sand blanket (ASTM C-33) is used to meet a 0.9 m vertical separation distance. The distribution medium is two 6.1 m lengths of gravelless leachbed pipe. Newer designs have used only one gravelless leachbed pipe. The system uses pressure distribution by hanging a small diameter PVC pipe inside the leachbed pipe. The dosing volume is 76 liters per dose. The leachbed pipe is covered by compost materials. The modified vertical sidewall mounds built to date do not have a polyethelene barrier or insulation on the sidewalls. The systems were constructed by first installing the pressure line to the mound area. Next, the soil is scarified and the walls are constructed from outside the scarified area. The remaining construction is similar to standard mound construction practices as described in Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080. RESULTS Performance of Vertical Sidewall Mounds The concept of the vertical sidewall mounds was presented to septic system designers through training workshops without specifice design parameters. The initial use of such systems left to the discretion to individual designers and local units of government. Therefore, each system varies somewhat from the others. Currently three vertical sidewall mounds receive septic tank effluent and about 30 modified vertical sidewall mounds receive pretreated effluent. The oldest system is less than two years old. Since this was not a formal research project, no rigorous monitoring regime has been developed and implemented. To date none of the vertical sidewall mounds (modified or non-modified) have had toe seepage nor has freezing occured. Random temperature measurements of some reduced size vertical sidewall mounds during the winter of 1999/2000 in southern Minnesota indicated mound temperatures of 8.9o C. This winter was unusually mild. Cost of Vertical Sidewall Mounds Cost of vertical sidewall mounds is comparable to standard mounds in Minnesota. Much less sand is required (Table 4), however that cost savings is lost in cost of materials and labor for construction of the walls. Table 4. Comparison of sand quantities of standard mound, vertical side wall mound and modified vertical side wall mound for a 3 bedroom home, 0.61m thick sand blanket, 2.4m wide rockbed, less than 2 percent slope. System Type Sand quantity (cu/yds) Percent Reduction standard mound 70 N/A vertical side wall mound 29 59 modified vertical side wall mound 14 80 Vertical sidewall mounds which receive septic tank effluent where built in northern Minnesota and cost approximately $6,500 in with a standard grassed side-slope mound in that area costing about $6,300. Modified vertical sidewall mounds which receives pretreated effluent were built in southern Minnesota and cost approximately $13,000 (which includes the ATU cost). This $13,000 cost also includes customized landscaping costs, a three-year warranty and five years of monitoring which includes effluent sampling and chemical analysis. This cost compares to $10,000 for a standard grassed side-slope mound in southern Minnesota, which does not have monitoring and sampling costs. CONCLUSIONS The advantages and disadvantages with vertical sidewall mounds are as follows: Advantages - * Vertical side wall mounds are smaller and can fit on small lots with limiting soil conditions (Table 1.) * Vertical side wall mounds are more aesthetically pleasing (Figures 3 and 5). * Vertical side wall mounds saves the use of an additional pump over a buried sand filter with a pressurized trench system. * Vertical side wall mounds use much less sand (Table 4). Disadvantages- * At this time hydraulic performance has not been proven and the tendency to freeze is still unknow. * Vertical side wall mounds take longer to construct (unless long haul distance for sand). * Increased material cost for the vertical sidewalls. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to acknowledge and thank Doug Fessel – Fessel Septic Service, Ed and Brandon Melzark- Melzark Sewer and Excavation and George Rowell - R & B Septic Systems. REFERENCES 1. Bouma, J., J.C. Converse, R. J. Otis, W.G. Walker, and W.A. Ziebell. 1975. A mound system for on-site disposal of septic tank effluent in slowly permeable soils with seasonally perched water tables. In: J. Environmental Qual. 4. (3):382-388. 2. Converse, J. C. 1978. Design and construction manual for Wisconsin mounds. Small Scale Waste Management Project, Publication No. 15.5, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI. 3. Converse, J. C. and E.J. Tyler. 1990. Wisconsin mound soil absorption system siting, design and construction manual. Small Scale Waste Management Project Publication No. A 15.22 University of Wisconsin – Madison. 4. Converse, J. C. and E.J. Tyler. 1984. Wisconsin mounds for very difficult sites. In: Proceedings of the Fourth National Symposium of Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI. 5. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. 1999. Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080 – Individual Sewage Treatment Systems. The office of Revisor of Statutes, St.Paul, Minnesota 6. Siegrist, R. L. 1987. Hydraulic loading rates for soil absorption systems base on wastewater quality. In Proceedings of the Fifth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems. American Society of Agriculutral Engineers, St. Joseph MI. 7. Siegrist, R. L., D. L. Anderson, J.C. Converse. 1984. Commerical wastewater on-site treatment and disposal. In Proceedings of the Fourth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems. American Society of Agriculutral Engineers, St. Joseph MI. 8. Tyler, E. J., and J.C. Converse. 1994. Soil Acceptance on Onsite Wastewater as Affected Soil Morphology and Wastewater Quality. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems. American Society of Agriculutral Engineers, St. Joseph MI. 9. Wisconsin Department of Commerce Division of Safety and Buildings. 1998. Mound component manual for private onsite wastewater treatment systems (draft). Wisconsin Department of Commerce Division of Safety and Buildings, Madison, WI. SITE RESEARCH 12050 196th st N, Scandia, MN Acres 0.24 ZIP4 NULL Square Footage 10518 State MN Parcel ID 2903220140009 Plat Name NULL Owner Name DAVIES ROBERT J & DEBRA K Block NULL Owner More NULL Lot NULL Owner Address PO BOX 384 Multi Uses N PO Box Homestead N City, State, Zip FOREST LAKE MN 55025 Dwell Type Single-Family / Owner Occupied Estimated Land Value $165,400 Home Style 1 Story Frame Estimated Building Value $30,600 Finished SqFt 400 Estimated Total Value $196,000 Garage Sale Date 5/11/2001 Garage SqFt Sale Value $93,900 Basement Y School District ISD831 Heating FA Gas Watershed District WS CARNELIAN MARINE ST CROIX Cooling N Class Code 1 125 SRR Year Built 1960 Class Code 2 Number of Units 1 Class Code 3 Green Acre N Class Code 4 Open Space N Building Number 12050 Ag Preserve N City CITY OF SCANDIA SITUS_ADDRESS 12050 196TH ST N, CITY OF SCANDIA City USPS SCANDIA TAXDESCRIPTION THAT PART OF GOVERNMENT LOT 3, SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE 20, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 9, BLOCK 2, OF THE RECORDED PLAT OF BECKSTROM ADDITION; THENCE SOUTH 36 DEGREES 17 MINUTES WEST ASSUMING THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF SAID LOT ZIP 55073 TAXPIN 29.032.20.14.0009 Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search,appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. Map Scale 1 inch = 42 feet 9/14/2020 12050 196th st N, Scandia, MN September 14, 2020 0 40 8020 ft 0 10 205 m 1:500 Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search,appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. 6 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map 500879050088005008810500882050088305008840500885050088605008870500879050088005008810500882050088305008840500885050088605008870510950 510960 510970 510980 510990 511000 510950 510960 510970 510980 510990 511000 45° 13' 59'' N 92° 51' 38'' W45° 13' 59'' N92° 51' 35'' W45° 13' 57'' N 92° 51' 38'' W45° 13' 57'' N 92° 51' 35'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 15N WGS84 0 15 30 60 90 Feet 0 5 10 20 30 Meters Map Scale: 1:400 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Washington County, Minnesota 159B—Anoka loamy fine sand, 3 to 9 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 1t943 Elevation: 670 to 1,450 feet Mean annual precipitation: 27 to 33 inches Mean annual air temperature: 39 to 46 degrees F Frost-free period: 135 to 180 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Anoka and similar soils:90 percent Minor components:10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Anoka Setting Landform:Outwash plains Landform position (two-dimensional):Backslope Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Outwash Typical profile Ap - 0 to 9 inches: loamy fine sand E/Bt - 9 to 60 inches: loamy fine sand Properties and qualities Slope:3 to 9 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr) Depth to water table:More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Available water capacity:Moderate (about 8.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: A Forage suitability group: Sloping Upland, Acid (G090XN006MN) Other vegetative classification: Sloping Upland, Acid (G090XN006MN) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Soderville Percent of map unit:5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Custom Soil Resource Report 10 Lino Percent of map unit:5 percent Hydric soil rating: No 1033—Udifluvents Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 1t96x Elevation: 670 to 1,050 feet Mean annual precipitation: 27 to 33 inches Mean annual air temperature: 39 to 46 degrees F Frost-free period: 135 to 180 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Udifluvents and similar soils:90 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Udifluvents Setting Landform:Shorelines Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Sandy beach sediments Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 6 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Somewhat poorly drained Depth to water table:More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w Forage suitability group: Sloping Upland, Low AWC, Acid (G090XN008MN) Other vegetative classification: Sloping Upland, Low AWC, Acid (G090XN008MN) Hydric soil rating: No W—Water Map Unit Composition Water:100 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Custom Soil Resource Report 11 Septic Tank Absorption Fields (MN)–Washington County, Minnesota Map symbol and soil name Pct. of map unit Septic Tank Absorption Fields - At-Grade Septic Tank Absorption Fields - Mound Septic Tank Absorption Fields - Trench Rating class and limiting features Value Rating class and limiting features Value Rating class and limiting features Value 159B—Anoka loamy fine sand, 3 to 9 percent slopes Anoka 90 Not limited Moderately limited Moderately limited Slope 0.26 Fine Sands 0.21 1033—Udifluvents Udifluvents 90 Not rated Not rated Not rated W—Water Water 100 Not rated Not rated Not rated Custom Soil Resource Report 15 12050 196th St N, Marine On Saint Croix, Minnesota, 55047 UTM: 511378 (x), 5008851 (y) Latitude/Longitude: 45.23306 / -92.85504 Township: 32 North, Range: 20 West, Section: 29, City/Township: Scandia MN Department of Health | Minnesota Department of Health, Environmental Health Divisio… + – 0 0.5 1mi Layer Name Layer Label Legend Wells Selected Wells Public Wells Domestic Wells Irrigation Wells Monitor Wells Other Wells Sealed Wells Unverified Wells Township Range Section DWSMA SWBCA Zoom to see wells, TRS, DWSMA and SWBCA DWSMA: The area managed by a public water supplier to protect their source water SWBCA: Special Well and Boring Construction Area layer ⇗ Minnesota Department of Health Minnesota Well Index Search by Zoom to Tools Base Maps Other Links Help 12050 196th St N, Marine On Saint Croix, MN  Version 2.0.62, 07/15/19 1:39PM UTM: 510957 (x), 5008750 (y) Latitude/Longitude: 45.23216 / -92.86041 Township: 32 North, Range: 20 West, Section: 29, City/Township: Scandia MN Department of Health | Minnesota Geological Survey, University of Minnesota and the … + – 0 150 300ft Layer Name Layer Label Legend Wells Selected Wells Public Wells Domestic Wells Irrigation Wells Monitor Wells Other Wells Sealed Wells Unverified Wells Township Range Section DWSMA SWBCA Zoom to see wells, TRS, DWSMA and SWBCA DWSMA: The area managed by a public water supplier to protect their source water SWBCA: Special Well and Boring Construction Area layer ⇗ Minnesota Department of Health Minnesota Well Index Search by Zoom to Tools Base Maps Other Links Help 12050 196th St N, Marine On Saint Croix, MN  Version 2.0.62, 07/15/19 1:39PM Well List selected Highlighted are Field Verified Wells. Click Unique Well ID to see detailed well infomation Unique Number Well Name Address City County Township Range Section Depth(ft)Elevation(ft)Casing Depth(ft)Casing Diameter 107146 RUSSELL, LLOYD 12070 196TH ST MARINE ON ST CROIX Washington 32 20 29 170 948 147 4 12050 196th St N, Marine On Saint Croix, Minnesota, 55047 UTM: 511150 (x), 5008791 (y) Latitude/Longitude: 45.23253 / -92.85795 Click map to get township, range and section MN Department of Health | Minnesota Geological Survey, University of Minnesota and the … + – 0 150 300ft Layer Name Layer Label Legend Wells Selected Wells Public Wells Domestic Wells Irrigation Wells Monitor Wells Other Wells Sealed Wells Unverified Wells Township Range Section DWSMA SWBCA Zoom to see wells, TRS, DWSMA and SWBC DWSMA: The area managed by a public wat supplier to protect their source water SWBCA: Special Well and Boring Constructi Area layer Minnesota Department of Health Minnesota Well Index Search by Zoom to Tools Base Maps Other Links Help 12050 196th St N, Marine On Saint Croix, MN  Version 2.0.62, 07/15/19 1:39PM