ScandiaFinalCompPlanApproved by Scandia City Council
March 17th, 2009
Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Photo Credits Carol Seefeldt copyright 2008 Seefeldt Photography
photos on cover and pages 4 - 6, 127 and 140.
Suzanne Rhees Anne Hurlburt CR Planning MN State Historical Society
Acknowledgements
Mayor
Dennis Seefeldt
City Council
Michael Harnetty
Delores Peterson
Pete Crum
Donnette Yehle
Planning Commission
Chair - Chris Ness
Thomas Krinke
Christine Maefsky
Susan Rodsjo
Peter Schwarz
Anne Hurlburt, City Administrator
Brenda Eklund, Deputy Clerk
Steve Thorp, Building/Code Enforcement Official
Sherri Buss, TKDA, City Planner
Ann Pung-Terwedo, Washington County Senior Planner
Joe Lux, Washington County Senior Transportation Planner
Comprehensive Plan Committee
Chair - Dennis Seefeldt
Michael Harnetty
Dave Hebert
Anne Hurlburt
Thomas Krinke
John Lindell
Christine Maefsky
Jim Malmquist
Michele McNulty
Chris Ness
Kevin Nickelson
Susan Rodsjo
Karen Schik
Peter Schwarz
Michael White
Greg Zauner
Consultant Team Jean Coleman, Project Manager CR Planning, Inc.
Brian Ross CR Planning, Inc.
Suzanne Rhees Cunningham Group
Kristen Larson Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc.
Mike Larson URS Corp.
Mark Ellis CR Planning, Inc.
Dana Petit CR Planning, Inc.
... and the people of Scandia
Document design and layout by Maia Mahowald, CR Planning, Inc.
Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Table of Contents
Introduction......................................................... . 1
Purpose............................................................................................................................... 1
Statutory and Metropolitan Council Requirements..................................................... 1
Process of Developing the Plan..................................................................................... 1
Public Input....................................................................................................................... 2
Using the Comprehensive Plan...................................................................................... 3
What is a Vision Narrative?............................................................................................. 4
The Vision and the Plan.................................................................................................. 4
Scandia’s 2030 Vision Narrative..................................................................................... 5
Incorporation as a City..................................................................................................... 9
Natural Resources............................................................................................................. 10
Surface Water and Groundwater Planning.................................................................... 30
Demographics................................................................................................................... 39
Land Use, Community Character and Public Facilities............................................... 47
Housing.............................................................................................................................. 63
Economic Base and Community Development.......................................................... 71
Parks and Recreation........................................................................................................ 83
Transportation System..................................................................................................... 92
Vision for the City of Scandia................................... 4
History.................................................................. 8
Current Conditions................................................. 10
Future Land Use Areas.......................................... 103
Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and Implementation Strategies............119
Table of Contents
Introduction.................................................................................................................. 119
Natural Resources........................................................................................................ 121
Land Use........................................................................................................................ 128
Housing.......................................................................................................................... 138
Energy Use and Systems............................................................................................. 139
Economic Development............................................................................................. 141
Parks and Trails............................................................................................................. 144
Transportation.............................................................................................................. 146
Appendices........................................................... 153
A. Natural Resource Priority Area Mapping........................................................ 153
B. Implementation Schedule.................................................................................. 169
C. Glossary of Terms and List of Acronyms...................................................... 187
D. Future Land Use Areas Summary Matrix....................................................... 193
E. Local Water Management Plan......................................................................... 201
F. Capital Improvement Program 2009 - 2013................................................... 265
G. 2008 Zoning......................................................................................................... 287
H. Inventory of Historic Sites................................................................................ 299
Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Table of Contents
Maps
Map 1 - Lake Classifications, Shoreland, and Floodplain Areas............................ 13
Map 2 - 2006 Water Quality Grade............................................................................. 15
Map 3 - Watershed District Boundaries and Minor Watershed Boundaries........ 16
Map 4 - Sensitivity to Groundwater Pollution - Prairie du Chien and
Jordan Aquifers.............................................................................................. 18
Map 5 - Surficial Geology............................................................................................ 19
Map 6 - Extent of Sand and Gravel Deposits.......................................................... 21
Map 7 - Natural Areas.................................................................................................. 23
Map 8 - High Quality Natural Areas.......................................................................... 25
Map 9 - Regionally Significant Ecological Areas...................................................... 26
Map 10 - National Wetlands Inventory........................................................................ 28
Map 11 - Wetland Assessments..................................................................................... 29
Map 12 - Household Change by TAZ......................................................................... 45
Map 13 - 2007 Land Use by Parcel............................................................................... 48
Map 14 - 2007 Land Use by Parcel, Scandia Village.................................................. 49
Map 15 - Character Districts.......................................................................................... 55
Map 16 - Big Marine Lake Area Wastewater Utilities................................................ 61
Map 17 - Village Area Wastewater and Drinking Water Utilities............................. 62
Map 18 - Regional Economy.......................................................................................... 77
Map 19 - The Regional Parks System Statement Map............................................... 87
Map 20 - Park and Recreation Search Areas............................................................... 89
Map 21 - Existing Traffic Volumes for Scandia.......................................................... 94
Map 22 - Forecasted Traffic Volumes : 2030 Draft for Scandia.............................. 94
Map 23 - Existing Traffic Volumes for Washington County.................................... 95
Map 24 - Forecasted Traffic Volumes for Washington County : 2030 Draft......... 96
Map 25 - Roadway Functional Classification.............................................................. 98
Map 26 - Future Land Use Areas with Natural Resource Overlay.......................... 105
Map 27 - Future Land Use Areas.................................................................................. 106
Map 28 - Prime Agricultural Soils................................................................................. 109
Map 29 - Future Land Use Areas and Parcels with Homes...................................... 115
Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Figures
Figure 1 - Population of Scandia................................................................................... 39
Figure 2 - Age distribution percent change, 1990 - 2000........................................... 43
Figure 3 - Scandia household type................................................................................. 44
Figure 4 - Age of housing stock..................................................................................... 63
Figure 5 - Farm vs. nonfarm housing units in Scandia............................................... 65
Figure 6 - Value of housing stock in 1990 and 2000.................................................. 66
Figure 7 - Bedrooms per housing unit.......................................................................... 67
Figure 8 - Rooms per housing unit................................................................................ 67
Figure 9 - Number of building permits by year........................................................... 68
Figure 10 - Jobs in Scandia 2000 to 2006...................................................................... 71
Figure 11 - Change in number of jobs for selected industries in Scandia............... 72
Figure 12 - Wages paid in Scandia.................................................................................. 72
Figure 13 - Income........................................................................................................... 75
Figure 14 - Community economy................................................................................... 78
Figure 15 - Scandia business inventory.......................................................................... 79
Figure 16 - Employment in goods-producing and service providing sectors......... 80
Figure 17 - Parks, trails, open space, and recreation recommendations................... 84
Map 30 - Planned Connections for Discontinuous Streets...................................... 147
Map 31 - Planned Village Transportation Improvements......................................... 150
Map 32 - Natural Resource Priorities : Composite.................................................... 160
Map 33 - Natural Resource Priorities : Rivers and Streams...................................... 161
Map 34 - Natural Resource Priorities : Lakes.............................................................. 162
Map 35 - Natural Resource Priorities : Wetlands....................................................... 163
Map 36 - Natural Resource Priorities : Groundwater................................................ 164
Map 37 - Natural Resource Priorities : Ecology / High Quality Areas.................. 165
Map 38 - Natural Resource Priorities : Corridors and Connections....................... 166
Map 39 - Natural Resource Priorities : Steep Slopes.................................................. 167
Map 40 - Natural Resource Priorities : Soils................................................................ 168
Table of Contents
Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Table of ContentsTables
Table 1 - Public waters within the City of Scandia.................................................... 11
Table 2 - Watershed Districts in the City of Scandia.................................................14
Table 3 - Acreage of known sand and gravel deposits.............................................. 20
Table 4 - Acreage of natural areas................................................................................ 22
Table 5 - Sites of Biodiversity Significance................................................................. 24
Table 6 - Regionally Significant Ecological Areas...................................................... 27
Table 7 - Comparison of relevant surface water goals, objectives, and
policies from CMSCWD, CLFLWD, and RCWD local water
management plans..................................................................................... .... 33
Table 8 - Comparison of relevant groundwater goals, objectives, and policies
from groundwater plans and studies........................................................... 37
Table 9 - Householders in Washington County.......................................................... 40
Table 10 - Householders in Scandia.............................................................................. 40
Table 11 - Population growth in Scandia and surrounding communities................ 41
Table 12 - Scandia population age................................................................................. 42
Table 13 - Median age...................................................................................................... 42
Table 14 - Scandia household size and number........................................................... 43
Table 15 - Race.................................................................................................................. 46
Table 16 - Ethnicity.......................................................................................................... 46
Table 17 - Education........................................................................................................ 46
Table 18 - Current land use, 2007.................................................................................. 51
Table 19 - Land use acreage and percentages, 1996 and 2007.................................. 51
Table 20 - Elements to consider in assessing historic rural landscapes -
examples.......................................................................................................... 54
Table 21 - Renter vs. owner occupied housing units.................................................. 64
Table 22 - Number of housing units in structure....................................................... 64
Table 23 - Median home values...................................................................................... 66
Table 24 - Types of workers............................................................................................74
Table 25 - Recommended recreational facilities.......................................................... 85
Table 26 - Scandia growth forecasts.............................................................................. 92
Table 27 - Acres and number of parcels by future land use category...................... 116
Table 28 - Theoretical buildout...................................................................................... 118
Table 29 - Average density for residential development areas................................... 118
1Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Purpose
Introduction
After careful consideration, the citizens of Scandia have embraced the vision, principles, pol-
icies, and recommended strategies set forth in this document as the Comprehensive Plan for
the City of Scandia. The Comprehensive Plan will serve as a blueprint for the city, describ-
ing how natural resources will be protected, where and how development will take place, and
how Scandia will continue to maintain its rural character and provide a high quality of life to
all its residents. The Plan was developed with substantial participation from the citizens of
Scandia and is responsive to their unique concerns and goals for the future of their commu-
nity. The previous Comprehensive Plan for New Scandia Township was adopted in 1998.
Statutory and Metropolitan Council Requirements
The Metropolitan Council adopted 2030 A Regional Development Framework, a long-range plan
for regional infrastructure in January 2004. Following the adoption of this document, the
Council issued system statements to all communities within the Metropolitan Area. The
system statements describe goals for the regional systems, such as transportation networks,
wastewater services, parks and open spaces within each community; the council’s goal was
to help communities understand how they fit into regional plans as they update their com-
prehensive plans. According to the Metropolitan Land Planning Act, local governments
within the Metropolitan Area must update their comprehensive plan within three years after
receiving a system statement from the Metropolitan Council. This plan has been developed
in accord with the system statement issued to Scandia in November 2005.
Overall, the densities planned for the future land use areas described in this plan meet the
Metropolitan Council’s guidance for Scandia as a “diversified rural” planning area. Diversi-
fied rural areas allow densities averaging 1 housing unit per 10 acres. This average density
can be achieved with a mix of low-density agricultural areas, large-lot rural residential devel-
opment, clustered housing, and other rural uses.
A Comprehensive Plan Committee (CPC) was created in April 2007 to lead the planning
process. The CPC was chaired by Mayor Dennis Seefeldt and included members of the City
Council, the Planning Commission, the Parks and Recreation Committee, and citizen repre-
sentatives. The responsibilities of the CPC included providing guidance to city staff and the
consultant team during the development of the plan, reviewing a final draft of the plan, and,
ultimately, recommending a plan to the City Council for adoption. In addition, CPC mem-
bers were asked to participate in public involvement activities and to keep their neighbors
and constituents informed about the planning process.
The CPC met twice monthly throughout the year-long planning process to guide the con-
struction of final plan language and the future land use map. The CPC considered back-
ground materials compiled by the consultant team as well as extensive public input provided
through public meetings, focus groups and public surveys.
Process of Developing the Plan
The Comprehensive Plan Committee
2 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Introduction
The planning process included three rounds of public meetings, one near the beginning of
the process, one mid-process, and one near the end. Each round consisted of two meet-
ings held on different days of the week to ensure multiple opportunities for participation.
At each meeting the consultants gave a short presentation, and then the audience was asked
to participate in small group discussions designed to solicit input from a diverse group of
individuals.
1) The first round of meetings was held in October 2007, near the beginning of the pro-
cess. The purpose of these meetings was to present preliminary background informa-
tion and gather input on the community’s vision for development and natural resources.
2) The second round of meetings was held in April 2008, in order to present future land
use alternatives and solicit comments from the public prior to developing a draft plan.
3) The final round presented the final draft plan for comment prior to the formal public
hearing process.
Five focus group meetings were held to gather input from residents of Scandia’s distinct
geographic sub-areas and social groups. One focus group was held for residents of each of
the following areas: the St. Croix River corridor, the village, the lakes, and the rural residen-
tial areas. A focus group was also held for agricultural producers. Attendees were invited to
discuss the unique character of their area and their priorities for its future. Their discussions
helped the CPC create a Comprehensive Plan that is responsive to the needs of each area
and group.
Residents of Scandia were invited to respond to an online survey. Respondents were asked
to complete the sentence “In 2030, I believe Scandia should . . .” They were also asked to
select their top three picks from a list of factors defining “rural character,” and to describe
how development should occur in an area that maintains its rural character. A series of de-
mographic questions (gender, age, length of residency, etc.) rounded out the survey.
Public Input
Public Meetings
Focus Groups
Public Survey
2007
AprilCo mprehensive Plan Committee (CPC) FormedCPC MeetingJuly October December 2008 March MayCPC MeetingCPC MeetingCPC MeetingCPC MeetingCPC MeetingCPC MeetingCPC MeetingCPC MeetingConsultant SelectedCPC MeetingReview Current ConditionsOct. 20th and 23rdVisioning Public MeetingsReview Natural Resource PrioritiesReview Future Land Use Areas and MapsApril 8th and 10th Public MeetingsReview Draft Public Hearing on Final Comprehensive PlanCPC MeetingCPC MeetingReview Scandia Vision Narrative5 Small Focus GroupsOctoberComprehensive Plan
3Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Introduction
Using the Comprehensive Plan
In February 20008 interviews were conducted with 26 existing Scandia businesses. The sur-
vey asked seven questions focusing on perceptions of the current businesses environment
and expectations for the future. Business owners held in common a perspective that doing
business in Scandia was a positive endeavor; the small town feel of the community and the
friendliness of our people contributed greatly to a good business environment. When asked
about the preferred pattern of commercial expansion, about half answered that retail and
services should be clustered around the downtown area of the village and half that thought
retail and services should extend out of the village area, along Highway 97. Only 3 respon-
dents answered that business growth should be distributed across Scandia in a number of
areas. For future development outlook for businesses, several respondents emphasized that
the city needs to build in the village center first, and to plan and work toward a more cohe-
sive appearance and character for the village center locations.
The Comprehensive Plan consists of a number of inter-related sections. These sections are:
• Vision for the City of Scandia. This section describes Scandia’s overarching vision for its
future.
• Current conditions. The current conditions reports present the historic trends and current
conditions of Scandia’s demographics, natural resources, land use, economic situation,
and the condition of public infrastructure systems such as transportation.
• Future Land Use Areas and Map. The Future Land Use Areas and Map section illustrates
the 20-year vision for preferred land uses across the city.
• Goals, Polices, and Implementation Strategies. The Goals and Policies established in this sec-
tion will guide the interpretation of the Vision for the City of Scandia and the Future
Land Use Map. This section also identifies implementation strategies and actions that
the City should take to realize its vision and goals.
Each section of the Plan needs to be taken in perspective with the other sections. Recogniz-
ing this is critical to correctly understand and use the Comprehensive Plan. For example, the
Future Land Use Map cannot be correctly understood or applied without also referencing
the Vision, Goals and Policies, or Implementation Strategies sections.
Business Survey
2007
AprilComprehensive Plan Committee (CPC) FormedCPC MeetingJulyOctoberDecember 2008 March MayCPC MeetingCPC MeetingCPC MeetingCPC MeetingCPC MeetingCPC MeetingCPC MeetingCPC MeetingConsultant SelectedCPC MeetingReview Current ConditionsOct. 20th and 23rdVisioning Public MeetingsReview Natural Resource PrioritiesReview Future Land Use Areas and MapsApril 8th and 10th Public MeetingsReview Draft Public Hearing on Final Comprehensive PlanCPC MeetingCPC MeetingReview Scandia Vision Narrative5 Small Focus GroupsOctoberComprehensive Plan
4 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Vision for the City of Scandia
Scandia’s Comprehensive Plan identifies what development and preserva-
tion priorities need to be met as the City faces the challenges of the 21st
century. The first step in the planning process is identifying long-range
goals 20 – 25 years so that near-term decisions can be made to move the
City step-by-step toward the vision of a better Scandia. The long-range
goals are described in the vision narrative. The vision portrays Scandia’s
desired future in a way that guides the details of the rest of the Plan.
The City of Scandia has created a vision narrative to describe the desired
future. The narrative is written in the present tense but is referring to how
a person would describe the City in the year 2030, assuming the Com-
prehensive Plan has been successfully implemented. The vision narrative
strives to provide enough details to guide decisions both during and after
the Comprehensive Plan process, but not so much detail as to make the
vision rigid or render it irrelevant due to unforeseen changes. The vision
must be both general enough to provide flexibility, and specific enough to
provide direction.
The primary purpose of the vision is to guide the direction that the com-
munity is moving rather than how far the community is capable of mov-
ing. As a result, the vision narrative may seem to be overly optimistic. But
progress toward a goal is the first step to reaching the goal, and the vision
sets an endpoint that allows progress to be measured.
The vision narrative identifies the priorities for both the Comprehensive
Plan process and Comprehensive Plan implementation. During the Com-
prehensive Plan process, the vision served as a signpost, reminding us of
the direction we should be going. The Comprehensive Plan Committee was
faced with difficult decisions during the process and referred back to the vi-
sion to ensure that the discussion was not drifting away from the commonly
held goals of Scandia stakeholders.
The vision narrative will continue to serve as a beacon to ensure that the
Plan is implemented in a manner that moves Scandia toward the desired end
result. The vision is considered in conjunction with the Plan’s written goals
and objectives, with the future land use map and other mapped priorities,
and with the Plan’s recommended strategies for action. The vision does not
stand alone, but helps define the day-to-day implementation efforts along
with the other elements of the Comprehensive Plan.
What is a Vision Narrative?
The Vision and the Plan
5Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Scandia’s 2030 Vision Narrative
Vision for the City of Scandia
Cultural/Historic
Land Use
(Note: The vision is in the present tense because it is written from the per-
spective of someone in the future seeing Scandia in the year 2030 when the
desired changes have already been accomplished.)
Scandia of 2030 has successfully managed the change that has been a
constant in the surrounding region to maintain its unique rural character,
agricultural heritage, historic charm, and natural resources. Scandia remains
unique because of its vibrant village center surrounded by natural resource
corridors intersecting thriving agricultural areas interspersed with rural
residential and lakeshore neighborhoods. Growth management emphasizes
the protection of a rural agricultural feel without pulling up the drawbridge
to change. The City has a reputation for being a welcoming, open, accept-
ing place filled with new opportunities that build on and protect Scandia’s
many assets.
Scandia is known throughout the area as a rural small town with a unique
character and history. The village remains the center of social community
activities. Gammelgarden attracts people to learn about Minnesota history
and enjoy a slice of Swedish culture. Rural buildings endowed with Scan-
dia’s history and identity are preserved or incorporated into development
and redevelopment, and family farms can still be found within the City.
Structures in the village (store, old bank, other store fronts) are recognizable
from old photos and other areas with distinct community or historic charac-
ter such as Big Marine, Copas, and Otisville retain their uniqueness. Scandia
has a thriving arts community that is a visible part of and contributor to the
City’s economic center. Art and recreational tourism provide a synergy that
brings a variety of visitors to the City. Community events continue to cre-
ate culturally diverse community identity, including Scandia’s historic Swed-
ish culture and other newer cultural identities reflecting the City’s increasing
variety of incomes, cultures, ages, household types, and ethnicities.
Scandia has diverse land uses that emphasize its rural nature and natural
landscape, including commercial agriculture, hobby farms, large lot and
clustered rural residential housing, wooded areas, scenic areas and open
spaces, recreational areas, and a compact village area with community-
scale commercial and industrial uses. Agricultural uses include traditional
commodity production, smaller farms devoted to local markets, and hobby
farms. Commercial, healthcare, and industrial uses are primarily located in
the village, although some agriculturally-oriented and recreational commer-
cial uses are located near agricultural and recreational amenities. The City
continues to see managed growth in its village lakeshore communities, while
maintaining traditional agriculture-friendly densities elsewhere. The mix of
land uses in different parts of the City changes with the geography, consis-
tent with the distinct community character of different areas.
6 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Vision for the City of Scandia
Scandia is characterized by a network of greenways and open space – public
and privately owned - that protects the highest quality natural areas, clear
air and water, and the City’s quiet, peaceful countryside. Permanent con-
nections between open space areas provides for the functioning of natural
systems and enjoyment by residents and visitors. Public access, physical and
visual, to lakes and the St. Croix River has been improved, with an empha-
sis on non-motorized use. Groundwater and recharge areas are protected.
Natural shoreline has been preserved or restored along and within most wa-
terways, wetlands and fens. Restoration of shoreland and wetland buffers
allows for development and use while protecting and improving water qual-
ity. The community has protected and restored much of its unique natural
area; fish and native wildlife communities are self-sustaining, the wilderness
of the Lower St. Croix River Valley is recognized as a unique regional asset
and national park, and night skies are bright with stars rather than artificial
light. Existing gravel mines are fully restored after mines are closed. De-
velopment in all areas protects and enhances the City’s green infrastructure
– trails, green corridors, natural systems, surface and groundwater systems,
scenic vistas, and night skies.
Scandia’s parks, trails, open space and recreation system preserves rural
character, protects natural beauty, offers opportunities for healthy lifestyles,
and recognizes the City’s history. An extensive and continuous network of
parks, trails, boulevards, greenways, and scenic byways extends from the
community center and connects all parts of the City, also linking to regional
parks, trails, and greenways. The park and trail system supports a diverse
set of activities and meets the needs of all age and ability levels of residents
and visitors alike, providing a variety of amenities from ballfields to bird
sanctuaries to horse trails. A strong stewardship ethic for lakes, streams,
wetlands, woodlands, prairies and agricultural lands supports a healthy
ecology and a diversity of habitat and recreation opportunities, building
Scandia’s tourism base. New development adds to the City’s protected
open space, non-motorized trail system, and visual access to wilderness and
protected pristine natural areas.
Scandia’s economic base continues to grow, providing services, goods, and
economic opportunities that meet both residents’ and visitors’ needs. The
village is the economic center of the City, including the City’s primary retail,
service, and healthcare businesses and its small but thriving manufactur-
ing and business service base. Tourism and recreation businesses have
expanded both in the village and near Scandia’s natural resource areas, trail
system, and unique agricultural areas. Scandia’s high-speed telecommunica-
tions infrastructure has also helped create new economic activity; most of
Scandia’s businesses are entrepreneurial, reflecting the high percentage of
Parks and Trails
Economy
Natural Resources
7Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Housing
Transportation
Vision for the City of Scandia
residents who are self-employed or work from home. Agriculture continues
to diversify the City’s economic base, including both traditional commodi-
ties and a number of small agricultural operations serving exclusively local
markets. Niche commercial and service businesses target specific growing
markets, such as the growing senior population.
Scandia has “lifecycle” housing opportunities that accommodate a variety
of household types and incomes, including rental and owner-occupied,
affordable and high end, small and large units. New housing development
has proceeded in a way to connect, rather than isolate, new and existing
neighborhoods. Housing design meets sustainable design goals to reduce
the ecological footprint, and architectural designs add long-term value
to neighborhoods. Housing is most dense in the village, but is spread
throughout the City consistent with the land use and community character
priorities.
Scandia’s road system retains the ambiance of the countryside, with mini-
mal traffic signals outside of the village area and reflecting the rolling to-
pography. The scenic qualities of Highways 97 and 95 remain undisturbed
in spite of higher traffic volume. The City has not constructed bypasses,
but instead has roads that connect sites within Scandia and connect Scandia
with major arterial roads. The village center has created an internal street
network that allows ease of movement through the village for autos, bikes,
and pedestrians. Bike routes are generally separated from automobile traffic
and are networked to allow bikes to serve residents as meaningful trans-
portation options, in addition to recreational value. Public transit, such as
commuter buses to the central cities, is available in surrounding communi-
ties but does not directly serve Scandia.
Centralized water and wastewater services have not been extended to
Scandia. Scandia has a high-speed telecommunications infrastructure avail-
able for both residential and commercial use. Scandia has a new City Hall,
community center, and library facilities in the village. Public buildings are
designed to reflect Scandia’s history and the building character of the vil-
lage, and incorporate low-impact and green design features that provide an
example of responsible development to the rest of the community. Renew-
able energy systems are integrated into Scandia’s rural landscapes, housing,
and village businesses. Scandia’s thriving educational system offers learning
opportunities to all ages. Public and educational buildings provide flexible
space for traditional and non-traditional learning opportunities, including
education, art, recreation, and theater. Quality healthcare is available lo-
cally. Public services and regulatory administration are efficiently provided
through partnerships between the City, the School District, the County,
surrounding communities, and state agencies.
Public Services and Infrastructure
8 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
The City of Scandia is the site of the first Swedish settlement in Minnesota. In October,
1850, three young men from Vastergotland, Sweden - Carl Fernstrom, August Sandahl, and
Oscar Roos - settled on the shores of Hay Lake in what is now the City of Scandia. They
built a substantial log cabin and stayed over that winter. These men were not farmers. They
wanted to seek adventure so in 1851 they sold their homestead to Daniel Nilson and set out
on other journeys. Sandahl returned to Sweden, Fernstrom traveled to California in search
of gold, and Roos settled in Taylors Falls. Carl Fernstrom’s adventures became the basis
for the character of Robert in Vilhelm Moberg’s books about the Swedish immigrants who
settled in this area. A monument now stands near the site of this first log house.
Many immigrants from Sweden arrived in the early 1850s, among them Nels Johan Johnson,
who was instrumental in the founding of this community. According to Anna Engquist’s
book, Scandia Then and Now, another early settler was Olof Olin who came from the province
of Medelpad. Olin bought land comprising the town of Scandia. It was Olin who donated
land for Elim Church and cemetery in 1860. He also owned the land where the building that
houses the grocery store, veterinary clinic, and cafe now stands. The present City of Scandia
includes a number of communities such as Vasa/Copas, and Otisville, now marked only by
a cluster of homes or the memories of older citizens. For nearly a century, the Scandia area
existed in near isolation from the social and cultural influences of the State of Minnesota.
During the 1930s the Swedish language gradually gave way to the exclusive use of English in
the local church services. Elim Lutheran Church, founded May 19, 1854, was the most sig-
nificant force in the community. Outsiders found it difficult to see where the church ended
and the community began.
The change from strictly rural to semi-rural living was brought about by many factors.
Banking moved out of Scandia with the depression, and school consolidation saw the depar-
ture of the country schoolhouse. Mechanization of farming reduced the need for man-
power and increased the size of farms. Better roads and state highways eliminated the need
for the railroad station in Copas. The roads and the automobile brought Scandia’s citizens to
metro jobs and metro residents to Scandia for country living.
History
Note: This History sec-
tion is based on the his-
tory section of the 1998
New Scandia Township
Comprehensive Plan
with updates.
Girl Scouts at Camp Lakamaga, Big Marine Lake, 1931
From MN Historical Society Photograph Collection
9Scandia Comprehensive Plan
The history of Scandia’s government begins in 1893 when New Scandia Township was or-
ganized from a part of Marine Township. A town board of three supervisors was elected to
direct its affairs. Three members were appointed to the first Planning Commission in 1968.
This was later increased to five members. The town clerk and the treasurer were elective
offices until 1989 when, by a vote of the citizens, these positions became appointive. Local
planning and development was controlled by town ordinances and a part-time building in-
spector until 1972, when Scandia adopted the Washington County zoning code by reference.
All building permits were administered by the county until 1998 when the County required
townships to provide their own building inspections. The County retained final authority
in zoning and subdivision matters after review by the Township Planning Commission and
Board.
The Town of New Scandia has prepared comprehensive land use plans since 1979, when
the first plan was prepared for the area. The most recent plan was adopted on October 20,
1998. As a Township, the plan was required to be consistent with Washington County’s land
use plan, as well as the Systems Plans of the Metropolitan Council.
As a Township, Scandia was vulnerable to annexation by surrounding cities and could not
control land use to the extent desired. New Scandia Township began investigating the con-
cept of incorporating as a city in 2005. A public meeting was held in 2005 to solicit public
input, and the township submitted an application with the State Department of Administra-
tion to begin the incorporation process. The application was approved, and, as of January
1, 2007, New Scandia Township became the City of Scandia. The first meeting of the new
City Council was held on January 2, 2007. This comprehensive land use plan is the first
adopted by the City of Scandia.
Incorporation as a City
History
Scandia Creamery, September 14th, 1894
From MN Historical Society Photograph Collection
10 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Current Conditions
Natural Resources
Introduction
Scandia’s landscape is a mosaic of agricultural lands, residential and commercial develop-
ment, lakes and streams, and areas with remnant natural vegetative cover. As development
continues, plans to manage future growth should be based on a thorough understanding of
the natural resources within the city’s boundaries. The purpose of this background report
is to summarize available information regarding natural resources in the City of Scandia
and discuss the relationship between natural resources and land use planning. The report is
organized into three major topic areas:
• Water Resources
• Geology and Topography
• Natural Areas
This section of the background report describes the following information related to water
resources:
• Public Waters Inventory
• Shoreland Management Lake Classifications
• Floodplain Areas
• Water Quality
• Watershed Boundaries
Public Waters Inventory
Public waters are all waterbasins and watercourses that meet the criteria set forth in Min-
nesota Statutes, Section 103G.005, subd. 15, that are identified on Public Water Inventory
maps and lists authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Section 103G.201. Public waters wetlands
include all type 3, type 4, and type 5 wetlands (as defined in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Circular No. 39, 1971 edition) that are 10 acres or more in size in unincorporated areas or
2.5 acres or more in incorporated areas. Of the many wetlands and water bodies within the
City’s boundaries, 40 of them have been classified as public waters in accordance with the
guidelines of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
Public waters within Scandia range in size from 2 acres to nearly 2,000 acres of water surface
and include several water bodies of regional significance. Table 1 - Public waters within the City
of Scandia, provides information on all public waters and their acreage. The St. Croix River,
a Federally-designated National Scenic Riverway, forms the eastern border of the City. Big
Marine Lake, in the southwestern portion of the city, is the second largest lake in Washing-
ton County. Existing and future development in areas surrounding public waters should be
carefully managed and planned to prevent adverse impact on water resources.
Water Resources
11Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Current Conditions
Table 1 - Public waters within the City of Scandia
Natural Resources
Name
Public Water
Inventory ID
Shoreland Management
Classification Acres
Alice 82-287 P Natural Environment 26.03
Big Marine 82-052 P Recreational Development 1902.59
Bone 82-054 P Recreational Development 218.47
Clear 82-078 W Natural Environment 35.28
Elwell 82-079 W Natural Environment 18.86
Falls Creek (§1.6.7.12)Wild and Scenic -
Fish 82-064 P Natural Environment 64.99
German 82-056 P Natural Environment 151.20
Goose 82-059 P Natural Environment 84.04
Sylvan 82-080 P Recreational Development 108.25
Hay 82-065 P Natural Environment 59.32
Long 82-068 P Natural Environment 46.12
Nielson 82-055 W Natural Environment 49.65
Pitzl Pond 82-282 W Natural Environment 36.19
Rasmussen Pond 82-070 W Natural Environment 18.24
Sand 82-067 P Natural Environment 47.41
Sea 82-053 W Natural Environment 51.67
St. Croix River 82-001 P Wild and Scenic River -
Washington 82-169 W Natural Environment 22.34
White Rock 82-072 P Natural Environment 80.88
Wojtowicz Pond 82-058 W Natural Environment 16.80
Unnamed 82-057 W Natural Environment 27.52
Unnamed 82-060 W Natural Environment 26.26
Unnamed 82-061 W Natural Environment 14.37
Unnamed 82-062 W Natural Environment 17.44
Unnamed 82-066 W Natural Environment 33.75
Unnamed 82-081 W Natural Environment 41.29
Unnamed 82-171 W Natural Environment 14.54
Unnamed 82-172 W Natural Environment 26.95
Unnamed 82-173 W Natural Environment 10.49
Unnamed 82-174 W Natural Environment 26.49
Unnamed 82-210 W Natural Environment 25.12
Unnamed 82-211 W Natural Environment 10.84
Unnamed 82-212 W Natural Environment 17.46
Unnamed 82-213 W Natural Environment 10.88
Unnamed 82-280 W Natural Environment 19.48
Unnamed 82-281 W Natural Environment 7.46
Unnamed 82-283 P Natural Environment 8.46
Unnamed 82-284 P Natural Environment 2.08
Unnamed 82-285 P Natural Environment 14.73
Unnamed 82-286 P Natural Environment 5.17
12 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Shoreland Management
The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) Shoreland Management System
was developed so that appropriate development standards could be applied to the different
types of lakes found in Minnesota. This classification system includes public water basins
(lakes) greater than ten acres in size in incorporated areas that have DNR-approved shore-
land ordinances. Lakes are divided into the following classes:
• Natural Environment Lakes usually have less than 150 total acres, less than 60 acres
per mile of shoreline, and less than three dwellings per mile of shoreline. They may
have some winter kill of fish; may have shallow, swampy shoreline; and are less than 15
feet deep.
• Recreational Development Lakes usually have between 60 and 225 acres of water per
mile of shoreline, between 3 and 25 dwellings per mile of shoreline, and are more than
15 feet deep.
• General Development Lakes usually have more than 225 acres of water per mile of
shoreline and 25 dwellings per mile of shoreline, and are more than 15 feet deep. (Note:
no lakes in Scandia have been given this classification)
Classifications for the lakes within the City of Scandia are shown on Map 1 - Lake Classifica-
tions, Shoreland, and Floodplain Areas, and listed in Table 1 - Public waters within the City of Scandia.
While the lakes in Scandia are one of the reasons that the city is an attractive place to live,
residential development on these lakes can have detrimental effects on water quality and
wildlife habitat. One of the primary concerns is the impact of impervious surfaces on water
quality. In order to protect lakes from the negative impacts of development, the State of
Minnesota requires cities and counties to adopt a shoreland management ordinance that pro-
vides for the orderly development and protection of shorelands. When New Scandia Town-
ship incorporated as the City of Scandia, the city developed and adopted its own Shoreland
Management Ordinance in 2007.
The Shoreland Management Ordinance applies to land located within the following distances
from lakes that have been given a lake shoreland management classification or rivers and
streams that are considered public waters:
• 1,000 feet from the ordinary high water level of a lake, pond, or flowage
• 300 feet from a river or stream, or the landward extent of a floodplain designated by
ordinance on a river or stream, whichever is greater.
Shoreland Areas within Scandia are shown on Map 1 - Lake Classifications, Shoreland, and Flood-
plain Areas.
Floodplain Areas
The floodplains shown on this map were digitized from the Federal Emergency Management
Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map for Washington County. Floodplains were delineated for
the St. Croix River and some of the larger lakes in the City of Scandia including Big Marine
Lake, Long Lake, Fish Lake and Hay Lake. Map 1 - Lake Classifications, Shoreland, and Flood-
plain Areas, shows the extent of the 100-year and 500-year flood plains for water bodies in
the City of Scandia. Scandia adopted an updated floodplain ordinance in early 2008.
Current ConditionsNatural Resources
13Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Current Conditions
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
CMSCWD
CLFLWD
RCWD
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
82-52 P
82-54 P
82-56 P
82-59 P
82-72 P
82-80 P
82-64 P
82-65 P
82-53 W
82-67 P
82-55 W
82-68 P
82-78 W
82-282 W
82-287 P
82-169 W
82-70 W
82-58 W
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr NKeystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr NSaint Croix Tr NM
ayberry Tr N Olinda Tr N1 7 7 t h S t N
City of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Lake Classifications, Shoreland, and Floodplain AreasLake Classifications, Shoreland, and Floodplain Areas
Shoreland
Lake Shoreland Classification
Natural Environment
Recreational Development
FEMA Floodplain
100 yr. Floodplain
500 yr. Floodplain
City Boundary
Section Lines
Open Water
Streams
Watershed Districts
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
Data Sources: MN DNR
Metropolitan Council
May 17, 2008
Map 1 - Lake Classifications, Shoreland, and Floodplain Areas
Natural Resources
14 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Water Quality/Impaired Waters
In 2006, 11 lakes in the City of Scandia were monitored as part of the Metropolitan Coun-
cil’s Citizen-Assisted Monitoring Program (CAMP). Lakes are sampled every two weeks
from mid-April through mid-October. During each sampling event, temperature, dissolved
oxygen, and Secchi depth transparency are measured and recorded. A surface water sample
is also collected and analyzed for total phosphorus, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, and chlorophyll-
a. Total phosphorus is a key measure of lake nutrients, chlorophyll-a is a measure of algae
abundance, and Secchi depth transparency is a measure of water clarity. Map 2 - 2006 Water
Quality Grade, shows the 2006 water quality grades for lakes in the City.
The Metropolitan Council uses the monitoring data to assign each lake a water quality grade
using an A through F grading system. The grading system uses percentile ranges for three
water quality indicators-summertime average values for total phosphorus, chlorophyll-a, and
Secchi depth transparency. An overall grade is calculated as the average grade for the three
individual grades. The overall grade for 2006 is displayed on Map 2 - 2006 Water Quality
Grade. The majority of monitored lakes in the City were given a “C” grade, including Big
Marine Lake, Bone Lake, Goose Lake, Hay Lake, and Long Lake. White Rock Lake, Fish
Lake and Jellum’s Bay on Big Marine Lake were given a “D” grade.
Under the federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C) the MPCA is required to set standards and
assess Minnesota waters for impairments. The standards are set on a wide range of pollut-
ants, including bacteria, nutrients, turbidity and mercury. A water body is listed as impaired
by the MPCA if it fails to meet one or more water quality standards. If a water body is listed
as impaired, a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) must be established for the pollutant. A
TMDL implementation plan will then be designed to reduce the pollutant loading to meet
the TMDL. Scandia will be required to participate in TMDL plans for impaired water bod-
ies within its borders. In Scandia the following water lakes are listed as impaired because of
excessive nutrients; Big Marine, Bone, Fish, Goose, Hay, Long, and Sand. Big Marine Lake is
also listed as impaired because of mercury pollution. The St. Croix River is listed as im-
paired for mercury and polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB).
Watershed Boundaries
The City of Scandia contains portions of three watershed management organizations: the
Carnelian Marine-St Croix Watershed District (CMSCWD), the Comfort Lake-Forest Lake
Watershed District (CLFLWD), and the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). The
northwest corner of the City is part of the CLFLWD and drains to the Sunrise River which
Watershed Name Size (acres)Percent of City
Carnelian Marine-St Croix
Watershed District
17,488 78.0 %
Comfort Lake-Forest Lake
Watershed District
4,443 19.8 %
Rice Creek Watershed
District
495 0.2 %
TOTAL 22,426 100.0 %
Table 2 - Watershed Districts in the City of Scandia
Source: Water and Soil Resources; Metropolitan Council
Current ConditionsNatural Resources
eventually drains to the St. Croix River.
A very small area in the southwest part
of the City drains to the RCWD and
the Mississippi River. The remainder of
the City is within the CMSCWD which
drains to the St. Croix River in two ways:
15Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Current Conditions
Map 2 - 2006 Water Quality Grade
Natural Resources
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
CMSCWD
CLFLWD
RCWD
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNo
l
a
n
A
v
e
NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
2006 Water Quality Grade2006 Water Quality Grade
2006 Water Quality Grade
A
B
C
D
Not Monitored
City Boundary
Section Lines
Watershed Districts
Streams
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
Data Sources: MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council
November 11, 2008
16 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Map 3 - Watershed District Boundaries and Minor Watershed Boundaries
Current ConditionsNatural Resources !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!
!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!
!
!!!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!
!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!
!!!!!
!
!
!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Carnelian Marine St Croix
Watershed District
Comfort Lake
Forest Lake
Watershed District
Rice
Creek
Watershed
District
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
2 0 5 t h S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNo
l
a
n
A
v
e
NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Margo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr
NMayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Watershed District Boundaries and
Minor Watershed Boundaries
Watershed District Boundaries and
Minor Watershed Boundaries
!!!!!!!!Minor Watersheds
Watershed District
City Boundary
Section Lines
Streams
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
Data Sources: MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council
June 7, 2008
Boundaries
17Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Current Conditions
• Land in the central and southern portions of the City, Big Marine Lake, Mud Lake, and
Turtle Lake drain eventually to Little Carnelian Lake; a man-made outlet on the Lake
connects to the St. Croix River.
• Land in the eastern portion of the City drains directly to the St. Croix River.
The boundaries of the watersheds are shown on Map 3 - Watershed District Boundaries and
Minor Watershed Boundaries. Table 2 - Watershed Districts in the City of Scandia, summarizes the
size of each watershed within the City.
Each watershed management organization is required by the State of Minnesota to update
their Watershed Management Plan every 10 years. After a plan is approved by the Board
of Water and Soil Resources, the watershed district requires each city or township within its
boundaries to create and implement their own local water management plan consistent with
the watershed’s plan. Each city or township is then required to adopt, amend, or update its
local controls to meet watershed district standards. Establishing relationships with these
watershed districts prior to the development of their plans will help ensure that Scandia is
involved in the development of any standards or other controls affecting land use and devel-
opment within the city’s boundaries.
This part of the Current Conditions Section describes the following information related to
geology and topography:
• Surficial geology
• Sensitivity to groundwater pollution
Geology & Topography
Natural Resources
• Extent of known sand and gravel deposits
• Topography
Surficial geology
Materials present at the surface of the landscape in the City of Scandia were created by
glacial and post glacial processes. Glacial materials present at the surface were deposited in
two glacial episodes, the Wisconsin and the Des Moines. The Wisconsin Age ended about
25,000 years ago. Late in the Wisconsin Age, the Superior Lobe advanced south from the
Lake Superior region, leaving moraine and outwash deposits in Washington County. The St.
Croix end moraine has relatively high topography that extends northeast-southwest through
the northern part of Washington County.
The Des Moines Lobe glaciation, the final glacial episode in Minnesota, ended about 10,000
years ago. The Grantsburg Sublobe of the Des Moines Lobe moved from southwest to
northeast through the northwest corner of the Washington County, leaving deposits along
the western edge of the City of Scandia. This unusual south to north moving glacier depos-
ited a lateral moraine and outwash deposits. The tills related to the Des Moines Lobe glacia-
tion are more compact, have more clay, and have lower hydraulic conductivity in general than
the Superior Lobe tills. Map 5 - Surficial Geology, shows the surficial geology for the City of
Scandia.
Geologic landforms and processes influence other important natural features including to-
pography, soil characteristics like infiltration rates and nutrient content, sensitivity to ground-
water pollution, and the development of plant communities.
18 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Current ConditionsNatural Resources
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Sensitivity to Groundwater Pollution -
Prairie du Chien and Jordan Aquifers
Sensitivity to Groundwater Pollution -
Prairie du Chien and Jordan Aquifers
GW Pollution Sensitivity
Very High
High
High - Moderate
Moderate
Low - Moderate
Low
Very Low
City Boundary
Section Lines
Open Water
Streams Data Sources: MN DNR;
MN Geological Survey,
Metropolitan Council
May 18, 2008
Map 4 - Sensitivity to Groundwater Pollution - Prairie du Chien and Jordan Aquifers
19Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Current Conditions
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Manning Tr NMel
a
ni
e Tr
NOxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr
NOlinda Tr NMayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Surficial GeologySurficial Geology
Bedrock Near Surface
Floodplain Alluvium (loamy)
Floodplain Alluvium (sandy)
Glacial Till, Sand and Gravel
Ice Contact Deposit
Lacustrine Deposits
Lacustrine Sand and Silt
Lake Sand (Des Moines)
Lower Terraces
Middle Terraces
Mixed Till (Des Moines)
Modern Lakes and Rivers
Organic Deposits
Outwash (Des Moines)
Outwash (Superior)
Till (Superior)
Middle R. Warren terrace
Upper R. Warren terrace Data Sources: MN DNR
Metropolitan Council
May 18, 2008
Map 5 - Surficial Geology
Natural Resources
20 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Sensitivity to groundwater pollution
The 1990 Washington County Geology Atlas identifies areas of sensitivity to groundwater
pollution. Map 4 - Sensitivity to Groundwater Pollution - Prairie Du Chien and Jordan Aquifers,
shows areas that are susceptible to groundwater pollution in Scandia. The areas of highest
sensitivity are located along the St. Croix River and near some lakes in the western portion
of the city. The classifications are derived both from the type of material overlying the aqui-
fer as well as the amount of material. Areas that are more sensitive to pollution may have
less material overlying the aquifer or the materials are fractured or structured in a way that
allows surface water to reach the aquifer more quickly than in other areas. Map 4 - Sensitivity
to Groundwater Pollution - Prairie Du Chien and Jordan Aquifers, shows the sensitivity of wells in
the Prairie Du Chien and Jordan Aquifers to groundwater pollution.
Groundwater provides all of the drinking water for the City of Scandia. Land uses that
have the potential to generate pollutants should be limited to areas where the sensitivity to
groundwater pollution is low.
Extent of known sand and gravel deposits
In 2000, the Metropolitan Council, the Department of Natural Resources and the Minnesota
Geological Survey collaborated on an aggregate resource inventory of the seven-county met-
ropolitan area. The inventory identified and categorized likely areas of dolostone deposits,
and sand and gravel deposits. Areas identified as “dolostone” represent significant potential
deposits of Prairie du Chien dolostone suitable for crushed aggregate with less than 10 feet
of overburden. The sand and gravel deposits are classified into three categories according
to type and quality (based on percent of gravel content), thickness of deposit, amount of
overlying material, relationship to water table, and reliability of the mapping. Map 6 - Extent
of Sand and Gravel Deposits, shows the extent of known sand and gravel deposits and the loca-
tion of dolostone deposits within the City of Scandia. Table 3 - Acreage of known sand and
gravel deposits, summarizes the estimated area of the dolostone deposits and the categories of
sand and gravel deposits found in the City of Scandia.
This part of the Current Conditions Section describes the following information related to
natural resources:
• Original Vegetation
• Natural areas
• High-quality natural areas
Natural Areas
Table 3 - Acreage of known sand and gravel deposits
Deposit Type Size (acres)
Dolostone 62
Sand & Gravel Deposit, good to excellent quality 649
Sand & Gravel Deposit, moderate to good quality 254
Source: Metropolitan Council
Current ConditionsNatural Resources
• Regionally significant natural areas
• National Wetland Inventory
• Wetland Assessment Status
21Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Current Conditions
Map 6 - Extent of Sand and Gravel Deposits
Natural Resources
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Clear Lake
Sylvan Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Margo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr
NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Extent of Sand and Gravel DepositsExtent of Sand and Gravel Deposits
Permitted Gravel Pits
Dolostone
Aggregate Resources
Class 4, 5
Moderate to Excellent
Previous Sand & Gravel Pits
City Boundary
Section Lines
Open Water
Streams
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road Data Sources: MN DNR;
MN Geological Survey,
Metropolitan Council
November 16, 2008
22 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Original Vegetation
Scandia’s original vegetation was the result of glacial processes that created the topographic
landscape features and soil types. For example, along the St. Croix River, rich alluvial soils
and periodic flooding led to the development of floodplain forests. As the landscape was
modified during European settlement, most natural communities on soils suitable for crop
production were cleared for planting. Natural areas on steep slopes, hydric soils, and poor
soils were left alone or used as pasture. As a result, Scandia’s landscape today is a mosaic of
agricultural lands, residential and commercial development, and remaining areas of natural
cover.
Existing Natural Areas
Existing land cover in the City of Scandia was mapped using the Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources’ (MN DNR) Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS).
MLCCS combines the Minnesota Natural Heritage native plant community types with a cul-
tural classification system to distinguish among different types and amounts of land cover,
vegetation and impervious surfaces. Information on the location, type, size, and quality of
remaining natural areas is included in the MLCCS. Approximately 58% of the land cover in
the City of Scandia is classified as some form of natural area. Map 7 - Natural Areas, shows
remaining natural areas within the City and Table 4 - Acreage of natural areas, summarizes the
acreage of each type of natural area within the City.
Additional development within the City of Scandia has the potential to further impact
the patchwork of remaining natural areas by fragmenting habitat and introducing invasive
species.
Quality of Natural Areas
There are two different measures of high-quality natural areas:
• Natural area quality grades included in the MLCCS
• Minnesota County Biological Survey (MCBS) Sites of Biodiversity Significance
Table 4 - Acreage of natural areas
Natural Area Type Size (acres)
Forest 3,720
Woodland 1,720
Shrubland 1
Grassland 1,761
Sparse Vegetation 3
Forested Wetland 879
Shrub Wetland 315
Herbaceous Wetland 1,643
Sparse Wetland Vegetation 14
Open Water 3,051
TOTAL 13,107
Source: City of Scandia MLCCS
Current ConditionsNatural Resources
23Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Current Conditions
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
a
ris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr
NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Natural AreasNatural Areas
Forest
Woodland
Shrubland
Grassland
Sparse Vegetation
Forested Wetland
Shrub Wetland
Herbaceous Wetland
Sparse Wetland Vegetation
Open Water
City Boundary
Section Lines
Streams
Data Sources: MN DNR;
Metropolitan Council
May 18, 2008
Map 7 - Natural Areas
Natural Resources
24 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Natural area quality grades using an A through F grading system are collected as part of the
MLCCS. Natural areas given a grade of A, AB, B, or BC are considered high quality and
are displayed on Map 8 - High-Quality Natural Areas. There are approximately 1,270 acres of
high-quality areas within the City of Scandia using this measure.
MCBS Sites of Biodiversity Significance are also displayed on Map 8 - High-Quality Natural
Areas. This data layer, generated by the MN DNR, represents areas with varying levels of
native biodiversity that may contain high-quality native plant communities, rare plants, rare
animals, and/or animal aggregations. A biodiversity significance rank is assigned on the
basis of the number of rare species, the quality of the native plant communities, size of the
site, and the site’s context within the landscape. The classifications displayed on the map are
described below:
• Below sites lacking occurrences of rare species and/or natural features that meet MCBS
standards for an Outstanding, High, or Moderate rank
• Moderate sites containing significant occurrences of rare species and/or moderately
disturbed native plant communities and landscapes that have a strong potential for
recovery
• High sites containing very good quality occurrences of the rarest species, high-
quality examples of the rarest native plant communities, and/or important functional
landscapes
• Outstanding sites containing the best occurrences of the rarest species the most out-
standing examples of the rarest native plant communities, and/or the largest, most intact
functional landscapes present in the state
Table 5 - Sites of Biodiversity Significance, summarizes the acreage of the four categories of sites
of biodiversity significance found within the City of Scandia.
Regionally Significant Natural Areas
The MN DNR completed an analysis of regionally significant Terrestrial and Wetland Eco-
logical Areas in the seven county metropolitan area in 2004. The analysis assessed remaining
forest, grassland, and wetland areas. The scores were determined by examining important
ecological attributes of the natural areas, including size, shape, cover type diversity, and
adjacent land use. Map 9 - Regionally Significant Ecological Areas, displays Regionally Significant
Ecological Areas, as determined by the MN DNR. Table 6 - Regionally Significant Ecological
Areas, summarizes the acreage for each category of Regionally Significant Ecological Areas
found within the City of Scandia.
Table 5 - Sites of Biodiversity Significance
Natural Area Type Size (acres)
Below 309
Moderate 933
High 332
Outstanding 343
TOTAL 1,917
Source: Minnesota County Biological Survey
Current ConditionsNatural Resources
25Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Current Conditions
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
High Quality Natural AreasHigh Quality Natural Areas
High Quality Natural Areas
Sites of Biodiversity Significance
Outstanding
High
Moderate
Below
City Boundary
Section Lines
Open Water
Streams
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
Data Sources: MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council
May 18, 2008
Map 8 - High Quality Natural Areas
Natural Resources
26 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Current Conditions
Map 9 - Regionally Significant Ecological Areas
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr NOlinda Tr NMayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Regionally Significant Ecological AreasRegionally Significant Ecological Areas
Regionally Significant Ecological Areas
Outstanding Ecological Score
High Ecological Score
Moderate Ecological Score
City Boundary
Section Lines
Open Water
Streams
Roads
State Hwy
County Hwy
City Road
Other Road
Data Sources: MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council
May 18, 2008
Natural Resources
27Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Table 6 - Regionally Significant Ecological Areas
Natural Area Type Size (acres)
Moderate 1,490
High 1,328
Outstanding 1,890
TOTAL 4,708
National Wetland Inventory
The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) is a national program sponsored by the US Fish
and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Based on the NWI data, the City of Scandia has approxi-
mately 5,492 acres of wetland. Map 10 - National Wetlands Inventory, displays wetland area
features mapped as part of the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI).
Wetland Assessment Status
The Carnelian Marine St. Croix Watershed District (CMSCWD) has completed a wetland
assessment for a portion of the watershed. The wetland assessment contains more com-
plete and more acccurate data than the NWI. A wetland assessment categorizes wetlands
by importance, quality, and need for restoration. The CMSCWD plans to complete the
wetland assessment for the remainder of the watershed in 2008. The Comfort Lake-Forest
Lake Watershed District and the Rice Creek Watershed District have not completed wetland
assessments. Map 11 - Wetland Assessments, displays the Wetland Assessments that have been
completed within the City of Scandia.
Source: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Current ConditionsNatural Resources
28 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Current Conditions
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Manning Tr NMe
l
ani
e Tr
NOxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSai
n
t Cr
o
i
x
Tr
NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
National Wetlands InventoryNational Wetlands Inventory
National Wetlands Inventory
Lakes and Rivers
Wetlands
City Boundary
Section Lines
Streams
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
Data Sources: MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council
May 18, 2008
Map 10 - National Wetlands Inventory
Natural Resources
29Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Current Conditions
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
CMSCWD
CLFLWD
RCWD
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNo
l
a
n
A
v
e
NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr NOlinda Tr NMayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Wetland AssessmentsWetland Assessments
CMSCWD Wetland Management Class
1 - High Quality/Highest Priority
2 - Stream Corridor + Shoreland Wetlands
3 - Isolated Wetlands
4 - Utilitzed Wetlands
City Boundary
Section Lines
Streams
Watershed Boundaries
Data Sources: MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council,
CMSCWD
May 18, 2008
Map 11 - Wetland Assessments
Natural Resources
30 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Surface Water and Groundwater Planning
Introduction
The purpose of this section is to:
• Describe the purpose of surface water and groundwater planning
• Identify the agencies and organizations that do surface water and groundwater planning
within the City of Scandia, and
• Summarize the goals and policies of recent plans and studies regarding surface water
and groundwater resources in the City of Scandia.
The purpose of water planning is to protect and maintain or improve the quality of surface
water and groundwater resources. It should be noted that there is a great deal of overlap
in planning for surface water resources and planning for groundwater resources. While the
planning efforts for each are described here separately, in reality, surface water planning ef-
forts usually touch on groundwater issues and groundwater planning efforts often include
issues relating to the interaction between surface water and groundwater.
Within the City of Scandia, surface water planning is done by several entities. Minnesota
Statute 103D enables the creation of watershed districts. Watershed districts are local units
of government that protect surface water resources through the adoption and implementa-
tion of local water management plans. Because watersheds do not follow political boundar-
ies, there are three watershed districts within the City of Scandia: the Carnelian Marine-St.
Croix Watershed District (CMSCWD), the Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District
(CLFLWD), and the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). Map 3 - Watershed Boundar-
iesand Watershed District Boundaries, shows the boundaries of each watershed district within
the City of Scandia (page 16). Every 10 years, each watershed district is required to prepare
plans to:
• Protect, preserve, and use natural surface and groundwater storage and retention
systems
• Minimize public capital expenditures needed to correct flooding and water quality
problems
• Identify and plan for means to effectively protect and improve surface and groundwater
quality
• Establish more uniform local policies and official controls for surface and groundwater
management
• Prevent erosion of soil into surface water systems
• Promote groundwater recharge
• Protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water recreational facilities; and
• Secure the other benefits associated with the proper management of surface and
groundwater.
After plan approval by the Board of Water and Soil Resources, the watershed district for-
mally adopts the plan and requires each city or township within its boundaries to create and
implement its own local water management plan consistent with the watershed district’s plan.
As a result, the City of Scandia is required to develop its own local water management plan
that is consistent with approved watershed district plans. The CMSCWD adopted their most
Current Conditions
31Scandia Comprehensive Plan
recent plan in 2000, the CLFLWD adopted its most recent plan in 2001, and the RCWD
adopted its most recent plan in 1997 and amended in 2000. After developing a local water
management plan, a city or township may then also develop or update local ordinances in
order to implement or enforce portions of its plan.
Groundwater planning is also completed by several entities within the City of Scandia. Min-
nesota Statute 103D allows watershed districts to include groundwater resources in their
local water management plans, while Minnesota Statute 103B provides counties with the
authority to complete groundwater plans. County Groundwater Plans are approved by the
Board of Water and Soil Resources. Washington County’s most recent Groundwater Plan
was completed and approved in 2003. Washington County’s 2003 Plan focuses on protecting
groundwater resources through coordinated intergovernmental efforts. Priority groundwater
issues for Washington County cities like Scandia include proper Individual Sewage Treatment
System installation and maintenance and proper installation, maintenance, and sealing of
residential wells.
The plans, studies, and ordinances summarized in this report include:
• Carnelian Marine-St. Croix Watershed District, Watershed Management Plan, 2000
• Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District, Watershed Management Plan, 2001,
revised 2008
• Rice Creek Watershed District, Watershed Management Plan, 1997 (amended 2000)
• City of Scandia, DRAFT Shoreland Management Regulations, 2007
• Washington County Groundwater Plan, 2003-2013
• Washington County Model Groundwater Rules, 2004
• Integrating Groundwater and Surface Water Management – Northern Washington
County, 2003
This section briefly describes the most recent local water management plan for each of the
three watershed districts within the City of Scandia, followed by a comparison of the goals,
objectives, and policies of each plan. The City of Scandia’s draft Shoreland Management
Regulations are also summarized.
City of Scandia, Shoreland Management Regulations, 2007
When a new city is incorporated, it is required to adopt its own ordinances for which it had
previously relied on the County. To that end, the City of Scandia adopted a new Shoreland
Management Ordinance, as chapter 5 of the City of Scandia’s Development Code. The
purpose of the shoreland management regulations is to:
• Designate suitable land use districts for each body of public water
• Regulate the placement of sanitary and waste treatment facilities on lots
• Regulate the area of a lot and the length of water frontage suitable for building sites
• Regulate the alteration of shorelands on public waters
• Regulate alterations of the natural vegetation and the natural topography along
shorelands
• Conserve natural resources and maintain a high standard of environmental quality
• Preserve and enhance the quality of surface water
• Preserve the economic and natural environmental values of shorelands
Surface Water Planning
Current ConditionsSurface Water and Groundwater Planning
32 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
• Provide for the utilization of water and related land resources
• Maintain water quality, reduce flooding and erosion, and provide food and habitat for
wildlife.
Because the city is currently updating its comprehensive plan and two of the watershed dis-
tricts within the city are updating their rules, this draft ordinance is considered an “interim”
measure. After the comprehensive plan is adopted, the city is expected to complete overall
update to its Development Code.
Carnelian Marine-St. Croix Watershed District, Watershed Management Plan,
2000
The Carnelian Marine-St. Croix Watershed District’s (CMSCWD) most recent watershed
management plan was created in 2000. The plan contains the goals, policies and manage-
ment plans of the CMSCWD and guides the watershed’s activities until 2010. Seventy-eight
percent of the city of Scandia falls within the CMSCWD. Electronic copies of the plan are
available upon request. Please contact John Bower, CMSCWD President:
Email: CarMarWD@aol.com
Phone: (651) 430-2793
The 2000 CMSCWD Watershed Management Plan contains objectives and policies for 12
major issue areas:
• Water Quality
• Lake Management
• Groundwater
• Wetlands
• Streams
• Erosion & Sedimentation Control
• Stormwater Runoff
• Flooding
• Shoreland Management
• Fish & Wildlife
• Parks, Natural Corridors & Open Space
• Aquatic Vegetation Management
Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District, Watershed Management Plan,
2001
The Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District’s (CLFLWD) most recent watershed
management plan was created in 2001 with revisions adopted and approved by BWSR in
August 2008. The plan contains the goals, objectives, and actions of the CLFLWD and
guides the watershed’s activities until 2011. An electronic version of the plan can be found
at: http://www.clflwd.org/docs/watershed_management_plan.pdf
The plan has 7 core goal areas:
• Water Management
• Lakes
• Streams
• Wetlands
• Natural Resources
• Biotic Diversity, and
• Interagency and Public Coordination
Current ConditionsSurface Water and Groundwater Planning
CLFLWD is in the final stages of drafting rules and standards to support a permitting
program for the following activities: stormwater management; erosion control; shoreline and
streambank alterations; watercourse and basin crossings; floodplain and drainage alterations;
and wetland management under the state Wetland Control Act. After adoption of the rules
33Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Rice Creek Watershed District, Watershed Management Plan, 1997 (amended
2000)
The Rice Creek Watershed District’s (RCWD) most recent watershed management plan was
created in 2001. The plan contains the objectives, policies, and management strategies of the
RCWD and guides the watershed’s activities until 2007. Only 0.2% of the city of Scandia
falls within the RCWD. An electronic version of the plan can be found at:
http://www.ricecreek.org/content/documents/planning/Watershed_Management_Plan.pdf
The RCWD’s 1997 Watershed Management Plan has 6 objectives:
• Minimize public expenditure to control runoff
• Improve water quality
• Prevent flooding and erosion
• Promote groundwater recharge
• Protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and recreation
• Provide for the transition of water management to local units
Comparison of Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policies
Table 7 - Comparison of relevant surface water goals, objectives, and policies, summarizes the goals, ob-
jectives, and policies included in the CMSCWD, CLFLWD, and RCWD local water manage-
ment plans. Only those items that have some bearing on activities related to land use were
included in the table.
GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & POLICIES CMSCWD CLFLWD RCWD
General Water Quality
1. District shall exercise review and permitting authority over
all construction activities
2. District will develop rules and implement permit program
3. District shall require local government units to adopt ordi-
nances controlling the access of livestock to public waters
and ditches
4. District will promote the use of BMPs to improve the
quality of water resources
5. District will require that all local water management plans
adopt the water quality goals and design standards in the
plan
6. District will require local units of government to adopt
ordinance that control nuisance waste and debris
Table 7 - Comparison of relevant surface water goals, objectives, and policies from
CMSCWD, CLFLWD, and RCWD local water management plans.
Current ConditionsSurface Water and Groundwater Planning
and standards by CLFLWD, Scandia will be required to update its ordinances to come into
consistency with the new rules and standards. In addition, CLFLWD is in the final stages of
developing a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)plan for Bone lake because it is listed by
the MPCA as impaired for excessive nutrients (phosphorus). Scandia has been participating
in the advisory committee to the TMDL process and will be required to implement load al-
locations resulting from the TMDL.
34 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & POLICIES CMSCWD CLFLWD RCWD
7. District will use performance based permit requirements
to restrict nutrient discharges
8. District will promote sustainable development
9. District will require that new developments implement one
of three water quality BMPs
10. District requires notification of development activities
where hazardous waste is stored or handled
Lake Water Quality
1. District will require that its stormwater discharge nutrient
concentrations be met by new developments
Stream Water Quality
1. District will require 100-foot buffer of native vegetation
surrounding streams on new developments
2. District will require cities to establish a minimum 100-foot
buffer along streams to be acquired as part of land dedica-
tion upon development
3. District will encourage the maintenance of riparian buffers
along waterways
Stormwater Runoff
1. District will require natural infiltration of runoff, where
practical
2. District will require that peak stormwater discharge from a
development shall not exceed the undeveloped, pre-settle-
ment discharge volume and rate
3. District shall establish impervious surface limits on new
development
4. District will establish standards for stormwater runoff
quality and quantity for new developments
5. District will require that runoff rates from develop-
ment sites be controlled in conformance with district
requirements
Flooding
1. District will require LGUs to adopt floodplain ordinances
that meet state requirements
Groundwater
1. District will exercise review and permitting authority over
all developments within 1,000 feet of an identified ground-
water recharge area
2. District will require all developments which result in ½
acre of impervious surfaces to implement groundwater
recharge and infiltration BMPs
Table 7 - Comparison of relevant surface water goals, objectives, and policies from
CMSCWD, CLFLWD, and RCWD local water management plans.
Current ConditionsSurface Water and Groundwater Planning
35Scandia Comprehensive Plan
GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & POLICIES CMSCWD CLFLWD RCWD
3. District will require LGUs to include land use develop-
ment guidelines for natural groundwater recharge through
infiltration of rainfall and for protection of groundwater
quality through the control of land use and development
4. District will work with LGUs to modify land use and
zoning plans to protect groundwater and groundwater
recharge areas
5. District will not allow mining within 3 feet of the highest
indicated groundwater table
6. District will prohibit the construction of impervious
surfaces within floodplain recharge areas except for road
constructions
7. Control developments with the potential to contaminate
development
8. Preserve groundwater recharge areas
Table 7 - Comparison of relevant surface water goals, objectives, and policies from
CMSCWD, CLFLWD, and RCWD local water management plans.
This section of the background report briefly describes the most recent plans and studies
relating to groundwater planning in the City of Scandia, followed by a comparison of the
goals and objectives of each plan or study.
Washington County Groundwater Plan, 2003-2013
The Washington County Groundwater Plan provides a county-wide framework for the pro-
tection and conservation of groundwater resources. The current plan was approved in 2003
and guides the protection of groundwater resources in the county until 2013. An electronic
version of the plan can be found at: http://www.co.washington.mn.us/client_files/docu-
ments/phe/ENV//ENV-2003GroundwaterPlan.pdf
The overall goal of the Washington County Groundwater Plan is to protect the economic
and environmental values groundwater provides through coordinated, intergovernmental
efforts in research and assessment, policies, political influence, regulation, education, and
consultation and technical assistance.
The plan addresses two major issues: groundwater quality and groundwater quantity. The
plan identifies 7 major issue areas relating to groundwater quality and groundwater quantity:
• Non-agricultural land use
• Agriculture, turf, and animal waste management
• Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS)
• Wellhead protection and well management
• Groundwater supply
• Groundwater and surface water interaction
• Hazardous materials management and transportation
Groundwater Planning
Current ConditionsSurface Water and Groundwater Planning
36 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Washington County Model Groundwater Rules, 2004
In 2004, the Washington County Water Consortium developed model groundwater rules for
future adoption by the water management organizations (WMOs) located within the County.
The model rules address groundwater appropriations, stormwater runoff volume control,
groundwater quality, the protection of groundwater dependent natural resources.
The purpose of the model rules is to encourage water management organizations to adopt
groundwater standards. As local units of government develop local water management
plans they will also have to consider the adoption of similar standards in order to be consis-
tent with watershed management plans. The overall goal is for groundwater protection to
become an integral part of future land use decisions at both the watershed district level as
well as the municipal level.
An electronic version of the model rules can be found at: http://www.co.washington.
mn.us/client_files/documents/phe/ENV//ENV-WDReport.pdf
Integrating Groundwater and Surface Water Management, Northern
Washington County, 2003
The purpose of this study by Washington County is to provide local decision-makers with
planning level information on groundwater resources. It provides data to support manage-
ment strategies and policies protecting lakes, wetlands, streams, and water supplies depen-
dent on groundwater resources. The study area for this report includes all areas of Washing-
ton County north of State Highway 36. The study included:
• An educational component aimed at educating and informing local water management
groups
• A hydrologic monitoring plan
• An assessment of groundwater resources; lakes, recharge and discharge areas, and
groundwater-dependent resources were inventoried and classified
• A strategy for integrating groundwater and surface water management, including policies
and recommendations for protecting drinking water, maintaining recharge, and manag-
ing high water levels
• A feasibility study for managing excess surface water; Valley Branch Watershed District
investigated alternatives for retention and infiltration of water in the upper watershed of
the Sunnybrook Lake area.
An electronic version of the study can be found at: http://www.co.washington.mn.us/cli-
ent_files/documents/phe/ENV//ENV-GroundSurfaceWaterMgmt.pdf
The strategy for integrating groundwater and surface water management addresses four is-
sues relating to groundwater:
• Groundwater recharge and discharge areas
• Areas susceptible to high water levels
• Groundwater-surface water interaction and groundwater-dependent resources
• Education
Current ConditionsSurface Water and Groundwater Planning
37Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Table 8 - Comparison of relevant groundwater goals, objectives, and policies, summarizes the goals,
objectives, and policies included in the 2003 Washington County Groundwater Plan, 2003
Groundwater Study and the 2004 Washington County Model Groundwater Rules local water
management plans. Only those items that have some bearing on activities related to land use
were included in the table.
Comparison of Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policies
GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & POLICIES 2003 GMP 2003 GW
STUDY
2004 GW
RULES
Non-Agricultural Land Use
1. Assess the potential impacts to groundwater re-
sources from different land uses
2. Provide cities and townships with types of land uses
that may not be suitable in unsewered areas
3. Establish groundwater protection as a goal when
making land use decisions and as part of the com-
prehensive planning process
4. Enforce groundwater-related provisions in the
County and local mining ordinances
Agriculture, Turf, Animal Waste Management
1. Provide model zoning language and mitigation strat-
egies for areas shown to be impacted by fertilizer,
pesticides, or animal waste
Individual Sewage Treatment Systems
1. Reduce groundwater contamination related to on-
site waste-water treatment systems
2. Revise County ordinance to require property owners
to have a certificate of inspection, to upgrade or
replace non-conforming systems, and identify and
properly close abandoned ISTS before property
transfer
3. Require proper design, building, operation and
maintenance of effective septic systems
Aquifer Protection
1. Require reporting of all abandoned wells to prevent
contamination of groundwater
2. Provide financial incentive for identifying and seal-
ing abandoned wells
3. Maintain existing infiltration volumes whenever any
construction, reconstruction, building activity or
land alteration occurs
4. Restrict prohibited land uses that generate, use or
store dangerous pollutants in critical recharge areas
Table 8 - Comparison of relevant groundwater goals, objectives, and policies from
groundwater plans and studies.
Current ConditionsSurface Water and Groundwater Planning
38 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & POLICIES 2003 GMP 2003 GW
STUDY
2004 GW
RULES
Groundwater Surface Water Interaction
1. Develop land use regulations to protect groundwater
resources based on completed studies and rankings
of groundwater recharge areas
2. For all new developments and re-developments,
adopt rules controlling stormwater runoff volume
and establish performance standards
3. Require all new development and re-development to
offset reduced infiltration that results from increased
imperviousness
Hazardous Materials Management and Transportation
1. Help communities develop groundwater protection
policies related to the siting and permitting of new
commercial and industrial development
2. Assist communities with groundwater monitoring
plan or groundwater protection plan requirements
3. Require a groundwater monitoring plan or a ground-
water protection plan as part of a permit application
for businesses that store, use, or transport hazardous
materials and for properties formerly used as a waste
disposal site or waste transfer facility
Table 8 - Comparison of relevant groundwater goals, objectives, and policies from
groundwater plans and studies.
Current ConditionsSurface Water and Groundwater Planning
39Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Demographics
Historic and Future Population Trends
According to the U.S. Census, the population of Scandia in 2000 was 3,692. This represent-
ed a 15% increase from the 1990 population of 3,197. In 2007, the Metropolitan Council
estimated that Scandia had a population of 4,210, an increase of 14% over the 2000 popula-
tion. According to population projections from the Metropolitan Council, Scandia’s popula-
tion is projected to grow to 5,400 by 2030, a 46% increase over the 2000 population, and a
gain of just over 1.5% per year. This steady growth rate offers opportunities for the City of
Scandia without overwhelming the community.
Figure 1 - Population of Scandia, shows the growth in actual population from 1930 to 2000
and the projected population growth from 2000 to 2030. Through the 1990s, Scandia grew
at approximately the same rate as it had in the 1980s (12% in the 1980s, 15% in the 1990s).
This growth rate represented a deceleration of the growth seen in Scandia between 1960 and
1980. From 1960 to 1980, the township’s population almost tripled, increasing from 950 to
2,858. Many factors contributed to Scandia’s growth between 1960 and 1980, including the
completion of Interstate 35, improvement of county and state highways, inexpensive land,
conversion of seasonal cabins to year-round homes, and an influx of urbanites in search of
a rural lifestyle. Previous to this period of growth, Scandia’s population had been relatively
stable, declining from 941 in 1930 to 899 in 1950 as farm residents moved to more urban
areas.
Figure 1 - Population of Scandia
Population of Scandia, 1930-2030
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030
YearPopulation
Sources: U.S. Census; Metropolitan Council System Statement, 2005
Current Conditions
40 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Tenure
Compared to the rest of Washington County, householders in Scandia have lived in their
homes longer. This was true in 1990 and in 2000 (See Tables 9 & 10 - Householders in Wash-
ington County and Householders in Scandia). In Scandia in 1990, the largest group of household-
ers (47.1%) had lived in their homes between 1 and 10 years. The second largest group of
householders (38.1%) had lived in their homes between 11 and 20 years. This large group of
11-20 year householders were the people that moved into Scandia in the 1970s, causing the
growth in population seen in Figure 1 - Population of Scandia, during that decade.
In 2000, approximately the same percent of homeowners (49.6) had lived in their homes
between 1 and 10 years as had in 1990. However, the percentage of people living in their
homes between 11 and 20 years was smaller than in 1990 (22.0% in 2000; 38.1% in 1990).
This reflects the slowdown in growth in the 1980s as compared to the 1970s as seen in Fig-
ure 1 - Population of Scandia. In 2000, the percentage of people living in Scandia between 21
and 30 years was greater than that in 1990 (23.3% in 2000; 8.0% in 1990). These 21-30 year
homeowners were the same group who moved into Scandia in the 1970s.
Washington County
Years Householder has Lived in Unit
1990 2000
1-10 years 67.2 64.7
11-20 years 17.8 21.1
21-30 years 9.1 8.1
31 or more years 6.0 6.2
Scandia
Years Householder has Lived in Unit
1990 2000
1-10 years 47.1 49.6
11-20 years 38.1 22.0
21-30 years 8.0 23.3
31 or more years 6.8 5.1
Table 9 - Householders in Washington County
Table 10 - Householders in Scandia
Source: U.S. Census 1990 and 2000
Source: U.S. Census 1990 and 2000
Current ConditionsDemographics
41Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Growth of Surrounding Communities
Compared to surrounding communities, Scandia was the fifth largest in terms of popula-
tion in 2000. Stillwater, Forest Lake, Hugo, and Wyoming Township had larger populations.
However, ten surrounding communities had faster growth rates than New Scandia during
the 1990s: Wyoming Township, Hugo, Wyoming City, Taylors Falls, Chisago City, Center
City, Stillwater Township, Lindstrom, Forest Lake, and May Township (See Table 11 - Popula-
tion growth in Scandia and surrounding communities).
Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2006
% Change
2000-2006
Scandia 1,513 2,858 3,197 3,692 4,189 13
Center City 324 458 451 582 618 6
Chisago City 1,068 1,634 2,009 2,622 4,307 64
Forest Lake City 3,207 4,596 5,833 6,798 17,424 156
Forest Lake Township*2,990 5,331 6,690 7,642
Franconia Township 650 1,007 1,151 1,128 1,387 23
Hugo City 2,732 3,771 4,417 6,363 10,361 63
Lindstrom City 1,260 1,972 2,461 3,015 3,966 32
Marine On St. Croix 513 543 602 602 695 15
May Township 1,298 2,076 2,535 2,928 3,251 11
Osceola Township 2,085 2,450 18
Osceola Village 1,152 1,581 2,075 2,421 2,619 8
St. Croix Falls City 1,425 1,497 1,640 2,033 2,135 5
St. Croix Falls Township 1,119 1,193 7
Stillwater City 10,191 12,290 13,882 15,143 17,929 18
Stillwater Township 1,014 1,599 2,066 2,553 2,612 2
Taylors Falls City 587 623 694 951 1,054 11
Wyoming City 695 1,559 2,142 3,048 3,760 23
Wyoming Township*1,262 2,312 2,967 4,379 3,562 -19
Table 11 - Population growth in Scandia and surrounding communities
Sources: U.S. Census data from the Minnesota State Demographer’s Office; Metropolitan Council;
Wisconsin Department of Administration
* Tracking population changes between 1990 and 2006 was complicated by changing municipal boundaries. Portions of
Forest Lake Township have been annexed by other communities. The entirety of Forest Lake Township was annexed by
the City of Forest Lake.
Current ConditionsDemographics
42 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Population Age Trends
Following national trends of aging baby boomers, Table 12 - Scandia population age, shows that
in the 1990s the township’s fastest growing age cohorts were the 55-59 cohort, the 60-64 co-
hort, and the 75-84 cohort. Figure 2 - Age distribution percent change, shows that the number of
persons in some of the younger cohorts in Scandia actually declined between 1990 and 2000,
including the 0-5 cohort, the 5-9 cohort, the 20-24 cohort and the 25-34 cohort. Neither
Washington nor Chisago County showed any decline in the number of people in any age
cohort (Figure 2 - Age distribution percent change). As compared to Washington and Chisago
County, Scandia showed a greater decline in the number of young people. Scandia’s increase
in the number of older people was greater than Chisago County and fairly equivalent to
Washington County (see Figure 2 - Age distribution percent change).
Table 13 - Median age, also confirms the presence of an aging trend in Scandia and surround-
ing communities. Between 1990 and 2000, Scandia’s median age changed from 35.6 to 40.3.
The median age in Chisago County and Washington County also grew during the 1990s, but
Scandia maintained the oldest median age.
Scandia Population Age
1990 2000
Under 5 216 201
5 - 9 283 232
10 - 14 260 313
15 - 19 279 320
20 - 24 145 141
25 - 34 382 274
35 - 44 638 698
45 - 54 481 731
55 - 59 137 257
60 - 64 113 182
65 - 74 169 198
75 - 84 78 125
85 and over 16 20
Table 12 - Scandia population age
Source: U.S. Census 1990 and 2000
Table 13 - Median age
Median Age
Chisago County Washington County Scandia
1990 32.2 31.5 35.6
2000 34.7 35.9 40.3
Source: U.S. Census 1990 and 2000
Current ConditionsDemographics
43Scandia Comprehensive Plan
-50 -30 -10 10 30 50 70 90
85 and over
75-84
65-74
60-64
55-59
45-54
35-44
25-34
20-24
15-19
10 -14
5 -9
Under 5
Percent Change in Population of Age GroupAge GroupAge Distribution Percent Change, 1990-2000
Washinton County
Chisago County
Scandia
Age Distribution Percent Change, 1990-2000
-50 -30 -10 10 30 50 70 90
85 and over
75-84
65-74
60-64
55-59
45-54
35-44
25-34
20-24
15-19
10 - 14
5 - 9
Under 5
Age GroupPercent Change in Population of Age Group
Washinton County
Chisago County
Scandia
Washington County
Chisago County
Scandia
Figure 2 - Age distribution percent change, 1990 - 2000
Source: U.S. Census
Households
In 2007, the Metropolitan Council estimated that Scandia had 1,490 households with 2.810
persons per household. The number of households in Scandia is projected by the Metro-
politan Council to grow to 2,100 in 2030, 62% more than the 1,294 households in 2000, as
shown in Table 14 - Scandia Household size and number. The number of households is grow-
ing at a faster rate than population growth. This indicates that the number of persons per
household will be fewer in 2030. The number of persons per household was 2.84 in 2000
and is projected to be only 2.57 in 2030. This continues a downward trend in household size
that began in the 1970s. Household size and the number of new households will influence
housing needs in Scandia.
Scandia’s household type composition changed slightly in 2000 as compared to 1990. Figure
3 - Scandia household type, compares household type in Scandia in 1990 and 2000. A greater
proportion of households consisted of married couples without children under age 18
in 2000 than in 1990. There was also a greater proportion of non-family households in
2000. Non-family households are households comprised of unmarried individuals without
children. These two trends may be explained by the growing number of older persons in
Scandia.
Scandia Household Size and Number
Actual counts Projections
Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030
Number of Households 408 851 1,060 1,294 1590 1890 2100
Persons per Household 3.87 3.36 3.02 2.84 2.75 2.65 2.57
Table 14 - Scandia household size and number
Source: U.S. Census; Metropolitan Council, New Scandia System Statement 2005.
Current ConditionsDemographics
44 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Map 12 - Household Change by TAZ, shows Washington County’s Projections for household
growth in Scandia’s seven Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ). Washington County predicts that
Scandia will grow by 618 households between 2005 and 2030. The southeast corner of
Scandia is projected to grow the most, gaining 200 additional households. The northwest
quadrant and the southwest quadrant of Scandia will each grow by 150 households. The
village of Scandia will grow by 100 households. The area directly adjacent to the St. Croix
is expected to grow only very slowly, with only 10 households projected for the northern
section along the river and four households for the southern section. The northeast quad-
rant of Scandia will also grow slowly, gaining only four new households. The TAZ growth
projections should be taken only as approximations. The precision implied is not possible
with such small areas and numbers.
Scandia is a relatively homogenous community. As shown in Table 15 - Race, in the 2000
U.S. Census, 97.9 percent of the people of Scandia listed themselves as white. The next larg-
est group in 2000 reported that they belong to two or more races. This group consisted of
only 30 people or 0.8% of the total population in Scandia. (The 2000 Census was the first
Census where respondents could choose the option of “two or more races.”) Twenty-eight
people claimed Hispanic heritage (any race) in 2000, up from 18 people in 1990.
The most common self-reported ethnicity in Scandia in 2000 was German (36.6%) as shown
in Table 16 - Ethnicity. The next most common was Swedish, followed by Norwegian and
Irish. Only 12.8% of the population claimed an ethnicity other than these four. Individuals
were allowed to claim more than one ethnicity.
Growth Projections by TAZ
Ethnicity
Figure 3 - Scandia household type
Source: U.S. Census 1990 and 2000
432
458
15 23 146
Household Type 1990
399
590
26
60 219
Household Type 2000
Married couple family with own
children under 18 years
Married couple family with no own
children under 18 years
Male householder family, no wife
present
Female householder family, no
husband present
Nonfamily households
399
590
26
60
219
Household Type 2000
Married couple family with own
children under 18 years
Married couple family with no own
children under 18 years
Male householder family, no wife
present
Female householder family, no
husband present
Nonfamily households
2000 1990
Current ConditionsDemographics
45Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Map 12 - Household Change by TAZ
Current ConditionsDemographics
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
Sd
Sd
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverHouseholds
2005 - 352
2030 - 502
43% Growth
1158
Households
2005 - 538
2030 - 688
28% Growth
Households
2005 - 123
2030 - 127
3% Growth
1251
Households
2005 - 61
2030 - 71
16% Growth
Households
2005 - 101
2030 - 105
4% Growth
Households
2005 - 213
2030 - 413
94% Growth
1252
1253
1255
1254
Households
2005 - 93
2030 - 193
108% Growth
1256
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St N
Mayberry Tr N
Saint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSai
n
t Cr
o
i
x
Tr
NM
ayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Household Change by TAZHousehold Change by TAZ
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
City Boundary
Open Water
Streams
Data Sources:
Metropolitan Council,
MN DNR
June 29, 2008
46 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Scandia - Race by Percentage
1990 2000
White 99.2 97.9
Black .1 0.2
Native American .1 0.2
Asian .4 0.6
Other race .1 0.3
Two or more races N/A 0.8
Table 15 - Race
Source: U.S. Census 1990 and 2000 Source: U.S. Census 1990 and 2000
Table 16 - Ethnicity
Ethnicity in 2000
People Claiming
Ethnicity
% of Total
Population
German 1,353 36.6
Irish 625 16.9
Norwegian 447 12.1
Swedish 799 21.6
Other 468 12.8
Educational Attainment
Between 1990 and 2000 Scandia’s adult population became more educated. The percentage
of people with college education rose while the percent of people with high school or lower
levels of education fell. A similar trend was seen in Washington County. Table 17 - Educa-
tion, shows educational attainment for the population over 25 in Washington County and
Scandia in 1990 and 2000.
Educational Attainment for Population Over 25 by Percentage
Washington County Scandia
1990 2000 1990 2000
Less than 9th grade 3.4 1.5 3.7 1.8
9th to 12th grade, no diploma 6.5 4.4 9.8 5.4
High school graduate (includes equivalency)33.3 26.0 39.9 32.4
Some college, no degree 21.1 25.8 21.8 24.3
Associate degree 9.4 8.3 6.7 8.2
Bachelor's degree 18.8 23.4 18.0 20.1
Graduate or professional degree 7.5 10.5 7.9
Table 17 - Education
Source: U.S. Census 1990 and 2000
Current ConditionsDemographics
47Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Land Use, Community Character and Public Facilities
The 1998 Scandia Comprehensive Plan described land use in Scandia as a mixture of agricul-
tural activity and scattered large lot residential development. In the past decade the balance
has shifted toward additional residential development, although agriculture still remains
an important part of the landscape. Land use and community character, sometimes called
“sense of place,” are closely linked – when residents are asked what they value about Scan-
dia they mention features such as tree-lined rural roads, the historic village center, few lights
allowing people to see the stars at night, and expansive views across farm fields, lakeshores
and the river valley. This section describes both the City’s current land use pattern and the
elements that make up this community character, as well as the City’s current zoning and its
public facilities.
Current land uses are described below and shown in Map 13 - 2007 Land Use by Parcel and
Map 14 - 2007 Land Use by Parcel, Scandia Village. These maps were created through analysis
and interpretation of Washington County property tax codes, which are not consistent with
typical land use categories, resulting in some ambiguity in the classifications. The number
of parcels, and total acreage for each land use category is summarized in Table 18 - Current
land use, 2007. This table also shows the percent of total acres in Scandia for each land use
category. The land use categories include:
• Agriculture: This broad category encompasses both agricultural activities and for-
estry, as well as other private land not classified as “developed.” Agriculture in Scandia
includes traditional row crops and animal agriculture (beef and dairy cattle), plus a
variety of more specialized operations, including goat dairying, pick-your-own berries,
hydroponic agriculture, nurseries and truck (produce) farming. (Many lots classified as
residential may also include horses or other small-scale animal husbandry.) The Agricul-
ture category still occupies the largest percentage – 39% – of the City’s land area. The
largest farms tend to be concentrated north of Scandia Trail/Highway 97 and along the
City’s southern boundary east of Olinda Trail.
• Single-Family Residential: Land classified as single-family residential encompasses
8,980 acres or 36% of the City’s area. (Although single-family detached housing is by far
the predominant housing type in the City, it is likely that this category includes some par-
cels with more than one residential unit or with accessory apartments in larger homes.)
Lot sizes range from as small as 8,000 square feet in the village center to 40 acres or
more; some residential parcels are equivalent in size to agricultural ones. Lot area for
new development is regulated by the City’s zoning ordinance, discussed below.
• Multi-Family Residential: A very small fraction of the City’s housing is identified as
multi-family (defined as two or more units in a single building). In 2000 the U.S. Census
identified only about 42 multi-family units in New Scandia Township, out of a total of
1,389 housing units. The City’s only significant multi-family development is the Oakhill
Cottages, 40 rental units in the village center, constructed by the Washington County
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in the late 1980s.
Current Land Use
Current Conditions
48 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Current Conditions
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NOakhill Rd N
Olinda Tr NSaint Croix Tr NSai
nt Cr
oi
x
Tr
NOlinda Tr NMayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 1
Miles
2007 Land Use by Parcel2007 Land Use by Parcel
Agriculture
Single Family Residential
Multi-Family Residential
Seasonal
Commercial
Commercial Recreation
Industrial
Institutional and Civic
Parks and Open Space
Extractive
Road
Utility
Other
Data Sources:
Metropolitan Council,
MN DNR, Washington
County
May 17, 2008
Land use derived from Washington County Assessor's tax classifications.
Additional classification grouping done by Cuningham Group.
Map 13 - 2007 Land Use by Parcel
Land Use, Community Character, Public Facilities
49Scandia Comprehensive Plan
?øA@
GbWX
S°
Scand ia Tr N
205th St N
Olinda Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 200 400 600
Feet
2007 Land Use by Parcel - Scandia Village2007 Land Use by Parcel - Scandia Village
Agriculture
Single Family Residential
Multi-Family Residential
Seasonal
Commercial
Commercial Recreation
Industrial
Institutional and Civic
Parks and Open Space
Extractive
Road
Utility
Other
Data Sources:
Metropolitan Council,
MN DNR, Washington
County
May 17, 2008
Location in Scandia
Land use derived from Washington County Assessor's tax classifications.
Additional classification grouping done by Cuningham Group.
Map 14 - 2007 Land Use by Parcel, Scandia Village
Current ConditionsLand Use, Community Character, Public Facilities
50 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
• Seasonal Residential: Many shoreland residential properties around lakes or the St.
Croix River were originally built as seasonal residences, and 168 parcels were still clas-
sified as “seasonal” in 2007. The majority of these are single-family detached homes,
including some manufactured homes on individual lots.
• Commercial: Commercial land uses consist mainly of retail, service and office busi-
nesses in the village center and the Scandia Plaza center on Scandia Trail, a few business-
es in the historic village of Copas (Abrahamson Nurseries), and several widely scattered
rural businesses such as the Big Marine Store on Manning Trail. Some of the largest
properties classified as “commercial” for tax purposes are listed below under “Commer-
cial Recreation” and “Extractive.”
• Commercial Recreation: This category includes only two businesses on relatively large
parcels in the northwest part of the City: the Eko Backen recreational area (snow-tubing
hills, picnic facilities and outdoor water park) and the Ironwood golf range on Highway
97.
• Industrial properties are all located within the City’s business park east of the village
center, and include primarily light manufacturing and warehouse/distribution uses, as
well as a limited number of office and service uses.
• Institutional and Civic: This land use category includes most public, semi-public and
private institutional uses that are not classified as parks or open space, such as churches,
the elementary school, the Community Center and Fire Hall, the Gammelgarden Mu-
seum, and private camps.
• Parks and Open Space: This category includes City, County and State parks and other
land owned by these units of government and protected for conservation purposes.
Examples include floodplain and other riparian lands within the St. Croix National Sce-
nic Riverway, the Rustrum Wildlife Management Area and the Fall Creek Scientific and
Natural Area.
• Extractive Uses: This category includes the City’s three active sand and gravel mining
operations in two areas of the City. These land uses are sometimes classified as “indus-
trial” but are distinguished here because of their more rural locations.
• Road and Utility Uses: These categories include small areas of land within road, rail-
road or utility rights-of-way and other uses such as stormwater basins.
• Other: This category indicates currently vacant or inactive commercial or industrial
uses (for example, around the intersection of Highways 97 and 95).
• Water and Wetlands: A final category is that of open water: lakes, streams and ponds,
which occupy about 12% of the City’s land area. About 2,800 acres, or 11.5% of the
City’s area, are classified as wetland.
Current ConditionsLand Use, Community Character, Public Facilities
51Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Table 18 – Current land use, 2007
Land Use Parcels Acreage Percentage
Agriculture 443 9,657.3 39.1%
Single-Family Residential 2,067 8,979.8 36.4%
Multi-Family Residential 3 30.1 0.1%
Seasonal 168 215.1 0.9%
Commercial 30 19.4 0.1%
Commercial Recreation 3 62.5 0.3%
Industrial 8 24.1 0.1%
Extractive 11 410.8 1.7%
Institutional and Civic 25 300.2 1.2%
Parks and Open Space 233 1,858.7 7.5%
Road 85 49.9 0.2%
Utility 15 26.4 0.1%
Other 12 41.4 0.2%
Open Water*n/a 3,027.5 12.3%
Total Acreage 24,703.2 100.0%
The 1998 New Scandia Comprehensive Plan also analyzed land use as of 1996. These are
compared with the 2007 land use pattern in Table 19 - Land use acreage and percentages. Differ-
ent categories were used in 1996, but it is apparent that the percentage devoted to all resi-
dential categories has increased from about 25% to over 37%, while acreage in agriculture
has decreased. (The 1996 “agriculture/natural area” category is not directly comparable to
the 2007 “agriculture” category.)
Land Use Change Since 1998
Table 19 – Land use acreage and percentages, 1996 and 2007
*Note: portions of prop-
erties under water have
been deducted from land
use totals
Source: Washington
County Assessor;
CR Planning
Note: discrepancies in total area and in calculated water bodies and rights-
of-way are due to differences in methodology and mapping technology.
1996 Land Use 2007 Land Use
Use Acres % of Total Use Acres % of Total
Agricultural/Natural Areas 11,813 47.1 Agriculture 9,657 39.1
Residential 6,208 24.8 Residential 9225.0 37.3
Business & Mining 355 1.4
Commercial,
Comm. Rec. Indus-
trial & Extractive
434.9 1.8
Public/Semi-Public 1,888 7.5
Institutional &
Civic, Parks &
Opens Space
2158.9 8.7
Lakes 2,746 11.0 Open Water 3,027.5 12.3
Wetlands 991 4.0 n/a
Rights-of-Way 1,055 4.2 Roads, Utilities 76.3 0.3
Total Area 25,056 100.0 Total Area 24,703 100.0
Source: Washington County Assessor;
CR Planning
Current ConditionsLand Use, Community Character, Public Facilities
52 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Scandia’s current zoning ordinance is the same code that was adopted by the Township in
June, 1999, with some revisions including revisions to the Shoreland Ordinance, Floodplain
Ordinance, and updates to the Open Space Conservation Development provisions. As
regulated by State law, townships are authorized to adopt and enforce their own zoning ordi-
nances, provided that the regulations conform to or are more restrictive than County zoning
regulations. Scandia’s ordinance is therefore similar in many respects to that of Washington
County, adopted in 1997.
The City is divided into six zoning districts, as follows. There are three types of allowed use
in each district: primary (permitted), allowed with a Certificate of Compliance, or allowed
under a Conditional Use Permit. Additional regulations also apply to specific types of
development.
• AP, Agricultural Preserves. This district applies only to those parcels of land that
have been restricted under the Agricultural Preserves Program (Statute 473H). This
voluntary program for the seven-county metropolitan area allows landowners to place
their properties under a restrictive covenant committing the property to agricultural use,
in exchange for certain benefits. These include a special tax rate calculated based on
agricultural value rather than market value, a property tax credit of at least $1.50 per acre
per year, protection of normal farm practice, and protection against special assessments
for public improvement projects. Properties in the program must be designated by the
local unit of government and zoned for a density of no more than one dwelling unit per
40 acres.
• AG, Agricultural District. This district is intended “to preserve land for interim agri-
cultural uses and to preserve the rural character of the [City].” Maximum density within
the AG District is 4 dwelling units per 40 acres (1 per 10). Lot sizes may be 2 to 4 acres
in size, or 20 acres or more, a technique known as “lot averaging” with the intent of
encouraging a variety of lot sizes.
• SR, Semi-Rural District. This district is intended to provide for rural low-density
housing in areas that are not considered capable of supporting long-term agricultural
activities. Maximum density is 8 dwelling units per 40 acres (1 per 5). Minimum lot size
is 5 acres for conventional subdivision or 2 acres if lot averaging is used.
• SFE, Single-Family Estate District. The purpose of this district is to provide lots
large enough to maintain a semi-rural setting but not large enough to support long-term
agricultural activities. Maximum density is 16 units per 40 acres (1 per 2.5), with mini-
mum lot sizes of 2.5 acres for conventional subdivision or 2 acres for lot averaging.
• RB, Retail Business District. This district is intended to provide for a mix of retail
and commercial businesses. Uses are similar to those currently found in the village cen-
ter, including government buildings, offices, retail sales and restaurants. Minimum lot
size is 2.5 acres.
• GB, General Business District. This district is intended to provide for a mix of com-
mercial and industrial businesses, generally not abutting major roadways. Minimum lot
size is 2.5 acres.
• FP, Floodplain Overlay District. This district defines floodplain boundaries and al-
lowed uses. This ordinance meets FEMA requirements for flood insurance.
Current Zoning
Current ConditionsLand Use, Community Character, Public Facilities
53Scandia Comprehensive Plan
The zoning ordinance also includes special requirements for the Village Center as defined in
the Comprehensive Plan. These include requirements for interconnected streets or dedi-
cated trailways at the end of cul-de-sacs, protection of views, setbacks of garages to match
buildings’ front façades, sidewalks on at least one side of each street, decorative lighting,
and underground utilities. In the current city code (2008) all Village Center development
requires a conditional use permit.
There are three overlay districts within the City: the Floodplain District; the Shoreland
Overlay District; and the Lower St. Croix River Bluffland Overlay District. The Floodplain
District ordinance was adopted by the City in March 2008. The Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources and the Federal Emergency Management Agency subsequently approved
the Floodplain ordinance and notified the City that property owners in floodplain area may
qualify for federal flood insurance. The City adopted Shoreland Management Regulations in
December 2007, meeting Department of Natural Resources standards. The DNR classifies
all water bodies in one of three classes, Natural Environment, Recreational Development
and General Development. A minimum lot size of 2.5 acres and a minimum lot width of
150 feet is required on all riparian lots (the first tier of lots along the shoreline) on lakes
classified as Recreational Development lakes and on Goose Lake. On all other lakes (clas-
sified as Natural Environment lakes) a minimum lot size of 5 acres for riparian lots and a
minimum lot width of 300 feet is required. The ordinance also establishes setbacks from or-
dinary high water level and top of bluff, sets a maximum impervious coverage limit of 25%,
and limits shoreland alterations such as cutting of vegetation. Vegetative buffers are required
around all Natural Environment lakes, some types of wetlands, and stormwater ponds.
The St. Croix district regulates development within the St. Croix National Scenic Riverway,
as mandated by the National Park Service. The ordinance references the standards of the
Washington County Development Code along with the minimum density requirements of
the AG District (4 units per 40 acres). Many of the district standards are similar to those of
the Shoreland Overlay District, with some additional requirements; for example, the exterior
color of new and renovated structures must be of “earth or summer vegetation tones, unless
completely screened from the river.”
Nestled among rolling hills and many
beautiful lakes, Scandia actually is
made up of a number of communi-
ties which lie within Scandia Township.
The names of these communities are
suggested by the various lakes: Goose
Lake, Hay Lake, Bone (or Bonny) Lake,
Fish Lake, Big Marine Lake, Sand Lake,
Long Lake, Horseshoe Lake, Moody
Lake, Halfbreed Lake (now known
as Lake Sylvan). Other names recall
settlements of long ago, though now
they represent no more than clus-
ters of homes: Prairie Hollow (also
known as Panola) Vasa (now Copas),
Otisville, and the St. Croix District.
Anna Engquist, Scandia – Then and
Now. Washington County Historical
Society, 1974 (reprinted 2006)
The term “rural character” and the desire to maintain that character
are frequently mentioned in comments at public meetings, respons-
es to community surveys, and even in the statements of purpose in
the City’s zoning ordinance. Residents also mention how difficult
it is to define “rural character,” and suggest that it is often in the
eye of the beholder. “Community character,” the term used in this
section, is a term that acknowledges the diversity of landscapes
found in Scandia, from the heavily wooded St. Croix River valley to
the central crossroads of the village center. This section attempts
to define these distinctive landscapes within the City, referring to
them as “character districts.” A character district can be defined as
a place, or a series of places within the City with distinctive natural,
scenic, cultural or historical attributes. Character districts can be
thought of as another ‘layer’ of land use; one that captures some of
the qualities that residents value in their community.
Community Character
Current ConditionsLand Use, Community Character, Public Facilities
54 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Table 20 - Elements to consider in assessing historic rural landscapes - examples
The following character districts, shown on Map 15 - Character Districts, have been identified
through fieldwork and discussions with the Comprehensive Plan Committee and with focus
group and workshop participants. This is not a complete survey; descriptions are brief and
further research is encouraged.
Historic Settlements:
Current or former central places, including the Village Center and existing or former hamlets
or crossroads settlements.
• Scandia Village Center: The village center is literally and figuratively the
heart of the community and its commercial, cultural and civic center. Its
street pattern is characterized by triangles formed by converging major roads
at a high point between valleys, interconnected by a grid of local streets. Lo-
cal landmarks include historic commercial buildings, Elim Lutheran Church
and cemetery, and the Gammelgarden Museum. Cultural and civic activities
center on the same buildings, as well as the Community Center and park. The
village center is architecturally diverse, with a variety of early 20th-century
commercial building types, the barn-like museum and its outbuildings, and
the Gothic Revival style of the church, built in 1931 after previous buildings
were destroyed by fire. The formal gardens of the Elim cemetery offer an
attractive site for community events. Sidewalks in some locations encourage
pedestrian movement. Boundaries are defined by topography, views as one
approaches the village, and the Elementary School property to the west.
• Copas: Once a free-standing village centered on a Soo Line railroad depot
(the railroad between the Twin Cities and Duluth), Copas is now a largely
residential hamlet with a few commercial buildings (Abrahamson Nurseries)
fronting Highway 95. The majority of the remaining buildings are located on
a number of tree-lined residential streets that parallel the river.
Land Uses and Activities fields, pastures, cemeteries, village centers
Patterns of Spatial Organization property divisions, circulation patterns
Response to the Natural Environment building siting, materials, orientation
Cultural Traditions ethnic or religious institutions, craftsmanship, patterns of land division
Circulation Networks paths, roads, streams, highways, waterways
Boundary Demarcations fences, walls, hedgerows, ditches
Vegetation Related to Land Use woodlots, orchards, groves, pastures, treelines
Buildings, Structures and Objects residences, barns, outbuildings, bridges, monuments
Clusters village centers, farmsteads, crossroads
Archeological Sites road traces, ruins of foundations, landings, railroad grades
Small-scale Elements foot bridges, road markers, gravestones, fence posts
Current ConditionsLand Use, Community Character, Public Facilities
1Guidelines for Evaluating and Documenting Rural Historic Landscapes.
National Register Bulletin 30, National Park Service.
The approach to identifying character districts is based in part on a guidebook developed by
the National Park Service to evaluate historic rural landscapes.1 It uses a series of elements,
as shown in Table 20 - Elements to consider in assessing historic rural landscapes.
55Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Map 15 - Character Districts
Current ConditionsLand Use, Community Character, Public Facilities
kj
kj
kj
kjkjkj
kj
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
St. Croix River CorridorBig Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
Oakhill Rd N
2 0 5 th S t N
240th St N
Lofton Ave N185th St N
Mayberry Tr N Nolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N Oli
nda Tr
N17 7th St N Pil
a
r Rd
N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Manning Tr NMel
ani
e Tr
NOxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Ostrum Tr NKeystone Ave NMay Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NOlinda Tr NOakhill Rd N
Old Marine Tr NSai
n
t Cr
oi
x
Tr
N1 7 7 t h S t NMayber
r
y Tr
NSaint Croix Tr NOlinda Tr N240 th S t N
Sai
nt Croi
x Tr NManning Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Character DistrictsCharacter Districts
City Boundary
Section Lines
kj Historic Site
kj Local Landmark
Scenic Road
Historic Settlement
Neighborhood
Agricultural District
Gateway Point Data Sources: MN DNR
Metropolitan Council,
Cuningham Group
June 7, 2008
kjkjkj
OLINDA TRL NOAKHI
LL RD N2 0 5 T H S T N
S C A N D I A T R L NOREN AVE NOZARK AVE NEnlargement of Scandia Village
56 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
• Former Hamlets and Historical Localities: Otisville, Big Lake and
Panola (a post office located just north of the City boundary) were all rural
settlements of which few if any traces remain. The Log House Landing site
near the former hamlet of Otisville, where Swedish immigrants disembarked
from steamboats in the 1850s, remains as a water access site for boaters.
The Big Lake School and Goose Lake School sites also remain as touch-
stones of Scandia’s history.
Lake Settlements:
Residential clusters are found around many of Scandia’s lakes, including:
• The north, west and southeast sides of Big Marine Lake
• Hay and Sand Lakes
• Bone Lake
• Goose Lake
Each of these clusters has its own character. The southeastern and western
shorelines of Big Marine Lake is characterized by small lots and small seasonal
cottages, many now converted to year-round residences. Most of the other lake-
shore communities are characterized by larger houses on a single tier of residen-
tial lots. Several lakeshore communities have formed lake associations that work
to improve water quality.
St. Croix River Community:
Residential clusters along the St. Croix, while geographically dispersed, can be
characterized as a single community, ranging from the Cedar Cliff neighborhood
at the northern end to Copas in the south. The steep and heavily wooded bluffs
and hillsides have created a pattern of large lots and well-hidden homes. St.
Croix National Scenic Riverway regulations (the overlay district mentioned above
under Zoning) also require building profiles and colors that blend with their sur-
roundings. Residents tend to identify with the entire river corridor rather than
with the City. Public access to the river is limited to the Log House Landing and
sites in William O’Brien State Park.
Agricultural Districts:
While agricultural properties are found throughout the City, several areas are
dominated by larger farms and relatively uninterrupted agricultural activities.
The largest of these areas extends throughout the north-central part of the City,
mainly north of Scandia Trail/Highway 97, and south on the northwest side of
Big Marine Lake. A smaller agricultural district, known as Rosengren Prairie, is
located along the City’s southern boundary between Big Marine Lake and Wil-
liam O’Brien State Park; another district is located on either side of St. Croix
Trail/Highway 95 north of Highway 97.
Scenic Road Corridors:
Many of the City’s roads offer scenic views, but a few have been identified as
particularly attractive throughout their entire length. St. Croix Trail/Highway 95
Current ConditionsLand Use, Community Character, Public Facilities
57Scandia Comprehensive Plan
is a State Scenic Byway, and is characterized by its sweeping views of wooded
hillsides, farmland, and glimpses of the river valley. The road networks to the
north of Big Marine Lake, Pilar Road and Quinnell Avenue are narrow and
heavily forested, providing a sense of enclosure and small-scale views of woods,
wetlands, farmsteads and attractive residential properties. Other scenic roads
may be identified through fieldwork.
Gateway Points:
Several places along the City’s road networks offer a sense of arrival into the
City as a whole or into the village center. The intersections of Highway 97 with
Manning Avenue on the west and Highway 95 on the east are considered entry
points to the City, and might be appropriate for gateway features (decorative
signage, landscaping, etc.) Village entry points offer views into the village center
or are marked by historic buildings such as the Hay Lake School.
Scenic Views:
The City is in the midst of an innovative project to identify and assess scenic
views, using a methodology developed by the National Park Service. The Visual
Quality Analysis (VQA) method was developed and used extensively for the
Blue Ridge Parkway in North Carolina and Virginia, and is being adapted for
use in more urban areas, including the Mississippi National River and Recreation
Area in Minnesota. The method uses a citizen committee to identify and assess
views based on several parameters:
• Vividness – to what extent does a view possess qualities such as expansive-
ness, framing, depth and variety?
• Intactness – how altered is the view from its original or “ideal” state?
• Uniqueness – how unique is the view within its locality or larger region?
• Duration – how long is one’s experience of the view (depending on mode
of transportation, etc.)
By conducting fieldwork and determining these assessments as a group, the
Committee can produce more supportable results than those based on individual
judgments. Global Positioning Systems and GIS can be used to pinpoint the
locations of viewpoints. The result of the process may be the establishment
of planning policies and strategies for scenic view protection as part of the
Comprehensive Plan. The process can also be used to identify priority areas
for conservation or protection of scenic elements and to educate and consult
with landowners and developers on how to integrate scenic view protection into
development plans.
Scandia’s Comprehensive Plan Committee members participated in the National
Park Service training on the VQA method in October 2007 and organized a task
force of members to begin identifying views in Spring of 2008. Approximately
75 viewpoints throughout the City have been identified and mapped using GPS.
The Committee is now undertaking the assessment process.
Current ConditionsLand Use, Community Character, Public Facilities
58 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Community Facilities
Community facilities include both buildings and services
that the City provides to its citizens and the general public.
Public Safety
The City of Scandia Fire Department is located in the
recently constructed Fire Hall on Scandia Trail/Highway
97, which it shares with the Public Works Department. The
City of Scandia Fire and Rescue has twenty-eight volunteers
who respond to all medical emergencies: fourteen Emergen-
cy Medical Technicians and eight First Responders. On-site
fire training occurs twenty-four days per year. Scandia pro-
vides police services through a contract with the Washington
County Sheriff’s Department.
Senior/Community Center
The Scandia Senior/Community Center was built in 1986 and has become an important part
of community life. It is used by many groups and organizations. It contains the city office,
City Council meeting chambers, a hall seating 220 for dinners, and a full service kitchen.
The hall can be rented for private parties, weddings, and other occasions.
Solid Waste Management
Scandia is serviced by two refuse haulers. Forest Lake Sanitation, which uses the Washington
County Resource Recovery Facility in Newport; and Waste Management which uses their
own facility in Bruce, Wisconsin. Both companies provide for pick-up of recyclables.
Private On-site Septic Systems
Wastewater treatment for the residents of Scandia consists primarily of on-site septic
systems. Washington County has record of 1,394 on-site septic systems within the City of
Scandia. Responsibility for installation and maintenance of on-site septic systems lies with
the owner of the property where the system is located. All systems must be installed and
maintained to meet the standards for individual subsurface sewage treatment systems (ISTS)
in Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080. The City has delegated responsibility for septic inspections
to Washington County. Washington County Ordinance 128, Section 17.2, requires owner’s
of septic systems to have tanks pumped at least once every 3 years. Many lending institu-
tions request inspections at the point of sale, and these inspections are recorded with the
County. If Washington County becomes aware of non-compliant systems, the County
requires replacement of those systems.
Public Wastewater Treatment Systems
In addition to on-site septic systems, there are three public wastewater treatment systems
located in Scandia that serve multiple lots and structures. The operation, maintenance, and
user charges for these public systems are governed by City of Scandia Ordinance No. 108.
Wastewater Treatment
Current ConditionsLand Use, Community Character, Public Facilities
59Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Bliss Sewage Treatment Facility
The Bliss Sewage Treatment Facility’s treatment area is located on the western side of Big
Marine Lake, off of Manning Trail North as shown on Map 16 - Big Marine Lake Area Waste-
water Utilities. The facility serves homes along Manning Trail North from the treatment area
north to 191st Street North. Service continues east along 191st Street North to the homes
along Langley Ave. North, Layton Ave. North, Lamar Ave. North, and 185th Street North.
The facility currently serves 78 units and has the capacity to serve 12 additional units. It pro-
cesses an annual average of 15,000 gallons per day, but has a permitted capacity of 19,800
gallons per day.
Anderson/Erikson Sewage Treatment Facility
The Anderson/Erikson Sewage Treatment Facility’s treatment area is located on the eastern
side of Big Marine Lake at the southern end of Norell Ave. North. The system serves the
homes along Norrel Ave. North and those along 188th Street North to the intersection with
Newgate Ave. North as shown on Map 16 - Big Marine Lake Area Wastewater Utilities. Ap-
proximately 37 homes are located in the service area. The system could accommodate the
last two homes at the intersection of 188th and Newgate Ave., but any other additions would
require additional studies to assess the system’s capacity and possible expansion.
Village Wastewater Community Collector System
The Village Wastewater Community Collector System’s treatment area is located on Olinda
Trail North, southeast of the village as shown on Map 17 - Village Area Wastewater and Drink-
ing Water Utilities. The system serves Elim Lutheran Church and the parsonage, the Scandia
Café, the Scandia Store, the Scandia Veterinary Clinic, the Country Messenger, the bank
building, Schmitt Mall, the Community and Senior Center, and the Gammelgarden. The
system was expanded in 1999 for the Community Center and again in 2001 for the Gammel-
garden. A 2005 study indicated that the system is operating at approximately 90% capacity.
While the current system is an in-ground trench drainfield, future expansions will require the
installation of a mound system. The City owns land suitable for future expansion.
As with waste water treatment, most residences and businesses in Scandia are served by on-
site drinking water wells installed and maintained by the landowner. There are three commu-
nity drinking water wells in the village area that serve multiple residences and businesses. In
addition, there is a public well serving the Fire Department and Public Works building. The
service areas and well locations are shown on Map 17 - Village Area Wastewater and Drinking
Water Utilities, and briefly described below.
Minnesota Rules Chapter 4720 require the development of Wellhead Protection Plans
(WHPP). Scandia Elementary has worked with the Minnesota Department of Health and
completed Phase I of the WHPP. The City will eventually be required to complete WHPPs
for all public water supply systems.
Drinking Water and Fire Hall Water Services
Current ConditionsLand Use, Community Character, Public Facilities
60 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Hilltop Water Company
The Hilltop Water Company is a private water system that serves 21 homes and businesses
in the village center. Its service area extends along Olinda Trail North from Highway 97 to
Oakhill Road, and along Oakhill Road. The well was drilled in 1980.
Scandia Water Company
The Scandia Water Company is a private water system that serves 19 properties along Olinda
Trail North to the north of Highway 97.
Uptown Well/Scandia Community Center Well
The Uptown Well is located at the Scandia Senior/Community Center, 14727 209th Street.
North. The well was completed in June 1996, and is 463 ft. deep. It serves the Senior/
Community Center and a number of properties within the village including Elim Church
and parsonage, the Gammelgarden, and the ice rink warming house. Between August 2006
and July 2007, 720,370 gallons of water were pumped from the well.
New Scandia Fire Hall Well
The New Scandia Fire Hall Well is located to the north of Highway 97 at the intersection
of Ozark Ave. North. The well was completed in May 2000, and is 790 ft. deep. The well
serves the Fire Department and Public Works, which are both located in the Fire Hall.
Current ConditionsLand Use, Community Character, Public Facilities
61Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Map 16 – Big Marine Lake Area Wastewater Utilities
Current ConditionsLand Use, Community Character, Public Facilities
GoWX
Big Marine Lake
White Rock Lake
Manning Tr N180th St N
185th St N Langley Ave NLayton Ave N192nd St N
191st St N
Lamar
Av
e NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 1,000500
Feet
Big Marine Lake Area Wastewater UtilitiesBig Marine Lake Area Wastewater Utilities
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
City Boundary
Streams
Open Water
Parcels
Treatment Area
Service Area
Data Sources:
MnDOT, MN DNR,
City of Scandia
October 20, 2008
GbWX
Big Marine Lake
Long Lake
Olinda Tr N188th St N
195th St N
182nd St N Norell Ave NNewgate Ave NLaka
m
aga Tr N
185th St NMayberry Tr NBliss Addition Anderson / Erickson
Addition
62 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Map 17 – Village Area Wastewater and Drinking Water Utilities
Current ConditionsLand Use, Community Character, Public Facilities
k
k
Uptown
Well
Fire Hall Well
k Hilltop
Water Co.
Well
Village
Wastewater
Community
Septic Area
Goose Lake
Oa
k
h
ill Rd
N
Olinda Tr NScandia Tr N
205 th S t N
P
aris
h
R
d
N
Novak Ave NOldfield Ave NOzark Ave NOstrum Ave NOren Ave N215th St NOlinda La NOxboro Ave NOakhill Ct N214th St N
2 0 9 t h S t N Penrose Ave N209th St N
City of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 1,000500
Feet
Village Area Wastewater
and Drinking Water Utilities
Village Area Wastewater
and Drinking Water Utilities
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
City Boundary
Streams
Open Water
Data Sources:
MnDOT, MN DNR,
City of Scandia
June 8, 2008
Parcels
Scandia Water Co.
Service Area
Uptown Well
Service Area
Hilltop Water Co.
Service Area
Village Wastewater
Community Septic Area
k Public Well
63Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Housing
Age of Housing Stock
Scandia’s housing stock is predominantly of recent construction, although a significant
number of homes date from Scandia’s rural past. As shown in Figure 4 - Age of housing stock,
Data from the 2000 Census show that a large portion (39%) of Scandia’s housing stock was
built during the 1970s. Prior to the 1970s Scandia (New Scandia Township) was almost
exclusively a very-low density agricultural community except for the unincorporated village
area, with most housing having been built prior to 1939. In the 1970s the suburban expan-
sion reached the Scandia area and the number of non-farm homes increased significantly.
The older housing stock was, in 2000, only 19% of all housing. The housing boom acceler-
ated in the 1990’s – according to the 2000 Census results, 15.4% of Scandia’s 1,200 housing
units were built during the 1990’s.
Figure 4 - Age of housing stock
Age of Housing Stock
City of Scandia, 2000
1995 to 2000
7%
1990 to 1994
9%
1980 to 1989
11%
1970 to 1979
39%
1960 to 1969
3%
1950 to 1959
10%
1940 to 1949
2%
1939 or earlier
19%
Source: U.S. Census 2000
Since 2000, the rate of construction has continued, with almost 30 single-family homes be-
ing built each year (175 over six years from 2001 to 2006). Over 70% of Scandia’s housing
units have been built since 1970, and over 60% have been built in the last 25 years.
Recent construction trends show a slowing of new construction, consistent with the hous-
ing market for the metropolitan region. The 2006-2007 rate of issuance for new building
permits is less than half the annual number issued between 2000 and 2006.
Current Conditions
64 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
By far the majority of housing units in Scandia and Washington County are owner occupied.
Scandia had a smaller portion of renter-occupied housing units than Washington County in
both 1990 and 2000 as indicated in Table 21 - Renter vs. owner occupied housing units. The ratio
of renter occupied units to owner occupied units remained relatively unchanged between
1990 and 2000 for both Scandia and Washington County.
Housing Ownership
Renter vs. Owner Occupied Housing Units
1990 2000
% Renter % Owner % Renter % Owner
Scandia 6 94 6 94
Washington County 16 84 14 86
Source: U.S. Census 1990 and 2000
The number of housing units in Scandia increased 16% between 1990 and 2000. Table 22
- Number of housing units in structure, describes the growth in the number of housing units in
various types of structures between 1990 and 2000. Most of these additional housing units
were single family, detached homes (176 units). Mobile homes and trailers accounted for the
next largest increase in units between 1990 and 2000; 13 additional units. Four additional
units located in structures with five to nine housing units were also constructed between
1990 and 2000, as were two additional town houses or duplex units.
The majority of housing units in Scandia have historically been single unit detached struc-
tures. Town homes and duplexes were next largest followed by structures with five to nine
housing units. The housing unit category with the smallest number of units in Scandia is
mobile homes and trailers. Scandia has no large multi-family structures with 10 or more
housing units.
Type of Housing
Scandia Number of Housing Units in Structure
1990 2000
Percent
Change
Single unit detached 1156 1,332 15
Town homes and duplexes 25 26 4
3 or 4 units 0 0 0
5 to 9 units 14 16 14
10 or more 0 0 0
Mobile home or trailer 2 15 650
Total 1197 1389 16
Source: U.S. Census 1990 and 2000
Table 21 - Renter vs. owner occupied housing units
Table 22 - Number of housing units in structure
Current ConditionsHousing
65Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Census data report on the number of housing units associated with working farms. Starting
with the post World War II era (post 1950) nearly all new housing has been characterized by
the Census as nonfarm housing. By 1990 the number of farm housing units was less than
10% of the total housing units. Between 1990 and 2000 the number of nonfarm housing
units in Scandia has gone up (from 1,111 in 1990 to 1,329 in 2000) and the number of farm
housing units has gone down (from 86 in 1990 to 60 in 2000) (see Figure 5 - Farm vs nonfarm
housing units in Scandia). While agriculture is still a significant land use in Scandia, the number
of housing units associated with farms is continuing to decrease.
Farm and Nonfarm Housing Units
Nonfarm Farm
Nonfarm Farm
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Number of Housing Units
1990
2000
Farm vs. Nonfarm Housing Units
Figure 5 - Farm vs. nonfarm housing units in Scandia
Source: U.S. Census 1990 and 2000
Value of Housing Stock
Most of the housing built in Scandia in the last 15 years has been in the upper end of the
value spectrum for Washington and Chisago counties. The value of Scandia’s housing stock
has gone up dramatically between 1990 and 2000. As Figure 6 - Value of housing stock il-
lustrates, Scandia housing values reported in the 1990 Census were generally similar to
Washington and Chisago counties. Scandia and the rest of Washington County showed a
skew toward more highly valued homes, while Chisago County showed a slight skew toward
the lower end of the value spectrum. In 1990, most homes in all three areas were valued
between $60,000 and $120,000. By 2000, Scandia’s housing values were much more skewed
to the high end of the scale than either Washington or Chisago County.
Current ConditionsHousing
66 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
The median value of homes in Chisago County, Washington County, and Scandia all went up
considerably between 1990 and 2000 (see Table 23 - Median home values) consistent with the
state-wide trend during the decade. While Chisago County saw the greatest percent change
in median home values, Scandia had the highest median home value in both 1990 and 2000.
Figure 6 - Value of housing stock in 1990 and 2000
Source: U.S. Census 1990 and 2000
Median Home Values
Chisago County Washington County Scandia
2000 132,500 156,200 177,700
1990 72,900 94,100 99,300
Percent Change 82%66%79%
Table 23 - Median home values
Source: U.S. Census 1990 and 2000
Current Conditions
1990 Housing Values
2000 Housing Values
Housing
67Scandia Comprehensive Plan
The Census also reports on the number of rooms and bedrooms in each community’s hous-
ing units. Between 1990 and 2000 in Scandia the number of bedrooms per housing unit
went down, but the number of rooms per house went up. Figure 7 - Bedrooms per housing unit,
shows the number of homes in Scandia with 0 to 5 or more bedrooms. Figure 8 - Rooms
per housing unit, shows the number of homes in Scandia with 1 to 9 or more rooms. The
responses could indicate both a building trend toward houses with more alternative rooms
such as offices or recreation rooms, or an increased interest in characterizing extra bedrooms
differently in 2000, relative to 1990.
Number of Rooms and Bedrooms per Unit
Bedrooms Per Housing Unit in Scandia
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
None 1 2 3 4 5 or more
Bedrooms per Housing Unit# of Housing Units1990 2000
Figure 7 - Bedrooms per housing unit
Source: U.S. Census 1990 and 2000
Figure 8 - Rooms per housing unit
Rooms Per Housing Unit in Scandia
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 or
moreRooms per Housing Unit# of Housing Units1990 2000
Source: U.S. Census 1990 and 2000
Current ConditionsHousing
68 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Number of Building Permits By Year
City of Scandia
30 33 33 28 35
16
83 66
96
86
99
82
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006# of PermitsMech/Plumbing
Other
Commercial
Accessory Buildings
Townhome New
Single Family Remodel
Single Family New
Number of Building Permits by Year
City of Scandia
Vacancy Rates
Vacancy rates have been consistently low in Scandia, with very few housing units vacant in
either 1990 or 2000. Census data identified only three vacancies in Scandia in 1990 and eight
vacancies in 2000. The Washington County Housing and Redevelopment Authority study
(see final section of this report) similarly noted vacancy rates well below what is considered a
“normal” market. Such low vacancy rates for a community that is seeing consistent growth
generally demonstrates a demand for housing (both owner-occupied and rental) that exceeds
supply.
The number of housing permits issued per year in Scandia has fluctuated between 2001 and
2007. A steady upward or downward trend is not apparent (see Figure 9 - Number of building
permits by year). The fewest permits were issued in 2006 and the most were issued in 2003.
Single family remodeling permits have been the most common permit issued since 2001 (578
permits), followed by accessory building (192) and single family new (181) permits.
Although remodeling permits are the most commonly issued permit, new single family
building permits accounted for the greatest value between 2001 and 2006. The value of per-
mits grew between 2001 and 2005. However, there was a sharp drop in the value of permits
in 2006, reflecting the drop in the number of new single family home permits. Total permit
value was $16,049,295 in 2005 and $7,886,995 in 2006.
Figure 9 - Number of building permits by year
Source: City of Scandia
Housing Permits
Current ConditionsHousing
69Scandia Comprehensive Plan
As suggested in the data above, Scandia has relatively fewer housing opportunities for middle
and low income families when compared to surrounding communities. Much of the new
construction is targeted to people with higher incomes who can afford more costly homes
and to people desiring larger homes, such as families. Larger houses are consistent with the
higher median household size in Scandia compared to Washington County (Scandia’s median
household size is noticeably higher, see the demographic background section). Larger and
more expensive homes are also consistent with the very low number (relative to the county-
wide data) of young adults who live in Scandia, as few housing choices are available for
households with below-median incomes.
As the population ages, demand for larger homes is expected to taper off. While Scandia’s
low vacancy rate shows that demand continues to outpace supply, the housing market in the
metropolitan area has been shifting toward a preference for smaller homes on small lots.
These trends pose difficult questions as to how Scandia should plan for housing into the
future.
In 2000, Washington County conducted a housing needs analysis (A Comprehensive Study
of Housing Needs In Washington County, Minnesota; Maxfield Research, WCHRA, 2001).
The findings identified specific needs within Washington County for entry-level housing,
moderately-priced rental housing, and small market niches such as transitional housing. The
study also examined eight distinct housing markets within the County, including the North-
east Market Area that included Scandia, Marine on St. Croix, and May Township. Similar to
the County-wide findings, the analysis concluded that the Northeast Market Area had unmet
needs in the following housing market segments:
• Market rate and subsidized general occupancy rental housing;
• Market rate and subsidized senior housing;
• Affordable for-sale housing, including both single-family and townhome types.
The study specifically noted Oakhill Cottages as an example of a successful senior housing
development, but also recommended that additional efforts may be needed if local govern-
ment wanted to proactively address the evolution of the housing market over the next 10-15
years (WCHRA, p. 196).
Housing Choice and Affordable Housing
Current ConditionsHousing
70 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
The Washington County Housing and Redevelopment Authority (WCHRA) offers three
programs for cities interested in affordable housing. These programs include bond financ-
ing, low income housing tax credits, and the “Grow Fund” which assists developers with
gap financing for affordable housing developments. Gap financing is an interim loan that
finances the difference between the more traditional loans and the total capital needs of a
given project.
Bond financing includes tax-exempt or taxable revenue bonds and conduit bonds. Conduit
bonds are bonds whose repayment is the responsibility of the business or developer who
benefits from the financing, rather than the issuer, who only collects the taxes, fees or rev-
enues and passes them on to the bondholder. The City of Woodbury and the City of New-
port have received conduit bonds from the WCHRA for affordable housing development.
Developers can apply for low income housing tax credits through the WCHRA to provide a
subsidy for this market niche. The WCHRA has recently issued tax credits for two projects
in Woodbury and one project in Stillwater.
Washington County Affordable Housing Programs
Current ConditionsHousing
71Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Economic Base and Community Development
The City of Scandia is a rural and ex-urban community with a small but growing economic
base. The City, until very recently a township, has an economic base quite typical of rural
communities near metropolitan areas. The primary economic industry, when viewed as a
land use, is agriculture. Scandia has a town center in the historic village area, and a small
amount of industrial activity in several locations. As development accelerated in and around
Scandia over the last 20 years, additional commercial investment occurred in and near the
village area and in areas where increased road traffic was sufficient to support traffic-oriented
businesses.
As development continues to occur, the opportunity for certain types of new economic-
oriented investment will also grow. The dramatic rise in the number of households in
northern Washington County and Chisago County has created a boom in retail and service
industry investment both where the new households are located and along the highways
used by those households. This trend is forecast to continue (barring unforeseen long-term
economic downturns) and consequently raises the necessity of setting goals for the preferred
locations, types, and scope of commercial and industrial community development in Scandia.
This section identifies:
• Recent trends in Scandia’s economic base
• Economic assets that could provide focus for community development goals
• Tradeoffs associated with development pattern choices
Employment and Wages
Employment (excluding self-employment)
in Scandia is on the increase. As Figure 10
- Jobs in Scandia 2000 to 2006 indicates, data
from the Quarterly Census of Employment
and Wages (QCEW) shows that the number
of jobs located in Scandia between 2000
and 2006 has increased from 258 in 2001 to
421 in 2006, or 148 jobs (a 54% increase).1
This rate of increase is significantly higher
than most other communities in the area.
The number of businesses with employees,
however, did not increase at the same rate.
Scandia had 63 businesses with employees in
2000, and 84 in 2006, an increase of 33%.
1 QCEW data is compiled from unemployment
insurance filings by businesses, and includes
(statewide) approximately 98 percent of all jobs.
The date exclude self employment and other
job categories not covered by unemployment
insurance.
Figure 10 - Jobs in Scandia 2000 to 2006
Source: QCEW
Current Conditions
Change in Number of Jobs
2000 - 2006
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Year# Employed
Year# Employed
72 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Figure 11 - Change in number of jobs for selected industries in Scandia
Figure 12 - Wages paid in Scandia
A key component of understanding the way that Scandia’s economic base is changing is to
look at how economic sectors are adding jobs or new businesses. Given Scandia’s relatively
small size, the QCEW data on different economic sectors are not complete. The State of
Minnesota suppresses data when release of the data would reveal information about a spe-
cific business.
While complete information on employment by industry is suppressed for confidentiality
purposes, the data do show four major economic sectors in Scandia that comprise approxi-
mately 65% of all employment, including:
• Trade, transportation and utilities
• Leisure and hospitality
Change in Total Wages Paid
By Scandia Businesses, 2000 - 2006
$4,000,000
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
$7,000,000
$8,000,000
$9,000,000
$10,000,000
$11,000,000
2000200120022003200420052006YearTotal Wages
Change in Number of Jobs for Selected Industries,
2000 - 2006
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Year# EmployedTrade,
Transportation and
UtilitiesLeisure and
Hospitality
Education
Professional and
Business Services
• Education services
• Professional services
Source: QCEW
Source: QCEW
Figure 11 - Change in number of jobs
for selected industries in Scandia, shows
how the number of jobs in the four
major economic sectors has changed
over the last six years. Leisure and
hospitality services have approxi-
mately doubled in the last six years,
from 58 jobs to 116 jobs. The
number of jobs in trade, transpor-
tation and utilities increased from
36 jobs in 2000 to 69 jobs in 2006.
Professional and business services
increased from employing 10 people
in 2000 to employing 50 people
in 2006. The number of people
employed in education jobs has held
steady, ranging between 42 jobs in
2000 and 36 jobs in 2003.
Current ConditionsEconomic Base and Community Development
Trade, Transportation
and Utilities
Leisure and
Hospitality
Education
Professional and
Business Services
Year# EmployedChange in Number of Jobs for Selected Industries, 2000 - 2006
73Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Looking at the number of jobs tells only part of the story of Scandia’s economic base.
The amount of wages paid by Scandia businesses also sheds light on the kind of economic
growth that is occurring in the City. Total wages paid increased by 53% from 2000 to 2006.
Figure 12 - Wages paid in Scandia, shows the pattern of change in total wages paid. If, how-
ever, wages are adjusted for inflation, the increase is considerably smaller – approximately
31%. The rate of increase is still quite significant, but is also noticeably slower than the rate
of increase in the number of jobs.
The difference in the rate of increase between the number of jobs versus real wages paid
indicates that economic growth may be occurring either at the lower end of the wage scale
or for seasonal businesses. The leisure and hospitality industry was the sector (of the sectors
for which data are available) that showed the largest growth in number of jobs from 2000 to
2006. This industry is typically seasonal and also tends to pay in the lower end of the wage
scale.
Forecasting economic growth for a community economy as small as Scandia is quite difficult
and likely to be inaccurate. A single large employer coming into the City or leaving the City
will dramatically change the result. Washington County does, however, forecast changes in
the number of jobs for transportation planning purposes based on the six Traffic Analysis
Zones (TAZs) in Scandia. Washington County predicts that retail employment will remain
constant in most areas of Scandia. The village and the southwest quadrant are forecast to
lose a few retail employment (two jobs lost in the village and five in the southwest area).
The County forecasts Scandia to gain a total of 222 additional non-retail jobs by 2030(see
Table 26 - Scandia Growth Forecasts, page 92). Non-retail employment is expected to grow
in three of Scandia’s TAZs while the other four TAZs experience no growth. The north-
west quadrant and the southwest quadrant will each gain 50 non-retail jobs. The village
itself is expected to gain 122 non-retail jobs.
In 2000, Scandia’s labor force included 2,050 people. Of these, 2,001 people were employed.
Forty-nine people, or 1.7 % of people 16 or over, were unemployed. In Washington County,
1.9% of people 16 or over were unemployed. In Chisago County, 2.5% of people 16 or
over were unemployed in 2000.
Of Scandia’s workforce in the year 2000, 80.4% commuted to work by driving alone, 12.5%
carpooled, and 6.9% worked at home. The average commute time was 32.7 minutes. In
Washington County, 83.7% of the workforce drove alone to work, 9.4% carpooled and 3.8%
worked at home. The average commute time for Washington County was 24.6 minutes. In
Chisago County, 81% of the workforce drove to work alone, 12.6% carpooled and 4.2%
worked at home. The average commute time was 31.9 minutes.
Current Conditions
Geographic Distribution of Jobs and Economic Forecast
Labor Force Characteristics2
2 All labor force information is from the 2000 U.S. Census.
Economic Base and Community Development
74 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Occupations
The most common occupations in Scandia in 2000 were management, professional and
related occupations. Thirty-six percent (722 individuals) of the employed civilian popula-
tion was involved in these occupations. The next most common occupations were sales and
office occupations, which accounted for 28.5% (570 people) of the employed population.
Only 219 people were involved in service occupations, 10.9% of the employed population.
In Washington County, management, professional and related occupations were also the
most common occupations in 2000, involving 41% of the employed population. The next
most common occupations were sales and office occupations, which involved 28.2% of the
employed population. Service occupations employed 11.6% of employed people.
In Chisago County, management, professional and related occupations were also the most
common occupations in 2000, involving 28.9% of the employed population. The next most
common occupations were sales and office occupations, which involved 25.1% of the em-
ployed population. Service occupations employed 13.8% of employed people.
Industries Employing Residents
In Scandia, the education, health & social services industry employed the greatest number
of residents – 377 people or 18.8% of employed people. The next largest employers of
Scandia residents were manufacturing and construction, which employed 16.2% and 13.4%
of the employed labor force, respectively.
The biggest employer of Washington County workers, the education, heath and social ser-
vices category, accounted for 18.2 % of the employed labor force. The next largest industry
was manufacturing, which provided jobs for 17.6% of the County labor force, followed by
the retail trade, which employed 11.4%.
For Chisago County workers, education, health and social services employed the same por-
tion of employed labor force as manufacturing did – 19.2%. The next largest industry was
the retail trade, employing 11.9% of the employed population.
Self-Employed Workers
Scandia had a smaller proportion of private wage and salary workers than either Washington
or Chisago County in 2000 (see Table 24 - Types of workers). However, Scandia had a notably
higher percentage of self-employed workers – 10.4 % in Scandia as compared to 5% and
6.8% in Washington and Chisago Counties, respectively.
Current Conditions
Scandia
Washington
County
Chisago
County
CLASS OF WORKER #%#%#%
Private wage and salary workers 1,498 74.9 88,283 81.1 16,810 79.7
Government workers 292 14.6 14,950 13.7 2,779 13.2
Self-employed workers in own
not incorporated business
209 10.4 5,461 5 1,441 6.8
Unpaid family workers 2 0.1 128 0.1 54 0.3
Table 24 - Types of workers
Source: U.S. Census 2000
Economic Base and Community Development
75Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Income and Poverty
The median household income in Scandia in 1999 was $68,036. This was higher than the
1999 median household income in Washington County ($66,305) and in Chisago County
($52,012). Figure 13 - Income, shows the income distribution of all three locations in 1999.
Scandia’s population is more skewed towards the high end of the income brackets than
Washington or Chisago County.
Current Conditions
Figure 13 - Income
Household Income in 1999
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Less than
$10,000
$10,000 to
$14,999
$15,000 to
$24,999
$25,000 to
$34,999
$35,000 to
$49,999
$50,000 to
$74,999
$75,000 to
$99,999
$100,000 to
$149,999
$150,000 to
$199,999
$200,000 or
morePercent of the PopulationHousehold Income in 1999
Scandia
Washington
County
Chisago
County
Family Income in 1999
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Less than
$10,000
$10,000 to
$14,999
$15,000 to
$24,999
$25,000 to
$34,999
$35,000 to
$49,999
$50,000 to
$74,999
$75,000 to
$99,999
$100,000 to
$149,999
$150,000 to
$199,999
$200,000 or
morePercent of the PopulationFamily Income
Scandia
Washington
County
Chisago
County
Economic Base and Community Development
76 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Current Conditions
The median family income in Scandia in 1999 was $76,389. In Washington County the me-
dian income was $74,576, and in Chisago County it was $57,335 in 1999. Figure 13 - Income,
shows the family income distribution for Scandia, Washington County and Chisago County.
Scandia and Washington County both have a greater percentage of the population in the
higher income brackets than Chisago County.
In Scandia, 2% of families and 2.3% of individuals were below the poverty line in 1999,
while in Washington County, 2% of families and 2.9% of individuals were below the poverty
line. In Chisago County, 3.2% of families and 5.1% of individuals were below the poverty
line.
One of the most significant factors affecting Scandia’s long term economic growth pros-
pects is the place that Scandia occupies within the immediate economic region. Map 18 - Re-
gional Economy, shows Scandia’s regional context. Scandia is within a few miles of a number
of established communities with significant economic bases of their own. The presence of
these other communities can have a positive or negative effect on the economic sustainabil-
ity of Scandia businesses. Retail businesses that are in or could locate in Scandia would be
competing with retail businesses in surrounding communities. Big box stores, for instance,
generally have a much more significant dampening effect on smaller retail establishments in
neighboring communities than in the community where the big box is located. In contrast,
niche retail or destination service businesses may actually benefit from nearby retail centers,
as people who are already nearby will be more likely to go a little farther to shop at a spe-
cialty store. Two niche clusters in neighboring communities will support one another to an
even greater degree.
In 2006, communities surrounding Scandia had between 59 (Franconia Township) and
11,155 (Stillwater) jobs. As measured by the number of jobs, five communities economically
dominate the immediate area around Scandia: Stillwater, Forest Lake, Chisago City, Hugo,
and Wyoming. Stillwater is by far the largest local economic influence, but the other four
communities also have much more established economic bases than Scandia. Map 18 - Re-
gional Economy, shows the number of local workers per local job (covered employment only)
for each neighboring community.
Furthermore, while Scandia is experiencing fairly rapid increases in employment, the cities of
Forest Lake, Wyoming, and Stillwater had more than twice the number of new jobs created,
and real wages increased at a pace consistent with job creation. All of these neighboring
cities, furthermore, are located along major transportation corridors (Interstate 35, State
Highway 36) and will see continued economic investment simply by virtue of proximity to
these corridors.
Employment in Surrounding Communities
Economic Base and Community Development
77Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Current Conditions
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX GbWX
GbWX
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WI
SCONSINM
I
NNESOTASt Croix RiverANOKA COUNTYWASHINGTON COUNTY)s
)l
GoWX
GcWX
%&c(
!"`$
²(K!¡°³±
Forest
Lake
Green
Lake
Big Marine
Lake
Bald Eagle
Lake
Clear
Lake
St. Croix River-Taylors F
Lake
South Center
Lake
Oneka
Lake
Rice Creek Marsh
Lake
Howard
Lake
South Lindstrom
Lake
South Sunrise Pool
Lake
Big Carnelian
Lake
North Center Lake
Lake
North Sunrise Pool
Lake
Hugo
Scandia
Forest Lake
Grant
Wyoming
Stacy
Lino Lakes
Lindstrom
Marine on St. Croix
Chisago City
Taylors Falls
Shafer
Dellwood
Center City
May Twp
Wyoming Twp Franconia Twp
Chisago Lake Twp
Lent Twp Shafer Twp
Stillwater Twp
Columbus Twp
Linwood Twp
White Bear Twp
City of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 1 2 30.5
Miles
Regional EconomyRegional Economy
Roads
Interstate Highway
US Highway
State Highway
County Highway
Other Roads
Municipal Boundaries
Open Water
Streams
Data Sources:
Metropolitan Council,
MN DNR
May 17, 2008
Stillwater
Stillwater Twp
St. Croix
Lake
St. Croix River-Taylors F
Lake
Big Carnelian
Lake
Local Workers
Per Local Job
3+ Workers per Job
1.5 to 3
0.85 to 1.5
Map 18 - Regional Economy
Economic Base and Community Development
78 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Current Conditions
For comprehensive planning, it is frequently helpful to consider the community’s economic
base as a single entity or process rather than a series of separate businesses. Figure 14 - Com-
munity economy, shows a model of how a local economy works. Dollars flow into the com-
munity, circulate within the community, and escape from the community. Dollars flowing
into the community come from “export” businesses such as manufacturing, agriculture, and
regional service institutions. Those dollars are circulated within the community when resi-
dents and local businesses spend money and pay taxes. The spending allows businesses to
pay wages to local residents, who then buy more local goods and services, so the same dollar
is spent over and over again. Dollars escape from the community when businesses and
residents spend dollars in other communities for goods and services or pay wages to people
who live outside the community.
In reality, the local economy is so intertwined with that of surrounding communities and
the metropolitan area that one cannot expect to quantitatively measure these flows at the
local level, or to economically isolate a community. This model is, however, helpful for
understanding opportunities and limitations of economic development efforts. Given that
perspective, opportunities to enhance the local economic base come in two forms:
• Expanding local “export” businesses and sources of residents’ wages that are outside
the community, and
• Increasing the opportunities for local residents and businesses to spend locally rather
than outside the community
Manufacturing and similar “export” businesses are referred to as basic industries, which ex-
port their products and import dollars into the community. PN Products, a plastic products
manufacturer, is an example of a basic industry. Retail businesses are typically referred to as
“non-basic,” circulating dollars within the community. Scandia has a number of examples of
non-basic businesses that circulate dollars, including hair salons, a small grocery, gas stations,
and convenience stores. Local government and school employment is also considered to be
a circulating, rather than export, industry.
Dynamics of the Local Economy
Figure 14 - Community economy
Economic Base and Community Development
79Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Existing Businesses in Scandia
Abrahamson Nurseries Peterson Excavating
Am-Tec Designs PN Products
C & B Excavating Prairie Restorations
Cheri Cunningham Graphic Design Prospects Restaurant
Countryside Arts R & B Auto
Crabtree's Country Store Scandia Café
Critical Connections Ecological Services, Inc.Scandia Creamery
Four Seasons Energy Efficient Roofing, Inc Scandia Elementary School
Gilbertson Farms Scandia Family Dental
Greystone Educational Materials Scandia Financial Services
Health Insurance Mart Scandia Hair Design
Ironwood Golf Range Scandia Heating & Air
Kendrick Chiropractic Scandia Olde Towne Liquors
Lakehomes Realty Scandia Pizza
Lakes Air Heating and Cooling Scandia Self Storage
Landmark Surveying Scandia Store
Leroux’s All Season Lawn & Sports Scandia Veterinary Clinic
Lindal Cedar Homes and Sunrooms Security State Bank
Markgraf Mechanical, Inc.Superior Land Preservation
Martin Appraisals Todd’s Home Center
Meister’s Bar and Grill Waland Excavation
Northland Chiropractic Clinic Wilkerson Accounting
Figure 15 - Scandia business inventory
Source: City of Scandia
one manufacturing busi-
ness (PN Products) that
is a significant employer.
An inventory of Scandia
businesses is provided
below in Figure 15 -
Scandia business inventory.
Goods and Services
For one key economic sector in Scandia, however, the traditional assumption about retail/
service as non-basic must be re-examined. Scandia has a number of businesses in the leisure
and hospitality sector that complement the natural resource and tourism assets in the com-
munity. The St. Croix (Highway 95) scenic byway, William O’Brien State Park, Big Marine
Lake, and the Scandinavian tourism institutions in the village area (Gammelgården Museum)
bring people into the community from other places, and thus help support retail and service
businesses that have a basic, rather than non-basic, economic function. Other examples of
retail businesses that have a basic function include niche or specialty retail businesses.
Total employment within QCEW data is separated into two broad categories – goods-
producing and service-providing. Goods-producing economic sectors include all kinds of
manufacturing and related businesses that produce a tangible product for sale (other than ag-
riculture, which is not included in QCEW data), and the construction industry. Service-pro-
viding economic sectors include all other businesses, which include education, retail, health
care, professional services, governmental employment, and other service industry sectors.
Unfortunately, given Scandia’s relatively small economic base this data was suppressed for
confidentiality reasons. Scandia has a very small number of goods-producing industries, and
Current ConditionsEconomic Base and Community Development
80 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
While the goods/services data are not available for Scandia, it is helpful to examine Scandia’s
potential within the regional economy. Goods-producing and service-providing job data for
2006 was available for the six largest communities immediately surrounding Scandia: For-
est Lake, Chisago City, Wyoming, Hugo, Stillwater, and Lindstrom. Figure 16 - Employment
in goods-producing and service providing sectors, shows the number of people employed in goods
versus services in these six communities. Four of these communities have predominantly
service-providing jobs. Stillwater has 1,138 goods production jobs, but 10,017 service pro-
viding jobs. Forest Lake has 539 jobs in goods but 5,460 service industry jobs. Chisago City
has 101 goods production jobs and 1,916 service industry jobs. Lindstrom has almost one
thousand service jobs to 280 good-producing jobs. The two other communities have a more
balanced economic base. Wyoming is more evenly split with 751 goods production jobs
and 1,150 service industry jobs. Hugo actually has more goods-producing jobs (1,221) than
service jobs (778).
From these data we see that the immediate regional economy (Scandia and surrounding
communities) has a higher percentage of service jobs than seen for the metropolitan area or
for the State of Minnesota as a whole. These data demonstrate that Scandia is surrounded
by fairly substantial (and growing) retail/service centers.
Community Development Issues and Land Use
Managing commercial areas
One of the community development issues facing communities in the comprehensive plan-
ning process is how to manage the location and amount of commercial land uses within
the City. Several considerations are important when identifying commercial development
priorities. First, a community needs to manage commercial land use decisions similarly to
how a business manages inventory – finding a balance between meeting market demands
while avoiding unproductive investment in unused inventory. Second, commercial busi-
Figure 16 - Employment in goods-producing and service providing sectors
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
# EmployedForest
Lake
Chisago
City
Wyoming Hugo Lindstrom Stillwater
Number Employed, Goods-Producing and Service-
Providing Sectors, 2006
Goods-Producing Service-Providing
Source: QCEW
Current ConditionsEconomic Base and Community Development
81Scandia Comprehensive Plan
nesses generally work best in clusters, when synergies between businesses can be utilized to
increase both the market share of the businesses and increase the size of the market to be
tapped. Third, commercial businesses should be located to be able to build upon commu-
nity assets and institutions. Natural resources that attract visitors, institutions that increase
traffic, and high-volume highways that carry people through the community are all potential
assets around which commercial investment has a better chance of sustaining itself over the
long run.
Scandia needs to identify:
• Where are community assets that can support commercial investment?
• What is the appropriate amount of commercial land given the local and regional,
and metropolitan context of the City?
• Where are the existing commercial clusters within the community that can provide
opportunities for new investment?
Enhancing quality of life
Another community development issue is describing how economic activity in a community
should enhance the quality of life for residents. Investment in industrial, commercial, agri-
cultural, and other non-residential land uses should make the community better off.
Quality of life issues to consider include:
• Increasing economic opportunity for residents through job creation
• Improving the access that residents and visitors have to essential goods and services
• Increasing the diversity of (non-essential) goods and services for residents and
visitors
• Maintaining the character of residential and rural areas in economic development
decisions
Scandia needs to identify what quality of life issues are priorities in setting economic devel-
opment goals and making community development land use choices. Does the community
want to create local access to essential goods and services? If so, what are the characteristics
of businesses that serve primarily local residents, and the land use patterns that support such
a goal? Does the community want to move toward being a job generator and away from
being a bedroom community? If so, what are the kinds of commercial or industrial invest-
ment that would be economically sustainable in Scandia, and consistent with maintaining the
character of Scandia as a community?
Sustaining community services
Non-residential development (commercial, industrial, agricultural) typically generates more
tax and fee revenue, and demands fewer services, than nearly all types of residential devel-
opment. The pattern of land use and development will, furthermore, have an effect on the
costs of providing the kind of services for which cities are responsible – supporting and
maintaining infrastructure, emergency services, community institutions.
The City should consider:
• What kind of services should be provided by Scandia, and what can be provided in
adjacent communities or in conjunction with adjacent communities?
Current ConditionsEconomic Base and Community Development
82 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
• What amount of non-residential development is appropriate for the community
from both a fiscal and a character perspective?
• Where should commercial and industrial development be located in order to most
efficiently provide services?
Creating new value for priority areas and assets
Strategic commercial investment will add value to non-economic assets in the community,
including places that are endowed with the community character (such as historic buildings),
neighborhoods that can benefit from walkable access to commercial goods or services, and
even natural resources such as scenic vistas that can be connected to economic investment in
order to ensure long-term maintenance. Risks are also present in regard to economic devel-
opment decisions – community character, community assets, and natural resources are put at
risk by nuisances associated with some types of commercial or industrial development.
The City should consider:
• How to add value to neighborhoods or priority character areas by encouraging ap-
propriate commercial investment.
• Whether to link commercial investment to desirable natural resources (shoreland
areas, scenic vistas), and if so, how to ensure long-term maintenance of the natural
resources.
• The potential nuisances associated with commercial land uses (increased traffic,
noise, visual impacts), and the priorities that need to be set to guide future land use
decisions.
Current ConditionsEconomic Base and Community Development
83Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Parks and Recreation
Future land use and development decisions need to consider the necessary infrastructure
that will enable growth, protect community character and natural systems, and sustain Scan-
dia as a community over time. Parks and recreation amenities and programs are a critical
element to sustaining the community. Park, recreation, and open space goals need to be
integrated with Scandia’s land use, transportation, and economic goals. This section sum-
marizes the findings and recommendations of the Parks, Trails, Open Space, and Recreation
Plan and the regional park and recreation needs identified by the Metropolitan Council.
Green Infrastructure
Green infrastructure refers generally to
those systems that allow for and sustain
growth within the community, and im-
prove the quality of life for existing and
future residents. Green infrastructure
is typically based on natural systems
rather than the constructed systems that
comprise “grey infrastructure” – roads,
water and wastewater, energy and tele-
communications, and other engineered
systems. Green infrastructure includes
some constructed infrastructure that is
based on or works with natural systems,
such as active recreation parks, trails, and
works in conjunction with some built sys-
tems, such as stormwater management
and conveyance systems that supple-
ment the natural stormwater system.
The 2006 Parks, Trails, Open Space, and Recreation Plan
In 2006 New Scandia Township completed
and adopted the Parks, Trails, Open Space
and Recreation Plan. This document de-
scribes the current state of, and recom-
mended improvements for, the City’s existing
“green infrastructure.” The Plan includes
a detailed inventory of existing green
infrastructure, summaries of public and
stakeholder priorities that affect the City’s
investments in and maintenance of its green
infrastructure, planning priorities for meeting
current and future park and recreation needs,
and recommendations for specific parks,
trails, and land acquisition to address existing
needs or shortfalls.
Stakeholder Perceptions
The resident survey (conducted in 2004) and
the visioning discussion conducted with City
officials and other stakeholders (also in 2004)
illustrate the perceived needs and priori-
ties for parks, recreation, trails, and open spaces. The resident survey showed an extremely
strong interest in protecting the City’s open space amenities, which include both the natural
systems portrayed on the Open Space Plan map and the rural character associated with ag-
riculture. Residents reported greater participation in individual recreation activities (jogging,
biking, fishing) than team or organized activities. The Plan did not report, however, any
distinction between adult and youth preferences.
The visioning discussion addressed how the different components of Scandia’s green infra-
structure interrelate. The visioning process included an identification of issues, listing of
opportunities, and a number of recommendations. The recommendations for each section
of the Plan are summarized on the following page (see Figure 17 - Parks, Trails, Open Space,
and Recreation Recommendations).
Current Conditions
84 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Park, Trail, Open Space, and Recreation Plan Maps
The Plan includes separate sections for parks, trails, open space, and recreation. The issues
and recommended actions are identified on a series of four maps that describe search areas
for new acquisition or improvements, issues for future planning, and inventories of existing
facilities.
Parks, Trails, Open Space, and Recreation
Visioning Session Recommendations
Park System Plan
1. Focal point of Scandia Community Center Park as central hub of parks network throughout
Township.
2. Consider land acquisition to the south of Community Center to enlarge park and preserve area
of high ecological value.
3. Increase active recreation at Scandia Elementary School area.
4. Identify where and what kind of park acquisition is desirable.
5. Identify appropriate use of existing parks.
Trail System Plan
1. Opportunity to revisit Olinda Trail North as part of trail system.
2. Locate connection to Gateway Trail.
3. Locate equestrian trails, other special-interest user group trails.
4. Identify locations for trailheads and rest stops.
Open Space System Plan
1. Locate trails along ecologically-valued areas.
2. Develop conservation easements.
3. Designate some lakes as strictly non-motorized use.
4. Maintain minimum buffer around natural areas if development occurs.
5. Protect stream corridors; link to promote preservation of open space.
6. Develop conservation policies relative to Wind in the Pines Park.
7. Promote public awareness of value of open space.
Recreational Facilities System Plan
1. Develop partnerships with local and regional Recreation Facilities (e.g. adjacent school districts,
and local city governments).
Source: 2006 New Scandia Township Parks, Trails, Open Space, and Recreation Plan
Current Conditions
Figure 17 - Parks, trails, open space, and recreation recommendations
Parks and Recreation
85Scandia Comprehensive Plan
The Parks, Trails, Open Space, and Recreation Plan identifies general criteria that can be
used to identify potential gaps in park and recreation programmatic needs and criteria for
ensuring adequate park infrastructure as the City develops. Most of these criteria are based
on National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) recommendations for the number or
acres of specific facilities based on the population of a city, or a minimum distance to certain
types of facilities.
The NRPA standards are, however, merely a starting point for Scandia. The characteristics
of Scandia’s population (age profile, household types, income levels) and the character of
Scandia’s neighborhoods are considerably different than the typical city envisioned when the
NRPA standards were created. For instance, Scandia is now quite rural compared to most
cities, and will continue to have significant areas of rural character for the next 20 years. The
ideal distance to particular types of facilities (such as ball parks and similar athletic fields)
may be longer for Scandia than a typical city because of the number of low density neigh-
Future Needs
Current Conditions
borhoods removed from
the village area. Similarly,
parks intended to serve a
population within walk-
ing distance, (such as tot
lots or playgrounds) may
serve fewer households
than would otherwise
be ideal for those ar-
eas of Scandia that are
targeted to remain at low
densities. Furthermore,
Scandia could use the
park service area concept
as a minimum geographic
unit within which to
provide a minimum level
of park or recreation
facilities, regardless of
population.
Recreational facilities are
another category typically
evaluated by population
(number of facilities per
1,000 people). Using
the NRPA standards,
the Plan calculated a list
of potential recreational
facilities needs to be con-
sidered as Scandia grows
(see Table 25 - Recom-
mended recreational facilities).Note: Numbers in parentheses represent National, State or private facilities.
Source: 2006 New Scandia Parks, Trails, Open Space, and Recreation Plan
Table 25 - Recommended recreational facilities
Facility
Existing
Township
Facilities
Existing
School
Facilities
Proposed
Standard
Per 1,000
People
Add.
Needed
Year
2005
Total
Add.
Needed
2005-2020
Archery Range 0 0 1/50,000 0 0
BMX Track 0 0 --- 0 0
Baseball 0 0 1/6,000 0 0
Basketball 1 Hoop 4 Half-
court
1/5,000 0 1
Boat Landing 1 (3) 0 --- 0 0
Canoe Rack 0 0 --- 0 2
Community Facility 1 0 --- 0 0
Disc Golf 0 0 --- 0 1
Ice, Arena- Indoor 0 0 1/15,000 0 0
Ice, Hockey- Outdoor 1 0 1/3,500 0 1
Ice, Pleasure-Outdoor 1 0 1/5,000 0 0
Ice, Warming House 1 0 --- 0 1
Picnic Shelter 1 (1) 0 1/5,000 0 0
Pool- Indoor 0 0 --- 0 0
Pool- Outdoor or
Beach
(1) 0 1/20,000 0 0
Skateboard Park 1 0 --- 0 0
Sliding Hill 0 0 1/15,000 0 0
Softball-Youth 3 (1) 3* 1/1,800 0 0
Softball-Adult 1 0 1/5,000 0 0
Tennis Courts 2 (2) 0 1/3,000 0 0
Volleyball 0 0 1/6,000 0 1
Recommended Recreation Facilities
Parks and Recreation
86 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
The Metropolitan Council created a Regional Parks System Statement for New Scandia
Township in 2005. The System Statement identifies what regional park issues need to be
addressed in the City of Scandia’s comprehensive plan. No new regional parks are planned
in Washington County by 2030, and no recent changes to the existing regional park system
(which could require adjustment of the City’s land use maps) are noted in the System State-
ment.
The System Statement describes the two existing regional parks, Big Marine Park Reserve
and William O’Brien State Park. Other public and private recreational areas are noted in
the System Statement, including local parks and fields, county-owned land, the Falls Creek
Scientific Natural Area, and the planned Glacial Hills Trail at the City’s southeast border with
Maine on St. Croix (see below). The City’s park priorities, identified in the 2006 Compre-
hensive Parks, Trails, Open Space, and Recreation Plan, address Scandia’s regional park assets
and recommend steps to enhance their functional use by managing land use, further devel-
oping City and regional trail systems, and adding new recreational amenities in or near these
regional parks.
The Metropolitan Council’s 2005 Regional Parks Capital Improvement Program identified
several priority acquisitions in 2006-7 to expand Big Marine Park Reserve, and a project
scheduled for 2010-11 to develop a campground and related facilities in Big Marine Park Re-
serve. These investments will likely result in increased use of Big Marine Park Reserve and
will enhance the recreational value of trail connections or other local park and open space
efforts connecting to the Reserve.
While not in Scandia’s System Statement, the Glacial Hills Trail in Marine on St. Croix is
identified as running close to Scandia’s southeast border. The System Statement for Marine
on St. Croix describes the Trail as follows:
Glacial Hills Regional Trail – This proposed regional trail will connect the Cen-
tral Anoka County Regional Trail to the west with Big Marine Park Reserve to east.
The proposed trail is partially located within the City of Marine on St. Croix. This
proposed trail does not have an approved master plan yet. The county will conduct
a master planning process for this trail in the future. The county will include the city
and others in this process. The general alignment of the trail as shown in Figure 2
should be acknowledged in the city’s comprehensive plan.
Although not in Scandia’s System Statement, this proposed regional trail should be consid-
ered as Scandia examines potential trail connections between William O’Brien State Park and
Big Marine Park Reserve (a trails goal described in the City’s Parks, Trails, Open Space and
Recreation Plan).
The proposed Gateway Trail is also not included in Scandia’s System Statement. The trail
ended several miles south of Scandia when the System Statement was completed. A ma-
jor extension of this regional trail is being mapped as this Plan is in process. The trail will
extend into the village area, and ultimately run through Scandia and connect to regional trails
running far north. The Gateway Trail is a major addition to Scandia’s recreation system as
discussed in the 2006 Trails Plan. Map 19 - The Regional Parks System Statement Map, is pro-
vided on the following page.
Metropolitan Council Regional Parks System Statement
Current ConditionsParks and Recreation
87Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Map 19 - The Regional Parks System Statement Map
Source: Metropolitan Council Regional Parks System Statement, July 2005
Current ConditionsParks and Recreation
88 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
The Parks, Trails, Open Space, and Recreation Plan identified a number of priority actions
and investments to meet the Plan’s goals. The following priorities were identified in each
section of the Plan, either in the text or on the Plan map.
Park System Plan, Goal 3, Points 6 and 7:
6. Continue to require that plans for each new residential, commercial, and industrial
subdivision include provisions for the dedication of parks (or cash in lieu of land)
to meet the anticipated recreation demand caused by the development. Periodically
review and update the dedication requirement as necessary.
7. Scandia should consider requiring a reasonable portion of any proposed subdivi-
sion be dedicated to the public, or preserved for public use as parks, playgrounds,
trails or open space, according to Minnesota Statutes 462.358, subdivision 2(b). The
City should review each development proposal individually to determine how it best
accommodates Scandia’s Comprehensive Parks, Trails, Open Space and Recreation
Plan.
Park Search Areas - Park Search Areas are displayed on Map 20 - Park and Recreation
Search Areas.
1. NSPS-A: Located near the Falls Creek SNA and Wind in the Pines Park, acquiring
parkland in this area would serve as a buffer to protect and preserve these public
lands for their scenic and ecological significance.
2. NSPS-B: Located east of the Scandia Fire Hall and Maintenance Building site, this
area may be used for trails, interpretive features and/or new recreation facilities,
including disk golf.
3. NSPS-C: Parkland acquisition in the area south of the Scandia Community/Senior
Center would encourage the preservation of significant open space, which exhibits
high ecological value.
4. NSPS-D: This park search area includes the northwest, northeast and southeast
corners of the intersection of State Highway 97 and Manning Trail.
5. NSPS-E: Park search area five is located between Manning Trail and County Road
1 north of German Lake. Parkland acquisition in this area would serve to preserve
this open space rich in ecological diversity.
Additional Information from Park System Plan Map
• Expansion of William O’Brien State Park
• Expansion of Big Marine Park Reserve
Green Infrastructure Priorities
Park Priorities
Current ConditionsParks and Recreation
89Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Current Conditions
Map 20 - Park and Recreation Search Areas
Parks and Recreation
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Clear Lake
Sylvan Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Park
Search A
Park
Search E
Park
Search C
Park
Search D
Park
Search B
Rec
Search B
Rec
Search C
Rec
Search A
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
2 05th S t N
240th St N
Lofton Ave N185th St N
Mayberry Tr N Nolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N Oli
nda Tr
N177th St N Pil
a
r Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Manning Tr NMelanie Tr N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NQuant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NOakhill Rd N
Old Marine Tr NSai
nt Cr
oi
x
Tr
NSaint Croix Tr NMayber
r
y Tr
NOlinda Tr NOlinda Tr N240 th St N
1 7 7 t h S t N
City of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Park and Recreation Search AreasPark and Recreation Search Areas
City Boundary
Open Water
Streams
County Parkway
County Greenway
Parcels
Parks & Open Space
Search Areas
City Parks
Recreation Facilities
Park Expansions
Gateway Trail
Park Boundaries
Gateway Trail Alignment
Data Sources: MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council,
Washington County
July 2, 2008Derived from City of Scandia Parks, Trails, Open Space and Recreation Plan
90 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Recreation Facility Search Areas - Recreation Facility Search Areas are shown on Map
20 - Park and Recreation Search Areas.
1. NSRS-A: Located directly adjacent to the east side of the Scandia Fire Hall and
Maintenance Building site north of CSAH 97, this site could include trails, interpre-
tive elements and explore the feasibility of implementing a disc golf course.
2. NSRS-B: Located just west of the Scandia Elementary School, this site is identified
as an expansion of the school’s current facilities in partnership with the City.
3. NSRS-C: The intersection of State Highway 97 and County Road 15/Man-
ning Trail could be considered for potential acquisition toward recreation facility
improvements.
Additional Information from Recreation Facilities Plan Map
Proposed Fishing Piers
Bone Lake Park
Big Marine Lake
Goose Lake
Proposed Canoe Racks
Goose Lake
Log House Boat Landing at Copas
Other recreation recommendations
Explore the potential of implementing disk golf as an appropriate fit to the recre-
ation needs of Scandia residents. Disk golf is considered one of the fastest-grow-
ing sports in Minnesota.
Provide trails to all City recreational facilities.
Improve existing and create new lake access points.
Overall Trail System Plan
Create a trail system to provide recreation opportunities for Scandia residents and visitors,
and establish trails links to the village center, parks, neighborhoods and the Scandia Elemen-
tary School.
Trail System Specifics (Goals 5, 6 and 7):
Goal 5: The City supports the establishment of a public, multi-use, non-motorized trail such
as the Gateway Trail Extension or other trails that the City might establish on its own as part
of a program of providing outdoor recreational amenities and community-wide trail linkages
that serve the health and welfare of the City’s residents. The Gateway Trail Extension is
planned to connect the Gateway Trail at Pine Point Park to Taylors Falls. The exact location
will be determined by willing landowners and the opportunity to use park and trail dedica-
Recreation Facility Priorities
Trail System Priorities
Current ConditionsParks and Recreation
91Scandia Comprehensive Plan
tions as part of new developments. A formal route extending into the village area is being
mapped as this Plan is in process.
Goal 6: Identify a search area for a trail connection between William O’Brien State Park and
Big Marine Park Reserve.
Goal 7: Consider potential non-motorized trail connection when/if the abandoned Soo Line
railway corridor from White Bear Lake to Wisconsin through Scandia becomes available.
Additional Information from Trails Plan Map
Proposed City Trailheads (from Trails Plan Map)
Wind in the Pines Park
Lion’s Park at Hay Lake
Scandia Community/Senior Center
Intersection of Oak Hill Rd. N and State Hwy 95
Big Lake School Area
Conceptual Open Space Corridor Plan
The objective of the Open Space Plan in the Parks, Trails, Open Space and Recreation Plan
is to identify green corridors that preserve and enhance important open space. These green
corridors would link fragmented open space and promote trail and wildlife corridors, respec-
tively, while preserving the rural character of the community. Scandia should use this plan as
a general guide to work with the public to promote green corridors and ensure that they are
preserved or enhanced as development occurs. These proposed corridors do not necessarily
reflect public acquisition of land; the vast majority of this land would likely remain private.
The Open Space Plan Map also includes rare natural features of a variety of types. They are
largely located along the St. Croix River, although a few are scattered throughout the rest of
the township, particularly near Big Marine Lake.
Open Space Priorities
Current ConditionsParks and Recreation
92 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Transportation System
Growth Forecasts and Transportation Planning
Transportation planning includes forecasting the impact of growth on transportation sys-
tems. The Metropolitan Council does this by using a regional travel demand model, which is
a representation of reality based on assumptions about future growth, future transportation
system improvements, transportation costs, and travel behavior patterns. The region is bro-
ken into geographic units of analysis called transportation analysis zones (TAZs). Ordinari-
ly, communities are required to consider the distribution of forecasted growth by TAZ. This
is important because growth in different parts of a community will affect roadways differ-
ently. However, because of its generally dispersed rural nature, the regional travel demand
model only includes one TAZ for Scandia. Met Council growth forecasts for the entire City
of Scandia are indicated in Table 26 - Scandia growth forecasts.
Washington County is also conducting travel demand modeling of its own. Map 12 - House-
hold Change by TAZ (on page 45), shows the distribution of household growth assumed for
each TAZ by the Washington County travel demand model. Because of the way it is con-
structing the model, it provides an opportunity to look at Scandia’s conditions more closely.
Map 12 - Household Change by TAZ, illustrates that the model includes seven TAZs for Scan-
dia, including one that encompasses the Village Center. By anticipating where growth might
occur, it provides transportation planners an opportunity to look at how growth will affect
particular segments of roadways differently.
Current Conditions
Table 26 - Scandia growth forecasts
Population
2000 2010 2020 2030
3,692 4,370 5,000 5,400
Households
2000 2010 2020 2030
1,294 1,590 1,890 2,100
Total Employment
2000 2010 2020 2030
272 420 520 610
Retail Employment
2000 2010 2020 2030
70 70 80 80
Non-Retail Employment
2000 2010 2020 2030
202 350 440 530
Source: Metropolitan Council;
Washington County
The Washington County base model, the results of
which are shown in Map 24 – Forecasted Traffic Volumes
for Washington County: 2030, incorporates future road-
way improvements throughout the county based on
anticipated funding availability. Washington County
has also conducted transportation modeling for five
other scenarios, two of which had implications for
Scandia. One scenario looked at the impact of not
replacing the Stillwater Bridge. According to the
model, this would result in greater traffic volumes
on TH 95/St. Croix Trail, as increasing demand to
cross the river seeks out alternate routes. Under
this scenario, the segment of TH 95 just south of
Chisago County is forecasted to have 11,100 vehicles
per day in 2030, as opposed to 8,200 under base
model assumptions. Another scenario involved look-
ing at the impacts of improvements to Highway 36,
Interstate 94 and Interstate 494. Traffic forecasts in
Scandia also increase under this scenario, but are less
pronounced (9,200 vehicles on the segment of TH 95
mentioned above). The reasons are less obvious, but
improvements to principal arterials will involve shift-
ing of traffic toward this network of facilities as they
become more attractive.
93Scandia Comprehensive Plan
The Met Council requires community comprehensive plans to include existing and future
traffic forecasts on Principal Arterials and A-Minor Arterials. Rural communities can apply
trend growth factors to traffic forecasts, but Washington County’s travel demand model
includes forecasts for these roadways as well as other significant roadways. Results from
the Washington County transportation demand model are similar to historical annual traffic
volume growth rates, which generally range from 2 to 4 percent for Scandia.
The capacity of roadways relates primarily to the number of travel lanes and posted speed,
but other factors affect flow as well as efficiency and safety. These include the number of
potential conflict points, including intersections and driveways. Level of Service, or LOS,
is a term used to grade how freely traffic flows on a roadway during peak periods. These
grades range from LOS A (unobstructed, freely flowing conditions) to LOS F (long delays
and heavy congestion). LOS D (heavy, but stable flow) is the effective capacity of the road-
way. For planning purposes, Mn/DOT considers roadways with LOS D as an acceptable
level of traffic, but roadways with LOS E as those that will eventually require improvements
in terms of safety, efficiency and capacity (e.g., greater limitations on intersections/drive-
ways, addition of turning/passing lane, or addition of travel lane, etc.).
Generally speaking, two-lane minor arterial roadways have an effective daily capacity (LOS
D) of 10,300 vehicles per day3. The addition of a continuous center turn lane (3-lane road-
way), which improves traffic flow, provides a daily capacity of 14,800. As indicated in Map
21 - Existing Traffic Volumes for Scandia, only a few segments of TH 97/ Scandia Trail in the
city are approaching these capacity limitations. The addition of turning lanes and passing
lane segments has improved their effective capacity and functioning. Traffic volumes in-
crease on Scandia Trail heading west toward Forest Lake. As indicated in Map 22 - Forecasted
Traffic Volumes, the highest forecasted volume for 2030 is 15,100 just west of CSAH 15/
Manning Trail (currently 10,600). While Mn/DOT identifies a need for eventual expansion
of this roadway as part of the Transportation System Plan, it is not a priority corridor and it
is part of a long list of unfunded needs through 2030.
Map 23 - Existing Traffic Volume for Washington County and Map 24 - Forecasted Traffic Volume for
Washington County 2030, allow comparison of Scandia’s traffic volumes to those of surround-
ing communities. While a few communities have lower traffic volumes, many have much
more traffic than Scandia.
Traffic Forecasts and Roadway Capacity
Current ConditionsTransportation System
3TH 97 and Surrounding Area Study, October 2002.
94 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Map 21 - Existing Traffic Volumes for Scandia
Map 22 - Forecasted Traffic Volumes : 2030 Draft for Scandia
Source: Washington County
Source: Washington County
Current ConditionsTransportation System
95Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Map 23 - Existing Traffic Volumes for Washington County
Current ConditionsTransportation System
Source: Washington County
96 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Current ConditionsTransportation System
Source: Washington County
2030 Base Model, Assumed MN/DOT Improvements
Includes New
St. Croix River
Crossing
10- Lane
Wakota
Bridge
I-694, I-35E
to TH 36
Add Lanes
Expand
Hastings
Bridge to
4 Lanes
TH 36-
McKnight
Interchange
Map 24 - Forecasted Traffic Volumes for Washington County : 2030
97Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Roadway Functional Classification in Scandia is shown on Map 25 - Roadway Functional
Classification. Scandia’s comprehensive plan must map at least those roadways that have a
functional classification of Principal Arterial (e.g., Interstate Highway) or A-Minor Arterial
(e.g., State Trunk Highway), including the number of existing and future lanes. These are
the region’s most important roadways in terms of mobility over longer distances. They are
characterized by their length, directness and traffic volume; and they are typically designed to
limit interference in the flow of traffic. In Scandia, these roadways are limited to the follow-
ing state and county roads, all of which are two-lane undivided facilities. Scandia Trail was
recently repaved with turning/passing lanes. No lane additions to any of these roads are
funded through 2030.
A-Minor Arterials
• TH 97/Scandia Trail
• TH 95/St. Croix Trail
• CSAH 3/Olinda Trail
• CSAH 15/Manning Trail (south of TH 97)
It is important to note that Washington County identifies a potential future north/south
principal arterial corridor that extends from one end of the county to the other. This cor-
ridor begins as County Road 15A in Scandia, continues as CSAH 15 south of Scandia Trail,
and includes TH 95 south of Interstate 94. Forecasted traffic volumes for this corridor
are considerably greater in the central portion of the county, so it is unclear when, if ever,
the portion of the corridor in Scandia would become a principal arterial. It is also unclear
how such a corridor would interconnect with the system in Chisago County. Nevertheless,
Washington County will wish to preserve adequate rights-of-way where there are potential
roadway expansions, particularly south of Scandia Trail.
Principal and Minor Arterials are complemented by Collector roadways, often under the
jurisdiction of the County in rural areas. Scandia has also identified a set of local collectors
that connect small residential enclaves and neighborhoods. As the name suggests, the pur-
pose of these roadways is to collect traffic from a broader system of local roads and “de-
liver” it to a limited number of intersections with arterials. A system of collector streets and
local roads is important in preserving the mobility function of regional roadways while also
providing an alternative, and often more direct, means of circulating through the community.
Major Collector
• CSAH 1/Lofton Avenue
Minor Collectors
• CR 15A/Manning Trail (north of TH 97)
• CR 52/Oakhill Road (south of TH 97)
• Keystone Ave. N. / 192nd St. N.
Roadway Functional Classification
Current ConditionsTransportation System
98 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Current Conditions
Map 25 - Roadway Functional Classification
Transportation System
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
Sø³A
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverBig Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lofton Ave N185th St N
Mayberry Tr N Nolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N Oli
nda Tr
N177th St N Pil
ar Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Manning Tr NMelanie Tr N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Ostrum Tr NKeystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NOlinda Tr NOakhill Rd N
Old Marine Tr NSai
nt Cr
oi
x
Tr
N1 7 7 t h S t NMayber
r
y Tr
NSaint Croix Tr NOlinda Tr N240 th St N
Manning Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Roadway Functional ClassificationRoadway Functional Classification
Functional Class
A Minor Arterial
B Minor Arterial
Major Collector
Minor Collector
City Road
City Boundary
Open Water
Streams
Data Sources:
Metropolitan Council,
MN DNR
October 20, 2008
Roadway Jurisdiction
?öA@ State Highway
S°County Road
GoWX County State Aid
Highway
99Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Given the primarily low-density rural nature of Scandia, the network of minor arterial and
collector roadways should be sufficient. However, as the community experiences moderate
growth, it will be important to identify potential new links. Land subdivision and site plan
reviews should ensure that these missing links between local roadway segments are eventu-
ally dedicated to form an interconnected rural street system.
Factors to consider in identifying new roadway segments include the following:
• Rural topography, wetlands and other natural features
• Continuity of roadway alignment
• Land use and zoning
• Market interest, parcel configuration and anticipated build-out conditions
Notwithstanding a more extensive analysis of environmental and ownership conditions,
examples of potential new local streets include the following:
• Meadowbrook Road extension between Oakhill Road and 218th Street, which provides a
missing link in a direct connection to TH 97/Scandia Trail
• Link between 209th Street/Quality Trail, which provides a connection toward the Vil-
lage Center
• Ozark Avenue N. southward from 209th to Oxboro Avenue N., which provides more
direct fire and emergency service response to points south and which provides an alter-
native to traveling on TH 97/Scandia Trail
A common problem in developing rural areas is how to address the development of local
streets in the absence of a more detailed local street plan. The risks of a poorly planned
and developed street system includes landlocked parcels, increased needs for direct access
onto arterial roads, parcels that require circuitous access, and/or parcels that have only one
ingress/egress point (e.g., long dead-end streets). Like other communities, Scandia requires
that subdivisions consider the interconnection of new local streets with future subdivisions
and with access management guidelines of the County and State.
One major concern among communities is the creation of long dead-end streets that be-
come de facto cul-de-sacs. Although Scandia does not currently have a maximum dead-end
street length, many communities do. Stearns County recently surveyed members of the
Minnesota Chapter of the American Planning Association with regard to this issue. This
information is available in a separate document. This is a largely contextual issue that may
be best addressed by engaging adjoining property owners in areas experiencing development
interest.
Identifying new local street alignments is particularly important in and around the Village
Center area, an area that includes a mixture of zoning that includes Retail Business (RB),
General Business (GB) and higher density Single Family Estate (SFE). Much of this area to
the east of Oakhill Road has no direct access to Oakhill Road or the historic Scandia Village
Center. Employees, visitors and residents of this area must walk or drive a circuitous route
that includes Ozark, Scandia Trail, Olinda Trail and Oakhill Road.
Citywide Future Local Roadways and Functional Role
Current ConditionsTransportation System
Village Center Streets
100 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Providing new Village Center connections will increase the vitality, walkability and acces-
sibility of the area. It will also establish a framework for future development and avoid
overreliance on the Scandia Trail/Olinda Trail intersection. In conjunction with the even-
tual southward expansion of Ozark, two main options should be explored, which begin to
interconnect local streets and form a finer-grained network in the heart of the community:
Village Center Connection Options:
• Provide a non-motorized extension of Ozark Court North to Olinda Trail, which pro-
vides the shortest and most logical connection between the new business district and the
Village Center
• Connect 209th Street North from Ozark to its alignment between Olinda and Oakhill
Limiting the number of intersections and driveways is important to maintaining mobility
and safe operations on roadway that are intended to carry traffic longer distances at higher
speeds. Driveways and public streets connecting with TH 97/Scandia Trail and TH 95/St.
Croix Trail are subject to Mn/DOT Access Management guidelines. Roadways under the
jurisdiction of Washington County must meet County access spacing guidelines for connect-
ing driveways and public streets.
Mn/DOT Access Management guidelines are based on the type of roadway (A-Minor Ar-
terials in this case) and the land use and surrounding development patterns. TH 97/Scandia
Trail is classified as Category 5B (Minor Arterial-Urban/Urbanizing) because of the City’s
Diversified Rural designation by the Metropolitan Council. TH 95/St. Croix Trail is Catego-
ry 5A (Minor Arterial-Rural, Exurban, Bypass). Recommended intersection spacing on TH
97 is one-quarter mile, while recommended spacing is one-half mile on TH 95. Exceptions
are made in cases where environmental and topographic conditions prevent such spacing,
and where access to property is not otherwise available.
Washington County access spacing guidelines are also based on the type of roadway. Princi-
pal Arterials limit direct access for driveways and require one-half mile spacing for intersect-
ing Local Streets (continuous), Collector Streets, and Minor Arterials. Spacing guidelines
for Minor Arterials are based on the average daily trips on the roadway and range from
one-eighth to one-half mile with private driveway spacing determined by other criteria such
as sight distance, speed, traffic volume, etc. Collector and Local Streets have similar spacing
requirements as Minor Arterials with no distinction based on average daily trips.
Land use planning and subdivision regulation are the responsibilities of the City. In con-
junction with local land planning, Scandia should ensure that land subdivision does not
preclude the development of a local road network that reduces the need for individual drive-
ways onto these and other minor arterials. The Metropolitan Council requires that Scandia
address policies and efforts to this effect. One option is for Scandia to state an intention to
create backage roads (rather than frontage roads), which is one way to provide access to par-
cels that would otherwise have access onto the arterial. This is one way that rural character
along these roads can be maintained.
Access Management
Current ConditionsTransportation System
101Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Transit
Scandia is in Transit Market IV Area, where transit service is limited and not cost-effective
due to low rural and agricultural densities. Services characteristic to these areas can include
dial-a-ride, volunteer driver and ridesharing programs. In the case of rural Washington
County, including Scandia, dial-a-ride service is provided by Human Services, Inc., which
operates HSI Transporter.
Nearby Forest Lake, however, is a freestanding Transit Market III Area, as identified in the
Metropolitan Council’s 2030 Transportation Policy Plan. This identifies areas which gener-
ally support peak-oriented commuter transit service. However, it does not currently have
regular route transit service as it is not part of the metropolitan transit taxing district. It is,
however, identified as a future area of expansion, which would create additional revenue for
expanded service.
In anticipation of potential transit service, Washington County has created a transit center
as part of its new government service center at Forest Road and Fitzgerald Tr. N. As of
January 7th, 2008, Metropolitan Council initiated Route 288, a one-year demonstration route
between the Forest Lake Transit Center and downtown Minneapolis. These changes also
include the new Running Acres Park-and-Ride at Lake Drive and Zurich Street in Columbus
that opened in May 2008. This is being done to provide relief at the crowded 95th Avenue
Park-and-Ride in Blaine and is part of efforts to mitigate the impacts of the I-35W bridge
collapse. Scandia residents have access to this facility, which includes 309 spaces that can
also be used in the interim for carpoolers.
The Metropolitan Council’s 2030 Transportation Policy Plan identifies the Rush Line along
the I-35/US 61 Corridor as a future transitway. It is also identified as a Tier II corridor as
part of Mn/DOT’s commuter rail system plan. The Rush Line Corridor Task Force, which
is studying transit options and building support for transit in the corridor, has completed
a study of commuter coach bus service between a Park-and-Ride in Lent Township and
downtown St. Paul. It would stop at the Forest Lake Transit Center en route to downtown
St. Paul.
Hiking and bicycling trails are specifically addressed in the Parks and Open Space Plan.
Given the low volume of traffic, long distances, and rural density, biking and walking are
primarily recreational and reasonably accommodated by paved shoulders on arterials and col-
lector streets. However, there will be greater demand for walking and biking to and around
the Village Center. A principal strategy to accommodate or encourage walking and bicycling
to the Village Center would be to ensure interconnected streets and to provide sidewalks and
bicycle racks.
The only air traffic consideration for Scandia is the designation of Big Marine Lake as a
permitted seaplane lake. Seaplane traffic on Big Marine Lake must comply with Minne-
sota aeronautics rules and regulations for permitted seaplane lakes. There are no airports
within Scandia nor is the city within any “influence area” of any existing or planned airport.
Bicycling and Walking
Current ConditionsTransportation System
Airports
102 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Current Conditions
Therefore, regulations regarding land use and height do not apply. The nearest airport is the
special purpose airport in Forest Lake. However, the Metropolitan Council’s Transportation
Policy Plan reflects Federal Regulation Title 14, Part 77 which establishes standards and noti-
fication requirements for objects affecting navigable airspace. All municipalities must protect
airspace from potential electronic interference and obstructions to air navigation. As proof
that they have done so, they must include a policy and text regarding their notification to the
Federal Aviation Agency. To notify the Federal Aviation Agency, municipalities must submit
Form 7460. They must also demonstrate that they have adopted local codes and ordinances
for control of objects affecting navigable airspace, including construction exceeding 200 feet
above ground level at certain distances from aviation facilities.
Transportation System
103Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use Areas
A primary outcome of the comprehensive land use planning process is the identification
of future land use areas. Future land use areas are geographically defined areas of the city.
Each future land use area is distinct in its desired land use pattern, anticipated land uses, and
character. The vision for the City of Scandia contains the guiding principles for defining
future land use areas. The vision is reflected in the future land use areas by:
• Emphasizing the protection of natural resources that define Scandia’s character, econo-
my, and quality of life
• Retaining the integrity of the village center as the commercial core surrounded by small-
town neighborhoods
• Ensuring the continuation of a thriving agriculture economy in the City
• Supporting the traditional development around our lakes and rivers and protecting water
quality as future development occurs
• Allowing a variety of rural residential development outside of the agricultural core area
and village center
The future land use areas allow a variety of densities and land uses. Overall, the densities in
the future land use areas meet the Metropolitan Council’s guidance for Scandia as a desig-
nated “diversified rural” planning area. Diversified rural areas allow for densities averaging
1 housing unit per 10 acres made up of a mix of low-density agricultural areas, large-lot
residential development, clustered housing, and other rural uses.
Future land use areas are not zoning districts. The comprehensive plan vision looks twenty
years into the future. Zoning is on the ground today. Future land use areas reflect the vi-
sion time horizon. The vision will be implemented over the next twenty years; not all at
once in the next few years. Over the next twenty years, the City of Scandia desires the land
use pattern, uses, and character of each of the future land use areas to transition from the
current pattern, uses, and character. In some cases there are few barriers to this transition,
or it is not a transition at all since the desired future is maintaining the status quo. In other
cases, a transition from current patterns to other distinct patterns is described. And finally,
in a few cases significant effort will have to be undertaken to achieve the desired future land
use. Zoning is one of many implementation tools for the comprehensive plan. The future
land use areas will influence some zoning changes in the near future and others in the longer
term.
The following sections describe future land use areas for the City of Scandia and include:
• A description of the general character of the future land use area
• Primary and secondary land uses
• Desired densities and lot sizes
• Standards for design or character that apply to the specific area
Future Land Use Areas and Map
Introduction
104 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use Areas
The geographic boundaries of the future land use areas are shown on two maps. The first,
Map 26 - Future Land Use Areas with Natural Resource Overlay, shows the natural resource
protection areas on top of all of the future land use areas except the lakeshore areas. The
second, Map 27 - Future Land Use Areas, shows the future land use areas, including lakeshore
areas, without the natural resource protection areas overlay.
Natural Resource Protection Areas
Through extensive discussion and mapping, priority natural resource areas have been
identified throughout Scandia. Natural Resource Protection Areas will be located wherever
priority natural resource areas occur, for example, wetlands, steep slopes, shoreland areas,
high-quality natural areas, etc. Appendix A, Natural Resource Priority Area Mapping, includes
a detailed description of the scientific data layers and methodology used to identify priority
natural resource areas in Scandia.
Transfer of Development Rights
The concept of Transfer of Development
Rights (TDR) is mentioned in connection
with several future land use areas (natural re-
source protection areas, village neighborhood
area, agricultural core area and general rural
areas). TDR will be considered by the City
of Scandia as a means for compensating land-
owners who are asked to give up development
rights in order to meet community goals. The
City of Scandia will establish a study commit-
tee to evaluate the use of TDR for achieving
agricultural preservation, natural resource pro-
tection, and life-cycle and affordable housing
goals. The study committee will report their
conclusions to the City Council within one
year after adoption of the comprehensive plan.
In a TDR program landowners or develop-
ers have the ability to transfer the right to
develop from one site (the “sending” site) to
another site (the “receiving” site). The pro-
gram can be used to move the “development
right” within a single proposed development,
or from one site to another completely dif-
ferent site. The program can be entirely
voluntary, it can include incentives, or it can
include regulatory elements. The “sending”
site is permanently protected with a conser-
vation easement which is a voluntary, nego-
tiated agreement between a landowner and
a non-profit or agency to permanently limit
the use of land because of its resource value.
The Natural Resource Protection Areas will function
as an overlay. An overlay “lays over” underlying future
land use areas. In overlay areas, increased consider-
ation of natural resources is required in addition to
the requirements of the underlying land use area. The
underlying land use area determines the character, land
uses, and densities of the area. Development will not be
prohibited in Natural Resource Protection Areas, but the
location of structures and other sites design decisions
will be influenced by the presence of natural resources.
Minimum protection standards will be established for
priority natural resources. Scandia will use performance
standards and/or site design standards to regulate how
development occurs within Natural Resource Protection
Areas. A variety of specific techniques will be consid-
ered including open space conservation subdivision, lot
averaging, Transfer of Development Rights, conserva-
tion easements, and low-impact development perfor-
mance standards. The City will modify its development
review process to ensure consideration and protection
of priority natural resources.
105Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use Areas
Map 26 - Future Land Use Areas with Natural Resource Overlay
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
GR
GR
GR
GR
GR
GR
GR
GR
GR
AG C
AG C
AG C
AG C
VMU
VN
M
M
REC Pro
REC Pro
REC Pro
REC Pro
R COMMST CROIXREC Pro
REC Pro
R COMM
GR
AG C
REC Pro
GR
AG C
AG C
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Clear Lake
Sylvan Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lofton Ave N185th St N
Mayberry Tr N Nolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N Olinda Tr N177 th St N Pil
ar Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Ma
n
n
i
n
g
T
r NMelanie Tr N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NOakhill Rd N
Old Marine Tr NSai
nt Cr
oi
x
Tr
NSaint Croix Tr NMayber
r
y Tr
NOlinda Tr NOlinda Tr N240th St N
1 7 7 t h S t N
City of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Data Sources: MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council,
City of Scandia
November 11, 2008
AG C
GR
M
R COMM
VMU
VN
ST CROIX
REC Protected
REC Planned
Natural Resource Priority Areas
City Boundary
Park Boundaries
Open Water
Streams
Future Land Use Areas with
Natural Resource Overlay
Future Land Use Areas with
Natural Resource Overlay
Mining Area
Rural
Commercial
Nodes
Recreation Area
Protected
Recreation Area
Planned
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
GR
GR
GR
GR
GR
GR
GR
GR
GR
AG C
AG C
AG C
AG C
VMU
VN
M
M
REC Pro
REC Pro
REC Pro
REC Pro
R COMMST CROIXREC Pro
REC Pro
R COMM
GR
AG C
REC Pro
GR
AG C
AG C
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Clear Lake
Sylvan Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lofton Ave N185th St N
Mayberry Tr N Nolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N Olinda Tr N177 th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Ma
n
n
i
n
g
T
r NMelanie Tr N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NP
aris
h
R
d N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NOakhill Rd N
Old Marine Tr NSa
i
n
t Cr
o
i
x
Tr
NSaint Croix Tr NMayber
r
y Tr
NOlinda Tr NOlinda Tr N240th St N
1 7 7 t h S t N
City of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Data Sources: MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council,
City of Scandia
July 6, 2008
AG C
GR
M
R COMM
VMU
VN
ST CROIX
REC Protected
REC Planned
Natural Resource Priority Areas
Parcels
City Boundary
Park Boundaries
Open Water
Streams
Future Land Use Areas with
Natural Resource Overlay
Future Land Use Areas with
Natural Resource Overlay
106 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use Areas
Map 27 - Future Land Use Areas
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSøA
GR
GR
GR
GR
GR
GR
GR
GR
GR
AG C
AG C
AG C
AG C
VMU
VN
M
M
REC Pro
REC Pro
REC Pro
REC Pro
R COMMST CROIXREC Pro
REC Pro
R COMM
GR
AG C
REC Pro
GR
AG C
AG C
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Clear Lake
Sylvan Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
2 05th S t N
240 th St N
Lofton Ave N185th St N
Mayberry Tr N Nolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N Olinda Tr N177 th St N Pil
a
r Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Ma
n
n
i
n
g
T
r NMelanie Tr N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NOakhill Rd N
Old Marine Tr NSai
nt Cr
oi
x
Tr
NSaint Croix Tr NMayber
r
y Tr
NOlinda Tr NOlinda Tr N240th St N
1 7 7 t h S t N
City of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Data Sources: MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council,
City of Scandia
December 14, 2008
AG C
GR
VMU
VN
ST CROIX
Lake Shoreland
LST
LSC
City Boundary
Park Boundaries
Open Water
Streams
Future Land Use AreasFuture Land Use Areas
Mining Area
Rural
Commercial
Nodes
Recreation Area
Protected
Recreation Area
Planned
107Scandia Comprehensive Plan
In the core of the village, buildings shall be of a size and have setbacks that reflect “down-
town” character. Design standards for commercial and light industrial will be developed to
insure that Scandia’s rural village character is preserved. Minimum lot sizes will be restricted
only by the area necessary for sewage treatment.
Currently, the eastern commercial area and the village core are poorly connected. In order
to increase cohesiveness and connectedness, a transportation connection will be constructed
from the eastern commercial area to the village core. Non-motorized connections will also
be improved throughout the village area. Map 31 - Planned Village Transportation Improvements,
page 150, shows the desired connections for new street and non-motorized connections in
the village.
Future Land Use Areas
The Village Center Mixed-Use Area is the core of the existing village center. This land use
category recognizes the significant contribution of the existing village center to the overall
character of the community. The current mixed-use nature of the village center will be en-
couraged and revitalized in the area. New commercial, retail, and residential activity will be
encouraged in order to develop and redevelop areas in the village center.
Village Center Mixed-Use Area
Village Neighborhood Area
Primary land uses in the Village Center Mixed-Use
Area will include commercial, office, retail, public
and private institutions, civic buildings, light indus-
trial, and parks and recreation. Residential will be a
secondary use, including single-family homes, town-
homes, and multi-family buildings. Multi-family
buildings in the village center will achieve the goal
of diversifying the housing options for younger
families, seniors, and singles. Future lot sizes will be
similar to the existing mix of lot sizes in the village
center. In order to support these relatively small lot
sizes, community sewer systems are anticipated.
The Village Neighborhood Areas are planned exten-
sions of the Village Center, located adjacent to and
north, east and west of the Village Center. This land
use category designates growth areas surrounding
the village, and is intended to support single and
multi-family residential uses on lot sizes reflective of
the existing village lot sizes. Except that lot sizes in
the Goose Lake shoreland area shall remain consis-
tent with those allowed under the current shoreland
ordinance.
The primary land use for the Village Neighborhood
Areas will be small-lot, single-family residential uses.
Public and private institutions, civic buildings, and
108 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
The Agricultural Core Area includes large contiguous
areas where agricultural production is the predominant
use. This land use category is intended to protect and
encourage long-term agricultural production. Map
28 - Prime Agricultural Soils, shows the areas in Scandia
with the best soils for agricultural production.
The primary land use will be agricultural production,
including specialty agriculture. It is anticipated that
the nature of agricultural production will change in the
future from traditional dairy farms to small-scale spe-
cialty agriculture oriented towards local and metropoli-
Future Land Use Areas
parks and recreation uses will also be allowed. Townhomes and multi-family units will be
allowed as an incentive for providing community value through agricultural land protection,
life-cycle housing or natural resource protection. A community sewer system may be neces-
sary in order to allow for lot sizes similar to existing village lots.
By concentrating development in the Village Neighborhood Area, Scandia hopes to protect
agricultural and natural resource areas from development pressure. To ensure that the Vil-
lage Neighborhood Area truly deflects development from other areas, it will be designated
as a receiving area for development rights transferred from Agricultural Core Areas or
Natural Resource Protection Areas if a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program is
developed.
Design standards will be developed to ensure that development within the Village Neighbor-
hood Area is visually compatible with the existing village development pattern. Street and
sidewalk standards will also be developed to connect new development to the village center.
The Agricultural Preserves Overlay lies over the two primary agricultural future land use
areas: the Agricultural Core Area and the General Rural Area. The Agricultural Preserves
Overlay will allow individual property owners within Scandia to continue to participate in the
Agricultural Preserves Program. This voluntary program for landowners within the seven-
county metropolitan area allows individuals to place their properties under a restrictive cov-
enant committing their property to agricultural use, in exchange for certain benefits. These
include a special tax rate calculated based on agricultural value rather than market value, a
property tax credit, protection of normal farm practices, and protection against special as-
sessments for public improvement projects.
The Agricultural Preserves Overlay is necessary because properties enrolled in the program
must be designated by the local unit of government and zoned for a density of no more
than one dwelling unit per 40 acres. While the underlying areas (Agricultural Core Area and
General Rural Area) allow 4 dwellings per 40 acres, parcels enrolled in the Agricultural Pre-
serves Program and located within the Agricultural Preserves Overlay shall be allowed only 1
unit per 40 acres.
Agricultural Preserves Overlay Area
Agricultural Core Area
109Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use Areas
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Sylvan Lake
Hay Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
Oakhill Rd N
2 0 5 th S t N
240th St N
Lofton Ave N185th St N
Mayberry Tr N Nolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N Oli
nda Tr
N177 th St N Pil
a
r Rd
N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Manning Tr NMel
ani
e Tr
NOxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr NKeystone Ave NOst
rum Tr NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NOlinda Tr NManning Tr NOakhill Rd N
Keystone Ave NSai
n
t Cr
oi
x
Tr
N1 7 7 t h S t NMayber
r
y Tr
NSaint Croix Tr NOlinda Tr N24 0th St N
Sai
nt Croix Tr NOld Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Prime Agricultural SoilsPrime Agricultural Soils
Prime
Prime if not frequently flooded
Prime if drained
Prime if drained and not frequently flooded
City Boundary
Section Lines
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
Open Water
Streams
Data Sources: MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council,
MN Geological Survey
June 7, 2008
Map 28 - Prime Agricultural Soils
110 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use Areas
General Rural Area
tan markets. Residential development compatible with agriculture will be a secondary use in
the Agricultural Core Area as will parks and recreation. Recreational commercial activities
will be a conditional use.
The Agricultural Core Area will have a density of four units per 40 acres. Within the 4 per
40 density limit, a variety of lot sizes will be encouraged through the use of lot averaging
zoning. Lot averaging allows lots of 2 to 5 acres in size or 20 acres or greater. These lot
sizes are designed to support continuation of agricultural uses and minimize conflict with
residential uses. Bonus densities not exceeding 75% of base density may be earned as an
incentive for using open space conservation subdivision. Bonuses may be earned only if de-
velopers undertake actions such as permanent protection of agricultural land or open space,
or protection or enhancement of natural resources. Open space conservation subdivisions in
the Agricultural Core Area must incorporate permanent protection of agriculture as a focal
theme of the subdivision. In general, the continued viability of agricultural uses should be
considered in the siting of structures and drives.
To further protect farmland and encourage the continuation of agricultural uses, the City
will investigate an incentive program for farmland protection. The incentive program may
include a purchase of development rights or Transfer of Development Rights program.
The General Rural Area land use category is a residential area of mixed lot sizes. It recog-
nizes areas of Scandia that have been developed in the past at ten acre or less densities and
areas that have larger parcels still used for agriculture. The area includes 10 acre parcels, but
also a significant number of existing smaller parcels and some parcels enrolled in the Metro
Agricultural Preserves Program. The intent of the General Rural Area is to establish a rural
residential area that directly meets the Metropolitan Council guidance of densities of no
more than 1 housing unit per 10 acres.
Single-family residential dwellings will be the primary
land use for the General Rural Area. Secondary land uses
will include agricultural production including small-scale
production, parks and recreation and public and private
institutions. Recreational commercial uses will be allowed
as a conditional use.
The General Rural Area will be developed at a maximum
density of four dwelling units per 40 acres with a minimum
allowed lot size of 2 acres (lot averaging is not required).
Development in this area is anticipated to be a mix of
open space conservation subdivisions and large acreage
parcels depending on the nature of the land. Incentives
may be provided for conservation design to protect natural
resources, scenic qualities and farming or open space.
Incentives may include bonuses not exceeding 75% of the
base density and flexible development standards. Bonuses
may be earned only if developers undertake actions such
111Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use Areas
as permanent protection or enhancement of natural resources, or protection of agricultural
land or open space. The General Rural Area could be a possible Transfer of Development
Rights receiving area.
The General Rural Area includes areas to the north, east, and south of the village center and
other areas that are currently developed at five acre average densities. The higher density is
attributable to zoning that pre-dates the Metropolitan Council’s 10-acre density threshold.
Other than extremely limited in-fill, new five acre lots will not be built because it conflicts
with guidance from the Metropolitan Council.
Lakeshore Traditional Overlay Area
The Lakeshore Traditional Overlay Area includes
existing shoreland areas with traditional patterns of
small lot development. Expansion of traditional
small lot lakeshore development areas is not anticipat-
ed. Single family residential and parks and recreation
are the primary land uses in the Lakeshore Traditional
Overlay Area. Densities in the overlay area must
conform to the current City of Scandia Shoreland
Ordinance. According to the Shoreland Ordinance,
Big Marine, Bone, Sylvan, and Goose Lakes have 2.5
acre minimum lot sizes with a minimum 150 foot lot
width for Tier 1 riparian lots. Natural Environment
Lakes, other than Goose Lake, have a minimum 5 acre
lot size with a minimum 300 foot lot width for Tier 1
riparian lots. The dimensions of Tier 2 non-riparian
lots are controlled by the underlying zoning district.
The Lakeshore Conservation Overlay Area includes
all shoreland areas that are largely undeveloped.
Lakeshore Conservation Overlay Areas will protect
sensitive lakeshore areas where development would
result in relatively large negative impacts to natural
resources.
Single-family residential dwellings and parks and
recreation will be the primary land uses in the Lake-
shore Conservation Overlay Areas. Development
will be allowed at a density of eight units per 40 acres
and open space conservation subdivision meeting
the standards in the current zoning ordinance will be
encouraged in these areas. Minimum lot setbacks and
lot dimensional standards that exceed the minimums
in the Lakeshore Traditional Overlay Area shall be
established for Tier 1 riparian lots.
Lakeshore Conservation Overlay Area
112 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use Areas
St. Croix River Corridor Area
The St. Croix River Corridor Area recognizes the
unique historical and natural resource aspects of
the floodplain and bluffs of the shoreland area
of the St. Croix River. This area includes historic
crossroad and resort communities, parkland, river
access, and areas protected under scenic easements
held by the National Park Service. The mapped
area east of State Highway 95 corresponds to land
areas protected under federal wild and scenic river
designation. The future of this area includes limited
residential development that protects the natural
and scenic shoreland areas, and public and private
protected lands.
Rural Commercial Nodes
New development in the St. Croix River Corridor shall be at a density of 4 units per 40
acres. Smaller lots may be permitted through the use of open space conservation subdivi-
sions, but must still not exceed maximum densities (no bonuses). Viewsheds should be
considered and protected in the siting of structures and driveways.
The Rural Commercial Nodes future land use area
is intended to support commercial development in
places of historic commercial activity. These areas
are the only commercial areas anticipated outside of
the Village Center and are intended not to com-
pete with, but rather complement, Village Center
commercial uses. Rural Commercial Nodes are
designated at the historic commercial nodes of the
Big Marine Store, Copas/Abrahamson Nurseries,
Otisville, and the intersection of Highways 95 and
97. Commercial uses reflecting the historic nature
of the commercial node and compatible with the
surrounding rural character will be allowed on lot
sizes of at least 2 acres. Because this future land
use area builds upon historic character, commercial
building design standards shall reflect the historic
nature of the commercial node.
113Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use Areas
The Recreation Area – Protected land use category
includes publicly-owned lands permanently protect-
ed from development. This designation recognizes
that these areas will continue to be used for rec-
reation or open space only and not developed. If
recreation facilities are developed within these areas,
priority natural resource areas shall be protected.
In addition, priority natural resources should be
restored and enhanced wherever possible within
protected recreation areas.
Recreation Area – Protected
The Recreation Area – Planned land use category designates areas for future parks or park
expansion. This includes areas within statutory boundaries of state and county parks that
are not currently owned by the state or county and the area in the northeast corner of the
City owned by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. All of these areas are antici-
pated to be used for park use in the future. Until planned recreation areas are acquired for
recreation purposes, the underlying land use category shall be followed. If acquired, the land
shall be used only for recreation and open space uses.
The Mining Area includes areas in the City of Scandia with active, permitted mining opera-
tions. This includes area in northwest Scandia (where 2 operations are adjacent) and one
area in the southeast. Mining activity is anticipated to continue in these areas in the future.
Mining uses must comply with local and state extractive use regulations and reclamation shall
restore the topography and natural resources of the site to a level such that the land is suit-
able for the planned future land uses such as agriculture or residential.
Recreation Area – Planned
Mining Area
Scenic Roads and Viewsheds is a future land use category
intended to identify areas adjacent to scenic roads that
contain views important to maintaining the City’s rural
character. An assessment to identify scenic roads and
viewsheds was initiated as part of the comprehensive plan-
ning process and will be completed in the near future. Sce-
nic roads and viewsheds are not shown on the future land
use map. As final scenic roads and viewsheds are identi-
fied, scenic road construction standards and scenic view
standards should be developed. These standards could in-
clude design and locational restrictions on structures. The
land uses allowed along scenic roads or in scenic viewsheds
will be those of the underlying future land use areas such
as Agricultural Core or St. Croix River Corridor.
Scenic Roads and Viewsheds
114 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use Areas
Vacant Land Development Capacity
The Metropolitan Council System Statement for Scandia designates the City as a “diversified
rural” community with a forecast increase in population (from 2000 to 2030) of 1,708 and
an increase of 806 households. The Metropolitan Council defines diversified rural commu-
nities in the following manner:
Diversified rural areas include a mix of a limited amount of large-lot residential and clustered
housing with agricultural and other rural uses. Growth in the diversified rural areas should be
consistent with regional forecasts, at densities of no more than 1 housing unit per 10 acres (Revised
System Statement, New Scandia Township, November 30, 2005, p. 2).
The City of Scandia’s Comprehensive Plan identifies a mix of land uses in a variety of
forms, including agricultural development, residential housing clustered in Scandia’s village
areas and in conservation development in Scandia’s lakeshore areas, and large lot residen-
tial development. The average density for new housing, based on the forecast of 806 new
households, is estimated to be over ten acres per unit, excluding protected park and recre-
ation land and areas designated for nonresidential land uses. Furthermore, Scandia is inves-
tigating density transfer, such as a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program that will
protect the rural environment and create efficient development patterns that retain flexibility
for post 2030 planning.
Over 75% of the City’s acreage open for residential development is in land use categories
that designate a lot size of 10 acres or greater, and are designated for larger lots than the
1998 Plan. The two areas where lot sizes are smaller than 10 acres are the village neighbor-
hood area and the lakeshore areas. Directing growth toward the village area, where com-
munity wastewater systems are already used and could be most cost-effectively expanded,
is consistent with the Metropolitan Council’s growth policy #1 for diversified rural areas,
particularly as Scandia is outside the Metropolitan Council’s designated ultimate sewer ser-
vice area:
Preserve areas where post-2030 growth can provided with cost-effective and efficient urban infra-
structure . . . Locally oversee the management and maintenance of alternative wastewater treat-
ment systems such as community drainfields to avoid the environmental and economic costs from
failed systems. (2030 Regional Development Framework, p. 28).
The growth planned for lakeshore areas, which requires conservation design, is similarly
consistent with policy #1:
Adopt conservation subdivision ordinances, cluster development ordinances, or environmental protec-
tion provisions in land use ordinances.
115Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Map 29 - Future Land Use Areas and Parcels with Homes
Future Land Use Areas
!
!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!
!
!!
!
!!!
!!!!!!
!!!!!
!
!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!
!!!!
!!!
!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!
!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!
!
!!!!
!
!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!
!
!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!
!
!
!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!
!!!!!!
!
!
!!!!
!!
!!!!!
!!!!!!!
!
!!!
!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!!!
!!!!
!
!
!!
!!!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!
!
!
!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!
!!!!!!!
!!!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!
!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!
!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!
!!!
!!
!!!!!!
!!!
!!!!!
!
!!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!
!
!
!!!!!!!!
!!
!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!
!!!
!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!
!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!
!!
!!!!!!!!
!!!!!
!!!!
!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!
!!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!
!!!!
!
!!!
!!!
!!!
!!!!
!!!!!!
!!
!
!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!!!
!!!
!!
!
!!!!!
!
!!
!
!!!!!!!
!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!
!!
!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!
!!
!!
!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!
!!!
!!!!!!!!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!
!
!!!!
!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!!!!!
!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSøA
GR
GR
GR
GR
GR
GR
GR
GR
GR
AG C
AG C
AG C
AG C
VMU
VN
M
M
REC Pro
REC Pro
REC Pro
REC Pro
R COMMST CROIXREC Pro
REC Pro
R COMM
GR
AG C
REC Pro
GR
AG C
AG C
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Clear Lake
Sylvan Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205 th S t N
240th St N
Lofton Ave N185th St N
Mayberry Tr N Nolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N Olinda Tr N177 th St N Pil
ar Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Ma
n
n
i
n
g
T
r NMelanie Tr N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NOakhill Rd N
Old Marine Tr NSai
nt Cr
oi
x
Tr
NSaint Croix Tr NMayber
r
y Tr
NOlinda Tr NOlinda Tr N240th St N
1 7 7 t h S t N
City of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Data Sources: MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council,
City of Scandia
December 14, 2008
AG C
GR
VMU
VN
ST CROIX
Parcels
Lake Shoreland
LST
LSC
City Boundary
Park Boundaries
Open Water
Streams
Future Land Use AreasFuture Land Use Areas
!Parcels with Homes
Mining Area
Rural
Commercial
Nodes
Recreation Area
Protected
Recreation Area
Planned
116 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use Areas
Development Density Analysis
Table 27, Acres and number of parcels by future land use category, shows the total acres, the
developed acres (parcels with an existing structure) and the undeveloped/vacant acres
(parcels without a structure) for future land use categories that are portrayed on Map 29.
The first seven of the twelve categories are planned to allow residential development. The
remaining five categories are commercial, industrial, and open space land uses. Over half of
the land in Scandia is within parcels with an existing structure (10,450 acres are in developed
parcels out of a total of 19,586 acres that are potentially developable).
Table 27 - Acres and number of parcels by future land use category
Future Land Use
Category
Total1 Developed Parcels with Structures Vacant Parcels
# of
Parcels
Total
Acres
# of
Parcels
Total
acres
Acres/
Parcel
Max.
Planned
Density
# of
parcels
Total
acres
AG C 307 6,052 153 2,648 17.3 10.0 154 3,404
GR 1,232 7,099 800 5,110 6.4 10.0 432 1,989
ST CROIX 64 231 24 88 3.7 10.0 40 143
VN 124 343 57 199 3.5 2.5 67 144
LST (riparian)2 357 419 220 311 1.4 2.5 137 108
LST (non-riparian)2 62 183 43 155 3.6 5.0 19 28
LSC (riparian only)3 282 3,233 150 1,669 11.1 5.0 132 1,564
Mining 3 78 3 78 26.0 0 0
VMU 109 218 38 77 2.0 71 141
REC Protected 105 1687 4 75 18.8 101 1,612
REC Planned 15 184 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
R Comm 3 43 1 40 40.0 2 3
Totals4 2,648 19,586 1,493 10,450 134 1,155 9,136
1 Excludes publicly-owned land except in REC Protected, cemeteries, state park expansion areas (shown as an overlay on
Map 29), and parcels with conservation easements.
2 LST is divided into riparian and non-riparian categories because of the different planned density for each category.
However, both of these categories are considered fully built out.
3 Non-riparian lots in LSC are calculated as part of the underlying land use area. The underlying category determines
the planned density.
4 Excludes REC Planned, which is an overlay and included in the totals for the underlying categories.
In analyzing development density we first look at average size of existing developed parcels
to determine resubdivision opportunities. As can be noted in Table 27, Acres and number
of parcels by future land use category, the average acreage for existing developed parcels within
most future land use category is smaller than the minimum planned future lot size, with
three exceptions (the AG C/Agricultural Core, VN/Village Neighborhood and the LSC/
Lakeshore Conservation categories). For two of the three exceptions (AG C and VN),
the average developed lot size is less than twice the minimum lot size, meaning that few
resubdivision opportunities exist for parcels with structures (resubdivision may occur
117Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use Areas
only on parcels at least twice the minimum lot size). Thus, few residential resubdivision
opportunities exist for parcels with structures in future land use categories where residential
development is envisioned.
As shown in Table 28, Theoretical Buildout, in categories that allow residential development,
Scandia has 7,380 acres of land in 981 parcels that are undeveloped (that do not have a
structure). The 7,380 acres excludes publicly-owned parcels, cemeteries, state park expansion
areas, and parcels with conservation easements within areas designated for residential
development. Assuming the Metropolitan Council growth forecast of 806 new households
over the planning period; this produces an average lot size in land use areas designated for
residential development of 9.2 acres per lot (7,380 acres divided by 806 new households).
To double check the consistency of Scandia’s Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map
with the System Statement, Scandia created a theoretical buildout of its Future Land Use
Map. The buildout assumes that development will occur only on undeveloped parcels at
maximum planned densities within the future land use categories that allow residential
development. Public land, protected land, and cemetery parcels are excluded from
buildable acres. In addition, wetland acres are excluded in Future Land Use areas with small
minimum lot sizes under the assumption that in these areas the presence of wetlands may
prevent development. Future Land Use areas with larger minimum lots sizes do not exclude
wetlands under the assumption that a suitable building site can be located on the large parcel.
The buildout similarly excludes vacant sub-standard infill parcels in the LST category.
Virtually all lots in the LST category are unbuildable under State Shoreland Rules, and the
land use category is considered fully built out.
Table 28, Theoretical buildout, shows the density implications of a full theoretifcal buildout of
Scandia at maximum planned densities resulting in 856 new housing units, rather than the
System Statement forecast of 806. Initially, 7,380 total acres are considered available for
development. Approximately 409 acres of this are wetlands in areas with smaller lot sizes
that are unlikely to be developed. Wetland acres in large lot districts were not excluded - few
wetlands are so big as to prevent subdivision into buildable 10 acre parcels. Another 48 acres
in the LST areas are unbuildable as being small substandard lots, designated in Table 28 as
fully built. Therefore, for the purposes of the buildout analysis, a total of 6,923 acres (total
vacant acres minus some wetland and all LST acres) of land are considered available for new
homes in Scandia within future land use areas designated for residential development. A full
theoretical buildout by 2030, at maximum planned densities, would result in an average lot
size of 8.6 acres (7,380 acres/856 housing units).
The Comprehensive Plan does anticipate the use of bonus density to encourage
conservation design in new subdivisions. Assuming that every new development takes full
advantage of the bonus density, the theoretical buildout shows a significantly higher number
of new households than forecast by the Metropolitan Council (166% of the forecast), and
a much higher average density than targeted in the System Statement (5.5 acres per lot).
However, a complete buildout using conservation design is extremely unlikely, as is a 66%
increase in anticipated growth.
Theoretical Buildout
118 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Table 28 - Theoretical buildout
Future
Land Use
Category
Total
vacant
acres
Wetland
acres
Net
buildable
acres
Maximum
planned
density
New homes
(no bonus)
% of
Total
New homes
(with bonus)% of Total
AG C 3,404 n/a1 3,404 10.0 340 40%596 45%
GR 1,989 n/a1 1,989 10.0 199 23%348 26%
ST CROIX 143 n/a1 143 10.0 14 2%14 1%
VN 144 18 126 2.5 50 6%126 9%
LST 2.5 108 75 33 2.5 Fully Built2 0%Fully Built2 0%
LST 5 28 13 15 5.0 Fully Built2 0%Fully Built2 0%
LSC 1,564 303 1,261 5.0 252 29%252 19%
Totals 7,380 409 6,923
Avg - 8.6
acres 856 100%1,336 100%
1 Wetland acres were not excluded from land use categories with 10-acre planned density. 10 acre lots are sufficiently
large to accommodate both wetlands and a buildable site.
2 LST lots, both vacant and developed, are frequently substandard by State Shoreland standards. The City considers the
area to be fully developed. LST acres are excluded from the total for net buildable acres.
Finally, although the Metropolitan Council 2005 System Statement does not explicitly
acknowledge Scandia’s historic village area, the village was approved in the 1998 New
Scandia Township Plan as a separate growth area. Scandia’s 2008 Comprehensive Plan
similarly calls for denser growth in the village area. If the village area is excluded from the
10 acre minimum lot size requirement, the theoretical buildout density averages 9.0 acres
without conservation design bonuses, and 6.0 acres with 100% of allowed bonuses.
Table 29, Average density for residential development areas, summarizes the average density for
existing conditions and various buildout scenarios. The total acres column includes all
wetland acres.
Table 29 - Average density for residential development areas
Scenario Parcels
Total
Acres
Avg.
Density
Parcels with existing homes 1,447 10,180 7.0
Parcels without homes 981 7,380 7.5
Theoretical Build-out of Comp Plan
Housing
Units
Met Council forecast 806 7,380 9.2
Build-out assuming no bonuses 856 7,380 8.6
Build-out assuming full bonuses 1,336 7,380 5.5
Build-out excluding village assuming no bonuses 806 7,236 9.0
Build-out excluding village assuming full bonuses 1,210 7,236 6.0
Future Land Use Areas
119Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and Strategies
Introduction
Goals and Policies Connect to Vision
Scandia’s vision narrative describes the desired long-range outcome of Scandia’s future
development, investment, and protection efforts. The future land use map similarly shows
the long-range outcome in terms of Scandia’s preferred mix of land uses after the vision has
been achieved. The goals, policies, and implementation strategies connect to the vision and
the future land use map by describing discrete actions to be undertaken by the City.
The vision and future land use map are of limited value if the Plan does not identify mid-
term and short term details for how the vision is achieved. Goals and policies provide an
increasing level of detail for achieving components of the vision and future land use map.
Goal and policy statements are structured as outcomes, similar to the vision, but more nar-
rowly focused and with a shorter term focus. Goals are broad statements that set mid-term
outcomes that will move Scandia toward the vision. Policies are subordinate to goals, identi-
fying shorter-term outcomes that will similarly move Scandia toward the goal, and ultimately
toward its vision and future land use map.
Goals and policies work interactively with the vision and the future land use map to form
the Comprehensive Plan. The goal and policy language must be read within the context of
the vision and future land use. Similarly, the vision and future land use map are defined and
clarified by the goals and policies.
Goals and policies define the mid- and short-term details for achieving Scandia’s vision.
Implementation strategies identify the preferred tools for meeting the goals and policies. A
range of implementation tools are available to Scandia to shape the way that development
occurs to be consistent with the Plan vision, goals, and policies: to maintain the community’s
rural character, to protect natural resources, to sustain Scandia’s high quality of life. Imple-
mentation strategies define the methods that Scandia uses to move toward its long-term
vision.
Implementation tools can be separated into the following four categories, all of which are
available to Scandia. Each type of tool has advantages and disadvantages that make it suit-
able for specific goals and situations. The optimal overall implementation strategy uses tools
from each category in order to take advantage of each tool’s strengths and to minimize each
tool’s weaknesses.
Education and Promotion – Educational and promotional programs encourage indi-
viduals or businesses to undertake voluntary actions that help to fulfill Scandia’s Com-
prehensive Plan vision, goals, and policies. Encouragement can include:
• Design standards that identify Scandia’s preferences for how subdivisions or build-
ings function and look
• Educational materials for citizens on the impacts of their choices on community
resources, such as lake water quality
Moving Forward in Action - Implementation Strategies
120 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and Strategies
• Promotion of comprehensive plan goals and policies to ensure that developers,
businesses, land owners, and residents have the opportunity to comply voluntarily
Incentives and Incentive Regulations – In addition to educational programs, Scan-
dia can offer incentives to induce individuals or businesses to take actions that help the
community reach its goals. Incentives may include:
• Direct financial assistance such as cost sharing
• Indirect financial assistance such as tax breaks or infrastructure improvements
• Regulatory incentives such as density bonuses or flexible regulatory options
• Professional assistance incentives such as technical assistance in façade or infrastruc-
ture design, integration of historic elements, or meeting State or Federal regulatory
standards
City Ordinances and other Regulations – Scandia’s land development ordinances are
the primary regulatory tool and include zoning, subdivision, shoreland, stormwater, and
other ordinances. Administrative approval processes are also part of this tool. Examples
of regulatory tools include:
• Threshold standards such as minimum or maximum lot sizes, height requirements,
natural resource functional values, etc.
• Performance standards that regulate development impacts such as risk from erosion
during development, risks to water quality from stormwater runoff, visual elements
including building appearance and effects on viewsheds, and nuisances such as
noise, smell, and traffic generated by particular land uses
• Administrative standards such as the information or analyses to be submitted to
review whether proposed development meets regulatory standards
• The order of and timing of approvals during the development process
Managing Public Resources, Lands and Processes – Public investments and man-
agement decisions for infrastructure, public services, public lands, and public processes.
Such investments or decisions may include:
• Capital improvements planning coordination between departments to meet Com-
prehensive Plan goals
• Water, wastewater, and transportation investments made by the City or ultimately
managed by the City
• Land acquisition, sale or exchange for the purpose of preservation or development
• Acquisition and management of land or easements to meet park, recreation, and
trails goals
The hierarchy of goals, policies, and strategies provides an increasing level of detail for how
to meet Scandia’s long term vision. Each goal has one or more policy, and each policy is as-
sociated with one or more strategy The recommended strategies include tools from all four
categories, providing Scandia with a complete toolbox as it moves to implement its Compre-
hensive Plan.
121Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and Strategies
Natural Resources
Water Resource Management
Wastewater Goals & Policies
NR Goal 1: Protect surface water and groundwater quality through proper installation, maintenance, and
monitoring of wastewater systems.
NR Policy 1.1: In keeping with its general rural character, Scandia plans to continue relying primar-
ily on individual on-site water and sewer systems to serve both existing and future development in ar-
eas outside the village center. (See related LU Policy 2.7 regarding Village wastewater services)
NR Policy 1.2: Alternative and experimental wastewater treatment systems designed to serve a
group of residential units may be considered for developments in the village center or as part of
Open Space Conservation Subdivision projects, provided they are privately owned and conform to
adopted ordinance standards. (See related policy LU 2.7 regarding Village wastewater services)
NR Implementation Strategy 1.2.1: The City will develop and adopt standards for the
design, installation, and maintenance of alternative and experimental wastewater treatment
systems.
NR Policy 1.3: In cooperation with Washington County, the City will enforce strict conformance
with regulations for the design, installation, and maintenance of on-site treatment systems including
minimum design, licensing, and installation requirements of the Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080.
NR Policy 1.4: Continue to operate and maintain community systems on Big Marine Lake and in
the Village. Consider the feasibility of extending centralized wastewater treatment to serve the vil-
lage area.
NR Goal 2: Preserve, protect, and enhance surface water quality in Scandia.
NR Policy 2.1: Work cooperatively with local watershed districts.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.1.1: The City will implement its Local Water Management
Plan that conforms to the standards and rules of the watershed districts.
NR Policy 2.2: Work with Washington County, local watershed districts, the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency, and other agencies to address impaired water bodies within the City.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.2.1: The City will participate in Total Maximum Daily
Load studies and Implementation Plans to address impaired water bodies within the City.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.2.2: The City will provide educational materials to resi-
dents and businesses regarding the relationship between stormwater runoff and impaired
waters. (See NR Implementation Strategy 2.5.1 and 2.9.1)
Surface Water Management Goals & Policies
122 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and Strategies
NR Implementation Strategy 2.2.3: The City will develop and adopt an Operations and
Maintenance Manual that outlines “good housekeeping” practices that can be used to reduce
pollutants in stormwater runoff leaving City-owned sites. (See NR Implementation Strat-
egy 2.8.1)
NR Implementation Strategy 2.2.4: The City will work with other units of government
and other partners to identify waters in danger of becoming impaired and work to avoid
these waters being listed as impaired in the future.
NR Policy 2.3: Continue working with local watershed districts that have permitting authority in the
City to jointly review development permits for impacts on surface waters.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.3.1: The City will work with local watershed districts to
develop a streamlined process for sharing and reviewing permits with potential impacts to
surface waters.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.3.2: The City will work with local watershed districts to
create and distribute an Information Packet with information on application requirements,
deadlines, the review process, permitting requirements of the City and local watershed dis-
tricts, etc., to developers at the beginning of the development process.
NR Policy 2.4: Design new development to minimize impacts on surface water, groundwater,
floodplains, steep slopes, wetlands, and other environmentally sensitive areas.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.4.1: (This strategy is repeated as strategies 5.1.2 and 6.1.1)
The City will develop and adopt an ordinance requiring all development to utilize low-impact
techniques that:
• Utilize the Natural Resource Protection Areas map to identify large, connected natural
systems
• Consider the impact of development on rare plant and animal species
• Preserve the natural features of the site or utilize constructed systems that mimic the
natural hydrologic system
• Reduce storm water runoff to pre-development levels
• Retain, infiltrate, and filter stormwater runoff before its release into the City’s water
bodies
• Eliminate or entrap pollutants before they enter surface waters
• Restore or enhance the ability of soils to absorb, retain, and infiltrate water
• Minimize impervious surfaces in new development
Natural Resources
NR Policy 2.5: Encourage landowners in already developed areas to improve stormwater drainage
to reduce the volume of runoff and polluted runoff.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.5.1: The City will provide educational materials to resi-
dents and business regarding practices that can reduce the volume of runoff or improve the
quality of runoff.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.5.2: The City may consider incentives such as tax breaks
or cost-share programs for landowners who install practices that reduce or disconnect im-
pervious surfaces or allow water to be slowed or detained in vegetated areas.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.5.3: The City will help promote existing stormwater man-
agement related cost-share programs offered by local watershed districts and other partners.
123Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and Strategies
NR Implementation Strategy 2.5.4: Create an inventory of stormwater facilities within
the City, both public and private, and determine whether facilities are functioning as
designed.
NR Policy 2.6: Protect surface waters by enforcing the following regulations:
• State shoreland management regulations and the City’s Shoreland Ordinance
• Erosion and sedimentation control standards of the MPCA
• Wetland alteration and mitigation requirements of the Wetland Conservation Act
(WCA) and local watershed districts
NR Implementation Strategy 2.6.1: The City will work to integrate enforcement of regu-
lations designed to protect sensitive areas with the City’s other enforcement and inspection
functions.
NR Policy 2.7: Work with local watershed districts to assess wetlands and preserve them as es-
sential components of the hydrologic system and valuable wildlife habitat; restore degraded wetland
resources where possible.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.7.1: The City will cooperate with local watershed districts
to complete a functions and values assessment and will use the results to preserve and pro-
tect wetlands within the City.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.7.2: The City may consider incentives like tax breaks or
cost-share programs for land owners who restore wetland resources outside of the WCA
mitigation process.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.7.3: The City will create, protect, and enforce the creation
and preservation of upland buffers adjacent to wetlands.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.7.4: Through a change in the Subdivision Ordinance,
the City will require development applicants to delineate wetlands and complete a wetland
assessment using the MnRAM 3.0 process or higher. The subdivision review process will
consider this information to determine if the development project has potential to negatively
impact a protected wetland. If potential impact is identified, mitigation for the impact shall
be required as part of development approval.
NR Policy 2.8: Demonstrate a commitment to improving surface water quality by incorporating
best practices on City owned property.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.8.1: The City will limit the use of pesticides and herbi-
cides on City-owned property.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.8.2: The City will implement innovative stormwater man-
agement practices to control runoff from City-owned property.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.8.3: The City will develop and adopt an Operations and
Maintenance Manual for City-owned property that outlines “good housekeeping” practices
that can be used to reduce pollutants in stormwater runoff leaving City-owned sites. (See
NR Implementation Strategy 2.2.3)
NR Policy 2.9: Provide educational materials to residents about the connection between human
activities (e.g. impervious surfaces, lawn care, winter sidewalk and road maintenance, etc) and water
quality and the cumulative effects of individual actions.
Natural Resources
124 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
NR Implementation Strategy 2.9.1: The City will provide educational materials to resi-
dents and businesses regarding the relationship between stormwater runoff and water qual-
ity. (See NR Implementation Strategy 2.2.2)
NR Implementation Strategy 2.9.2: The City will support and promote the existing
water-related education efforts of local watershed districts, Washington County, and other
agencies.
NR Policy 2.10: Consider the appropriate limitations on impervious surfaces on residential lots and
appropriate use of pervious driveway and parking area surfaces.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.10.1: Consider lowering the allowed percentage of imper-
vious surface per lot for new homes in lakeshore areas, particularly around those lakes where
water quality is in decline.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.10.2: Encourage the installation of pervious paving
surfaces in the City’s development ordinances and develop or provide existing educational
material about proper installation and maintenance.
NR Policy 2.11: Manage water quantity by continuing to protect Scandia’s floodways and flood
fringe areas as critical infrastructure mitigating flood risk.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.11.1: Continue to enforce Scandia’s floodplain regulations.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.11.2: Work with DNR and FEMA to update floodplain
maps and zones in order to reflect changes in watershed development patterns and storm
intensity.
Goals, Policies and Strategies
NR Goal 3: Preserve and protect the quantity and quality of groundwater.
NR Policy 3.1: In keeping with its general rural character, Scandia plans to continue relying primar-
ily on individual on-site water systems to serve both existing and future development.
NR Policy 3.2: Identify sensitive groundwater recharge areas and groundwater dependent natural
resources and use this information to guide development; Limit contaminant generating land use
activities to areas where the potential to contaminate groundwater is low.
NR Implementation Strategy 3.2.1: Provide educational materials to residents about how
to avoid damage to groundwater resources when using household chemicals in Individual
Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS).
NR Implementation Strategy 3.2.2: The City will develop and adopt performance stan-
dards for contaminant generating land use activities such as fuel storage and animal agricul-
ture in areas with the potential to contaminate groundwater.
NR Policy 3.3: Promote water conservation.
NR Implementation Strategy 3.3.1: The City will develop education programs that en-
courage water users to practice water conservation techniques.
NR Implementation Strategy 3.3.2: The City will implement water conservation practices
in city-owned buildings.
Water Supply and Groundwater Management Goals & Policies
Natural Resources
125Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and Strategies
NR Policy 3.4: Require developers to restore the ability of soils to absorb, retain, and infiltrate
water following site development through the use of practices such as compost amendments and soil
ripping.
NR Implementation Strategy 3.4.1: The City will develop and adopt an ordinance that
requires developers to restore soils compacted during site development through the use of
practices such as compost amendments and soil ripping.
NR Implementation Strategy 3.4.2: The City will encourage local refuse haulers to
develop curbside collection of materials that can be composted (both household and yard
waste) to create a local supply of compost.
NR Policy 3.5: Encourage the use of stormwater management techniques on developed sites that
filter and infiltrate stormwater runoff to help recharge groundwater systems. (Related to NR 2.5
and 2.6)
NR Implementation Strategy 3.5.1: The City will provide educational materials to resi-
dents and businesses regarding stormwater management techniques that filter and infiltrate
stormwater runoff to help recharge groundwater systems.
NR Implementation Strategy 3.5.2: The City will consider incentives such as tax breaks
or cost-share programs for landowners who install stormwater management techniques that
filter and infiltrate stormwater runoff to help recharge groundwater systems.
NR Policy 3.6: Promote the use of native species that do not require irrigation in order to reduce
groundwater use.
NR Implementation Strategy 3.6.1: The City will provide educational materials to resi-
dents and businesses on utilizing native plants in their landscaping.
NR Implementation Strategy 3.6.2: The City will demonstrate a commitment to the use
of native plants by making use of them in landscaping on City-owned property.
NR Implementation Strategy 3.6.3: The City will continue to require native plants in
landscaping for new developments.
NR Goal 4: To retain the rural character of Scandia and protect natural resources, maintain large, connected
areas of open space, rather than small, fragmented natural areas.
NR Policy 4.1: Scandia will continue to coordinate with both the Minnesota Department of Natu-
ral Resources and Washington County on plans for the long term acquisition and development of
William O’Brien State Park and Big Marine Park Reserve.
NR Policy 4.2: Encourage development proposals to consider the context of natural areas on the
site and preserve natural areas that connect to off-site natural areas.
NR Implementation Strategy 4.2.1: The City will use the natural resource priorities map
and the 2006 Open Space Plan map to identify large, connected natural systems and will
encourage and investigate various options for the protection of these areas.
NR Implementation Strategy 4.2.2: The City will develop and adopt an ordinance requir-
ing all development to utilize low-impact techniques.
Natural Areas Goals & Policies
Natural Resources
126 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and Strategies
NR Goal 5: Preserve high quality natural areas and enhance degraded areas.
NR Policy 5.1: Work with property owners, other governmental units and agencies, and developers
to protect high quality natural areas identified on the natural resource priorities map.
NR Implementation Strategy 5.1.1: The City will work with Washington County and
other partners to develop a land acquisition program for high quality areas identified on the
natural resource priorities map.
NR Implementation Strategy 5.1.2: The City will develop and adopt an ordinance requir-
ing all development to utilize low-impact techniques.
NR Implementation Strategy 5.1.3: The City will investigate the concept of Transfer of
Development Rights (TDR) as a means of compensating landowners who give up develop-
ment rights in order to meet community goals of agricultural preservation, natural resource
protection, and life-cycle and affordable housing. The City will establish a study committee
to evaluate the use of TDR and report conclusions to the City Council within one year after
adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. (See related LU Policy 1.2)
NR Implementation Strategy 5.1.4: The City will investigate a Purchase of Development
Rights (PDR) program to obtain conservation easements for lands with high preservation
value.
NR Policy 5.2: Require development proposals to identify and protect high quality natural areas to
the greatest extent possible.
NR Implementation Strategy 5.2.1: The City will continue to use its Open Space Conser-
vation Subdivision Ordinance to require use of low-impact techniques.
NR Policy 5.3: Encourage the restoration of indigenous plant communities and wildlife habitat in
all private and public developments.
NR Implementation Strategy 5.3.1: The City may consider incentives like tax breaks, den-
sity bonuses, or cost-share programs for developers and land owners who restore indigenous
plant communities and wildlife habitat.
NR Goal 6: Protect and preserve native, endangered, threatened and unique plants and animals.
NR Policy 6.1: The City will review development proposals to ensure minimal impacts on rare plant
and animal species.
NR Implementation Strategy 6.1.1: The City will develop and adopt an ordinance requir-
ing all development to utilize low-impact techniques.
NR Implementation Strategy 6.1.2: The City will coordinate with the DNR on the review
of developments with potential locations of rare plant and animal species.
NR Implementation Strategy 6.1.3: The City will use MLCCS criteria for requiring inven-
tories as part of the development process.
NR Policy 6.2: Strive to connect high quality natural areas through natural corridors on public or
private land in order to allow for wildlife movement among habitats.
Natural Resources
127Scandia Comprehensive Plan
NR Implementation Strategy 6.2.1: The City will develop and adopt a corridor assess-
ment that identifies key connections between existing high quality natural areas.
NR Implementation Strategy 6.2.2: The City will encourage developers to use the natural
resource corridor assessment map to identify and protect key connections between natural
systems.
NR Goal 7: Eliminate, reduce or mitigate the negative effects of invasive species on natural areas.
NR Policy 7.1: Encourage public and private development to landscape with noninvasive, native
species.
NR Implementation Strategy 7.1.1: The City will consider incentives like tax breaks,
density bonuses, or cost-share programs for developers and land owners who utilize native
plants in their landscaping. (See related NR Policy 3.6)
NR Implementation Strategy 7.1.2: The City will demonstrate a commitment to the use
of native plants continuing to require native landscaping on City-owned property.
NR Implementation Strategy 7.1.3: Encourage local nurseries to promote native species
by clearly marking them or providing flyers to buyers. Work with local nurseries to provide
educational programs on native landscaping that protects surface water and groundwater.
NR Policy 7.2: Promote public awareness about the potential impacts of invasive species.
NR Implementation Strategy 7.2.1: The City will provide educational materials to resi-
dents on the environmental, economic, and social impacts of invasive species.
NR Implementation Strategy 7.2.2: The City will teach the public how to prevent the
transportation of invasive species from one land and water habitat to another.
NR Implementation Strategy 7.2.3: The City will work with the Washington Conserva-
tion District, the DNR, and other agencies to promote existing invasive species education
efforts (such as the DNR’s Invasive Species Program) within City boundaries.
NR Implementation Strategy 7.2.4: The City will encourage removal of invasive and
exotic plants and animal species.
Goals, Policies and StrategiesNatural Resources
128 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and Strategies
The community of Scandia has shown a consistently high level of commitment to preserv-
ing its rural character, as expressed in the 1998 Comprehensive Plan and continuing through
its transition from township to City. The policies in this section, therefore, continue to build
upon this commitment, while accommodating a reasonable amount of new development
that is compatible with the City’s natural resources and rural and small-town character. The
general goal and policies below are followed by goals and policies that pertain to each of the
future land use areas shown in Map 27 - Future Land Use Areas.
Land Use
General Goals and Policies
LU Goal 1: Maintain the City’s unique rural and small-town character and its natural landscape while ac-
commodating a reasonable amount of new development that contributes to, rather than detracts from, that
character.
LU Policy 1.1: Establish standards to ensure that new development responds to the surrounding
landscape and preserves scenic, historic and natural resources wherever possible.
LU Implementation Strategy 1.1.1: Modify existing zoning districts and create new zoning
districts that are compatible with the preferred mix of land uses described in each Compre-
hensive Plan future land use areas.
LU Implementation Strategy 1.1.2: Explore the feasibility of initiating historic preserva-
tion efforts that would encourage the preservation of historic buildings, such as a revolving
grant or loan program for façade improvements.
LU Implementation Strategy 1.1.3: Work with Washington County Historical Society and
Gammelgarden to provide educational materials to residents about the City’s historic build-
ings and sites, using techniques such as seasonal tours of buildings in the village center or
awards for exemplary renovations.
LU Implementation Strategy 1.1.4: Encourage preserving historic landmark buildings -
such as barns, village center structures, historic log homes - starting with an inventory and
developing program criteria to identify structures.
LU Policy 1.2: Investigate the concept of Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) as a means of
compensating landowners who are asked to give up development rights in order to meet community
goals of agricultural preservation, natural resource protection, and life-cycle and affordable housing.
LU Implementation Strategy 1.2.1: Establish a study committee to evaluate the use of
TDR and report conclusions to the City Council within one year after adoption of the Com-
prehensive Plan.
LU Policy 1.3: Establish standards that protect Scandia’s scenic views by minimizing the visual
impact of new development.
LU Implementation Strategy 1.3.1: Continue developing the City’s inventory of scenic
resources – scenic roads and viewsheds – using GIS methodology and the Visual Quality
Analysis procedure. Use the scenic inventory for regulatory purposes, design review, and
to provide educational materials to residents and landowners about the quality of these
resources. Work with landowners prior to development to develop site-by-site strategies for
protecting scenic resources.
129Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and Strategies
LU Implementation Strategy 1.3.2: Require landscaping along major collector roads to
minimize visual impact of new development.
LU Policy 1.4: Emphasize sensitivity to community character in new development and redevel-
opment, whether that character is expressed by historic buildings, agricultural views and activities,
natural resource, scenic views, dark skies, a quiet setting, or other elements that are important to the
City’s residents.
LU Implementation Strategy 1.4.1: To protect Scandia’s community character, develop
standards or guidelines for the design of new development and redevelopment are needed.
LU Policy 1.5: Support agriculture as a basic economic activity in the City of Scandia by supporting
the right to farm over other land uses in land use areas where agriculture is a primary use.
LU Implementation Strategy 1.5.1: Create programs to inform new landowners about
potential impacts of living in agricultural areas.
LU Goal 2: Reinforce the village center as the social and economic focal point of the community.
LU Policy 2.1: Encourage commercial, office, limited industrial, residential, institutional and civic
uses that complement existing uses and use patterns.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.1.1: Create a new Village Mixed Use (VMU) zoning
district that emphasizes retail, commercial, and light industrial uses. Establish densities
consistent with existing lot sizes. Lot sizes will also depend on the availability of community
wastewater facilities.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.1.2: Establish design standards and guidelines to ensure
that new commercial buildings reflect “downtown” character in their size, massing, setbacks,
and other attributes. Promote the use of guidelines for new buildings to encourage architec-
tural design that is compatible with its surroundings.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.1.3: Establish design standards to improve the quality and
appearance of light industrial development in the village center.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.1.4: Consider the VMU district as a receiving zone for a
possible Transfer of Development Rights program. (See LU Policy 1.2)
LU Policy 2.2: Provide for easy pedestrian movement in the village center and connections to sur-
rounding areas.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.2.1: Plan for sidewalks or pedestrian pathways along all
existing and new streets within the village center, and consider developing pedestrian con-
nections where streets cannot connect neighborhoods with the village center.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.2.2: Plan for new street connections between the village
center and nearby areas. (See Map 31 - Planned Village Transportation Improvements)
LU Policy 2.3: Create an enhanced and economically healthy village center.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.3.1: Consider the feasibility of extending centralized
wastewater treatment to serve the village area.
Village Mixed-Use Goal and Policies
Land Use
130 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and Strategies
LU Implementation Strategy 2.3.2: Provide for new commercial development adjacent to
existing commercial areas in land use regulation.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.3.3: Consider regulatory and financial incentives for pro-
grams to encourage existing building owners to make changes to meet design standards for
the preservation, adaptive reuse, and design improvement of existing traditional structures.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.3.4: Continue to focus public and civic facilities and
activities within the village center (with the exception of parks and trails which may occur in
any area).
LU Policy 2.4: Encourage tourism and recreation businesses in the village area.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.4.1: Bring the Gateway Trail extension to the village area.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.4.2: Create pedestrian and bicycle connections through
the village area, centering on the village core area.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.4.3: Consider lodging land uses that fit the character of
the village and can be developed consistent with planned infrastructure capacity.
LU Goal 3: Establish growth areas surrounding the Village Center, intended to support primarily single and
multiple family residential uses on lot sizes reflective of the existing village lot sizes.
LU Policy 3.1: Encourage single- and multiple-family residential uses that are compatible with adja-
cent land uses and use patterns in the village center and reflect the character of the village area.
LU Implementation Strategy 3.1.1: Create a new Village Neighborhood zoning district
that emphasizes residential lands uses on small lots. The density and minimum lot size of
the Village Neighborhood areas will be 1 dwelling unit per 2.5 acres. Bonus densities up to
1 dwelling unit per acre may be earned as an incentive for providing multi-family or life-cycle
housing or use of Transfer of Development Rights.
LU Implementation Strategy 3.1.2: Establish design standards and guidelines to ensure
that new residential buildings are compatible with existing historic buildings in terms of
building height and massing, placement on the lot, and garage and driveway placement.
LU Implementation Strategy 3.1.3: Consider the Village Neighborhood district as a re-
ceiving area for a possible Transfer of Development Rights program. (See LU Policy 1.2)
LU Policy 3.2: Provide an integrated, internally-connected street system connecting village neigh-
borhood to the village center.
LU Implementation Strategy 3.2.1: Develop street and pedestrian path standards for new
development that avoids cul-de-sac development and provides for pedestrian connections to
the village center.
LU Policy 3.3: Encourage development of new neighborhoods that relate to their natural setting.
LU Implementation Strategy 3.3.1: Provide pedestrian access to parks and trails and
community destinations.
LU Implementation Strategy 3.3.2: Consider conservation performance standards to
protect natural features in and near the village center.
Village Neighborhood Goal and Policies
Land Use
131Scandia Comprehensive Plan
LU Implementation Strategy 3.3.3: Consider landscaping standards for new development
along the public right-of-way.
LU Goal 4.1: Ensure that natural resources are taken into account prior to any land use decisions.
LU Policy 4.1: Establish minimum protection standards for priority natural resources.
LU Implementation Strategy 4.1.1: Create performance standards for priority natural
features identified in Scandia’s Natural Resource priorities maps and component maps.
LU Goal 4.2: Protect natural resources through performance and site design standards while allowing an
appropriate level of development.
LU Policy 4.2: Encourage the use of Open Space Conservation Subdivision, Transfer of Develop-
ment Rights or low-impact development standards to protect and enhance natural resources.
LU Implementation Strategy 4.2.1: Establish a study committee to evaluate the use of
TDR for achieving agricultural preservation, natural resource protection, and life-cycle and
affordable housing goals. Report back to City Council with recommendations within one
year after the adoption of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. (See LU Policy 1.2)
LU Implementation Strategy 4.2.2: Adopt low-impact development performance
standards.
LU Goal 5: Recognize, protect and encourage agricultural production as a viable long-term land use.
LU Policy 5.1: Encourage a variety of agricultural operations, including small-scale metropolitan-
oriented agriculture, value-added production, and small-scale agricultural-related commercial uses.
LU Implementation Strategy 5.1.1: Create a new Agricultural Core zoning district where
agriculture is the predominant use, but allowing for secondary use when compatible with
agriculture, including low density residential, commercial recreation, and agricultural-related
commercial. Establish densities of 4 units per 40 acres. Within the 4 per 40 density limit,
a variety of lot sizes will be encouraged in the manner of the current lot averaging zoning:
lots of 2 to 5 acres in size or 20 acres or greater would be allowed. Bonus densities of up to
75% of the base density may be earned only if developers use the Open Space Conservation
Subdivision process and undertake actions such as permanent protection of agricultural land
or open space, or protection or enhancement of natural resources.
LU Implementation Strategy 5.1.2: Provide educational materials to current and prospec-
tive residents about quality-of-life issues such as noise and odors that can be expected in
proximity to agricultural operations.
LU Implementation Strategy 5.1.3: Investigate the feasibility of small-scale programs to
assist agricultural producers and promote Scandia as an agricultural-friendly community. For
example, programs matching farmers wishing to rent land for cultivation with landowners or
Natural Resource Protection Area Goals and Policies
Goals, Policies and Strategies
Agricultural Core Area Goals and Policies
Land Use
132 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and Strategies
homeowners associations with available land, or programs offering seasonal tours of farms
and farm-related enterprises.
LU Policy 5.2: Encourage Transfer of Development Rights out of Agricultural Core areas as a
means of realizing a portion of the development value of land while keeping it in agricultural pro-
duction. (See LU Policy 1.2)
LU Implementation Strategy 5.2.1: Establish a study committee to evaluate the use of
TDR for achieving agricultural preservation, natural resource protection, and life-cycle and
affordable housing goals. Report back to City Council with recommendations within one
year after the adoption of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan.
LU Policy 5.3: When siting new structures, roads or drives, consider how best to preserve the vi-
ability of agricultural operations.
LU Implementation Strategy 5.3.1: Develop standards for Open Space Conservation
Subdivisions that are specific to agricultural protection.
LU Policy 5.4: Encourage participation in the Agricultural Preserves Program.
LU Implementation Strategy 5.4.1: Create an agricultural preserves overlay district to
encourage continued or expanded agricultural land uses in the agricultural core future land
use area and the general rural future land use area.
LU Implementation Strategy 5.4.2: Promote the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves
Program as a voluntary means for land owners in the agricultural core and general rural areas
to meet community character and stewardship goals. (See ED Implementation Strategy
4.3.2)
LU Goal 6: Provide for a wide range of land uses that are able to coexist within a rural setting, including
traditional and specialty agriculture, horse and hobby farms, limited raising of animals, market gardening, and
limited residential development and institutional use.
LU Policy 6.1: Allow a broader mix of compatible rural land uses than in the agricultural core land
use area.
LU Implementation Strategy 6.1.1: Create a new general rural zoning district that com-
bines both agricultural production and single-family residential uses, along with parks, com-
mercial recreation, and similar rural uses. Allow a density of 4 dwelling units per 40 acres
with a minimum allowed lot size of 2 acres (lot averaging is not required).
LU Implementation Strategy 6.1.2: Limit use of smaller lots for inappropriate activities
that have noise and other nuisance impacts on surrounding areas.
LU Policy 6.2: Require development to protect natural features.
LU Implementation Strategy 6.2.1: Develop standards for Open Space Conservation
Subdivisions that protect priority natural features in General Rural areas as identified within
Scandia’s Natural Resource Protection Areas overlay. Bonus densities of up to 75% of the
base density may be earned only if developers use the Open Space Conservation Subdivision
process and undertake actions such as protection or enhancement of natural resources, or
permanent protection of agricultural land or open space.
Land Use
General Rural Area Goal and Policies
133Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and Strategies
LU Implementation Strategy 6.2.2: When siting new buildings or drives, encourage
and incorporate protection or screening of scenic views from roads into design standards.
Use the City’s inventory of scenic resources for regulatory purposes, design review, and to
educate residents and landowners about the quality of these resources. Work with landown-
ers prior to development to develop site-by-site strategies for protecting scenic resources.
Require landscaping or screening requirements along major roadways encouraging the use of
native vegetation.
LU Goal 7: Within a 4 dwelling units per 40 acre density limit encourage a mix of lot sizes with a minimum
lot size of 2 acres.
LU Policy 7.1: Allow for limited infill of large lot residential areas.
LU Implementation Strategy 7.1.1: Consider the General Rural land use area as a receiv-
ing area for a Transfer of Development Rights program. (See LU Policy 1.2)
LU Policy 7.2: Encourage connection of existing higher density (5 acre lot) neighborhoods via
streets and trails to nearby neighborhoods, parks, and other community destinations.
LU Implementation Strategy 7.2.1: Require non-motorized travel connections in new
development to other neighborhoods, parks, or schools.
LU Goal 8: Maintain the established pattern of small-lot residential development in lakeshore areas while
improving stormwater management and land stewardship practices.
LU Policy 8.1: Apply shoreland management standards that allow the continuation of established
development patterns without extending those patterns into undeveloped areas.
LU Implementation Strategy 8.1.1: Create a new zoning overlay or district allowing tradi-
tional density and form of lakeshore development.
LU Policy 8.2: Avoid any increase in runoff or other potential adverse impacts on water quality.
LU Implementation Strategy 8.2.1: Require new development or redevelopment to use
low-impact development techniques.
LU Implementation Strategy 8.2.2: Create incentives for owners of existing developed
shoreland to create buffers and rain gardens.
LU Implementation Strategy 8.2.3: Encourage local nurseries to work with the Washing-
ton Conservation District to offer classes on buffers and rain gardens.
LU Policy 8.3: Encourage the protection and enhancement of shoreland vegetation as a means of
improving lake water quality.
LU Implementation Strategy 8.3.1: Consider pro-active means of protecting sensitive
areas, including Purchase of Development Rights programs and participation in DNR and
watershed district shoreline restoration programs.
LU Implementation Strategy 8.3.2: Initiate programs to improve stormwater manage-
ment in shoreland areas.
Lakeshore Traditional Area Goal and Policies
Land Use
134 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
LU Goal 9: Protect the resources of those lakeshore areas that remain in a relatively natural state, in agricul-
tural uses, or are developed with lots that meet current shoreland standards, while allowing limited develop-
ment where appropriate.
LU Policy 9.1: Require new development in lakeshore conservation areas to protect water quality,
natural resources on the site, and scenic qualities from the lake and surrounding areas.
LU Implementation Strategy 9.1.1: Create a new zoning district or overlay to restrict den-
sity and set design standards that protect natural resources and systems.
LU Implementation Strategy 9.1.2: Encourage Open Space Conservation Subdivisions
that use low-impact development techniques to protect and enhance high quality natural
areas identified on Scandia’s Natural Resource Protection Areas overlay.
LU Policy 9.2: Encourage the protection and enhancement of shoreland natural areas as a means
of improving lake water quality.
LU Implementation Strategy 9.2.1: Consider creating or participating in an existing Pur-
chase of Development Rights program to permanently protect undeveloped sensitive natural
areas in shoreland areas.
LU Implementation Strategy 9.2.2: Consider restoration requirements for degraded natu-
ral areas in the zoning district or overlay development standards.
LU Goal 10: Protect the natural and scenic resources of the St. Croix River Corridor, both within and
adjacent to the St. Croix National Scenic Riverway, while allowing traditional residential and recreational use
patterns to continue.
LU Policy 10.1: Continue to apply Washington County development standards that limit the density,
location and appearance of new development, until adoption of standards by City.
LU Implementation Strategy 10.1.1: Revise the St. Croix River ordinance to be specific to
the City’s needs and interests, including protection of scenic views of the river and encour-
agement of visual or physical access in appropriate locations.
LU Policy 10.2: Work with river corridor residents, the National Park Service and scenic river inter-
est groups to increase City-wide awareness and stewardship of the area’s resources.
LU Implementation Strategy 10.2.1: Follow the recommendations of the Parks, Trails,
Recreation and Open Space Plan to improve access, increase visibility, and improve
stewardship.
LU Policy 10.3: Improve visual access to the river corridor where potential overlooks or viewpoints
exist, while avoiding damage to sensitive resources.
LU Implementation Strategy 10.3.1: Continue developing the City’s inventory of scenic
resources – scenic roads and viewshed – using GIS methodology and the Visual Quality
Analysis procedure. Use this information in regulatory standards and design review, and to
Lakeshore Conservation Area Goal and Policies
Goals, Policies and Strategies
St. Croix River Corridor Goal and Policies
Land Use
135Scandia Comprehensive Plan
educate residents and landowners about the quality of these resources. (See LU Implemen-
tation Strategies 1.3.1 and 14.2.1)
LU Policy 10.4: Improve physical access to the river corridor where public lands may provide access
opportunities (see also Parks and Trails policies).
LU Goal 11: Recognize the value of the City’s historic rural commercial areas and crossroads stores.
LU Policy 11.1: Allow for the continuation and expansion of rural commercial areas with new
small-scale commercial uses.
LU Implementation Strategy 11.1.1: Create a new zoning district for the Rural Commer-
cial Nodes shown on the Future Land Use Map that would encourage businesses that serve
visitors and users of the City’s recreational assets. Establish a 2-acre minimum lot size for
commercial development and residential densities consistent with on-site septic systems.
LU Policy 11.2: Encourage additional commercial and service businesses where commercial uses
existed historically and continue to be maintained, but not in other areas of the City.
LU Implementation Strategy 11.2.1: Establish design standards to ensure that new com-
mercial buildings reflect the historic character of their surroundings in their size, massing,
setbacks and other attributes.
LU Policy 11.3: Manage parking and pedestrian circulation in historic hamlets to calm traffic and
encourage walking and biking.
LU Implementation Strategy 11.3.1: Improve pedestrian crossings, consider installation
of sidewalks and walkways in defined areas, and work with businesses to improve signage for
parking areas, paths and trails.
LU Goal 12: Recognize and enhance publicly-owned lands and other lands permanently protected from
development and improve public access to such lands where appropriate.
LU Policy 12.1: Establish standards or guidelines for the protection of scenic and natural resources
within and adjacent to protected recreation areas, and for public access to recreation areas.
LU Implementation Strategy 12.1.1: Consider participating in an existing Purchase of
Development Rights program or creating a new program to permanently protect high prior-
ity sites on the Natural Resources Overlay or those identified as park search areas.
LU Implementation Strategy 12.1.2: Use Park Dedication requirements to protect scenic
or natural resources.
LU Implementation Strategy 12.1.3: Establish partnerships with county, state, and federal
agencies and private land protection organizations for the management, protection and en-
hancement of protected recreation areas.
LU Policy 12.2: Encourage compatible management and protection of resources on privately-
owned lands adjacent to recreation areas.
Goals, Policies and Strategies
Rural Commercial Areas Goals and Policies
Protected Recreation Area Goal and Policies
Land Use
136 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
LU Implementation Strategy 12.2.1: Consider purchasing conservation easements from
willing landowners to meet management goals.
LU Implementation Strategy 12.2.2: Create development standards that require a buffer
for new development that is adjacent to recreation areas.
LU Goal 13: Allow for the safe and orderly extraction of aggregate resources now and in the future while
protecting sensitive resources on or near those properties and providing for transitions to other uses when
resource extraction is complete. Mining is limited to existing locations.
LU Policy 13.1: Implement performance standards for the management of existing mining opera-
tions in order to minimize or prevent negative impacts to resources and nearby land uses.
LU Implementation Strategy 13.1.1: The City will continue to implement its Aggregate
Resource Ordinance, which governs the relationship between mining operations and existing
and proposed developments.
LU Policy 13.2: Prior to granting approvals, require reclamation plans for all extraction sites that
require restoration to pre-extraction natural vegetation.
LU Implementation Strategy 13.2.1: The City will continue to implement ordinance pro-
visions requiring extraction sites to have a reclamation plan indicating how mined lands will
be restored to a safe, attractive, and usable condition with native vegetation after the extrac-
tive use has ended.
LU Policy 13.3: Manage proposed development that may conflict with active aggregate extraction.
LU Implementation Strategy 13.3.1: The City will continue to use its Aggregate Resource
Ordinance to govern the relationship between mining operations and existing and proposed
developments.
LU Goal 14: Protect scenic rural roads, viewpoints and vistas identified through the planning process from
visually intrusive or incompatible development.
LU Policy 14.1: Establish context-sensitive roadway design standards that will protect the narrow
and heavily wooded character of identified low-traffic roadways.
LU Implementation Strategy 14.1.1: Modify street standards to maintain the visual quali-
ties of identified scenic roads, including allowing a narrower right-of-way and protection of
vegetation within that right-of-way.
LU Policy 14.2: Establish viewshed protection overlay standards that will maintain the scenic quality
of significant views throughout the City.
LU Implementation Strategy 14.2.1: Continue developing the City’s inventory of scenic
resources – scenic roads and viewsheds – using GIS methodology and the Visual Quality
Analysis procedure.
Goals, Policies and Strategies
Mining – Resource Extraction Goal and Policies
Scenic Roads Goal and Policies
Land Use
137Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and Strategies
LU Policy 14.3: Work with landowners to establish desirable development patterns that will protect
important viewsheds, through appropriate siting of buildings and roads and screening with native
vegetation and landforms.
LU Implementation Strategy 14.3.1: Consider creating a scenic overlay district that modi-
fies setback, screening and landscaping, and building placement for new development to
ensure that community character is maintained.
Land Use
138 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and Strategies
H Goal 1: The City of Scandia will expand life-cycle housing opportunities for residents at all points in life.
H Policy 1.1: The City will create opportunities to develop housing on smaller lots and to develop
two-family and multi-family housing within the village center.
H Implementation Strategy 1.1.1: Create a village zoning district allowing smaller lots
when community wastewater systems are available.
H Implementation Strategy 1.1.2: Investigate opportunities and costs for expanding exist-
ing community wastewater or creating new community systems.
H Policy 1.2: The City will continue to work with the Washington County Housing and Redevelop-
ment Authority to identify opportunities for providing additional affordable senior housing in the
village center.
H Implementation Strategy 1.2.1: Work with the County HRA to identify market ab-
sorption rates for senior housing, amenities that will sustain senior housing, and financing
opportunities for new senior housing development.
H Implementation Strategy 1.2.2: Identify village areas suitable for higher density afford-
able senior housing within zoning regulations.
H Policy 1.3: In cooperation with Washington County, the City will continue to monitor the gen-
eral condition of the housing stock, with a special focus on the tenure characteristics of the older
housing.
H Implementation Strategy 1.3.1: Create indicators for tracking housing conditions, turn-
over rates, and owner/rental characteristics.
H Policy 1.4: Encourage residential buildings to be designed for accessibility in order to meet the
needs of current and future owners.
Housing
Housing Goals and Policies
139Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and Strategies
ES Goal 1: The City encourages the use of renewable, local and diverse forms of energy in order to increase
use of local resources, mitigate the local risk from fossil fuel scarcity and price increases, and help meet Min-
nesota’s climate protection goals.
ES Policy 1.1: Protect solar access for homes and businesses in the subdivision process.
ES Implementation Strategy 1.1.1: Require subdivisions to identify lots with good solar
access and encourage passive solar design.
ES Implementation Strategy 1.1.2: Consider tools such as solar easements to ensure long-
term solar access.
ES Policy 1.2: Promote the use of renewable energy systems on housing and in areas where such
systems can be safely operated and produce a minimum level of visual impact.
ES Implementation Strategy 1.2.1: Identify areas and the performance criteria under
which wind and solar energy systems can be installed with minimal impact on Scandia’s
landscape, natural viewshed corridors, and neighborhoods and prohibit more restrictive
covenants.
ES Implementation Strategy 1.2.2: Permit small wind energy systems, designed to serve
primarily on-site needs, in Agricultural Core and General Rural future land use areas so the
system does not detract from designated protected viewsheds. Restrict wind energy installa-
tions in the St. Croix River corridor.
ES Implementation Strategy 1.2.3: Designate districts where wind energy systems are
permitted or conditional.
ES Policy 1.3: Encourage energy efficient housing, exceeding the minimum efficiency levels re-
quired in the State building code, in order to promote housing that is more affordable, put less strain
on electric distribution systems, and contribute to Minnesota climate protection efforts.
ES Implementation Strategy 1.3.1: Consider working with utility, state agency, and other
entities on their efforts to educate about and provide incentive for energy efficiency.
ES Policy 1.4: Encourage appropriate use of alternative renewable heating fuels such as bio-mass
(wood, corn, etc.), and limit nuisances associated with such systems.
ES Implementation Strategy 1.4.1: Consider performance requirements for combustion
efficiency and air emission controls to limit smoke and particulates in the village area.
ES Implementation Strategy 1.4.2: Create standards for fuel storage that limits nuisances.
ES Goal 2: The City recognizes that rural areas face a high risk from transportation fuel price volatility and
will evaluate efforts to lower that risk.
ES Policy 2.1: Encourage the use of alternative fuels and alternative means of transportation for
City residents and businesses.
Energy Use and Systems
Energy Use and Systems Goals and Policies
140 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and Strategies
ES Implementation Strategy 2.1.1: Work with Washington County and the Metropolitan
Council to improve transit access in the village areas (See TR Goal 7).
ES Implementation Strategy 2.1.2: Work with developers, existing land owners, Washing-
ton County, and MnDOT to connect Scandia to regional trail systems and create bicycle trail
connections that can connect people to jobs, goods, and services.
ES Policy 2.2: Consider that housing development markets will be affected by fuel availability and
price when evaluating development proposals and designs.
ES Policy 2.3: Protect local sustainable agricultural production that serves local markets in land use
and transportation decisions.
ES Implementation Strategy 2.3.1: Protect diversified agricultural operations from con-
flicting land uses.
ES Implementation Strategy 2.3.2: Encourage agricultural development that diversifies
the type of products grown in Scandia.
ES Implementation Strategy 2.3.3: Consider applying eco-industrial park concepts to
diversified local agricultural operations.
Energy Use and Systems
141Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and Strategies
ED Goal 1: Strengthen the village center of Scandia as the focal point of economic and community activity.
ED Policy 1.1: Work with village center land and building owners to maintain and upgrade their
building facades and properties consistent with the village’s small town image and historic character.
ED Implementation Strategy 1.1.1: Create architectural design guidelines with examples
to guide facade improvements.
ED Implementation Strategy 1.1.2: Investigate incentive programs such as small grants or
free design assistance to encourage building and property improvement.
ED Policy 1.2: Identify in-fill opportunities and promote new commercial investment that creates
synergy with existing businesses.
ED Implementation Strategy 1.2.1: Work with local banks and economic development
entities to create opportunities for entrepreneurs to use empty or underused commercial
buildings in the village.
ED Implementation Strategy 1.2.2: Consider redevelopment strategies in the village core
to reassemble land and develop buildings that both meet desired design standards and are
attractive to businesses starting, expanding, or relocating to Scandia.
ED Policy 1.3: Continue to encourage public and private investment in community-oriented institu-
tions including the community center and city hall, church, cemeteries, and Gammelgarden.
ED Implementation Strategy 1.3.1: Make investments in new public facilities adjacent to
or connected with the village core area.
ED Policy 1.4: Create land use standards that guide development into the village center and away
from a linear pattern along the highways or undeveloped rural intersections.
ED Implementation Strategy 1.4.1: Restrict new non-agricultural commercial develop-
ment to the village or other designated commercial nodes.
ED Implementation Strategy 1.4.2: Restrict creation or extension of community water or
wastewater infrastructure outside designated commercial areas in the village.
ED Policy 1.5: In the review of new business developments or expansions, require the use of high-
quality materials, building designs that are compatible with the historic character of the area, and
landscaping that restores the natural rural character of the area.
ED Implementation Strategy 1.5.1: Create design standards including architectural and
landscaping standards consistent with a historic design pattern that provides continuity with-
out restricting individuality.
ED Implementation Strategy 1.5.2: Consider forming a design standard advisory
committee to review proposals and make recommendations on design to the Planning
Commission.
Economic Development
Economic Development Goals and Policies
142 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and Strategies
ED Goal 2: Encourage small businesses and entrepreneurs in and around the village center.
ED Policy 2.1: Create land use and zoning standards that encourage businesses with size and struc-
tures appropriate for village center’s building infrastructure.
ED Implementation Strategy 2.1.1: Set maximum size limitations for commercial building
footprints.
ED Implementation Strategy 2.1.2: Investigate standards that discourage formula food
establishments.
ED Implementation Strategy 2.1.3: Prohibit franchise architecture or signage.
ED Policy 2.2: Work with local and area banks to encourage and support entrepreneurs.
ED Implementation Strategy 2.2.1: Identify financial and technical barriers to entrepre-
neurship, coordinate efforts to remove those barriers, and promote Scandia as a place for
entrepreneurs.
ED Policy 2.3: Encourage small niche businesses that serve regional markets.
ED Implementation Strategy 2.3.1: Identify existing niche businesses and create a pro-
motional strategy to expand the visibility (within the larger region) of Scandia Village as a
unique retail or service center.
ED Implementation Strategy 2.3.2: Explore the opportunities to link Scandia and it’s sur-
rounding communities and small direct market agricultural producers to retail and services in
the village center.
ED Implementation Strategy 2.3.3: Strengthen artist communities, arts incubators and
arts as ecological development.
ED Goal 3: Encourage home-based entrepreneurs and businesses.
ED Policy 3.1: Create zoning and land use standards for home-based businesses that support
Scandia’s self-employed households and encourage new home-based business that can function as a
secondary use in residential areas.
ED Implementation Strategy 3.1.1: Identify specific types of home-based businesses that
generate few nuisances and identify these in the zoning district land use tables.
ED Implementation Strategy 3.1.2: Set performance standards such as the number of
customers per day to encourage home-based businesses to transition to a storefront when its
market is adequately developed.
ED Goal 4: Recognize the economic importance of agricultural businesses.
ED Policy 4.1: Encourage new and existing agricultural businesses that take innovative advantage
of Scandia’s agricultural resources, including agricultural tourism, certified local or organic food pro-
duction and processing, and niche or local markets for fiber, fuel, or other agricultural product.
ED Implementation Strategy 4.1.1: Define agricultural uses in zoning regulation to in-
clude the unique mix of agriculture found in Scandia.
Economic Development
143Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and Strategies
ED Implementation Strategy 4.1.2: Create incentives to attract new agricultural produc-
ers that fit a description of being oriented to local markets.
ED Implementation Strategy 4.1.3: Consider agricultural development incentives in tax
structure, development regulations, and economic development programs.
ED Policy 4.2: Set standards for allowing agricultural support businesses in areas where agriculture
is the designated primary or secondary use.
ED Implementation Strategy 4.2.1: Identify types of businesses (specifically businesses
accessory to the primary agricultural activity on a parcel) that support the kind of agriculture
encouraged in Scandia and make them conditional uses.
ED Policy 4.3: Create agricultural protection areas and agricultural protection programs to limit the
impact of development pressure on the economic viability of agricultural practices.
ED Implementation Strategy 4.3.1: Create zoning districts that match the intent of the
agricultural core area, limiting non-agricultural land uses.
ED Implementation Strategy 4.3.2: Continue to encourage land owners to participate in
the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserve Program. (See LU Implementation Strategy 5.4.2)
ED Implementation Strategy 4.3.3: Consider Purchase of Development Rights program
options for proactively protecting key agricultural lands.
ED Implementation Strategy 4.3.4: Evaluate the potential market size for Transfer De-
velopment Rights (TDR) within Scandia.
ED Implementation Strategy 4.3.5: Consider options for multi-jurisdictional TDR
programs.
ED Implementation Strategy 4.3.6: Consider incentive-based TDR programs, for
instance, where subdivisions are given expedited regulatory review or more flexibility for
rezonings or conditional use permits with participation in the TDR program.
ED Implementation Strategy 4.3.7: Consider a “bank” for development rights as part of
a Purchase of Development Rights program.
ED Implementation Strategy 4.3.8: Explore the interest of local agricultural land owners
in participating in the agricultural land trust/cooperative concept now being developed in
the metropolitan area.
Economic Development
144 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and Strategies
The City of Scandia adopted a Parks, Trails, Recreation, and Open Space Plan in 2006. The plan included
five park goals and seven trails goals, with multiple policies or strategies for each goal. The policies identified
both general principles for creating and managing parks and trails and specific recommendations for tools to
achieve park and trail goals. In addition to the goals, policies and strategies, the Park Plan identified specific
improvements to existing parks, search area priorities for new parks, and a general prioritization of the local
needs for different types of parks.
The park and trail goals, policies and strategies of the 2006 Parks, Trails, Recreation, and Open Space Plan are
adopted by reference in this Comprehensive Plan. The goals, without the accompanying policies and strate-
gies, are listed below. The Park goals, Trails goals, and Recreation goals were listed separately in the 2006 Plan
but used largely identical language and have been combined in the first seven of the following goals. Three
additional new goals (8, 9 and 10 below) have been added to support other recommendations of the 2006
Parks, Trails, Recreation, and Open Space Plan and integrate with the rest of the Comprehensive Plan.
PT Goal 1: Develop a park, recreation, and trail system that meets the needs of City residents.
PT Goal 2: Develop a close working relationship with other agencies and groups to enhance the parks and
recreation facilities and develop trails and routes in the City.
PT Goal 3: Design and locate parks, recreation facilities, trails, and routes in a manner that best meet their
purpose.
PT Goal 4: Develop an effective planning approach to developing and maintaining parks and recreation
areas and constructing and maintaining trails and routes.
PT Goal 5: Scandia supports the establishment of a network of public parks and public, multi-use, non-
motorized trails, including the Gateway Trail, which the City Council might establish as part of a program of
providing outdoor recreation amenities and community-wide connections that serve the health and welfare of
the City’s residents.
PT Goal 6: Identify the search area for a trail connection between William O’Brien State Park and Big Ma-
rine Regional Park Reserve.
PT Goal 7: Consider potential trail connection when/if the abandoned Soo Line railway corridor from
White Bear Lake to Wisconsin through the City of Scandia becomes available.
PT Goal 8: Use the four park search areas and five recreational facilities search areas identified in the 2006
Park plan and other natural resource information to guide park acquisition donations and potential site acqui-
sitions when property becomes available.
PT Policy 8.1: Consider limitations on recreation or park amenities suggested by the future land use
areas and Natural Resource Protection Areas overlay.
PT Policy 8.2: Identify new park search areas consistent with the natural resource priority map.
PT Policy 8.3: Identify lakes that should be designated for non-motorized recreation.
Parks and Trails
Parks and Trails Goals
145Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and Strategies
PT Goal 9: Implement the recommendations of the 2006 Parks, Trails, and Open Space Plan for improve-
ments to Scandia’s existing parks and trails.
PT Policy 9.1: Consider the compatibility of suggested park, trail, and recreation improvements
with the primary and secondary land uses surrounding each existing park.
PT Policy 9.2: Provide for connections to possible residential areas, consistent with the land use
map, during implementation of the recommended improvements.
PT Goal 10: Since the adoption of the 2006 Parks, Trails, and Open Space Plan, Scandia has become an
incorporated city and taken a greater responsibility for its own green infrastructure. The City will continue to
work closely with Washington County, the Metropolitan Council, and the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources on more detailed planning efforts to insure that the regional green infrastructure system is de-
signed in a manner compatible with existing and planned development in the City.
PT Policy 10.1: Emphasize the importance of connecting regional trails, particularly the Gateway
Trail, with the village area.
Parks and Trails
The Parks, Trails, Recreation and Open Space Plan identified the following actions as high
priorities for implementation:
1. Develop existing undeveloped parcels as an integral part of Scandia’s Park System for
the benefit of residents and visitors.
2. Evaluate property located in park and/or recreational facility search areas for pur-
chase, lease, or easement to augment the existing Park System, if and when it becomes
available.
3. Continue to identify the Gateway Trail Extension Search Areas. The trail right-of-way
has now been identified from William O’Brien State Park to the village center as shown
on Map 20, Park and Recreation Search Areas.
4. Promote trail connection between Big Marine Park Reserve and William O’Brien State
Park.
5. Develop and install uniform park system signage (to include park, trail, open space and
recreational facility components).
6. Provide pedestrian crosswalk on Olinda Trail North between the Scandia Community
Center and the Gammelgarden/ Barton Johnson Memorial Park.
7. Explore how the immediate needs for athletic fields can be met.
8. Continue development of master plans for all existing parks.
9. Implement the German Lake Management Plan, as per Carnelian-Marine St. Croix Wa-
tershed District (CMSCWD) recommendations.
10. Develop a Landowner Outreach and Stewardship Program, as per CMSCWD
recommendations.
Implementation Recommendations
146 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and Strategies
TR Goal 1: Preserve the through-traffic function of arterial roadways.
TR Policy 1.1: The City of Scandia will work with Washington County and the Minnesota Depart-
ment of Transportation to ensure that a coordinated and efficient thoroughfare system is developed
and maintained consistent with the functional classification system established in this plan.
TR Implementation Strategy 1.1.1: Participate in long-range Washington County Trans-
portation Plan updates; and modify street functional classification map as conditions
warrant.
TR Implementation Strategy 1.1.2: Identify areas where there is potential for new drive-
way access points to interfere with the flow and safe operation of arterial traffic; and work
with property owners to develop alternative access solutions.
TR Policy 1.2: In the review and approval of new subdivisions, the City will coordinate with Wash-
ington County and MnDOT to ensure that new local streets conform to Washington County access
and spacing guidelines.
TR Implementation Strategy 1.2.1: Provide Washington County and MnDOT with timely
opportunity to review and comment on potential subdivisions.
TR Policy 1.3: Unless a development pattern is largely established, the City will prevent or limit
direct driveway access onto arterial and collector roads wherever reasonable alternatives exist.
TR Implementation Strategy 1.3.1: Require development and subdivision applications to
demonstrate that alternatives to direct access (presently or in the future) have been explored.
TR Policy 1.4: The City will develop a system of collector streets and other local streets through
the dedication of necessary right-of-way at the time of subdivision. The City of Scandia designates
future alignments on its transportation plan map, which includes key, but not necessarily all future
local street alignments.
TR Implementation Strategy 1.4.1: Maintain up-to-date subdivision regulations.
TR Implementation Strategy 1.4.2: Identify potential local street alignments in areas that
are likely to experience subdivision in the near future.
TR Implementation Strategy 1.4.3: Maintain up-to-date future local street map.
TR Goal 2: Ensure orderly and scenic rural development through the creation of interconnected local road-
ways that respect the landscape.
TR Policy 2.1: In addition to dedication of rights-of-way for local streets at the time of subdivision,
the City of Scandia will also require right-of-way for demarcation of future street extensions into ad-
joining developable areas, including assurances that such extensions and eventual outlets are feasible
and consistent with comprehensive plan policies.
Transportation
Thoroughfare System Goals and Policies
147Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and StrategiesTransportation
Map 30 - Planned Connections for Discontinuous Streets
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Olinda Tr NManning Tr NScandia Tr N Saint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NLofton Ave N177th St NMayberry Tr N228th St N
220th St N
Old Marine Tr N205th S t N
240th St N
Pil
a
r Rd
N185th St N
230th St N
Nolan Ave N180th St N Oxboro Ave N238th St N
199th St N
Ost
rum Tr N182nd St NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r Quinnell Ave NOrwell Ave NMeadowbrook Ave N218th St N Oldfield Ave N195th St N
Oren Ave N
P
aris
h
R
d
N
188th St N
Keystone Ave NQuentin Ave NPomroy Ave NLomond Tr N Quant Ave NKi
r
k Ave NObrien Tr NLangl
ey Ave N202nd St N
232 nd St N
5th StNorell Ave NCedarcliff Rd
Quality Tr NNovak Ave N2 09 th S t N
Margo Ave NPeabody Tr NParkview La N176th St N Ozark Ave NOland Ave NLofton Ct N
196 th St N
217th St N
2 3 9 th S t N
175th St N
2nd StQuint Ave NPickett Ave NLi
sbon Ave NPerkins Ave NO a kh ill C t N
2 1 4 th S t N
Penrose Ave N240th St N
205th St NOldfield Ave NPomroy Ave NKirk Ave NMeadowbrook Ave N240th St N
2 0 9 t h S t N
230th St N
185th St N
Norell Ave NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Planned Connections for Discontinuous StreetsPlanned Connections for Discontinuous Streets
Planned Connections
Existing Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
Streams
Open Water
City Boundary
Section Lines
Data Sources: MnDOT,
Metropolitan Council,
MN DNR,
City of Scandia
December 16, 2008
148 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and Strategies
TR Implementation Strategy 2.1.1: Require that development applications include infor-
mation on development conditions in adjoining areas; and include Right Of Way and/or
street stubs that support connection to orderly development of adjacent property.
TR Implementation Strategy 2.1.2: Change subdivision regulations to require developers
to construct and pave streets to the border of the development.
TR Policy 2.2: The City of Scandia will prevent the creation of permanently long streets with only
a single access point (i.e., dead-end streets, looping streets and elongated cul-de-sacs).
TR Implementation Strategy 2.2.1: Incorporate/maintain subdivision performance stan-
dards rather than length limits.
TR Policy 2.3: The City of Scandia will require that new roadways are carefully aligned to preserve
views and scenic qualities, accompanied by careful location of building sites, with modification of
setbacks and provision of landscaping to screen structures.
TR Implementation Strategy 2.3.1: Incorporate/maintain subdivision performance stan-
dards that preserve views and scenic qualities.
TR Policy 2.4: The City of Scandia will identify, designate and map future street alignments that
connect existing discontinuous streets (see Map 30 - Planned Connections for Discontinuous Streets).
TR Implementation Strategy 2.4.1: Use consultants, staff resources, and/or develop
working committees to prioritize problem and opportunity areas for developing future align-
ments to connect existing discontinuous streets.
TR Goal 3: Maintain Scandia’s system of local roadways.
TR Policy 3.1: Keep Scandia’s hard surface roadways in good repair with timely maintenance and
investment.
TR Implementation Strategy 3.1.1: Develop a capital improvement plan based on the
Pavement Management Study and other City priorities and financial constraints.
TR Implementation Strategy 3.1.2: Update the Pavement Management Study periodically
to keep the capital improvement plan consistent with needs.
TR Goal 4: Strengthen the Scandia Village Center through new local street connections and access policies.
TR Policy 4.1: The City of Scandia will not support rezonings and site plans that result in additional
strip commercial uses with primary access along TH 97/Scandia Trail.
TR Implementation Strategy 4.1.1: Maintain zoning map consistency with comprehensive
plan policies.
TR Implementation Strategy 4.1.2: Require that development plans/subdivision plans
accompany requests for rezoning.
Local Street Maintenance Goals and Policies
Village Center Street Goals and Policies
Transportation
149Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and Strategies
TR Policy 4.2: The City of Scandia requires that new residential and commercial development in
the Village Center area should be oriented toward Oak Hill Road, Ozark Road, and Olinda Trail
rather than TH 97/Scandia Trail.
TR Implementation Strategy 4.2.2: Continue to require that land subdivision, rezoning,
and site plans be consistent with the comprehensive plan.
TR Policy 4.3: Though the subdivision and development review process, the City of Scandia will
preserve options for future street connections that connect the existing business park along Ozark
Court to the core of the Village Center/Community Center area, and which provide improved access
to the southeast section of the City for emergency vehicles (as shown in Map 31 - Planned Village
Transportation Improvements).
TR Implementation Strategy 4.3.1: Communicate with property owners about the goals
and objectives for new street connections.
TR Implementation Strategy 4.3.2: Develop an understanding of shared responsibility
for costs of new roadway connections (e.g., developer vis-à-vis existing property owner vis-
à-vis the City of Scandia).
TR Goal 5: Develop a system of bike- and pedestrian-friendly streets to complement recreational trails.
TR Policy 5.1: The City of Scandia will coordinate with Washington County to develop a system of
safe and continuous bike shoulder routes along the major roadways in Scandia.
TR Implementation Strategy 5.1.1: Ensure the safety and comfort of the bicyclist in the
design and maintenance of shoulders on collector streets.
TR Policy 5.2: The City will seek to improve the pedestrian friendly character of the Village Center
through the inclusion of sidewalk improvements when roadways are upgraded and the provision of
sidewalks and/or trails linking new residential areas to the commercial center, parks and elementary
school.
TR Implementation Strategy 5.2.1: Maintain subdivision regulations that support this
policy.
TR Goal 6: Preserve the safety of regional air traffic.
TR Policy 6.1: It is the policy of the City of Scandia to notify Mn/DOT Aeronautics of any struc-
ture of a height of two hundred feet (200’) above the ground that could affect airspace; and address
both Federal and State safety standards when planning the design of any object related to or affecting
navigable airspace.
TR Implementation Strategy 6.1.1: Develop administrative procedures to ensure this
policy is implemented.
Bicycling/Pedestrian Goals and Policies
Transportation
Aviation Goal and Policy
150 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and StrategiesTransportation
Map 31 - Planned Village Transportation Improvements
?øA@
OLINDA TRL NSCANDIA TRL N
O
A
K
H
I
L
L
R
D
N
2 0 5 T H S T N PARRISH RD NOREN AVE NOZARK AVE NO LAND AVE N
OSTRUM AVE NOA
K
H
I
L
L
R
D
N
SCANDIA TRL N
City of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 500 1,000250
Feet
Planned Village Transportation ImprovementsPlanned Village Transportation Improvements
Existing Right of Way
Proposed Non-Motorized Connection
Proposed Right of Way (60')
Proposed Roadway Surfacing (36')
Proposed Centerline
Parcels
Data Sources:
URS, MN DNR
June 1, 2008
151Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and Strategies
The City of Scandia is identified by the Metropolitan Council as area where regular transit is not cost-effec-
tive due to low densities.
TR Goal 7: Support the development of regional and local transit options.
TR Policy 7.1: The City will support efforts related to service development of the Forest Lake
Transit Center as well as the Rush Line Corridor for commuter rail service.
TR Implementation Strategy 7.1.1: Promote transit and other ridesharing options in City
publications and at City Hall.
TR Implementation Strategy 7.1.2: Pass City Resolution in support of these efforts.
TR Policy 7.2: The City will support efforts to provide more efficient delivery of dial-a-ride ser-
vices for Scandia residents, including but not limited to efforts to utilize the Village Center as a focus
of service.
TR Implementation Strategy 7.2.1: Develop a survey of dial-a-ride patrons in Scandia to
ascertain what the City can do, if anything, to improve or support this service.
TR Policy 7.3: Continue to maintain Scandia’s park and ride lot in the village center.
Transit Goals and Policies
Transportation
152 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Policies and Strategies
153Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix ANatural Resource Overlay
Natural resource protection is an important component of Scandia’s vision, goals, and poli-
cies. Protecting natural resources does not, however, preclude development or other land
activities. The presence of important natural features, resources, or systems will shape the
way that development occurs, but does not change the preferred type of development or ac-
tivity as shown the future land use map. The Natural Resource Priority Overlay shows areas
where important natural features are located so that Scandia can make appropriate decisions
on how to fulfill the vision shown on the future land use map while minimizing the risk to
priority natural resources.
As shown on the overlay map, natural features are present in most of the City. Some areas,
however, have multiple natural features or particularly high quality features and show a
higher priority level. The Overlay shows a gradient of priorities for natural features ranging
from a score of 4 to a score of 38. The method for computing the score is described below.
Step 1 The Comprehensive Plan Committee identified eight natural features that should
shape the way that land is used or developed:
How was the overlay created?
1. Rivers and streams
2. Lakes
3. Wetlands
4. Groundwater
5. Significant natural areas/habitat
6. Existing and potential corridors
7. Steep slopes
8. Soils
Step 2 Key measurable characteristics for each natural feature were identified based on
input from public meetings, focus groups, and Comprehensive Plan Committee
discussions. Example: Four characteristics of lakes were identified: water quality,
potential benefit of restoration, shoreland area, and slopes and bluffs near lakes.
Step 3 A point system was used to identify high priority areas using the matrix developed
in Step 1. Example: Lakes with higher water quality received more points than
those with average or low water quality.
Step 4 A map was created for each natural feature showing high priority areas (more
points) and lower priority areas (less points).
Step 5 All the maps were layered on top of one another. A composite point score was
calculated for each location by adding up the scores for each natural resource pres-
ent. In this way, the Comprehensive Plan Committee determined which places
have the highest priority for natural resource protection overall. Example: A loca-
tion that is near a high quality lake, in a wetland and that offers high quality wildlife
habitat combines all the points from each natural feature and is rated higher than
an area that is near a lake but is not a wetland or a habitat area.
The following pages include the detailed matrix for each natural feature and the individual
priority maps for each feature.
154 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix ANatural Resource Priority Areas Mapping
City of Scandia CPC May 31, 2008 Natural Resource Priority Matrix NaturalFeaturePriorityRanking Characteristics for Use in Priority Ranking1. Surface Water –Rivers and streams A.Type of streams B.Tributary streams to the St. Croix River C.Shoreland area adjacent to the St. Croix River D.Slopes and bluffs near rivers and streams MostImportant Land areas within 300’ of DNR designated trout streams Land areas within 100’ of tributary streams to St. Croix RiverLand areas within 100’ of St. Croix River Area with greater than 18% slope within 300’ of river or streamImportant Land areas within 300’ of perennial non-trout streams Land areas between 100’ and 200’ of tributary streams to St. Croix River Land areas between 100’ and 200’ of St. Croix River Area with 12% to less than 18% slope within 300’ of river or stream Of Concern Land areas within 300’ of intermittent non-trout streams Land areas between 200’ and 300’ of tributary streams to St. Croix River Land areas between 200’ and 300’ of St. Croix River Area with 10 % to less than 12% slope within 300’ of river or stream EcologicalRationale/Land uses near streams have an impact on stream water quality and in particular on the cool temperature required for trout habitat. Vegetation near trout streams should provide shade and runoff should infiltrate rather than runoff into the stream. The closer structures are to the water, the more impact runoff has on the water, the more distant structures are the more runoff will infiltrate before going into the water. The closer structures are to the water, the more impact runoff has on the water, the more distant structures are the more runoff will infiltrate before going into the water. Runoff carries pollutants, sediments, increased volume and heat into rivers and streams and decreases water quality. If not vegetated or if disturbed, sloped areas near water cause higher velocity and more polluted runoff. DataSourceDNR Trout Streams – From DNR Data Deli http://deli.dnr.state.mn.us/metadata.html?id=L260000240202TROUT_FLAG > 0 EOR Inc. shapefile spring_survey_streams.shp from field survey 2007 Spatial Analyst derived distance from St Croix River feature in DNR Lakes layer from Data Deli. http://deli.dnr.state.mn.us/metadata.html?id=L260000062101 Slope derived using Spatial Analyst from DNR 30m Digital Elevation Model from Data Deli http://deli.dnr.state.mn.us/metadata.html?id=L390005620606Page 1 of 8
155Scandia Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia CPC May 31, 2008 Natural Resource Priority Matrix NaturalFeaturePriorityRanking Characteristics for Use in Priority Ranking2. Surface Water –Lakes A.Lakes with existing high water quality B.Priority lakes to restore to high quality C.Shoreland area adjacent to lakes D.Slopes and bluffs near lakesMostImportant Lakes with a water quality rating of A or B Lakes classified as Recreational Development (RD) lakes with a water quality rating of B, C, or D Land areas within 300’ of ordinary high water level (OHWL)Area with greater than 18% slope within 1000’ of a lakeImportant Land areas between 300’ and 600’ of ordinary high water level (OHWL) Area with 12% to less than 18% slope within 1000’ of a lake Of Concern Land areas between 600’ and 1000’ of ordinary high water level (OHWL) Area with 10 % to less than 12% slope within 1000’ of a lake EcologicalRationaleMaintaining high water quality and preventing degradation is important ecologically and economically. Priority given to lakes with recreational use and value(2 RD lakes also rated C or D quality.) The closer structures are to the water, the more impact runoff has on the water, the more distant structures are the more runoff will infiltrate before going into the water. Runoff carries pollutants, sediments, increased volume and heat into rivers and streams and decreases water quality. If not vegetated or if disturbed, sloped areas near water cause higher velocity and more polluted runoff.DataSourceEOR, Inc. water quality assessment rating for lakes. DNR Public Waters Inventory basin delineations shapefile from Data Deli http://deli.dnr.state.mn.us/metadata.html?id=L390002020201Spatial Analyst derived distance from DNR 24k lake polygons from Data Deli http://deli.dnr.state.mn.us/metadata.html?id=L260000062101Slope derived using Spatial Analyst from DNR 30m Digital Elevation Model from Data Deli http://deli.dnr.state.mn.us/metadata.html?id=L390005620606 and within distance of 24k lake polygons http://deli.dnr.state.mn.us/metadata.html?id=L260000062101Page 2 of 8 Appendix ANatural Resource Priority Areas Mapping
156 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix ANatural Resource Priority Areas Mapping
City of Scandia CPC May 31, 2008 Natural Resource Priority Matrix NaturalFeaturePriorityRanking Characteristics for Use in Priority Ranking3. Wetlands A. Wetland quality B. Relationship to wetland complex C. Wetland buffer area MostImportant High quality, native vegetation; high wetland functionality (M_34X = AB or B) Part of an integrated wetland complex – one or more adjacent wetland areas Land within 200 feet of a high quality (AB or B rating) wetland Important Medium quality, native vegetation; some invasive species; medium wetland functionality (M_34X = BC or C) In near proximity to wetland complex – wetland areas within 500’ of another wetlandLand within 100 feet of a medium quality (BC or C rating) wetland Of Concern More invasive species; low wetland functionality (M_34X = CD or D) Isolated wetland – wetland area not within 500’ of another wetland Land within 50 feet of wetlands with CD or D rating EcologicalRationaleWetlands with high level of functionally and few invasive species are more valuable as green infrastructure for stormwater management, groundwater infiltration, and habitat protection. Wetlands that are part of a complex are generally more valuable as natural resource corridors and habitat than isolated wetlands. Land adjacent to a wetland provides buffering benefits from stormwater and to sustain plant and animal habitat. Recommended buffer widths for protecting wetland functions range from 50 to 200 feet depending on sensitivity and quality. DataSourceMLCCS data from MetroGIS http://www.datafinder.org/metadata/mndnr_lulc_mlccspy3.htmand CMSCWD wetland assessment shapefile cmwd_mnram_11oct06.shp 4.Groundwater A. Sensitivity to pollution B. Groundwater sensitive resources MostImportant Very high and high sensitivity Seepage swamps Important Of Concern EcologicalRationaleManaging groundwater quality requires attending to those areas where groundwater is sensitive to polluting land uses or activities. Seepage swamps demonstrate places where groundwater is close to ground level and is exposed to risk from land uses or land activities. DataSourceMGS sensitivity of the Prairie du Chien Aquifer to pollution, from MetroGIS http://www.datafinder.org/metadata/wash_pduchein_sens.htm MLCCS data from MetroGIS http://www.datafinder.org/metadata/mndnr_lulc_mlccspy3.htmQueried for seepage wetland types in field C_TEXT. Page 3 of 7
157Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix ANatural Resource Priority Areas Mapping
City of Scandia CPC May 31, 2008 Natural Resource Priority Matrix NaturalFeaturePriorityRanking Characteristics for Use in Priority Ranking5. Ecologically Significant Sites/ High QualityNatural Areas A. Sites of Biodiversity Significance from the County Biological Survey B. Regionally Significant Ecological Areas C. High quality natural areas MostImportant CBS sites classified as “outstanding” or “high” RSEA sites with an ecological score of “outstanding” MLCCS natural areas with a quality ranking of “high” Important CBS sites classified as “moderate” RSEA sites with an ecological score of “high”MLCCS natural areas with a quality ranking of “medium” Of Concern CBS sites classified as “below” (A classification of “below” still indicates meaningful significance)RSEA sites with an ecological score of “moderate”MLCCS natural areas with a quality ranking of “low” EcologicalRationaleThe CBS identifies high quality, unique plant communities and remnants. Regionally significant sites include habitat or plant communities that are unusual within the region, and important in order to maintain biological diversity. The MLCCS identifies the quality of every type of land cover. DataSourceDNR Sites of Biodiversity Significance from Data Deli http://deli.dnr.state.mn.us/metadata.html?id=L250000170201DNR Regionally Significant Ecological Areas from Data Deli http://deli.dnr.state.mn.us/metadata.html?id=L390002900201MLCCS data from MetroGIS http://www.datafinder.org/metadata/mndnr_lulc_mlccspy3.htmQueried quality in field M_34X.High quality are “AB” or “B”; Medium quality are “BC” or “C”; Low quality are “CD” or “D”. Page 4 of 7
158 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix ANatural Resource Priority Areas Mapping
City of Scandia CPC May 31, 2008 Natural Resource Priority Matrix Page 5 of 6 NaturalFeaturePriorityRanking Characteristics for Use in Priority Ranking6.Connections/Corridors A. Connections among natural resource complexes B. Parks, trails, and protected areas MostImportant High quality natural area, lake, river, stream, or wetland within 1/8 mile (660’) of another such feature Existing parks and protected trail corridors (Trail corridors outside road ROWs) Important High quality natural area, lake, river, stream, or wetland 1/8 to ¼ mile of another such feature Areas protected by a conservation easement, not a park or trail.Of Concern High quality natural area, lake, river, stream, or wetland ¼ to ½ mile of another such feature EcologicalRationaleNatural features that are close in proximity are more likely to serve as corridors for animal and plant habitat, and more likely to have core habitat features Parks, and trails provide opportunities for human connectivity. Conservation easements provide visual connectivity. DataSourceMLCCS data from MetroGIS http://www.datafinder.org/metadata/mndnr_lulc_mlccspy3.htm; CMSCWD wetland assessment shapefile cmwd_mnram_11oct06.shp, EOR, Inc. water quality assessment rating for lakes, Stream connections from MetroGIS Stream Network http://www.datafinder.org/metadata/stream_net_l.htmPark and trail information from 2006 Park, Trails, Recreation, and Open Space Plan. Conservation easements include a variety of easement programs including NPS, Mn Land Trust, Agricultural, RIM. 7. Slopes A. Steepness MostImportant Has 100 feet or more of contiguous slope greater than 18% Important Has 100 feet or more of contiguous slope greater than 12% Of Concern EcologicalRationaleThe steepness of slopes is a strong indicator of risk to waterbodies and adjacent natural areas if vegetation is disturbed, and is more likely to be visually prominent and contribute to rural character. DataSourceSlope derived using Spatial Analyst from DNR 30m Digital Elevation Model from Data Deli http://deli.dnr.state.mn.us/metadata.html?id=L390005620606
159Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix ANatural Resource Priority Areas Mapping
City of Scandia CPC May 31, 2008 Natural Resource Priority Matrix Page 6 of 6 NaturalFeaturePriorityRanking Characteristics for Use in Priority Ranking 8. Soils A. High-quality agricultural soils B. Erodible soils C. Soils with limitations for septic systems D. Shallow depth to bedrock MostImportant Prime Agricultural Soils Highly erosive soils Soil map units with “very limited” ratings in at least two of the three fields, with the third optionally being “moderately limited”Less than 100 feet to bedrock Important Other Farmland Soils Moderate to highly erosive soils Soil map units with “very limited” ratings in two of the three fields, with the third being “slightly limited” (in all cases Mounds)Of Concern Pasture Low to moderately erosive soils Soil map units with “moderately limited” ratings in at least two of the three fields, with the third optionally being “very limited”EcologicalRationaleCertain soils and ground cover serves as an asset to agricultural practices and rural character. Soil that is more prone to erosion is less suitable for development and poses a higher risk to water quality if vegetation is disturbed. Soils poorly suited for septic systems will limit development opportunities. Soils serve as a filter for groundwater recharge.DataSourceMetroGIS prime ag soils derived from NRCS SSURGO data http://www.datafinder.org/metadata/prime_ag_soil_a.htmNRCS – erodibility not identified in Washington County soils data, layer not created. NRCS Washington County soils survey. Three data fields were used – septic ratings for Trench (drainfields, pressure beds), At Grade, and Mounds. MGS data available from LMIC data clearinghousehttp://www.lmic.state.mn.us/chouse/metadata/dpthbdrk.html
160 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix ANatural Resource Priority Areas Mapping
Map 32 - Natural Resource Priorities : Composite
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205 th S t N
240th St N
Lofton Ave N185th St N
Mayberry Tr N Nolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N Oli
nda Tr
N177 th St N Pil
ar Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Manning Tr NMelanie Tr N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Ostrum Tr NKeystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NOlinda Tr NOakhill Rd N
Old Marine Tr NSai
nt Cr
oi
x
Tr
N1 7 7 t h S t NMayber
r
y Tr
NSaint Croix Tr NOlinda Tr N240th S t N
Manning Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Natural Resource Priorities:
Composite
Natural Resource Priorities:
Composite
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
City Boundary
Open Water
Streams
Data Sources:MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council,
EOR Inc, UMRBA, MGS
CMWD, CR Planning
June 21, 2008
Composite
Score
High : 41
Low : 0
Natural Features:
Rivers and Streams,
Lakes, Wetlands,
Groundwater,
High Quality Natural Areas,
Connections / Corridors,
Slopes, Soils
A high/dark composite score indicates the presence of multiple priority natural
resources. A low/light composite score indicates the presence of few priority
natural resources. See page 153 for an explanation of scoring methodology.
161Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix ANatural Resource Priority Areas Mapping
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Natural Resource Priorities:
Rivers and Streams
Natural Resource Priorities:
Rivers and Streams
City Boundary
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
Open Water
Streams
Composite Score
High : 38
Low : 0
Data Sources:MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council,
EOR Inc, UMRBA, MGS
CMWD, CR Planning
May 31, 2008
Rivers and
Streams Score
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Map 33 - Natural Resource Priorities : Rivers and Streams
A high/dark composite score indicates the presence of multiple priority natural resources. A low/light composite score indicates
the presence of few priority natural resources. See page 153 for an explanation of scoring methodology. The colored areas
indicate the presence of the natural resource featured on this map. A dark color/high number indicates that the featured natural
resource has multiple attributes that are considered important. A light color/low number indicates that the featured natural
resource has fewer attributes that are considered important. See pages 154-157 for attributes that were considered.
162 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix ANatural Resource Priority Areas Mapping
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Natural Resource Priorities:
Lakes
Natural Resource Priorities:
Lakes
City Boundary
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
Open Water
Streams
Composite Score
High : 38
Low : 0
Data Sources:MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council,
EOR Inc, UMRBA, MGS
CMWD, CR Planning
May 31, 2008
Lakes Score
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Map 34 - Natural Resource Priorities : Lakes
A high/dark composite score indicates the presence of multiple priority natural resources. A low/light composite score indicates
the presence of few priority natural resources. See page 153 for an explanation of scoring methodology. The colored areas
indicate the presence of the natural resource featured on this map. A dark color/high number indicates that the featured natural
resource has multiple attributes that are considered important. A light color/low number indicates that the featured natural
resource has fewer attributes that are considered important. See pages 154-157 for attributes that were considered.
163Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix ANatural Resource Priority Areas Mapping
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Natural Resource Priorities:
Wetlands
Natural Resource Priorities:
Wetlands
City Boundary
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
Open Water
Streams
Composite Score
High : 38
Low : 0
Data Sources:MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council,
EOR Inc, UMRBA, MGS
CMWD, CR Planning
May 31, 2008
Wetlands Score
1
2
3
4
5
6
Map 35 - Natural Resource Priorities : Wetlands
A high/dark composite score indicates the presence of multiple priority natural resources. A low/light composite score indicates
the presence of few priority natural resources. See page 153 for an explanation of scoring methodology. The colored areas
indicate the presence of the natural resource featured on this map. A dark color/high number indicates that the featured natural
resource has multiple attributes that are considered important. A light color/low number indicates that the featured natural
resource has fewer attributes that are considered important. See pages 154-157 for attributes that were considered.
164 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix ANatural Resource Priority Areas Mapping
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
a
ris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr
NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Natural Resource Priorities:
Groundwater
Natural Resource Priorities:
Groundwater
City Boundary
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
Open Water
Streams
Composite Score
High : 38
Low : 0
Data Sources:MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council,
EOR Inc, UMRBA, MGS
CMWD, CR Planning
May 31, 2008
Groundwater Score
1
2
3
4
5
6
Map 36 - Natural Resource Priorities : Groundwater
A high/dark composite score indicates the presence of multiple priority natural resources. A low/light composite score indicates
the presence of few priority natural resources. See page 153 for an explanation of scoring methodology. The colored areas
indicate the presence of the natural resource featured on this map. A dark color/high number indicates that the featured natural
resource has multiple attributes that are considered important. A light color/low number indicates that the featured natural
resource has fewer attributes that are considered important. See pages 154-157 for attributes that were considered.
165Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix ANatural Resource Priority Areas Mapping
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Natural Resource Priorities:
Ecology / High Quality Areas
Natural Resource Priorities:
Ecology / High Quality Areas
City Boundary
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
Open Water
Streams
Composite Score
High : 38
Low : 0
Data Sources:MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council,
EOR Inc, UMRBA, MGS
CMWD, CR Planning
May 31, 2008
Ecology Score
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Map 37 - Natural Resource Priorities : Ecology / High Quality Areas
A high/dark composite score indicates the presence of multiple priority natural resources. A low/light composite score indicates
the presence of few priority natural resources. See page 153 for an explanation of scoring methodology. The colored areas
indicate the presence of the natural resource featured on this map. A dark color/high number indicates that the featured natural
resource has multiple attributes that are considered important. A light color/low number indicates that the featured natural
resource has fewer attributes that are considered important. See pages 154-157 for attributes that were considered.
166 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix ANatural Resource Priority Areas Mapping
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Natural Resource Priorities:
Corridors and Connections
Natural Resource Priorities:
Corridors and Connections
City Boundary
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
Open Water
Streams
Composite Score
High : 38
Low : 0
Data Sources:MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council,
EOR Inc, UMRBA, MGS
CMWD, CR Planning
May 31, 2008
Corridors Score
1
2
3
4
5
6
Map 38 - Natural Resource Priorities : Corridors and Connections
A high/dark composite score indicates the presence of multiple priority natural resources. A low/light composite score indicates
the presence of few priority natural resources. See page 153 for an explanation of scoring methodology. The colored areas
indicate the presence of the natural resource featured on this map. A dark color/high number indicates that the featured natural
resource has multiple attributes that are considered important. A light color/low number indicates that the featured natural
resource has fewer attributes that are considered important. See pages 154-157 for attributes that were considered.
167Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix ANatural Resource Priority Areas Mapping
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Natural Resource Priorities:
Steep Slopes
Natural Resource Priorities:
Steep Slopes
City Boundary
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
Open Water
Streams
Composite Score
High : 38
Low : 0
Data Sources:MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council,
EOR Inc, UMRBA, MGS
CMWD, CR Planning
May 31, 2008
Slopes Score
2
3
Map 39 - Natural Resource Priorities : Steep Slopes
A high/dark composite score indicates the presence of multiple priority natural resources. A low/light composite score indicates
the presence of few priority natural resources. See page 153 for an explanation of scoring methodology. The colored areas
indicate the presence of the natural resource featured on this map. A dark color/high number indicates that the featured natural
resource has multiple attributes that are considered important. A light color/low number indicates that the featured natural
resource has fewer attributes that are considered important. See pages 154-157 for attributes that were considered.
168 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix ANatural Resource Priority Areas Mapping
Map 40 - Natural Resource Priorities : Soils
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Natural Resource Priorities:
Soils
Natural Resource Priorities:
Soils
City Boundary
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
Open Water
Streams
Composite Score
High : 40
Low : 0
Data Sources:MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council,
EOR Inc, UMRBA, MGS
CMWD, CR Planning
June 21, 2008
Soils Score
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
A high/dark composite score indicates the presence of multiple priority natural resources. A low/light composite score indicates
the presence of few priority natural resources. See page 153 for an explanation of scoring methodology. The colored areas
indicate the presence of the natural resource featured on this map. A dark color/high number indicates that the featured natural
resource has multiple attributes that are considered important. A light color/low number indicates that the featured natural
resource has fewer attributes that are considered important. See pages 154-157 for attributes that were considered.
169Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix BImplementation Schedule
The Implementation Matrix in this Appendix lists each implementation strategy discussed in
the Goals, Policies and Strategies section of the Comprehensive Plan and provides guidance
on how the strategy will be accomplished. For each implementation strategy, the matrix
lists: entities responsible for implementation; an approximate time by which the strategy will
be completed; and whether the strategy will involve a regulatory change, a new program, or
education for residents. The matrix will be revised and refined as the City of Scandia pro-
ceeds with the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan. Implementation Strategy Primary Responsible Parties Secondary Responsible Parties To be completed within __ years: Regulatory change Program Edu-cation 1510 NATURAL RESOURCES NR Implementation Strategy 1.2.1: The City will develop and adopt standards for the design, installation, and maintenance of alternative and experimental wastewater treatment systems. City of Scandia Watershed Districts (WDs), Washington Conservation District (WCD) a ISTS ordinance NR Implementation Strategy 2.1.1: The City will implement its Local Water Management Plan that conforms to the standards and rules of the watershed districts. Scandia, WDs WCD a a a NR Implementation Strategy 2.2.1: The City will participate in Total Maximum Daily Load studies and Implementation Plans to address impaired water bodies within the City. MPCA, WDs City of Scandia a a NR Implementation Strategy 2.2.2: The City will provide educational materials to residents and businesses regarding the relationship between stormwater runoff and impaired waters. (See NR Implementation Strategy 2.5.1 and 2.9.1) WDs, WCD City of Scandia a a NR Implementation Strategy 2.2.3: The City will develop and adopt an Operations and Maintenance Manual that outlines “good housekeeping” practices that can be used to reduce pollutants in stormwater runoff leaving City-owned sites. (See NR Implementation Strategy 2.8.1) Scandia WCD a a NR Implementation Strategy 2.2.4: The City will work with other units of government and other partners to identify waters in danger of becoming impaired and work to avoid these waters being listed as impaired in the future. Scandia, WDs a a a NR Implementation Strategy 2.3.1: The City will work with local watershed districts to develop a streamlined process for sharing and reviewing permits with potential impacts to surface waters. Scandia, WDs a SubdivisionISTS a NR Implementation Strategy 2.3.2: The City will work with local watershed districts to create and distribute an Information Packet with information on application requirements, deadlines, the review process, permitting requirements of the City and local watershed districts, etc., to developers at the beginning of the development process. Scandia, WDs ` a a
170 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix BImplementation Schedule Implementation Strategy Primary Responsible Parties Secondary Responsible Parties To be completed within __ years: Regulatory change Program Edu-cation 1510 NR Implementation Strategy 2.4.1: (This strategy is repeated as strategies 5.1.2 and 6.1.1) The City will develop and adopt an ordinance requiring all development to utilize low-impact techniques that: • Utilize the Natural Resource Protection Areas map to identify large, connected natural systems • Consider the impact of development on rare plant and animal species • Preserve the natural features of the site or utilize constructed systems that mimic the natural hydrologic system • Reduce storm water runoff to pre-development levels • Retain, infiltrate, and filter stormwater runoff before its release into the City’s water bodies • Eliminate or entrap pollutants before they enter surface waters • Restore or enhance the ability of soils to absorb, retain, and infiltrate water • Minimize impervious surfaces in new development (This strategy is repeated as strategies NR 4.2.2, NR 5.1.2, NR 5.2.1, NR 6.1.1, LU 4.2.2, LU 8.2.1, and LU 9.2.1, so they are not included in this chart) City of Scandia a Zoning Subdivision NR Implementation Strategy 2.5.2: The City may consider incentives such as tax breaks or cost-share programs for landowners who install practices that reduce or disconnect impervious surfaces or allow water to be slowed or detained in vegetated areas. Scandia, Washington County WCD, WDs a a NR Implementation Strategy 2.5.3: The City will help promote existing stormwater management related cost-share programs offered by local watershed districts and other partners. Scandia WCD, WDs a a NR Implementation Strategy 2.5.4: Create an inventory of stormwater facilities within the City, both public and private, and determine whether facilities are functioning as designed. Scandia WDs a a NR Implementation Strategy 2.6.1: The City will work to integrate enforcement of regulations designed to protect sensitive areas with the City’s other enforcement and inspection functions. Scandia a a NR Implementation Strategy 2.7.1: The City will cooperate with local watershed districts to complete a functions and values assessment and will use the results to preserve and protect wetlands within the City. WDs Scandia a a
171Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix BImplementation Schedule Implementation Strategy Primary Responsible Parties Secondary Responsible Parties To be completed within __ years: Regulatory change Program Edu-cation 1510 NR Implementation Strategy 2.7.2: The City may consider incentives like tax breaks or cost-share programs for land owners who restore wetland resources outside of the WCA mitigation process. Scandia, Washington County WCD, WDs a a NR Implementation Strategy 2.7.3: The City will create, protect, and enforce the creation and preservation of upland buffers adjacent to wetlands. Scandia WDs aaaSubdivisionShoreland NR Implementation Strategy 2.7.4: Through a change in the Subdivision Ordinance, the City will require development applicants to delineate wetlands and complete a wetland assessment using the MnRAM 3.0 process or higher. The subdivision review process will consider this information to determine if the development project has potential to negatively impact a protected wetland. If potential impact is identified, mitigation for the impact shall be required as part of development approval. Scandia WDs a Subdivision NR Implementation Strategy 2.8.1: The City will limit the use of pesticides and herbicides on City-owned property. Scandia a a NR Implementation Strategy 2.8.2: The City will implement innovative stormwater management practices to control runoff from City-owned property. Scandia a a NR Implementation Strategy 2.9.2: The City will support and promote the existing water-related education efforts of local watershed districts, Washington County, and other agencies. WDs, WCD Scandia a a NR Implementation Strategy 2.10.1: Consider lowering the allowed percentage of impervious surface per lot for new homes in lakeshore areas, particularly around those lakes where water quality is in decline. Scandia a Zoning Subdivision NR Implementation Strategy 2.10.2: Encourage the installation of pervious paving surfaces in the City’s development ordinances and develop or provide existing educational material about proper installation and maintenance. Scandia WDs, WCDa Subdivision a NR Implementation Strategy 2.11.1: Continue to enforce Scandia’s floodplain regulations. Scandia a Floodplain NR Implementation Strategy 2.11.2: Work with DNR and FEMA to update floodplain maps and zones in order to reflect changes in watershed development patterns and storm intensity. Scandia DNR, FEMA a Floodplain NR Implementation Strategy 3.2.1: Provide educational materials to residents about how to avoid damage to groundwater resources when using household chemicals in Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS). Scandia WDs, WCD a a
172 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix BImplementation Schedule Implementation Strategy Primary Responsible Parties Secondary Responsible Parties To be completed within __ years: Regulatory change Program Edu-cation 1510 NR Implementation Strategy 3.2.2: The City will develop and adopt performance standards for contaminant generating land use activities such as fuel storage and animal agriculture in areas with the potential to contaminate groundwater. Scandia a Zoning NR Implementation Strategy 3.3.1: The City will develop education programs that encourage water users to practice water conservation techniques. WDs, WCD Scandia a a NR Implementation Strategy 3.3.2: The City will implement water conservation practices in city-owned buildings. Scandia a a NR Implementation Strategy 3.4.1: The City will develop and adopt an ordinance that requires developers to restore soils compacted during site development through the use of practices such as compost amendments and soil ripping. Scandia a Subdivision Erosion & Sediment Control NR Implementation Strategy 3.4.2: The City will encourage local refuse haulers to develop curbside collection of materials that can be composted (both household and yard waste) to create a local supply of compost. Scandia Washington County a a NR Implementation Strategy 3.5.1: The City will provide educational materials to residents and businesses regarding stormwater management techniques that filter and infiltrate stormwater runoff to help recharge groundwater systems. Scandia WDs, WCD a a NR Implementation Strategy 3.5.2: The City will consider incentives such as tax breaks or cost-share programs for landowners who install stormwater management techniques that filter and infiltrate stormwater runoff to help recharge groundwater systems. Scandia, Washington County WCD, WDs a a NR Implementation Strategy 3.6.1: The City will provide educational materials to residents and businesses on utilizing native plants in their landscaping. Scandia WDs, WCD Landscape businesses a a NR Implementation Strategy 3.6.2: The City will demonstrate a commitment to the use of native plants by making use of them in landscaping on City-owned property. Scandia a a NR Implementation Strategy 3.6.3: The City will continue to require native plants in landscaping for new developments. Scandia a No change, enforcement NR Implementation Strategy 4.2.1: The City will use the natural resource priorities map and the 2006 Open Space Plan map to identify large, connected natural systems and will encourage and investigate various options for the protection of these areas. Scandia Washington County, WCD a Park dedicationa a NR Implementation Strategy 5.1.1: The City will work with Washington County and other partners to develop a land acquisition program for high quality areas identified on the natural resource priorities map. Scandia, Washington County WCD a a
173Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix BImplementation Schedule Implementation Strategy Primary Responsible Parties Secondary Responsible Parties To be completed within __ years: Regulatory change Program Edu-cation 1510 NR Implementation Strategy 5.1.3: The City will investigate the concept of Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) as a means of compensating landowners who give up development rights in order to meet community goals of agricultural preservation, natural resource protection, and life-cycle and affordable housing. The City will establish a study committee to evaluate the use of TDR and report conclusions to the City Council within one year after adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. (Same as LU 1.2.1 so it is not included in chart) Scandia a TDR program if recomm-ended NR Implementation Strategy 5.1.4: The City will investigate a Purchase of Development Rights (PDR) program to obtain conservation easements for lands with high preservation value. Scandia Washington County a a NR Implementation Strategy 5.3.1: The City may consider incentives like tax breaks, density bonuses, or cost-share programs for developers and land owners who restore indigenous plant communities and wildlife habitat. (Same as NR 7.1.1 so it is not included in chart) Scandia, Washington County WCD, WDs a Density bonuses a NR Implementation Strategy 6.1.2: The City will coordinate with the DNR on the review of developments with potential locations of rare plant and animal species. Scandia, DNR a Subdivision review NR Implementation Strategy 6.1.3: The City will use MLCCS criteria for requiring inventories as part of the development process. Scandia a Subdivision NR Implementation Strategy 6.2.1: The City will develop and adopt a corridor assessment that identifies key connections between existing high quality natural areas. Scandia WCD, WDs a a NR Implementation Strategy 6.2.2: The City will encourage developers to use the natural resource corridor assessment map to identify and protect key connections between natural systems. Scandia aaaZoning, Subdivision NR Implementation Strategy 7.1.2: The City will demonstrate a commitment to the use of native plants continuing to require native landscaping on City-owned property. Scandia aaa a NR Implementation Strategy 7.1.3: Encourage local nurseries to promote native species by clearly marking them or providing flyers to buyers. Work with local nurseries to provide educational programs on native landscaping that protects surface water and groundwater. (Same as LU 8.2.3 so it is not included in this chart) Scandia, local businesses WCD, WDs a a NR Implementation Strategy 7.2.1: The City will provide educational materials to residents on the environmental, economic, and social impacts of invasive species. Scandia, WCD, WDs a a a NR Implementation Strategy 7.2.2: The City will teach the public how to prevent the transportation of invasive species from one land and water habitat to another. Scandia, DNR WDs, WCD a a
174 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix BImplementation Schedule Implementation Strategy Primary Responsible Parties Secondary Responsible Parties To be completed within __ years: Regulatory change Program Edu-cation 1510 NR Implementation Strategy 7.2.3: The City will work with the Washington Conservation District, the DNR, and other agencies to promote existing invasive species education efforts (such as the DNR’s Invasive Species Program) within City boundaries. Scandia, DNR WCD, WDs a a NR Implementation Strategy 7.2.4: The City will encourage removal of invasive and exotic plants and animal species. Scandia, DNR WCD, WDs a a LAND USE LU Implementation Strategy 1.1.1: Modify existing zoning districts and create new zoning districts that are compatible with the preferred mix of land uses described in each Comprehensive Plan future land use areas. Scandia a Zoning LU Implementation Strategy 1.1.2: Explore the feasibility of initiating historic preservation efforts that would encourage the preservation of historic buildings, such as a revolving grant or loan program for façade improvements. Scandia Washington County a a LU Implementation Strategy 1.1.3: Work with Washington County Historical Society and Gammelgarden to provide educational materials to residents about the City’s historic buildings and sites, using techniques such as seasonal tours of buildings in the village center or awards for exemplary renovations. Scandia, Gammel- garden Washington County Historical Society a a LU Implementation Strategy 1.1.4: Encourage preserving historic landmark buildings - such as barns, village center structures, historic log homes - starting with an inventory and developing program criteria to identify structures. Scandia Washington County Historical Society a a LU Implementation Strategy 1.3.1: Continue developing the City’s inventory of scenic resources – scenic roads and viewsheds – using GIS methodology and the Visual Quality Analysis procedure. Use the scenic inventory for regulatory purposes, design review, and to provide educational materials to residents and landowners about the quality of these resources. Work with landowners prior to development to develop site-by-site strategies for protecting scenic resources. (Same as LU 10.3.1 and LU 14.2.1 so they are not included in this chart) Scandia National Park Service, Scenic St. Croix group a Subdivision review a a LU Implementation Strategy 2.1.1: Create a new Village Mixed Use (VMU) zoning district that emphasizes retail, commercial, and light industrial uses. Establish densities consistent with existing lot sizes. Lot sizes will also depend on the availability of community wastewater facilities. Scandia a Zoning
175Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix BImplementation Schedule Implementation Strategy Primary Responsible Parties Secondary Responsible Parties To be completed within __ years: Regulatory change Program Edu-cation 1510 LU Implementation Strategy 2.1.2: Establish design standards and guidelines to ensure that new commercial buildings reflect “downtown” character in their size, massing, setbacks, and other attributes. Promote the use of guidelines for new buildings to encourage architectural design that is compatible with its surroundings. Scandia a Design guidelines a LU Implementation Strategy 2.1.3: Establish design standards to improve the quality and appearance of light industrial development in the village center. Scandia a Zoning standards LU Implementation Strategy 2.1.4: Consider the VMU district as a receiving zone for a possible Transfer of Development Rights program. Scandia a TDR program LU Implementation Strategy 2.2.1: Plan for sidewalks or pedestrian pathways along all existing and new streets within the village center, and consider developing pedestrian connections where streets cannot connect neighborhoods with the village center. Scandia aaaSubdivisionCapital improvement program (CIP) LU Implementation Strategy 2.2.2: Plan for new street connections between the village center and nearby areas. Scandia aa CIP LU Implementation Strategy 2.3.1: Consider the feasibility of extending centralized wastewater treatment to serve the village area. Scandia MPCA a CIP LU Implementation Strategy 2.3.2: Provide for new commercial development adjacent to existing commercial areas in land use regulation. Scandia a Zoning map LU Implementation Strategy 2.3.3: Consider regulatory and financial incentives for programs to encourage existing building owners to make changes to meet design standards for the preservation, adaptive reuse, and design improvement of existing traditional structures. Scandia a aDesign standards a LU Implementation Strategy 2.3.4: Continue to focus public and civic facilities and activities within the village center (with the exception of parks and trails which may occur in any area). Scandia aaa a LU Implementation Strategy 2.4.1: Bring the Gateway Trail extension to the village area.DNR Scandia a a LU Implementation Strategy 2.4.2: Create pedestrian and bicycle connections through the village area, centering on the village core area. Scandia MnDOT a CIP LU Implementation Strategy 2.4.3: Consider lodging land uses that fit the character of the village and can be developed consistent with planned infrastructure capacity. Scandia a Zoning
176 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix BImplementation Schedule Implementation Strategy Primary Responsible Parties Secondary Responsible Parties To be completed within __ years: Regulatory change Program Edu-cation 1510 LU Implementation Strategy 3.1.1: Create a new Village Neighborhood zoning district that emphasizes residential lands uses on small lots. The density and minimum lot size of the Village Neighborhood areas will be 1 dwelling unit per 2.5 acres. Bonus densities up to 1 dwelling unit per acre may be earned as an incentive for providing multi-family or life-cycle housing or use of Transfer of Development Rights. (Same at H 1.1.1, so it is not included in this chart) Scandia a Zoning LU Implementation Strategy 3.1.2: Establish design standards and guidelines to ensure that new residential buildings are compatible with existing historic buildings in terms of building height and massing, placement on the lot, and garage and driveway placement. Scandia a Design standards LU Implementation Strategy 3.1.3: Consider the Village Neighborhood district as a receiving area for a possible Transfer of Development Rights program. (See NR 5.1.3) Scandia a TDR program LU Implementation Strategy 3.2.1: Develop street and pedestrian path standards for new development that avoids cul-de-sac development and provides for pedestrian connections to the village center. Scandia aaaSubdivision CIP LU Implementation Strategy 3.3.1: Provide pedestrian access to parks and trails and community destinations. Scandia aaSubdivision CIP LU Implementation Strategy 3.3.2: Consider conservation performance standards to protect natural features in and near the village center. Scandia a Perform-ance stds. a a LU Implementation Strategy 3.3.3: Consider landscaping standards for new development along the public right-of-way. Scandia a Subdivision LU Implementation Strategy 4.1.1: Create performance standards for priority natural features identified in Scandia’s Natural Resource priorities maps and component maps. Scandia a Perform-ance stds. LU Implementation Strategy 4.2.1: Establish a study committee to evaluate the use of TDR for achieving agricultural preservation, natural resource protection, and life-cycle and affordable housing goals. Report back to City Council with recommendations within one year after the adoption of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. (See NR 5.1.3; same as LU 5.2.1 so it is not included in this chart) Scandia a TDR program
177Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix BImplementation Schedule Implementation Strategy Primary Responsible Parties Secondary Responsible Parties To be completed within __ years: Regulatory change Program Edu-cation 1510 LU Implementation Strategy 5.1.1: Create a new Agricultural Core zoning district where agriculture is the predominant use, but allowing for secondary use when compatible with agriculture, including low density residential, commercial recreation, and agricultural-related commercial. Establish densities of 4 units per 40 acres. Within the 4 per 40 density limit, a variety of lot sizes will be encouraged in the manner of the current lot averaging zoning: lots of 2 to 5 acres in size or 20 acres or greater would be allowed. Bonus densities of up to 75% of the base density may be earned only if developers use the Open Space Conservation Subdivision process and undertake actions such as permanent protection of agricultural land or open space, or protection or enhancement of natural resources. (Same as ED 4.3.1 so it is not included in this chart) Scandia a Zoning LU Implementation Strategy 5.1.2: Provide educational materials to current and prospective residents about quality-of-life issues such as noise and odors that can be expected in proximity to agricultural operations. (Same as LU 5.5.1 so it is not included in this chart) Scandia aaa a LU Implementation Strategy 5.1.3: Investigate the feasibility of small-scale programs to assist agricultural producers and promote Scandia as an agricultural-friendly community. For example, programs matching farmers wishing to rent land for cultivation with landowners or homeowners associations with available land, or programs offering seasonal tours of farms and farm-related enterprises. Scandia Washington County, MN Dept. of Agriculture a a LU Implementation Strategy 5.3.1: Develop standards for Open Space Conservation Subdivisions that are specific to agricultural protection. Scandia a Subdivision LU Implementation Strategy 5.4.1: Create an agricultural preserves overlay district to encourage continued or expanded agricultural land uses in the agricultural core future land use area and the general rural future land use area. Scandia a Zoning LU Implementation Strategy 5.4.2: Promote the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves Program as a voluntary means for land owners in the agricultural core and general rural areas to meet community character and stewardship goals. (Same as ED 4.3.2, not incld.)Scandia MN Dept. of Agricultureaaa a LU Implementation Strategy 6.1.1: Create a new general rural zoning district that combines both agricultural production and single-family residential uses, along with parks, commercial recreation, and similar rural uses. Allow a density of 4 dwelling units per 40 acres with a minimum allowed lot size of 2 acres (lot averaging is not required). Scandia a Zoning LU Implementation Strategy 6.1.2: Limit use of smaller lots for inappropriate activities that have noise and other nuisance impacts on surrounding areas. Scandia a Zoning
178 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix BImplementation Schedule Implementation Strategy Primary Responsible Parties Secondary Responsible Parties To be completed within __ years: Regulatory change Program Edu-cation 1510 LU Implementation Strategy 6.2.1: Develop standards for Open Space Conservation Subdivisions that protect priority natural features in General Rural areas as identified within Scandia’s Natural Resource Protection Areas overlay. Bonus densities of up to 75% of the base density may be earned only if developers use the Open Space Conservation Subdivision process and undertake actions such as protection or enhancement of natural resources, or permanent protection of agricultural land or open space. Scandia a Subdivision LU Implementation Strategy 6.2.2: When siting new buildings or drives, encourage and incorporate protection or screening of scenic views from roads into design standards. Use the City’s inventory of scenic resources for regulatory purposes, design review, and to educate residents and landowners about the quality of these resources. Work with landowners prior to development to develop site-by-site strategies for protecting scenic resources. Require landscaping or screening requirements along major roadways encouraging the use of native vegetation. Scandia aa Subdivision a LU Implementation Strategy 7.1.1: Consider the General Rural land use area as a receiving area for a Transfer of Development Rights program. (See NR 5.1.3) Scandia a TDR Program LU Implementation Strategy 7.2.1: Require non-motorized travel connections in new development to other neighborhoods, parks, or schools. Scandia a Subdivision LU Implementation Strategy 8.1.1: Create a new zoning overlay or district allowing traditional density and form of lakeshore development. Scandia a Zoning LU Implementation Strategy 8.2.2: Create incentives for owners of existing developed shoreland to create buffers and rain gardens. Scandia a a LU Implementation Strategy 8.3.1: Consider pro-active means of protecting sensitive areas, including Purchase of Development Rights programs and participation in DNR and watershed district shoreline restoration programs. Scandia, DNR Washington County a a LU Implementation Strategy 8.3.2: Initiate programs to improve stormwater management in shoreland areas. Scandia WCD, WDs a a LU Implementation Strategy 9.1.1: Create a new zoning district or overlay to restrict density and set design standards that protect natural resources and systems. Scandia a Zoning LU Implementation Strategy 9.1.2: Encourage Open Space Conservation Subdivisions that use low-impact development techniques to protect and enhance high quality natural areas identified on Scandia’s Natural Resource Protection Areas overlay. Scandia a Zoning, Subdivision
179Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix BImplementation Schedule Implementation Strategy Primary Responsible Parties Secondary Responsible Parties To be completed within __ years: Regulatory change Program Edu-cation 1510 LU Implementation Strategy 9.2.1: Consider creating or participating in an existing Purchase of Development Rights program to permanently protect undeveloped sensitive natural areas in shoreland areas. Scandia Washington County a a LU Implementation Strategy 9.2.2: Consider restoration requirements for degraded natural areas in the zoning district or overlay development standards. Scandia a Zoning, Subdivision LU Implementation Strategy 10.1.1: Revise the St. Croix River ordinance to be specific to the City’s needs and interests, including protection of scenic views of the river and encouragement of visual or physical access in appropriate locations. Scandia a Zoning LU Implementation Strategy 10.2.1: Follow the recommendations of the Parks, Trails, Recreation and Open Space Plan to improve access, increase visibility, and improve stewardship. Scandia aa a a LU Implementation Strategy 11.1.1: Create a new zoning district for the Rural Commercial Nodes shown on the Future Land Use Map that would encourage businesses that serve visitors and users of the City’s recreational assets. Establish a 2-acre minimum lot size for commercial development and residential densities consistent with on-site septic systems. Scandia a Zoning LU Implementation Strategy 11.2.1: Establish design standards to ensure that new commercial buildings reflect the historic character of their surroundings in their size, massing, setbacks and other attributes. Scandia a Zoning LU Implementation Strategy 11.3.1: Improve pedestrian crossings, consider installation of sidewalks and walkways in defined areas, and work with businesses to improve signage for parking areas, paths and trails. Scandia a Subdivision, Design standards a a LU Implementation Strategy 12.1.1: Consider participating in an existing Purchase of Development Rights program or creating a new program to permanently protect high priority sites on the Natural Resources Overlay or those identified as park search areas. Scandia Washington County a a LU Implementation Strategy 12.1.2: Use Park Dedication requirements to protect scenic or natural resources. Scandia a Park dedication LU Implementation Strategy 12.1.3: Establish partnerships with county, state, and federal agencies and private land protection organizations for the management, protection and enhancement of protected recreation areas. Scandia aa a
180 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix BImplementation Schedule Implementation Strategy Primary Responsible Parties Secondary Responsible Parties To be completed within __ years: Regulatory change Program Edu-cation 1510 LU Implementation Strategy 12.2.1: Consider purchasing conservation easements from willing landowners to meet management goals. Scandia Washington County a a LU Implementation Strategy 12.2.2: Create development standards that require a buffer for new development that is adjacent to recreation areas. Scandia a Subdivision LU Implementation Strategy 13.1.1: The City will continue to implement its Aggregate Resource Ordinance, which governs the relationship between mining operations and existing and proposed developments. Scandia aaaAggregate Ordinance enforcement LU Implementation Strategy 13.2.1: The City will continue to implement ordinance provisions requiring extraction sites to have a reclamation plan indicating how mined lands will be restored to a safe, attractive, and usable condition with native vegetation after the extractive use has ended. Scandia aaaAggregate Ordinance enforcement LU Implementation Strategy 13.3.1: The City will continue to use its Aggregate Resource Ordinance to govern the relationship between mining operations and existing and proposed developments. Scandia aaaAggregate Ordinance enforcement LU Implementation Strategy 14.1.1: Modify street standards to maintain the visual qualities of identified scenic roads, including allowing a narrower right-of-way and protection of vegetation within that right-of-way. Scandia a Subdivision LU Implementation Strategy 14.3.1: Consider creating a scenic overlay district that modifies setback, screening and landscaping, and building placement for new development to ensure that community character is maintained. Scandia a Zoning HOUSING H Implementation Strategy 1.1.2: Investigate opportunities and costs for expanding existing community wastewater or creating new community systems. Scandia a CIP program H Implementation Strategy 1.2.1: Work with the County HRA to identify market absorption rates for senior housing, amenities that will sustain senior housing, and financing opportunities for new senior housing development. Scandia Washington County HRA a a H Implementation Strategy 1.2.2: Identify village areas suitable for higher density affordable senior housing within zoning regulations. Scandia a Zoning H Implementation Strategy 1.3.1: Create indicators for tracking housing conditions, turnover rates, and owner/rental characteristics. Scandia a a
181Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix BImplementation Schedule Implementation Strategy Primary Responsible Parties Secondary Responsible Parties To be completed within __ years: Regulatory change Program Edu-cation 1510 ENERGY USE AND SYSTEMS ES Implementation Strategy 1.1.1: Require subdivisions to identify lots with good solar access and encourage passive solar design. Scandia a Subdivision ES Implementation Strategy 1.1.2: Consider tools such as solar easements to ensure long-term solar access. Scandia a Subdivision ES Implementation Strategy 1.2.1: Identify areas and the performance criteria under which wind and solar energy systems can be installed with minimal impact on Scandia’s landscape, natural viewshed corridors, and neighborhoods and prohibit more restrictive covenants. Scandia a Subdivision ES Implementation Strategy 1.2.2: Permit small wind energy systems, designed to serve primarily on-site needs, in Agricultural Core and General Rural future land use areas so the system does not detract from designated protected viewsheds. Restrict wind energy installations in the St. Croix River corridor. Scandia a Zoning ES Implementation Strategy 1.2.3: Designate districts where wind energy systems are permitted or conditional. Scandia a Zoning ES Implementation Strategy 1.3.1: Consider working with utility, state agency, and other entities on their efforts to educate about and provide incentive for energy efficiency. Scandia a a ES Implementation Strategy 1.4.1: Consider performance requirements for combustion efficiency and air emission controls to limit smoke and particulates in the village area. Scandia a Perform-ance stds. ES Implementation Strategy 1.4.2: Create standards for fuel storage that limits nuisances. Scandia a Perform-ance stds. ES Implementation Strategy 2.1.1: Work with Washington County and the Metropolitan Council to improve transit access in the village areas. Met Council Scandia, Wash. Cnty. a a ES Implementation Strategy 2.1.2: Work with developers, existing land owners, Washington County, and MnDOT to connect Scandia to regional trail systems and create bicycle trail connections that can connect people to jobs, goods, and services. Scandia MnDOT, County, DNR a a ES Implementation Strategy 2.3.1: Protect diversified agricultural operations from conflicting land uses. Scandia a Zoning ES Implementation Strategy 2.3.2: Encourage agricultural development that diversifies the type of products grown in Scandia. Scandia Dept. of Ag. a a ES Implementation Strategy 2.3.3: Consider applying eco-industrial park concepts to diversified local agricultural operations. Scandia a a
182 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix BImplementation Schedule Implementation Strategy Primary Responsible Parties Secondary Responsible Parties To be completed within __ years: Regulatory change Program Edu-cation 1510 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ED Implementation Strategy 1.1.1: Create architectural design guidelines with examples to guide facade improvements. Scandia a Design guidelines ED Implementation Strategy 1.1.2: Investigate incentive programs such as small grants or free design assistance to encourage building and property improvement. Scandia Washington County a a ED Implementation Strategy 1.2.1: Work with local banks and economic development entities to create opportunities for entrepreneurs to use empty or underused commercial buildings in the village. Scandia Local banks, Washington County a a ED Implementation Strategy 1.2.2: Consider redevelopment strategies in the village core to reassemble land and develop buildings that both meet desired design standards and are attractive to businesses starting, expanding, or relocating to Scandia. Scandia a a ED Implementation Strategy 1.3.1: Make investments in new public facilities adjacent to or connected with the village core area. Scandia a CIP ED Implementation Strategy 1.4.1: Restrict new non-agricultural commercial development to the village or other designated commercial nodes. Scandia a Zoning ED Implementation Strategy 1.4.2: Restrict creation or extension of community water or wastewater infrastructure outside designated commercial areas in the village. Scandia a CIP ED Implementation Strategy 1.5.1: Create design standards including architectural and landscaping standards consistent with a historic design pattern that provides continuity without restricting individuality. Scandia a Design standards a ED Implementation Strategy 1.5.2: Consider forming a design standard advisory committee to review proposals and make recommendations on design to the Planning Commission. Scandia a Zoning, Subdivision ED Implementation Strategy 2.1.1: Set maximum size limitations for commercial building footprints. Scandia a Zoning ED Implementation Strategy 2.1.2: Investigate standards that discourage formula food establishments. Scandia a Zoning ED Implementation Strategy 2.1.3: Prohibit franchise architecture or signage. Scandia a Zoning
183Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix BImplementation Schedule Implementation Strategy Primary Responsible Parties Secondary Responsible Parties To be completed within __ years: Regulatory change Program Edu-cation 1510 ED Implementation Strategy 2.2.1: Identify financial and technical barriers to entrepreneurship, coordinate efforts to remove those barriers, and promote Scandia as a place for entrepreneurs. Scandia Washington County a Economic Develop-ment (ED) program a ED Implementation Strategy 2.3.1: Identify existing niche businesses and create a promotional strategy to expand the visibility (within the larger region) of Scandia Village as a unique retail or service center. Scandia a ED programa ED Implementation Strategy 2.3.2: Explore the opportunities to link Scandia and it’s surrounding communities and small direct market agricultural producers to retail and services in the village center. Scandia a ED programa ED Implementation Strategy 2.3.3: Strengthen artist communities, arts incubators and arts as economic development. Scandia a ED programa ED Implementation Strategy 3.1.1: Identify specific types of home-based businesses that generate few nuisances and identify these in the zoning district land use tables. Scandia a Zoning ED Implementation Strategy 3.1.2: Set performance standards such as the number of customers per day to encourage home-based businesses to transition to a storefront when its market is adequately developed. Scandia a Perform-ance standards ED Implementation Strategy 4.1.1: Define agricultural uses in zoning regulation to include the unique mix of agriculture found in Scandia. Scandia a Zoning ED Implementation Strategy 4.1.2: Create incentives to attract new agricultural producers that fit a description of being oriented to local markets. Scandia a ED programa ED Implementation Strategy 4.1.3: Consider agricultural development incentives in tax structure, development regulations, and economic development programs. Scandia a ED program ED Implementation Strategy 4.2.1: Identify types of businesses (specifically businesses accessory to the primary agricultural activity on a parcel) that support the kind of agriculture encouraged in Scandia and make them conditional uses. Scandia a Zoning ED Implementation Strategy 4.3.3: Consider Purchase of Development Rights program options for proactively protecting key agricultural lands. Scandia a PDR program ED Implementation Strategy 4.3.4: Evaluate the potential market size for Transfer Development Rights (TDR) within Scandia. Scandia a TDR program
184 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix BImplementation Schedule Implementation Strategy Primary Responsible Parties Secondary Responsible Parties To be completed within __ years: Regulatory change Program Edu-cation 1510 ED Implementation Strategy 4.3.5: Consider options for multi-jurisdictional TDR programs. Scandia a TDR program ED Implementation Strategy 4.3.6: Consider incentive-based TDR programs, for instance, where subdivisions are given expedited regulatory review or more flexibility for rezonings or conditional use permits with participation in the TDR program. Scandia a TDR program ED Implementation Strategy 4.3.7: Consider a “bank” for development rights as part of a Purchase of Development Rights program. Scandia a TDR program ED Implementation Strategy 4.3.8: Explore the interest of local agricultural land owners in participating in the agricultural land trust/cooperative concept now being developed in the metropolitan area. Scandia a a PARKS AND TRAILS Implement recommendations in the Parks, Trails, Recreation, and Open Space Plan that was adopted in 2006. Scandia aaaSubdivisiona a TRANSPORTATION TR Implementation Strategy 1.1.1: Participate in long-range Washington County Transportation Plan updates; and modify street functional classification map as conditions warrant. Scandia Washington County aa a TR Implementation Strategy 1.1.2: Identify areas where there is potential for new driveway access points to interfere with the flow and safe operation of arterial traffic; and work with property owners to develop alternative access solutions. Scandia a a TR Implementation Strategy 1.2.1: Provide Washington County and MnDOT with timely opportunity to review and comment on potential subdivisions. Scandia Washington County aaaSubdivision TR Implementation Strategy 1.3.1: Require development and subdivision applications to demonstrate that alternatives to direct access (presently or in the future) have been explored. Scandia a Subdivision TR Implementation Strategy 1.4.1: Maintain up-to-date subdivision regulations. Scandia a Subdivision TR Implementation Strategy 1.4.2: Identify potential local street alignments in areas that are likely to experience subdivision in the near future. Scandia a CIP TR Implementation Strategy 1.4.3: Maintain up-to-date future local street map. Scandia a CIP
185Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix BImplementation Schedule Implementation Strategy Primary Responsible Parties Secondary Responsible Parties To be completed within __ years: Regulatory change Program Edu-cation 1510 TR Implementation Strategy 2.1.1: Require that development applications include information on development conditions in adjoining areas; and include Right Of Way and/or street stubs that support connection to orderly development of adjacent property. Scandia a Subdivision TR Implementation Strategy 2.1.2: Change subdivision regulations to require developers to construct and pave streets to the border of the development. Scandia a Subdivision TR Implementation Strategy 2.2.1: Incorporate/maintain subdivision performance standards rather than length limits. Scandia a Subdivision TR Implementation Strategy 2.3.1: Incorporate/maintain subdivision performance standards that preserve views and scenic qualities. Scandia a Subdivision TR Implementation Strategy 2.4.1: Use consultants, staff resources, and/or develop working committees to prioritize problem and opportunity areas for developing future alignments to connect existing discontinuous streets. Scandia a CIP TR Implementation Strategy 3.1.1: Develop a capital improvement plan based on the Pavement Management Study and other City priorities and financial constraints. Scandia a CIP TR Implementation Strategy 3.1.2: Update the Pavement Management Study periodically to keep the capital improvement plan consistent with needs. Scandia a a TR Implementation Strategy 4.1.1: Maintain zoning map consistency with comprehensive plan policies. Scandia a Zoning map TR Implementation Strategy 4.1.2: Require that development plans/subdivision plans accompany requests for rezoning. Scandia a Zoning, Subdivision TR Implementation Strategy 4.2.2: Continue to require that land subdivision, rezoning, and site plans be consistent with the comprehensive plan. Scandia a Zoning, Subdivision TR Implementation Strategy 4.3.1: Communicate with property owners about the goals and objectives for new street connections. Scandia a a TR Implementation Strategy 4.3.2: Develop an understanding of shared responsibility for costs of new roadway connections (e.g., developer vis-à-vis existing property owner vis-à-vis the City of Scandia). Scandia a a TR Implementation Strategy 5.1.1: Ensure the safety and comfort of the bicyclist in the design and maintenance of shoulders on collector streets. Scandia a CIP TR Implementation Strategy 5.2.1: Maintain subdivision regulations that support this policy. Scandia a Subdivision
186 Scandia Comprehensive Plan Implementation Strategy Primary Responsible Parties Secondary Responsible Parties To be completed within __ years: Regulatory change Program Edu-cation 1510 TR Implementation Strategy 6.1.1: Develop administrative procedures to ensure this policy is implemented. Scandia a Zoning, Airport Ord TR Implementation Strategy 7.1.1: Promote transit and other ridesharing options in City publications and at City Hall. Scandia a a TR Implementation Strategy 7.1.2: Pass City Resolution in support of these efforts. Scandia a TR Implementation Strategy 7.2.1: Develop a survey of dial-a-ride patrons in Scandia to ascertain what the City can do, if anything, to improve or support this service. Scandia Washington County a a Appendix BImplementation Schedule
187Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix CGlossary of Terms and List of Acronyms
The Glossary below provides definitions of words and phrases used in the Comprehensive
Plan that are not common or that have meanings specific to land use planning.
1. Affordable Housing – Housing for sale or rent, often created by a non-profit develop-
ment corporation, housing association, a community land trust, or public redevelopment
authority, to meet the needs of persons and households who cannot afford accommoda-
tion through the open market.
2. Arts Incubator – Buildings and programs that encourage arts businesses through prac-
tices such as reduced rents, share space and services, and networking among artists.
3. Attached Housing – A building containing dwelling units, each of which has primary
ground floor access to the outside and which are attached to each other by party walls
without openings. The term is intended primarily for such dwelling types as townhouses
and duplexes.
4. Comprehensive Plan – The official public document adopted by a community as the
policy guide for decisions about its future development and redevelopment. It consists
of a vision for the community, background data, goals, policy statements, standards and
programs for guiding the physical, social and economic development of a community.
5. Conservation Easement – A conservation easement is a voluntary, negotiated agree-
ment between a landowner and a non-profit or agency to limit the use of land in perpe-
tuity because of its resource value. A landowner may donate a conservation easement
or, in some cases, may be compensated for its value.
6. Conventional Subdivision – A subdivision in which property is divided into lots ac-
cording to the minimum lot size and width requirements for the zoning district.
7. Density – The number of housing units per acre, determined using the total acreage of
a project area.
8. Density Bonus – Granting additional square footage or additional housing units be-
yond that authorized in the zoning ordinance in exchange for the provision or preserva-
tion of an amenity at the same site or at another location.
9. Design Standards – A set of guidelines on the appearance and aesthetics of buildings
or improvements that governs construction, alteration, demolition or relocation of a
building or improvement, including land improvements.
10. Detached Housing – A residential dwelling unit containing not more than one dwell-
ing unit entirely surrounded by open space on the same lot.
11. Development – Any manmade change to improved or unimproved property, including
but not limited to buildings or other structures, altering the landscape by mining, dredg-
ing, filling, grading, paving, excavation, or drilling operations.
Glossary of Terms
188 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
12. Eco-Industrial Park – An industrial park designed around the principles of indus-
trial ecology, where waste products from one industry become feedstocks for other
industries.
13. Ecosystem – An interacting system formed by a biotic community and its physical
environment.
14. Functional Class – Identifies a public roadway according to its purpose and hierarchy
in the local or statewide highway system.
15. Goal – A statement that describes, usually in general terms, a desired future condition.
Goals are often about long-term expectations rather than short-term concerns.
16. Green Building – Green or sustainable building is the practice of creating healthier and
more resource-efficient models of construction, renovation, operation, maintenance,
and demolition.
17. Greenway – A linear open space established along either a natural corridor, such as a
stream, or overland along a road. It can be any natural or landscaped course for pedes-
trian and/or bicycle passage.
18. Historic Preservation – The act or process of applying measures to sustain the existing
form, structure, integrity, and material of a heritage resource.
19. Infill – The development of new housing, commercial, or other uses and buildings on
scattered vacant or underutilized sites within existing substantially built-up areas. Infill
could also refer to the development of housing or other buildings on a site already con-
taining existing buildings, some or all of which are retained.
20. Infrastructure – Permanent resources serving a community’s needs, commonly includ-
ing roads, sewers and other water resource management facilities, railways, and commu-
nications networks.
21. Land Use, Primary – The use of land in a future land use area that is intended to be
the predominant type of use.
22. Land Use, Secondary – The use of land in a future land use area that is intended to be
lesser than or subordinate to the primary land use.
23. Lifecycle Housing – According to the Met Council, lifecycle housing entails a range of
housing options that meet people’s preferences and circumstances at all of life’s stages.
It ranges from housing for young adults establishing new households to home for grow-
ing families with children, and housing for seniors in their retirement years. In particu-
lar, the Livable Communities Act expects options beyond the predominant larger-lot,
detached, single-family home.
24. Lot Averaging – A subdivision technique that allows the property owner to create par-
cels smaller than those of a conventional subdivision plan provided that the density of
Appendix CGlossary of Terms and List of Acronyms
189Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix C
the development does not exceed the maximum density permitted for the zoning district
and the density that can be achieved with a yield plan.
25. Metropolitan-Oriented Agriculture – Agricultural production whose market is local
(metropolitan area), rather than national or international commodity markets.
26. Mixed-Use Development – Projects that integrate different land uses such as retail
stores, restaurants, residences, civic buildings, offices and parks within a defined area.
27. Multi-Family Dwelling – A building or portion thereof which contains three or more
dwelling units for permanent occupancy, regardless of the method of ownership or type
of tenure. Included in the use type would be garden apartments, low and high rise apart-
ments, apartments for elderly housing and condominiums.
28. Non-Motorized Transportation – Infrastructure that provides facilities for walking
and biking, such as sidewalks, bicycle lanes, pedestrian and bike trails, and paths.
29. Nonpoint Source Pollution – Pollution that arises from diffuse sources such as agri-
cultural runoff, urban area impervious surface runoff and vehicle emissions.
30. Open Space – Lands containing creeks, greenways, forest, habitat areas, sensitive natu-
ral areas, and areas with unique characteristics that make them unsuitable for develop-
ment. Public Open Space usually refers to a parcel of land or water essentially unim-
proved and set aside, dedicated, designated, or reserved for public use or enjoyment.
Common Open Space usually refers to land within or related to a private development,
not individually owned or dedicated for public use, which is intended for the common
use or enjoyment of the residents or commercial tenants of the development, and may
include complementary structures such as swimming pools, tennis and basketball courts,
and similar facilities.
31. Open Space Conservation Subdivision – A subdivision technique which permits the
property owner to subdivide parcels into lots smaller than conventional subdivisions;
however, the development must to comply with certain design standards and a portion
of the property must remain as common open space.
32. Overlay Area or District – A future land use area or zoning district that specifies re-
quirements that apply to an area in addition to the basic or “underlying” set of require-
ments in the base area or district. For example, a Natural Resource Overlay Area or
District could establish additional or stricter development standards to protect particular
features within the zone, such as landscape features, scenic views, agricultural areas, or
watersheds. Natural Resource Overlay Areas or Districts can also be applied to residen-
tial areas to place additional design requirements and restrictions on property owners to
achieve certain specified preservation goals.
33. Park, Public – Publicly owned and operated parks, picnic areas, playgrounds, indoor/
outdoor athletic or recreation facilities, indoor/outdoor shelters, amphitheater, open
spaces, and other similar uses.
Glossary of Terms and List of Acronyms
190 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
34. Policies – These are similar to goals but much more specific. They are attainable, mea-
surable and are to be achieved within a stated period of time.
35. Purchase of Development Rights – The acquisition by government or a nonprofit en-
tity of the rights to develop a parcel of land. Development rights are held in the public
interest. The landowner receives the difference in price between the fair market value
and the protected, lesser use and retains all the rights of this lesser use. This is useful in
protecting agricultural land, historic sites and sensitive environmental areas.
36. Standards – Generally considered mandatory, while “guidelines” are advisory, although
both elements can be combined in a single document. Standards can be incorporated
in zoning regulations or used as free-standing documents that are referred to in City
ordinances.
37. Subdivision – The division of a tract or parcel of land into two or more lots, either by
platting or meets and bounds description for sale or development.
38. Sustainable Development – Development that maintains or enhances economic op-
portunity and community well-being while protecting and restoring the natural environ-
ment upon which people and economies depend. It is development that meets the needs
of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own
needs (Minnesota Statutes, Section 4A.07).
39. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) – A process by which the landowner re-
ceives compensation from a developer for the development rights associated with the
property. The developer can transfer the development rights to another location ap-
proved by the local government to create more compact development on the new site.
40. Vision – A description of a realistic and credible desired future for a community or
organization.
41. Watershed – The physical land area that naturally drains into a lake, river or stream
system.
42. Wetland – An area inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency suf-
ficient to support vegetation types adapted to wet soil conditions. Wetlands include bogs,
fens, marshes and swamps.
43. Zoning – The division of a community (city, township or county) by local legislative
regulation into areas or zones that implement the comprehensive plan.
Appendix CGlossary of Terms and List of Acronyms
191Scandia Comprehensive Plan
List of Acronyms
BMP – Best Management Practice
CAMP – Citizen-Assisted Monitoring Program
CBS – County Biological Survey
CLFLWD – Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District
CMSCWD – Carnelian Marine-St Croix Watershed District
CPC – Comprehensive Plan Committee
CR – County Road
CSAH – County State Aid Highway
DNR – Department of Natural Resources
ED – Economic Development
ES – Energy Use and Systems
GB – General Business
GD – General Development Lake
GIS – Geographic Information System
GMP – Groundwater Management Plan
GPS – Global Positioning System
GR – General Rural
GW – Groundwater
H – Housing
ISTS – Individual Sewage Treatment Systems
LGU – Local Government Unit
LOS – Level of Service
LSC – Lakeshore Conservation (Overlay)
LST – Lakeshore Traditional (Overlay)
LU – Land Use
MCBS – Minnesota County Biological Survey
MLCCS – Minnesota Land Cover Classification System
MN/DOT – Minnesota Department of Transportation
MnRAM - Minnesota Rapid Assessment Model
NE – Natural Environment Lake
NR – Natural Resources
NRO – Natural Resources Overlay
NRPA – National Recreation and Park Association
NSPS – Scandia Park Search Area
NSRS – Scandia Recreation Search Area
NWI – National Wetlands Inventory
OHWL – Ordinary High Water Level
PDR – Purchase of Development Rights
QCEW – Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
RB – Retail Business
RCWD – Rice Creek Watershed District
RD – Recreational Development Lake
ROW – Right of Way
RSEA – Regionally Significant Ecological Areas
SFE – Single Family Estate
SNA – Scientific and Natural Areas
Appendix CGlossary of Terms and List of Acronyms
192 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix CGlossary of Terms and List of Acronyms
TAZ – Traffic Analysis Zones
TDR – Transfer of Development Rights
TH – Trunk Highway
TR – Transportation
USFWS – United States Fish and Wildlife Service
VMU – Village Mixed Use
VQA – Visual Quality Analysis
WCA – Wetland Conservation Act
WCHRA – Washington County Housing Redevelopment Authority
WMO – Water Management Organizations
193Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix DFuture Land Use Areas Summary Matrix
Page 1 of 7 Future Land Use Area General Description General Location – See Map for Boundaries Primary and Secondary Land Uses Density/Intensity Special Natural Resource Standards and Design Standards Image Policies that apply in all future land use areas The concept of transfer of development rights (TDR) is intriguing as a means for compensating landowners who are asked to give up development rights in order to meet community agricultural preservation or natural resource protection goals. The City of Scandia will establish a study committee to evaluate the use of TDR for achieving agricultural preservation, natural resource protection, and life-cycle and affordable housing goals. The study committee will report their conclusions to the City Council within one year after adoption of the comprehensive plan. The natural resource and design standards listed here will be city-wide policies/ strategies. See the Goals, Policies, and Strategies section of the Comprehensive Plan for a complete listing of standards. • Protect priority natural resource areas through design of subdivision and location of structures • Create design standards for screening and landscaping along public rights-of-way emphasizing the use of native plants • Stormwater management standards will be implemented including low-impact development and green building techniques (Stormwater standards shall be the same city-wide, except higher standards may apply in particularly sensitive natural resource areas such as shorelands of lakes and rivers, and areas surrounding wetlands) • To the extent possible, sustainable or “green” design standards will be applied to all land uses • Investigate building design guidelines for along major roadways
194 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix DFuture Land Use Areas Summary Matrix
Page 2 of 7 Future Land Use Area General Description General Location – See Map for Boundaries Primary and Secondary Land Uses Density/Intensity Special Natural Resource Standards and Design Standards Image Natural Resource Protection Areas On Natural Resource Priorities Map Priority natural resource areas have been identified. Areas in Scandia with priority natural resources will be protected through performance standards and/or site design standards. Development is not prohibited in these areas, but the location of structures and other site design decisions may be influenced by the presence of the natural resources. Natural Resource Protection Areas would work like an overlay and would apply wherever priority natural resource areas occur. For example, wetlands, steep slopes, high-quality natural areas, shoreland, etc. • Natural resource protection • Uses allowed in underlying land use areas Densities and lot sizes determined by underlying land use areas. • Minimum protection standards for priority resources will be established • The City will modify its development review process to ensure consideration and protection of priority natural resources • Natural resource priority areas will be protected through a variety of techniques. Techniques to be considered may include: open space conservation subdivisions, lot averaging, transfer of development rights, purchase of development rights, conservation easements, or low-impact development performance standards • The City will use information on priority natural resources to: 1. identify areas that are most critical for protection; and 2. combine the information with the parks and trails plan to identify natural connections with existing and planned parks and trails. Village Center Mixed-Use Map Designation – VMU The Village Center Mixed-Use Area recognizes the significant contribution of the existing village center to the overall community character. The mixed-use nature of the village center is to be encouraged and revitalized. New commercial, retail, and residential activity is encouraged in order to develop and redevelop areas in the Village Center. The Village Center Mixed-Use Area is the core of the existing village. Primary Land Uses • Commercial/office/retail • Public and private institutions • Civic buildings • Light industrial • Parks and recreation Secondary Land Uses • Residential - Small-lot single-family residential, townhomes, and multi-family Lot sizes similar to the existing mix of lot sizes. Consider the use of community sewer systems to allow smaller lot sizes for infill development. • In the core of the Village, buildings shall be of a size and have setbacks that reflect the “downtown” character • Minimum lot sizes are restricted only by the area necessary for sewage treatment • Commercial and light industrial design standards will be developed • Transportation connections from the eastern commercial area to the village core will be improved • Non-motorized connections shall be improved in the village area
195Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix DFuture Land Use Areas Summary Matrix
Page 3 of 8 Future Land Use Area General Description General Location – See Map for Boundaries Primary and Secondary Land Uses Density/Intensity Special Natural Resource Standards and Design Standards Image Village Neighborhood Map Designation – VN The Village Neighborhood Areas are planned extensions to the Village Center area. It designates growth areas surrounding the Village Center intended to support primarily single and multiple family residential uses on lot sizes reflective of the existing village lot sizes. The Village Neighborhood Areas are adjacent to and north, east, and west of the Village Center. • Small-lot single-family residential • Public and private institutions • Civic buildings • Parks and recreation • Townhomes and multi-family residential uses will be allowed only as an incentive for providing community value through agricultural land protection, life-cycle housing, or natural resource protection Density and minimum lot size at 1 dwelling unit per 2.5 acres. Bonus densities up to 1 dwelling unit per acre may be earned as an incentive for providing multi-family or life-cycle housing or use of transfer of development rights. Consider the use of community sewer systems to allow smaller lot sizes. Potential receiving area for TDRs Lots sizes in the Goose Lake shoreland area shall remain consistent with those allowed under the current shoreland ordinance. • Design standards shall ensure that new development is visually compatible with the village development pattern. • Street and sidewalk standards ensure that new development is well-connected to the Village Center Agricultural Preserves Overlay Not mapped The Agricultural Preserves Overlay plans for the continuation of the Agricultural Preserves Program in Scandia. This overlay is intended to encourage the continuation of agriculture through ensuring the availability of the Program to qualifying agricultural landowners. While the City of Scandia plans for long-term agriculture through the use of this Overlay, it is the choice of a landowner to enroll in the Agricultural Preserves Program. The Agricultural Preserves Overlay lies over the two primary agricultural future land use areas; the Agricultural Core Area and the General Rural Area. • Uses allowed in underlying land use areas The density of development on parcels in Agricultural Preserves Overlay and enrolled in the Agricultural Preserves Program shall be 1 unit per 40 acres.
196 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix DFuture Land Use Areas Summary Matrix
Page 4 of 7 Future Land Use Area General Description General Location – See Map for Boundaries Primary and Secondary Land Uses Density/Intensity Special Natural Resource Standards and Design Standards Image Agricultural Core Area Map Designation – AG C The Agricultural Core Area is intended to protect and encourage long-term continued agricultural production. It is anticipated that the nature of agricultural production will change in the future from traditional dairy farms to specialty agriculture and agriculture producing for local/metropolitan markets. Residential development compatible with agriculture is allowed. The Agricultural Core Area includes large contiguous areas where agricultural production is the predominant use. This Area also includes parcels enrolled in the Metro Agricultural Preserves Program. Primary land uses • Agricultural production, including “metropolitan-oriented” agriculture Secondary land uses • Single-family residential • Recreational commercial as a conditional use • Parks and recreation 4 units per 40 acre density Within the 4 per 40 density limit, a variety of lot sizes will be encouraged in the manner of the current lot averaging zoning: lots of 2 to 4 acres in size or 20 acres or greater would be allowed. Bonus densities of up to 8 units per 40 acres may be earned only if developers use the Open Space Conservation Subdivision process and undertake actions such as permanent protection of agricultural land or open space, or protection or enhancement of natural resources. To protect farmland, the City will investigate a compensation program that could include a transfer of development rights, purchase of development rights, or other program. • Continued viability of agricultural uses considered in siting of structures and drives • Open space conservation subdivisions are encouraged for subdivisions • Bonus density incentives may be offered in open space conservation subdivisions only if agricultural protection is the focal point of the subdivision design
197Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix DFuture Land Use Areas Summary Matrix
Page 5 of 8 Future Land Use Area General Description General Location – See Map for Boundaries Primary and Secondary Land Uses Density/Intensity Special Natural Resource Standards and Design Standards Image General Rural Area Map Designation – GR The General Rural Area recognizes areas of Scandia that have been developed at 10 acre average densities, but include areas with 5 acre density and larger agricultural lots of 20-40 acres. The General Rural Area is located in or adjacent to existing large lot residential areas. This Area also includes parcels enrolled in the Metro Agricultural Preserves Program. Primary land uses • Single-family residential Secondary land uses • Parks and recreation • Public and private institutions • Agriculture • Recreational commercial as a conditional use 4 units per 40 acre density with a minimum lot size of 2 acres Development in this area is anticipated to be a mix of open space conservation subdivisions and large acreage parcels depending on the nature of the land. Bonus densities of up to 75% of the base density may be earned only if developers use the Open Space Conservation Subdivision process and undertake actions such as protection or enhancement of natural resources, or permanent protection of agricultural land or open space. A possible transfer of development rights receiving area. Neighborhoods in this future land use area with densities greater than 4 units per 40 acres shall not be expanded in area. Only limited infill at less than 4 units per 40 acres will be allowed. • Open space conservation subdivisions are an option in this land use area • Incentives may be provided for open space conservation subdivisions that include bonus density to protect natural resources, scenic qualities, and farming or open space
198 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix DFuture Land Use Areas Summary Matrix
Page 6 of 8 Future Land Use Area General Description General Location – See Map for Boundaries Primary and Secondary Land Uses Density/Intensity Special Natural Resource Standards and Design Standards Image Lakeshore Traditional Overlay Map Designation – LST The Lakeshore Traditional Overlay Area recognizes lakeshore areas with traditional small-lot residential development in Tier 1 area (riparian lots). Expansion of these areas is not anticipated. Includes only existing shoreland areas with the traditional pattern of small lots • Single-family residential • Parks and recreation Densities will conform to the current City of Scandia Shoreland Ordinance; smaller lots in Tier 1 (riparian lots) and controlled by underlying zoning district in Tier 2. • Big Marine, Bone, Sylvan, and Goose Lakes – 2.5 acre minimum lot size, minimum lot width 150 feet in Tier 1 • Natural Environment (NE) Lakes other than Goose – 5 acre minimum lot size, minimum lot width 300 feet in Tier 1 No bonus density shall be available. Lakeshore Conservation Overlay Map Designation – LSC The Lakeshore Conservation Overlay Area includes sensitive lakeshore areas where development will result in relatively large negative impacts to natural resources. Open space conservation subdivision development is encouraged. In shoreland areas that are currently largely undeveloped • Single -family residential • Parks and recreation Density of 8 units per 40 acres No bonus density shall be available. • Open space conservation subdivision is encouraged using standards in current zoning ordinance • Permit development of smaller lots through open space conservation subdivision, must still not exceed the maximum density • Establish minimum dimensional standards for lots in Tier 1 (riparian lots) St. Croix River Corridor Map Designation – ST CROIX The St. Croix River Corridor recognizes the unique historical and natural resource aspects of this area of Scandia. The mapped area corresponds to areas protected under federal wild and scenic river designation. The future of this area includes very limited residential development protecting important natural and scenic shoreland areas. The St. Croix River Corridor includes the River shoreland area east of State Highway 95. • Residential • Public and private protected areas 4 units per 40 acres • Permit development of smaller lots through open space conservation subdivisions, must still not exceed maximum densities (no bonuses) • Low density pattern of development protected under federal wild and scenic river designation and through National Park Service scenic easements • Protect viewsheds in siting of structures and drives
199Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix DFuture Land Use Areas Summary Matrix
Page 7 of 8 Future Land Use Area General Description General Location – See Map for Boundaries Primary and Secondary Land Uses Density/Intensity Special Natural Resource Standards and Design Standards Image Rural Commercial Nodes The Rural Commercial Nodes future land use area is intended to support commercial development at historic commercial nodes. These areas are the only commercial areas anticipated outside of the Village Center. Rural Commercial Nodes are designated at historic commercial nodes such as the Big Marine Store at the intersection of Highways 95 and 97, and historic sites such as Copas and Otisville • Commercial uses reflecting the historic nature of the commercial node and compatible with the surrounding rural character • 2 acre minimum lot size for commercial uses • Commercial building design standards reflecting historic nature of the commercial node Recreation Area - Protected The Recreation Area – Protected land use category includes publicly-owned lands permanently protected from development. This designation recognizes that these areas will be used for recreation or open space only and not developed. State, regional, and local parks • Recreation and open space uses Not applicable • Protect priority natural resource areas if recreation facilities are planned to be developed • Restore and enhance natural resources wherever possible Recreation Area - Planned The Recreation Area – Planned land use category designates areas for future parks or park expansion. Includes areas within statutory boundaries of state parks that are not currently owned by the state. Areas within statutory boundaries of state parks and the area owned by MnDOT in the northeast corner of the City. • Recreation and open space uses Not applicable • Protect priority natural resource areas if recreation facilities are planned to be developed • Restore and enhance natural resources wherever possible Mining Area The Mining Area includes only areas with active mining operations. It is anticipated that mining activity will continue in these areas in the future. One area in northwest (with 2 operations) Scandia and one area in southeast Scandia. • Mining Not applicable • Mining uses must comply with local and state extractive use regulations • Reclamation plan must restore the natural resources of the site to a level such that the land is suitable for the planned future land uses such as agriculture or residential Scenic Roads/ Viewsheds Not mapped Scenic Roads and Viewsheds is a future land use category intended to identify areas adjacent to scenic roads that contain views important to protecting the City’s rural character. Scenic roads and viewsheds to be identified in a scenic assessment currently being completed. • Land use will be those identified in future land use areas that are adjacent to scenic roads. Not applicable • Road construction standards to protect the scenic nature of designated scenic roads • Design and locational restrictions on structures to protect scenic views
200 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix D
201Scandia Comprehensive Plan 1
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Purpose
Scandia’s Local Water Management Plan (LWMP) has been prepared to guide the City in
conserving, protecting, managing, and improving its surface water resources. The plan meets
the requirements described in Minnesota Statutes 103B and Minnesota Rules 8410. The plan
is also consistent with the goals and policies of the Metropolitan Council’s Water Resources
Management Policy Plan and the three watershed management organizations with jurisdic-
tion in the City: the Carnelian Marine St. Croix Watershed District, the Forest Lake – Com-
fort Lake Watershed District, and the Rice Creek Watershed District.
Executive Summary
Scandia’s Local Water Management Plan (LWMP) has been prepared to guide the City in
conserving, protecting, managing, and improving its surface water resources. The plan meets
the requirements described in Minnesota Statutes 103B and Minnesota Rules 8410. The plan
is also consistent with the goals and policies of the Metropolitan Council’s Water Resources
Management Policy Plan and the three watershed management organizations with jurisdic-
tion in the City: the Carnelian Marine St. Croix Watershed District, the Forest Lake – Com-
fort Lake Watershed District, and the Rice Creek Watershed District.
The LWMP contains the following sections:
• The Purpose briefl y describes the purpose of the plan.
• The Land and Water Resource Inventory summarizes available data regarding surface
water resources in Scandia.
• The Existing Water Resource Planning Framework section summarizes the exten-
sive surface water and groundwater planning efforts to-date in Scandia.
• Water Resource Related Agreements – The City has not entered into any water re-
lated agreements.
• The Assessment of Issues section describes current problems affecting water resourc-
es within the City.
• The Goals, Policies, and Implementation Strategies section lists the goals, policies,
and implementation strategies developed to address surface water management issues in
the City.
• The Financial Considerations section summarizes the projects planned to implement
goals and policies
• The Amendment Procedures outlines the process by which plan amendments will be
incorporated into the plan.
• Copies of the erosion and sediment control ordinances currently enforced by Scan-
dia are found at the end of this document.
The LWMP has been incorporated into the City’s 2008 Comprehensive Plan update and will
be applicable until 2018 when the City will be required to update the plan. Prior to 2018,
periodic amendments may be required to incorporate changes in local policies as well as
changes to the Watershed Management Plans of the watersheds with jurisdiction in the City.
202 Scandia Comprehensive Plan2 3
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Land and Water Resource Inventory
Introduction
Scandia’s landscape is a mosaic of agricultural lands, residential and commercial develop-
ment, and areas with remnant natural vegetative cover. As development continues, plans to
manage future growth should be based on a thorough understanding of the water resources
within the city’s boundaries. The purpose of this section and the Local Water Management
Plan is to summarize available information regarding natural resources in the City of Scandia
and discuss the relationship between water resources and land use planning. The section is
organized into four major topic areas:
• Water Resources
• Geology and Topography
• Natural Areas
• Existing Water Resource Planning Framework
Additional information on land and water resources within the city of Scandia can be found
in the watershed management plans of the watershed management organizations with
jurisdiction in the City and the City’s comprehensive plan. The plans include the following
additional information on land and water resources:
Water Resources
The plans are available from the following sources:
Carnelian Marine St. Croix Watershed District
2000-2010 Watershed Management Plan
An electronic copy of the plan can be requested from:
Dan Fabian, District Engineer
Emmons & Olivier Resources
651 Hale Avenue N.
Oakdale, MN 55128
Comfort-Lake Forest Lake Watershed District
2001-2011 Watershed Management Plan
The plan is available online at:
http://www.clfl wd.org/documents/CLFLWDWMPRevisionFeb_6_2008_WholeReport.pdf
Rice Creek Watershed District
1997-2007 Watershed Management Plan
The plan is available online at:
http://www.ricecreek.org/content/documents/planning/Watershed_Management_Plan.pdf
City of Scandia
2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
An electronic copy of the plan can be requested from:
Anne Hurlburt, City Administrator
14727 209th St. N.
Scandia, MN 55073
This section of the background report describes the following information related to water
resources:
• Public Waters Inventory
• Shoreland Management Lake Classifi cations
• Floodplain Areas
• Water Quality
• Watershed Boundaries
Table E1 - Summary of Additional Land and Water Resource Information
Data Type CMSCWD
WMP
CLFLWD
WMP RCWD WMP Scandia
Comp. Plan
Precipitation data
100-year fl ood levels and peak discharges
Areas of known fl ooding
Listing of Flood Insurance Studies
Listing of existing and abandoned water
quality and quantity monitoring sites
Listing of location and amount of surface
water appropriation permits
Soil data
Land use data (existing, planned, MUSA
boundary)
Water-based recreation and land ownership
Summary of biological surveys and studies
Unique features and scenic areas
Listing of pollutant sources
Public Waters Inventory
Public waters are all waterbasins and watercourses that meet the criteria set forth in Min-
nesota Statutes, Section 103G.005, subd. 15 that are identifi ed on Public Water Inventory
maps and lists authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Section 103G.201. Public waters wetlands
include all type 3, type 4, and type 5 wetlands (as defi ned in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Circular No. 39, 1971 edition) that are 10 acres or more in size in unincorporated areas or 2.5
acres or more in size in incorporated areas. Of the many wetlands and water bodies within
the City’s boundaries, 40 of them have been classifi ed as public waters in accordance with
the guidelines of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
203Scandia Comprehensive Plan2 3
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Land and Water Resource Inventory
Introduction
Scandia’s landscape is a mosaic of agricultural lands, residential and commercial develop-
ment, and areas with remnant natural vegetative cover. As development continues, plans to
manage future growth should be based on a thorough understanding of the water resources
within the city’s boundaries. The purpose of this section and the Local Water Management
Plan is to summarize available information regarding natural resources in the City of Scandia
and discuss the relationship between water resources and land use planning. The section is
organized into four major topic areas:
• Water Resources
• Geology and Topography
• Natural Areas
• Existing Water Resource Planning Framework
Additional information on land and water resources within the city of Scandia can be found
in the watershed management plans of the watershed management organizations with
jurisdiction in the City and the City’s comprehensive plan. The plans include the following
additional information on land and water resources:
Water Resources
The plans are available from the following sources:
Carnelian Marine St. Croix Watershed District
2000-2010 Watershed Management Plan
An electronic copy of the plan can be requested from:
Dan Fabian, District Engineer
Emmons & Olivier Resources
651 Hale Avenue N.
Oakdale, MN 55128
Comfort-Lake Forest Lake Watershed District
2001-2011 Watershed Management Plan
The plan is available online at:
http://www.clfl wd.org/documents/CLFLWDWMPRevisionFeb_6_2008_WholeReport.pdf
Rice Creek Watershed District
1997-2007 Watershed Management Plan
The plan is available online at:
http://www.ricecreek.org/content/documents/planning/Watershed_Management_Plan.pdf
City of Scandia
2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
An electronic copy of the plan can be requested from:
Anne Hurlburt, City Administrator
14727 209th St. N.
Scandia, MN 55073
This section of the background report describes the following information related to water
resources:
• Public Waters Inventory
• Shoreland Management Lake Classifi cations
• Floodplain Areas
• Water Quality
• Watershed Boundaries
Table E1 - Summary of Additional Land and Water Resource Information
Data TypeCMSCWD
WMP
CLFLWD
WMPRCWD WMPScandia
Comp. Plan
Precipitation data
100-year fl ood levels and peak discharges
Areas of known fl ooding
Listing of Flood Insurance Studies
Listing of existing and abandoned water
quality and quantity monitoring sites
Listing of location and amount of surface
water appropriation permits
Soil data
Land use data (existing, planned, MUSA
boundary)
Water-based recreation and land ownership
Summary of biological surveys and studies
Unique features and scenic areas
Listing of pollutant sources
Public Waters Inventory
Public waters are all waterbasins and watercourses that meet the criteria set forth in Min-
nesota Statutes, Section 103G.005, subd. 15 that are identifi ed on Public Water Inventory
maps and lists authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Section 103G.201. Public waters wetlands
include all type 3, type 4, and type 5 wetlands (as defi ned in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Circular No. 39, 1971 edition) that are 10 acres or more in size in unincorporated areas or 2.5
acres or more in size in incorporated areas. Of the many wetlands and water bodies within
the City’s boundaries, 40 of them have been classifi ed as public waters in accordance with
the guidelines of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
204 Scandia Comprehensive Plan4 5
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Name
Public Water
Inventory ID
Shoreland Management
Classifi cation Acres
Alice 82-287 P Natural Environment 26.03
Big Marine 82-052 P Recreational Development 1902.59
Bone 82-054 P Recreational Development 218.47
Clear 82-078 W Natural Environment 35.28
Elwell 82-079 W Natural Environment 18.86
Falls Creek (§1.6.7.12)Wild and Scenic -
Fish 82-064 P Natural Environment 64.99
German 82-056 P Natural Environment 151.20
Goose 82-059 P Natural Environment 84.04
Sylvan 82-080 P Recreational Development 108.25
Hay 82-065 P Natural Environment 59.32
Long 82-068 P Natural Environment 46.12
Nielson 82-055 W Natural Environment 49.65
Pitzl Pond 82-282 W Natural Environment 36.19
Rasmussen Pond 82-070 W Natural Environment 18.24
Sand 82-067 P Natural Environment 47.41
Sea 82-053 W Natural Environment 51.67
St. Croix River 82-001 P Wild and Scenic River -
Washington 82-169 W Natural Environment 22.34
White Rock 82-072 P Natural Environment 80.88
Wojtowicz Pond 82-058 W Natural Environment 16.80
Unnamed 82-057 W Natural Environment 27.52
Unnamed 82-060 W Natural Environment 26.26
Unnamed 82-061 W Natural Environment 14.37
Unnamed 82-062 W Natural Environment 17.44
Unnamed 82-066 W Natural Environment 33.75
Unnamed 82-081 W Natural Environment 41.29
Unnamed 82-171 W Natural Environment 14.54
Unnamed 82-172 W Natural Environment 26.95
Unnamed 82-173 W Natural Environment 10.49
Unnamed 82-174 W Natural Environment 26.49
Unnamed 82-210 W Natural Environment 25.12
Unnamed 82-211 W Natural Environment 10.84
Unnamed 82-212 W Natural Environment 17.46
Unnamed 82-213 W Natural Environment 10.88
Unnamed 82-280 W Natural Environment 19.48
Unnamed 82-281 W Natural Environment 7.46
Unnamed 82-283 P Natural Environment 8.46
Unnamed 82-284 P Natural Environment 2.08
Unnamed 82-285 P Natural Environment 14.73
Unnamed 82-286 P Natural Environment 5.17
Table E2 - Public waters within the City of Scandia
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Public waters within Scandia range in size from 2 acres to nearly 2,000 acres of water surface
and include several water bodies of regional signifi cance. Table E2 - Public waters within the
City of Scandia, provides information on all public waters and their acreage. The St. Croix
River, a Federally-designated National Scenic Riverway, forms the eastern border of the City.
Big Marine Lake, in the southwestern portion of the city, is the second largest lake in Wash-
ington County. Existing and future development in areas surrounding public waters should
be carefully managed and planned to prevent adverse impacts to water resources.
Shoreland Management
The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) Shoreland Management System
was developed so that appropriate development standards could be applied to the different
types of lakes found in Minnesota. This classifi cation system includes public waters basins
(lakes) greater than ten acres in size in incorporated areas that have DNR-approved shore-
land ordinances. Lakes are divided into the following classes:
• Natural Environment Lakes usually have less than 150 total acres, less than 60 acres
per mile of shoreline, and less than three dwellings per mile of shoreline. They may
have some winter kill of fi sh; may have shallow, swampy shoreline; and are less than 15
feet deep.
• Recreational Development Lakes usually have between 60 and 225 acres of water per
mile of shoreline, between 3 and 25 dwellings per mile of shoreline, and are more than
15 feet deep.
• General Development Lakes usually have more than 225 acres of water per mile of
shoreline and 25 dwellings per mile of shoreline, and are more than 15 feet deep. (Note:
no lakes in Scandia have been given this classifi cation)
Classifi cations for the lakes within the City of Scandia are shown on Map E1 - Lake Clas-
sifi cations, Shoreland, and Floodplain Areas, and listed in Table E2 - Public waters within the City of
Scandia.
While the lakes in Scandia are one of the reasons that the city is an attractive place to live,
residential development on these lakes can have detrimental effects on water quality and
wildlife habitat. One of the primary concerns is the impact of impervious surfaces on water
quality. In order to protect lakes from the negative impacts of development, the State of
Minnesota requires cities and counties to adopt a shoreland management ordinance that pro-
vides for the orderly development and protection of shorelands. When New Scandia Town-
ship incorporated as the City of Scandia, the city developed and adopted its own Shoreland
Management Ordinance in 2007.
The Shoreland Management Ordinance applies to land located within the following distances
from lakes that have been given a lake shoreland management classifi cation or rivers and
streams that are considered public waters:
• 1,000 feet from the ordinary high water level of a lake, pond, or fl owage
• 300 feet from a river or stream, or the landward extent of a fl oodplain designated by
ordinance on a river or stream, whichever is greater.
Shoreland Areas within Scandia are shown on Map E1 - Lake Classifi cations, Shoreland, and
Floodplain Areas.
205Scandia Comprehensive Plan4 5
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Name
Public Water
Inventory ID
Shoreland Management
Classifi cationAcres
Alice82-287 PNatural Environment26.03
Big Marine82-052 PRecreational Development1902.59
Bone82-054 PRecreational Development218.47
Clear82-078 WNatural Environment35.28
Elwell82-079 WNatural Environment18.86
Falls Creek (§1.6.7.12)Wild and Scenic-
Fish82-064 PNatural Environment64.99
German82-056 PNatural Environment151.20
Goose82-059 PNatural Environment84.04
Sylvan82-080 PRecreational Development108.25
Hay82-065 PNatural Environment59.32
Long82-068 PNatural Environment46.12
Nielson82-055 WNatural Environment49.65
Pitzl Pond82-282 WNatural Environment36.19
Rasmussen Pond82-070 WNatural Environment18.24
Sand82-067 PNatural Environment47.41
Sea82-053 WNatural Environment51.67
St. Croix River82-001 PWild and Scenic River-
Washington82-169 WNatural Environment22.34
White Rock82-072 PNatural Environment80.88
Wojtowicz Pond82-058 WNatural Environment16.80
Unnamed82-057 WNatural Environment27.52
Unnamed82-060 WNatural Environment26.26
Unnamed82-061 WNatural Environment14.37
Unnamed82-062 WNatural Environment17.44
Unnamed82-066 WNatural Environment33.75
Unnamed82-081 WNatural Environment41.29
Unnamed82-171 WNatural Environment14.54
Unnamed82-172 WNatural Environment26.95
Unnamed82-173 WNatural Environment10.49
Unnamed82-174 WNatural Environment26.49
Unnamed82-210 WNatural Environment25.12
Unnamed82-211 WNatural Environment10.84
Unnamed82-212 WNatural Environment17.46
Unnamed82-213 WNatural Environment10.88
Unnamed82-280 WNatural Environment19.48
Unnamed82-281 WNatural Environment7.46
Unnamed82-283 PNatural Environment8.46
Unnamed82-284 PNatural Environment2.08
Unnamed82-285 PNatural Environment14.73
Unnamed82-286 PNatural Environment5.17
Table E2 - Public waters within the City of Scandia
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Public waters within Scandia range in size from 2 acres to nearly 2,000 acres of water surface
and include several water bodies of regional signifi cance. Table E2 - Public waters within the
City of Scandia, provides information on all public waters and their acreage. The St. Croix
River, a Federally-designated National Scenic Riverway, forms the eastern border of the City.
Big Marine Lake, in the southwestern portion of the city, is the second largest lake in Wash-
ington County. Existing and future development in areas surrounding public waters should
be carefully managed and planned to prevent adverse impacts to water resources.
Shoreland Management
The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) Shoreland Management System
was developed so that appropriate development standards could be applied to the different
types of lakes found in Minnesota. This classifi cation system includes public waters basins
(lakes) greater than ten acres in size in incorporated areas that have DNR-approved shore-
land ordinances. Lakes are divided into the following classes:
• Natural Environment Lakes usually have less than 150 total acres, less than 60 acres
per mile of shoreline, and less than three dwellings per mile of shoreline. They may
have some winter kill of fi sh; may have shallow, swampy shoreline; and are less than 15
feet deep.
• Recreational Development Lakes usually have between 60 and 225 acres of water per
mile of shoreline, between 3 and 25 dwellings per mile of shoreline, and are more than
15 feet deep.
• General Development Lakes usually have more than 225 acres of water per mile of
shoreline and 25 dwellings per mile of shoreline, and are more than 15 feet deep. (Note:
no lakes in Scandia have been given this classifi cation)
Classifi cations for the lakes within the City of Scandia are shown on Map E1 - Lake Clas-
sifi cations, Shoreland, and Floodplain Areas, and listed in Table E2 - Public waters within the City of
Scandia.
While the lakes in Scandia are one of the reasons that the city is an attractive place to live,
residential development on these lakes can have detrimental effects on water quality and
wildlife habitat. One of the primary concerns is the impact of impervious surfaces on water
quality. In order to protect lakes from the negative impacts of development, the State of
Minnesota requires cities and counties to adopt a shoreland management ordinance that pro-
vides for the orderly development and protection of shorelands. When New Scandia Town-
ship incorporated as the City of Scandia, the city developed and adopted its own Shoreland
Management Ordinance in 2007.
The Shoreland Management Ordinance applies to land located within the following distances
from lakes that have been given a lake shoreland management classifi cation or rivers and
streams that are considered public waters:
• 1,000 feet from the ordinary high water level of a lake, pond, or fl owage
• 300 feet from a river or stream, or the landward extent of a fl oodplain designated by
ordinance on a river or stream, whichever is greater.
Shoreland Areas within Scandia are shown on Map E1 - Lake Classifi cations, Shoreland, and
Floodplain Areas.
206 Scandia Comprehensive Plan6 7
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Map E1 - Lake Classifi cations, Shoreland, and Floodplain Areas
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
CMSCWD
CLFLWD
RCWD
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
82-52 P
82-54 P
82-56 P
82-59 P
82-72 P
82-80 P
82-64 P
82-65 P
82-53 W
82-67 P
82-55 W
82-68 P
82-78 W
82-282 W
82-287 P
82-169 W
82-70 W
82-58 W
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr NKeystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr NSaint Croix Tr NM
ayberry Tr N Olinda Tr N1 7 7 t h S t N
City of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Lake Classifications, Shoreland, and Floodplain AreasLake Classifications, Shoreland, and Floodplain Areas
Sh oreland
Lake Shoreland Classification
Natural Environment
Recreational Development
FEMA Floodplain
100 yr. Floodplain
500 yr. Floodplain
City Boundary
Section Lines
Open Water
Streams
Watershed Districts
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
Data Sources: MN DNR
Metropolitan Council
May 17, 2008
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Floodplain Areas
The fl ood plains shown on this map were digitized from the Federal Emergency Manage-
ment Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map for Washington County. Floodplains were delineat-
ed for the St. Croix River and some of the larger lakes in the City of Scandia including Big
Marine Lake, Long Lake, Fish Lake and Hay Lake. Map E1 - Lake Classifi cations, Shoreland,
and Floodplain Areas, shows the extent of the 100-year and 500-year fl ood plains for water
bodies in the City of Scandia.
Water Quality/Impaired Waters
In 2006, 11 lakes in the City of Scandia were monitored as part of the Metropolitan Coun-
cil’s Citizen-Assisted Monitoring Program (CAMP). Lakes are sampled every two weeks
from mid-April through mid-October. During each sampling event, temperature, dissolved
oxygen, and Secchi depth transparency are measured and recorded. A surface water sample
is also collected and analyzed for total phosphorus, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, and chlorophyll-
a. Total phosphorus is a key measure of lake nutrients, chlorophyll-a is a measure of algae
abundance, and Secchi depth transparency is a measure of water clarity. Map E2 - 2006
Water Quality Grade, shows the 2006 water quality grades for lakes in the City.
The Metropolitan Council uses the monitoring data to assign each lake a water quality grade
using an A through F grading system. The grading system uses percentile ranges for three
water quality indicators-summertime average values for total phosphorus, chlorophyll-a, and
Secchi depth transparency. An overall grade is calculated as the average grade for the three
individual grades. The overall grade for 2006 is displayed on Map E2 - 2006 Water Quality
Grade. The majority of monitored lakes in the City were given a “C” grade, including Big
Marine Lake, Bone Lake, Goose Lake, Hay Lake, and Long Lake. White Rock Lake, Fish
Lake and Jellum’s Bay on Big Marine Lake were given a “D” grade.
Under the federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C) the MPCA is required to set standards and
assess Minnesota waters for impairments. The standards are set on a wide range of pollut-
ants, including bacteria, nutrients, turbidity and mercury. A water body is listed as impaired
by the MPCA if it fails to meet one or more water quality standards. If a water body is listed
as impaired, a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) must be established for the pollutant. A
TMDL implementation plan will then be designed to reduce the pollutant loading to meet
the TMDL. Scandia will be required to participate in TMDL plans for impaired water bod-
ies within its borders. In Scandia the following water lakes are listed as impaired because of
excessive nutrients; Big Marine, Bone, Fish, Goose, Hay, Long, and Sand. Big Marine Lake is
also listed as impaired because of mercury pollution. The St. Croix River is listed as im-
paired for mercury and polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB).
Watershed Boundaries
The City of Scandia contains portions of three watershed management organizations: the
Carnelian Marine-St Croix Watershed District (CMSCWD), the Comfort Lake-Forest Lake
Watershed District (CLFLWD), and the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). The
northwest corner of the City is part of the CLFLWD and drains to the Sunrise River which
eventually drains to the St. Croix River. A very small area in the southwest part of the City
drains to the RCWD and the Mississippi River. The remainder of the City is within the
207Scandia Comprehensive Plan6 7
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Map E1 - Lake Classifi cations, Shoreland, and Floodplain Areas
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
CMSCWD
CLFLWD
RCWD
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
82-52 P
82-54 P
82-56 P
82-59 P
82-72 P
82-80 P
82-64 P
82-65 P
82-53 W
82-67 P
82-55 W
82-68 P
82-78 W
82-282 W
82-287 P
82-169 W
82-70 W
82-58 W
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th St N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St NPilar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
Ostrum Tr
188th St NPomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr NKeystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr NSaint Croix Tr NM
ayberry Tr NOlinda Tr N177th St N
City of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
010.5
Miles
Lake Classifications, Shoreland, and Floodplain AreasLake Classifications, Shoreland, and Floodplain Areas
Shoreland
Lake Shoreland Classification
Natural Environment
Recreational Development
FEMA Floodplain
100 yr. Floodplain
500 yr. Floodplain
City Boundary
Section Lines
Open Water
Streams
Watershed Districts
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
Data Sources: MN DNR
Metropolitan Council
May 17, 2008
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Floodplain Areas
The fl ood plains shown on this map were digitized from the Federal Emergency Manage-
ment Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map for Washington County. Floodplains were delineat-
ed for the St. Croix River and some of the larger lakes in the City of Scandia including Big
Marine Lake, Long Lake, Fish Lake and Hay Lake. Map E1 - Lake Classifi cations, Shoreland,
and Floodplain Areas, shows the extent of the 100-year and 500-year fl ood plains for water
bodies in the City of Scandia.
Water Quality/Impaired Waters
In 2006, 11 lakes in the City of Scandia were monitored as part of the Metropolitan Coun-
cil’s Citizen-Assisted Monitoring Program (CAMP). Lakes are sampled every two weeks
from mid-April through mid-October. During each sampling event, temperature, dissolved
oxygen, and Secchi depth transparency are measured and recorded. A surface water sample
is also collected and analyzed for total phosphorus, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, and chlorophyll-
a. Total phosphorus is a key measure of lake nutrients, chlorophyll-a is a measure of algae
abundance, and Secchi depth transparency is a measure of water clarity. Map E2 - 2006
Water Quality Grade, shows the 2006 water quality grades for lakes in the City.
The Metropolitan Council uses the monitoring data to assign each lake a water quality grade
using an A through F grading system. The grading system uses percentile ranges for three
water quality indicators-summertime average values for total phosphorus, chlorophyll-a, and
Secchi depth transparency. An overall grade is calculated as the average grade for the three
individual grades. The overall grade for 2006 is displayed on Map E2 - 2006 Water Quality
Grade. The majority of monitored lakes in the City were given a “C” grade, including Big
Marine Lake, Bone Lake, Goose Lake, Hay Lake, and Long Lake. White Rock Lake, Fish
Lake and Jellum’s Bay on Big Marine Lake were given a “D” grade.
Under the federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C) the MPCA is required to set standards and
assess Minnesota waters for impairments. The standards are set on a wide range of pollut-
ants, including bacteria, nutrients, turbidity and mercury. A water body is listed as impaired
by the MPCA if it fails to meet one or more water quality standards. If a water body is listed
as impaired, a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) must be established for the pollutant. A
TMDL implementation plan will then be designed to reduce the pollutant loading to meet
the TMDL. Scandia will be required to participate in TMDL plans for impaired water bod-
ies within its borders. In Scandia the following water lakes are listed as impaired because of
excessive nutrients; Big Marine, Bone, Fish, Goose, Hay, Long, and Sand. Big Marine Lake is
also listed as impaired because of mercury pollution. The St. Croix River is listed as im-
paired for mercury and polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB).
Watershed Boundaries
The City of Scandia contains portions of three watershed management organizations: the
Carnelian Marine-St Croix Watershed District (CMSCWD), the Comfort Lake-Forest Lake
Watershed District (CLFLWD), and the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). The
northwest corner of the City is part of the CLFLWD and drains to the Sunrise River which
eventually drains to the St. Croix River. A very small area in the southwest part of the City
drains to the RCWD and the Mississippi River. The remainder of the City is within the
208 Scandia Comprehensive Plan8 9
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Map E2 - 2006 Water Quality Grade
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Map E3 - Watershed District Boundaries and Minor Watershed Boundaries !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!
!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!
!
!!!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!
!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!
!!!!!
!
!
!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Carnelian Marine St Croix
Watershed District
Comfort Lake
Forest Lake
Watershed District
Rice
Creek
Watershed
District
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
2 0 5 t h S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNo
l
a
n
A
v
e
NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Margo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Watershed District Boundaries and
Minor Watershed Boundaries
Watershed District Boundaries and
Minor Watershed Boundaries
!!!!!!!!Minor Watersheds
Watershed District
City Boundary
Section Lines
Streams
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
Data Sources: MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council
June 7, 2008
Boundaries
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
CMSCWD
CLFLWD
RCWD
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNo
l
a
n
A
v
e
NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
2006 Water Quality Grade2006 Water Quality Grade
2006 Water Quality Grade
A
B
C
D
Not Monitored
City Boundary
Section Lines
Watershed Districts
Streams
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
Data Sources: MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council
November 11, 2008
209Scandia Comprehensive Plan8 9
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Map E2 - 2006 Water Quality Grade
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Map E3 - Watershed District Boundaries and Minor Watershed Boundaries !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!
!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!
!
!!!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!
!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!
!!!!!
!
!
!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Carnelian Marine St Croix
Watershed District
Comfort Lake
Forest Lake
Watershed District
Rice
Creek
Watershed
District
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
2 0 5 t h S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNo
l
a
n
A
v
e
NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Margo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Watershed District Boundaries and
Minor Watershed Boundaries
Watershed District Boundaries and
Minor Watershed Boundaries
!!!!!!!!Minor Watersheds
Watershed District
City Boundary
Section Lines
Streams
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
Data Sources: MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council
June 7, 2008
Boundaries
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
CMSCWD
CLFLWD
RCWD
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th St N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNo
l
a
n
A
v
e
NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St NPilar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
Ostrum Tr
188th St NPomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
177th St NOld Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
010.5
Miles
2006 Water Quality Grade2006 Water Quality Grade
2006 Water Quality Grade
A
B
C
D
Not Monitored
City Boundary
Section Lines
Watershed Districts
Streams
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
Data Sources: MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council
November 11, 2008
210 Scandia Comprehensive Plan10 11
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
CMSCWD which drains to the St. Croix
River in two ways:
• Land in the central and southern
portions of the City, Big Marine
Lake, Mud Lake, and Turtle Lake
drain eventually to Little Carnelian
Lake; a man-made outlet on the
Lake connects to the St. Croix River.
• Land in the eastern portion of the
City drains directly to the St. Croix
River.
Geology & Topography
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Sensitivity to Groundwater Pollution -
Prairie du Chien and Jordan Aquifers
Sensitivity to Groundwater Pollution -
Prairie du Chien and Jordan Aquifers
GW Pollution Sensitivity
Very High
High
High - Moderate
Moderate
Low - Moderate
Low
Very Low
City Boundary
Section Lines
Open Water
Streams Data Sources: MN DNR;
MN Geological Survey,
Metropolitan Council
May 18, 2008
Map E4 - Sensitivity to Groundwater Pollution - Prairie du Chien and Jordan Aquifers
Watershed Name Size (acres)Percent of City
Carnelian Marine-St Croix
Watershed District
17,488 78.0 %
Comfort Lake-Forest Lake
Watershed District
4,443 19.8 %
Rice Creek Watershed
District
495 0.2 %
TOTAL 22,426 100.0 %
Table E3 - Watershed Districts in the City of Scandia
Source: Water and Soil Resources; Metropolitan Council
The boundaries of the watersheds are shown on Map E3 - Watershed District Boundaries and
Minor Watershed Boundaries. Table E3 - Watershed Districts in the City of Scandia, summarizes the
size of each watershed within the City.
Each watershed management organization is required by the State of Minnesota to update
their Watershed Management Plan every 10 years. After a plan is approved by the Board
of Water and Soil Resources, the watershed district requires each city or township within its
boundaries to create and implement their own local water management plan consistent with
the watershed’s plan. Each city or township is then required to adopt, amend, or update its
local controls to meet watershed district standards. Establishing relationships with these
watershed districts prior to the development of their plans will help ensure that Scandia is
involved in the development of any standards or other controls affecting land use and devel-
opment within the city’s boundaries.
This part of the Current Conditions Section describes the following information related to
geology and topography:
• Surfi cial geology
• Sensitivity to groundwater pollution
• Extent of known sand and gravel deposits
• Topography
Surfi cial geology
Materials present at the surface of the landscape in the City of Scandia were created by
glacial and post glacial processes. Glacial materials present at the surface were deposited in
two glacial episodes, the Wisconsin and the Des Moines. The Wisconsin Age ended about
25,000 years ago. Late in the Wisconsin Age, the Superior Lobe advanced south from the
Lake Superior region, leaving moraine and outwash deposits in Washington County. The St.
Croix end moraine has relatively high topography that extends northeast-southwest through
the northern part of Washington County.
The Des Moines Lobe glaciation, the fi nal glacial episode in Minnesota, ended about 10,000
years ago. The Grantsburg Sublobe of the Des Moines Lobe moved from southwest to
northeast through the northwest corner of the Washington County, leaving deposits along
the western edge of the City of Scandia. This unusual south to north moving glacier depos-
ited a lateral moraine and outwash deposits. The tills related to the Des Moines Lobe glacia-
211Scandia Comprehensive Plan10 11
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
CMSCWD which drains to the St. Croix
River in two ways:
• Land in the central and southern
portions of the City, Big Marine
Lake, Mud Lake, and Turtle Lake
drain eventually to Little Carnelian
Lake; a man-made outlet on the
Lake connects to the St. Croix River.
• Land in the eastern portion of the
City drains directly to the St. Croix
River.
Geology & Topography
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Sensitivity to Groundwater Pollution -
Prairie du Chien and Jordan Aquifers
Sensitivity to Groundwater Pollution -
Prairie du Chien and Jordan Aquifers
GW Pollution Sensitivity
Very High
High
High - Moderate
Moderate
Low - Moderate
Low
Very Low
City Boundary
Section Lines
Open Water
Streams Data Sources: MN DNR;
MN Geological Survey,
Metropolitan Council
May 18, 2008
Map E4 - Sensitivity to Groundwater Pollution - Prairie du Chien and Jordan Aquifers
Watershed NameSize (acres)Percent of City
Carnelian Marine-St Croix
Watershed District
17,48878.0 %
Comfort Lake-Forest Lake
Watershed District
4,44319.8 %
Rice Creek Watershed
District
4950.2 %
TOTAL22,426100.0 %
Table E3 - Watershed Districts in the City of Scandia
Source: Water and Soil Resources; Metropolitan Council
The boundaries of the watersheds are shown on Map E3 - Watershed District Boundaries and
Minor Watershed Boundaries. Table E3 - Watershed Districts in the City of Scandia, summarizes the
size of each watershed within the City.
Each watershed management organization is required by the State of Minnesota to update
their Watershed Management Plan every 10 years. After a plan is approved by the Board
of Water and Soil Resources, the watershed district requires each city or township within its
boundaries to create and implement their own local water management plan consistent with
the watershed’s plan. Each city or township is then required to adopt, amend, or update its
local controls to meet watershed district standards. Establishing relationships with these
watershed districts prior to the development of their plans will help ensure that Scandia is
involved in the development of any standards or other controls affecting land use and devel-
opment within the city’s boundaries.
This part of the Current Conditions Section describes the following information related to
geology and topography:
• Surfi cial geology
• Sensitivity to groundwater pollution
• Extent of known sand and gravel deposits
• Topography
Surfi cial geology
Materials present at the surface of the landscape in the City of Scandia were created by
glacial and post glacial processes. Glacial materials present at the surface were deposited in
two glacial episodes, the Wisconsin and the Des Moines. The Wisconsin Age ended about
25,000 years ago. Late in the Wisconsin Age, the Superior Lobe advanced south from the
Lake Superior region, leaving moraine and outwash deposits in Washington County. The St.
Croix end moraine has relatively high topography that extends northeast-southwest through
the northern part of Washington County.
The Des Moines Lobe glaciation, the fi nal glacial episode in Minnesota, ended about 10,000
years ago. The Grantsburg Sublobe of the Des Moines Lobe moved from southwest to
northeast through the northwest corner of the Washington County, leaving deposits along
the western edge of the City of Scandia. This unusual south to north moving glacier depos-
ited a lateral moraine and outwash deposits. The tills related to the Des Moines Lobe glacia-
212 Scandia Comprehensive Plan12 13
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Manning Tr NMel
a
ni
e Tr
NOxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr
NOlinda Tr NMayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Surficial GeologySurficial Geology
Bedrock Near Surface
Floodplain Alluvium (loamy)
Floodplain Alluvium (sandy)
Glacial Till, Sand and Gravel
Ice Contact Deposit
Lacustrine Deposits
Lacustrine Sand and Silt
Lake Sand (Des Moines)
Lower Terraces
Middle Terraces
Mixed Till (Des Moines)
Modern Lakes and Rivers
Organic Deposits
Outwash (Des Moines)
Outwash (Superior)
Till (Superior)
Middle R. Warren terrace
Upper R. Warren terrace Data Sources: MN DNR
Metropolitan Council
May 18, 2008
Map E5 - Surfi cial Geology
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Sensitivity to groundwater pollution
The 1990 Washington County Geology Atlas identifi es areas of sensitivity to groundwater
pollution. Map E4 - Sensitivity to Groundwater Pollution - Prairie Du Chien and Jordan Aquifers,
shows areas that are susceptible to groundwater pollution in Scandia. The areas of highest
sensitivity are located along the St. Croix River and near some lakes in the western portion
of the city. The classifi cations are derived both from the type of material overlying the aqui-
fer as well as the amount of material. Areas that are more sensitive to pollution may have
less material overlying the aquifer or the materials are fractured or structured in a way that
allows surface water to reach the aquifer more quickly than in other areas. Map E4 - Sensitiv-
ity to Groundwater Pollution - Prairie Du Chien and Jordan Aquifers, shows the sensitivity of wells
in the Prairie Du Chien and Jordan Aquifers to groundwater pollution.
Groundwater provides all of the drinking water for the City of Scandia. Land uses that
have the potential to generate pollutants should be limited to areas where the sensitivity to
groundwater pollution is low.
Extent of known sand and gravel deposits
In 2000, the Metropolitan Council, the Department of Natural Resources and the Minnesota
Geological Survey collaborated on an aggregate resource inventory of the seven-county met-
ropolitan area. The inventory identifi ed and categorized likely areas of dolostone deposits,
and sand and gravel deposits. Areas identifi ed as “dolostone” represent signifi cant potential
ing material, relationship to water table, and reliability of the mapping. Map E6 - Extent of
Sand and Gravel Deposits, shows the extent of known sand and gravel deposits and the loca-
tion of dolostone deposits within the City of Scandia. Table E4 - Acreage of known sand and
gravel deposits, summarizes the estimated area of the dolostone deposits and the categories of
sand and gravel deposits found in the City of Scandia.
Aggregate plays two important roles in development: as a base for pavements and other
structures, and as a principal ingredient in concrete. The proximity of aggregate to a de-
velopment site is an important component in the cost of aggregate and the overall cost of
development. However, population growth and the subsequent demand for land can make
securing sand and gravel deposit lands within a reasonable distance of development sites
Table E4 - Acreage of known sand and gravel deposits
Deposit Type Size (acres)
Dolostone 62
Sand & Gravel Deposit, good to excellent quality 649
Sand & Gravel Deposit, moderate to good quality 254
Source: Metropolitan Council
deposits of Prairie du Chien dolos-
tone suitable for crushed aggregate
with less than 10 feet of overbur-
den. The sand and gravel deposits
are classifi ed into three categories
according to type and quality (based
on percent of gravel content), thick-
ness of deposit, amount of overly-
tion are more compact, have more clay, and have lower hydraulic conductivity in general than
the Superior Lobe tills. Map E5 - Surfi cial Geology, shows the surfi cial geology for the City of
Scandia.
Geologic landforms and processes infl uence other important natural features including to-
pography, soil characteristics like infi ltration rates and nutrient content, sensitivity to ground-
water pollution, and the development of plant communities.
213Scandia Comprehensive Plan12 13
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th St N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St NPilar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Manning Tr NMel
a
ni
e Tr
NOxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
Ostrum Tr
188th St NPomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr
NOlinda Tr NMayberry Tr N
177th St NOld Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
010.5
Miles
Surficial GeologySurficial Geology
Bedrock Near Surface
Floodplain Alluvium (loamy)
Floodplain Alluvium (sandy)
Glacial Till, Sand and Gravel
Ice Contact Deposit
Lacustrine Deposits
Lacustrine Sand and Silt
Lake Sand (Des Moines)
Lower Terraces
Middle Terraces
Mixed Till (Des Moines)
Modern Lakes and Rivers
Organic Deposits
Outwash (Des Moines)
Outwash (Superior)
Till (Superior)
Middle R. Warren terrace
Upper R. Warren terraceData Sources: MN DNR
Metropolitan Council
May 18, 2008
Map E5 - Surfi cial Geology
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Sensitivity to groundwater pollution
The 1990 Washington County Geology Atlas identifi es areas of sensitivity to groundwater
pollution. Map E4 - Sensitivity to Groundwater Pollution - Prairie Du Chien and Jordan Aquifers,
shows areas that are susceptible to groundwater pollution in Scandia. The areas of highest
sensitivity are located along the St. Croix River and near some lakes in the western portion
of the city. The classifi cations are derived both from the type of material overlying the aqui-
fer as well as the amount of material. Areas that are more sensitive to pollution may have
less material overlying the aquifer or the materials are fractured or structured in a way that
allows surface water to reach the aquifer more quickly than in other areas. Map E4 - Sensitiv-
ity to Groundwater Pollution - Prairie Du Chien and Jordan Aquifers, shows the sensitivity of wells
in the Prairie Du Chien and Jordan Aquifers to groundwater pollution.
Groundwater provides all of the drinking water for the City of Scandia. Land uses that
have the potential to generate pollutants should be limited to areas where the sensitivity to
groundwater pollution is low.
Extent of known sand and gravel deposits
In 2000, the Metropolitan Council, the Department of Natural Resources and the Minnesota
Geological Survey collaborated on an aggregate resource inventory of the seven-county met-
ropolitan area. The inventory identifi ed and categorized likely areas of dolostone deposits,
and sand and gravel deposits. Areas identifi ed as “dolostone” represent signifi cant potential
ing material, relationship to water table, and reliability of the mapping. Map E6 - Extent of
Sand and Gravel Deposits, shows the extent of known sand and gravel deposits and the loca-
tion of dolostone deposits within the City of Scandia. Table E4 - Acreage of known sand and
gravel deposits, summarizes the estimated area of the dolostone deposits and the categories of
sand and gravel deposits found in the City of Scandia.
Aggregate plays two important roles in development: as a base for pavements and other
structures, and as a principal ingredient in concrete. The proximity of aggregate to a de-
velopment site is an important component in the cost of aggregate and the overall cost of
development. However, population growth and the subsequent demand for land can make
securing sand and gravel deposit lands within a reasonable distance of development sites
Table E4 - Acreage of known sand and gravel deposits
Deposit Type Size (acres)
Dolostone 62
Sand & Gravel Deposit, good to excellent quality 649
Sand & Gravel Deposit, moderate to good quality 254
Source: Metropolitan Council
deposits of Prairie du Chien dolos-
tone suitable for crushed aggregate
with less than 10 feet of overbur-
den. The sand and gravel deposits
are classifi ed into three categories
according to type and quality (based
on percent of gravel content), thick-
ness of deposit, amount of overly-
tion are more compact, have more clay, and have lower hydraulic conductivity in general than
the Superior Lobe tills. Map E5 - Surfi cial Geology, shows the surfi cial geology for the City of
Scandia.
Geologic landforms and processes infl uence other important natural features including to-
pography, soil characteristics like infi ltration rates and nutrient content, sensitivity to ground-
water pollution, and the development of plant communities.
214 Scandia Comprehensive Plan14 15
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Map E6 - Extent of Sand and Gravel Deposits
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
This part of the Land and Water Resource Inventory describes the following information
related to natural resources:
• Original Vegetation
• Natural areas
• High quality natural areas
Table E5 - Acreage of natural areas
Natural Area Type Size (acres)
Forest 3,720
Woodland 1,720
Shrubland 1
Grassland 1,761
Sparse Vegetation 3
Forested Wetland 879
Shrub Wetland 315
Herbaceous Wetland 1,643
Sparse Wetland Vegetation 14
Open Water 3,051
TOTAL 13,107
Source: City of Scandia MLCCS
of remaining natural areas is included
in the MLCCS. Approximately 58% of
the land cover in the City of Scandia is
classifi ed as some form of natural area.
Map E7 - Natural Areas, shows remaining
natural areas within the City and Table
E5 - Acreage of natural areas, summarizes
the acreage of each type of natural area
within the City.
Additional development within the City
of Scandia has the potential to further
impact the patchwork of remaining
natural areas by fragmenting habitat and
introducing invasive species.
Natural Areas
• Regionally signifi cant natural areas
• National Wetland Inventory
• Wetland Assessment Status
Original Vegetation
Scandia’s original vegetation was the result of glacial processes that created the topographic
landscape features and soil types. For example, along the St. Croix River, rich alluvial soils
and periodic fl ooding led to the development of fl oodplain forests. As the landscape was
modifi ed during European settlement, most natural communities on soils suitable for crop
production were cleared for planting. Natural areas on steep slopes, hydric soils, and poor
soils were left alone or used as pasture. As a result, Scandia’s landscape today is a mosaic of
agricultural lands, residential and commercial development, and remaining areas of natural
cover.
Existing Natural Areas
Existing land cover in the City of Scandia was mapped using the Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources’ (MN DNR) Minnesota Land Cover Classifi cation System (MLCCS).
MLCCS combines the Minnesota Natural Heritage native plant community types with a cul-
tural classifi cation system to distinguish among different types and amounts of land cover,
vegetation and impervious surfaces. Information on the location, type, size, and quality
challenging. Land use and other environmental controls should consider the importance of
readily available aggregate to growth and plan to extract it from appropriate sites prior to
development. This reduces overall construction costs and provides an opportunity to plan
for an alternate use of the property following extraction of the resource.
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Clear Lake
Sylvan Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
a
ris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Margo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr
NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Extent of Sand and Gravel DepositsExtent of Sand and Gravel Deposits
Permitted Gravel Pits
Dolostone
Aggregate Resources
Class 4, 5
Moderate to Excellent
Previous Sand & Gravel Pits
City Boundary
Section Lines
Open Water
Streams
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road Data Sources: MN DNR;
MN Geological Survey,
Metropolitan Council
November 16, 2008
215Scandia Comprehensive Plan14 15
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Map E6 - Extent of Sand and Gravel Deposits
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
This part of the Land and Water Resource Inventory describes the following information
related to natural resources:
• Original Vegetation
• Natural areas
• High quality natural areas
Table E5 - Acreage of natural areas
Natural Area Type Size (acres)
Forest 3,720
Woodland 1,720
Shrubland 1
Grassland 1,761
Sparse Vegetation 3
Forested Wetland 879
Shrub Wetland 315
Herbaceous Wetland 1,643
Sparse Wetland Vegetation 14
Open Water 3,051
TOTAL 13,107
Source: City of Scandia MLCCS
of remaining natural areas is included
in the MLCCS. Approximately 58% of
the land cover in the City of Scandia is
classifi ed as some form of natural area.
Map E7 - Natural Areas, shows remaining
natural areas within the City and Table
E5 - Acreage of natural areas, summarizes
the acreage of each type of natural area
within the City.
Additional development within the City
of Scandia has the potential to further
impact the patchwork of remaining
natural areas by fragmenting habitat and
introducing invasive species.
Natural Areas
• Regionally signifi cant natural areas
• National Wetland Inventory
• Wetland Assessment Status
Original Vegetation
Scandia’s original vegetation was the result of glacial processes that created the topographic
landscape features and soil types. For example, along the St. Croix River, rich alluvial soils
and periodic fl ooding led to the development of fl oodplain forests. As the landscape was
modifi ed during European settlement, most natural communities on soils suitable for crop
production were cleared for planting. Natural areas on steep slopes, hydric soils, and poor
soils were left alone or used as pasture. As a result, Scandia’s landscape today is a mosaic of
agricultural lands, residential and commercial development, and remaining areas of natural
cover.
Existing Natural Areas
Existing land cover in the City of Scandia was mapped using the Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources’ (MN DNR) Minnesota Land Cover Classifi cation System (MLCCS).
MLCCS combines the Minnesota Natural Heritage native plant community types with a cul-
tural classifi cation system to distinguish among different types and amounts of land cover,
vegetation and impervious surfaces. Information on the location, type, size, and quality
challenging. Land use and other environmental controls should consider the importance of
readily available aggregate to growth and plan to extract it from appropriate sites prior to
development. This reduces overall construction costs and provides an opportunity to plan
for an alternate use of the property following extraction of the resource.
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Clear Lake
Sylvan Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th St N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St NPilar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
Ostrum Tr
188th St NPomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
a
ris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Margo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr
NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
177th St NOld Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
010.5
Miles
Extent of Sand and Gravel DepositsExtent of Sand and Gravel Deposits
Permitted Gravel Pits
Dolostone
Aggregate Resources
Class 4, 5
Moderate to Excellent
Previous Sand & Gravel Pits
City Boundary
Section Lines
Open Water
Streams
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other RoadData Sources: MN DNR;
MN Geological Survey,
Metropolitan Council
November 16, 2008
216 Scandia Comprehensive Plan16 17
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
a
ris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr
NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Natural AreasNatural Areas
Forest
Woodland
Shrubland
Grassland
Sparse Vegetation
Forested Wetland
Shrub Wetland
Herbaceous Wetland
Sparse Wetland Vegetation
Open Water
City Boundary
Section Lines
Streams
Data Sources: MN DNR;
Metropolitan Council
May 18, 2008
Map E7 - Natural Areas
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Quality of Natural Areas
There are two different measures of high quality natural areas:
• Natural area quality grades included in the MLCCS
• Minnesota County Biological Survey (MCBS) Sites of Biodiversity Signifi cance
Natural area quality grades using an A through F grading system are collected as part of the
MLCCS. Natural areas given a grade of A, AB, B, or BC are considered high quality and are
displayed on Map E8 - High Quality Natural Areas. There are approximately 1,270 acres of
high quality areas within the City of Scandia using this measure.
MCBS Sites of Biodiversity Signifi cance are also displayed on Map E8 - High Quality Natural
Areas. This data layer, generated by the MN DNR, represents areas with varying levels of
native biodiversity that may contain high quality native plant communities, rare plants, rare
animals, and/or animal aggregations. A biodiversity signifi cance rank is assigned on the
basis of the number of rare species, the quality of the native plant communities, size of the
site, and the site’s context within the landscape. The classifi cations displayed on the map are
described below:
• Below sites lacking occurrences of rare species and/or natural features that meet MCBS
standards for an Outstanding, High, or Moderate rank
• Moderate sites containing signifi cant occurrences of rare species, and/or moderately
disturbed native plant communities and landscapes that have a strong potential for
recovery
• High sites containing very good quality occurrences of the rarest species, high qual-
ity examples of the rarest native plant communities, and/or important functional
landscapes
• Outstanding sites containing the best occurrences of the rarest species, the most out-
standing examples of the rarest native plant communities, and/or the largest, most intact
functional landscapes present in the state
Table E6 - Sites of Biodiversity Signifi cance, summarizes the acreage of the four categories of
sites of biodiversity signifi cance found within the City of Scandia.
Table E6 - Sites of Biodiversity Signifi cance
Natural Area Type Size (acres)
Below 309
Moderate 933
High 332
Outstanding 343
TOTAL 1,917
Source: Minnesota County Biological Survey
217Scandia Comprehensive Plan16 17
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th St N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St NPilar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
Ostrum Tr
188th St NPomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
a
ris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr
NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
177th St NOld Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
010.5
Miles
Natural AreasNatural Areas
Forest
Woodland
Shrubland
Grassland
Sparse Vegetation
Forested Wetland
Shrub Wetland
Herbaceous Wetland
Sparse Wetland Vegetation
Open Water
City Boundary
Section Lines
Streams
Data Sources: MN DNR;
Metropolitan Council
May 18, 2008
Map E7 - Natural Areas
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Quality of Natural Areas
There are two different measures of high quality natural areas:
• Natural area quality grades included in the MLCCS
• Minnesota County Biological Survey (MCBS) Sites of Biodiversity Signifi cance
Natural area quality grades using an A through F grading system are collected as part of the
MLCCS. Natural areas given a grade of A, AB, B, or BC are considered high quality and are
displayed on Map E8 - High Quality Natural Areas. There are approximately 1,270 acres of
high quality areas within the City of Scandia using this measure.
MCBS Sites of Biodiversity Signifi cance are also displayed on Map E8 - High Quality Natural
Areas. This data layer, generated by the MN DNR, represents areas with varying levels of
native biodiversity that may contain high quality native plant communities, rare plants, rare
animals, and/or animal aggregations. A biodiversity signifi cance rank is assigned on the
basis of the number of rare species, the quality of the native plant communities, size of the
site, and the site’s context within the landscape. The classifi cations displayed on the map are
described below:
• Below sites lacking occurrences of rare species and/or natural features that meet MCBS
standards for an Outstanding, High, or Moderate rank
• Moderate sites containing signifi cant occurrences of rare species, and/or moderately
disturbed native plant communities and landscapes that have a strong potential for
recovery
• High sites containing very good quality occurrences of the rarest species, high qual-
ity examples of the rarest native plant communities, and/or important functional
landscapes
• Outstanding sites containing the best occurrences of the rarest species, the most out-
standing examples of the rarest native plant communities, and/or the largest, most intact
functional landscapes present in the state
Table E6 - Sites of Biodiversity Signifi cance, summarizes the acreage of the four categories of
sites of biodiversity signifi cance found within the City of Scandia.
Table E6 - Sites of Biodiversity Signifi cance
Natural Area Type Size (acres)
Below 309
Moderate 933
High 332
Outstanding 343
TOTAL 1,917
Source: Minnesota County Biological Survey
218 Scandia Comprehensive Plan18 19
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSai
n
t Cr
o
i
x
Tr
NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
High Quality Natural AreasHigh Quality Natural Areas
High Quality Natural Areas
Sites of Biodiversity Significance
Outstanding
High
Moderate
Below
City Boundary
Section Lines
Open Water
Streams
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
Data Sources: MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council
May 18, 2008
Map E8 - High Quality Natural Areas
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Map E9 - Regionally Signifi cant Ecological Areas
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Regionally Significant Ecological AreasRegionally Significant Ecological Areas
Regionally Significant Ecological Areas
Outstanding Ecological Score
High Ecological Score
Moderate Ecological Score
City Boundary
Section Lines
Open Water
Streams
Roads
State Hwy
County Hwy
City Road
Other Road
Data Sources: MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council
May 18, 2008
219Scandia Comprehensive Plan18 19
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th St N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St NPilar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
Ostrum Tr
188th St NPomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSai
n
t Cr
o
i
x
Tr
NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
177th St NOld Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
010.5
Miles
High Quality Natural AreasHigh Quality Natural Areas
High Quality Natural Areas
Sites of Biodiversity Significance
Outstanding
High
Moderate
Below
City Boundary
Section Lines
Open Water
Streams
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
Data Sources: MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council
May 18, 2008
Map E8 - High Quality Natural Areas
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Map E9 - Regionally Signifi cant Ecological Areas
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Regionally Significant Ecological AreasRegionally Significant Ecological Areas
Regionally Significant Ecological Areas
Outstanding Ecological Score
High Ecological Score
Moderate Ecological Score
City Boundary
Section Lines
Open Water
Streams
Roads
State Hwy
County Hwy
City Road
Other Road
Data Sources: MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council
May 18, 2008
220 Scandia Comprehensive Plan20 21
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
National Wetland Inventory
The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) is a national program sponsored by the US Fish
and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Based on the NWI data, the City of Scandia has approxi-
mately 5,492 acres of wetland. Map E10 - National Wetlands Inventory, displays wetland area
features mapped as part of the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI).
Wetland Assessment Status
The Carnelian Marine St. Croix Watershed District (CMSCWD) has completed a wetland
assessment for a portion of the watershed. The wetland assessment contains more com-
plete and more acccurate data than the NWI. A wetland assessment categorizes wetlands by
importance, quality, and need for restoration. The CMSCWD plans to complete the wetland
assessment for the remainder of the watershed in 2008. The Comfort Lake-Forest Lake
Watershed District and the Rice Creek Watershed District have not completed wetland as-
sessments. Map E11 - Wetland Assessments, displays the Wetland Assessments that have been
completed within the City of Scandia.
Table E7 - Regionally Signifi cant Ecological Areas
Natural Area Type Size (acres)
Moderate 1,490
High 1,328
Outstanding 1,890
TOTAL 4,708
Source: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Manning Tr NMel
ani
e Tr
NOxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSa
i
nt Cr
o
i
x
Tr
NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
National Wetlands InventoryNational Wetlands Inventory
National Wetlands Inventory
Lakes and Rivers
Wetlands
City Boundary
Section Lines
Streams
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
Data Sources: MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council
May 18, 2008
Map E10 - National Wetlands InventoryRegionally Signifi cant Natural Areas
The MN DNR completed an analysis of regionally signifi cant Terrestrial and Wetland Eco-
logical Areas in the seven county metropolitan area in 2004. The analysis assessed remaining
forest, grassland, and wetland areas. The scores were determined by examining important
ecological attributes of the natural areas, including size, shape, cover type diversity, and ad-
jacent land use. Map E9 - Regionally Signifi cant Ecological Areas, displays Regionally Signifi cant
Ecological Areas, as determined by the MN DNR. Table E6 - Regionally Signifi cant Ecological
Areas, summarizes the acreage for each category of Regionally Signifi cant Ecological Areas
found within the City of Scandia.
221Scandia Comprehensive Plan20 21
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
National Wetland Inventory
The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) is a national program sponsored by the US Fish
and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Based on the NWI data, the City of Scandia has approxi-
mately 5,492 acres of wetland. Map E10 - National Wetlands Inventory, displays wetland area
features mapped as part of the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI).
Wetland Assessment Status
The Carnelian Marine St. Croix Watershed District (CMSCWD) has completed a wetland
assessment for a portion of the watershed. The wetland assessment contains more com-
plete and more acccurate data than the NWI. A wetland assessment categorizes wetlands by
importance, quality, and need for restoration. The CMSCWD plans to complete the wetland
assessment for the remainder of the watershed in 2008. The Comfort Lake-Forest Lake
Watershed District and the Rice Creek Watershed District have not completed wetland as-
sessments. Map E11 - Wetland Assessments, displays the Wetland Assessments that have been
completed within the City of Scandia.
Table E7 - Regionally Signifi cant Ecological Areas
Natural Area TypeSize (acres)
Moderate1,490
High1,328
Outstanding1,890
TOTAL4,708
Source: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNolan Ave NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Manning Tr NMel
ani
e Tr
NOxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSa
i
nt Cr
o
i
x
Tr
NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
National Wetlands InventoryNational Wetlands Inventory
National Wetlands Inventory
Lakes and Rivers
Wetlands
City Boundary
Section Lines
Streams
Roads
State Highway
County Highway
City Road
Other Road
Data Sources: MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council
May 18, 2008
Map E10 - National Wetlands InventoryRegionally Signifi cant Natural Areas
The MN DNR completed an analysis of regionally signifi cant Terrestrial and Wetland Eco-
logical Areas in the seven county metropolitan area in 2004. The analysis assessed remaining
forest, grassland, and wetland areas. The scores were determined by examining important
ecological attributes of the natural areas, including size, shape, cover type diversity, and ad-
jacent land use. Map E9 - Regionally Signifi cant Ecological Areas, displays Regionally Signifi cant
Ecological Areas, as determined by the MN DNR. Table E6 - Regionally Signifi cant Ecological
Areas, summarizes the acreage for each category of Regionally Signifi cant Ecological Areas
found within the City of Scandia.
222 Scandia Comprehensive Plan22 23
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
CMSCWD
CLFLWD
RCWD
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th S t N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNo
l
a
n
A
v
e
NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St N Pil
ar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
O s t r u m T r
188th St N Pomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
1 7 7 t h S t N Old Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
0 10.5
Miles
Wetland AssessmentsWetland Assessments
CMSCWD Wetland Management Class
1 - High Quality/Highest Priority
2 - Stream Corridor + Shoreland Wetlands
3 - Isolated Wetlands
4 - Utilitzed Wetlands
City Boundary
Section Lines
Streams
Watershed Boundaries
Data Sources: MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council,
CMSCWD
May 18, 2008
Map E11 - Wetland Assessments
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Existing Water Resource Planning Framework
The purpose of this section is to:
• Describe the purpose of surface water and groundwater planning
• Identify the agencies and organizations that do surface water and groundwater planning
within the City of Scandia, and
• Summarize the goals and policies of recent plans and studies regarding surface water
and groundwater resources in the City of Scandia.
The purpose of water planning is to protect and maintain or improve the quality of surface
water and groundwater resources. It should be noted that there is a great deal of overlap
in planning for surface water resources and planning for groundwater resources. While the
planning efforts for each are described here separately, in reality, surface water planning ef-
forts usually touch on groundwater issues and groundwater planning efforts often include
issues relating to the interaction between surface water and groundwater.
Within the City of Scandia, surface water planning is done by several entities. Minnesota
Statute 103D enables the creation of watershed districts. Watershed districts are local units
of government that protect surface water resources through the adoption and implementa-
tion of local water management plans. Because watersheds do not follow political boundar-
ies, there are three watershed districts within the City of Scandia: the Carnelian Marine-St.
Croix Watershed District (CMSCWD), the Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District
(CLFLWD), and the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). Map E3 - Watershed Bound-
ariesand Watershed District Boundaries, shows the boundaries of each watershed district within
the City of Scandia (page 16). Every 10 years, each watershed district is required to prepare
plans to:
• Protect, preserve, and use natural surface and groundwater storage and retention
systems
• Minimize public capital expenditures needed to correct fl ooding and water quality
problems
• Identify and plan for means to effectively protect and improve surface and groundwater
quality
• Establish more uniform local policies and offi cial controls for surface and groundwater
management
• Prevent erosion of soil into surface water systems
• Promote groundwater recharge
• Protect and enhance fi sh and wildlife habitat and water recreational facilities; and
• Secure the other benefi ts associated with the proper management of surface and
groundwater.
After plan approval by the Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), the watershed
district formally adopts the plan and requires each city or township within its boundaries to
create and implement their own local water management plan consistent with the watershed
district’s plan. As a result, the City of Scandia is required to develop its own local water
management plan that is consistent with approved watershed district plans. The CMSCWD
adopted their most recent plan in 2000, the CLFLWD adopted their most recent plan in
2001 with revisions adopted and approved by BWSR in August 2008. After developing a
local water management plan, a city or township may then also develop or update local ordi-
nances in order to implement or enforce portions of their plan.
223Scandia Comprehensive Plan22 23
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
?øA@
?öA@
?öA@
G`WX
GbWX
GbWX
S°
GoWX
S«
CHISAGO COUNTY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WISCONSINMINNESOTASt Croix RiverSø³A
CMSCWD
CLFLWD
RCWD
Big Marine Lake
Bone Lake
Goose Lake
Sea Lake
Fish Lake
White Rock Lake
Hay Lake
Sylvan Lake
Clear Lake
Nielsen Lake
Long Lake
Elwell Lake
Scandia Tr N
228th St N
O
a
k
hill
R
d
N
205th St N
240th St N
Lof
t
on Ave N185th St NMayberry Tr NNo
l
a
n
A
v
e
NSaint Croix Tr N230th St N
Olinda Tr N177th St NPilar
Rd N218th St N
Oren Ave N
Oxboro Ave NMaxwill Ave NLakamaga Tr N
Ostrum Tr
188th St NPomroy Ave NQuinnell Ave NP
aris
h
R
d
N
Quant Ave NOld Marine Tr N
Keystone Ave NMargo Ave NQuality Tr NMeadowbrook Ave NSaint Croix Tr NOakhill Rd NSaint Cr
oi
x
Tr NOlinda Tr NM
ayberry Tr N
177th St NOld Marine Tr NCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive PlanCity of Scandia 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan
/
010.5
Miles
Wetland AssessmentsWetland Assessments
CMSCWD Wetland Management Class
1 - High Quality/Highest Priority
2 - Stream Corridor + Shoreland Wetlands
3 - Isolated Wetlands
4 - Utilitzed Wetlands
City Boundary
Section Lines
Streams
Watershed Boundaries
Data Sources: MN DNR,
Metropolitan Council,
CMSCWD
May 18, 2008
Map E11 - Wetland Assessments
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Existing Water Resource Planning Framework
The purpose of this section is to:
• Describe the purpose of surface water and groundwater planning
• Identify the agencies and organizations that do surface water and groundwater planning
within the City of Scandia, and
• Summarize the goals and policies of recent plans and studies regarding surface water
and groundwater resources in the City of Scandia.
The purpose of water planning is to protect and maintain or improve the quality of surface
water and groundwater resources. It should be noted that there is a great deal of overlap
in planning for surface water resources and planning for groundwater resources. While the
planning efforts for each are described here separately, in reality, surface water planning ef-
forts usually touch on groundwater issues and groundwater planning efforts often include
issues relating to the interaction between surface water and groundwater.
Within the City of Scandia, surface water planning is done by several entities. Minnesota
Statute 103D enables the creation of watershed districts. Watershed districts are local units
of government that protect surface water resources through the adoption and implementa-
tion of local water management plans. Because watersheds do not follow political boundar-
ies, there are three watershed districts within the City of Scandia: the Carnelian Marine-St.
Croix Watershed District (CMSCWD), the Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District
(CLFLWD), and the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). Map E3 - Watershed Bound-
ariesand Watershed District Boundaries, shows the boundaries of each watershed district within
the City of Scandia (page 16). Every 10 years, each watershed district is required to prepare
plans to:
• Protect, preserve, and use natural surface and groundwater storage and retention
systems
• Minimize public capital expenditures needed to correct fl ooding and water quality
problems
• Identify and plan for means to effectively protect and improve surface and groundwater
quality
• Establish more uniform local policies and offi cial controls for surface and groundwater
management
• Prevent erosion of soil into surface water systems
• Promote groundwater recharge
• Protect and enhance fi sh and wildlife habitat and water recreational facilities; and
• Secure the other benefi ts associated with the proper management of surface and
groundwater.
After plan approval by the Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), the watershed
district formally adopts the plan and requires each city or township within its boundaries to
create and implement their own local water management plan consistent with the watershed
district’s plan. As a result, the City of Scandia is required to develop its own local water
management plan that is consistent with approved watershed district plans. The CMSCWD
adopted their most recent plan in 2000, the CLFLWD adopted their most recent plan in
2001 with revisions adopted and approved by BWSR in August 2008. After developing a
local water management plan, a city or township may then also develop or update local ordi-
nances in order to implement or enforce portions of their plan.
224 Scandia Comprehensive Plan24 25
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Groundwater planning is also completed by several entities within the City of Scandia. Min-
nesota Statute 103D allows watershed districts to include groundwater resources in their
local water management plans, while Minnesota Statute 103B provides counties with the
authority to complete groundwater plans. County Groundwater Plans are approved by the
Board of Water and Soil Resources; Washington County’s most recent Groundwater Plan
was completed and approved in 2003. Washington County’s 2003 Plan focuses on protecting
groundwater resources through coordinated intergovernmental efforts. Priority groundwa-
ter issues for the County for cities like Scandia include proper Individual Sewage Treatment
System installation and maintenance and proper installation, maintenance, and sealing of
residential wells.
The plans, studies, and ordinances summarized in this report include:
• Carnelian Marine-St. Croix Watershed District, Watershed Management Plan, 2000
• Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District, Watershed Management Plan, 2001,
revised 2008
• Rice Creek Watershed District, Watershed Management Plan, 1997 (amended 2000)
• City of Scandia, DRAFT Shoreland Management Regulations, 2007
• Washington County Groundwater Plan, 2003-2013
• Washington County Model Groundwater Rules, 2004
• Integrating Groundwater and Surface Water Management – Northern Washington
County, 2003
This section briefl y describes the most recent local water management plan for each of the
three watershed districts within the City of Scandia, followed by a comparison of the goals,
objectives, and policies of each plan. The City of Scandia’s draft Shoreland Management
Regulations are also summarized.
City of Scandia, Shoreland Management Regulations, 2007
When a new city is incorporated, it is required to adopt its own ordinances for which is had
previously relied on the County. To that end, the City of Scandia adopted a new Shoreland
Management Ordinance, as chapter 5 of the City of Scandia’s Development Code. The
purpose and intent of the shoreland management regulations is to:
• Designate suitable land use districts for each body of public water
• Regulate the placement of sanitary and waste treatment facilities on lots
• Regulate the area of a lot and the length of water frontage suitable for building sites
• Regulate the alteration of shorelands of public waters
• Regulate alterations of the natural vegetation and the natural topography along
shorelands
• Conserve natural resources and maintain a high standard of environmental quality
• Preserve and enhance the quality of surface water
• Preserve the economic and natural environmental values of shorelands
• Provide for the utilization of water and related land resources
• Maintain water quality, reduce fl ooding and erosion, and to provide food and habitat for
wildlife.
Surface Water Planning
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Carnelian Marine-St. Croix Watershed District, Watershed Management Plan,
2000
The Carnelian Marine-St. Croix Watershed District’s (CMSCWD) most recent watershed
management plan was created in 2000. The plan contains the goals, policies and manage-
ment plans of the CMSCWD and guides the watershed’s activities until 2010. 78% of the
city of Scandia falls within the CMSCWD. Electronic copies of the plan are available upon
request. Please contact John Bower, CMSCWD President:
Email: CarMarWD@aol.com
Phone: (651) 430-2793
The 2000 CMSCWD Watershed Management Plan contains objectives and policies for 12
major issue areas:
• Water Quality
• Lake Management
• Groundwater
• Wetlands
• Streams
• Erosion & Sedimentation Control
• Stormwater Runoff
• Flooding
• Shoreland Management
• Fish & Wildlife
• Parks, Natural Corridors & Open Space
• Aquatic Vegetation Management
Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District, Watershed Management Plan,
2001
The Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District’s (CLFLWD) most recent watershed
management plan was created in 2001 with revisions adopted and approved by BWSR in
August 2008. The plan contains the goals, objectives, and actions of the CLFLWD and
guides the watershed’s activities until 2011. An electronic version of the plan can be found
at: http://www.clfl wd.org/docs/watershed_management_plan.pdf
The plan has 7 core goal areas:
• Water Management
• Lakes
• Streams
• Wetlands
• Natural Resources
• Biotic Diversity, and
• Interagency and Public Coordination
Because the city is currently updating its comprehensive plan and two of the watershed dis-
tricts within the city are updating their rules, this draft ordinance is considered an “interim”
measure. After the comprehensive plan is adopted, the city is expected to complete and
overall update to its Development Code.
CLFLWD is in the fi nal stages of drafting rules and standards to support a permitting
program for the following activities: stormwater management; erosion control; shoreline and
streambank alterations; watercourse and basin crossings; fl oodplain and drainage alterations;
and wetland management under the state Wetland Control Act. After adoption of the rules
and standards by CLFLWD, Scandia will be required to update its ordinances to come into
consistency with the new rules and standards. In addition, CLFLWD is in the fi nal stages of
developing a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)plan for Bone lake because it is listed by
225Scandia Comprehensive Plan24 25
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Groundwater planning is also completed by several entities within the City of Scandia. Min-
nesota Statute 103D allows watershed districts to include groundwater resources in their
local water management plans, while Minnesota Statute 103B provides counties with the
authority to complete groundwater plans. County Groundwater Plans are approved by the
Board of Water and Soil Resources; Washington County’s most recent Groundwater Plan
was completed and approved in 2003. Washington County’s 2003 Plan focuses on protecting
groundwater resources through coordinated intergovernmental efforts. Priority groundwa-
ter issues for the County for cities like Scandia include proper Individual Sewage Treatment
System installation and maintenance and proper installation, maintenance, and sealing of
residential wells.
The plans, studies, and ordinances summarized in this report include:
• Carnelian Marine-St. Croix Watershed District, Watershed Management Plan, 2000
• Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District, Watershed Management Plan, 2001,
revised 2008
• Rice Creek Watershed District, Watershed Management Plan, 1997 (amended 2000)
• City of Scandia, DRAFT Shoreland Management Regulations, 2007
• Washington County Groundwater Plan, 2003-2013
• Washington County Model Groundwater Rules, 2004
• Integrating Groundwater and Surface Water Management – Northern Washington
County, 2003
This section briefl y describes the most recent local water management plan for each of the
three watershed districts within the City of Scandia, followed by a comparison of the goals,
objectives, and policies of each plan. The City of Scandia’s draft Shoreland Management
Regulations are also summarized.
City of Scandia, Shoreland Management Regulations, 2007
When a new city is incorporated, it is required to adopt its own ordinances for which is had
previously relied on the County. To that end, the City of Scandia adopted a new Shoreland
Management Ordinance, as chapter 5 of the City of Scandia’s Development Code. The
purpose and intent of the shoreland management regulations is to:
• Designate suitable land use districts for each body of public water
• Regulate the placement of sanitary and waste treatment facilities on lots
• Regulate the area of a lot and the length of water frontage suitable for building sites
• Regulate the alteration of shorelands of public waters
• Regulate alterations of the natural vegetation and the natural topography along
shorelands
• Conserve natural resources and maintain a high standard of environmental quality
• Preserve and enhance the quality of surface water
• Preserve the economic and natural environmental values of shorelands
• Provide for the utilization of water and related land resources
• Maintain water quality, reduce fl ooding and erosion, and to provide food and habitat for
wildlife.
Surface Water Planning
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Carnelian Marine-St. Croix Watershed District, Watershed Management Plan,
2000
The Carnelian Marine-St. Croix Watershed District’s (CMSCWD) most recent watershed
management plan was created in 2000. The plan contains the goals, policies and manage-
ment plans of the CMSCWD and guides the watershed’s activities until 2010. 78% of the
city of Scandia falls within the CMSCWD. Electronic copies of the plan are available upon
request. Please contact John Bower, CMSCWD President:
Email: CarMarWD@aol.com
Phone: (651) 430-2793
The 2000 CMSCWD Watershed Management Plan contains objectives and policies for 12
major issue areas:
• Water Quality
• Lake Management
• Groundwater
• Wetlands
• Streams
• Erosion & Sedimentation Control
• Stormwater Runoff
• Flooding
• Shoreland Management
• Fish & Wildlife
• Parks, Natural Corridors & Open Space
• Aquatic Vegetation Management
Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District, Watershed Management Plan,
2001
The Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District’s (CLFLWD) most recent watershed
management plan was created in 2001 with revisions adopted and approved by BWSR in
August 2008. The plan contains the goals, objectives, and actions of the CLFLWD and
guides the watershed’s activities until 2011. An electronic version of the plan can be found
at: http://www.clfl wd.org/docs/watershed_management_plan.pdf
The plan has 7 core goal areas:
• Water Management
• Lakes
• Streams
• Wetlands
• Natural Resources
• Biotic Diversity, and
• Interagency and Public Coordination
Because the city is currently updating its comprehensive plan and two of the watershed dis-
tricts within the city are updating their rules, this draft ordinance is considered an “interim”
measure. After the comprehensive plan is adopted, the city is expected to complete and
overall update to its Development Code.
CLFLWD is in the fi nal stages of drafting rules and standards to support a permitting
program for the following activities: stormwater management; erosion control; shoreline and
streambank alterations; watercourse and basin crossings; fl oodplain and drainage alterations;
and wetland management under the state Wetland Control Act. After adoption of the rules
and standards by CLFLWD, Scandia will be required to update its ordinances to come into
consistency with the new rules and standards. In addition, CLFLWD is in the fi nal stages of
developing a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)plan for Bone lake because it is listed by
226 Scandia Comprehensive Plan26 27
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Rice Creek Watershed District, Watershed Management Plan, 1997 (amended
2000)
The Rice Creek Watershed District’s (RCWD) most recent watershed management plan was
created in 2001. The plan contains the objectives, policies, and management strategies of
the RCWD and guides the watershed’s activities until 2007. 0.2% of the city of Scandia falls
within the RCWD. An electronic version of the plan can be found at:
http://www.ricecreek.org/content/documents/planning/Watershed_Management_Plan.pdf
The RCWD’s 1997 Watershed Management Plan has 6 objectives:
• Minimize public expenditure to control runoff
• Improve water quality
• Prevent fl ooding and erosion
• Promote groundwater recharge
• Protect and enhance fi sh and wildlife habitat and recreation
• Provide for the transition of water management to local units
Comparison of Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policies
Table E8 - Comparison of relevant surface water goals, objectives, and policies, summarizes the goals,
objectives, and policies included in the CMSCWD, CLFLWD, and RCWD local water man-
agement plans. Only those items that have some bearing activities relating to land use were
included in the table.
Table E8 - Comparison of relevant surface water goals, objectives, and policies from
CMSCWD, CLFLWD, and RCWD local water management plans.
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Table E8 - Comparison of relevant surface water goals, objectives, and policies from
CMSCWD, CLFLWD, and RCWD local water management plans.
the MPCA as impaired for excessive nutrients (phosphorus). Scandia has been participating
in the advisory committee to the TMDL process and will be required to implement load al-
locations resulting from the TMDL.
GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & POLICIES CMSCWD CLFLWD RCWD
General Water Quality
1. District shall exercise review and permitting authority over
all construction activities
2. District will develop rules and implement permit program
3. District shall require local government units to adopt ordi-
nances controlling the access of livestock to public waters
and ditches
4. District will promote the use of BMPs to improve the
quality of water resources
5. District will require that all local water management plans
adopt the water quality goals and design standards in the
plan
6. District will require local units of government to adopt
ordinance that control nuisance waste and debris
7. District will use performance based permit requirements
to restrict nutrient discharges
8. District will promote sustainable development
GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & POLICIES CMSCWD CLFLWD RCWD
9. District will require that new developments implement one
of three water quality BMPs
10. District requires notifi cation of development activities
where hazardous waste is stored or handled
Lake Water Quality
1. District will require that its stormwater discharge nutrient
concentrations be met by new developments
Stream Water Quality
1. District will require 100-foot buffer of native vegetation
surrounding streams on new developments
2. District will require cities to establish a minimum 100-foot
buffer along streams to be acquired as part of land dedica-
tion upon development
3. District will encourage the maintenance of riparian buffers
along waterways
Stormwater Runoff
1. District will require natural infi ltration of runoff, where
practical
2. District will require that peak stormwater discharge from a
development shall not exceed the undeveloped, pre-settle-
ment discharge volume and rate
3. District shall establish impervious surface limits on new
development
4. District will establish standards for stormwater runoff
quality and quantity for new developments
5. District will require that runoff rates from development
sites be controlled in conformance with district require-
ments
Flooding
1. District will require LGUs to adopt fl oodplain ordinances
that meet state requirements
Groundwater
1. District will exercise review and permitting authority over
all developments within 1,000 feet of an identifi ed ground-
water recharge area
2. District will require all developments which result in ½
acre of impervious surfaces to implement groundwater
recharge and infi ltration BMPs
3. District will require LGUs to include land use develop-
ment guidelines for natural groundwater recharge through
infi ltration of rainfall and for protection of groundwater
quality through the control of land use and development
227Scandia Comprehensive Plan26 27
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Rice Creek Watershed District, Watershed Management Plan, 1997 (amended
2000)
The Rice Creek Watershed District’s (RCWD) most recent watershed management plan was
created in 2001. The plan contains the objectives, policies, and management strategies of
the RCWD and guides the watershed’s activities until 2007. 0.2% of the city of Scandia falls
within the RCWD. An electronic version of the plan can be found at:
http://www.ricecreek.org/content/documents/planning/Watershed_Management_Plan.pdf
The RCWD’s 1997 Watershed Management Plan has 6 objectives:
• Minimize public expenditure to control runoff
• Improve water quality
• Prevent fl ooding and erosion
• Promote groundwater recharge
• Protect and enhance fi sh and wildlife habitat and recreation
• Provide for the transition of water management to local units
Comparison of Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policies
Table E8 - Comparison of relevant surface water goals, objectives, and policies, summarizes the goals,
objectives, and policies included in the CMSCWD, CLFLWD, and RCWD local water man-
agement plans. Only those items that have some bearing activities relating to land use were
included in the table.
Table E8 - Comparison of relevant surface water goals, objectives, and policies from
CMSCWD, CLFLWD, and RCWD local water management plans.
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Table E8 - Comparison of relevant surface water goals, objectives, and policies from
CMSCWD, CLFLWD, and RCWD local water management plans.
the MPCA as impaired for excessive nutrients (phosphorus). Scandia has been participating
in the advisory committee to the TMDL process and will be required to implement load al-
locations resulting from the TMDL.
GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & POLICIESCMSCWDCLFLWDRCWD
General Water Quality
1. District shall exercise review and permitting authority over
all construction activities
2. District will develop rules and implement permit program
3. District shall require local government units to adopt ordi-
nances controlling the access of livestock to public waters
and ditches
4. District will promote the use of BMPs to improve the
quality of water resources
5. District will require that all local water management plans
adopt the water quality goals and design standards in the
plan
6. District will require local units of government to adopt
ordinance that control nuisance waste and debris
7. District will use performance based permit requirements
to restrict nutrient discharges
8. District will promote sustainable development
GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & POLICIES CMSCWD CLFLWD RCWD
9. District will require that new developments implement one
of three water quality BMPs
10. District requires notifi cation of development activities
where hazardous waste is stored or handled
Lake Water Quality
1. District will require that its stormwater discharge nutrient
concentrations be met by new developments
Stream Water Quality
1. District will require 100-foot buffer of native vegetation
surrounding streams on new developments
2. District will require cities to establish a minimum 100-foot
buffer along streams to be acquired as part of land dedica-
tion upon development
3. District will encourage the maintenance of riparian buffers
along waterways
Stormwater Runoff
1. District will require natural infi ltration of runoff, where
practical
2. District will require that peak stormwater discharge from a
development shall not exceed the undeveloped, pre-settle-
ment discharge volume and rate
3. District shall establish impervious surface limits on new
development
4. District will establish standards for stormwater runoff
quality and quantity for new developments
5. District will require that runoff rates from development
sites be controlled in conformance with district require-
ments
Flooding
1. District will require LGUs to adopt fl oodplain ordinances
that meet state requirements
Groundwater
1. District will exercise review and permitting authority over
all developments within 1,000 feet of an identifi ed ground-
water recharge area
2. District will require all developments which result in ½
acre of impervious surfaces to implement groundwater
recharge and infi ltration BMPs
3. District will require LGUs to include land use develop-
ment guidelines for natural groundwater recharge through
infi ltration of rainfall and for protection of groundwater
quality through the control of land use and development
228 Scandia Comprehensive Plan28 29
GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & POLICIES CMSCWD CLFLWD RCWD
4. District will work with LGUs to modify land use and
zoning plans to protect groundwater and groundwater
recharge areas
5. District will not allow mining within 3 feet of the highest
indicated groundwater table
6. District will prohibit the construction of impervious
surfaces within fl oodplain recharge areas except for road
constructions
7. Control developments with the potential to contaminate
development
8. Preserve groundwater recharge areas
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Table E8 - Comparison of relevant surface water goals, objectives, and policies from
CMSCWD, CLFLWD, and RCWD local water management plans.
This section of the background report briefl y describes the most recent plans and studies
relating to groundwater planning in the City of Scandia, followed by a comparison of the
goals and objectives of each plan or study.
Washington County Groundwater Plan, 2003-2013
The Washington County Groundwater Plan provides a county-wide framework for the pro-
tection and conservation of groundwater resources. The current plan was approved in 2003
and guides the protection of groundwater resources in the county until 2013. An electronic
version of the plan can be found at: http://www.co.washington.mn.us/client_fi les/docu-
ments/phe/ENV//ENV-2003GroundwaterPlan.pdf
The overall goal of the Washington County Groundwater Plan is to protect the economic
and environmental values groundwater provides through coordinated, intergovernmental
efforts in research and assessment, policies, political infl uence, regulation, education, and
consultation and technical assistance.
The plan addresses two major issues: groundwater quality and groundwater quantity. The
plan identifi es 7 major issue areas relating to groundwater quality and groundwater quantity:
• Non-agricultural land use
• Agriculture, turf, and animal waste management
• Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS)
• Wellhead protection and well management
• Groundwater supply
• Groundwater and surface water interaction
• Hazardous materials management and transportation
Groundwater Planning
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Washington County Model Groundwater Rules, 2004
In 2004, the Washington County Water Consortium developed model groundwater rules for
future adoption by the water management organizations (WMOs) located within the County.
The model rules address groundwater appropriations, stormwater runoff volume control,
groundwater quality, the protection of groundwater dependent natural resources.
The purpose of the model rules is to encourage water management organizations to adopt
groundwater standards. As local units of government develop local water management
plans they will also have to consider the adoption of similar standards in order to be consis-
tent with the watershed management plan as they. The overall goal is for groundwater pro-
tection to become an integral part of future land use decisions at both the watershed district
level as well as the municipal level.
An electronic version of the model rules can be found at: http://www.co.washington.
mn.us/client_fi les/documents/phe/ENV//ENV-WDReport.pdf
Integrating Groundwater and Surface Water Management, Northern
Washington County, 2003
The purpose of this study by Washington County is to provide local decision makers with
planning level information on groundwater resources. It provides data to support manage-
ment strategies and policies protecting lakes, wetlands, streams, and water supplies depen-
dent on groundwater resources. The study area for this report includes all areas of Washing-
ton County north of State Highway 36. The study included:
• An educational component aimed at educating and informing local water management
groups
• A hydrologic monitoring plan
• An assessment of groundwater resources - lakes, recharge and discharge areas, and
groundwater dependent resources were inventoried and classifi ed
• A strategy for integrating groundwater and surface water management, including policies
and recommendations for drinking water protection, maintaining recharge, and manag-
ing high water levels
• A feasibility study for managing excess surface water - Valley Branch Watershed District
investigated alternatives for retention and infi ltration of water in the upper watershed of
the Sunnybrook Lake area.
An electronic version of the study can be found at: http://www.co.washington.mn.us/cli-
ent_fi les/documents/phe/ENV//ENV-GroundSurfaceWaterMgmt.pdf
The strategy for integrating groundwater and surface water management addresses four is-
sues relating to groundwater:
• Groundwater recharge and discharge areas
• Areas susceptible to high water levels
• Groundwater-surface water interaction and groundwater dependent resources
• Education
229Scandia Comprehensive Plan28 29
GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & POLICIESCMSCWDCLFLWDRCWD
4. District will work with LGUs to modify land use and
zoning plans to protect groundwater and groundwater
recharge areas
5. District will not allow mining within 3 feet of the highest
indicated groundwater table
6. District will prohibit the construction of impervious
surfaces within fl oodplain recharge areas except for road
constructions
7. Control developments with the potential to contaminate
development
8. Preserve groundwater recharge areas
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Table E8 - Comparison of relevant surface water goals, objectives, and policies from
CMSCWD, CLFLWD, and RCWD local water management plans.
This section of the background report briefl y describes the most recent plans and studies
relating to groundwater planning in the City of Scandia, followed by a comparison of the
goals and objectives of each plan or study.
Washington County Groundwater Plan, 2003-2013
The Washington County Groundwater Plan provides a county-wide framework for the pro-
tection and conservation of groundwater resources. The current plan was approved in 2003
and guides the protection of groundwater resources in the county until 2013. An electronic
version of the plan can be found at: http://www.co.washington.mn.us/client_fi les/docu-
ments/phe/ENV//ENV-2003GroundwaterPlan.pdf
The overall goal of the Washington County Groundwater Plan is to protect the economic
and environmental values groundwater provides through coordinated, intergovernmental
efforts in research and assessment, policies, political infl uence, regulation, education, and
consultation and technical assistance.
The plan addresses two major issues: groundwater quality and groundwater quantity. The
plan identifi es 7 major issue areas relating to groundwater quality and groundwater quantity:
• Non-agricultural land use
• Agriculture, turf, and animal waste management
• Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS)
• Wellhead protection and well management
• Groundwater supply
• Groundwater and surface water interaction
• Hazardous materials management and transportation
Groundwater Planning
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Washington County Model Groundwater Rules, 2004
In 2004, the Washington County Water Consortium developed model groundwater rules for
future adoption by the water management organizations (WMOs) located within the County.
The model rules address groundwater appropriations, stormwater runoff volume control,
groundwater quality, the protection of groundwater dependent natural resources.
The purpose of the model rules is to encourage water management organizations to adopt
groundwater standards. As local units of government develop local water management
plans they will also have to consider the adoption of similar standards in order to be consis-
tent with the watershed management plan as they. The overall goal is for groundwater pro-
tection to become an integral part of future land use decisions at both the watershed district
level as well as the municipal level.
An electronic version of the model rules can be found at: http://www.co.washington.
mn.us/client_fi les/documents/phe/ENV//ENV-WDReport.pdf
Integrating Groundwater and Surface Water Management, Northern
Washington County, 2003
The purpose of this study by Washington County is to provide local decision makers with
planning level information on groundwater resources. It provides data to support manage-
ment strategies and policies protecting lakes, wetlands, streams, and water supplies depen-
dent on groundwater resources. The study area for this report includes all areas of Washing-
ton County north of State Highway 36. The study included:
• An educational component aimed at educating and informing local water management
groups
• A hydrologic monitoring plan
• An assessment of groundwater resources - lakes, recharge and discharge areas, and
groundwater dependent resources were inventoried and classifi ed
• A strategy for integrating groundwater and surface water management, including policies
and recommendations for drinking water protection, maintaining recharge, and manag-
ing high water levels
• A feasibility study for managing excess surface water - Valley Branch Watershed District
investigated alternatives for retention and infi ltration of water in the upper watershed of
the Sunnybrook Lake area.
An electronic version of the study can be found at: http://www.co.washington.mn.us/cli-
ent_fi les/documents/phe/ENV//ENV-GroundSurfaceWaterMgmt.pdf
The strategy for integrating groundwater and surface water management addresses four is-
sues relating to groundwater:
• Groundwater recharge and discharge areas
• Areas susceptible to high water levels
• Groundwater-surface water interaction and groundwater dependent resources
• Education
230 Scandia Comprehensive Plan30 31
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Table E9 - Comparison of relevant groundwater goals, objectives, and policies, summarizes the goals,
objectives, and policies included in the 2003 Washington County Groundwater Plan, 2003
Groundwater Study and the 2004 Washington County Model Groundwater Rules local water
management plans. Only those items that have some bearing activities relating to land use
were included in the table.
Comparison of Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policies
GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & POLICIES 2003 GMP 2003 GW
STUDY
2004 GW
RULES
Non-Agricultural Land Use
1. Assess the potential impacts to groundwater re-
sources from different land uses
2. Provide cities and townships with types of land uses
that may not be suitable in unsewered areas
3. Establish groundwater protection as a goal when
making land use decisions and as part of the com-
prehensive planning process
4. Enforce groundwater-related provisions in the
County and local mining ordinances
Agriculture, Turf, Animal Waste Management
1. Provide model zoning language and mitigations
strategies for areas shown to be impacted by fertil-
izer, pesticides, or animal waste
Individual Sewage Treatment Systems
1. Reduce groundwater contamination related to on-
site waste water treatment systems
2. Revise County ordinance to require property owners
to have a certifi cate of inspection, to upgrade or
replace non-conforming systems, and identify and
properly close abandoned ISTS before property
transfer
3. Require proper design, building, operation and
maintenance of effective septic systems
Aquifer Protection
1. Require reporting of all abandoned wells to prevent
contamination of groundwater
2. Provide fi nancial incentive for identifying and seal-
ing abandoned wells
3. Maintain existing infi ltration volumes whenever any
construction, reconstruction, building activity or
land alteration occurs
4. Restrict of prohibit land uses that generate, use or
store dangerous pollutants in critical recharge areas
Table E9 - Comparison of relevant groundwater goals, objectives, and policies from
groundwater plans and studies.
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & POLICIES 2003 GMP 2003 GW
STUDY
2004 GW
RULES
Groundwater Surface Water Interaction
1. Develop land use regulations to protect groundwater
resources based on completed studies and rankings
of groundwater recharge areas
2. For all new developments and re-developments,
adopt rules controlling stormwater runoff volume
and establish performance standards
3. Require all new development and re-development to
offset reduced infi ltration that results from increased
imperviousness
Hazardous Materials Management and Transportation
1. Help communities develop groundwater protection
policies related to the siting and permitting of new
commercial and industrial development
2. Assist communities with groundwater monitoring
plan or groundwater protection plan requirements
3. Require a groundwater monitoring plan or a ground-
water protection plan as part of a permit application
for businesses that store, use, or transport hazardous
materials and for properties formerly used as a waste
disposal site or waste transfer facility
Table E9 - Comparison of relevant groundwater goals, objectives, and policies from
groundwater plans and studies.
231Scandia Comprehensive Plan30 31
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Table E9 - Comparison of relevant groundwater goals, objectives, and policies, summarizes the goals,
objectives, and policies included in the 2003 Washington County Groundwater Plan, 2003
Groundwater Study and the 2004 Washington County Model Groundwater Rules local water
management plans. Only those items that have some bearing activities relating to land use
were included in the table.
Comparison of Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policies
GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & POLICIES 2003 GMP2003 GW
STUDY
2004 GW
RULES
Non-Agricultural Land Use
1. Assess the potential impacts to groundwater re-
sources from different land uses
2. Provide cities and townships with types of land uses
that may not be suitable in unsewered areas
3. Establish groundwater protection as a goal when
making land use decisions and as part of the com-
prehensive planning process
4. Enforce groundwater-related provisions in the
County and local mining ordinances
Agriculture, Turf, Animal Waste Management
1. Provide model zoning language and mitigations
strategies for areas shown to be impacted by fertil-
izer, pesticides, or animal waste
Individual Sewage Treatment Systems
1. Reduce groundwater contamination related to on-
site waste water treatment systems
2. Revise County ordinance to require property owners
to have a certifi cate of inspection, to upgrade or
replace non-conforming systems, and identify and
properly close abandoned ISTS before property
transfer
3. Require proper design, building, operation and
maintenance of effective septic systems
Aquifer Protection
1. Require reporting of all abandoned wells to prevent
contamination of groundwater
2. Provide fi nancial incentive for identifying and seal-
ing abandoned wells
3. Maintain existing infi ltration volumes whenever any
construction, reconstruction, building activity or
land alteration occurs
4. Restrict of prohibit land uses that generate, use or
store dangerous pollutants in critical recharge areas
Table E9 - Comparison of relevant groundwater goals, objectives, and policies from
groundwater plans and studies.
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & POLICIES 2003 GMP 2003 GW
STUDY
2004 GW
RULES
Groundwater Surface Water Interaction
1. Develop land use regulations to protect groundwater
resources based on completed studies and rankings
of groundwater recharge areas
2. For all new developments and re-developments,
adopt rules controlling stormwater runoff volume
and establish performance standards
3. Require all new development and re-development to
offset reduced infi ltration that results from increased
imperviousness
Hazardous Materials Management and Transportation
1. Help communities develop groundwater protection
policies related to the siting and permitting of new
commercial and industrial development
2. Assist communities with groundwater monitoring
plan or groundwater protection plan requirements
3. Require a groundwater monitoring plan or a ground-
water protection plan as part of a permit application
for businesses that store, use, or transport hazardous
materials and for properties formerly used as a waste
disposal site or waste transfer facility
Table E9 - Comparison of relevant groundwater goals, objectives, and policies from
groundwater plans and studies.
232 Scandia Comprehensive Plan32 33
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Water Resource Related Agreements
The City of Scandia has not entered into any water related agreements with watershed man-
agement organizations, adjoining communities, or private parties.
The major problems affecting water resources in Scandia are listed below in Table E10 -
Water related issues. Problems were identifi ed by reviewing the watershed management plans
of the three watershed management organizations having jurisdiction within the City. Ad-
ditional input on problems affecting water resources was solicited from City residents during
the public involvement process for the City’s 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan.
Assessment of Issues
Table E10 - Water related issues
Identifi ed Issues CMSCWD1 CLFLWD2 RCWD3 Scandia Residents4
1.Water quality of surface water resources
2.Stream and ditch channel maintenance
3.Developing community educational
programs
4.Impacts of development, new roads,
and storm water on water resources
5.Lack of community partnerships
6.Lack of enforcement of local and State
rules & regulations
7.Need to address impaired waters
8.Impact of development on fl oodplain
determination
9.Impact of development on wetlands
10.Impact of soil erosion on water
resources
11.
Preservation of natural infrastructure
(rivers, lakes, streams, wetlands, natural
drainage pathways)
12.Impact of invasive species on water
resources
13.Water quality of groundwater resources
Notes:
1. Issues with a check mark in this column were identifi ed by the Carnelian Marine St. Croix Watershed
District in its 2000-2010 Watershed Management Plan.
2. Issues with a check mark in this column were identifi ed by the Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed
District in its 2001-2011 Watershed Management Plan.
3. Issues with a check mark in this column were identifi ed by the Rice Creek Watershed District in its
2000-2010 Watershed Management Plan.
4. Issues with a check mark in this column were identifi ed by residents of Scandia who participated in open
houses and focus groups for the 2008-2030 Scandia Comprehensive Plan.
Appendix E
Goal/ Policy/
Implementation Strategy
Issue Reference Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
NR Goal 1
NR Policy 1.1
NR Policy 1.2
NR IS 1.2.1
NR Policy 1.3
NR Policy 1.4
NR Goal 2
NR Policy 2.1
NR IS 2.1.1
NR Policy 2.2
NR IS 2.2.1
NR IS 2.2.2
NR IS 2.2.3
NR IS 2.2.4
NR Policy 2.3
NR IS 2.3.1
NR IS 2.3.2
NR Policy 2.4
NR IS 2.4.1
NR Policy 2.5
NR IS 2.5.1
NR IS 2.5.2
NR IS 2.5.3
NR IS 2.5.4
NR Policy 2.6
NR IS 2.6.1
NR Policy 2.7
NR IS 2.7.1
The identifi ed water related issues are addressed by multiple goals, policies, and strategies
in the following section. Table E11 - LWMP goals, policies, and implementation strategies by issue,
shows which goals, policies, and strategies address which water related issues. These goals,
policies, and strategies form a detailed and comprehensive plan for addressed local surface
water and groundwater issues. An implementation schedule including the LWMP goals,
policies, and strategies is included as Appendix B of the 2008 City of Scandia Comprehen-
sive Plan. The implementation schedule identifi es a time frame for implementation, identi-
fi es parties primarily responsible for implementation, and the type of action necessary for
implementation (change in regulation, establishment of a program, or education). The only
identifi ed issues that is not addressed by City of Scandia goals, policies, or strategies is issue
number 2, stream and ditch channel maintenance. This issue is addressed by watershed
district plans and ditch authorities and is not a City issue so is not addressed in the Scandia
LWMP.
Table E11 - LWMP goals, policies, and implementation strategies by issue
Local Water Management Plan
233Scandia Comprehensive Plan32 33
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Water Resource Related Agreements
The City of Scandia has not entered into any water related agreements with watershed man-
agement organizations, adjoining communities, or private parties.
The major problems affecting water resources in Scandia are listed below in Table E10 -
Water related issues. Problems were identifi ed by reviewing the watershed management plans
of the three watershed management organizations having jurisdiction within the City. Ad-
ditional input on problems affecting water resources was solicited from City residents during
the public involvement process for the City’s 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan.
Assessment of Issues
Table E10 - Water related issues
Identifi ed IssuesCMSCWD1CLFLWD2RCWD3Scandia Residents4
1.Water quality of surface water resources
2.Stream and ditch channel maintenance
3.Developing community educational
programs
4.Impacts of development, new roads,
and storm water on water resources
5.Lack of community partnerships
6.Lack of enforcement of local and State
rules & regulations
7.Need to address impaired waters
8.Impact of development on fl oodplain
determination
9.Impact of development on wetlands
10.Impact of soil erosion on water
resources
11.
Preservation of natural infrastructure
(rivers, lakes, streams, wetlands, natural
drainage pathways)
12.Impact of invasive species on water
resources
13.Water quality of groundwater resources
Notes:
1. Issues with a check mark in this column were identifi ed by the Carnelian Marine St. Croix Watershed
District in its 2000-2010 Watershed Management Plan.
2. Issues with a check mark in this column were identifi ed by the Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed
District in its 2001-2011 Watershed Management Plan.
3. Issues with a check mark in this column were identifi ed by the Rice Creek Watershed District in its
2000-2010 Watershed Management Plan.
4. Issues with a check mark in this column were identifi ed by residents of Scandia who participated in open
houses and focus groups for the 2008-2030 Scandia Comprehensive Plan.
Appendix E
Goal/ Policy/
Implementation Strategy
Issue Reference Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
NR Goal 1
NR Policy 1.1
NR Policy 1.2
NR IS 1.2.1
NR Policy 1.3
NR Policy 1.4
NR Goal 2
NR Policy 2.1
NR IS 2.1.1
NR Policy 2.2
NR IS 2.2.1
NR IS 2.2.2
NR IS 2.2.3
NR IS 2.2.4
NR Policy 2.3
NR IS 2.3.1
NR IS 2.3.2
NR Policy 2.4
NR IS 2.4.1
NR Policy 2.5
NR IS 2.5.1
NR IS 2.5.2
NR IS 2.5.3
NR IS 2.5.4
NR Policy 2.6
NR IS 2.6.1
NR Policy 2.7
NR IS 2.7.1
The identifi ed water related issues are addressed by multiple goals, policies, and strategies
in the following section. Table E11 - LWMP goals, policies, and implementation strategies by issue,
shows which goals, policies, and strategies address which water related issues. These goals,
policies, and strategies form a detailed and comprehensive plan for addressed local surface
water and groundwater issues. An implementation schedule including the LWMP goals,
policies, and strategies is included as Appendix B of the 2008 City of Scandia Comprehen-
sive Plan. The implementation schedule identifi es a time frame for implementation, identi-
fi es parties primarily responsible for implementation, and the type of action necessary for
implementation (change in regulation, establishment of a program, or education). The only
identifi ed issues that is not addressed by City of Scandia goals, policies, or strategies is issue
number 2, stream and ditch channel maintenance. This issue is addressed by watershed
district plans and ditch authorities and is not a City issue so is not addressed in the Scandia
LWMP.
Table E11 - LWMP goals, policies, and implementation strategies by issue
Local Water Management Plan
234 Scandia Comprehensive Plan34 35
Appendix E
Goal/ Policy/
Implementation Strategy
Issue Reference Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
NR IS 2.7.2
NR IS 2.7.3
NR IS 2.7.4
NR Policy 2.8
NR IS 2.8.1
NR IS 2.8.2
NR IS 2.8.3
NR Policy 2.9
NR IS 2.9.1
NR IS 2.9.2
NR Policy 2.10
NR IS 2.10.1
NR IS 2.10.2
NR Policy 2.11
NR IS 2.11.1
NR IS 2.11.2
NR Goal 3
NR Policy 3.1
NR Policy 3.2
NR IS 3.2.1
NR IS 3.2.2
NR Policy 3.3
NR IS 3.3.1
NR IS 3.3.2
NR Policy 3.4
NR IS 3.4.1
NR IS 3.4.2
NR Policy 3.5
NR IS 3.5.1
NR IS 3.5.2
NR Policy 3.6
NR IS 3.6.1
NR IS 3.6.2
NR IS 3.6.3
NR Goal 4
NR Policy 4.1
NR Policy 4.2
NR IS 4.2.1
NR IS 4.2.2
Appendix E
Goal/ Policy/
Implementation Strategy
Issue Reference Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
NR Goal 5
NR Policy 5.1
NR IS 5.1.1
NR IS 5.1.2
NR IS 5.1.3
NR IS 5.1.4
NR Policy 5.2
NR IS 5.2.1
NR Policy 5.3
NR IS 5.3.1
NR Goal 6
NR Policy 6.1
NR IS 6.1.1
NR IS 6.1.2
NR IS 6.1.3
NR Policy 6.2
NR IS 6.2.1
NR IS 6.2.2
NR Goal 7
NR Policy 7.1
NR IS 7.1.1
NR IS 7.1.2
NR IS 7.1.3
NR Policy 7.2
NR IS 7.2.1
NR IS 7.2.2
NR IS 7.2.3
NR IS 7.2.4
Table E11 - LWMP goals, policies, and implementation strategies by issue Table E11 - LWMP goals, policies, and implementation strategies by issue
Local Water Management PlanLocal Water Management Plan
235Scandia Comprehensive Plan34 35
Appendix E
Goal/ Policy/
Implementation Strategy
Issue Reference Number
12345678910111213
NR IS 2.7.2
NR IS 2.7.3
NR IS 2.7.4
NR Policy 2.8
NR IS 2.8.1
NR IS 2.8.2
NR IS 2.8.3
NR Policy 2.9
NR IS 2.9.1
NR IS 2.9.2
NR Policy 2.10
NR IS 2.10.1
NR IS 2.10.2
NR Policy 2.11
NR IS 2.11.1
NR IS 2.11.2
NR Goal 3
NR Policy 3.1
NR Policy 3.2
NR IS 3.2.1
NR IS 3.2.2
NR Policy 3.3
NR IS 3.3.1
NR IS 3.3.2
NR Policy 3.4
NR IS 3.4.1
NR IS 3.4.2
NR Policy 3.5
NR IS 3.5.1
NR IS 3.5.2
NR Policy 3.6
NR IS 3.6.1
NR IS 3.6.2
NR IS 3.6.3
NR Goal 4
NR Policy 4.1
NR Policy 4.2
NR IS 4.2.1
NR IS 4.2.2
Appendix E
Goal/ Policy/
Implementation Strategy
Issue Reference Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
NR Goal 5
NR Policy 5.1
NR IS 5.1.1
NR IS 5.1.2
NR IS 5.1.3
NR IS 5.1.4
NR Policy 5.2
NR IS 5.2.1
NR Policy 5.3
NR IS 5.3.1
NR Goal 6
NR Policy 6.1
NR IS 6.1.1
NR IS 6.1.2
NR IS 6.1.3
NR Policy 6.2
NR IS 6.2.1
NR IS 6.2.2
NR Goal 7
NR Policy 7.1
NR IS 7.1.1
NR IS 7.1.2
NR IS 7.1.3
NR Policy 7.2
NR IS 7.2.1
NR IS 7.2.2
NR IS 7.2.3
NR IS 7.2.4
Table E11 - LWMP goals, policies, and implementation strategies by issue Table E11 - LWMP goals, policies, and implementation strategies by issue
Local Water Management PlanLocal Water Management Plan
236 Scandia Comprehensive Plan36 37
Appendix E
Goals, Policies and Strategies
The City of Scandia Comprehensive Plan includes goals, policies and strategies relating to natural resources,
land use, housing, parks and recreation, economic development, energy, and transportation. The goals,
policies, and strategies included in this Local Water Management Plan refl ect natural resource and land use
policies from the Comprehensive Plan. The numbering system is that of the Comprehensive Plan. The goals,
policies, and strategies are not renumbered for this Local Water Management Plan. The selected goals, poli-
cies, and strategies included here are those that relate directly to the issues identifi ed in this Plan.
NR Goal 1: Protect surface water and groundwater quality through proper installation, maintenance, and
monitoring of wastewater systems.
NR Policy 1.1: In keeping with its general rural character, Scandia plans to continue relying primar-
ily on individual on-site water and sewer systems to serve both existing and future development in ar-
eas outside the village center. (See related LU Policy 2.7 regarding Village wastewater services)
NR Policy 1.2: Alternative and experimental wastewater treatment systems designed to serve a
group of residential units may be considered for developments in the village center or as part of
Open Space Conservation Subdivision projects, provided they are privately owned and conform to
adopted ordinance standards. (See related policy LU 2.7 regarding Village wastewater services)
NR Implementation Strategy 1.2.1: The City will develop and adopt standards for the
design, installation, and maintenance of alternative and experimental wastewater treatment
systems.
NR Policy 1.3: In cooperation with Washington County, the City will enforce strict conformance
with regulations for the design, installation, and maintenance of on-site treatment systems including
minimum design, licensing, and installation requirements of the Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080.
NR Policy 1.4: Continue to operate and maintain community systems on Big Marine Lake and in
the Village. Consider the feasibility of extending centralized wastewater treatment to serve the vil-
lage area.
NR Goal 2: Preserve, protect, and enhance surface water quality in Scandia.
NR Policy 2.1: Work cooperatively with local watershed districts.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.1.1: The City will implement its Local Water Management
Plan that conforms to the standards and rules of the watershed districts.
NR Policy 2.2: Work with Washington County, local watershed districts, the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency, and other agencies to address impaired water bodies within the City.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.2.1: The City will participate in Total Maximum Daily
Load studies and Implementation Plans to address impaired water bodies within the City.
Surface Water Management Goals & Policies
Natural Resources
Wastewater Goals & Policies
NR Implementation Strategy 2.2.2: The City will provide educational materials to resi-
dents and businesses regarding the relationship between stormwater runoff and impaired
waters. (See NR Implementation Strategy 2.5.1 and 2.9.1)
NR Implementation Strategy 2.2.3: The City will develop and adopt an Operations and
Maintenance Manual that outlines “good housekeeping” practices that can be used to reduce
pollutants in stormwater runoff leaving City-owned sites. (See NR Implementation Strat-
egy 2.8.1)
NR Implementation Strategy 2.2.4: The City will work with other units of government
and other partners to identify waters in danger of becoming impaired and work to avoid
these waters being listed as impaired in the future.
NR Policy 2.3: Continue working with local watershed districts that have permitting authority in the
City to jointly review development permits for impacts on surface waters.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.3.1: The City will work with local watershed districts to
develop a streamlined process for sharing and reviewing permits with potential impacts to
surface waters.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.3.2: The City will work with local watershed districts to
create and distribute an Information Packet with information on application requirements,
deadlines, the review process, permitting requirements of the City and local watershed dis-
tricts, etc., to developers at the beginning of the development process.
NR Policy 2.4: Design new development to minimize impacts on surface water, groundwater,
fl oodplains, steep slopes, wetlands, and other environmentally sensitive areas.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.4.1: (This strategy is repeated as strategies 5.1.2 and 6.1.1)
The City will develop and adopt an ordinance requiring all development to utilize low-impact
techniques that:
• Utilize the Natural Resource Protection Areas map to identify large, connected natural
systems
• Consider the impact of development on rare plant and animal species
• Preserve the natural features of the site or utilize constructed systems that mimic the
natural hydrologic system
• Reduce storm water runoff to pre-development levels
• Retain, infi ltrate, and fi lter stormwater runoff before its release into the City’s water
bodies
• Eliminate or entrap pollutants before they enter surface waters
• Restore or enhance the ability of soils to absorb, retain, and infi ltrate water
• Minimize impervious surfaces in new development
NR Policy 2.5: Encourage landowners in already developed areas to improve stormwater drainage
to reduce the volume of runoff and polluted runoff.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.5.1: The City will provide educational materials to resi-
dents and business regarding practices that can reduce the volume of runoff or improve the
quality of runoff.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.5.2: The City may consider incentives such as tax breaks
or cost-share programs for landowners who install practices that reduce or disconnect im-
pervious surfaces or allow water to be slowed or detained in vegetated areas.
Appendix ELocal Water Management PlanLocal Water Management Plan
237Scandia Comprehensive Plan36 37
Appendix E
Goals, Policies and Strategies
The City of Scandia Comprehensive Plan includes goals, policies and strategies relating to natural resources,
land use, housing, parks and recreation, economic development, energy, and transportation. The goals,
policies, and strategies included in this Local Water Management Plan refl ect natural resource and land use
policies from the Comprehensive Plan. The numbering system is that of the Comprehensive Plan. The goals,
policies, and strategies are not renumbered for this Local Water Management Plan. The selected goals, poli-
cies, and strategies included here are those that relate directly to the issues identifi ed in this Plan.
NR Goal 1: Protect surface water and groundwater quality through proper installation, maintenance, and
monitoring of wastewater systems.
NR Policy 1.1: In keeping with its general rural character, Scandia plans to continue relying primar-
ily on individual on-site water and sewer systems to serve both existing and future development in ar-
eas outside the village center. (See related LU Policy 2.7 regarding Village wastewater services)
NR Policy 1.2: Alternative and experimental wastewater treatment systems designed to serve a
group of residential units may be considered for developments in the village center or as part of
Open Space Conservation Subdivision projects, provided they are privately owned and conform to
adopted ordinance standards. (See related policy LU 2.7 regarding Village wastewater services)
NR Implementation Strategy 1.2.1: The City will develop and adopt standards for the
design, installation, and maintenance of alternative and experimental wastewater treatment
systems.
NR Policy 1.3: In cooperation with Washington County, the City will enforce strict conformance
with regulations for the design, installation, and maintenance of on-site treatment systems including
minimum design, licensing, and installation requirements of the Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080.
NR Policy 1.4: Continue to operate and maintain community systems on Big Marine Lake and in
the Village. Consider the feasibility of extending centralized wastewater treatment to serve the vil-
lage area.
NR Goal 2: Preserve, protect, and enhance surface water quality in Scandia.
NR Policy 2.1: Work cooperatively with local watershed districts.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.1.1: The City will implement its Local Water Management
Plan that conforms to the standards and rules of the watershed districts.
NR Policy 2.2: Work with Washington County, local watershed districts, the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency, and other agencies to address impaired water bodies within the City.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.2.1: The City will participate in Total Maximum Daily
Load studies and Implementation Plans to address impaired water bodies within the City.
Surface Water Management Goals & Policies
Natural Resources
Wastewater Goals & Policies
NR Implementation Strategy 2.2.2: The City will provide educational materials to resi-
dents and businesses regarding the relationship between stormwater runoff and impaired
waters. (See NR Implementation Strategy 2.5.1 and 2.9.1)
NR Implementation Strategy 2.2.3: The City will develop and adopt an Operations and
Maintenance Manual that outlines “good housekeeping” practices that can be used to reduce
pollutants in stormwater runoff leaving City-owned sites. (See NR Implementation Strat-
egy 2.8.1)
NR Implementation Strategy 2.2.4: The City will work with other units of government
and other partners to identify waters in danger of becoming impaired and work to avoid
these waters being listed as impaired in the future.
NR Policy 2.3: Continue working with local watershed districts that have permitting authority in the
City to jointly review development permits for impacts on surface waters.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.3.1: The City will work with local watershed districts to
develop a streamlined process for sharing and reviewing permits with potential impacts to
surface waters.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.3.2: The City will work with local watershed districts to
create and distribute an Information Packet with information on application requirements,
deadlines, the review process, permitting requirements of the City and local watershed dis-
tricts, etc., to developers at the beginning of the development process.
NR Policy 2.4: Design new development to minimize impacts on surface water, groundwater,
fl oodplains, steep slopes, wetlands, and other environmentally sensitive areas.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.4.1: (This strategy is repeated as strategies 5.1.2 and 6.1.1)
The City will develop and adopt an ordinance requiring all development to utilize low-impact
techniques that:
• Utilize the Natural Resource Protection Areas map to identify large, connected natural
systems
• Consider the impact of development on rare plant and animal species
• Preserve the natural features of the site or utilize constructed systems that mimic the
natural hydrologic system
• Reduce storm water runoff to pre-development levels
• Retain, infi ltrate, and fi lter stormwater runoff before its release into the City’s water
bodies
• Eliminate or entrap pollutants before they enter surface waters
• Restore or enhance the ability of soils to absorb, retain, and infi ltrate water
• Minimize impervious surfaces in new development
NR Policy 2.5: Encourage landowners in already developed areas to improve stormwater drainage
to reduce the volume of runoff and polluted runoff.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.5.1: The City will provide educational materials to resi-
dents and business regarding practices that can reduce the volume of runoff or improve the
quality of runoff.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.5.2: The City may consider incentives such as tax breaks
or cost-share programs for landowners who install practices that reduce or disconnect im-
pervious surfaces or allow water to be slowed or detained in vegetated areas.
Appendix ELocal Water Management PlanLocal Water Management Plan
238 Scandia Comprehensive Plan38 39
NR Implementation Strategy 2.5.3: The City will help promote existing stormwater man-
agement related cost-share programs offered by local watershed districts and other partners.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.5.4: Create an inventory of stormwater facilities within the
City, both public and private, and determine whether facilities are functioning as designed.
NR Policy 2.6: Protect surface waters by enforcing the following regulations:
• State shoreland management regulations and the City’s Shoreland Ordinance
• Erosion and sedimentation control standards of the MPCA
• Wetland alteration and mitigation requirements of the Wetland Conservation Act
(WCA) and local watershed districts
NR Implementation Strategy 2.6.1: The City will work to integrate enforcement of regu-
lations designed to protect sensitive areas with the City’s other enforcement and inspection
functions.
NR Policy 2.7: Work with local watershed districts to assess wetlands and preserve them as es-
sential components of the hydrologic system and valuable wildlife habitat; restore degraded wetland
resources where possible.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.7.1: The City will cooperate with local watershed districts
to complete a functions and values assessment and will use the results to preserve and pro-
tect wetlands within the City.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.7.2: The City may consider incentives like tax breaks or
cost-share programs for land owners who restore wetland resources outside of the WCA
mitigation process.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.7.3: The City will create, protect, and enforce the creation
and preservation of upland buffers adjacent to wetlands.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.7.4: Through a change in the Subdivision Ordinance,
the City will require development applicants to delineate wetlands and complete a wetland
assessment using the MnRam 3.0 process or higher. The subdivision review process will
consider this information to determine if the development project has potential to negatively
impact a protected wetland. If potential impact is identifi ed, mitigation for the impact shall
be required as part of development approval.
NR Policy 2.8: Demonstrate a commitment to improving surface water quality by incorporating
best practices on City owned property.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.8.1: The City will limit the use of pesticides and herbi-
cides on City-owned property.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.8.2: The City will implement innovative stormwater man-
agement practices to control runoff from City-owned property.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.8.3: The City will develop and adopt an Operations and
Maintenance Manual for City-owned property that outlines “good housekeeping” practices
that can be used to reduce pollutants in stormwater runoff leaving City-owned sites. (See
NR Implementation Strategy 2.2.3)
NR Policy 2.9: Provide educational materials to residents about the connection between human
activities (e.g. impervious surfaces, lawn care, winter sidewalk and road maintenance, etc) and water
quality and the cumulative effects of individual actions.
Appendix E
NR Implementation Strategy 2.9.1: The City will provide educational materials to resi-
dents and businesses regarding the relationship between stormwater runoff and water qual-
ity. (See NR Implementation Strategy 2.2.2)
NR Implementation Strategy 2.9.2: The City will support and promote the existing
water-related education efforts of local watershed districts, Washington County, and other
agencies.
NR Policy 2.10: Consider the appropriate limitations on impervious surfaces on residential lots and
appropriate use of pervious driveway and parking area surfaces.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.10.1: Consider lowering the allowed percentage of imper-
vious surface per lot for new homes in lakeshore areas, particularly around those lakes where
water quality is in decline.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.10.2: Encourage the installation of pervious paving
surfaces in the City’s development ordinances and develop or provide existing educational
material about proper installation and maintenance.
NR Policy 2.11: Manage water quantity by continuing to protect Scandia’s fl oodways and fl ood
fringe areas as critical infrastructure mitigating fl ood risk.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.11.1: Continue to enforce Scandia’s fl oodplain regulations.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.11.2: Work with DNR and FEMA to update fl oodplain
maps and zones in order to refl ect changes in watershed development patterns and storm
intensity.
NR Goal 3: Preserve and protect the quantity and quality of groundwater.
NR Policy 3.1: In keeping with its general rural character, Scandia plans to continue relying primar-
ily on individual on-site water systems to serve both existing and future development.
NR Policy 3.2: Identify sensitive groundwater recharge areas and groundwater dependent natural
resources and use this information to guide development; Limit contaminant generating land use
activities to areas where the potential to contaminate groundwater is low.
NR Implementation Strategy 3.2.1: Provide educational materials to residents about how
to avoid damage to groundwater resources when using household chemicals in Individual
Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS).
NR Implementation Strategy 3.2.2: The City will develop and adopt performance stan-
dards for contaminant generating land use activities such as fuel storage and animal agricul-
ture in areas with the potential to contaminate groundwater.
NR Policy 3.3: Promote water conservation.
NR Implementation Strategy 3.3.1: The City will develop education programs that en-
courage water users to practice water conservation techniques.
NR Implementation Strategy 3.3.2: The City will implement water conservation practices
in city-owned buildings.
Water Supply and Groundwater Management Goals & Policies
Appendix ELocal Water Management PlanLocal Water Management Plan
239Scandia Comprehensive Plan38 39
NR Implementation Strategy 2.5.3: The City will help promote existing stormwater man-
agement related cost-share programs offered by local watershed districts and other partners.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.5.4: Create an inventory of stormwater facilities within the
City, both public and private, and determine whether facilities are functioning as designed.
NR Policy 2.6: Protect surface waters by enforcing the following regulations:
• State shoreland management regulations and the City’s Shoreland Ordinance
• Erosion and sedimentation control standards of the MPCA
• Wetland alteration and mitigation requirements of the Wetland Conservation Act
(WCA) and local watershed districts
NR Implementation Strategy 2.6.1: The City will work to integrate enforcement of regu-
lations designed to protect sensitive areas with the City’s other enforcement and inspection
functions.
NR Policy 2.7: Work with local watershed districts to assess wetlands and preserve them as es-
sential components of the hydrologic system and valuable wildlife habitat; restore degraded wetland
resources where possible.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.7.1: The City will cooperate with local watershed districts
to complete a functions and values assessment and will use the results to preserve and pro-
tect wetlands within the City.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.7.2: The City may consider incentives like tax breaks or
cost-share programs for land owners who restore wetland resources outside of the WCA
mitigation process.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.7.3: The City will create, protect, and enforce the creation
and preservation of upland buffers adjacent to wetlands.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.7.4: Through a change in the Subdivision Ordinance,
the City will require development applicants to delineate wetlands and complete a wetland
assessment using the MnRam 3.0 process or higher. The subdivision review process will
consider this information to determine if the development project has potential to negatively
impact a protected wetland. If potential impact is identifi ed, mitigation for the impact shall
be required as part of development approval.
NR Policy 2.8: Demonstrate a commitment to improving surface water quality by incorporating
best practices on City owned property.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.8.1: The City will limit the use of pesticides and herbi-
cides on City-owned property.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.8.2: The City will implement innovative stormwater man-
agement practices to control runoff from City-owned property.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.8.3: The City will develop and adopt an Operations and
Maintenance Manual for City-owned property that outlines “good housekeeping” practices
that can be used to reduce pollutants in stormwater runoff leaving City-owned sites. (See
NR Implementation Strategy 2.2.3)
NR Policy 2.9: Provide educational materials to residents about the connection between human
activities (e.g. impervious surfaces, lawn care, winter sidewalk and road maintenance, etc) and water
quality and the cumulative effects of individual actions.
Appendix E
NR Implementation Strategy 2.9.1: The City will provide educational materials to resi-
dents and businesses regarding the relationship between stormwater runoff and water qual-
ity. (See NR Implementation Strategy 2.2.2)
NR Implementation Strategy 2.9.2: The City will support and promote the existing
water-related education efforts of local watershed districts, Washington County, and other
agencies.
NR Policy 2.10: Consider the appropriate limitations on impervious surfaces on residential lots and
appropriate use of pervious driveway and parking area surfaces.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.10.1: Consider lowering the allowed percentage of imper-
vious surface per lot for new homes in lakeshore areas, particularly around those lakes where
water quality is in decline.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.10.2: Encourage the installation of pervious paving
surfaces in the City’s development ordinances and develop or provide existing educational
material about proper installation and maintenance.
NR Policy 2.11: Manage water quantity by continuing to protect Scandia’s fl oodways and fl ood
fringe areas as critical infrastructure mitigating fl ood risk.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.11.1: Continue to enforce Scandia’s fl oodplain regulations.
NR Implementation Strategy 2.11.2: Work with DNR and FEMA to update fl oodplain
maps and zones in order to refl ect changes in watershed development patterns and storm
intensity.
NR Goal 3: Preserve and protect the quantity and quality of groundwater.
NR Policy 3.1: In keeping with its general rural character, Scandia plans to continue relying primar-
ily on individual on-site water systems to serve both existing and future development.
NR Policy 3.2: Identify sensitive groundwater recharge areas and groundwater dependent natural
resources and use this information to guide development; Limit contaminant generating land use
activities to areas where the potential to contaminate groundwater is low.
NR Implementation Strategy 3.2.1: Provide educational materials to residents about how
to avoid damage to groundwater resources when using household chemicals in Individual
Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS).
NR Implementation Strategy 3.2.2: The City will develop and adopt performance stan-
dards for contaminant generating land use activities such as fuel storage and animal agricul-
ture in areas with the potential to contaminate groundwater.
NR Policy 3.3: Promote water conservation.
NR Implementation Strategy 3.3.1: The City will develop education programs that en-
courage water users to practice water conservation techniques.
NR Implementation Strategy 3.3.2: The City will implement water conservation practices
in city-owned buildings.
Water Supply and Groundwater Management Goals & Policies
Appendix ELocal Water Management PlanLocal Water Management Plan
240 Scandia Comprehensive Plan40 41
NR Policy 3.4: Require developers to restore the ability of soils to absorb, retain, and infi ltrate
water following site development through the use of practices such as compost amendments and soil
ripping.
NR Implementation Strategy 3.4.1: The City will develop and adopt an ordinance that
requires developers to restore soils compacted during site development through the use of
practices such as compost amendments and soil ripping.
NR Implementation Strategy 3.4.2: The City will encourage local refuse haulers to
develop curbside collection of materials that can be composted (both household and yard
waste) to create a local supply of compost.
NR Policy 3.5: Encourage the use of stormwater management techniques on developed sites that
fi lter and infi ltrate stormwater runoff to help recharge groundwater systems. (Related to NR 2.5
and 2.6)
NR Implementation Strategy 3.5.1: The City will provide educational materials to resi-
dents and businesses regarding stormwater management techniques that fi lter and infi ltrate
stormwater runoff to help recharge groundwater systems.
NR Implementation Strategy 3.5.2: The City will consider incentives such as tax breaks
or cost-share programs for landowners who install stormwater management techniques that
fi lter and infi ltrate stormwater runoff to help recharge groundwater systems.
NR Policy 3.6: Promote the use of native species that do not require irrigation in order to reduce
groundwater use.
NR Implementation Strategy 3.6.1: The City will provide educational materials to resi-
dents and businesses on utilizing native plants in their landscaping.
NR Implementation Strategy 3.6.2: The City will demonstrate a commitment to the use
of native plants by making use of them in landscaping on City-owned property.
NR Implementation Strategy 3.6.3: The City will continue to require native plants in
landscaping for new developments.
NR Goal 4: To retain the rural character of Scandia and protect natural resources, maintain large, connected
areas of open space, rather than small, fragmented natural areas.
NR Policy 4.1: Scandia will continue to coordinate with both the Minnesota Department of Natu-
ral Resources and Washington County on plans for the long term acquisition and development of
William O’Brien State Park and Big Marine Park Reserve.
NR Policy 4.2: Encourage development proposals to consider the context of natural areas on the
site and preserve natural areas that connect to off-site natural areas.
NR Implementation Strategy 4.2.1: The City will use the natural resource priorities map
and the 2006 Open Space Plan map to identify large, connected natural systems and will
encourage and investigate various options for the protection of these areas.
NR Implementation Strategy 4.2.2: The City will develop and adopt an ordinance requir-
ing all development to utilize low-impact techniques.
Natural Areas Goals & Policies
Appendix E
NR Goal 5: Preserve high quality natural areas and enhance degraded areas.
NR Policy 5.1: Work with property owners, other governmental units and agencies, and developers
to protect high quality natural areas identifi ed on the natural resource priorities map.
NR Implementation Strategy 5.1.1: The City will work with Washington County and
other partners to develop a land acquisition program for high quality areas identifi ed on the
natural resource priorities map.
NR Implementation Strategy 5.1.2: The City will develop and adopt an ordinance requir-
ing all development to utilize low-impact techniques.
NR Implementation Strategy 5.1.3: The City will investigate the concept of Transfer of
Development Rights (TDR) as a means of compensating landowners who give up develop-
ment rights in order to meet community goals of agricultural preservation, natural resource
protection, and life-cycle and affordable housing. The City will establish a study committee
to evaluate the use of TDR and report conclusions to the City Council within one year after
adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. (See related LU Policy 1.2)
NR Implementation Strategy 5.1.4: The City will investigate a Purchase of Development
Rights (PDR) program to obtain conservation easements for lands with high preservation
value.
NR Policy 5.2: Require development proposals to identify and protect high quality natural areas to
the greatest extent possible.
NR Implementation Strategy 5.2.1: The City will continue to use its Open Space Conser-
vation Subdivision Ordinance to require use of low-impact techniques.
NR Policy 5.3: Encourage the restoration of indigenous plant communities and wildlife habitat in
all private and public developments.
NR Implementation Strategy 5.3.1: The City may consider incentives like tax breaks, den-
sity bonuses, or cost-share programs for developers and land owners who restore indigenous
plant communities and wildlife habitat.
NR Goal 6: Protect and preserve native, endangered, threatened and unique plants and animals.
NR Policy 6.1: The City will review development proposals to ensure minimal impacts on rare plant
and animal species.
NR Implementation Strategy 6.1.1: The City will develop and adopt an ordinance requir-
ing all development to utilize low-impact techniques.
NR Implementation Strategy 6.1.2: The City will coordinate with the DNR on the review
of developments with potential locations of rare plant and animal species.
NR Implementation Strategy 6.1.3: The City will use MLCCS criteria for requiring inven-
tories as part of the development process.
NR Policy 6.2: Strive to connect high quality natural areas through natural corridors on public or
private land in order to allow for wildlife movement among habitats.
Appendix ELocal Water Management PlanLocal Water Management Plan
241Scandia Comprehensive Plan40 41
NR Policy 3.4: Require developers to restore the ability of soils to absorb, retain, and infi ltrate
water following site development through the use of practices such as compost amendments and soil
ripping.
NR Implementation Strategy 3.4.1: The City will develop and adopt an ordinance that
requires developers to restore soils compacted during site development through the use of
practices such as compost amendments and soil ripping.
NR Implementation Strategy 3.4.2: The City will encourage local refuse haulers to
develop curbside collection of materials that can be composted (both household and yard
waste) to create a local supply of compost.
NR Policy 3.5: Encourage the use of stormwater management techniques on developed sites that
fi lter and infi ltrate stormwater runoff to help recharge groundwater systems. (Related to NR 2.5
and 2.6)
NR Implementation Strategy 3.5.1: The City will provide educational materials to resi-
dents and businesses regarding stormwater management techniques that fi lter and infi ltrate
stormwater runoff to help recharge groundwater systems.
NR Implementation Strategy 3.5.2: The City will consider incentives such as tax breaks
or cost-share programs for landowners who install stormwater management techniques that
fi lter and infi ltrate stormwater runoff to help recharge groundwater systems.
NR Policy 3.6: Promote the use of native species that do not require irrigation in order to reduce
groundwater use.
NR Implementation Strategy 3.6.1: The City will provide educational materials to resi-
dents and businesses on utilizing native plants in their landscaping.
NR Implementation Strategy 3.6.2: The City will demonstrate a commitment to the use
of native plants by making use of them in landscaping on City-owned property.
NR Implementation Strategy 3.6.3: The City will continue to require native plants in
landscaping for new developments.
NR Goal 4: To retain the rural character of Scandia and protect natural resources, maintain large, connected
areas of open space, rather than small, fragmented natural areas.
NR Policy 4.1: Scandia will continue to coordinate with both the Minnesota Department of Natu-
ral Resources and Washington County on plans for the long term acquisition and development of
William O’Brien State Park and Big Marine Park Reserve.
NR Policy 4.2: Encourage development proposals to consider the context of natural areas on the
site and preserve natural areas that connect to off-site natural areas.
NR Implementation Strategy 4.2.1: The City will use the natural resource priorities map
and the 2006 Open Space Plan map to identify large, connected natural systems and will
encourage and investigate various options for the protection of these areas.
NR Implementation Strategy 4.2.2: The City will develop and adopt an ordinance requir-
ing all development to utilize low-impact techniques.
Natural Areas Goals & Policies
Appendix E
NR Goal 5: Preserve high quality natural areas and enhance degraded areas.
NR Policy 5.1: Work with property owners, other governmental units and agencies, and developers
to protect high quality natural areas identifi ed on the natural resource priorities map.
NR Implementation Strategy 5.1.1: The City will work with Washington County and
other partners to develop a land acquisition program for high quality areas identifi ed on the
natural resource priorities map.
NR Implementation Strategy 5.1.2: The City will develop and adopt an ordinance requir-
ing all development to utilize low-impact techniques.
NR Implementation Strategy 5.1.3: The City will investigate the concept of Transfer of
Development Rights (TDR) as a means of compensating landowners who give up develop-
ment rights in order to meet community goals of agricultural preservation, natural resource
protection, and life-cycle and affordable housing. The City will establish a study committee
to evaluate the use of TDR and report conclusions to the City Council within one year after
adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. (See related LU Policy 1.2)
NR Implementation Strategy 5.1.4: The City will investigate a Purchase of Development
Rights (PDR) program to obtain conservation easements for lands with high preservation
value.
NR Policy 5.2: Require development proposals to identify and protect high quality natural areas to
the greatest extent possible.
NR Implementation Strategy 5.2.1: The City will continue to use its Open Space Conser-
vation Subdivision Ordinance to require use of low-impact techniques.
NR Policy 5.3: Encourage the restoration of indigenous plant communities and wildlife habitat in
all private and public developments.
NR Implementation Strategy 5.3.1: The City may consider incentives like tax breaks, den-
sity bonuses, or cost-share programs for developers and land owners who restore indigenous
plant communities and wildlife habitat.
NR Goal 6: Protect and preserve native, endangered, threatened and unique plants and animals.
NR Policy 6.1: The City will review development proposals to ensure minimal impacts on rare plant
and animal species.
NR Implementation Strategy 6.1.1: The City will develop and adopt an ordinance requir-
ing all development to utilize low-impact techniques.
NR Implementation Strategy 6.1.2: The City will coordinate with the DNR on the review
of developments with potential locations of rare plant and animal species.
NR Implementation Strategy 6.1.3: The City will use MLCCS criteria for requiring inven-
tories as part of the development process.
NR Policy 6.2: Strive to connect high quality natural areas through natural corridors on public or
private land in order to allow for wildlife movement among habitats.
Appendix ELocal Water Management PlanLocal Water Management Plan
242 Scandia Comprehensive Plan42 43
NR Implementation Strategy 6.2.1: The City will develop and adopt a corridor assess-
ment that identifi es key connections between existing high quality natural areas.
NR Implementation Strategy 6.2.2: The City will encourage developers to use the natural
resource corridor assessment map to identify and protect key connections between natural
systems.
NR Goal 7: Eliminate, reduce or mitigate the negative effects of invasive species on natural areas.
NR Policy 7.1: Encourage public and private development to landscape with noninvasive, native
species.
NR Implementation Strategy 7.1.1: The City will consider incentives like tax breaks,
density bonuses, or cost-share programs for developers and land owners who utilize native
plants in their landscaping. (See related NR Policy 3.6)
NR Implementation Strategy 7.1.2: The City will demonstrate a commitment to the use
of native plants continuing to require native landscaping on City-owned property.
NR Implementation Strategy 7.1.3: Encourage local nurseries to promote native species
by clearly marking them or providing fl yers to buyers. Work with local nurseries to provide
educational programs on native landscaping that protects surface water and groundwater.
NR Policy 7.2: Promote public awareness about the potential impacts of invasive species.
NR Implementation Strategy 7.2.1: The City will provide educational materials to resi-
dents on the environmental, economic, and social impacts of invasive species.
NR Implementation Strategy 7.2.2: The City will teach the public how to prevent the
transportation of invasive species from one land and water habitat to another.
NR Implementation Strategy 7.2.3: The City will work with the Washington Conserva-
tion District, the DNR, and other agencies to promote existing invasive species education
efforts (such as the DNR’s Invasive Species Program) within City boundaries.
NR Implementation Strategy 7.2.4: The City will encourage removal of invasive and
exotic plants and animal species.
Appendix E
The goals, policies, and strategies below are a selection from the City of Scandia Compre-
hensive Plan that relate to local water planning.
The community of Scandia has shown a consistently high level of commitment to preserv-
ing its rural character, as expressed in the 1998 Comprehensive Plan and continuing through
its transition from township to City. The policies in this section, therefore, continue to build
upon this commitment, while accommodating a reasonable amount of new development
that is compatible with the City’s natural resources and rural and small-town character. The
general goal and policies below are followed by goals and policies that pertain to each of the
future land use areas shown in Map 27 - Future Land Use Areas (page 106).
Land Use
General Goals and Policies
LU Goal 1: Maintain the City’s unique rural and small-town character and its natural landscape while ac-
commodating a reasonable amount of new development that contributes to, rather than detracts from, that
character.
LU Policy 1.1: Establish standards to ensure that new development responds to the surrounding
landscape and preserves scenic, historic and natural resources wherever possible.
LU Implementation Strategy 1.1.1: Modify existing zoning districts and create new zoning
districts that are compatible with the preferred mix of land uses described in each Compre-
hensive Plan future land use areas.
LU Implementation Strategy 1.1.2: Explore the feasibility of initiating historic preserva-
tion efforts that would encourage the preservation of historic buildings, such as a revolving
grant or loan program for façade improvements.
LU Implementation Strategy 1.1.3: Work with Washington County Historical Society and
Gammelgarden to provide educational materials to residents about the City’s historic build-
ings and sites, using techniques such as seasonal tours of buildings in the village center or
awards for exemplary renovations.
LU Implementation Strategy 1.1.4: Encourage preserving historic landmark buildings -
such as barns, village center structures, historic log homes - starting with an inventory and
developing program criteria to identify structures.
LU Policy 1.2: Investigate the concept of Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) as a means of
compensating landowners who are asked to give up development rights in order to meet community
goals of agricultural preservation, natural resource protection, and life-cycle and affordable housing.
LU Implementation Strategy 1.2.1: Establish a study committee to evaluate the use of
TDR and report conclusions to the City Council within one year after adoption of the Com-
prehensive Plan.
LU Policy 1.3: Establish standards that protect Scandia’s scenic views by minimizing the visual
impact of new development.
LU Implementation Strategy 1.3.1: Continue developing the City’s inventory of scenic
resources – scenic roads and viewsheds – using GIS methodology and the Visual Quality
Appendix ELocal Water Management PlanLocal Water Management Plan
243Scandia Comprehensive Plan42 43
NR Implementation Strategy 6.2.1: The City will develop and adopt a corridor assess-
ment that identifi es key connections between existing high quality natural areas.
NR Implementation Strategy 6.2.2: The City will encourage developers to use the natural
resource corridor assessment map to identify and protect key connections between natural
systems.
NR Goal 7: Eliminate, reduce or mitigate the negative effects of invasive species on natural areas.
NR Policy 7.1: Encourage public and private development to landscape with noninvasive, native
species.
NR Implementation Strategy 7.1.1: The City will consider incentives like tax breaks,
density bonuses, or cost-share programs for developers and land owners who utilize native
plants in their landscaping. (See related NR Policy 3.6)
NR Implementation Strategy 7.1.2: The City will demonstrate a commitment to the use
of native plants continuing to require native landscaping on City-owned property.
NR Implementation Strategy 7.1.3: Encourage local nurseries to promote native species
by clearly marking them or providing fl yers to buyers. Work with local nurseries to provide
educational programs on native landscaping that protects surface water and groundwater.
NR Policy 7.2: Promote public awareness about the potential impacts of invasive species.
NR Implementation Strategy 7.2.1: The City will provide educational materials to resi-
dents on the environmental, economic, and social impacts of invasive species.
NR Implementation Strategy 7.2.2: The City will teach the public how to prevent the
transportation of invasive species from one land and water habitat to another.
NR Implementation Strategy 7.2.3: The City will work with the Washington Conserva-
tion District, the DNR, and other agencies to promote existing invasive species education
efforts (such as the DNR’s Invasive Species Program) within City boundaries.
NR Implementation Strategy 7.2.4: The City will encourage removal of invasive and
exotic plants and animal species.
Appendix E
The goals, policies, and strategies below are a selection from the City of Scandia Compre-
hensive Plan that relate to local water planning.
The community of Scandia has shown a consistently high level of commitment to preserv-
ing its rural character, as expressed in the 1998 Comprehensive Plan and continuing through
its transition from township to City. The policies in this section, therefore, continue to build
upon this commitment, while accommodating a reasonable amount of new development
that is compatible with the City’s natural resources and rural and small-town character. The
general goal and policies below are followed by goals and policies that pertain to each of the
future land use areas shown in Map 27 - Future Land Use Areas (page 106).
Land Use
General Goals and Policies
LU Goal 1: Maintain the City’s unique rural and small-town character and its natural landscape while ac-
commodating a reasonable amount of new development that contributes to, rather than detracts from, that
character.
LU Policy 1.1: Establish standards to ensure that new development responds to the surrounding
landscape and preserves scenic, historic and natural resources wherever possible.
LU Implementation Strategy 1.1.1: Modify existing zoning districts and create new zoning
districts that are compatible with the preferred mix of land uses described in each Compre-
hensive Plan future land use areas.
LU Implementation Strategy 1.1.2: Explore the feasibility of initiating historic preserva-
tion efforts that would encourage the preservation of historic buildings, such as a revolving
grant or loan program for façade improvements.
LU Implementation Strategy 1.1.3: Work with Washington County Historical Society and
Gammelgarden to provide educational materials to residents about the City’s historic build-
ings and sites, using techniques such as seasonal tours of buildings in the village center or
awards for exemplary renovations.
LU Implementation Strategy 1.1.4: Encourage preserving historic landmark buildings -
such as barns, village center structures, historic log homes - starting with an inventory and
developing program criteria to identify structures.
LU Policy 1.2: Investigate the concept of Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) as a means of
compensating landowners who are asked to give up development rights in order to meet community
goals of agricultural preservation, natural resource protection, and life-cycle and affordable housing.
LU Implementation Strategy 1.2.1: Establish a study committee to evaluate the use of
TDR and report conclusions to the City Council within one year after adoption of the Com-
prehensive Plan.
LU Policy 1.3: Establish standards that protect Scandia’s scenic views by minimizing the visual
impact of new development.
LU Implementation Strategy 1.3.1: Continue developing the City’s inventory of scenic
resources – scenic roads and viewsheds – using GIS methodology and the Visual Quality
Appendix ELocal Water Management PlanLocal Water Management Plan
244 Scandia Comprehensive Plan44 45
LU Policy 2.3: Create an enhanced and economically healthy village center.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.3.1: Consider the feasibility of extending centralized
wastewater treatment to serve the village area.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.3.2: Provide for new commercial development adjacent to
existing commercial areas in land use regulation.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.3.3: Consider regulatory and fi nancial incentives for pro-
grams to encourage existing building owners to make changes to meet design standards for
the preservation, adaptive reuse, and design improvement of existing traditional structures.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.3.4: Continue to focus public and civic facilities and
activities within the village center (with the exception of parks and trails which may occur in
any area).
LU Policy 2.4: Encourage tourism and recreation businesses in the village area.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.4.1: Bring the Gateway Trail extension to the village area.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.4.2: Create pedestrian and bicycle connections through
the village area, centering on the village core area.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.4.3: Consider lodging land uses that fi t the character of
the village and can be developed consistent with planned infrastructure capacity.
LU Goal 3: Establish growth areas surrounding the Village Center, intended to support primarily single and
multiple family residential uses on lot sizes refl ective of the existing village lot sizes.
LU Policy 3.1: Encourage single- and multiple-family residential uses that are compatible with adja-
cent land uses and use patterns in the village center and refl ect the character of the village area.
LU Implementation Strategy 3.1.1: Create a new Village Neighborhood zoning district
that emphasizes residential lands uses on small lots. The density and minimum lot size of
the Village Neighborhood areas will be 1 dwelling unit per 2.5 acres. Bonus densities up to
1 dwelling unit per acre may be earned as an incentive for providing multi-family or life-cycle
housing or use of Transfer of Development Rights.
LU Implementation Strategy 3.1.2: Establish design standards and guidelines to ensure
that new residential buildings are compatible with existing historic buildings in terms of
building height and massing, placement on the lot, and garage and driveway placement.
LU Implementation Strategy 3.1.3: Consider the Village Neighborhood district as a re-
ceiving area for a possible Transfer of Development Rights program. (See LU Policy 1.2)
LU Policy 3.2: Provide an integrated, internally-connected street system connecting village neigh-
borhood to the village center.
LU Implementation Strategy 3.2.1: Develop street and pedestrian path standards for new
development that avoids cul-de-sac development and provides for pedestrian connections to
the village center.
LU Policy 3.3: Encourage development of new neighborhoods that relate to their natural setting.
Analysis procedure. Use the scenic inventory for regulatory purposes, design review, and
to provide educational materials to residents and landowners about the quality of these
resources. Work with landowners prior to development to develop site-by-site strategies for
protecting scenic resources.
LU Implementation Strategy 1.3.2: Require landscaping along major collector roads to
minimize visual impact of new development.
LU Policy 1.4: Emphasize sensitivity to community character in new development and redevel-
opment, whether that character is expressed by historic buildings, agricultural views and activities,
natural resource, scenic views, dark skies, a quiet setting, or other elements that are important to the
City’s residents.
LU Implementation Strategy 1.4.1: To protect Scandia’s community character, develop
standards or guidelines for the design of new development and redevelopment are needed.
LU Policy 1.5: Support agriculture as a basic economic activity in the City of Scandia by supporting
the right to farm over other land uses in land use areas where agriculture is a primary use.
LU Implementation Strategy 1.5.1: Create programs to inform new landowners about
potential impacts of living in agricultural areas.
LU Goal 2: Reinforce the village center as the social and economic focal point of the community.
LU Policy 2.1: Encourage commercial, offi ce, limited industrial, residential, institutional and civic
uses that complement existing uses and use patterns.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.1.1: Create a new Village Mixed Use (VMU) zoning
district that emphasizes retail, commercial, and light industrial uses. Establish densities
consistent with existing lot sizes. Lot sizes will also depend on the availability of community
wastewater facilities.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.1.2: Establish design standards and guidelines to ensure
that new commercial buildings refl ect “downtown” character in their size, massing, setbacks,
and other attributes. Promote the use of guidelines for new buildings to encourage architec-
tural design that is compatible with its surroundings.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.1.3: Establish design standards to improve the quality and
appearance of light industrial development in the village center.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.1.4: Consider the VMU district as a receiving zone for a
possible Transfer of Development Rights program. (See LU Policy 1.2)
LU Policy 2.2: Provide for easy pedestrian movement in the village center and connections to sur-
rounding areas.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.2.1: Plan for sidewalks or pedestrian pathways along all
existing and new streets within the village center, and consider developing pedestrian con-
nections where streets cannot connect neighborhoods with the village center.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.2.2: Plan for new street connections between the village
center and nearby areas. (See Map 31 - Planned Village Transportation Improvements)
Village Mixed-Use Goal and Policies
Appendix E
Village Neighborhood Goal and Policies
Appendix ELocal Water Management PlanLocal Water Management Plan
245Scandia Comprehensive Plan44 45
LU Policy 2.3: Create an enhanced and economically healthy village center.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.3.1: Consider the feasibility of extending centralized
wastewater treatment to serve the village area.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.3.2: Provide for new commercial development adjacent to
existing commercial areas in land use regulation.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.3.3: Consider regulatory and fi nancial incentives for pro-
grams to encourage existing building owners to make changes to meet design standards for
the preservation, adaptive reuse, and design improvement of existing traditional structures.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.3.4: Continue to focus public and civic facilities and
activities within the village center (with the exception of parks and trails which may occur in
any area).
LU Policy 2.4: Encourage tourism and recreation businesses in the village area.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.4.1: Bring the Gateway Trail extension to the village area.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.4.2: Create pedestrian and bicycle connections through
the village area, centering on the village core area.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.4.3: Consider lodging land uses that fi t the character of
the village and can be developed consistent with planned infrastructure capacity.
LU Goal 3: Establish growth areas surrounding the Village Center, intended to support primarily single and
multiple family residential uses on lot sizes refl ective of the existing village lot sizes.
LU Policy 3.1: Encourage single- and multiple-family residential uses that are compatible with adja-
cent land uses and use patterns in the village center and refl ect the character of the village area.
LU Implementation Strategy 3.1.1: Create a new Village Neighborhood zoning district
that emphasizes residential lands uses on small lots. The density and minimum lot size of
the Village Neighborhood areas will be 1 dwelling unit per 2.5 acres. Bonus densities up to
1 dwelling unit per acre may be earned as an incentive for providing multi-family or life-cycle
housing or use of Transfer of Development Rights.
LU Implementation Strategy 3.1.2: Establish design standards and guidelines to ensure
that new residential buildings are compatible with existing historic buildings in terms of
building height and massing, placement on the lot, and garage and driveway placement.
LU Implementation Strategy 3.1.3: Consider the Village Neighborhood district as a re-
ceiving area for a possible Transfer of Development Rights program. (See LU Policy 1.2)
LU Policy 3.2: Provide an integrated, internally-connected street system connecting village neigh-
borhood to the village center.
LU Implementation Strategy 3.2.1: Develop street and pedestrian path standards for new
development that avoids cul-de-sac development and provides for pedestrian connections to
the village center.
LU Policy 3.3: Encourage development of new neighborhoods that relate to their natural setting.
Analysis procedure. Use the scenic inventory for regulatory purposes, design review, and
to provide educational materials to residents and landowners about the quality of these
resources. Work with landowners prior to development to develop site-by-site strategies for
protecting scenic resources.
LU Implementation Strategy 1.3.2: Require landscaping along major collector roads to
minimize visual impact of new development.
LU Policy 1.4: Emphasize sensitivity to community character in new development and redevel-
opment, whether that character is expressed by historic buildings, agricultural views and activities,
natural resource, scenic views, dark skies, a quiet setting, or other elements that are important to the
City’s residents.
LU Implementation Strategy 1.4.1: To protect Scandia’s community character, develop
standards or guidelines for the design of new development and redevelopment are needed.
LU Policy 1.5: Support agriculture as a basic economic activity in the City of Scandia by supporting
the right to farm over other land uses in land use areas where agriculture is a primary use.
LU Implementation Strategy 1.5.1: Create programs to inform new landowners about
potential impacts of living in agricultural areas.
LU Goal 2: Reinforce the village center as the social and economic focal point of the community.
LU Policy 2.1: Encourage commercial, offi ce, limited industrial, residential, institutional and civic
uses that complement existing uses and use patterns.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.1.1: Create a new Village Mixed Use (VMU) zoning
district that emphasizes retail, commercial, and light industrial uses. Establish densities
consistent with existing lot sizes. Lot sizes will also depend on the availability of community
wastewater facilities.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.1.2: Establish design standards and guidelines to ensure
that new commercial buildings refl ect “downtown” character in their size, massing, setbacks,
and other attributes. Promote the use of guidelines for new buildings to encourage architec-
tural design that is compatible with its surroundings.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.1.3: Establish design standards to improve the quality and
appearance of light industrial development in the village center.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.1.4: Consider the VMU district as a receiving zone for a
possible Transfer of Development Rights program. (See LU Policy 1.2)
LU Policy 2.2: Provide for easy pedestrian movement in the village center and connections to sur-
rounding areas.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.2.1: Plan for sidewalks or pedestrian pathways along all
existing and new streets within the village center, and consider developing pedestrian con-
nections where streets cannot connect neighborhoods with the village center.
LU Implementation Strategy 2.2.2: Plan for new street connections between the village
center and nearby areas. (See Map 31 - Planned Village Transportation Improvements)
Village Mixed-Use Goal and Policies
Appendix E
Village Neighborhood Goal and Policies
Appendix ELocal Water Management PlanLocal Water Management Plan
246 Scandia Comprehensive Plan46 47
LU Implementation Strategy 5.1.3: Investigate the feasibility of small-scale programs to
assist agricultural producers and promote Scandia as an agricultural-friendly community. For
example, programs matching farmers wishing to rent land for cultivation with landowners or
homeowners associations with available land, or programs offering seasonal tours of farms
and farm-related enterprises.
LU Policy 5.2: Encourage Transfer of Development Rights out of Agricultural Core areas as a
means of realizing a portion of the development value of land while keeping it in agricultural pro-
duction. (See LU Policy 1.2)
LU Implementation Strategy 5.2.1: Establish a study committee to evaluate the use of
TDR for achieving agricultural preservation, natural resource protection, and life-cycle and
affordable housing goals. Report back to City Council with recommendations within one
year after the adoption of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan.
LU Policy 5.3: When siting new structures, roads or drives, consider how best to preserve the vi-
ability of agricultural operations.
LU Implementation Strategy 5.3.1: Develop standards for Open Space Conservation
Subdivisions that are specifi c to agricultural protection.
LU Policy 5.4: Encourage participation in the Agricultural Preserves Program.
LU Implementation Strategy 5.4.1: Create an agricultural preserves overlay district to
encourage continued or expanded agricultural land uses in the agricultural core future land
use area and the general rural future land use area.
LU Implementation Strategy 5.4.2: Promote the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves
Program as a voluntary means for land owners in the agricultural core and general rural areas
to meet community character and stewardship goals. (See ED Implementation Strategy
4.3.2)
LU Goal 6: Provide for a wide range of land uses that are able to coexist within a rural setting, including
traditional and specialty agriculture, horse and hobby farms, limited raising of animals, market gardening, and
limited residential development and institutional use.
LU Policy 6.1: Allow a broader mix of compatible rural land uses than in the agricultural core land
use area.
LU Implementation Strategy 6.1.1: Create a new general rural zoning district that com-
bines both agricultural production and single-family residential uses, along with parks, com-
mercial recreation, and similar rural uses. Allow a density of 4 dwelling units per 40 acres
with a minimum allowed lot size of 2 acres (lot averaging is not required).
LU Implementation Strategy 6.1.2: Limit use of smaller lots for inappropriate activities
that have noise and other nuisance impacts on surrounding areas.
LU Policy 6.2: Require development to protect natural features.
LU Implementation Strategy 6.2.1: Develop standards for Open Space Conservation
Subdivisions that protect priority natural features in General Rural areas as identifi ed within
Scandia’s Natural Resource Protection Areas overlay. Bonus densities of up to 75% of the
LU Implementation Strategy 3.3.1: Provide pedestrian access to parks and trails and
community destinations.
LU Implementation Strategy 3.3.2: Consider conservation performance standards to
protect natural features in and near the village center.
LU Implementation Strategy 3.3.3: Consider landscaping standards for new development
along the public right-of-way.
LU Goal 4.1: Ensure that natural resources are taken into account prior to any land use decisions.
LU Policy 4.1: Establish minimum protection standards for priority natural resources.
LU Implementation Strategy 4.1.1: Create performance standards for priority natural
features identifi ed in Scandia’s Natural Resource priorities maps and component maps.
LU Goal 4.2: Protect natural resources through performance and site design standards while allowing an
appropriate level of development.
LU Policy 4.2: Encourage the use of Open Space Conservation Subdivision, Transfer of Develop-
ment Rights or low-impact development standards to protect and enhance natural resources.
LU Implementation Strategy 4.2.1: Establish a study committee to evaluate the use of
TDR for achieving agricultural preservation, natural resource protection, and life-cycle and
affordable housing goals. Report back to City Council with recommendations within one
year after the adoption of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. (See LU Policy 1.2)
LU Implementation Strategy 4.2.2: Adopt low-impact development performance
standards.
LU Goal 5: Recognize, protect and encourage agricultural production as a viable long-term land use.
LU Policy 5.1: Encourage a variety of agricultural operations, including small-scale metropolitan-
oriented agriculture, value-added production, and small-scale agricultural-related commercial uses.
LU Implementation Strategy 5.1.1: Create a new Agricultural Core zoning district where
agriculture is the predominant use, but allowing for secondary use when compatible with
agriculture, including low density residential, commercial recreation, and agricultural-related
commercial. Establish densities of 4 units per 40 acres. Within the 4 per 40 density limit,
a variety of lot sizes will be encouraged in the manner of the current lot averaging zoning:
lots of 2 to 5 acres in size or 20 acres or greater would be allowed. Bonus densities of up to
75% of the base density may be earned only if developers use the Open Space Conservation
Subdivision process and undertake actions such as permanent protection of agricultural land
or open space, or protection or enhancement of natural resources.
LU Implementation Strategy 5.1.2: Provide educational materials to current and prospec-
tive residents about quality-of-life issues such as noise and odors that can be expected in
proximity to agricultural operations.
Natural Resource Protection Area Goals and Policies
Agricultural Core Area Goals and Policies
Appendix E
General Rural Area Goal and Policies
Appendix ELocal Water Management PlanLocal Water Management Plan
247Scandia Comprehensive Plan46 47
LU Implementation Strategy 5.1.3: Investigate the feasibility of small-scale programs to
assist agricultural producers and promote Scandia as an agricultural-friendly community. For
example, programs matching farmers wishing to rent land for cultivation with landowners or
homeowners associations with available land, or programs offering seasonal tours of farms
and farm-related enterprises.
LU Policy 5.2: Encourage Transfer of Development Rights out of Agricultural Core areas as a
means of realizing a portion of the development value of land while keeping it in agricultural pro-
duction. (See LU Policy 1.2)
LU Implementation Strategy 5.2.1: Establish a study committee to evaluate the use of
TDR for achieving agricultural preservation, natural resource protection, and life-cycle and
affordable housing goals. Report back to City Council with recommendations within one
year after the adoption of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan.
LU Policy 5.3: When siting new structures, roads or drives, consider how best to preserve the vi-
ability of agricultural operations.
LU Implementation Strategy 5.3.1: Develop standards for Open Space Conservation
Subdivisions that are specifi c to agricultural protection.
LU Policy 5.4: Encourage participation in the Agricultural Preserves Program.
LU Implementation Strategy 5.4.1: Create an agricultural preserves overlay district to
encourage continued or expanded agricultural land uses in the agricultural core future land
use area and the general rural future land use area.
LU Implementation Strategy 5.4.2: Promote the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves
Program as a voluntary means for land owners in the agricultural core and general rural areas
to meet community character and stewardship goals. (See ED Implementation Strategy
4.3.2)
LU Goal 6: Provide for a wide range of land uses that are able to coexist within a rural setting, including
traditional and specialty agriculture, horse and hobby farms, limited raising of animals, market gardening, and
limited residential development and institutional use.
LU Policy 6.1: Allow a broader mix of compatible rural land uses than in the agricultural core land
use area.
LU Implementation Strategy 6.1.1: Create a new general rural zoning district that com-
bines both agricultural production and single-family residential uses, along with parks, com-
mercial recreation, and similar rural uses. Allow a density of 4 dwelling units per 40 acres
with a minimum allowed lot size of 2 acres (lot averaging is not required).
LU Implementation Strategy 6.1.2: Limit use of smaller lots for inappropriate activities
that have noise and other nuisance impacts on surrounding areas.
LU Policy 6.2: Require development to protect natural features.
LU Implementation Strategy 6.2.1: Develop standards for Open Space Conservation
Subdivisions that protect priority natural features in General Rural areas as identifi ed within
Scandia’s Natural Resource Protection Areas overlay. Bonus densities of up to 75% of the
LU Implementation Strategy 3.3.1: Provide pedestrian access to parks and trails and
community destinations.
LU Implementation Strategy 3.3.2: Consider conservation performance standards to
protect natural features in and near the village center.
LU Implementation Strategy 3.3.3: Consider landscaping standards for new development
along the public right-of-way.
LU Goal 4.1: Ensure that natural resources are taken into account prior to any land use decisions.
LU Policy 4.1: Establish minimum protection standards for priority natural resources.
LU Implementation Strategy 4.1.1: Create performance standards for priority natural
features identifi ed in Scandia’s Natural Resource priorities maps and component maps.
LU Goal 4.2: Protect natural resources through performance and site design standards while allowing an
appropriate level of development.
LU Policy 4.2: Encourage the use of Open Space Conservation Subdivision, Transfer of Develop-
ment Rights or low-impact development standards to protect and enhance natural resources.
LU Implementation Strategy 4.2.1: Establish a study committee to evaluate the use of
TDR for achieving agricultural preservation, natural resource protection, and life-cycle and
affordable housing goals. Report back to City Council with recommendations within one
year after the adoption of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. (See LU Policy 1.2)
LU Implementation Strategy 4.2.2: Adopt low-impact development performance
standards.
LU Goal 5: Recognize, protect and encourage agricultural production as a viable long-term land use.
LU Policy 5.1: Encourage a variety of agricultural operations, including small-scale metropolitan-
oriented agriculture, value-added production, and small-scale agricultural-related commercial uses.
LU Implementation Strategy 5.1.1: Create a new Agricultural Core zoning district where
agriculture is the predominant use, but allowing for secondary use when compatible with
agriculture, including low density residential, commercial recreation, and agricultural-related
commercial. Establish densities of 4 units per 40 acres. Within the 4 per 40 density limit,
a variety of lot sizes will be encouraged in the manner of the current lot averaging zoning:
lots of 2 to 5 acres in size or 20 acres or greater would be allowed. Bonus densities of up to
75% of the base density may be earned only if developers use the Open Space Conservation
Subdivision process and undertake actions such as permanent protection of agricultural land
or open space, or protection or enhancement of natural resources.
LU Implementation Strategy 5.1.2: Provide educational materials to current and prospec-
tive residents about quality-of-life issues such as noise and odors that can be expected in
proximity to agricultural operations.
Natural Resource Protection Area Goals and Policies
Agricultural Core Area Goals and Policies
Appendix E
General Rural Area Goal and Policies
Appendix ELocal Water Management PlanLocal Water Management Plan
248 Scandia Comprehensive Plan48 49
LU Implementation Strategy 8.3.1: Consider pro-active means of protecting sensitive
areas, including Purchase of Development Rights programs and participation in DNR and
watershed district shoreline restoration programs.
LU Implementation Strategy 8.3.2: Initiate programs to improve stormwater manage-
ment in shoreland areas.
LU Goal 9: Protect the resources of those lakeshore areas that remain in a relatively natural state, in agricul-
tural uses, or are developed with lots that meet current shoreland standards, while allowing limited develop-
ment where appropriate.
LU Policy 9.1: Require new development in lakeshore conservation areas to protect water quality,
natural resources on the site, and scenic qualities from the lake and surrounding areas.
LU Implementation Strategy 9.1.1: Create a new zoning district or overlay to restrict den-
sity and set design standards that protect natural resources and systems.
LU Implementation Strategy 9.1.2: Encourage Open Space Conservation Subdivisions
that use low-impact development techniques to protect and enhance high quality natural
areas identifi ed on Scandia’s Natural Resource Protection Areas overlay.
LU Policy 9.2: Encourage the protection and enhancement of shoreland natural areas as a means
of improving lake water quality.
LU Implementation Strategy 9.2.1: Consider creating or participating in an existing Pur-
chase of Development Rights program to permanently protect undeveloped sensitive natural
areas in shoreland areas.
LU Implementation Strategy 9.2.2: Consider restoration requirements for degraded natu-
ral areas in the zoning district or overlay development standards.
LU Goal 10: Protect the natural and scenic resources of the St. Croix River Corridor, both within and
adjacent to the St. Croix National Scenic Riverway, while allowing traditional residential and recreational use
patterns to continue.
LU Policy 10.1: Continue to apply Washington County development standards that limit the density,
location and appearance of new development, until adoption of standards by City.
LU Implementation Strategy 10.1.1: Revise the St. Croix River ordinance to be specifi c to
the City’s needs and interests, including protection of scenic views of the river and encour-
agement of visual or physical access in appropriate locations.
LU Policy 10.2: Work with river corridor residents, the National Park Service and scenic river inter-
est groups to increase City-wide awareness and stewardship of the area’s resources.
LU Implementation Strategy 10.2.1: Follow the recommendations of the Parks, Trails,
Recreation and Open Space Plan to improve access, increase visibility, and improve
stewardship.
LU Goal 7: Within a 4 dwelling units per 40 acre density limit encourage a mix of lot sizes with a minimum
lot size of 2 acres.
LU Policy 7.1: Allow for limited infi ll of large lot residential areas.
LU Implementation Strategy 7.1.1: Consider the General Rural land use area as a receiv-
ing area for a Transfer of Development Rights program. (See LU Policy 1.2)
LU Policy 7.2: Encourage connection of existing higher density (5 acre lot) neighborhoods via
streets and trails to nearby neighborhoods, parks, and other community destinations.
LU Implementation Strategy 7.2.1: Require non-motorized travel connections in new
development to other neighborhoods, parks, or schools.
LU Goal 8: Maintain the established pattern of small-lot residential development in lakeshore areas while
improving stormwater management and land stewardship practices.
LU Policy 8.1: Apply shoreland management standards that allow the continuation of established
development patterns without extending those patterns into undeveloped areas.
LU Implementation Strategy 8.1.1: Create a new zoning overlay or district allowing tradi-
tional density and form of lakeshore development.
LU Policy 8.2: Avoid any increase in runoff or other potential adverse impacts on water quality.
LU Implementation Strategy 8.2.1: Require new development or redevelopment to use
low-impact development techniques.
LU Implementation Strategy 8.2.2: Create incentives for owners of existing developed
shoreland to create buffers and rain gardens.
LU Implementation Strategy 8.2.3: Encourage local nurseries to work with the Washing-
ton Conservation District to offer classes on buffers and rain gardens.
LU Policy 8.3: Encourage the protection and enhancement of shoreland vegetation as a means of
improving lake water quality.
Lakeshore Traditional Area Goal and Policies
Appendix E
Lakeshore Conservation Area Goal and Policies
St. Croix River Corridor Goal and Policies
Appendix E
base density may be earned only if developers use the Open Space Conservation Subdivision
process and undertake actions such as protection or enhancement of natural resources, or
permanent protection of agricultural land or open space.
LU Implementation Strategy 6.2.2: When siting new buildings or drives, encourage
and incorporate protection or screening of scenic views from roads into design standards.
Use the City’s inventory of scenic resources for regulatory purposes, design review, and to
educate residents and landowners about the quality of these resources. Work with landown-
ers prior to development to develop site-by-site strategies for protecting scenic resources.
Require landscaping or screening requirements along major roadways encouraging the use of
native vegetation.
Local Water Management PlanLocal Water Management Plan
249Scandia Comprehensive Plan48 49
LU Implementation Strategy 8.3.1: Consider pro-active means of protecting sensitive
areas, including Purchase of Development Rights programs and participation in DNR and
watershed district shoreline restoration programs.
LU Implementation Strategy 8.3.2: Initiate programs to improve stormwater manage-
ment in shoreland areas.
LU Goal 9: Protect the resources of those lakeshore areas that remain in a relatively natural state, in agricul-
tural uses, or are developed with lots that meet current shoreland standards, while allowing limited develop-
ment where appropriate.
LU Policy 9.1: Require new development in lakeshore conservation areas to protect water quality,
natural resources on the site, and scenic qualities from the lake and surrounding areas.
LU Implementation Strategy 9.1.1: Create a new zoning district or overlay to restrict den-
sity and set design standards that protect natural resources and systems.
LU Implementation Strategy 9.1.2: Encourage Open Space Conservation Subdivisions
that use low-impact development techniques to protect and enhance high quality natural
areas identifi ed on Scandia’s Natural Resource Protection Areas overlay.
LU Policy 9.2: Encourage the protection and enhancement of shoreland natural areas as a means
of improving lake water quality.
LU Implementation Strategy 9.2.1: Consider creating or participating in an existing Pur-
chase of Development Rights program to permanently protect undeveloped sensitive natural
areas in shoreland areas.
LU Implementation Strategy 9.2.2: Consider restoration requirements for degraded natu-
ral areas in the zoning district or overlay development standards.
LU Goal 10: Protect the natural and scenic resources of the St. Croix River Corridor, both within and
adjacent to the St. Croix National Scenic Riverway, while allowing traditional residential and recreational use
patterns to continue.
LU Policy 10.1: Continue to apply Washington County development standards that limit the density,
location and appearance of new development, until adoption of standards by City.
LU Implementation Strategy 10.1.1: Revise the St. Croix River ordinance to be specifi c to
the City’s needs and interests, including protection of scenic views of the river and encour-
agement of visual or physical access in appropriate locations.
LU Policy 10.2: Work with river corridor residents, the National Park Service and scenic river inter-
est groups to increase City-wide awareness and stewardship of the area’s resources.
LU Implementation Strategy 10.2.1: Follow the recommendations of the Parks, Trails,
Recreation and Open Space Plan to improve access, increase visibility, and improve
stewardship.
LU Goal 7: Within a 4 dwelling units per 40 acre density limit encourage a mix of lot sizes with a minimum
lot size of 2 acres.
LU Policy 7.1: Allow for limited infi ll of large lot residential areas.
LU Implementation Strategy 7.1.1: Consider the General Rural land use area as a receiv-
ing area for a Transfer of Development Rights program. (See LU Policy 1.2)
LU Policy 7.2: Encourage connection of existing higher density (5 acre lot) neighborhoods via
streets and trails to nearby neighborhoods, parks, and other community destinations.
LU Implementation Strategy 7.2.1: Require non-motorized travel connections in new
development to other neighborhoods, parks, or schools.
LU Goal 8: Maintain the established pattern of small-lot residential development in lakeshore areas while
improving stormwater management and land stewardship practices.
LU Policy 8.1: Apply shoreland management standards that allow the continuation of established
development patterns without extending those patterns into undeveloped areas.
LU Implementation Strategy 8.1.1: Create a new zoning overlay or district allowing tradi-
tional density and form of lakeshore development.
LU Policy 8.2: Avoid any increase in runoff or other potential adverse impacts on water quality.
LU Implementation Strategy 8.2.1: Require new development or redevelopment to use
low-impact development techniques.
LU Implementation Strategy 8.2.2: Create incentives for owners of existing developed
shoreland to create buffers and rain gardens.
LU Implementation Strategy 8.2.3: Encourage local nurseries to work with the Washing-
ton Conservation District to offer classes on buffers and rain gardens.
LU Policy 8.3: Encourage the protection and enhancement of shoreland vegetation as a means of
improving lake water quality.
Lakeshore Traditional Area Goal and Policies
Appendix E
Lakeshore Conservation Area Goal and Policies
St. Croix River Corridor Goal and Policies
Appendix E
base density may be earned only if developers use the Open Space Conservation Subdivision
process and undertake actions such as protection or enhancement of natural resources, or
permanent protection of agricultural land or open space.
LU Implementation Strategy 6.2.2: When siting new buildings or drives, encourage
and incorporate protection or screening of scenic views from roads into design standards.
Use the City’s inventory of scenic resources for regulatory purposes, design review, and to
educate residents and landowners about the quality of these resources. Work with landown-
ers prior to development to develop site-by-site strategies for protecting scenic resources.
Require landscaping or screening requirements along major roadways encouraging the use of
native vegetation.
Local Water Management PlanLocal Water Management Plan
250 Scandia Comprehensive Plan50 51
LU Implementation Strategy 12.1.3: Establish partnerships with county, state, and federal
agencies and private land protection organizations for the management, protection and en-
hancement of protected recreation areas.
LU Policy 12.2: Encourage compatible management and protection of resources on privately-
owned lands adjacent to recreation areas.
LU Implementation Strategy 12.2.1: Consider purchasing conservation easements from
willing landowners to meet management goals.
LU Implementation Strategy 12.2.2: Create development standards that require a buffer
for new development that is adjacent to recreation areas.
LU Goal 13: Allow for the safe and orderly extraction of aggregate resources now and in the future while
protecting sensitive resources on or near those properties and providing for transitions to other uses when
resource extraction is complete. Mining is limited to existing locations.
LU Policy 13.1: Implement performance standards for the management of existing mining opera-
tions in order to minimize or prevent negative impacts to resources and nearby land uses.
LU Implementation Strategy 13.1.1: The City will continue to implement its Aggregate
Resource Ordinance, which governs the relationship between mining operations and existing
and proposed developments.
LU Policy 13.2: Prior to granting approvals, require reclamation plans for all extraction sites that
require restoration to pre-extraction natural vegetation.
LU Implementation Strategy 13.2.1: The City will continue to implement ordinance pro-
visions requiring extraction sites to have a reclamation plan indicating how mined lands will
be restored to a safe, attractive, and usable condition with native vegetation after the extrac-
tive use has ended.
LU Policy 13.3: Manage proposed development that may confl ict with active aggregate extraction.
LU Implementation Strategy 13.3.1: The City will continue to use its Aggregate Resource
Ordinance to govern the relationship between mining operations and existing and proposed
developments.
LU Goal 14: Protect scenic rural roads, viewpoints and vistas identifi ed through the planning process from
visually intrusive or incompatible development.
LU Policy 14.1: Establish context-sensitive roadway design standards that will protect the narrow
and heavily wooded character of identifi ed low-traffi c roadways.
LU Implementation Strategy 14.1.1: Modify street standards to maintain the visual quali-
ties of identifi ed scenic roads, including allowing a narrower right-of-way and protection of
vegetation within that right-of-way.
Rural Commercial Areas Goals and Policies
Appendix E
Mining – Resource Extraction Goal and Policies
Protected Recreation Area Goal and Policies
Appendix E
LU Policy 10.3: Improve visual access to the river corridor where potential overlooks or viewpoints
exist, while avoiding damage to sensitive resources.
LU Implementation Strategy 10.3.1: Continue developing the City’s inventory of scenic
resources – scenic roads and viewshed – using GIS methodology and the Visual Quality
Analysis procedure. Use this information in regulatory standards and design review, and to
educate residents and landowners about the quality of these resources. (See LU Implemen-
tation Strategies 1.3.1 and 14.2.1)
LU Policy 10.4: Improve physical access to the river corridor where public lands may provide access
opportunities (see also Parks and Trails policies).
LU Goal 11: Recognize the value of the City’s historic rural commercial areas and crossroads stores.
LU Policy 11.1: Allow for the continuation and expansion of rural commercial areas with new
small-scale commercial uses.
LU Implementation Strategy 11.1.1: Create a new zoning district for the Rural Commer-
cial Nodes shown on the Future Land Use Map that would encourage businesses that serve
visitors and users of the City’s recreational assets. Establish a 2-acre minimum lot size for
commercial development and residential densities consistent with on-site septic systems.
LU Policy 11.2: Encourage additional commercial and service businesses where commercial uses
existed historically and continue to be maintained, but not in other areas of the City.
LU Implementation Strategy 11.2.1: Establish design standards to ensure that new com-
mercial buildings refl ect the historic character of their surroundings in their size, massing,
setbacks and other attributes.
LU Policy 11.3: Manage parking and pedestrian circulation in historic hamlets to calm traffi c and
encourage walking and biking.
LU Implementation Strategy 11.3.1: Improve pedestrian crossings, consider installation
of sidewalks and walkways in defi ned areas, and work with businesses to improve signage for
parking areas, paths and trails.
LU Goal 12: Recognize and enhance publicly-owned lands and other lands permanently protected from
development and improve public access to such lands where appropriate.
LU Policy 12.1: Establish standards or guidelines for the protection of scenic and natural resources
within and adjacent to protected recreation areas, and for public access to recreation areas.
LU Implementation Strategy 12.1.1: Consider participating in an existing Purchase of
Development Rights program or creating a new program to permanently protect high prior-
ity sites on the Natural Resources Overlay or those identifi ed as park search areas.
LU Implementation Strategy 12.1.2: Use Park Dedication requirements to protect scenic
or natural resources.
Scenic Roads Goal and Policies
Local Water Management PlanLocal Water Management Plan
251Scandia Comprehensive Plan50 51
LU Implementation Strategy 12.1.3: Establish partnerships with county, state, and federal
agencies and private land protection organizations for the management, protection and en-
hancement of protected recreation areas.
LU Policy 12.2: Encourage compatible management and protection of resources on privately-
owned lands adjacent to recreation areas.
LU Implementation Strategy 12.2.1: Consider purchasing conservation easements from
willing landowners to meet management goals.
LU Implementation Strategy 12.2.2: Create development standards that require a buffer
for new development that is adjacent to recreation areas.
LU Goal 13: Allow for the safe and orderly extraction of aggregate resources now and in the future while
protecting sensitive resources on or near those properties and providing for transitions to other uses when
resource extraction is complete. Mining is limited to existing locations.
LU Policy 13.1: Implement performance standards for the management of existing mining opera-
tions in order to minimize or prevent negative impacts to resources and nearby land uses.
LU Implementation Strategy 13.1.1: The City will continue to implement its Aggregate
Resource Ordinance, which governs the relationship between mining operations and existing
and proposed developments.
LU Policy 13.2: Prior to granting approvals, require reclamation plans for all extraction sites that
require restoration to pre-extraction natural vegetation.
LU Implementation Strategy 13.2.1: The City will continue to implement ordinance pro-
visions requiring extraction sites to have a reclamation plan indicating how mined lands will
be restored to a safe, attractive, and usable condition with native vegetation after the extrac-
tive use has ended.
LU Policy 13.3: Manage proposed development that may confl ict with active aggregate extraction.
LU Implementation Strategy 13.3.1: The City will continue to use its Aggregate Resource
Ordinance to govern the relationship between mining operations and existing and proposed
developments.
LU Goal 14: Protect scenic rural roads, viewpoints and vistas identifi ed through the planning process from
visually intrusive or incompatible development.
LU Policy 14.1: Establish context-sensitive roadway design standards that will protect the narrow
and heavily wooded character of identifi ed low-traffi c roadways.
LU Implementation Strategy 14.1.1: Modify street standards to maintain the visual quali-
ties of identifi ed scenic roads, including allowing a narrower right-of-way and protection of
vegetation within that right-of-way.
Rural Commercial Areas Goals and Policies
Appendix E
Mining – Resource Extraction Goal and Policies
Protected Recreation Area Goal and Policies
Appendix E
LU Policy 10.3: Improve visual access to the river corridor where potential overlooks or viewpoints
exist, while avoiding damage to sensitive resources.
LU Implementation Strategy 10.3.1: Continue developing the City’s inventory of scenic
resources – scenic roads and viewshed – using GIS methodology and the Visual Quality
Analysis procedure. Use this information in regulatory standards and design review, and to
educate residents and landowners about the quality of these resources. (See LU Implemen-
tation Strategies 1.3.1 and 14.2.1)
LU Policy 10.4: Improve physical access to the river corridor where public lands may provide access
opportunities (see also Parks and Trails policies).
LU Goal 11: Recognize the value of the City’s historic rural commercial areas and crossroads stores.
LU Policy 11.1: Allow for the continuation and expansion of rural commercial areas with new
small-scale commercial uses.
LU Implementation Strategy 11.1.1: Create a new zoning district for the Rural Commer-
cial Nodes shown on the Future Land Use Map that would encourage businesses that serve
visitors and users of the City’s recreational assets. Establish a 2-acre minimum lot size for
commercial development and residential densities consistent with on-site septic systems.
LU Policy 11.2: Encourage additional commercial and service businesses where commercial uses
existed historically and continue to be maintained, but not in other areas of the City.
LU Implementation Strategy 11.2.1: Establish design standards to ensure that new com-
mercial buildings refl ect the historic character of their surroundings in their size, massing,
setbacks and other attributes.
LU Policy 11.3: Manage parking and pedestrian circulation in historic hamlets to calm traffi c and
encourage walking and biking.
LU Implementation Strategy 11.3.1: Improve pedestrian crossings, consider installation
of sidewalks and walkways in defi ned areas, and work with businesses to improve signage for
parking areas, paths and trails.
LU Goal 12: Recognize and enhance publicly-owned lands and other lands permanently protected from
development and improve public access to such lands where appropriate.
LU Policy 12.1: Establish standards or guidelines for the protection of scenic and natural resources
within and adjacent to protected recreation areas, and for public access to recreation areas.
LU Implementation Strategy 12.1.1: Consider participating in an existing Purchase of
Development Rights program or creating a new program to permanently protect high prior-
ity sites on the Natural Resources Overlay or those identifi ed as park search areas.
LU Implementation Strategy 12.1.2: Use Park Dedication requirements to protect scenic
or natural resources.
Scenic Roads Goal and Policies
Local Water Management PlanLocal Water Management Plan
252 Scandia Comprehensive Plan52 53
Appendix E Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Financial Considerations
Implementation of the Scandia Local Water Management Plan will require investment of
staff or monetary resources for the activities listed below. The implementation plan in
Appendix B of the Scandia Comprehensive Plan gives a general schedule for implement-
ing LWMP strategies over the next 10 years. The City’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
will also specify capital investment projects that are directed by the LWMP. The CIP is not
complete at this time. When complete, the CIP will include project details, estimated costs,
and timelines.
General implementation activities requiring staff of monetary resources (see individual
goals, policies, and strategies for specifi c implementation activities):
• Update of the zoning, subdivision, and land development ordinances to come into con-
formance with goals, policies, and strategies of this Plan, including:
o Standards for alternative wastewater treatment systems
o Individual septic treatment system regulations
o Low-impact development standards
o Stormwater and erosion and sediment control standards conforming to watershed
district standards and MPCA standards
o Standards for protection of natural resources including lakes, streams, wetlands,
fl oodplains, native vegetation, and groundwater
o Creation of a natural resource overlay district to protect identifi ed important natural
resources throughout the City
o Encourage the use of open space conservation subdivision
• Participate in Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies and required TMDL imple-
mentation activities for MPCA listed impaired waters
• Continue to enforce current ordinances (and new ordinances as they are updated) and
review development permits for stormwater, surface water, groundwater, fl ooding, and
wetland impacts
• Continue operation and maintenance of existing community wastewater and water
systems
• Work cooperatively with Washington Conservation District, watershed districts, and
local nurseries to promote stormwater pollution prevention and educate citizens and
businesses about stormwater, impaired waters, and water conservation
• Create an inventory of stormwater facilities
• Incorporate water quality best management practices on City owned properties
LU Policy 14.2: Establish viewshed protection overlay standards that will maintain the scenic quality
of signifi cant views throughout the City.
LU Implementation Strategy 14.2.1: Continue developing the City’s inventory of scenic
resources – scenic roads and viewsheds – using GIS methodology and the Visual Quality
Analysis procedure.
LU Policy 14.3: Work with landowners to establish desirable development patterns that will protect
important viewsheds, through appropriate siting of buildings and roads and screening with native
vegetation and landforms.
LU Implementation Strategy 14.3.1: Consider creating a scenic overlay district that modi-
fi es setback, screening and landscaping, and building placement for new development to
ensure that community character is maintained.
Local Water Management Plan
253Scandia Comprehensive Plan52 53
Appendix E Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Financial Considerations
Implementation of the Scandia Local Water Management Plan will require investment of
staff or monetary resources for the activities listed below. The implementation plan in
Appendix B of the Scandia Comprehensive Plan gives a general schedule for implement-
ing LWMP strategies over the next 10 years. The City’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
will also specify capital investment projects that are directed by the LWMP. The CIP is not
complete at this time. When complete, the CIP will include project details, estimated costs,
and timelines.
General implementation activities requiring staff of monetary resources (see individual
goals, policies, and strategies for specifi c implementation activities):
• Update of the zoning, subdivision, and land development ordinances to come into con-
formance with goals, policies, and strategies of this Plan, including:
o Standards for alternative wastewater treatment systems
o Individual septic treatment system regulations
o Low-impact development standards
o Stormwater and erosion and sediment control standards conforming to watershed
district standards and MPCA standards
o Standards for protection of natural resources including lakes, streams, wetlands,
fl oodplains, native vegetation, and groundwater
o Creation of a natural resource overlay district to protect identifi ed important natural
resources throughout the City
o Encourage the use of open space conservation subdivision
• Participate in Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies and required TMDL imple-
mentation activities for MPCA listed impaired waters
• Continue to enforce current ordinances (and new ordinances as they are updated) and
review development permits for stormwater, surface water, groundwater, fl ooding, and
wetland impacts
• Continue operation and maintenance of existing community wastewater and water
systems
• Work cooperatively with Washington Conservation District, watershed districts, and
local nurseries to promote stormwater pollution prevention and educate citizens and
businesses about stormwater, impaired waters, and water conservation
• Create an inventory of stormwater facilities
• Incorporate water quality best management practices on City owned properties
LU Policy 14.2: Establish viewshed protection overlay standards that will maintain the scenic quality
of signifi cant views throughout the City.
LU Implementation Strategy 14.2.1: Continue developing the City’s inventory of scenic
resources – scenic roads and viewsheds – using GIS methodology and the Visual Quality
Analysis procedure.
LU Policy 14.3: Work with landowners to establish desirable development patterns that will protect
important viewsheds, through appropriate siting of buildings and roads and screening with native
vegetation and landforms.
LU Implementation Strategy 14.3.1: Consider creating a scenic overlay district that modi-
fi es setback, screening and landscaping, and building placement for new development to
ensure that community character is maintained.
Local Water Management Plan
254 Scandia Comprehensive Plan54
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Current Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinances
The current Scandia Subdivision Ordinance contains basic provisions for stormwater man-
agement and erosion and sediment control, particularly sections 8.1, 11.3, 11.4 and 12.2.7.
These sections have been excerpted from the Subdivision Ordinance and are included on the
following pagers. This Land and Water Management Plan contains many implementation
strategies directing updating of stormwater management and erosion and sediment control
provisions. These strategies will be accomplished when the Scandia subdivision ordinance
is updated immediately following adoption of the Comprehensive Plan and Land and Water
Management Plan.
This Local Surface Water Management Plan is incorporated into the City’s 2008 Comprehen-
sive Plan update and will be applicable until 2018 when the City will be required to update
the plan. Prior to 2018, periodic amendments may be required to incorporate changes in
local policies as well as changes to the Watershed Management Plans of the watersheds with
jurisdiction in the City. Plan amendments will be incorporated by following the review and
adoption steps outlined below:
The City shall prepare proposed amendments to the plan and give notice of the pro-
posed plan amendments. Notice of public hearing on proposed plan amendments and
a description of the amendments shall be published by the City in at least one legal
newspaper within the City. Publication shall occur at least ten days before the hearing.
Notice shall also be mailed at least 30 days before the hearing to the Metropolitan
Council and watershed management organizations having jurisdiction within the city.
At the hearing, the City shall solicit comments on the proposed plan amendments.
After consideration but before adoption by the City, the City shall submit amend-
ments to its water management plan to the watershed management organizations
having jurisdiction within the city for review for consistency with the watershed plan.
The City shall also submit amendments to the plan to Washington County for review
for consistency with the Washington County Groundwater Plan. The organizations
shall have 60 days to complete their review and approve or disapprove the local
plan or parts of the plan. If the organizations fail to complete their review within the
prescribed period, the local plan shall be deemed approved unless an extension is
granted by the City.
Concurrently with the City’s submission of local water management plan amendments
to the watershed management organization, the City shall submit amendments to its
water management plan to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment. The
council shall have 45 days to review and comment upon the local plan. The council’s
45-day review period shall run concurrently with the 60-day review period by the
watershed management organizations. The Metropolitan Council shall submit its
comments to the watershed management organizations and shall send a copy of its
comments to the City.
After approval of amendments to the local plan by the watershed management
organizations, the City shall adopt and implement its plan within 120 days, and shall
amend its offi cial controls accordingly within 180 days.
Amendment Procedures
255Scandia Comprehensive Plan54
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
Current Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinances
The current Scandia Subdivision Ordinance contains basic provisions for stormwater man-
agement and erosion and sediment control, particularly sections 8.1, 11.3, 11.4 and 12.2.7.
These sections have been excerpted from the Subdivision Ordinance and are included on the
following pagers. This Land and Water Management Plan contains many implementation
strategies directing updating of stormwater management and erosion and sediment control
provisions. These strategies will be accomplished when the Scandia subdivision ordinance
is updated immediately following adoption of the Comprehensive Plan and Land and Water
Management Plan.
This Local Surface Water Management Plan is incorporated into the City’s 2008 Comprehen-
sive Plan update and will be applicable until 2018 when the City will be required to update
the plan. Prior to 2018, periodic amendments may be required to incorporate changes in
local policies as well as changes to the Watershed Management Plans of the watersheds with
jurisdiction in the City. Plan amendments will be incorporated by following the review and
adoption steps outlined below:
The City shall prepare proposed amendments to the plan and give notice of the pro-
posed plan amendments. Notice of public hearing on proposed plan amendments and
a description of the amendments shall be published by the City in at least one legal
newspaper within the City. Publication shall occur at least ten days before the hearing.
Notice shall also be mailed at least 30 days before the hearing to the Metropolitan
Council and watershed management organizations having jurisdiction within the city.
At the hearing, the City shall solicit comments on the proposed plan amendments.
After consideration but before adoption by the City, the City shall submit amend-
ments to its water management plan to the watershed management organizations
having jurisdiction within the city for review for consistency with the watershed plan.
The City shall also submit amendments to the plan to Washington County for review
for consistency with the Washington County Groundwater Plan. The organizations
shall have 60 days to complete their review and approve or disapprove the local
plan or parts of the plan. If the organizations fail to complete their review within the
prescribed period, the local plan shall be deemed approved unless an extension is
granted by the City.
Concurrently with the City’s submission of local water management plan amendments
to the watershed management organization, the City shall submit amendments to its
water management plan to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment. The
council shall have 45 days to review and comment upon the local plan. The council’s
45-day review period shall run concurrently with the 60-day review period by the
watershed management organizations. The Metropolitan Council shall submit its
comments to the watershed management organizations and shall send a copy of its
comments to the City.
After approval of amendments to the local plan by the watershed management
organizations, the City shall adopt and implement its plan within 120 days, and shall
amend its offi cial controls accordingly within 180 days.
Amendment Procedures
256 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
257Scandia Comprehensive Plan
258 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
259Scandia Comprehensive Plan
260 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
261Scandia Comprehensive Plan
262 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
263Scandia Comprehensive Plan
264 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix ELocal Water Management Plan
265Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix FCapital Improvement Program 2009-2013
Approved by City Council
Dec. 16th 2008
266 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix FCapital Improvement Program 2009-2013
Introduction
Table of Contents
What is a CIP and Why Have One?...................................................................................... 267
Scope of the Draft CIP........................................................................................................... 267
Funding Sources....................................................................................................................... 268
Street Maintenance Program.................................................................................................. 268
Equipment Replacement Fund.............................................................................................. 269
Project Priorities....................................................................................................................... 270
Project Highlights by Department........................................................................................ 271
Projects by Year, 2009 thru 2013........................................................................................... 273
Projects & Funding Sources by Department, 2009 thru 2013.......................................... 275
Projects by Funding Source, 2009 thru 2013....................................................................... 277
Projects & Funding Sources by Department, 2014 thru 2018.......................................... 279
Projects & Funding Sources by Department, 2019 thru 2023.......................................... 280
Projects & Funding Sources by Department, 2024 thru 2028.......................................... 281
Pending Projects....................................................................................................................... 282
All Equipment Replacements, 2009 thru 2028.................................................................... 283
Replacements by Department, 2009 thru 2018................................................................... 284
Comparison of Funding Levels & Year End Balances, 2009 thru 2018......................... 285
CIP Overview
CIP Summary Data
Equipment Replacement
267Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix FCapital Improvement Program 2009-2013
268 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix FCapital Improvement Program 2009-2013
269Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix FCapital Improvement Program 2009-2013
270 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix FCapital Improvement Program 2009-2013
271Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix FCapital Improvement Program 2009-2013
272 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix FCapital Improvement Program 2009-2013
273Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix FCapital Improvement Program 2009-2013
274 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix FCapital Improvement Program 2009-2013
275Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix FCapital Improvement Program 2009-2013
276 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix FCapital Improvement Program 2009-2013
277Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix FCapital Improvement Program 2009-2013
278 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix FCapital Improvement Program 2009-2013
279Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix FCapital Improvement Program 2014-2018
280 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix FCapital Improvement Program 2019-2023
281Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix FCapital Improvement Program 2024-2028
282 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix FCapital Improvement Program 2009-2013
283Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix FCapital Improvement Program 2009-2013
284 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix FCapital Improvement Program 2009-2013
285Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix FCapital Improvement Program 2009-2013
286 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix FCapital Improvement Program 2009-2013
287Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix G2008 Zoning
288 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix G2008 Zoning
New Scandia Townshiop Development Code
Chapter 2 - Zoning Regulations
Effective 6/1/99
(Revised January 25, 2007)
289Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix G2008 Zoning
290 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix G2008 Zoning
291Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix G2008 Zoning
292 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix G2008 Zoning
293Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix G2008 Zoning
294 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix G2008 Zoning
295Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix G2008 Zoning
296 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix G2008 Zoning
297Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix G2008 Zoning
298 Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix G2008 Zoning
299Scandia Comprehensive Plan
Appendix HInventory of Historic Sites
Scandia, Minnesota
Properties on the National Register of Historic Places
January, 2009
Copas, John, House
•Frame residence (ca. 1880) built on site of 1857 homestead of early settler,
merchant, and farmer.
•Location: Minnesota Highway 95
•Current use: Single Family Dwelling
Erickson, Johannes, House
•Log dwelling with gambrel roof built in 1868 by Swedish immigrant
Erickson.
•Location: County Road 3 & 209th St. N.
•Current use: Gammelgarden Musuem
•
Hay Lake School
•Brick school with bell tower built in 1895 by Scandia residents.
•Location: County Road 3 & Old Marine Trail
•Current Use: Museum, Washington County Historical Society
Source: Minnesota Historical Society