Loading...
7.b)2) TKDA Memo-Krueger Variance Application " �1 .b� �.� ,��.4 �;�, aaa c�ao�sveec.s�ce,soo Saint Paul,MN 55101 651.292.4400 � tkda.com TKDA Memorandum To: Scandia City Council Reference: Krueger Variance Application, Kristina Handt, City City of Scandia Administrator Copies To: John Krueger, Applicant Project No.: 15253.016 From: Sherri Buss, RLA AICP, Routing: Planner Date: July 3, 2013 SUBJECT: Krueger Variance Application MEETING DATE: July 16, 2013 LOCATION: 12199 205th Street North Scandia, Minnesota APPLICANTS: John Krueger ZONING: General Rural District and Shoreland Zone 60-DAY PERIOD: August 10, 2013 ITEMS REVIEWED: Application and Plan received June 10, 2013 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST: The applicant is seeking to build a swimming pool and hot tub between the existing home on the property and Big Marine Lake. The proposed location for the pool is within the required structure setback from the lake. The parcel includes 5.09 acres. The property is located in the General Rural (GR) District and within the Shoreland Zone of Big Marine Lake, a Recreational Development Lake. DETAILED EVALUATION OF THE VARIANCE REQUEST: Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan indicates that the General Rural District includes areas of mixed lot sizes, and will continue to do so. Single-family residential uses, including accessory uses, are An employee owned company promoting affirmative oction and equal opportunity Krueger Variance Staff Report Scandia City Council Page 2 July 16, 2013 supported in the GR District. The plan recommends that the General Rural Area be developed at a maximum density of four dwelling units per 40 acres, with a minimum allowed lot size of 2 acres. The Shoreland Overlay District also permits single-family residences and accessory structures. The proposed use of the propertv is consistent with the qeneral qoals of the Comprehensive Plan for the General Rural District and Shoreland Overlay District. Deve/opment Code Requirements: Lot Size and Setbacks The applicants' lot includes 5.09 acres. The General Rural District requires a minimum lot size of 2.0 acres, and the Shoreland Overlay District requires that existing lots on Recreational Development Lakes such as Big Marine Lake meet the lot size requirements of the underlying district. The lot meets the lot size requirement. The required setbacks in the Shoreland Overlay District for Big Marine Lake (a Recreational Development Lake) include the following: • Right-of-Way Line of a Public Street: 40 feet • Side: 10 feet • Structure setback from the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL): 100 feet The applicant is proposinq to locate the swimminq pool structure approximately 60 feet from the OHWL of the lake. The proposed hot tub is located closer to the lake than the pool on the concept plan. The proposed swimminq pool structure and hot tub require a variance. The proposed structures meet the side lot line and right-of-way setback requirements. The applicant reviewed other options for potential location of the structures. Sites that would meet the setback requirement from the OHWL are occupied by the home, driveway, and the primary and secondary septic fields. A location to the east of septic area #2 (shown on attached plan) would be a long distance from the house, limiting view of the pool and creating safety concerns, and would require the removal of existing trees. Preservation of natural vegetation is a goal in the Shoreland Overlay District. Accessory Structures The Development Code allows one non-agricultural accessory structure up to 720 square feet in size on lots less than 1 acre in size. The property includes one existing shed. No new accessory structures are proposed with the variance application. The proposed plan meets the accessorV structure requirements. Lot Coverage The Shoreland District allows impervious coverage up to 25% of the area of the parcel that is above the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL). The applicant did not provide an analysis of lot coverage with the application. The Planner utilized the Washington County aerial photo of the property to determine the approximate lot coverage of the existing structures and hard surfaces. The current lot coverage is approximately .6 acres, or 12 percent, of the area above the OHWL. The addition of the pool would increase the coverage to approximately 12.5 percent. The proqosed lot coveraqe is within the ordinance requirement. 1 Krueger Variance Staff Report Scandia City Council Page 3 July 16, 2013 Building Height No new buildings are proposed. Wastewater Treatment The proposed expansion does not require additional wastewater treatment on the parcel. Stormwater Management and Land Alteration No alteration is shown in the grades on the site, and no grading plan was included with the application. However, construction of the pool structure and hot tub will require grading to create a flat area. Areas to the south and east of the pool include significant slopes. While the slopes do not meet the definition of"bluffs" or "steep slopes" in the Shoreland District regulations, care will be required to avoid creating steep or unstable slopes when the pool area is graded. The Planner sent the application to the Carnelian-Marine Watershed District and the Minnesota DNR for review and comment. District staff noted that it is likely that the proiect will reauire Watershed District Permits for bluffs, stormwater manaqement and erosion control, and the conditions require that the applicants obtain anv required permits from the District. The City's ordinance requires that the applicants obtain a land alteration and grading permit if 1,000 square feet or more of land area will be disturbed for the proposed pool and hot tub. The applicant should obtain the land alteration and qradinq permit if the land disturbance exceeds 1 000 square feet. The Planninq Commission included a condition that the applicant shall submit the qradinq plan for the site to the City for approval bv the City Enqineer before a buildinq permit maY be issued. Landscape Plan and Tree Rep/acement Requirements No landscape plan is required for the expansion. The Minnesota DNR staff suggested that the City could consider requiring screening for the proposed pool if noise or activity is likely to impact other lakeshore owners. Some mature trees may need to be removed to construct the pool structure and hot tub. The Shoreland Overlay District regulations do not allow removal of healthy trees over six (6) inches in diameter at a point fifty-four inches above ground level (dbh) within the required building setback without replacement. The applicant will be required to submit a tree replacement plan that identifies anv healthy trees that are qroposed for removal within the setback area that are over 6 inches dbh and proposed replacement trees (1:1 replacement). The plan must be a�proved bv Citv staff before a buildina permit mav be issued. CRITERIA FOR VARIANCES AND FINDINGS Chapter 1, Section 6.0 of the Development Code includes the criteria and required process for considering variance requests. Variances may only be granted when the terms of the variance are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the development code. The other variance criteria include: 1. The applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Development Code. 7 Krueger Variance Staff Report Scandia City Council Page 4 July 16, 2013 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. 4. Economic conditions alone shall not constitute practical difficulties. 5. The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets, or increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. 6. The required variance is the minimum action required to eliminate the practical difficulty. 7. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. The applicant is requesting a variance from the Shoreland Overlay District regulations to place a swimming pool and hot tub within the required structure setback from Big Marine Lake. The required setback is 100 feet. The structure is proposed to be located approximately 60 feet from the OHWL. The applicanYs variance rationale is that the proposed location is the only potential location due to location of existing buildings, driveway and septic system on the parcel, the need to have the pool reasonably close to the home, and the goal to maintain existing vegetation on the property. The current owner did not create those conditions. Findings The following bullets present the Planner's findings related to the Krueger request for a variance, based on the statutory criteria for granting a variance. Each of the criteria is shown in italics: • Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the official control. The Comprehensive Plan supports single-family residential uses in the General Rural District and Shoreland District. Accessory structures such as swimming pools are permitted in the GR District and Shoreland District. The proposed use is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan. • The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner under the conditions allowed by official control(s). Single Family Residences and accessory structures are reasonable uses in the General Rural District and Shoreland Overlay District. • The practical difficulties are not caused by the landowner, and are unique to the property. The proposed location of the pool is based on the location of the existing home, driveway and septic system, the desire to have the pool within a reasonable distance from the home and viewable from the home for safety. Constructing the pool in a vacant location that could meet the setback requirement from the OHWL would require removal of existing trees, which conflicts with Shoreland Overland District goals to preserve 7 Krueger Variance Staff Report Scandia City Council Page 5 July 16,2013 natural vegetation. The practical difficulties were not caused by the landowner and are unique to the existing development and vegetation on the property. • The variance would not alter the essential character of the area. The applicants' home is near other residential structures that have a variety of accessory structures. The proposed use would not alter the essential residential character of the area. • Economic conditions alone shall not constitute practical difficulties. The practical difficulties are related to the shape of the existing lot, location of existing structures, septic system and vegetation. The practical difficulties are not only economic in nature. • The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets, or increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. The proposed variance will not impair the supply of light or air to adjacent properties. It will not increase congestion, endanger the public, or substantially diminish or impair property values in the neighborhood. • The required variance is the minimum action required to eliminate the practical difficulty. The proposed pool structure will be 60 feet from the OHWL. The hot tub should be relocated to maintain at least the same 60-foot setback from the OHWL. Some separation is needed between the pool and the other structures and septic system, so the proposed location provides as much separation from the lake as possible without impacting other structures. The variance is the minimum action needed to eliminate the practical difficulty. • Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. The variance is not related to a need for direct sunlight for solar energy systems. PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING AND DISCUSSION The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the application at its July 2�d meeting. Neighbors noted concerns about potential impacts of lighting and noise on surrounding properties. The Planning Commission discussed those concerns, noted that the lack of a certificate of survey made evaluation of setback and slope issues difficult, and noted concerns about potential slope impacts as the area is graded to accommodate the pool. They also concluded that the hot tub should be relocated so that it meets the same setback as the pool, as there is ample area available around the pool structure to relocate the hot tub and maintain as much of the lake setback as possible. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance and added conditions related to the following issues: 1 Krueger Variance Staff Report Scandia City Council Page 6 July 16,2013 • Require a certificate of survey to verify setbacks before approval of the building permit. • Require that the hot tub be relocated to maintain the same setback as the pool. • Require that light sources be focused on the pool and not reflect light onto surrounding properties. • Require that the applicant maintain the existing screening between the pool and the lake, and replace any trees lost to meet the Shoreland Overlay District requirements. • Require that the applicant submit a grading plan for review by the City Engineer before a building permit may be approved. ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council can recommend the following: 1. Approval 2. Approval with conditions 3. Denial with findings 4. Table the request PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the proposed variance from the required setback from the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) of Big Marine Lake to allow construction of the proposed swimming pool structure and hot tub at 12199 205th Street North at a minimum of 60 feet from the OHWL. The Planning Commission recommends the following conditions for the variance: 1. The location of the pool structure and hot tub shall be in general compliance with the sketch plan submitted to the City on June 10, 2013. The applicant shall relocate the hot tub to be at least 60 feet from the OHWL. The variance allows construction of a swimming pool structure and hot tub no closer than 60 feet from the OHWL of Big Marine Lake. 2. The applicant shall submit a certificate of survey to the City for review and approval before a building permit may be approved. 3. The applicant's surveyor shall survey and stake the location of the proposed pool structure and hot tub for review and approval by the building inspector before construction begins. 4. The applicant shall submit a grading plan to the City for approval by the City Engineer before a building permit may be approved. 5. The applicant shall maintain the existing screening between the pool structure and the lake to the extent feasible. If any healthy trees within the setback area that are more than six (6) inches in diameter measured at a point fifty-four inches above ground level are proposed for removal to construct the pool structure and hot tub, the applicant shall complete a landscape plan that shows the trees proposed for removal and replacement trees, and obtain the City's approval of the plan before the building permit may be approved. 1 Krueger Variance Staff Report Scandia City Council Page 7 July 16, 2013 6. The applicant shall obtain a Building Permit and Land Alteration Permit from the City prior to construction of the swimming pool and hot tub. 7. The applicant shall obtain the required Watershed District permits for buffers and for storm water management and erosion control, and provide a copy of the approved permits to the City. 8. The applicant shall locate and focus any lighting for the pool area on the pool and deflect light away from surrounding residential properties. 9. The Applicant shall pay all fees and escrows. 7 CITY OF SCANDIA, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 07-16-13-01 APPROVING A VARIANCE FOR 12199 205T" STREET NORTH WHEREAS,John Krueger has made an application for a Variance to allow construction of swimming pool structure and hot tub approximately 60 feet from the ordinary high water level of Big Marine Lake, which does not meet the required 100-foot structure setback from the OHWL; and WHEREAS, the property is legally described as follows: Lot 3, Block 1, Maxwill Bay Subdivision; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request for the Variance at a duly noticed Public Hearing on July 2, 2013 and recommended approval of the Variance; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCANDIA, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the variance to allow construction of a swimming pool structure and hot tub a minimum of 60 feet from the Ordinary High Water Level of Big Marine Lake based on the following findings: 1. Granting the requested variance is in harmony with the Comprehensive Plan goals and policies for the General Rural District and Shoreland Overlay District. 2. The proposed single-family residential use and structures are a reasonable use of the property under the Development Code. 3. The proposed location of the pool is based on the location of the existing home, driveway and septic system, the desire to have the pool within a reasonable distance from the home and viewable from the home for safety, and the goal to preserve existing natural vegetation on the property. These practical difficulties were not caused by the landowner and are unique to the property. Resolution No.: 07-16-13-01 Page 2 of 3 4. The proposed expansion is consistent with the essential character of the surrounding General Rural District and Shoreland Overlay District. 5. The practical difficulties are related to the shape of the existing lot, the location of the existing home and septic system, and the goal to preserve existing natural vegetation. The practical difficulties are not due to economic conditions alone. 6. The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties, substantially increase the congestion of public streets, increase the danger of fire or endanger public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values in the neighborhood. 7. The requested variance is the minimum needed to maintain as much separation as possible from the lake as well as from the existing buildings and septic system, while providing a reasonable location for the pool. 8. The practical difficulty was not related to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems; and FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED, that the following conditions of approval shall be met: 1. The location of the pool structure and hot tub shall be in general compliance with the sketch plan submitted to the City on June 10, 2013. The applicant shall relocate the hot tub to be at least 60 feet from the OHWL. The variance allows construction of a swimming pool structure and hot tub no closer than 60 feet from the OHWL of Big Marine Lake. 2. The applicant shall submit a certificate of survey to the City for review and approval before a building permit may be approved. 3. The applicant's surveyor shall survey and stake the location of the proposed pool structure and hot tub for review and approval by the building inspector before construction begins. 4. The applicant shall submit a grading plan to the City for approval by the City Engineer before a building permit may be approved. 5. The applicant shall maintain the existing screening between the pool structure and the lake to the extent feasible. If any healthy trees within the setback area that are more than six (6) inches in diameter measured at a point fifty-four inches above ground level are proposed for removal to construct the pool structure and hot tub, the applicant shall complete a landscape plan that shows the trees proposed for removal and replacement trees, and obtain the City's approval of the plan before the building permit may be approved. Resolution No.: 07-16-13-01 Page 3 of 3 6. The applicant shall obtain a Building Permit and Land Alteration Permit from the City prior to construction of the swimming pool and hot tub. 7. The applicant shall obtain the required Watershed District permits for buffers and for storm water management and erosion control, and provide a copy of the approved permits to the City. 8. The applicant shall locate and focus any lighting for the pool area on the pool and deflect light away from surrounding residential properties. 9. The Applicant shall pay all fees and escrows. Adopted by the Scandia City Council this 16th day of July, 2013. Randall Simonson, Mayor ATTEST: Kristina Handt, Administrator/Clerk � ."'- 9.�'•+4-'! rti' . �;i� -^s � �'& � �� C7 � � � �! �' *a ��* ''�� . � N N C1 ` �;' ���y��'s. �,y� '��+� ��1/'�M.� (D C�O � �D ''�` �¢.��F �`' '9 � � a � � �� � ��?�'�" '" �� ��� � � � F � 0 o Q p �'. '� ��,' Mr� ^ rn � � i�i � , �a._ ��„�,i ��,r,� � � � • � 2 N N �,. � r„��y{� � Vl � e " qr•, } �V r[ � O a- � � N .. �.'; ' y, a. � W � .� '"' �«.�' ., �"S« /� O Z N �y ������ ' ^� � ��.. _ .�i,� � � .�� , � F+ � � }� ,.�� +� A � � � � � 3f, ,r,. .�, � O Y e¢`W . . �� � '�` . , r , � � O '�. � ,,.,... ,.. ,1� � �r, T � - � a}��, �. ' M� � � r'y'alt,v���,3,� ,�g�.+N�i7'7�q.� r �`��'-' �t'� ., . . . � n 4t s �s �,� ,� ��'�#�����+t�5�s� ��e " � �;f ..,. . . . +'� � ��v�"7 ��Y� ����",�s��-�k :''- � �*► D , �e� `ti '�•�,; ,..�a�++x •r�� �°�' . , �; , a e . . _ ,n „ p „ , , � �� `����� ����. ��� ;�� ����! ��°'"y, `��i f (i� . � ka� j¢ � ,. .f ; ,1R` ��`�.; .,,*�, f � � . - r -C! '�tb '�:.3._ �11`... J� , ,'� �,�� ,;rj'. r ��� i �`r a yr � � � f.!'k � � --�+'ff: � y � n- � �� ��� �_( .. ' Y�, yEa�r�.�" , +� :. t. ' ♦ tr.,. �"�, . � ag, . °�:.sY� j •>�. � '�� � � ��� :,� . �.{ �; .;t� �"' !> �t w � ��< � � � � ��:�� ��: �� p' .�'�t*,. � {� • ,, `+' � �R d'��� .� ',� �,°:'�,N �_',_� �t't,s�_ •U y . �� .y' � •� ,,� � s.'_':�1 � �, �R � .C��' �LL '��,�•2 - y;}.�Ir.' �j' � . �`�Y ' .. � ���j . � •n '`�. .r " . � . ♦ �r }}� t' L '._ a w \ `f�. .,__ .. . .`� _ � �.w 1 . �U'/� � �iR� ���«Ats_ � *'k � Z' . t _ (p O OY a : k �r. # � c + - �� I N n �. rn N�} t '�+�� ��� (L]' � �� i���m .���� �_ �, �° ���. . �� � �. , ' � ; � �� .. � , *.�" " ^„r,� 6 N p� �� ^F . � S R � �� � y ; . . ��-Q �_ T �94�w .�+`, �' ����,y°� .'♦. 'J/" '. i'�� . � � ' '�„ �F i, i ,�`' ,M,� � ; . z 3 � " " .l � ''�v ��,' � q � . ..wt .�1 ♦.4� � � aj'.' , o D�- j �� -°' �?�. v a+ `,F' r. �, . s �,'s3 � ' t: . . , , �s.. G� � -1 . f "' ` S '. , j.k,.'.�.K �__ � �, _- �-� � rn� � �-._ - �.�iv �: fI'.... „_... �` �� �. � ' . .. „e; 'w'°"� _ � �„`"�.� '�� �.''aM � �� f ,. - W � � � � � �, ,� , i'�► ��d� -., � . � �. '�, ����� .�� _ �`o ;�`�''"� r ;►.• *.�}� ��I r ` : , � a. � o �� , ` ; � ` �.�. '��7 �� 1 i� �K �f . �� .� ��N �e � �M;;� -� j�`��,��5♦ � , '4. n m j'd� "'�r,�"� a ,,� , � , � �,.s " ����°� � � � � � � � m� �s. ,�, m'. �,�a�;� �� +� ,.«�� „S p• � �„ �I I r.'r �� .�"' .. . ., n.. !,� �K L'a) � i' ., �o 0 0 � '� �'� ��� ��/ • ��� n n � � z ����� ��� .. �r +•ys���`:. v co e �r, � ,�,_ m?�� �� °.� n� � '.:*i ' '..'r..�.���' �'r�-� . ,,.. �; ��-� ��.1 t� N � o� �� D � � � .� d � 1 � �vn, v; ZD � � z �" ': 7 —,. � � � � � � � � .�-(� m �� Y �� y t.^-.. '_�;! y. �t0 �N D � � �1�UYY� . .. i'. a^'�Me�' Y' / N O � �TN� � �� � � � '� � v,� � ' �- �„ � '�►, � y�Q a o � .'Z1 . � � ' ,. .,�«.�.�.;a � ...�•�";� �. � y m � � ,. ' �°' � � � ,��!h" rf :� �,z� 1 �� � o � � a ,� �,�s :�, :� i� �` :� � ," aa� � pm ' , ` . 0 0� n Z t�n ,N f�N�� ' ��� '' '� y N � C n � ��.. p�`� � � Rl � t. �;,Sa,��A ��� ry�� v +F.'b�+�,,1y � ?o. 2 Z - R"g �,�""` ,��� � m� � r' .. , z;,a. y i'1�� J ��. } � :. �.o o� � � — _ ..w ..�.� �!i' �.. r: c � p � � i x � '..j -� �n �� _ .� •� �- , � - ;� N � � x �o ;y.�"'�� ��� � '� �"� �� ,�i 7. Brief Description of Request: (attach sepurute sheet if necessary) - s� .f/��l���f 8. Project Name: / / ��( � /ju��l�� I hereby apply for consideration of the above described request and declare that the information and materials submitted with this application are complete and accuratc. I understand that no application shall be considered complete unless accompanied by fees as required by city ordinance. Applications for projccts requiring more than one type of review shall include the cumulative total of all application fees specified for each type of review. I understand that applicants are required to reimburse the city for all out-of-pocket costs incurred for processing, reviewing and hearing the application. These eosts shall include,but are not limited to: parcel searches; publication and mailing of notices;review by the cit��'s engineering,planning and other consultants; legal costs,and recording fees. An escrow deposit to cover these costs will be collected by the city at the time of application. The minimum escrow deposit shall be cumulative total of all minimum escrow deposits for each type of review required for the project,unless reduced as provided for by ordinance. The city may inerease the amount of the required escro«�deposit at any time if the city�s costs are reasonably expected to exceed the minimum amount. Any balance remaining after review is complete will be refunded to the applicant. No interest is paid on escrow deposits. PLEASE NOTE: If the fee owner is not the applicant, the applicant must provide written authorization by the fee owner in order for this application to be considered complete. Property Fee Owner Sign re(s) Date: ��� � �o z0,�3 � Applicant Sign urc(s) Date: For City Use Only Application Fees: � I SD JUN 1 12013 Escrow Deposit: � 3 � 5 GTY OF SCANDIA APPLICATION FOR PIANNING AND ZONING REQUEST,DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: 1 was planning on having a 25x50 foot pool and 8x8 foot hot tub installed in my yard facing the lake. I have discussed this proposal with Sherri Buss, RLA,AICP. Please see the diagram which was included with this application. The reasons for requesting a pool and hot tub within 100 feet of the high water mark are: 1. The high water mark is at elevation 942.2. This is very old high water mark on this lake that was determined before the water outlet was installed on the south end of the lake. Due to this water outlet, it is no longer possible for the water level to ever reach this level again. 2. The site for the pool is still 60 feet away from the high water mark. The hot tub would be approximately 10 feet away from the pool. The hot tub would be at the same elevation as the pool. 3. The pool and hot tub elevation is a lot higher than the water level and the high water mark;they would be 12.8 feet higher than the high water mark(955 pool elevation-942.2). Therefore,we would not have to worry about the lake water level ever affected the pool/hot tub. Also,the actual water lake level since we have lived at this residence is 80-100 feet further than the high water mark. We have never seen it get closer than to the high water mark than this. 4. The elevation of the pool/hot tub location is not 20 feet above the high water mark,so there would be no problems with set backs from bluff issues/concerns. {if it was 20 feet or more, bluff set back would be a concern). 5. It would be ecstatically looking to have the house's large windows and large deck facing the pool on this side lake of the house. Plus,we would not want a pool facing the road. 6. On the south side of the house is a septic system. On the north side of the house is a driveway and another septic system. Beyond that,to the north it is heavily wooded lot. We are trying to preserve some of the trees on the property. There are not many trees between the house and the lake. So the proposed location for the pool/hot tub would be the best location to avoid trees on the property. Also, I believe the pool must be 20 feet from any septic or drain field. This would make the proposed location for pool and hot tub even more appropriate. 7. The hard/impervious cover requirements would not be an issue for this pool/hot tub since the property is located on 7.75 acres. 8. Also the property is long and skinny,with a road way on one side and the lake on the other side. The proposed location for the pool is at the widest part of the property(widest area between the road and the lake). 9. Given the required set back of 40 feet from the road and the location of the driveway,there is no space to put a pool between the house and the road. Given the location of the house,driveways,septic systems,the road and the lake,this proposed location for the pool and hot tub would be the most appropriate area for practical and as well as ecstatic reasons. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me. John Krueger (651)707-5748 s i , i t • /\ / / � \ \ � � � i � ' � � � � �� ' '�, ,, , , , , ,, 1 ^ I //.7 / ';\ � .,r � , � � � �. , � � �i ' � . , � / � � � . -1 � � , ' - � `.b i � 1 ��qo � . / � T � Y/ 1� � , / ' ` / � �';' � � / / �� �� ` ' � � t / � � t ' ` �� , / ` � � \ \ � / � , � � � O � � � \ ` r i e � � h . � � i � � � � \ � h p � /� � �� � � �, I � \ � h h� � Ii � � �� a m J� . � �O � � / I 1i �,/ , ` ,� � � 'I �,� , �a � � � � ', �` GRAPHIC SCALE '�'� � ��;� J .{ i �, � ' �` y 3D J �5 30 BO'� d oj i.1 'ry r_i ' i � --I � 7 n '. - � � t ) � 0 � � � �� i � / � �� � f \ � iI � � > . . .� , � � � \ �` ( JN F�'f) , � � � � � 1 � J � � i � � � � . � / � � ` ��� �� � � I � � � f , � - - �e i r . . � - _ , , ,r. , , -,--;-;. � � ' � � � � � �t � , � �.o. , , � , � h P � � � � ' i , � � � t � � I, L � � {� � � � �� � I ` '1 i�i '�` .`i��jO, �� �r ,`` ; ; � . �, � '� ` � � (� � � �� � ' � � � � ,� 1' I � ` ----- � � �` � � ,, ,L� ; 3 - ___ -•=�-- �, , r , � � ---- ----- _ �'� '�. � �, '�. , ` , �� `- --_i •y - _ -�`"'�� � ,l � ; �� � ` � i� F - h ' i• . , � _ -- _ � � �,, , �� .. , --- _ _� , ', � `� '� ----- � �r� •�,� `` ���� , '. -z � �� `, , , � I �� � ,� ' � ��I` � ' � � . � � '� � e.�� � i � ! � ��` ��J `��oei-'" �- -- j Q ` ' } ` �+��I � ' '. I � � �� . � �-�� � � �1 ' � - W , ��� .,�,_:= _ � ,� � ` � , ,, , , � ,� I _- � r .�. � ' � —o:� o,n � � ` - ,v '``O- , � 'r � , � r ,� o . ' .f � i i � � .. � � �i. . , vi I`w - . r � 1 � �� � �'--- �� � ;tf ��fy7�► :�� �� � � i � i� � i � w 8 ;� '� � �'� � � � I t ' � . � I � S z � �. i .,.�__ � ^..� ' � ' � ' ' ' I � N \ T i� -• � � X`� -ss7, � ° � � � � � � J� �) � a �� � �� � � �— � � J � '�� ? �I ,�( , ; , �. � S • r-_ � /,'�' - �'� ;� ' � ...- � I 4S � � � � � z __ � � , ; � ,' ,' ,� ,� ; � ; ; '��- � r�>>. t d o, ' .'-� ,�' ,�' '/ ;1. ; � ; � 6 0 � . � � -z�- , , � � , . f � � , , V, �p - v' ; `� `� /; , Qj '�j ' /� ,'�; � � � f '' � � ' `� �� /'' / '' '�'�, '� ,(� � � ' ; -�' -'6 � � 2 , ' � ' ' �� ' / �• .. '� � ' r ' � ��' / �, ''' � '' � ',I�'�''J I � s °� g ; '� ' � ' ' ,�� ' ' �' �-' . ,�� o �o � , .,, , , , , , / , � , ,� � , � —e!1 ` , ' � � � ' '� / ' � ' � . � I �Mo �1 � �, � � �'! � , , � ; ,I t � ; �4 �� — -r----- � ` � � ; �� � � � ; � � , ; I � S j ', '� 1 � *� �a , ��� 1 ' � ' , ' ' ' � ,�.� � ' d y I 1 ,� g � ; �� � l��k 1 $ Y T �/ ►' ��' ` �.. � y � n �y. . �, i�� '� —'-- - -`��(( '- -�4j`'�--fi-��� ' � ' � � '� '� jl 'y �- � ; � � , , � ,,�s � b ,� , _�__ � L _ � � , • `� ,� \, 4 � 1-- � —�r--�l:l � i r— � �- r'1 , --'S��—� �, _ ��on�wAR.u�o��.,rl wo�cN����+c� � �-'��..f.,.,_�i , ef �� ` '� . ` `�� � ' .� ` rawo na� � ``Taaro qw��``�� \ � � �snee�ems: +-109.99-- � � . _ . . . � ` --i ror or�no�nnr-+ru N 88'16'30' W --105t-- �' ` . N 89'I6'30" W � � � �D FfZO�i y/�2d SETB�k �EQUlREO _�, ,----- - -