Loading...
4. Staff Report-Wayfinding Staff Report Date of Meeting: 5/24/2022 For: Tourism Committee From: Charles Fischer – Director of Public Works Subject: Wayfinding Signage Update: Public Works, Washington County representatives, and a member of the Scandia Tourism Committee met through virtual meeting to discuss the possibility of placing wayfinding signs within the County ROW. The discussion ended with the possibility of a program with approval by the County through a MOU (Memo of Understanding). A MOU will first need to be approved by the City Council. With a Council approved MOU, it will then be sent to Washington County for their approval as well. Even with a developed and approved MOU by the City there is a chance the County would not approve the program or sign designs and standards. If the County were to approve the program all existing wayfinding signage which is County owned and maintained would either be removed or potentially left in place. The City would then take over ownership and maintenance responsibility if signs were to remain in place meeting the standards set in the MOU. The County will still hold discretion for the removal of existing or future installed signage if it were to fail to meet County standards or possibly interfere with future County projects involving the ROW. The City will also need to apply for ROW permits for each future sign requiring the installation of a sign post. Application fees apply to the City of up to $100 per sign. Within the Village Center wayfinding could be allowed on City owned street lamp posts without ROW permit, but will be required to follow the sign design and standards set in a potential MOU. Public Works has been researching the requirements for a MOU in regards to sign design and standards for a Wayfinding Signage Program. This MOU will be in reference to signs placed in the County ROW whether on City owned lamp posts or new post installation. The MOU requires multiple levels of sign design and standards and will need to be submitted to the City Council for approval before submitting to the County. Cost estimates will also need to be included as a reference for Council to understand the funding required to implement and maintain wayfinding signage by the Public Works Department. To implement a wayfinding sign program will initially come with a high expense, due to the removal of existing signage by the State and County, replacing all or most of the removed signage. Not only will a program like this need budgeted funding, but will also add another maintenance requirement to the Public Works Department, with limited availability operating with three full time staff, currently responsible for road, sewer, equipment, ROW, parks, and building maintenance. Future budgeting or allocation of funds for a program is possible with Council approval. A final key point is the removal of existing signage by the State and County. The Committee must keep in mind that the removal of all existing signage will be removed. The removal of individual business wayfinding signage will be the most notable as the new City wayfinding signage will not include individual business names, a requirement by the State and must be included in the MOU with the County. The businesses personally or directly funded the installation of these signs and this program will exclude that opportunity. Public Works suggests documenting all existing signage currently in the State and County ROW for the Committee to be familiar of the quantity and identification of existing signage. Which can then be used to develop a map for this potential program.