Loading...
09.d1 DNR Recreation Grant - Playground_final 2022 Grant Application Outdoor Recreation Grant Program Submission Deadline: March 31, 2022 Before completing this application, please read the 2022 Outdoor Recreation Program Manual for more program information. Only one park may be included in an application and only one application per park. Applicants are eligible to submit more than one application and receive more than one grant. Significant progress must be completed on active projects before an additional proposal can be submitted. This program is very competitive. Staff members are available to discuss your project or review application materials prior to submission. You are encouraged to submit any draft application or materials by March 10th if you would like staff to provide comments. Be sure to allow enough time to complete the applicant resolution, public participation, and any appraisals (if your project includes land acquisition). Only complete applications submitted by the deadline will be considered. Applications are to be submitted electronically in a “.pdf” format by March 31. Please format the entire application, including all attachments, as one pdf. Use the form provided for each item or reproduce it in the same format. Use Item 1 – Application Summary as your cover sheet. To submit the application, email a pdf version of it to Parkgrants.DNR@state.mn.us. Paper submission of applications will no longer be accepted unless arranged in advance of the due date with staff. After submission, make sure you receive a confirmation email that your application arrived in a useable form by the due date. Applications submitted in an unusable format will not be considered for funding. Timeline: 2022 Grant Round • Application materials become available .................December 2021 • Submission deadline ...............................................March 31, 2022 • Awards announced .................................................July 2022 • Agreements are signed – project may begin ..........October – November 2022 • Grants expire – projects must be completed .........June 30, 2024 For assistance, please contact • Mai Neng Moua, 651-259-5638, mai.n.moua@state.mn.us • Audrey Mularie, 651-259-5549, audrey.mularie@state.mn.us • Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Information Center, 1-888-646-6367 Rev. Aug 10, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Required for all projects: Item 1: ...... Application Summary Item 2: ...... Project Narrative Item 3: ...... Project Relation to SCORP Item 4: ...... Cost Breakdown Item 5: ...... Project Site Evaluation Item 6: ...... Public Participation and Benefit Item 7: ...... Availability for Public Use Item 8: ...... Statement of Accessibility Item 9: ...... Projected Operation and Maintenance Costs Attachments: Required for all Projects: Attachment A: Applicant Resolution Attachment B: Location Map Attachment C: Recreational Site Plan Attachment D: Photos Required if applicable to your project: Attachment E: Plans Attachment F: Appraisal(s) – Required for all land acquisition projects Rev. Aug 10, 2011 ITEM 1 - APPLICATION SUMMARY –2022 APPLICATION Applicant Information Name of applicant: City of Scandia, Minnesota Name and title of contact: Charles Fischer – Director of Public Works Address: 14727 209th St. N City: Scandia State: MN Zip Code: 55073 Phone: 651-325-5218 Email: c.fischer@ci.scandia.mn.us Park Information Park Name: Community Center Park Park Address: 14727 209th St N City: Scandia Nine Digit Zip Code: 55073-8503 County: Washington Existing Park Acres: 15.09 Acres Project Information Project Type (Check all that apply to this project): ☐ Acquisition: Acres to be purchased: Not Applicable ☐ New Development/Construction ☐ Redevelopment/ Rehabilitation ☒ Replacement/ Demolition Description: Provide a short description (less than 30 words) of your project proposal. Include only items that will be accomplished with this project . Do not include work to be accomplished in future phases. The City of Scandia will be replacing a 30-year-old playground structure, swing set and upgrading the surfacing to allow ADA accessibility within and around the playground. Financial Information The Applicant must provide a non-state match of, at least, 50% of the total cost. This match may consist of cash or the value of materials, labor and equipment usage by the applicant or donations or any combination of these. Applicants that provide, at least, 20% of the match from their own resources will receive additional consideration in the review criteria. The total cost shown below must equal the total costs shown in Item 4 – Cost Breakdown. Total Project Cost: $225,000 Grant Request: $112,500 Match Amount: $112,500 Match Description: List all sources and amounts of the match. Identify if it is committed or pending. Projects that have the all match committed by the application deadline will receive additional consideration in the review criteria. The City of Scandia has accepted to source the matching fund balance through the approved use of $98,000 in Park Capital Improvement funds and $4,500 of In-Kind Staff Hours by the City Council. The matching funds also include generous donation of $10,000 from the Scandia Rev. Aug 10, 2011 Marine Lions Club. The Public Works Department will be involved in the demolitio n, grading and landscaping required during the construction of the new playground and ADA sidewalk. The staff hours assigned to these tasks will be used as In-Kind match increasing the matching funds to total $112,500. The City has also inquired with local businesses and organizations for donations to assist in the completion of the project and add potential accessory amenities such as shade structure(s), additional benches and picnic tables, or other amenities relating to this project deemed useful for the community. The requested donations from local businesses or organizations gathered following this application will be totaled and recommended for specific uses by the Parks and Recreation Committee to the City Council. The City of Scandia including the Scandia Marine Lions Club are fully prepared and committed to the $112,500 matching investment. ITEM 2 - PROJECT NARRATIVE Please limit your narrative to one page. 1. Provide a general overview of what the project involves and what will be accomplished by the completion of the project. You may discuss why this project is needed at this time. Identify the new facilities that will be constructed, the existing facilities that will be renovated or replaced, or the general site improvements. Over the past two years more and more park users have been returning to our outdoor facilities in search of ways to enjoy their time outdoors. The recent world events have proven that updated facilities are needed to accommodate the upswing in usage of outdoor recreational facilities. With the planned and approved upgrades to our playground, our goal is to produce a more invitin g and accessible space for our residents and visitors to enjoy. The current playground is close to 30 years old and does not meet the needs of our community due to the limited accessibility and the aging structures which do not provide adequate play space. The City of Scandia has planned and approved to remove the old playground equipment and replace with new accessible play structures and equipment. Along with the new accessible equipment a pour-in-place rubber surface trail and pad within the playground will help accommodate users of all abilities. Following the installation of the rubber surfacing , blown-in engineered wood fiber will fill in the remaining area within the playground for safe and accessible play. Also, a new concrete ADA compliant sidewalk will be installed to serve the playground from the adjacent parking lot where handicap accessible parking will be added within existing parking stalls . Other site improvements will include the replacement and addition of benches and tables with ADA accessible park benches and tables. The cement pads that the benches and tables will be placed on will be connected to the new sidewalk and rubberized surface for zero entry from one surface to the other. 2. What design elements are included that contribute to preserving environmental resources as part of ensuring a quality outdoor recreation experience for present and future generations? The Carnelian-Marine-St. Croix Watershed District has committed to helping develop a rain garden basin to capture water runof f from the adjacent tennis court and drain tile water from the playground. The nearby wetland will be protected from the run -off Rev. Aug 10, 2011 through this system. The rain garden will be positioned between the playground and the pond buffer located east of the playgrou nd as indicated in the Recreational Site Plan. Planting selections will incorporate pollinator friendly material and match existing foraged plants by local and migratory animal and insect species. The design of the new playground is directly placed over the existing playground location eliminating the need to expand into natively vegetated spaces. Retaining the natural habitat around the playground allows migratory birds or other endangered species in the area to continue using the area as their home or resting place during migration. 3. Who is accessing your park the most? Who has the least access? What can you do to address the users with the least access? The current park space has a wide variety of park users who visit this site as it is shared with the Community Center/City Hall building and hockey rink which includes a warming house used as a bathroom facility throughout the year. All generations of residents visit the park for the playground, tennis/pickleball court, community buildings including the warming house facility. The current visitors with the least amount of access would be those with disabilities due to the lack of ADA compliant walkways and access points to the playground and other amenities. The new planned playground, sidewalks, benches and tables will allow those with disabilities to access the park and engage with others. The playground will utilize the pour ed-in-place rubber surfacing and engineered wood fiber for complete ADA accessibility. The new sidewalk will be ADA compliant with a zero-entry transfer into the playground area allowing visitors with limited mobility to access the play space and picnic area. The play structures will utilize transfer stations where disabled users will be able to move onto the platforms and utilize the play structure. An ADA approved swing will be installed with rubber surfacing below to ensure access and ease of transfer to the swing. The project will also add ADA compliant picnic tables and benches with concrete surfacing below for full access. Rev. Aug 10, 2011 ITEM 3 - PROJECT RELATION TO SCORP Discuss the following topics from the Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) that apply to your project. The SCORP is available at this link. How Does the Project Connect People to the Outdoors? 1. How does the proposed project design and redevelop outdoor recreation facilities so that they can accommodate varying forms of transportation to sites (e.g., driving, walking, biking)? This project does not solely improve the transportation to and from other sites or locations, but is planned in a way for future trail expansion which will serve other locations within the park and extensions of bike trails. The addition of the ADA sidewalk will eventually become part of a much larger trail improvement project which will connect this park property to a nearby park space currently planned for an outdoor amphitheater and event center. The sidewalk will also be potentially served by a proposed trail head and expansion of the Gateway Trail system through the City of Scandia from William O’Brien State Park. With the future trail additions, the playground location will be at the center of these two locations and will contribute to higher volumes of pedestrian traffic and a great opportunity for community use of the new playground and amenities. The playground location is located in close proximity to two main County roads which bring residents and commuters through the heart of the Village Center creating ease of access to the park property. 2. How does the proposed project design, develop, rehabilitate, and manage outdoor recreation facilities to provide a welcoming environment for people of all abilities and diverse backgrounds (e.g., accessible seating, bathrooms, drinking water, shade opportunities, informational signs, safety features)? The project design was built with the intent to have an accessible space for residents and visitors of all abilities and backgrounds. With the addition of accessible play structures, surfacing, sidewalks, benches and tables our goal is to attract not only the residents of Scandia but others from neighboring communities who do not have accessible facilities readily available to them. The two closest ADA accessible playgrounds include Big Marine Park Reserve (8 miles away) and Osceola Medical Center across the Minnesota/Wisconsin border (10 miles away). With the two other parks being of such distance away, local residents and residents of nearby communities will have the option of a closer facility with ADA accessibility. To create a welcoming culture, our playground facility will be available at no charge to use unlike the closest accessible playground located in the Big Marine Park Reserve which requires a daily or annual park pass fee. 3. How does the proposed project provide high-quality experiences to visitors through thoughtful design, programming, and interpretation (i.e., does the project develop or expand facilities to provide high quality experiences and/or interpretive signs )? The project intends to add interpretive educational signage through donations relating to the rain garden and how it will improve the adjacent wetland . Other signage with historical and natural features and local migratory or endangered species information will be added near the playground and park property as well. Thoughtful design to the sidewalk location and access points will allow unimpeded passage from the parking lot Rev. Aug 10, 2011 to the playground and picnic area. The unimpeded access picnic area creates accessibility for all users to enjoy the outdoor amenities. Does the Project Acquire Land and/or Create Opportunities? Acquisition (if you are not acquiring land, you may put “Not applicable” and move on to the Development/Redevelopment questions): 1. Does the proposed project accelerate the acquisition of private in-holdings and add lands to existing parks to enhance resource protection and recreational opportunities? Not applicable. 2. Does the proposed project acquire exceptional one-time opportunities of unique, high- quality natural resources that meet critical needs outside of regional centers? Not applicable. 3. Does the proposed project acquire land to connect protected and high -quality natural resource corridors? Not applicable. 4. Does the proposed project acquire land that protects important water resources including lakes, rivers, wetlands, shoreline, and critical watersheds? Not applicable. Development/Redevelopment: 5. How does the proposed project design, develop, and/or redevelop facilities that meet the differing outdoor recreation needs for people of all abilities (e.g., a quality natural setting for a high-quality recreational experience, universal design, family friendly facilities, more separation of uses, tent and RV and privacy between site for camp ing, etc.)? The playground design started with full intent to create an accessible space for all users. Every detail that was put into the plan utilizes the idea of accessible to everyone. The playground structures, swing set, tables and benches are all pl anned for accessibility by rubber surface or transfer station and flat surface. We believe this basic fundamental design will provide a high-quality recreational experience for individuals with disabilities which are unable to enjoy other nearby park spaces. The design also leaves room for expansion to connect a future trail system to the playground site from other local, regional, or states parks. The proposed future trails will connect to a proposed amphitheater and the Gateway Trail expansion through the City of Scandia from local William O’Brien State Park. 6. How does the proposed project create an accessible environment that is open and flexible to accommodate new and emerging nature-based recreation uses (e.g., facility design that supports numerous activities, maintains large open play areas, incorporates emerging nature-based activities, etc.)? The project is based on replacing the old structures and play area with only a limited amount of expansion to the playground footprint. The available open space of the current location will not be hindered in any way with the project and will provide accessibility the site has lacked for many years. Gaining the much-needed accessibility will allow for the future expansion of recreational uses of the site which could include but not limited to: child care programs, summer camps, or community engagement programs or events. An example of a potential community engagement effort could be centered around the demonstration of the rain garden, included in the project, by Rev. Aug 10, 2011 the local Watershed District for the function and impact installations have on wetland and waterbodies throughout the community. 7. How does the proposed project develop infrastructure and amenities that meet the needs and interests of future generations and diverse communities (e.g., develop group- based opportunities such as group campsites, group picnic areas, and gathering spaces used by diverse communities. Offers amenities that meet the lifestyles of our target markets such as wireless internet, playgrounds, family bathrooms, areas for specialized interest, etc.)? The new playground will accommodate multiple generations of visitors with diverse heritage. The picnic area will make the space more visitor friendly for either a small group or family gathering while using the playground or other facilities located in the park. The current outdoor space is served by wireless internet and available for any visitor to connect. The range of wireless service reaches well past the proposed playground and local residents visit the site due to the availability of fee internet services. The planned installation of new accessible benches and tables will help allow additional internet users to utilize the park space. 8. Is the proposed project designed and constructed with sustainable and resilient infrastructure (e.g., rely on up-to-date green infrastructure and best practice designs, is energy efficient, easy to maintain and uses recycled/recyclable materials, conserve the use of water at facilities and/or design facilities to effectively manage storm water onsite.)? The playground manufacturer selected utilizes green industry standards to protect the environment. Miracle Recreation is ISO14001 Certified and states on their webpage the following: slashing waste through improved technology and processes, selling unused plastic regrind to keep it out of landfills , recycling damaged plastic molded parts to manufacture Border Timbers, recycling all steel cutoffs into new steel, and implementing new corrugated, battery and plastic recycling programs . Surfacing products which will be used within the playground , especially the engineered wood fiber, will be ASTM Certified, non-toxic and free of any paints, stains or additives. The pour-in-place rubber surface utilizes recycled rubber products within the base layer which is then capped with a wear course to ensure its durability and longevity. The utilization of the pour-in-place rubber surface reduces the amount of wood fiber required to be replaced or added after settling or removal over time. As the need for wood fiber is reduced the yearly maintenance cost is reduced as well. Does the Project Take Care of What We Have? 1. Does the proposed project result in redevelopment, renovation, or rehabilitation of existing infrastructure to ensure high-quality and safe experiences for the public (e.g., roof replacement, structural replacement, trail resurfacing, trail head amenities refurbished, campgrounds rehabbed and updated, bring facilities up to modern codes and standards, and/or make it easy for everyone to access and enjoy parks and trails)? The new ADA playground surfacing, ADA compliant transfer stations and ADA compliant sidewalk will ensure high-quality and safe recreation upon completion of the project. The sidewalk and picnic area will allow for individuals with disabilities the opportunity to gather in the park space and enjoy the use of the playground structures. The access to the playground from the sidewalk will be zero entry directly Rev. Aug 10, 2011 onto the poured-and-place rubber surfacing which leads to each play features transfer station or access point and handicap accessible swing. 2. Does the project sponsor maintain a capital asset management plan to ensure protection and full utilization of the proposed facilities (yes or no, describe)? The City of Scandia does maintain a capital asset management plan through the utilization of replacement cycles and anticipated costs based on original purchase, market values and inflation. The management plan relating to this project following construction consists of monthly inspections of the equipment, dedicat ed budgeted funds for yearly maintenance, and a projected replacement schedule to match manufacturer recommendation. 3. Does the proposed project preserve existing high-quality natural areas and water resources? With the assistance of the local Carnelian-Marine-St. Croix Watershed district the planned rain garden within the scope of this project will assist in reducing the direct runoff from the hardscapes developed by the project or those currently on site. The project proposal will include a raingarden of at least 500 sq.ft. The plant material for the raingarden will be a mix of native forbs and shrubs that will add to any migratory forage in the area. 4. Does the proposed project restore and reconstruct natural communities that have been degraded or lost due to agriculture or development? Not Applicable. Rev. Aug 10, 2011 ITEM 4 - COST BREAKDOWN Development (see Program Manual for eligibility) Contingency and indirect costs are not eligible. Design/Engineering costs in excess of 10% of the total project construction cost are not eligible. Please be aware that we require all existing and proposed facilities to have accessible routes so please account for that in your cost breakdown. Facility (e.g., picnic area, campground, walkway, shelter, restroom) Description (linear feet, dimensions, material used, number of components, etc.) Cost Expected Completion Date Playground Three separate structures and two small individual play structures $119,335.73 Fall 2023 Poured-in-place rubber surface $41,330.00 Fall 2023 Engineered Wood Fiber $9,000.00 Fall 2023 Benches $5,000.00 Fall 2023 Picnic Tables $6,500.00 Fall 2023 ADA Sidewalk $5,000.00 Fall 2023 Playground Curbing $12,000.00 Fall 2023 Cement Pads for picnic tables and benches $2,500.00 Fall 2023 Landscaping and materials $5,834.27 Fall 2023 In-Kind staff hours $4,500.00 Fall 2023 Lions Donation used for construction costs or additional amenities $10,000.00 Fall2023 Rain Garden $4,000.00 Fall 2023 Total $225,000.00 Fall 2023 1. How were the cost estimates derived? The playground structures and surfacing were derived from an official quote from Webber Recreation. The benches and picnic tables were derived from quotes received by Pilot Rock RJ Thomas Manufacturing. The sidewalk, cement pads and curbing are based on estimates provided by our City Engineer. The landscaping and material costs are estimated by site evaluation fill and spoil requirements and to cover materials purchased for the installation of the rain garden and drainage system. City staff will be performing the excavation and drainage installation, used as In-Kind matching funds. 2. What assurances are there that the costs listed are reasonable? The cost estimates are based on actual quoted products and materials and estimates produced from our City Engineer using current construction valuations. 3. Describe any project elements or costs that will improve site resiliency and facility longevity, if any. Rev. Aug 10, 2011 All of the elements of this project will be of high-quality material and fabrication which will ensure this project will endure or surpass the intended lifespan. Subgrade improvements during the grading process will also be carefully monitored for stability of the site. The drain tile which will collect water within the playground area will also extend the life of the play surfaces reducing water logging or pooling of water. 4. What is the anticipated life span of the facilities that will be funded as part of this project? 25 Years 5. What is your recent experience completing similar projects with state or federal grant funding? The City of Scandia is currently working with Conservation Partners Legacy grant funding for improvements to the natural habitat of Lilleskogen Park. The project included the removal of invasive species; buckthorn, canary reed grass, and wild mustard. The project also included the addition of a nature trail, butterfly garden, and raingarden. The final re-establishment assessment will be completed in the Spring of 2022. Rev. Aug 10, 2011 Land Acquisition (if applicable) – Appraisal(s) must be attached. Parcel Identification Number or location Acres Appraised Value Expected Acquisition Date Not Applicable Total 1. Why is this acquisition needed? Not applicable. 2. Describe the existing resources and features of the site that make it desirable for public outdoor recreation. Not applicable. 3. Explain how you envision this acquisition contributing to outdoor recreation in the long term. Not applicable. 4. From whom is this property being purchased? Not applicable. 5. Are any buildings or structures being purchased along with the property? a. ☒ No b. ☐ Yes – Describe what is planned for those structures and whether the grant funded project includes the value of those structures. Not applicable. 6. How and when will the site be made open and accessible for public outdoor recreation use? For acquisition only grants, park and funding acknowledgement signs must be posted prior to close of the grant and the park open for public access. Recreation facilities must be developed within three years from the date of acquisition. Not applicable. 7. Is this property being acquired under threat of condemnation? Not applicable. 8. Was the property listed for public sale? a. ☒ No b. ☐ Yes – Explain how the property owner was made aware of the grant sponsor’s interest in the property. Not applicable. 9. Does this project involve donated property? a. ☒ No b. ☐ Yes – Include evidence that the seller was offered the fair market value of the property as just compensation and willingly chose to donate the property instead. Not applicable. Rev. Aug 10, 2011 ITEM 5 - PROJECT SITE EVALUATION All applicants must prepare and submit a Project Site Evaluation. The project site evaluation will provide information necessary to determine the impacts of the project, if any, on the environmental and cultural resources of the area. It is very important, therefore, that the project site evaluation identify all possible impacts of the proposed project. This wi ll help in determining whether any changes in project scope or design may be required or whether mitigation measures must be undertaken. The following sources of information may be helpful in completing the evaluation: Endangered Species and Critical Habitat: US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) Report provides a list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the USFWS’ jurisdiction that are known or expected to be in or near the project area. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site-specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project-specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information. Additional information on animals and plants that are endangered, threatened or merit special consideration or management is available from the Minnesota Natural Heritage Program/Nongame Wildlife Program, Section of Wildlife, Department of Natural Resources (DNR). A booklet entitled Minnesota’s List of Endangered and Threatened Animal Species, that includes a list of all species of Minnesota's animals and plants listed under the provisions of the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, Public Law 93-205, and/or Minnesota Statute 84.0895, is available from the DNR by calling (651) 296-6157 or (888) 646-6367 or at the DNR website Minnesota's Endangered, Threatened, and Special Concern Species . Additional information may be obtained by calling the Division of Ecological Resources information number at (651) 259-5100. The DNR is also developing biological surveys on a county-by-county basis on sensitive natural habitats and rare plant and animal species. Several publications are available which provide detailed information on these subjects. Additional information about county biological surveys is available at Minnesota Biological Survey. Wetlands: Minnesota has adopted a "no-net-loss" wetlands policy. Each state agency must ensure that its activities, including state sponsored, financed, or assisted projects, do not contribute to the loss or diminishment of the many important values of wetlands. Unavoidable impacts must be minimized, and compensatory mitigation must be provided for all values th at have been lost or diminished. The basic reference for wetland determination will be the National Wetlands Inventory produced by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and available at the DNR. Questions regarding implementation of the "no-net-loss" policy and identification of wetlands may be directed to the Ecological Resources Division, DNR at (651) 259-5100. Rev. Aug 10, 2011 Project Site Evaluation: Using the following format and subject categories below, address all of the points covered under each category and be specific. It is important that the project site evaluation be a complete and accurate assessment of the natural and/or scenic characteristics of the area and the likely impacts of the project, either positive or negative, on those characteristics. Part 1 - Description of the Environment and Environmental Impact of the Proposed Project A. Present Land Use: Describe the existing site conditions, facilities, and park acres. The existing site has been well maintained and has a mix of turfgrass areas, tennis court, hockey and pleasure rink, large parking lot, Community Center/City Hall building , Warming House with bathroom facilities and existing playground. The park acreage equals 15.09 acres. 1. Explain why the site is suitable for the type of outdoor recreation proposal being submitted. The site is very suitable for outdoor recreation as it is a highly visited area not only by park users but visitors who utilize the Community Center/City Hall building. The park is also a main location for the seasonal events which take place in the City of Scandia and will be well used during those events. Many local events happen annually or seasonally at this location including: Taco Daze, Vinterfest, a Tree Lighting Ceremony and a Farmers Market which runs weekly between June and September. With ample parking for the facilities, multiple events can happen on site while still maintaining access to the play structures and amenities. Also, the playground to be renovated is the main playground which residents and visitors use regularly day to day and will become more usable with the ADA accessib le additions. 2. Does the site include any elements that visually detract from the outdoor recreation experience or that represent a potential public safety hazard? a. ☒ No b. ☐ Yes – Explain and describe whether this project will help to address those concerns. Not applicable. B. Environmental Intrusions: Describe all rights-of-way, easements, reversionary interests, etc. within the proposed boundary area. All existing and future overhead power lines serving the park must be placed underground. The cost of placing the power lines underground can be included in this application. The existing power lines which serve the park are currently underground with no augmentation required to build the new playground. The project does not require any additional power or augmented power lines to complete the build. The utility easements are along the perimeter of the park and located in the Right-of-Way. Only two borders of the park contain Right-of-Way easements; one is a City road Right-of- Way and the other is a County road Right-of-Way. C. Fish and Wildlife: Indicate whether the proposed project site is on or adjacent to a national, state, or local wildlife management area, park, or natural area. Describe the known fish and wildlife species common to the project site and any known species that are listed as endangered, threatened or of special concern. Describe the likely impacts of the proposed Rev. Aug 10, 2011 project on habitat, population levels, and any other factors related to the fish and wildlife resources. The IPaC website was consulted for potential species of concern and endangered species. Nine Migratory birds are listed that will not be negatively impacted as part of this project since no trees or shrubs will be cleared. Northern Long Eared Bat is in the region. No trees (potential nesting sites) will be cleared as part of this pr oject. This is a city owned park space with primarily manicured lawn where no other resources of concern (primarily mussels/clams) will be affected since no work on or near water will be performed. The project proposal will include a raingarden of at leas t 500 sqft. The planting plan for the raingarden and surrounding improvements will be a mix of native forbs and shrubs that will add to any migratory forage in the area. The Washington Conservation District staff (local SWCD) will assist with species selection to ensure there are forage and cover plant species that are of importance to some of the migratory birds listed on our IPaC inquiry, thus enhancing and increasing pollinator and migratory habitat D. Vegetation: Describe the major plant species and communities common to the project site and any known species that are listed as endangered, threatened or of special concern. Describe the distribution of major plant communities or types on the site. Indicate the extent of cutting, clearing, removal or other disturbance that will result from the proposed project, as well as any restoration and/or protection activities planned as part of the project. No clearing of trees or shrubs will occur as part of this project. The area is primarily manicured lawn. As listed in Question E, the Washington Conservation District staff (local SWCD) will assist with species selection to ensure there are forage and cover plant species that are of importance to some of the migratory birds listed on our IPaC inquiry, thus enhancing and increasing existing pollinator and migratory habitat. E. Wetland Resources: Describe any existing wetland areas on or adjacent to the proposed project site. Indicate any likely physical disturbances of these wetlands, including (but not limited to) draining and filling that would result from the proposed project. Describe any other potential impacts to wetlands, such as water level fluctuations or water pollution that may result from the proposed project. Discuss possible alternatives that would avo id or minimize negative wetland impacts. Also describe any other water resources on or adjacent to the site, proposed uses of surface or groundwater, and any possible impacts on these resources, including depletion or pollution, resulting from the proposed project. Explain how the proposed project would help to protect water quality on or adjacent to the site. The project does not trigger stormwater rules from the local watershed district. Therefore, the raingarden being proposed goes above and beyond local stormwater requirements, which are some of the most comprehensive rules in our county. Water does flow toward the wetland to the northeast of the site at a 1-3% slope but will be intercepted by the raingarden. During construction, proper silt fencing around the eastern and northern edges will be placed, and a temporary depression where the final raingarden will reside will be in place to intercept any flows to the wetland. The wetland is also buffered by at least 50-100 linear feet of woodland vegetation and this buffer will not be disturbed. F. Geologic and Physiographic Features: Describe any interesting, unique, or fragile geologic and/or physiographic features on the proposed project site and any likely impacts on these Rev. Aug 10, 2011 features that would result from the proposed project. Also describe any proposed protection activities or measures to provide public education, interpretation, and enjoyment of these resources. No such features exist on or adjacent to the site. G. Air Quality/Noise: Describe any temporary or permanent air or noise pollution that will result from the development and use of the site and the impacts on adjacent land uses or landowners. No significant increase in noise and no significant decrease of air quality will be affected upon completion of the project. During construction, exits will be wetted periodically if dust is a nuisance. There are also city codes applicable to enforcement of construction-based nuisance activities. For the following questions, please send an email to DataRequestSHPO@state.mn.us with the township, section, range of the park and ask for a data search for previously known archaeologica l sites and historic properties in the project area. Take a look at the information you get back, if any, to see if they are in or adjacent to the project area. Use this along with your community history to respond to the questions. Be sure to attach the information received from DataRequestSHPO to your application. H. Archeology/ Ground Disturbances: Provide a description of current and historic land use and ground disturbances. Include available information concerning known or suspected archaeological resources within or adjacent to the park. Indicate if any of these identified resources will be impacted by the proposed project. The current land use within the property of the project location is municipal service. According to DataRequestSHPO, one known archeologic reference at the Gammelgarden property has been documented. The documented site is adjacent to the property of the project location. The area referenced by DataRequestSHPO will not be impacted by the construction of the playground. I. Historic Structures: List known historic buildings or structures located within or adjacent to the project area (i.e., individual properties or districts which are listed in the National Register of Historic Places, or which meet the criteria for listing in the National Register). If applicable, identify any expected or potential impacts to these properties with the proposed project. The known historic structures adjacent to the project site will not be impacted by the removal and replacement of the playground structure and addition of new amenities. According to DataRequestSHPO the historic sites adjacent to the site are: Elim Lutheran Church, Elim Pastor House, Elim Cemetery, and Gammelgarden Museum. No known historic buildings or structures have been documented within the property of the project location. J. Surveys: Have there been any previous cultural and/or historic resource surveys completed that included this site within the area of potential effect that was assessed? ☒ No – Describe any construction planned as a result of this project that will extend beyond the pre-existing disturbance area (including surface area and depth). This project will not extend past the pre-existing disturbance area within the park property. Rev. Aug 10, 2011 ☐ Yes – Attach survey and summarize findings and include page number references below. Not Applicable Rev. Aug 10, 2011 Part 2 - Environmental Screening Form (ESF): The table below serves as a record of the environmental resources present at the site, whether the proposed action is likely to have a significantly negative impact on those resources, and whether further information is needed to determine the potential impact. Review the listed resources and identify any resources that may be significantly impacted by the action. The Environmental Screening Form (ESF) should be completed with professional input from resource experts and in consultation with relevant local, state, tribal, and federal governments, as appropriate. For each resource, indicate if positive or negative impacts are anticipated to result from the action or if further information is needed to determine the potential impact. Site Name: How will the project affect the following resources? + - ? n/a 1 Air quality ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 2 Circulation and transportation ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 3 Climate ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 4 Contamination or hazardous materials even if remediated ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 5 Endangered species: (listed or proposed threatened or endangered) including associated habitat ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ 6 Environmental justice: minority and low-income populations ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ 7 Geological resources: soils, bedrock, slopes, streambeds, landforms, etc. ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ 8 Historic or cultural resources ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 9 Invasive species ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 10 Land use plans or policies from other agencies including tribes ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 11 Lightscapes, especially night sky ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 12 Migratory birds ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ 13 Recreation resources ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ 14 Socioeconomics: changes to tax base or competition with private sector ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 15 Sound (noise impacts) ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 16 Unique ecosystems, such as biosphere reserves, World Heritage sites, old growth forests, etc. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 17 Water quality and/or quantity ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ 18 Water: coastal barrier resources or coastal zones ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 19 Water: marine and/or estuarine ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 20 Water: stream flow characteristics ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 21 Water: wetlands and floodplains ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ 22 Other important resources Explain: ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ + indicates positive impacts are anticipated to result from the action - indicates negative impacts are anticipated to result from the action ? indicates further information is needed to determine the potential impac t n/a indicates resource does not exist on site or there is no impact Rev. Aug 10, 2011 1. Have there been any previous environmental documents that are relevant to this project or this specific site? a. ☒ No b. ☐ Yes – Attach and summarize findings and include page number references below 2. Explain any negative or unknown impacts identified in the Table of the ESF. Not applicable. 3. How was the information identified in the table derived and what sources of data were used to justify the impact selection? The state of the current site and the scope of work of the project requires limited disturbance outside of the current playground border. With a majority of the work taking place over existing installations there is no concern of disturbing natural or native areas and not to create an impedance of access to the site or other facilities currently serving the surrounding park space. 4. Who contributed to filling out the ESF (include name, title, agency) and what qualifications do they have that provide the necessary resource expertise to determine impact significance? Charles Fischer, Director of Public Works, City of Scandia. Our Public Works Director completed the ESF form as the project is deemed to have no critical impact to the environment or has no negative impact to the local community. With no negative or questionable impact based on the table above no other professional source was used to determine the outcomes selected in the table. 5. List all required federal, state, and local permits/approvals needed for the proposal and explain their purpose and status. Local grading and building permits will be required for this project through the City of Scandia. Rev. Aug 10, 2011 ITEM 6 – PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND BENEFIT Address the following questions regarding public participation, planning process and how this project will provide new and/or expanded recreational opportunities. 1. Describe both short- and long-term outdoor recreation benefits that will be achieved as a result of this project. The accessibility of the playground for the proposed project meets both short and long-term recreational benefits. Long-term benefits will be having the ability to promote recreational programs which will be able to utilize the playground and open space the park provides. In the last two years, there has been a decrease in recreational activities promoted by the City due to the lack of accessible facilities and this project will help bridge the deficiency we currently have. The short -term recreational benefit of the project includes the ability to start the planning phases of new or re-establishing outdoor organized activities for the community. When the City is able to organize new programs, in the project location, it will become a long-term benefit to the community through recurring activities year after year utilized by the residents and other local communities. 2. Explain how this project fits as part of other projects planned for this same site in the next three years. Currently, the City of Scandia has committed to supporting the expansion of the Gateway Trail through the heart of Scandia from William O’Brien State Park. The expansion of trails also includes a proposed connection to a new Heritage Center that includes an amphitheater which will be built on the same grounds as this playground project. The playground location is only 800 linear feet of trail in eith er direction from the proposed Gateway Trail head and the proposed new Heritage Center. With the location of the playground project directly between the two potential sites the use of the playground and trail network is anticipated to greatly increase the pedestrian traffic through the Community Center Park. The future vision of the park property has been thoroughly reviewed by the City and local organization and feel it best to begin the playground project to help support the future growth of the community. 3. Describe the process that led to the development of this proposal and how the public was involved? Who was involved and how were they able to review the completed proposal, including any state, local, federal agency professionals, subject matter experts, members of the public and Indian Tribe? The current playground site has been in need of replacement for many years and the funding for the project has finally reached a level which best suits the proposed project and the needs of the community. The initial phase of the project began with community engagement through community surveys and direct contact through our Parks and Recreation Committee and residents. After surveys and community comments were collected the Parks and Recreation Committee developed a sub- committee to consolidate and inventory the requests of the community. Once all of the information was gathered, the Parks and Recreation Committee called upon one committee member and the Director of Public Works to gather proposals fr om local playground vendors based on the community responses. The project designs and Rev. Aug 10, 2011 proposals were then gathered and the project plans and costs were examined to ensure the needs of the community and budget were met. Due to the number of proposals received the sub-committee then provided three options to the Parks and Recreation Committee who then chose the final proposal to sponsor and recommend to the City Council. After the approval of the Council, Public Works is now in search of support through grants and donations to help bring the project to life. The community greatly supports the endeavor and with a matching fund of $112,500 the City of Scandia believes the new playground will highlight the needs of the community. 4. Please include detail on how the public was notified. What information was made available and what opportunity to be involved in planning and developing of your proposal was provided? Describe any public meetings held and/or formal public comment periods, including dates and length of time provided for the public to participate in the planning process and/or to provide comments on the completed proposal. Were formal comments received and did you provide written responses? To gather input from the community on the proposed pla yground replacement project, the City hosted an online engagement survey. Survey results were solicited through the Scandia newsletter, the City of Scandia’s Facebook page, the City website, and through the Scandia regional Nextdoor webpage. The survey p eriod was October 21, 2020 through November 20, 2020. The survey yielded a total of 35 responses. Survey questions included information about how often residents visit the current playground amenities, how far away they live from the city center, and the approximate ages of children in their care. Questions regarding playground equipment included their preferred amenities (i.e. climbing structures, slides, swings, etc.), playground theming, and surfacing. The online survey also provided opportunities for the respondents to provide comments and feedback. The survey responses indicated there was significant support for the project and several respondents specifically requested to be involved in the project planning. As a result of the survey responses, the City formed a subcommittee to the Scandia Parks and Recreation Committee (PRC) dedicated to the playground replacement project. The subcommittee (Scandia Parks Playground Replacement Committee, or SPPRC) included two members from the PRC and three members from the public. The SPPRC met monthly for approximately six months to determine playground equipment priorities, review supplemental funding opportunities and evaluate playground equipment features. Representatives from the SPPRC and the City met wi th playground vendors at the project site to discuss playground equipment and layout opportunities. Ultimately, the SPPRC narrowed the proposed playground layout options to two and presented them to the PRC for final selection. A final selection was then chosen by the PRC in November 2021. The City greatly values the process of public engagement and actively sought out community opinions and feedback throughout the playground equipment selection process, through an online survey and the establishment of the subcommittee specific to this project. In addition, meetings discussing the playground were always open to public attendance, with opportunities for public comment and response. ITEM 7 – AVAILABILITY FOR PUBLIC USE Rev. Aug 10, 2011 All facilities within the park must be designed and available for general public use and open during typical park hours. This includes restrooms, picnic shelters, campgrounds, playgrounds and other structures. For parks that include marina or campground facilities, a minimum of 50% of the berths/campground spaces must be available for short-term rental and an equitable method of allocating long-term rentals shall be used. All personal property must be removed at the end of each use season. State the specific hours of operation and any current or anticipated programmed use for the facilities proposed to be funded with this application. Saying the park will be open during normal park hours is not specific. Also describe any arrangements with schools, local organizations, clubs, or city programs for the use of the facilities. Explain how this may impact facility availability to the general public. Describe what fees, if any, will be charged for use of the park facilities and/or access to the park. The proposed project relates specifically to a public playground and anticipated hours of use year-round will be between dusk until dawn on a daily basis to maximize usage and promote safe play during daylight hours. The bathroom facility which serves the park is electronically locked and unlocked at specific times throughout the year. The times in which the door locks are programed typically match seasonal daylight hours. The playground currently has no reservation policy which would not limit the use at any specific time of day. Also, the City does not plan to incorporate a rental program for the playground. The grounds which surround the playground are used for multiple community events throughout the year; specifically, Taco Daze, which is managed through the Local Scandia Marine Lions Club and Vinterfest, which is managed by the Scandia Parks and Recreation Committee and also a Farmers Market seasonal run from June until September. Each event uses the space surrounding the playground but does not restrict any time the playground is open for general public use. Two of the stated events may have the potential to limit the parking access to the playground in which an availability issue may arise as some of the parking area is used for the events activities. The City does not charge users for access to the playground or other supporting amenities including the restroom facilities which are open daily for public use. Rev. Aug 10, 2011 ITEM 8 - STATEMENT OF ACCESSIBILITY All facilities improved with this grant project must meet current Americans with Disabilities (ADA) standards and the final guidelines for Outdoor Developed Areas. In addition, all critical existing components of the park listed below must be accessible to persons with disabilities. Critical components include: • Accessible parking spaces serving each area of the park. • Accessible restrooms, if restrooms are provided. • Accessible drinking water, if drinking water is provided. • Access routes to all recreation facilities provided in the park. If your facilities do not have access routes to them, you need to include the cost in your Cost Breakdown. For this program, an access route must be a minimum of five feet wide, slip resistant, firm and stable. If a grant is awarded, part of the grant will be withheld pending verification of access compliance by an on-site final inspection. The following guidelines will help you design your facilities. Copies can be ordered from the U.S. Access Board at (800) 872-2253 or downloaded from their website at United States Access Board. 1. ADA Accessibility Standards for Buildings and Facilities (For buildings and certain recreation facilities including playgrounds, recreational boating facilities, and fishing piers) 2. Final Accessibility Guidelines for Outdoor Developed Areas September 26, 2013 (For outdoor developed areas such as campgrounds, picnic areas, trails, and beaches . These guidelines, developed for federal facilities subject to the Architectural Barriers Act, are to be used for facilities improved by this Outdoor Recreation Grant Program.) How are access requirements under the ADA Standards, Final Accessibility Guidelines for Outdoor Developed Areas and all critical components, stated above, being addressed in this project? Be specific. The standards which are applied to this project reflect the provisions of multiple Chapters found in the ADA Accessibility Standards for Buildings and Facilities . Within Chapter 10, Sections 1008.2, 1008.3, and 1008.4 reflect the playground design elements within the scope of work for the project. Sidewalks included with the project follow the standards set in Chapter 4 and the exceptions listed in 1008.2.1 through 1008.2.3. The sidewalk design will have a walking slope no more than 1:20 and side slope of no more than 1:48. The pedestrian ramp from the parking lot area will meet ADA standards as well including a slope of no more than 1:12 with a counter slope of no more than 1:20 in regards to maintaining the curb line for storm water flow. Truncated domes will be used within the ramp to indicate users of the location of the ramp. The accessible routes within the playground will follow the guidelines in 1008.2.4.1 meeting minimum clearances of 44 or 60 inches. Transfer stations within the play structure will conform to sections 1008.3.1.4 and 108.3.2 allowing disabled users the Rev. Aug 10, 2011 opportunity to access an elevated play area. Handicap accessible parking will be included by transitioning three current parking stalls into two ADA compliant stalls. By completing this transition each area or building within the park will have separated accessible parking space provided. The surfacing material within the playground will be two separate materials also installed at the same grade for zero entry from one to the other. The engineered wood fiber surface material will be verified to be IPEMA Certified to ASTM specifications and ADA compliant. The other poured-in-place rubber surface will also be ADA compliant and IPEMA Certified. Rev. Aug 10, 2011 ITEM 9 - PROJECTED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS Estimate the projected operations and maintenance costs for each facility to be developed or improved by this grant, including routine costs (such as labor, materials, utility costs and equipment costs), and planned major repairs or preventive maintenance (such as seal coating or replacement of plumbing, lighting, aglime, turf, etc.). The great part about installing a playground is that they provide years of quality use without the need for major routine maintenance costs. The addition of rubberized poured-in-place surface within the playground helps reduce the operating cost of the playground year-to- year. The remaining section of the playground served by engineered wood fiber will be monitored for depth and new material will be added yearly if needed or before minimum safe depths are reached. An anticipated yearly cost of $1,500 for new mulch wi ll be supported by our Parks General Fund to accommodate the need for additional mulch. Playground inspections will be routine and any needed adjustments or replacement of parts will be done by Public Works staff. Cost of labor for routine inspections and maintenance is estimated to cost the City between $1,000 and $1,200 annually which includes inspection, daily mulch maintenance, and general clean up. The sidewalk, park benches and tables are estimated to last 20 to 30 years requiring minimum maintenance other than general cleaning and inspection. Estimated yearly maintenance costs to these amenities are between $200 and $500 and is heavily dependent on the daily usage of the playground area. The scope of this project does not require the need for any elec trical or mechanical installations and no yearly budgeted cost are assumed. The projected replacement cost of $500,000 for this project, in 25-30 years, is possible but very difficult to predict with such a long life-span for each component within the project. Overall, yearly maintenance cost associated with this project are minimal in comparison to the amount of use and enjoyment that will be provided to the community. Rev. Aug 10, 2011 ATTACHMENT A - APPLICANT’S RESOLUTION A copy of this approved resolution, with no wording changes, must be included with the application. BE IT RESOLVED that <APPLICANT> act as legal sponsor for the project contained in the Outdoor Recreation Grant application to be submitted on <DAY / MONTH / YEAR> and that <APPLICANTS REPRESENTATIVE> is hereby authorized to apply to the Department of Natural Resources for funding of this project on behalf of <APPLICANT>. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant has read the Conflict of Interest Policy conta ined in the Outdoor Recreation Grant Program Manual and, upon discovery, certifies it will report to the State any actual, potential, or perceived individual or organizational conflicts of interest to the application or grant award. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that <APPLICANT> has the legal authority to apply for financial assistance, and it has the financial capability to meet the match requirement (if any) and ensure adequate construction, operation, maintenance and replacement of the proposed project for its design life. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that <APPLICANT> has not incurred any development costs and has not entered into a written purchase agreement to acquire the property described in the Cost Breakdown section on this application. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that <APPLICANT> has or will acquire fee title or permanent easement over the land described in the site plan included in the application. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, upon approval of its application by the State, <APPLICANT> may enter into an agreement with the State for the above-referenced project, and that <APPLICANT> certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the grant agreement including dedicating the park property for uses consistent with the funding grant program into perpetuity. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that <TITLE OF AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL> is hereby authorized to execute such agreements as necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant. I CERTIFY THAT the above resolution was adopted by the < City Council, County Board, etc.> of <APPLICANT> on <DAY / MONTH / YEAR>. SIGNED: WITNESSED: ________________________________ _____________________________________ (Signature) (Signature) _______________________________ _____________________________________ (Title) (Date) (Title) (Date) Rev. Aug 10, 2011 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-13 CITY OF SCANDIA WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING OUTDOOR RECREATION GRANT APPLICATION FOR PLAYGROUND EQUIPMANET REPLACEMENT BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Scandia act as legal sponsor for the project contained in the Outdoor Recreation Grant application to be submitted on March 16, 2022 and that Public Works Director Charles Fischer is hereby authorized to apply to the Department of Natural Resources for funding of this project on behalf of the City of Scandia. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant has read the Conflict of Interest Policy contained in the Outdoor Recreation Grant Program Manual and, upon discovery, certifies it will report to the State any actual, potential, or perceived individual or organizational conflicts of interest to the application or grant award. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Scandia has the legal authority to apply for financial assistance, and it has the financial capability to meet the match requirement (if any) and ensure adequate construction, operation, maintenance and replacement of the proposed project for its design life. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Scandia has not incurred any development costs and has not entered into a written purchase agreement to acquire the property described in the Cost Breakdown section on this application. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Scandia has or will acquire fee title or permanent easement over the land described in the site plan included in the application. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, upon approval of its application by the State, the City of Scandia may enter into an agreement with the State for the above-referenced project, and that the City of Scandia certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the grant agreement including dedicating the park property for uses consistent with the funding grant program into perpetuity. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Public Works Director Charles Fischer is hereby authorized to execute such agreements as necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant. Adopted by the City Council this 15th day of March, 2022. ________________________________ Christine Maefsky, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Kenneth Cammilleri, City Administrator Rev. Aug 10, 2011 ATTACHMENT B - LOCATION MAP Provide a map that shows the location of the park within your community. The map should identify the main roads in the community to access the park. ATTACHMENT C - RECREATIONAL SITE PLAN This Recreational Site Plan must be drawn to scale, show the entire existing park boundary, all existing facilities in the park and all acquisition and/or development listed in the Cost Breakdown. All facilities must be identified with legible labels. The Recreational Site Plan will become part of the grant contract, so it is important to have a good plan. Include the following: • Title "Recreation Site Plan" and the project name. • Draw and label the complete park boundary. This boundary must include all contiguous lands currently owned by the applicant and managed for public recreation and any additional land to be acquired with this grant. • Entrance to the park and location of existing or proposed public parking facilities. • Location of all existing and planned recreation and support facilities such as restrooms, shelters, and potable water. • Indicate any rights-of-ways, easements, reversionary interests, etc. to the park area including overhead utility lines. • Geographic reference point such as a section corner or designated road intersection. • All lakes, rivers, streams and wetlands and adjacent land uses. • Acreage of the park and/or each parcel to be acquired. • Access routes to all existing and proposed facilities. • Signed and dated by the applicant. Rev. Aug 10, 2011 • North arrow and Graphic Bar Scale using the example below: A Text Scale such as 1” = 500’ is not acceptable. Color Coding • Red Park boundary. • Green Existing facilities that will remain. • Yellow Acquisition and/or development accomplished with this grant . 500 Feet 250 0 Rev. Aug 10, 2011 Rev. Aug 10, 2011 ATTACHMENT D – PHOTOS Please include photos of all existing recreational facilities/structures and all buildings. Indicate below each photo the year the facility/building was constructed and if it will remain as is, be renovated or be removed. Current Playground – Constructed in the 1990’s – Removed for this project Rev. Aug 10, 2011 Tennis/Pickleball Courts – Resurfaced in 2018 – Remain as is City Hall/Community Center – Built in 1985 – Remain as is Rev. Aug 10, 2011 Cold Storage Building (Former Public Works Building) – Constructed in the 1970’s – Remain as is Rev. Aug 10, 2011 Warming House – Constructed in 1990’s – Remain as is Rev. Aug 10, 2011 Boarded Hockey Rink and Pleasure Rink – boards installed in the 1990’s – Remain as is ATTACHMENT E – PLANS Please submit all applicable plan(s) according to the directions provided below. Rev. Aug 10, 2011 Trail Plans Trail plans are required for projects that include the development of any type of trail and should include the following: 1. A typical cross section of the trail. 2. The trail width, surfacing and base materials. For the purposes of this grant program, a multi-purpose trail should be designed to a minimum 8' width. In some cases, this minimum width may not be adequate and a width of 10' or more may be appropriate. All access routes/walkways connecting park facilities from trail and/or parking lots must be a minimum of 5 feet wide. Rev. Aug 10, 2011 All trails and access routes must be firm, stable, and slip resistant. Rev. Aug 10, 2011 Rev. Aug 10, 2011 Playground Plans Priority will be given to playground designs that provide a high degree of safety and accessibility. The facility should be d esigned to provide an integrated play setting for both children and parents/care providers of all abilities. Playground facilities must be, at a minimum, designed using the ADA Accessibility Standards, Chapter 10, 1008 Play Areas. Applications that do not include enough information to determine the degree of accessibility and safety typically do not score high enough for funding. The plan must legible and: 1. Show all the proposed playground components and all existing components that will remain. Label each component with its name and the height of its useable surfaces. 2. Indicate which components are ground level and which are elevated. 3. Highlight in yellow all accessible components. 4. Identify all type(s), depth(s) and location(s) of the fall-protection surfacing. 5. Highlight in green all accessible surface areas. Rev. Aug 10, 2011 Rev. Aug 10, 2011 Rev. Aug 10, 2011 Rev. Aug 10, 2011 Green Highlight represent Poured-In-Place Rubber surface – ADA accessible surface – depth of 1.5”-5” per fall height play component Brown Highlight represents Engineered Wood Fiber surface – ADA accessible surface – depth of 12”-16”