7.b)1) TKDA Memo-Robinson Variance � 444 Cedar Street,Suite 1500
�` Saint Poul,MN 55101
651.292.4400
� tkda.com
TKDA
Memorandum
To: Scandia City Council Reference: Robinson Variance Application,
Kristina Handt, City City of Scandia
Administrator
Copies To: Daniel Robinson, applicant
Project No.: 15253.011
From: Sherri Buss, RLA AICP, Routing:
Planner
Date: June 11, 2013
SUBJECT: Robinson Variance Request for Replacement and Expansion of
Nonconforming Accessory Structure and Number and Area of
Accessory Structures
MEETING DATE: June 18, 2013
LOCATION: 22920 Meadowbrook Avenue
Scandia, Minnesota
APPLICANTS: Daniel Robinson
ZONING: General Rural District and Shoreland Zone
60-DAY PERIOD: July 13, 2013
ITEMS REVIEWED: Application and Plan received May 13, 2013
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting a variance to replace and enlarge an existing nonconforming garage
with a larger garage. The existing garage is a nonconforming structure that is closer to the road
right-of-way than the primary structure. The applicant is proposing to place the new garage in
the same location, and enlarge the structure to the north, while maintaining the current distance
to the road right-of-way. The applicant is also requesting a variance from the standards that
limit the number and size of accessory structures to keep an existing shed structure along with
the expanded garage. If both the garage expansion and existing accessory structure are
permitted, the number and area of accessory structures would exceed those permitted by the
Development Code.
The property is 2.53 acres in size, and is located in the General Rural (GR) District and within
the Shoreland Zone of Bone Lake, a Recreational Development lake.
An emptoyee owned company promoting affirmative action and equal opportunity
Robinson Variance Staff Report
Scandia City Council Page 2 June 18,2013
DETAILED EVALUATION OF THE REQUEST:
Comprehensive Plan
The Comprehensive Plan indicates that the General Rural District includes areas of mixed lot
sizes, and will continue to do so. Single-family residential uses are supported in the GR District.
The plan recommends that the General Rural Area be developed at a maximum density of four
dwelling units per 40 acres, with a minimum allowed lot size of 2 acres. The Shoreland Overlay
District also permits single-family residences and accessory structures. The Comprehensive
Plan and Shoreland Overlay District recommend and require the protection of steep slopes and
water resources.
The proposed use of the propertv and existinq lot size are consistent with the qoals of the
Comprehensive Plan for the General Rural District and Shoreland Overlay District. The
proposal to maintain the existinq retaininq wall and separation between the qaraqe and the bluff
is consistent with Comprehensive Plan and Overlav District qoals and requirements to protect
natural resources and steep slopes.
Development Code Requirements: Lot Size and Setbacks
The applicant's lot is 2.53 acres in size, and conforms to the minimum lot size requirements of
the Development Code.
The required setbacks in the Shoreland Overlay District for Bone Lake (a Recreational
Development lake) and the underlying General Rural District that apply to the Robinson property
include the following:
• Right-of-way of public street: 40 feet
• Side: 20 feet
• Rear: 50 feet
• Top of bluff:30 feet
The Shoreland Overlay Districts requires that structures be setback a minimum of 100 feet from
the Ordinary High Water Level of Recreational Development Lakes such as Bone Lake. The
primarv structure and the three existinq accessory structures on the propertv meet the setback
requirements.
The Shoreland Overlay District requires that structures be set back 30 feet from the top of the
bluff line. The Robinson property has a steep slope behind the existing garage that qualifies as
a bluff. The existing garage is approximately 13 feet from the existing retaining wall and 18 feet
from the top of the bluff, and therefore does not comply with the current bluff setback
requirements. The applicant is proposing that the garage expansion occur on the north side of
the garage, to maintain the existing setbacks between the garage and the bluff, and the garage
and the road right-of-way.
7
Robinson Variance Staff Report
• Scandia City Council Page 3 June 18, 2013
Accessory Structures
Expansion of the Existinq Nonconforminq Garaqe
Chapter 2, Section 3.2 of the Development Code requires that no detached structure be located
closer to the road right-of-way than the principal building on the lot without a variance, unless
the structure is at least 200 feet from the road right-of-way and the lot is 5 acres or more in size.
The existing garage structure was built before the requirements of the current code were
adopted, and is closer to the road right-of-way than the principal structure. It is therefore a
nonconforming structure. The Development Code Section 13.0 permits replacement of a lawful
conforming structure (Chapter 1, Section13.3 (2 and 3), or expansion of a nonconforming
structure without a variance only for reasons of height, setback or lot size. The apqlicanYs
request for expansion of the qaraqe does not fit those requirements, and therefore requires a
variance.
Request for two accessorv structures
The Development Code permits one accessory structure up to 1,000 square feet on lots
between 3 and 5 acres in size. The Robinson property currently includes the existing garage
(604 square feet) and two sheds (320 square feet and 168 square feet) for a total of 3 existinq
accessory structures and 1,092 square feet. The existinq number and square footaqe of
accessorv structures exceeds the Code requirement.
The applicant is requesting to replace the existing garage with an expanded garage that would
total 988 square feet, and to keep one existing shed that is 320 square feet in size. He is
proposing to remove the second shed. The applicant has made recent investments to improve
the condition of 320-square foot shed, which has a foundation and electric service. The
applicant is requesting a total of 2 accessorv structures and 1,308 sauare feet. His request
would bring the number of accessory structures on the property closer to the number permitted
by the Code. The total square footage of structures would continue to exceed the maximum
allowed by the Code.
The total number and size of accessorv structures proposed would exceed the ordinance
requirements and therefore requires a variance.
Lot Coverage
The Shoreland District allows impervious coverage up to 25%. The Planner estimated that the
lot coverage with the garage expansion would be approximately 5,200 square feet.
The size of the lot is approximately 2.53 acres (110,207 square feet). The proposed lot
coverage with the garage expansion and one accessory structure would be approximately 4.8%.
The propertv would meet the lot coveraqe requirement with the proposed expansion and
retention of the accessorv structure.
Building Height
Based on concept plans included with the application, the proposed new garage will be 18'6"
from the ground surface to the peak of the roof, the same height as the existing structure.
7
Robinson Variance Staff Report
Scandia City Council Page 4 June 18,2013
The ordinance allows a maximum building height of 35' in the General Rural District. The
buildinq meets the ordinance heiqht requirement.
Wastewater Treatment
The proposed expansion does not require additional wastewater treatment on the parcel.
Stormwater Management and Land Alteration
No alteration is proposed in the grades on the site.
The Planner sent the application to the Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District for review
and comment. The District had no comments on the request for the variance.
The City's ordinance requires that the applicants obtain a land alteration and grading permit if
1,000 square feet or more of land area will be disturbed for the proposed expansion. The
applicants should obtain the land alteration and qradinq permit if the land disturbance exceeds
1 000 square feet. The Planner recommends that the existinq retaininq wall and bluff be
protected from impacts durinq construction.
Landscape P/an
No landscape plan is required for the expansion.
CRITERIA FOR VARIANCES AND FINDINGS
Chapter 1, Section 6.0 of the Development Code includes the criteria and required process for
considering variance requests.
Variances may only be granted when the terms of the variance are consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the development
code. The other variance criteria include:
1. The applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the
Development Code.
2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created
by the landowner.
3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.
4. Economic conditions alone shall not constitute practical difficulties.
5. The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
property, or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets, or increase the
danger of fire, or endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property
values within the neighborhood.
6. The required variance is the minimum action required to eliminate the practical difficulty.
7. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight
for solar energy systems.
The applicant is requesting a variance from the Development Code requirements to replace and
expand an existing nonconforming structure, and to permit the number and size of accessory
structures on the property to exceed the development code requirement that lots that are less
than 5.0 acre in size have no more than 1 accessory structure with a total square footage of
1
Robinson Variance Staff Report
Scandia City Council Page 5 June 18, 2013
1,000 square feet. The applicants are requesting to replace the existing garage with a new
garage that is 988 square feet and retain an existing shed that is 320 square feet in size, for a
total accessory structure area of 1,308 square feet. The applicants' rationale for the variance is
the following:
• The applicant indicated that the existing garage structure is more than 60 years old and
in need of replacement. The applicant is proposing to replace the structure and expand
it to the north, so that it maintains the distance from the road right-of-way as the current
nonconforming structure. Moving the garage further from the right-of-way to meet the
ordinance requirement would impact the bluff setback and/or bluff that face Bone Lake.
• The applicant is requesting to keep one of the existing sheds in addition to the garage
expansion, and would remove the second shed. He is proposing to keep the shed that
has been improved in recent years. The applicant indicated that the existing garage and
sheds do not provide sufficient storage for the family's 3 vehicles, recreational vehicles,
and lawn equipment, and that the additional storage space is needed to protect them
from the weather and improve the appearance of the property. The applicant noted that
the existing home is relatively small and does not provide adequate space for storage of
the vehicles and equipment that the applicant currently is storing outside.
PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING AND DISCUSSION
The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing for this application on June 4. Neighbors
spoke in support of granting the variance. Based on the Commission's site visit, they noted that
there is no suitable location for the garage on the property that would meet the ordinance
requirements without impacting bluffs or steep slopes. The Commission concluded that the
request meets the criteria for granting a variance.
Findings
The following bullets present the Planning Commission's findings related to the Robinson
request for a variance, based on the statutory criteria for granting a variance. Each of the
criteria is shown in italics:
• Variances shall only be permitted when lhey are in harmony with the general purposes
and intent of the official control.
Variance to replace the qaraqe. Granting the requested variance to replace the existing
garage is in harmony with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan and
Development Code based on the following:
• The proposed use of the parcels for a single-family residence and accessory
structure is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan goals and policies for
the General Rural District and Shoreland Overlay District.
• Protecting bluffs and providing a setback from the bluffs is consistent with the
requirements of the Shoreland Overlay District and the goals of the Comprehensive
Plan to protect steep slopes and natural resources. The applicanYs request would
maintain the existing buffer area between the garage and the retaining wall and bluff.
Requiring the new garage to be constructed farther from the road right-of-way to
meet the Development Code requirement would impact the existing retaining wall
and bluff area. Construction of the garage in another location on the property that
7
Robinson Variance Staff Report
Scandia City Council Page 6 June 18,2013
would meet the ordinance requirement would impact other slopes and existing
vegetation.
Variance to exceed number and size of accessorv structures. The Development Code
permits 1 accessory structure up to 1,000 square feet in size on lots that are between 3
and 5 acres in size. The number and square footage of accessory structures on the
property currently exceeds the Code requirements (3 structures, 1092 square feet).
Keeping the existing 320-foot shed in addition to the expansion would bring the number
of accessory structures closer to the Code requirement. The square footage would
continue to exceed the ordinance requirement.
• The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner under the
conditions allowed by official control(s).
Single Family Residences and accessory structures are reasonable uses in the General
Rural District and Shoreland Overlay District.
• The practical difficulties are not caused by the landowner, and are unique to the
property.
Variance to replace the qaraqe. The practical difficulties related to replacing the existing
garage in a location that would meet the ordinance requirements are caused by the
location of the existing garage structure in relationship to the retaining wall, bluff, home,
and road right-of-way, and the condition of the structure. The potential for replacing the
garage on the property in a location that would meet the ordinance requirement are
limited by the location of slopes, the existing home, existing trees and setbacks. The
applicant did not create the practical difficulties and they are unique to the property.
Variance to exceed number and size of accessorv structures. The current landowner did
not create the number and size of accessory structures on the property—it is a
nonconforming situation created by a previous landowner.
• The variance would not alter the essential character of the area.
The applicants' home is adjacent to other residential structures with accessory buildings.
The neighbor to the south has a garage that is also closer to the road right-of-way than
the primary structure. The proposed garage expansion and continuation of one
additional accessory structure would not alter the essential character of the area.
• Economic conditions alone shall not constitute practical difficulties.
Variance to replace the qaraqe. The practical difficulties for the garage replacement are
caused by the condition of the existing garage, and the location of the garage in relation
to the road right-of-way, retaining wall, slopes, and existing home. It is not based on
economic conditions alone.
Variance to exceed number and size of accessorv structures The applicant indicated
that the need for expansion of the structure and maintaining one of the existing
accessory structures is based on the need to store vehicles, recreational vehicles and
1
Robinson Variance Staff Report
Scandia City Council Page 7 June 18,2013
other typical household equipment such as a lawn tractor. The existing garage and
accessory buildings do not provide enough space to shelter the vehicles and equipment.
The house is modest in size and does not provide storage space for vehicles or lawn
equipment. Some of the vehicles and equipment are stored outside now, and are visible
to neighbors. The request is based in part on a need to protect the vehicles and
equipment from the weather and maintain the neat appearance of the property. The
difficulties are not related solely to economic conditions.
• The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacenf
property, or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets, or increase the
danger of fire, or endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property
values within the neighborhood.
The proposed variance will not impair the supply of light or air to adjacent properties.
The property will remain as a single-family residential use and will not increase
congestion or endanger public safety. The location and number of accessory structures
on the property is similar to other properties in the neighborhood.
• The required variance is the minimum action required fo eliminate the practical difficulty.
Variance to replace the qaraqe. The minimum action to address the practical difficulty
related to the garage location is to construct the new garage in the current location, to
avoid impacts to the bluff and maintain the existing setback from the bluff.
Variance to exceed number and size of accessorv structures. The applicants indicated
that the proposed size of the expansion is the minimum area needed to replace the
existing storage area and provide for the future. The applicant's request would decrease
the number of accessory structures on the property, and bring it into closer conformance
with the Code requirement.
• Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight
for solar energy systems.
The variance is not related to a need for direct sunlight for solar energy systems.
ACTION REQUESTED:
The City Council can take the following actions:
1. Approval
2. Approval with conditions
3. Denial with findings
4. Table the request
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the variance to allow
replacement and expansion of an existing garage structure to a total size of 988 square feet on
1
Robinson Variance Staff Report
Scandia City Council Page 8 June 18, 2013
the property located at 22920 Meadowbrook in a location that maintains at least the existing
setback from the road right-of-way and the existing retaining wall and top of bluff. The
Commission also recommends approval of the request to keep the existing 320 square-foot
accessory structure.
1. The construction of the new garage shall be in substantial compliance with the plans
submitted to the City on May 13, 2013, and shall be constructed no closer to the road
right-of-way than the existing garage.
2. The applicants shall obtain a building permit for the expansion. The second existing
accessory structure (168 square feet) shall be removed before a building permit shall be
approved.
3. Based on the variance granted to exceed the accessory structure size standard, the
owner shall waive the right to construct an additional 120 square-foot accessory
structure permitted by the Development Code on the parcel.
4. The applicants shall obtain a land alteration and grading permit from the City if the area
that will be disturbed for construction exceeds 1,000 square feet. The existing retaining
wall and bluff shall be protected from disturbance during construction.
5. The Applicant shall pay all fees and escrows.
7
CITY OF SCANDIA, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 06-18-13-02
APPROVING A VARIANCE FOR 22920 MEADOWBROOK AVENUE
WHEREAS, Daniel Robinson has made an application for a Variance to allow
replacement and expansion of an existing nonconforming garage to permit the garage to be
constructed closer to the right-of-way of Meadowbrook Avenue than the primary structure, in the
same location as the existing garage, and to expand the garage to include a total 988 square feet;
and to maintain an existing 320 square-foot accessory structure on the property in addition to the
new garage; and
WHEREAS, the property is legally described as follows:
Parcel #1: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 9, Township 32 North, Range 20
West, Washington County, Minnesota, lying southerly of "Line 1" and northerly of "Line 2".
Said "Line 1" and "Line 2" are described as follows:
"Line 1" is described as beginning at the point of intersection of the east line of said
Government Lot 1 with the south line of the North 358 feet of said Government Lot 1; thence
269° 26' 08" assumed azimuth from North, parallel with the north line of said Government Lot 1,
a distance of 227.26 feet; thence 257° 10' 26" a distance of 330 feet; thence 269° 26' 08", a
distance of 47 feet, more or less, to the shareline of Bone Lake and said "Line 1" there
terminating.
"Line 2" is described as beginning at a point on the east line of said Government Lot 1
distant 610.39 feet south of the northeast corner of said Government Lot 1; thence 269° 26' 08",
assumed azimuth from North parallel with the north line of said Government Lot l, a distance of
349.92 feet; thence 357° 36' S2" a distance of 145.77 feet; thence 269° 26' 08" parallel with said
north line of Government Lot 1, a distance of 132 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as "Point
A"; thence continuing 269° 26' 08", a distance of 75 feet, more or less, to the shoreline of Bone
Lake and said "Line 2" there terminating.
Subject to Meadowbrook Avenue North along east line.
(Torrens Certificate No. 51361)
Resolution No.: 06-18-13-02
Page 2 of 3
Parcel #2: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 9, Township 32 North, Range 20
West, Washington County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Commencing at a point of the east line of said Government Lot 1 distant 61039 feet
south of the northeast corner of said Government Lot l; thence 269° 26' 08", assumed azimuth
from North, parallel with the north line of said Government Lot 1, a distance of 349.92 feet;
thence 357° 36' S2" a distance of 145.77 feet; thence 269° 26' 08" parallel with said north line of
Government Lot 1, a distance of 132 feet to the point of beginning of the parcel to be described;
thence 180° 30' 28", 86.77 feet; thence 274° 07' 40", 75 feet, more or less to the shoreline of
Bone Lake; thence northerly along said shoreline to its intersection with a line on an azimuth of
269° 26' 08" from the point of beginning; thence 89° 26' 08", along said line, a distance of 75
feet, more or less, to the point of beginning.
(Abstract Property)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request for the Variance at a duly
noticed Public Hearing on June 4, 2013, and recommended approval of the variance;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SCANDIA, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA, that it should
and hereby does approve the variance to allow replacement and expansion of the existing
nonconforming garage in a location that is the same distance from Meadowbrook Avenue and
the existing top of bluffline (retaining wall) as the existing garage with a total building footprint
of up to 988 square feet, and to allow the existing 320 square-foot accessory structure to remain
on the property, based on the following findings:
1. Granting the requested variance is in harmony with the Comprehensive Plan goals and
policies far the General Rural District and Shoreland Overlay District. Maintaining the
garage in the current location rather than a location that would meet the ordinance
requirement will protect the bluffs and existing retaining walls from impacts. Bluff
protection is consistent with the requirements of the Shoreland Overlay District and
Development Code.
2. The proposed single-family residential use and accessory structures are a reasonable use
of the property under the Development Code.
3. The location of the existing garage structure, retaining wall, bluff and existing residential
structure and the number and size of the existing additional accessory structures were not
created by the landowner and are unique to the property.
4. The proposed expansion is consistent with the essential character of the surrounding
General Rural District.
5. The request is based on the condition of the existing garage; the location of the garage in
relation to the road right-of-way, retaining wall, slopes and existing home; the need to
Resolution No.: 06-18-13-02
Page 3 of 3
shelter vehicles and other equipment; and the desire to maintain a neat appearance; and is
not based on economic conditions alone.
6. The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
properties, substantially increase the congestion of public streets, increase the danger of
fire or endanger public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values in the
neighborhood.
7. The requested variance is the minimum needed to eliminate the practical difficulties. The
removal of one existing accessory structure will reduce the total number of accessory
structures and bring the property into closer compliance with that Development Code
requirement.
8. The practical difficulty was not related to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar
energy systems; and
FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED, that the following conditions of approval shall be met:
1. The construction of the new garage shall be in substantial compliance with the plans
submitted to the City on May 13, 2013, and shall be constructed no closer to the road
right-of-way than the existing garage.
2. The applicants shall obtain a building permit for the expansion. The second existing
accessory structure (168 square feet) shall be removed before a building permit shall be
approved.
3. Based on the variance granted to exceed the accessory structure size standard, the owner
shall waive the right to construct an additional 120 square-foot accessory structure
permitted by the Development Code on the parcel.
4. The applicants shall obtain a land alteration and grading permit from the City if the area
that will be disturbed for construction exceeds 1,000 square feet. The existing retaining
wall and bluff shall be protected from disturbance during construction.
5. The Applicant shall pay all fees and escrows.
Adopted by the Scandia City Council this 18th day of June, 2013.
Randall Simonson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kristina Handt, Administrator/Clerk
� , 7. Brief Description of Request: (uttach.separate sheet if necessary)
_ I am requesting a variance to build a new 988 sq.ft.garage. The existing 60 plus year old garage, is in —
_ need of many repairs, and does not meet the current code to be set back from the road farther than the
house.The existing garage will be removed, and the new garage built in the old footprint,the same
— distance to the road, only wider to the North by 16 feet. Approximately 10 feet behind the existing
_ garage is a concrete retaining wall, and a sharp drop off. Moving the new garage farther back would be —
_ very difficult. Having multiple vehicles, one or more is always parked in the driveway or yard.
_ I am also requesting a variance to keep one of our existing sheds.The property currently has 2 —
_ nonconforming sheds. I will remove one.The other stores our lawn equipment,atv,snowmobile,and
boating equipment.Without this shed, most of these would have to be kept outside. Our house is very "
— small, extra storage is greatly needed. —
8. Project Name:
o S,•,...� — .�'.JJ�-�"l�j�
I hereby apply for consideration of the above described request and declare that the information and materials submitted
with this application are complete and accurate. I understand that no application shall be considered complete unless
accompanied by fees as required by city ordinance. Applications for projects requiring more than one type of review
shall include the cumulative total of all application fees specified for each type of review. I understand that applicants
are required to reimburse the city for aIl out-of-pocket costs incurred for processing,reviewing and hearing the
application.These costs shall include, but are not limited to:parcel searches; publication and mailing of notices;review
by the city's engineering,planning and other consultants; legal costs, and recording fees. An escrow deposit to cover
these costs will be collected by the city at the time of application. The minimum escrow deposit shall be cumulative total
of all minimum escrow deposits for each type of review required for the project,unless reduced as provided for by
ordinance.. The city may increase the amount of the required escrow deposit at any time if the city's costs are reasonably
expected to exceed the minimum amount. Any balance remaining after review is complete will be refunded to the
applicant. No interest is paid on escrow deposits.
PLEASE NOTE: If the fee owner is not the applicant,tbe applicant must provide written authorization by the fee
owner in order for this application to be considered complete.
Property Fe r Signatnre(s) Date:
�-�3-/3
Applicant re(s) Date:
� J� ��� �3
For City Use on�y PAI D
Application Fees: � 1 J � MAY 13 2013
Escrow Deposit: � ,��Q
CITY QF SCANDIA
�
�
t
t
i
�
Z
� .
� �
� N
1 � �
: �,
� "
� � I
� ��N
, �
b
�--�--� �
� f
-� c An �
�
� � �� o
G
R1 �� .
� s� r j
N � I i
S. � f
_ -��
N-"�
� ----� 04
. fV
� �
N
• �3�. �:�i,w.. f�z � �p�¢~ �X:�� �U O
� " ' � s , � e, {`t�� y,. � I 1� V f1
����`�aAw' ~ � .4 � kY � � �� rv# �. �� . I�-.�_ Q.0 Sl .
w �n� .r`, � rt . ` y„ .. t.:� � sr�, �' w a� c'.
.,� �' 7 � . � . � .=3?` y w�` . � ...� �, a � ,�,,,� �'y J F— �' ro
t�l,�syo � ��fi.k�'� J" x - � . '.a ,s a� .��,a -y�y� Z Z o� �
c � �'� .a` �'' k" � f-r: O W Fo� �
. ,�$; ,a� �, ''�a y "'�� . ��, �. a, �I w� o_`";N B
�'i� ..+ ,.tF• .. ' y Pa^� r.:# , '�, .�,'*' �k' '�� i9ii`I;Nf� Z U 10 0� �
P
.'�+`� � �°' 4 s� - t f • W 0 F j Ql VI
��'��_� ,r�.-• �r., �,� ���,�� �` �' F -
`p >.� • � �� W� o� � a�
a� �: � � �" ''� �.` �'� �" �I lL Q L °r v
.a�b. _ .�,Y� �.�� � - •� ; . .;;v� IU �a1Oi� c
�� h s' ,,.�, . :r'.t `i �� U ti-'O Vi
�� � � � � '< . ..�.�� W •�U i.
�, �c, 1� a'J � . t �
�� ,.n'. � >� ','�'"�1 x ,% '� � , 4 i 0 Q 2'� m c�
�. �� +� � � fi �, �,}( H L� .. c
rt ,�. a .�� � �1"� �•� � �.� � -dc`. s � Q z �n�n� tin
' '�r,<'� � �*^ ���. r �'""' ,,� . . r�'` 4 1< i, a� � c o w�v'
� � r � � . �. �� _ `"�``"�� a r I)K �� =- �N �n G�
..»� ,z .�,�� .�'':� - ' �'9� �.�y .s.� �.�jl�c�lll ��W �u
i �� � i .r
Y U
. . . '�` sa a: �) N N u ' @
J 1)] L C —`G
� � � �� 1 h—U U U�
_�wE�� s�� � . . i �#�,.,s� •,Yn �1.'t9).
,.-
.r+ � �� .. � � ..w r g. . ��. " � �n Nj
t �,}� � R ����
.«-w t � ���- `.��� �/�� ~��.� ��� .� # Q�.
M � � m.��� � ,..`�� . � .. , . C `*:
�� ,.. � �. �I�+F�e ��kr 4` '+�`s$�"�rt ;� � � .: »',� ��
4
�n ✓r ��4" � ,+ `$ l/J �
� �..di. �_rr, . ? � f) .l
.. � ,u� k� . �,� � �` .� (` j!
. � ,�,.�. '. �.
�i� � p � 3. � ^k '4� Nd\J
. � + � �i1 �^^ g�r� sl 1� �il�y f�,�g. `1t �7 �
. I''� S it1."{� '"" : �� ~"�j,,
�� � , � � � ,,�`c�' ,st`".� "`i ��q'�� .. a..�a�cs ,�ri i,,�, Q�' :
.� � _ { � �, n��''
' `�' y,". '"`°t�„ r} <�., a)F =
;Y�� � � �.x w�. � "� 8 '�,' a,� .. � �,�,
� ,�' �� �i v t���
.�, -�� ,. �n '��4 �,+�G� � � �
�� ',��t ��,y �� .. (l D?
ka `.. � {�Y
� �l�,.y�, { t� � ,ss '�' +�,x�`ti�
' �• �w��� �� �y�g� �� i'ci �.
� ' � "'�"� a v ♦ n
s Ir� � '� m�P� cl
y ��.'. •� � ^` ,s",,�F n• ��� ' �"ss' "� � '.. .. � ��x�..� ���_ll�
a i, � � �� � �. � �
.. y'� ,'rt.^' � � %w k ,q��� �J��F'o� ��� 7�4*t'° T��. .
. . �
,�£ r � �
�y4,' � M � �� ��,.f' l� r B�, ' ,'k_
wap��� . � �`� ■ . ,..�rak
� � ^�, � r^� &* �°��V� 1Y$s�. r� i 4' ��.. y,�.
. � .�'� �' . . � ���a*. � �d 's � .. -;4 �
� ..F• �' t ������ � S>�.• a - ^,y,�i'n
� �� � �� ; �
wj�� s •
li �
�'� S `.rv $ � j�., yM � . � �� ^'4 q , �. !
_ s
•s• Y#�� .� .-� . r,.�
y, � t�✓_4.. } ���:s� 'L �r ,� rt� � ��A �i. ,�*.
,� .��T�i r � ,4» . 3 w �„_ k . `$-�'3 � � "'�y �.+^n
'��"1�•�'',� •. �' .�.�....� wM� a ,�..'�^ "de
� � � '� . ':, t. �m� �, we^
� �g g .. � � ,±1� ��� -0��:
, ,ry��� s,� �`N.��§� ��_ Q
° � , �, r�-,� �, Q
� ze � r� �,�" "�zy�` ,�ri"������ . .�'., (n
�+w , � t
r.
s • °f"�� ° `� �r,.,1-' . ��Ik� LL
y,� �x �'� ��'� -s a� � �,� � �' � �
�°� ,+�y,:�, �' il�, .�� i� .� r �-. I �
�'�'-a �+r� ,�. �a V� . , „�y' '��.»�;: . . �."
Y
� .
_ , ,'
�.. � a
�,�, �� �,' U
F #�' ���� . .r�" �.��
fi^-. et 'W^'a' „�q s`,�•^ ��. Z
,r A
<— �
('� Q
o Y
o �
� � " °
M
O � � �,j O
'►►f1� j�j C�
V.�� � � Q �
:�U .. � W �
o Q � o
a
� U � � i�
� ��� �
d a. N C�
' < � • a
� 3 �
: ` o
> J ••
, Z � � �r
' � Ol9 ______ -� ¢ " °° o
� �� m „ N
L � � m ` ~
� z� � � , � � �
. � � N
^� J`{ - -
: � r-' ,�+ u
� �
� . �
; -- - �J � � � �
� J� a
=D "_ ` _'`�_ �) � v� = i
: � � � C aF y
f0 � V ��
° . = � � � �` � �
�
� + c� " e
i � c� �
f U
n N � Oj i 3
) � �M t o
� Q S t v
M � ^ d
) � L ,� e
� � �
� � � � a C
� 3 � �
�
� p u
O' � a Z
� ,Y d� Ot
' .�n u�i lJ Ti 7
b C
� T 'S� u
� 3 � � �
g � W
3 �I � �
f L V
a L1.5b� .�� � � � ,: m � �' 3 �, _ J
g � ^ = t '^ � y -� m
j SlL ¢ z 3 s _ d
; :: 3
�
� � � `-
q ' u L A '
? �
� � % x m c m
v "
N � 3 � � e o
M M SS(i' � '" � � ,� � i; o.^ � .
� � o a p a f
(� � a
s�t J E�`(�,1 n a J O C
O ..
m �
C
l(') o �i $ �
� � a
m
� c
r+ ,�
� ` �b � �
+ - �
� 5_ �
� � w
^ ^ Ofi a � �
1 �
� � � s
Y ]
� � m m
� P
O d
� ' �
� a V
L
♦ I ` ~°
o a' �
±_ _� �� � u N � �
. �
N
N
� • N
LL �
�} �
F' X
U
� �
u a a
� Y O �
u o $ z �
> � a �
m �
>, 0 3
.� r q O
Z � ' O � �
� �^'' r � � t
L. � ��.. � O �
� N �
+� ��� d N
� f rv
7 � ',•
� j ii, a
3
�
a
n c"'
y C
� ' � - ' � Paelof4
�Design # 51260 � _ • �
- �� 51112013
Items Selected: Options Selected: FrontView
Gable room in a�ic roof wl�12 pitch trusses 2'O.C. The options you have selected are:
Truss Design location Zip Cotle:5�073 30 LB Roof Felt --�'-�
314'T&G OSB RIA Floor Shealhing 2 Rows Granular Ice&Water Bamer ��
�
Pa�ical Board Slair Tread-42" 1�36z80 Service Door—CM16-Panel Sieel RS
, �
2z6 Wall Framing Ma�erial 3•9z8 Overheatl Door•Insulated RP White _
26'Wide X 38'Deep X 9'High
6'6"Hz12'WRIARoomSite
Ivory 8'Smartlap Lap Siding
Wicker Rocker Sma�Trim Outside Comers Back Uiew
112'OSB Wall Sheathing
Nova Wrap ,
12°gablell2"eave overhangs '
518'OSB Roof Sheathing '
Castlebrook,Wea�hered Wood Shir�les �� (
Slanl Back Vent(Metal),Black
White Aluminum Sof�t&Fascia
White Premium Roof Etlge
White Vinyl Overhead Door Jamb
foday's estimated base price: $6,621.44 Today's estimated price; $12,896.55
The base price includes:0'Eave10'Gable Overhangs,Framing Materials, If urchased toda
lh6 OSB Roof Sheathing,20 yr,Fiberglass Classic•Onyx p y, y0U SaU2; $574.12
Black Shingles,Pine Fascia,Gafvaniz�Regular Roof Edge,
g°Teztured Ver�ical Hardboard Siding,No SeMce�oors, Monthly BIG Card payment: $408.28
No Overhead Doas,No Wintlows,or Any aher Options.
Jobsite delivery may be required for trusses.
'�Take this sheet to the Building Materials counter to purchase your materials, �`
�tl inlormatlon on th�fam,other than price,has been prwicied by guesl and Menards is not responsible for any errors in the iniorma6on on ris estimate,inck�ding but noI kmited to quanliry,dmensan and quali�.Please ezarnine
his esfmate carek�lly.MENARDS MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS,ORAL,WRITTEN OR OTHERWISE,THAT THE MATERIALS LISTED ARE SUITABLE FOR ANY PURPOSE BEING CONSIDERED BY ThfE GUEST.
3ECAUSE OF THE WIDE VAAIATIONS IN CODES,THERE ARE NO REPRESENTATIONS THAT THE MATERIALS LISTED HEREIN MEET YOUR CODE REQUIREMENTS.
� � - ' Pa e2of4
Desi n # 51260 r• = o ,
9 ��
��� , , , 51112013
Here arethewall configurations for your design,
Illustration May Not Depict All Options Selected
� � �
_ o
�
�
22� t' 26'
�xF�:
aable Front View
;1)•CM•1 EPANEL STEEL DOOR 36X80 RH PH
❑D�❑❑ ❑O❑�❑ ❑O❑0�
❑o❑oo ❑aoo❑� ❑o❑o❑
❑D❑C(� ❑OOO❑ ❑��❑❑
❑ooa❑ aaoo❑ ❑0000
-7- 9'X 8' �2' 9'X 8' 2' 9'X 8' S' 38' ___---------__________-------
=ave Front View Eave Back View
3)•9X8 WHITE INSUL RAISEDPNLEZSETTORSN M4SV
iuilding Size:26 feet wide X 38 feet long X 9 feet high
►pprozimate Peak Height:l8 feet 6 inches(222 inches)
�enards provided matenal estimates are intended as a general construction aitl and have been calculatetl using typical construction methotls.Because ot ihe wide vanable in
�otles and site restnc6ons,all final plans and material lisfs must be veri�etl wilh your local zo�ing office,architect antllor builder for building design ar�code compliance.
Vlenards is a supplier of construction materials antl tloes not assume liability for tlesign,eng�neenng or thee compleleness of any matenal lists provided, U�derground electrical,
�hone antl gas lines should be located antl marked before your building plans are finalized,Remember to use safety equipment mcluding dusi masks and sight and hea�ng
�roiection during construction to ensure a positive building experience,
' ' Pa e3of4
�Desi n # 51260 • = � - �
9 ��
t�� 51112013
Garage Floor Plan,
Illustration May Not Depict All Options Selected
_ . __ _
_ _ 36, _ _ __ _ .. - -
_.___
___ ��
3'x 6'•8"
26'
22'
_�� _---____ - 9'x 8� _ __ _ _ 2� _.-- _ -----g�X g� -- -- . 2� __ ------g,X 8� _ __-_ ---5�---�
3uilding Size:26 feet wide X 38 feet long X 9 feet high
Jote:Wall constructi�n is 2z6 @ 16"on center