Loading...
7.c PC Resolution No. 2021-11_Melcher Variance CITY OF SCANDIA, MINNESOTA PC RESOLUTION NO. 2021-11 APPROVING VARIANCE FOR PARCEL 33.032.20.44.0004 LOCATED AT 12620 181ST STREET NORTH WHEREAS, Forrest and Natalie Melcher have made an application for a variance to construct a detached garage closer to the right-of-way than the house, and to construct an accessory structure exceeding the requirements permitted for parcels between 1 and 3 acres in size, on property identified as PID 33.032.20.44.0004; and WHEREAS, the property is legally described as follows: HARDWOOD HILLS Lot 1 Block 1 Subdivision Cd 91280 SUBJECT TO EASEMENT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request for the Variances at a duly noticed Public Hearing on May 4, 2021, and reviewed again on June 1, 2021, and recommended that the City Council approve the variances with conditions; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SCANDIA, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does recommend that the City Council approve a variance to construct a detached garage closer to the right-of-way than the house, and to construct an accessory structure exceeding the requirements permitted for parcels between 1 and 3 acres in size at 12620 181st Street North, based on the following findings: 1. The Comprehensive Plan does identify the area as having ‘outstanding ecological quality’; the proposed location would be less intrusive than other conforming spots on this property. The request is in general harmony with the Comprehensive Plan and Development Code. 2. The current use of the property is single-family residential, which would not change if this variance request is approved. Proposing to continue to use the property for residential use is a reasonable use. 3. The practical difficulties limiting the locations to build the proposed structure are due to the current house being nonconforming, as well as the location of the existing septic system. Based off the current code requirements, this proposed structure would normally need to be to the side or rear of the house. Based off the location of the existing house and septic, this is difficult to do without a variance of some kind. The practical difficulties of the lot being non-conforming are not caused by the current landowner and are unique to the property. PC Resolution No.: 2021-11 Page 2 of 3 4. The use and function of the property would remain residential, as is the use of other nearby lots in the area. The roadway terminates near where the structure would be built. The addition of a new structure may stand out, as not many buildings are within clear view of the right-of-way, though given its use and the area’s limited traffic, it should not negatively alter the character of the neighborhood. Granting the variance would not alter the essential character of the area. 5. The practical difficulties limiting the locations to build the proposed structure are due to the current house being nonconforming, as well as the location of the existing septic system. The practical difficulties are not only economic in nature. 6. Granting the requested variances would not result in limiting light or air to neighboring properties. The land use will still be single-family residential, so increases to congestion, fire danger, or public safety are not expected. The property values of neighboring values should not be negatively impacted, either, if the requested variances are granted. The requested variances will not impair the supply of light or air to adjacent properties, increase congestion, endanger the public, or substantially diminish or impair property values in the neighborhood. 7. Many of the locations that would be to the rear and side of the existing principal structure are either also within setback areas, or are already occupied. A conforming detached accessory structure could be built in the northwest corner of the lot, though it is not an ideal location due to slopes and needing to clear the area of trees. Given the location of the house, adding onto the house to provide additional storage space would be limited to only the front. The proposed size would exceed what is normally permitted, though the additions would still leave the lot well below the impervious surface coverage limit. The requested variance appears to be the minimum action required to eliminate the practical difficulty, though conditions can be added to ensure the request is the minimum action required. 8. The variance is not related to a need for direct sunlight for solar energy systems. FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that the following conditions of approval shall be met: 1. The proposed detached accessory structure shall not exceed 2,216 square feet in size. 2. The applicant shall secure applicable permits from the Carnelian Marine St. Croix Watershed District, and comply with their requirements. 3. A grading plan and erosion control plan shall be submitted to the City for review prior to issuance of a building permit, showing any areas of soil disruption, in order to ensure that drainage is not directed to adjacent properties and proper erosion control measures are taken. 4. A driveway access permit shall be acquired from the City. 5. Finished floor elevations for the proposed structure shall be shown on final plans. PC Resolution No.: 2021-11 Page 3 of 3 6. The applicant shall secure any other applicable Federal, State, County, and local permits required for the project. 7. The applicant shall pay all fees and escrows associated with this application. Adopted by the Scandia Planning Commission this 1st day of June, 2021. _________________________________ Travis Loeffler, Chair ATTEST: _________________________________ Ken Cammilleri, City Administrator