The URL can be used to link to this page

6.a Minor Subdivision - Old Marine Trail - Manthey AcresJacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T & E Surveys Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW’s-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans 1 July 15, 2017 RE: Project Name: Manthey – Long Lake Delineation Report Comm. No.: 2017-130 Project Location: Scandia – Washington County PID# 27.032.20.44.0003 T32N, R20W, Section 27 Project Description: Wetland Delineation Report Jacobson Environmental, PLLC. (JE) visited the above referenced site on May 24 and June 16, 2017 to perform an official wetland delineation in accordance with the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the 2012 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation: Northcentral and Northeast Region. The investigated area was approximately 28 acres in size, and was south of 14440 Old Marine Trail North in Scandia, Minnesota. See Figure 1 for a Site Location Map. The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map identified five wetlands within the property boundaries. The Web soil survey indentified the soils Santiago silt loam (rating=0), Rosholt sandy loam (rating=0), Comstock silt loam (rating=4), Barronett silt loam (rating=92), Duluth silt loam (rating=3), and water (rating=0) on the site. The DNR Public Waters Inventory identified PWI wetland 82006800 within the investigated boundaries. Eight basins were delineated within the site boundaries, which are summarized below. Note, there is no Basin 7. Basin ID Wetland Type Dominant Vegetation Circular 39 Cowardin Eggers & Reed 1 Type 1 PEM1A Seasonally flooded basin American elm fringe 2 Type 2 PEM1C Wet meadow Reed canary grass and spotted touch-me-not 3 Type 2/3/4 PEM1B/C/F Wet meadow/shallow marsh/deep marsh lake fringe Reed canary grass and tussock sedge 4 Type 5 PUBF Shallow open water community American elm fringe 5 Type 5 PUBF Shallow open water community American elm fringe 6 Type 5 PUBF Shallow open water community American elm fringe 8 Type 5 PUBF Shallow open water community American elm fringe 9 Type 1/2 PEM1A/Bd Ditched seasonally saturated wet meadow Reed canary grass and tussock sedge The growing season in this area is approximately from mid-April to mid-October, when the air temperature averages above 28 degrees F. This delineation was completed during the growing season. The previous three month’s precipitation data suggests that the delineation and sampling was conducted during wetter than normal conditions, though it is unlikely this affected delineated boundaries. Antecedent precipitation data is located in Appendix A. Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T & E Surveys Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW’s-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans 2 All figures and appendices referenced by this report are presented at the end of the text. The purpose of this study was to investigate the project area, identify areas meeting the technical criteria for wetlands, delineate the jurisdictional extent of the wetland basins, and classify the wetland habitat. This wetland delineation was performed and reported by Wayne Jacobson, Minnesota Professional Soil Scientist #30611, Society of Wetland Scientists – Professional Wetland Scientist #1000, University of Minnesota / BWSR Wetland Delineator, Certified #1019, American Fisheries Society – Associate Fisheries Scientist #A-171. Methodology The wetlands on the subject property were delineated using the routine determination methodology set forth in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Wetland boundaries were determined through a routine analysis of the vegetation, soils and hydrology which must all show wetland characteristics in order for an area to be delineated as a wetland. Wetlands are areas that are saturated or inundated with surface and or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in hydric soil conditions. Examples of wetlands include seasonally flooded basins, floodplain forests, wet meadows, shallow and deep marshes, shrub swamps, wooded swamps, fens, and bogs. Vegetation The plant species within the parcel were catalogued and assigned a wetland indicator status according to : Lichvar, R.W., Butterwick, N.C. Melvin, and W.N. Kirchner, 2014. The National Wetland Plant List: 2014 Update of Wetland Ratings, Phytoneuron 2014-41: 1-42. In the text of this report and on the enclosed data forms, the plant indicator status follows the plant’s scientific name unless a status has not been assigned. The hydrophytic plant criterion is met when more than 50 percent of the dominant species by the 50/20 rule for each stratum (herb, shrub/sapling, tree, and woody vine) were assigned an obligate (OBL)1, facultative wet (FACW), and/or facultative (FAC) wetland status. With the 50/20 rule, dominants are generally measured by absolute % cover in each stratum which individually or collectively account for more than 50% of total vegetative cover in the stratum, plus any other species which itself accounts for at least 20% of the total vegetativ e cover. Soils A hydric soil is a soil formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part. If a soil exhibits the indicators of a hydric soil or is identified as a hydric soil the hydric soil criterion is met. The break between hydric and non-hydric soils was determined by excavating soil pits along transects crossing the wetland/upland eco-tone and evaluating the soil colors, textures, and presence or absence of redoximorphic indicators (i.e., mottles, gley or oxidized rhizospheres). Hydric Soil Indicators for the 1 OBL=Obligate Wetland, occurs an estimated 99% in wetlands. FACW=Facultative Wetland, has an estimated 67%-99% probability of occurrence in wetlands. FAC=Facultative, is equally likely to occur in wetlands and non - wetlands, 34%-66% probability. FACU=Facultative Upland, occurs in wetlands only occasionally, 1%-23% probability. UPL=Upland, almost never occurs in wetlands, <1% probability. NI= No Indicator, insufficient information available to determine an indicator status. Positive or negative sign previo usly indicated a frequency toward higher (+) or lower (-) frequency of occurrence with an category. Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T & E Surveys Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW’s-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans 3 Midwest Region were noted as presented in the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States version 7.0 (USDA NRCS 2010) if present at each sample point. Also, upper soil profiles were compared to the mapped or inclusionary soil series found in the sample area for soil identification purposes. Cautions used in applying the Field Indicators of Hydric Soils There are hydric soils with morphologies that are difficult to interpret. These include soils with black, gray, or red parent material; soils with high pH; soils high or low in content of organic matter; recently developed hydric soils, and soils high in iron inputs. In some cases we do not currently have indicators to assist in the identification of hydric soils in these situations. As long as the soil meets the definition of a hydric soil, the lack of an indicator does not preclude the soil from being hydric. The indicators were developed mostly to identify the boundary of hydric soil areas and generally work best on the margins. Not all of the obviously wetter hydric soils will be identified by the indicators. Redoximorphic features are most likely to occur in soils that cycle between anaerobic (reduced) and aerobic (oxidized) conditions. Morphological features of hydric soils indicate that saturation and anaerobic conditions have existed under either contemporary or former hydrologic regimes. Where soil morphology seems inconsistent with the landscape, vegetation, or observable hydrology, it may be necessary to obtain the assistance of an experienced soil or wetland scientist to determine whether the soil is hydric. To clarify on some Washington County sites, 1. Many of these soils have black or gray parent materials 2. Many of the soils have a high organic matter content 3. The hydric soil margin is typically higher than the wetland boundary margin on the site 4. Not all of the obviously wetter soils will be identified by the indicators 5. Many of the hydric soils are Mollisols which are classic problem hydric soils in many cases Wetland Classification Wetland classifications discussed in the text are set forth in Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (FWS/OBS Publication 79/31, Cowardin et al. 1979) and Wetlands of the United States (USFWS Circular 39, Shaw and Fredine, 1971.) Additionally, plant community types as named by Eggers and Reed (1998) are given. Topographic maps, National Wetlands Inventory maps, the Web Soil Survey, Aerial Photographs, and DNR Protected Waters maps were consulted to locate potential wetland habitats. The Routine On-site Determination Method was used on this site. In this method, the following procedures were used: 1) The vegetative community was sampled in all present strata to determine whether 50% of the dominant plant species were hydrophytic using the 50/20 method. 2) Soil pits were dug using a dutch auger to depths of 18”-40”, noting soil profiles and any hydric soil characteristics. 3) Signs of wetland hydrology were noted and were compared to field criteria such as depth to shallow water table and depth of soil saturation found in the soil pits. Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T & E Surveys Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW’s-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans 4 Wetland edges were marked with orange numbered pin flags. 4-foot wood lath marked with orange “wetland boundary” flagging tape or flagging tied on vegetation may be used if site conditions warrant. Any wetlands were mapped using modern survey methods by others. At least one sample point transect crosses each delineated wetland edge. These transects consist of an upland sample point, and a wetland sample point. Other sample points may be located in areas which have one or more of the wetland vegetation, soils, or hydrologic characteristics present, or where questionable conditions exist. Sample points are marked with orange pin flags with a pink ribbon tied on them. Sample data sheets are found in Appendix B. Basin 1 Basin 1 was a T ype 1 PEM1A seasonally flooded basin. The basin had a fringe of American elm trees and no herbaceous vegetation. The basin was saturated at or near the surface around the edge and inundated in the center at the time of the field visit. A ditch connected the northeast portion of this basin to Basin 3. Adjacent upland was typically dominated by a canopy of oaks and red maples and some common buckthorn shrubs. Primary and secondary indicators were not observed in the upland, and hydric soil indicators were not found in upland soils. The wetland boundary typically followed a slight change in vegetation from wetland to upland plant communities, as well as a distinct change in topography. Basin 1 was not identified by the DNR NWI or PWI. It was located within an area mapped as Comstock silt loam by the Web Soil Survey. Sample data sheets 1-UP and 1-WET correspond to this basin. Basin 2 Basin 2 was a Type 2 PEM1C wet meadow dominated by reed canary grass and spotted touch-me-not. The basin was saturated at or near the surface around the edge at the time of the field visit, and extended south off of the property. A short ditch ran from the northwest portion of the basin to the south portion of Basin 3, Long Lake’s wetland fringe. Adjacent upland was typically dominated by a canopy of oaks and red maples and some common buckthorn shrubs. Primary and secondary indicators were not observed in the upland, and hydric soil indicators were not found in upland soils. The wetland boundary typically followed a gradual change in vegetation from wetland to upland plant communities, as well as a distinct change in topography. Basin 2 was identified by the DNR NWI as a PEM1C wetland. It was located within an area mapped as Comstock silt loam by the Web Soil Survey. Sample data sheets 2-UP and 2-WET correspond to this basin. Basin 3 Basin 3 was a T ype 2/3/4 PEM1B/C/F wet meadow/shallow marsh/deep marsh lake fringe dominated by reed canary grass, tussock sedge, and lake sedge. The basin was saturated at or near the surface around the edge and inundated near the lake edge at the time of the field visit. Four ditches emptied into this basin, connecting the basin to Basins 1, 2, and 9, and a basin off of the property to the south. Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T & E Surveys Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW’s-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans 5 Adjacent upland was typically dominated by a canopy of red maples, some common buckthorn shrubs and ostrich fern and smooth brome. Primary and secondary indicators were not observed in the upland, and hydric soil indicators were not found in upland soils. The wetland boundary typically followed a gradual change in vegetation from wetland to upland plant communities, as well as a distinct change in topography. Basin 3 was identified by the DNR NWI as a PEM1C/F wetland. The basin was also identified by the DNR PWI as protected wetland inventory ID 82006800. It was located within an area mapped as Water, Duluth silt loam, and Comstock silt loam by the Web Soil Survey. Sample data sheets 3-1 UP, 3-1 WET, 3-2 UP, and 3-2 WET correspond to this basin. Basin 4 Basin 4 was a Type 5 PUBF shallow open water community with an American elm fringe. Very little herbaceous vegetation was observed in the basin. The basin was saturated at or near the surface around the edges and was inundated in the center at the time of the field visit. Adjacent upland was typically dominated by a canopy of red maples and some common buckthorn shrubs, and a few fern species. Primary and secondary indicators were not observed in the upland, and hydric soil indicators were not typically found in upland soils. The wetland boundary typically followed a gradual change in vegetation from wetland to upland plant communities, as well as a gradual change in topography. Basin 4 was not identified by the DNR NWI. It was located within an area mapped as Santiago silt loam by the Web Soil Survey. Sample data sheets 4-UP and 4-WET correspond to this basin. Basin 5 Basin 5 was a Type 5 PUBF shallow open water communit y with an American elm fringe. Very little herbaceous vegetation was observed within the basin. The basin was saturated at or near the surface around the edges and was inundated in the center at the time of the field visit. Adjacent upland was typically dominated by a canopy of red maples and some common buckthorn shrubs, and a few fern species. Primary and secondary indicators were not observed in the upland, and hydric soil indicators were not typically found in upland soils. The wetland boundary typically followed a gradual change in vegetation from wetland to upland plant communities, as well as a gradual change in topography. Basin 5 was identified by the DNR NWI as a PUBF wetland. It was located within an area mapped as Comstock silt loam by the Web Soil Survey. Sample data sheets 5-UP and 5-WET correspond to this basin. Basin 6 Basin 6 was a Type 5 PUBF shallow open water communit y with an American elm fringe. Very little herbaceous vegetation was observed within the basin. The basin was saturated at or near the surface around the edges and was inundated in the center at the time of the field visit. Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T & E Surveys Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW’s-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans 6 Adjacent upland was typically dominated by a canopy of red maples and some common buckthorn shrubs, and a few fern species. Primary and secondary indicators were not observed in the upland, and hydric soil indicators were not typically found in upland soils. The wetland boundary typically followed a gradual change in vegetation from wetland to upland plant communities, as well as a gradual change in topography. Basin 6 was identified by the DNR NWI as a PUBF wetland. It was located within an area mapped as Comstock silt loam by the Web Soil Survey. Sample data sheets 6-UP and 6-WET correspond to this basin. Basin 8 Basin 8 was a Type 5 PUBF shallow open water communit y with an American elm fringe. Very little herbaceous vegetation was observed within the basin. The basin was saturated at or near the surface around the edges and was inundated in the center at the time of the field visit. Adjacent upland was typically dominated by a canopy of red maples and some common buckthorn shrubs, and a few fern species and Pennsylvania sedge. Primary and secondary indicators were not observed in the upland, and hydric soil indicators were not typically found in upland soils. The wetland boundary typically followed a gradual change in vegetation from wetland to upland plant communities, as well as a gradual change in topography. Basin 8 was identified by the DNR NWI as a PUBF wetland. It was located within an area mapped as Santiago silt loam by the Web Soil Survey. Sample data sheets 8-UP and 8-WET correspond to this basin. Basin 9 Basin 9 was a Type 1/2 PEM1A/Bd ditched seasonally saturated wet meadow. The basin was dominated by reed canary grass, tussock sedge, and lake sedge. A ditched area ran through the basin connecting it to Basin 3. The basin was saturated within 12 inches of the surface around the edges at the time of the field visit. Adjacent upland was typically dominated by a canopy of red maples, quaking aspens, and paper birch and a few fern species. Primary and secondary indicators were not observed in the upland, and hydric soil indicators were not typically found in upland soils. The wetland boundary typically followed a gradual change in vegetation from wetland to upland plant communities, as well as a slight change in topography. Basin 9 was not identified by the DNR NWI. It was located within an area mapped as Comstock silt loam by the Web Soil Survey. Sample data sheets 9-UP and 9-WET correspond to this basin. Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T & E Surveys Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW’s-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans 7 Confirmation of Jurisdictional Status We are submitting this report to the client and regulatory agencies to request a wetland boundary and type determination. We have enclosed an official WCA Approval of Wetland Type and Boundary form in Appendix D along with a USCOE wetland delineation concurrence request. Conclusion This wetland delineation meets the standards and criteria described in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the 2012 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation: Northcentral and Northeast Region. This was a Routine On Site Determination and the results reflect the conditions present at the time of the delineation. If any wetland impacts are planned for this project, permits would be necessary from the LGU and other agencies. I certify that I performed the field analysis and wrote the report for this wetland delineation. Thank you for the opportunity to provide wetland services on this important project. 7/15/17 TABLE OF CONTENTS FIGURES 1.Site Location Map 2.NWI Map 3.Soils Map 4.PWI Map 5.Wetland Delineation Map 6.Topographic Map 7.Hydric Soils Map APPENDICES A.Precipitation Data B.Sample Data Sheets C.Site Photographs D.Wetland Delineation Approval Forms FIGURES Site Old Marine Trail N Natio nal Wetla nd Inventory S ou rce : Esri, Dig it alGlob e, Ge oE ye, E arthstar Geographics, CNES/AirbusDS, USDA, USGS , Aer oG RID, IGN, an d the GIS User Community Ju ly 15 , 2017 steve.kloiber 0 0.1 0.20.0 5 mi 0 0.1 0.20.0 5 km 1:6,616 Figure 2 Soil Map—Washington County, Minnesota (Figure 3 - Soils Map) Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 7/12/2017 Page 1 of 3 50 0 7 8 3 0 50 0 7 9 1 0 50 0 7 9 9 0 50 0 8 0 7 0 50 0 8 1 5 0 50 0 8 2 3 0 50 0 8 3 1 0 50 0 8 3 9 0 50 0 8 4 7 0 50 0 7 8 3 0 50 0 7 9 1 0 50 0 7 9 9 0 50 0 8 0 7 0 50 0 8 1 5 0 50 0 8 2 3 0 50 0 8 3 1 0 50 0 8 3 9 0 50 0 8 4 7 0 514140 514220 514300 514380 514460 514540 514620 514140 514220 514300 514380 514460 514540 514620 45° 13' 46'' N 92 ° 4 9 ' 1 2 ' ' W 45° 13' 46'' N 92 ° 4 8 ' 4 9 ' ' W 45° 13' 25'' N 92 ° 4 9 ' 1 2 ' ' W 45° 13' 25'' N 92 ° 4 8 ' 4 9 ' ' W N Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 15N WGS84 0 150 300 600 900 Feet 0 45 90 180 270 Meters Map Scale: 1:3,220 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:15,800. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Washington County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 11, Sep 19, 2016 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 16, 2012—Apr 26, 2012 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Soil Map—Washington County, Minnesota (Figure 3 - Soils Map) Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 7/12/2017 Page 2 of 3 Map Unit Legend Washington County, Minnesota (MN163) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 153B Santiago silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 1.2 3.6% 153C Santiago silt loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes 2.7 8.5% 302B Rosholt sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 0.4 1.3% 452 Comstock silt loam 11.0 34.6% 456 Barronett silt loam 0.5 1.6% 504B Duluth silt loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes 12.4 38.9% W Water 3.7 11.5% Totals for Area of Interest 31.9 100.0% Soil Map—Washington County, Minnesota Figure 3 - Soils Map Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 7/12/2017 Page 3 of 3 Site Figure 5 - Wetland Delineation Map 3-2-UP 9-WET 6-WET6-UP 5-UP 5-WET 8-UP 8-WET 4-WET 4-UP 3-2 WET 9-UP 3-1 WET 3-1-UP 2-WET 2-UP 1-UP 1-WET Site Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Washington County, Minnesota (Figure 7 - Hydric Soil Rating) Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 7/12/2017 Page 1 of 5 50 0 7 8 3 0 50 0 7 9 1 0 50 0 7 9 9 0 50 0 8 0 7 0 50 0 8 1 5 0 50 0 8 2 3 0 50 0 8 3 1 0 50 0 8 3 9 0 50 0 8 4 7 0 50 0 7 8 3 0 50 0 7 9 1 0 50 0 7 9 9 0 50 0 8 0 7 0 50 0 8 1 5 0 50 0 8 2 3 0 50 0 8 3 1 0 50 0 8 3 9 0 50 0 8 4 7 0 514140 514220 514300 514380 514460 514540 514620 514140 514220 514300 514380 514460 514540 514620 45° 13' 46'' N 92 ° 4 9 ' 1 2 ' ' W 45° 13' 46'' N 92 ° 4 8 ' 4 9 ' ' W 45° 13' 25'' N 92 ° 4 9 ' 1 2 ' ' W 45° 13' 25'' N 92 ° 4 8 ' 4 9 ' ' W N Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 15N WGS84 0 150 300 600 900 Feet 0 45 90 180 270 Meters Map Scale: 1:3,220 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Rating Polygons Hydric (100%) Hydric (66 to 99%) Hydric (33 to 65%) Hydric (1 to 32%) Not Hydric (0%) Not rated or not available Soil Rating Lines Hydric (100%) Hydric (66 to 99%) Hydric (33 to 65%) Hydric (1 to 32%) Not Hydric (0%) Not rated or not available Soil Rating Points Hydric (100%) Hydric (66 to 99%) Hydric (33 to 65%) Hydric (1 to 32%) Not Hydric (0%) Not rated or not available Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:15,800. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Washington County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 11, Sep 19, 2016 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 16, 2012—Apr 26, 2012 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Washington County, Minnesota (Figure 7 - Hydric Soil Rating) Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 7/12/2017 Page 2 of 5 Hydric Rating by Map Unit Hydric Rating by Map Unit— Summary by Map Unit — Washington County, Minnesota (MN163) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 153B Santiago silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 0 1.2 3.6% 153C Santiago silt loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes 0 2.7 8.5% 302B Rosholt sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 0 0.4 1.3% 452 Comstock silt loam 4 11.0 34.6% 456 Barronett silt loam 92 0.5 1.6% 504B Duluth silt loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes 3 12.4 38.9% W Water 0 3.7 11.5% Totals for Area of Interest 31.9 100.0% Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Washington County, Minnesota Figure 7 - Hydric Soil Rating Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 7/12/2017 Page 3 of 5 APPENDIX A Precipitation Data Minnesota Climatology Working Group State Climatology Office - DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources University of Minnesota home | current conditions | journal | past data | summaries | agriculture | other sites | about us | search | Precipitation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Precipitation data for target wetland location: county: Washington township number: 32N township name: New Scandia range number: 20W nearest community: Scandia section number: 27 Aerial photograph or site visit date: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 Score using 1981-2010 normal period values are in inches A 'R' following a monthly total indicates a provisional value derived from radar-based estimates. first prior month: April 2017 second prior month: March 2017 third prior month: February 2017 estimated precipitation total for this location:4.17R 0.66 0.71 there is a 30% chance this location will have less than:1.86 1.20 0.49 there is a 30% chance this location will have more than:3.37 2.01 1.09 type of month: dry normal wet wet dry normal monthly score 3 * 3 = 9 2 * 1 = 2 1 * 2 = 2 multi-month score: 6 to 9 (dry) 10 to 14 (normal) 15 to 18 (wet)13 (Normal) Other Resources: retrieve daily precipitation data view radar-based precipitation estimates view weekly precipitation maps Evaluating Antecedent Precipitation Conditions (BWSR) Minnesota Climatology Working Group State Climatology Office - DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources University of Minnesota home | current conditions | journal | past data | summaries | agriculture | other sites | about us | search | Precipitation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Precipitation data for target wetland location: county: Washington township number: 32N township name: New Scandia range number: 20W nearest community: Scandia section number: 27 Aerial photograph or site visit date: Friday, June 16, 2017 Score using 1981-2010 normal period values are in inches A 'R' following a monthly total indicates a provisional value derived from radar-based estimates. first prior month: May 2017 second prior month: April 2017 third prior month: March 2017 estimated precipitation total for this location:4.74R 4.17R 0.66 there is a 30% chance this location will have less than:2.87 1.86 1.20 there is a 30% chance this location will have more than:4.18 3.37 2.01 type of month: dry normal wet wet wet dry monthly score 3 * 3 = 9 2 * 3 = 6 1 * 1 = 1 multi-month score: 6 to 9 (dry) 10 to 14 (normal) 15 to 18 (wet)16 (Wet) Other Resources: retrieve daily precipitation data view radar-based precipitation estimates view weekly precipitation maps Evaluating Antecedent Precipitation Conditions (BWSR) APPENDIX B Sample Data Sheets Slope (%): NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) Hydrophytic vegetation present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Hydric soil present? Indicators of wetland hydrology present?If yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Thin Muck Surface (C7) 2%Long.: Yes Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Soil Map Unit Name:Duluth silt loam Lat.: High Water Table (A2) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Marl Deposits (B15) 5/24/17Sampling Date:Old Marine Tr N - Long Lake Dan Manthey 1-UPSampling Point:MN Project/Site:City/County: Applicant/Owner:State: Scandia Investigator(s):CMC Section, Township, Range: Datum: Sec. 27, T32N, R20W (If no, explain in remarks) Are "normal circumstances" present? Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Local relief (concave, convex, none):hillslope Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS N N Y Other (Explain in Remarks) Water Marks (B1) Saturation (A3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Drift Deposits (B3) Sediment Deposits (B2) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Northcentral and Northeast Region >24 Yes N HYDROLOGY No Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) No Indicators of wetland hydrology present?N Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) convex Drainage Patterns (B10) No X Moss Trim Lines (B16) (includes capillary fringe) Field Observations: Surface water present? Water table present? Saturation present? Depth (inches):Yes X Depth (inches):>24 Shallow Aquitard (D3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Yes X -Depth (inches): US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region N N N N NN 50/20 Thresholds Tree Stratum 1 Sapling/Shrub Stratum 2 Herb Stratum 3 Woody Vine Stratum 4 5 Dominance Test Worksheet 6 7 8 (A) 9 10 (B) =Total Cover (A/B) 1 Prevalence Index Worksheet 2 Total % Cover of: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = 6 FACU species x 4 = 7 UPL species x 5 = 8 Column totals (A)(B) 9 Prevalence Index = B/A = 10 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation X Dominance test is >50% 1 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 =Total Cover 1 2 3 4 5 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) 75% bare ground and leaf litter at this sample point Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 50%20% 4 0 18 0 45 Sampling Point:1-UPVEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 Indicator Status Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across 0 0 110 0 15 0 20 30' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Woody Vine Stratum Plot Size ( Rhamnus cathartica 5 Y FAC Bryophyte spp 5 Y FAC 0 Herb Stratum Plot Size (5' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status Parthenocissus quinquefolia 10 Y FACU Dominant Species Indicator Status 90 Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot Size (15' radius )Absolute % Cover Tree Stratum Plot Size (30' radius 5 Acer rubrum Betula papyrifera 0 60 285 0 0 )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status 85 Y N FAC FACU Y Hydrophytic vegetation present? *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub - Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. 345 3 75.00% 3.14 4 95 10 0 US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B Histic Epipedon (A2)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Black Histic (A3)5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L Stratified Layers (A5)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Depleted Below Dark Suface (A11)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Depleted Matrix (F3)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Sandy Redox (S5)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Red Parent Material (F21) Stripped Matrix (S6)Redox Depressions (F8)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Remarks: 100 clay loam silt loam Type* Redox Features Texture loam0-8 10010YR3/2 Sampling Point:1-UPSOIL *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Depth (Inches) Matrix %Color (moist)Color (moist)%Loc** 16-24 10YR4/6 100 8-16 10YR5/4 Remarks Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, MLRA Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) Depth (inches): NHydric soil present? Hydric Soil Indicators: Type: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Slope (%): NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) Hydrophytic vegetation present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Hydric soil present? Indicators of wetland hydrology present?If yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) X X Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Thin Muck Surface (C7) 2%Long.: Yes Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Soil Map Unit Name:Comstock silt loam Lat.: High Water Table (A2) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Marl Deposits (B15) 5/24/17Sampling Date:Old Marine Tr N - Long Lake Dan Manthey 1-WETSampling Point:MN Project/Site:City/County: Applicant/Owner:State: Scandia Investigator(s):CMC Section, Township, Range: Datum: Sec. 27, T32N, R20W (If no, explain in remarks) Are "normal circumstances" present? Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Local relief (concave, convex, none):depression Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Y Y Y Other (Explain in Remarks) Water Marks (B1) Saturation (A3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Drift Deposits (B3) Sediment Deposits (B2) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Northcentral and Northeast Region 8 Yes X Y X HYDROLOGY No Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) No Indicators of wetland hydrology present?Y Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) PEM1A concave Drainage Patterns (B10) No Moss Trim Lines (B16) (includes capillary fringe) Field Observations: Surface water present? Water table present? Saturation present? Depth (inches):Yes Depth (inches):surface Shallow Aquitard (D3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Yes X -Depth (inches): US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region N N N N NN 50/20 Thresholds Tree Stratum 1 Sapling/Shrub Stratum 2 Herb Stratum 3 Woody Vine Stratum 4 5 Dominance Test Worksheet 6 7 8 (A) 9 10 (B) =Total Cover (A/B) 1 Prevalence Index Worksheet 2 Total % Cover of: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = 6 FACU species x 4 = 7 UPL species x 5 = 8 Column totals (A)(B) 9 Prevalence Index = B/A = 10 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation X Dominance test is >50% 1 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 =Total Cover 1 2 3 4 5 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) 90% bare ground and leaf litter and 5% open water at this sample point Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 50%20% 0 0 16 0 40 Sampling Point:1-WETVEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 Indicator Status Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across 0 0 80 0 0 0 0 30' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Woody Vine Stratum Plot Size ( 0 Herb Stratum Plot Size (5' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status Dominant Species Indicator Status 80 Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot Size (15' radius )Absolute % Cover Tree Stratum Plot Size (30' radius Acer rubrum 0 0 240 0 0 )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status 80 Y FAC Y Hydrophytic vegetation present? *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub - Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. 240 1 100.00% 3.00 1 80 0 0 US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B Histic Epipedon (A2)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Black Histic (A3)5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L Stratified Layers (A5)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) X Depleted Below Dark Suface (A11)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Depleted Matrix (F3)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Sandy Redox (S5)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Red Parent Material (F21) Stripped Matrix (S6)Redox Depressions (F8)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Remarks: 90 7.5YR4/6 M silty clay Type* Redox Features Texture silt loam0-6 10010YR3/2 Sampling Point:1-WETSOIL *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Depth (Inches) Matrix %Color (moist)Color (moist)%Loc** 6-24 10YR5/2 Remarks 10 C Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, MLRA Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) Depth (inches): YHydric soil present? Hydric Soil Indicators: Type: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Slope (%): NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) Hydrophytic vegetation present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Hydric soil present? Indicators of wetland hydrology present?If yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: 5/24/17Sampling Date:Old Marine Tr N - Long Lake Dan Manthey 2-UPSampling Point:MN Project/Site:City/County: Applicant/Owner:State: Scandia Investigator(s):CMC Section, Township, Range: Datum: Sec. 27, T32N, R20W (If no, explain in remarks) Are "normal circumstances" present? Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Local relief (concave, convex, none):hillslope 2%Long.: Yes Soil Map Unit Name:Comstock silt loam Lat.: Other (Explain in Remarks) Water Marks (B1) Saturation (A3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Marl Deposits (B15) Drift Deposits (B3) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS N N N High Water Table (A2) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Northcentral and Northeast Region >24 Yes N HYDROLOGY No Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) No Indicators of wetland hydrology present?N Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) convex Drainage Patterns (B10) No X Moss Trim Lines (B16) (includes capillary fringe) Field Observations: Surface water present? Water table present? Saturation present? Depth (inches):Yes X Depth (inches):>24 Shallow Aquitard (D3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Yes X -Depth (inches): Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region N N N N NN 50/20 Thresholds Tree Stratum 1 Sapling/Shrub Stratum 2 Herb Stratum 3 Woody Vine Stratum 4 5 Dominance Test Worksheet 6 7 8 (A) 9 10 (B) =Total Cover (A/B) 1 Prevalence Index Worksheet 2 Total % Cover of: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = 6 FACU species x 4 = 7 UPL species x 5 = 8 Column totals (A)(B) 9 Prevalence Index = B/A = 10 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation Dominance test is >50% 1 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 =Total Cover 1 2 3 4 5 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) 75% bare ground and leaf litter at this sample point Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 50%20% 6 2 15 5 38 Sampling Point:2-UPVEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 Indicator Status Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across 0 0 115 10 30 0 30 Woody Vine Stratum Plot Size ( 30' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Quercus alba 10 Y FACU Arctium minus 10 Y FACU 10 Herb Stratum Plot Size (5' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status Carex pennsylvanica 10 Y UPL Dominant Species Indicator Status Rhamnus cathartica 10 Y FAC 75 Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot Size (15' radius )Absolute % Cover Tree Stratum Plot Size (30' radius 10 Acer rubrum Betula papyrifera 50 120 225 0 0 )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status 65 Y N FAC FACU N Hydrophytic vegetation present? *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub - Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. 395 2 40.00% 3.43 5 75 15 0 US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B Histic Epipedon (A2)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Black Histic (A3)5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L Stratified Layers (A5)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Depleted Below Dark Suface (A11)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Depleted Matrix (F3)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Sandy Redox (S5)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Red Parent Material (F21) Stripped Matrix (S6)Redox Depressions (F8)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Remarks: 100 sandy loam Type* Redox Features Texture sandy loam0-10 10010YR3/1 Sampling Point:2-UPSOIL *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Depth (Inches) Matrix %Color (moist)Color (moist)%Loc** 10-24 10YR4/2 Remarks Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, MLRA Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) Depth (inches): NHydric soil present? Hydric Soil Indicators: Type: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Slope (%): NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) Hydrophytic vegetation present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Hydric soil present? Indicators of wetland hydrology present?If yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) X X Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Thin Muck Surface (C7) 2%Long.: Yes Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Soil Map Unit Name:Comstock silt loam Lat.: High Water Table (A2) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Marl Deposits (B15) 5/24/17Sampling Date:Old Marine Tr N - Long Lake Dan Manthey 2-WETSampling Point:MN Project/Site:City/County: Applicant/Owner:State: Scandia Investigator(s):CMC Section, Township, Range: Datum: Sec. 27, T32N, R20W (If no, explain in remarks) Are "normal circumstances" present? Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Local relief (concave, convex, none):depression Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Y Y Y Other (Explain in Remarks) Water Marks (B1) Saturation (A3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Drift Deposits (B3) Sediment Deposits (B2) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Northcentral and Northeast Region 12 Yes X Y X HYDROLOGY No Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) No Indicators of wetland hydrology present?Y Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) PEM1C concave Drainage Patterns (B10) No Moss Trim Lines (B16) (includes capillary fringe) Field Observations: Surface water present? Water table present? Saturation present? Depth (inches):Yes Depth (inches):surface Shallow Aquitard (D3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Yes X -Depth (inches): US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region N N N N NN 50/20 Thresholds Tree Stratum 1 Sapling/Shrub Stratum 2 Herb Stratum 3 Woody Vine Stratum 4 5 Dominance Test Worksheet 6 7 8 (A) 9 10 (B) =Total Cover (A/B) 1 Prevalence Index Worksheet 2 Total % Cover of: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = 6 FACU species x 4 = 7 UPL species x 5 = 8 Column totals (A)(B) 9 Prevalence Index = B/A = 10 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation X Dominance test is >50% 1 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 =Total Cover 1 2 3 4 5 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 50%20% 19 0 0 0 0 Sampling Point:2-WETVEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 Indicator Status Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across 95 0 95 0 0 0 95 30' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Woody Vine Stratum Plot Size ( Impatiens capensis 15 N FACW 0 Herb Stratum Plot Size (5' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status Phalaris arundinacea 80 Y FACW Dominant Species Indicator Status 0 Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot Size (15' radius )Absolute % Cover Tree Stratum Plot Size (30' radius 0 0 0 190 0 )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status Y Hydrophytic vegetation present? *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub - Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. 190 1 100.00% 2.00 1 0 48 0 US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B Histic Epipedon (A2)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Black Histic (A3)5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L Stratified Layers (A5)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) X Depleted Below Dark Suface (A11)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Depleted Matrix (F3)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Sandy Redox (S5)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Red Parent Material (F21) Stripped Matrix (S6)Redox Depressions (F8)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Remarks: 97 7.5YR4/6 PL sandy clay loam Type* Redox Features Texture sandy loam0-8 10010YR3/2 Sampling Point:2-WETSOIL *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Depth (Inches) Matrix %Color (moist)Color (moist)%Loc** 8-24 10YR4/2 Remarks 3 C Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, MLRA Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) Depth (inches): YHydric soil present? Hydric Soil Indicators: Type: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Slope (%): NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) Hydrophytic vegetation present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Hydric soil present? Indicators of wetland hydrology present?If yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Moss Trim Lines (B16) (includes capillary fringe) Field Observations: Surface water present? Water table present? Saturation present? Depth (inches):Yes X Depth (inches):>24 Shallow Aquitard (D3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Yes X -Depth (inches): WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Northcentral and Northeast Region >24 Yes N HYDROLOGY No Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) No Indicators of wetland hydrology present?N Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) convex Drainage Patterns (B10) No X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS N N N Other (Explain in Remarks) Water Marks (B1) Saturation (A3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Investigator(s):CMC Section, Township, Range: Datum: Sec. 27, T32N, R20W (If no, explain in remarks) Are "normal circumstances" present? Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Local relief (concave, convex, none):hillslope 5/24/17Sampling Date:Old Marine Tr N - Long Lake Dan Manthey 3-1 UPSampling Point:MN Project/Site:City/County: Applicant/Owner:State: Scandia Thin Muck Surface (C7) 2%Long.: Yes Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Soil Map Unit Name:Duluth silt loam Lat.: High Water Table (A2) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Marl Deposits (B15) Drift Deposits (B3) Sediment Deposits (B2) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region N N N N NN 50/20 Thresholds Tree Stratum 1 Sapling/Shrub Stratum 2 Herb Stratum 3 Woody Vine Stratum 4 5 Dominance Test Worksheet 6 7 8 (A) 9 10 (B) =Total Cover (A/B) 1 Prevalence Index Worksheet 2 Total % Cover of: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = 6 FACU species x 4 = 7 UPL species x 5 = 8 Column totals (A)(B) 9 Prevalence Index = B/A = 10 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation Dominance test is >50% 1 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 =Total Cover 1 2 3 4 5 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) N Hydrophytic vegetation present? *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub - Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. 415 2 40.00% 3.32 5 65 0 0 Tree Stratum Plot Size (30' radius 15 Acer rubrum Quercus rubra 0 200 195 20 0 )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status 35 Y Y FAC FACU FACU Quercus alba 15 Y Y FAC 65 Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot Size (15' radius )Absolute % Cover Prunus serotina 20 Y FACU Dominant Species Indicator Status Rhamnus cathartica 30 FACW Ulmus americana 60 Herb Stratum Plot Size (5' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status Woody Vine Stratum Plot Size ( 30' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species 0 0 Sampling Point:3-1 UPVEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 Indicator Status Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across 10 0 125 0 50 75% bare ground and leaf litter at this sample point Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 50%20% 0 12 13 30 33 10 N US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B Histic Epipedon (A2)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Black Histic (A3)5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L Stratified Layers (A5)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Depleted Below Dark Suface (A11)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Depleted Matrix (F3)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Sandy Redox (S5)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Red Parent Material (F21) Stripped Matrix (S6)Redox Depressions (F8)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Remarks: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, MLRA Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) Depth (inches): NHydric soil present? Hydric Soil Indicators: Type: Sampling Point:3-1 UPSOIL *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Depth (Inches) Matrix %Color (moist)Color (moist)%Loc** 8-24 10YR5/3 Remarks 5 C Type* Redox Features Texture loam0-8 10010YR3/1 95 7.5YR4/6 PL sandy clay loam US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Slope (%): NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) Hydrophytic vegetation present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Hydric soil present? Indicators of wetland hydrology present?If yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) X X X Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Thin Muck Surface (C7) 2%Long.: Yes Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Soil Map Unit Name:Barronett silt loam Lat.: High Water Table (A2) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Marl Deposits (B15) 5/24/17Sampling Date:Old Marine Tr N - Long Lake Dan Manthey 3-1 WETSampling Point:MN Project/Site:City/County: Applicant/Owner:State: Scandia Investigator(s):CMC Section, Township, Range: Datum: Sec. 27, T32N, R20W (If no, explain in remarks) Are "normal circumstances" present? Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Local relief (concave, convex, none):depression Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Y Y Y Other (Explain in Remarks) Water Marks (B1) Saturation (A3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Drift Deposits (B3) Sediment Deposits (B2) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Northcentral and Northeast Region 3 Yes X Y X HYDROLOGY NoX Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) No Indicators of wetland hydrology present?Y Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) PEM1C/F concave Drainage Patterns (B10) No Moss Trim Lines (B16) (includes capillary fringe) Field Observations: Surface water present? Water table present? Saturation present? Depth (inches):Yes Depth (inches):surface Shallow Aquitard (D3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Yes 1Depth (inches): US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region N N N N NN 50/20 Thresholds Tree Stratum 1 Sapling/Shrub Stratum 2 Herb Stratum 3 Woody Vine Stratum 4 5 Dominance Test Worksheet 6 7 8 (A) 9 10 (B) =Total Cover (A/B) 1 Prevalence Index Worksheet 2 Total % Cover of: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = 6 FACU species x 4 = 7 UPL species x 5 = 8 Column totals (A)(B) 9 Prevalence Index = B/A = 10 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation X Dominance test is >50% 1 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 =Total Cover 1 2 3 4 5 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) 5% open water at this sample point Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 50%20% 18 0 0 0 0 Sampling Point:3-1 WETVEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 Indicator Status Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across 90 0 90 0 0 0 90 30' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Woody Vine Stratum Plot Size ( Impatiens capensis 10 N FACW 0 Herb Stratum Plot Size (5' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status Phalaris arundinacea 80 Y FACW Dominant Species Indicator Status 0 Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot Size (15' radius )Absolute % Cover Tree Stratum Plot Size (30' radius 0 0 0 180 0 )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status Y Hydrophytic vegetation present? *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub - Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. 180 1 100.00% 2.00 1 0 45 0 US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B Histic Epipedon (A2)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Black Histic (A3)5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L Stratified Layers (A5)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) X Depleted Below Dark Suface (A11)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Depleted Matrix (F3)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Sandy Redox (S5)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Red Parent Material (F21) Stripped Matrix (S6)Redox Depressions (F8)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Remarks: 90 7.5YR4/6 fine sandy clay PL sandy clay loam Type* Redox Features Texture sandy loam0-10 10010YR3/1 Sampling Point:3-1 WETSOIL *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Depth (Inches) Matrix %Color (moist)Color (moist)%Loc** 20-24 10YR4/6 100 10-20 10YR6/1 Remarks 10 C Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, MLRA Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) Depth (inches): YHydric soil present? Hydric Soil Indicators: Type: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Slope (%): NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) Hydrophytic vegetation present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Hydric soil present? Indicators of wetland hydrology present?If yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Moss Trim Lines (B16) (includes capillary fringe) Field Observations: Surface water present? Water table present? Saturation present? Depth (inches):Yes X Depth (inches):>24 Shallow Aquitard (D3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Yes X -Depth (inches): WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Northcentral and Northeast Region >24 Yes N HYDROLOGY No Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) No Indicators of wetland hydrology present?N Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) convex Drainage Patterns (B10) No X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS N N Y Other (Explain in Remarks) Water Marks (B1) Saturation (A3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Investigator(s):CMC Section, Township, Range: Datum: Sec. 27, T32N, R20W (If no, explain in remarks) Are "normal circumstances" present? Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Local relief (concave, convex, none):hillslope 5/24/17Sampling Date:Old Marine Tr N - Long Lake Dan Manthey 3-2 UPSampling Point:MN Project/Site:City/County: Applicant/Owner:State: Scandia Thin Muck Surface (C7) 2%Long.: Yes Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Soil Map Unit Name:Comstock silt loam Lat.: High Water Table (A2) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Marl Deposits (B15) Drift Deposits (B3) Sediment Deposits (B2) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region N N N N NN 50/20 Thresholds Tree Stratum 1 Sapling/Shrub Stratum 2 Herb Stratum 3 Woody Vine Stratum 4 5 Dominance Test Worksheet 6 7 8 (A) 9 10 (B) =Total Cover (A/B) 1 Prevalence Index Worksheet 2 Total % Cover of: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = 6 FACU species x 4 = 7 UPL species x 5 = 8 Column totals (A)(B) 9 Prevalence Index = B/A = 10 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation X Dominance test is >50% 1 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 =Total Cover 1 2 3 4 5 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Y Hydrophytic vegetation present? *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub - Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. 475 5 100.00% 3.06 5 140 33 0 Tree Stratum Plot Size (30' radius Acer rubrum 25 20 420 10 0 )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status 45 Y FAC Y FAC 45 Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot Size (15' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status Rhamnus cathartica 45 45 Herb Stratum Plot Size (5' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status Rhamnus cathartica 30 Y FAC 5 N UPL Solidago altissima 5 N FACU Matteuccia struthiopteris 10 Y FAC Galium boreale 10 Y FAC 5 N FACWPhalaris arundinacea Woody Vine Stratum Plot Size ( Bromus inermis 30' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species 0 65 Sampling Point:3-2 UPVEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 Indicator Status Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across 5 0 155 5 5 30% bare ground and leaf litter at this sample point Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 50%20% 13 9 9 23 23 US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B Histic Epipedon (A2)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Black Histic (A3)5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L Stratified Layers (A5)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Depleted Below Dark Suface (A11)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Depleted Matrix (F3)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Sandy Redox (S5)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Red Parent Material (F21) Stripped Matrix (S6)Redox Depressions (F8)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Remarks: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, MLRA Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) Depth (inches): NHydric soil present? Hydric Soil Indicators: Type: Sampling Point:3-2 UPSOIL *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix 5 C PL Depth (Inches) Matrix %Color (moist)Color (moist)%Loc** 10-20 10YR5/2 95 7.5YR4/6 6-10 10YR4/2 RemarksType* Redox Features Texture sandy loam0-6 10010YR3/1 100 sandy clay loam sandy loam 20-24 10YR5/5 95 7.5YR4/6 5 C PL sandy clay loam US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Slope (%): NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) Hydrophytic vegetation present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Hydric soil present? Indicators of wetland hydrology present?If yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) X X X Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Thin Muck Surface (C7) 2%Long.: Yes Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Soil Map Unit Name:Comstock silt loam Lat.: High Water Table (A2) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Marl Deposits (B15) 5/24/17Sampling Date:Old Marine Tr N - Long Lake Dan Manthey 3-2 WETSampling Point:MN Project/Site:City/County: Applicant/Owner:State: Scandia Investigator(s):CMC Section, Township, Range: Datum: Sec. 27, T32N, R20W (If no, explain in remarks) Are "normal circumstances" present? Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Local relief (concave, convex, none):depression Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Y Y Y Other (Explain in Remarks) Water Marks (B1) Saturation (A3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Drift Deposits (B3) Sediment Deposits (B2) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Northcentral and Northeast Region 3 Yes X Y X HYDROLOGY NoX Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) No Indicators of wetland hydrology present?Y Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) PEM1C/F concave Drainage Patterns (B10) No Moss Trim Lines (B16) (includes capillary fringe) Field Observations: Surface water present? Water table present? Saturation present? Depth (inches):Yes Depth (inches):surface Shallow Aquitard (D3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Yes 1Depth (inches): US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region N N N N NN 50/20 Thresholds Tree Stratum 1 Sapling/Shrub Stratum 2 Herb Stratum 3 Woody Vine Stratum 4 5 Dominance Test Worksheet 6 7 8 (A) 9 10 (B) =Total Cover (A/B) 1 Prevalence Index Worksheet 2 Total % Cover of: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = 6 FACU species x 4 = 7 UPL species x 5 = 8 Column totals (A)(B) 9 Prevalence Index = B/A = 10 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation X Dominance test is >50% 1 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 =Total Cover 1 2 3 4 5 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 50%20% 19 0 0 0 0 Sampling Point:3-2 WETVEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 Indicator Status Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across 85 10 95 0 0 0 95 30' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Woody Vine Stratum Plot Size ( Carex lacustris 10 N OBL 0 Herb Stratum Plot Size (5' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status Phalaris arundinacea 85 Y FACW Dominant Species Indicator Status 0 Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot Size (15' radius )Absolute % Cover Tree Stratum Plot Size (30' radius 0 0 0 170 10 )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status Y Hydrophytic vegetation present? *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub - Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. 180 1 100.00% 1.89 1 0 48 0 US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B Histic Epipedon (A2)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Black Histic (A3)5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L Stratified Layers (A5)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) X Depleted Below Dark Suface (A11)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Depleted Matrix (F3)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Sandy Redox (S5)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Red Parent Material (F21) Stripped Matrix (S6)Redox Depressions (F8)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Remarks: 90 7.5YR4/6 silty clay loam PL silty clay loam 20-24 10YR6/2 90 7.5YR4/6 10 C PL clay Type* Redox Features Texture loam0-4 10010YR2/1 Sampling Point:3-2 WETSOIL *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix 10 C PL Depth (Inches) Matrix %Color (moist)Color (moist)%Loc** 10-20 10YR4/2 90 7.5YR4/6 4-10 10YR6/2 Remarks 10 C Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, MLRA Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) Depth (inches): YHydric soil present? Hydric Soil Indicators: Type: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Slope (%): NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) Hydrophytic vegetation present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Hydric soil present? Indicators of wetland hydrology present?If yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Moss Trim Lines (B16) (includes capillary fringe) Field Observations: Surface water present? Water table present? Saturation present? Depth (inches):Yes X Depth (inches):18 Shallow Aquitard (D3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Yes X -Depth (inches): WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Northcentral and Northeast Region >24 Yes X N HYDROLOGY No Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) No Indicators of wetland hydrology present?N Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) convex Drainage Patterns (B10) No Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS N N Y Other (Explain in Remarks) Water Marks (B1) Saturation (A3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Investigator(s):CMC Section, Township, Range: Datum: Sec. 27, T32N, R20W (If no, explain in remarks) Are "normal circumstances" present? Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Local relief (concave, convex, none):hillslope 5/24/17Sampling Date:Old Marine Tr N - Long Lake Dan Manthey 4-UPSampling Point:MN Project/Site:City/County: Applicant/Owner:State: Scandia Thin Muck Surface (C7) 2%Long.: Yes Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Soil Map Unit Name:Comstock silt loam Lat.: High Water Table (A2) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Marl Deposits (B15) Drift Deposits (B3) Sediment Deposits (B2) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region N N N N NN 50/20 Thresholds Tree Stratum 1 Sapling/Shrub Stratum 2 Herb Stratum 3 Woody Vine Stratum 4 5 Dominance Test Worksheet 6 7 8 (A) 9 10 (B) =Total Cover (A/B) 1 Prevalence Index Worksheet 2 Total % Cover of: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = 6 FACU species x 4 = 7 UPL species x 5 = 8 Column totals (A)(B) 9 Prevalence Index = B/A = 10 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation X Dominance test is >50% 1 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 =Total Cover 1 2 3 4 5 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Y Hydrophytic vegetation present? *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub - Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. 290 1 100.00% 3.22 1 70 0 0 Tree Stratum Plot Size (30' radius 15 Acer rubrum Quercus rubra 0 80 210 0 0 )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status 70 Y N FAC FACU FACU Betula papyrifera 5 N 90 Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot Size (15' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status 0 Herb Stratum Plot Size (5' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status Woody Vine Stratum Plot Size ( 30' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species 0 0 Sampling Point:4-UPVEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 Indicator Status Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across 0 0 90 0 20 90% bare ground and leaf litter at this sample point Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 50%20% 0 0 18 0 45 US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B Histic Epipedon (A2)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Black Histic (A3)5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L Stratified Layers (A5)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Depleted Below Dark Suface (A11)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Depleted Matrix (F3)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Sandy Redox (S5)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Red Parent Material (F21) Stripped Matrix (S6)Redox Depressions (F8)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Remarks: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, MLRA Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) Depth (inches): NHydric soil present? Hydric Soil Indicators: Type: Sampling Point:4-UPSOIL *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Depth (Inches) Matrix %Color (moist)Color (moist)%Loc** 18-24 10YR4/4 100 6-18 10YR4/3 RemarksType* Redox Features Texture loam0-6 10010YR3/2 100 sandy loam sandy loam US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Slope (%): NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) Hydrophytic vegetation present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Hydric soil present? Indicators of wetland hydrology present?If yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) X X X Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Thin Muck Surface (C7) 2%Long.: Yes Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Soil Map Unit Name:Santiago silt loam Lat.: High Water Table (A2) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Marl Deposits (B15) 5/24/17Sampling Date:Old Marine Tr N - Long Lake Dan Manthey 4-WETSampling Point:MN Project/Site:City/County: Applicant/Owner:State: Scandia Investigator(s):CMC Section, Township, Range: Datum: Sec. 27, T32N, R20W (If no, explain in remarks) Are "normal circumstances" present? Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Local relief (concave, convex, none):depression Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Y Y Y Other (Explain in Remarks) Water Marks (B1) Saturation (A3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Drift Deposits (B3) Sediment Deposits (B2) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Northcentral and Northeast Region 1 Yes X Y X HYDROLOGY NoX Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) No Indicators of wetland hydrology present?Y Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) PUBF concave Drainage Patterns (B10) No Moss Trim Lines (B16) (includes capillary fringe) Field Observations: Surface water present? Water table present? Saturation present? Depth (inches):Yes Depth (inches):surface Shallow Aquitard (D3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Yes 1Depth (inches): US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region N N N N NN 50/20 Thresholds Tree Stratum 1 Sapling/Shrub Stratum 2 Herb Stratum 3 Woody Vine Stratum 4 5 Dominance Test Worksheet 6 7 8 (A) 9 10 (B) =Total Cover (A/B) 1 Prevalence Index Worksheet 2 Total % Cover of: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = 6 FACU species x 4 = 7 UPL species x 5 = 8 Column totals (A)(B) 9 Prevalence Index = B/A = 10 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation X Dominance test is >50% 1 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 =Total Cover 1 2 3 4 5 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) 90% open water at this sample point Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 50%20% 1 0 16 0 40 Sampling Point:4-WETVEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 Indicator Status Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across 65 0 85 0 0 0 5 30' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Woody Vine Stratum Plot Size ( 0 Herb Stratum Plot Size (5' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status Matteuccia struthiopteris 5 Y FAC Dominant Species Indicator Status 80 Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot Size (15' radius )Absolute % Cover Tree Stratum Plot Size (30' radius 15 Ulmus americana Acer rubrum 0 0 60 130 0 )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status 65 Y N FACW FAC Y Hydrophytic vegetation present? *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub - Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. 190 2 100.00% 2.24 2 20 3 0 US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B Histic Epipedon (A2)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Black Histic (A3)5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L Stratified Layers (A5)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) X Depleted Below Dark Suface (A11)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Depleted Matrix (F3)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Sandy Redox (S5)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Red Parent Material (F21) Stripped Matrix (S6)Redox Depressions (F8)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Remarks: 98 7.5YR4/6 PL silty loam Type* Redox Features Texture silty loam0-4 10010YR3/1 Sampling Point:4-WETSOIL *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Depth (Inches) Matrix %Color (moist)Color (moist)%Loc** 4-24 10YR5/2 Remarks 2 C Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, MLRA Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) Depth (inches): YHydric soil present? Hydric Soil Indicators: Type: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Slope (%): NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) Hydrophytic vegetation present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Hydric soil present? Indicators of wetland hydrology present?If yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Moss Trim Lines (B16) (includes capillary fringe) Field Observations: Surface water present? Water table present? Saturation present? Depth (inches):Yes X Depth (inches):>24 Shallow Aquitard (D3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Yes X -Depth (inches): WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Northcentral and Northeast Region >24 Yes According to three month antecedent precipitation data, sampling was conducted during wetter than normal climate conditions N HYDROLOGY No Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) No Indicators of wetland hydrology present?N Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) convex Drainage Patterns (B10) No X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS N N N Other (Explain in Remarks) Water Marks (B1) Saturation (A3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Investigator(s):CMC Section, Township, Range: Datum: Sec. 27, T32N, R20W (If no, explain in remarks) Are "normal circumstances" present? Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Local relief (concave, convex, none):hillslope 6/16/17Sampling Date:Old Marine Tr N - Long Lake Dan Manthey 5-UPSampling Point:MN Project/Site:City/County: Applicant/Owner:State: Scandia Thin Muck Surface (C7) 2%Long.: No Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Soil Map Unit Name:Comstock silt loam Lat.: High Water Table (A2) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Marl Deposits (B15) Drift Deposits (B3) Sediment Deposits (B2) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region N N N N NN 50/20 Thresholds Tree Stratum 1 Sapling/Shrub Stratum 2 Herb Stratum 3 Woody Vine Stratum 4 5 Dominance Test Worksheet 6 7 8 (A) 9 10 (B) =Total Cover (A/B) 1 Prevalence Index Worksheet 2 Total % Cover of: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = 6 FACU species x 4 = 7 UPL species x 5 = 8 Column totals (A)(B) 9 Prevalence Index = B/A = 10 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation Dominance test is >50% 1 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 =Total Cover 1 2 3 4 5 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) N Hydrophytic vegetation present? *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub - Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. 750 1 33.33% 4.55 3 35 48 0 Tree Stratum Plot Size (30' radius 30 Quercus ellipsoidalis Acer rubrum 625 20 105 0 0 )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status 40 Y Y UPL FAC 70 Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot Size (15' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status 0 Herb Stratum Plot Size (5' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status Carex pennsylvanica 85 Y UPL Matteuccia struthiopteris 5 N FAC Parthenocissus quinquefolia 5 N FACU Woody Vine Stratum Plot Size ( 30' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species 0 95 Sampling Point:5-UPVEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 Indicator Status Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across 0 0 165 125 5 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 50%20% 19 0 14 0 35 US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B Histic Epipedon (A2)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Black Histic (A3)5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L Stratified Layers (A5)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Depleted Below Dark Suface (A11)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Depleted Matrix (F3)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Sandy Redox (S5)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Red Parent Material (F21) Stripped Matrix (S6)Redox Depressions (F8)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Remarks: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, MLRA Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) Depth (inches): NHydric soil present? Hydric Soil Indicators: Type: Sampling Point:5-UPSOIL *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Depth (Inches) Matrix %Color (moist)Color (moist)%Loc** 18-24 10YR5/3 100 4-18 10YR4/3 RemarksType* Redox Features Texture silt loam0-4 10010YR4/2 100 silt loam silt loam US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Slope (%): NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) Hydrophytic vegetation present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Hydric soil present? Indicators of wetland hydrology present?If yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) X X Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Thin Muck Surface (C7) 2%Long.: No Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Soil Map Unit Name:Comstock silt loam Lat.: High Water Table (A2) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Marl Deposits (B15) 6/16/17Sampling Date:Old Marine Tr N - Long Lake Dan Manthey 5-WETSampling Point:MN Project/Site:City/County: Applicant/Owner:State: Scandia Investigator(s):CMC Section, Township, Range: Datum: Sec. 27, T32N, R20W (If no, explain in remarks) Are "normal circumstances" present? Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Local relief (concave, convex, none):depression Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Y Y Y Other (Explain in Remarks) Water Marks (B1) Saturation (A3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Drift Deposits (B3) Sediment Deposits (B2) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Northcentral and Northeast Region 4 Yes X According to three month antecedent precipitation data, sampling was conducted during wetter than normal climate conditions Y X HYDROLOGY No Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) No Indicators of wetland hydrology present?Y Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) PUBF concave Drainage Patterns (B10) No Moss Trim Lines (B16) (includes capillary fringe) Field Observations: Surface water present? Water table present? Saturation present? Depth (inches):Yes Depth (inches):surface Shallow Aquitard (D3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Yes X -Depth (inches): US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region N N N N NN 50/20 Thresholds Tree Stratum 1 Sapling/Shrub Stratum 2 Herb Stratum 3 Woody Vine Stratum 4 5 Dominance Test Worksheet 6 7 8 (A) 9 10 (B) =Total Cover (A/B) 1 Prevalence Index Worksheet 2 Total % Cover of: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = 6 FACU species x 4 = 7 UPL species x 5 = 8 Column totals (A)(B) 9 Prevalence Index = B/A = 10 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation X Dominance test is >50% 1 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 =Total Cover 1 2 3 4 5 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) 90% bare ground, leaf litter, and open water at this sample point Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 50%20% 0 1 12 3 30 Sampling Point:5-WETVEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 Indicator Status Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across 50 0 65 0 0 0 0 30' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Woody Vine Stratum Plot Size ( 5 Herb Stratum Plot Size (5' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status Dominant Species Indicator Status Rhamnus cathartica 5 Y N FAC 60 Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot Size (15' radius )Absolute % Cover Acer rubrum 10 Tree Stratum Plot Size (30' radius 20 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Ulmus americana 0 0 45 100 0 )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status 30 Y Y FACW FACW FAC Y Hydrophytic vegetation present? *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub - Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. 145 3 100.00% 2.23 3 15 0 0 US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B Histic Epipedon (A2)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Black Histic (A3)5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L Stratified Layers (A5)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) X Depleted Below Dark Suface (A11)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Depleted Matrix (F3)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Sandy Redox (S5)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Red Parent Material (F21) Stripped Matrix (S6)Redox Depressions (F8)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Remarks: 93 7.5YR4/6 silty clay loam PL silt Type* Redox Features Texture silty loam0-5 10010YR3/1 Sampling Point:5-WETSOIL *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix 12 C PL Depth (Inches) Matrix %Color (moist)Color (moist)%Loc** 18-24 10YR5/2 88 7.5YR4/6 5-18 10YR4/1 Remarks 7 C Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, MLRA Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) Depth (inches): YHydric soil present? Hydric Soil Indicators: Type: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Slope (%): NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) Hydrophytic vegetation present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Hydric soil present? Indicators of wetland hydrology present?If yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Moss Trim Lines (B16) (includes capillary fringe) Field Observations: Surface water present? Water table present? Saturation present? Depth (inches):Yes Depth (inches):18 Shallow Aquitard (D3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Yes X -Depth (inches): WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Northcentral and Northeast Region 20 Yes X According to three month antecedent precipitation data, sampling was conducted during wetter than normal climate conditions N X HYDROLOGY No Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) No Indicators of wetland hydrology present?N Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) convex Drainage Patterns (B10) No Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS N N N Other (Explain in Remarks) Water Marks (B1) Saturation (A3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Investigator(s):CMC Section, Township, Range: Datum: Sec. 27, T32N, R20W (If no, explain in remarks) Are "normal circumstances" present? Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Local relief (concave, convex, none):hillslope 6/16/17Sampling Date:Old Marine Tr N - Long Lake Dan Manthey 6-UPSampling Point:MN Project/Site:City/County: Applicant/Owner:State: Scandia Thin Muck Surface (C7) 2%Long.: No Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Soil Map Unit Name:Comstock silt loam Lat.: High Water Table (A2) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Marl Deposits (B15) Drift Deposits (B3) Sediment Deposits (B2) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region N N N N NN 50/20 Thresholds Tree Stratum 1 Sapling/Shrub Stratum 2 Herb Stratum 3 Woody Vine Stratum 4 5 Dominance Test Worksheet 6 7 8 (A) 9 10 (B) =Total Cover (A/B) 1 Prevalence Index Worksheet 2 Total % Cover of: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = 6 FACU species x 4 = 7 UPL species x 5 = 8 Column totals (A)(B) 9 Prevalence Index = B/A = 10 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation Dominance test is >50% 1 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 =Total Cover 1 2 3 4 5 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) N Hydrophytic vegetation present? *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub - Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. 365 3 50.00% 3.32 6 80 10 0 Tree Stratum Plot Size (30' radius 10 Acer rubrum Quercus rubra 25 100 240 0 0 )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status 55 Y N FAC FACU Y FAC 65 Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot Size (15' radius )Absolute % Cover Prunus serotina 10 Y FACU Dominant Species Indicator Status Rhamnus cathartica 15 25 Herb Stratum Plot Size (5' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status Rhamnus cathartica 10 Y FAC Prunus serotina 5 Y FACU Carex pennsylvanica 5 Y UPL Woody Vine Stratum Plot Size ( 30' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species 0 20 Sampling Point:6-UPVEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 Indicator Status Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across 0 0 110 5 25 75% bare ground and leaf litter at this sample point Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 50%20% 4 5 13 13 33 US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B Histic Epipedon (A2)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Black Histic (A3)5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L Stratified Layers (A5)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Depleted Below Dark Suface (A11)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Depleted Matrix (F3)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Sandy Redox (S5)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Red Parent Material (F21) Stripped Matrix (S6)Redox Depressions (F8)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Remarks: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, MLRA Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) Depth (inches): NHydric soil present? Hydric Soil Indicators: Type: Sampling Point:6-UPSOIL *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Depth (Inches) Matrix %Color (moist)Color (moist)%Loc** 12-24 10YR5/3 100 6-12 10YR4/3 RemarksType* Redox Features Texture silt loam0-6 10010YR3/2 100 silt loam silt loam US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Slope (%): NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) Hydrophytic vegetation present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Hydric soil present? Indicators of wetland hydrology present?If yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) X X Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Thin Muck Surface (C7) 2%Long.: No Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Soil Map Unit Name:Comstock silt loam Lat.: High Water Table (A2) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Marl Deposits (B15) 6/16/17Sampling Date:Old Marine Tr N - Long Lake Dan Manthey 6-WETSampling Point:MN Project/Site:City/County: Applicant/Owner:State: Scandia Investigator(s):CMC Section, Township, Range: Datum: Sec. 27, T32N, R20W (If no, explain in remarks) Are "normal circumstances" present? Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Local relief (concave, convex, none):depression Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Y Y Y Other (Explain in Remarks) Water Marks (B1) Saturation (A3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Drift Deposits (B3) Sediment Deposits (B2) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Northcentral and Northeast Region 7 Yes X According to three month antecedent precipitation data, sampling was conducted during wetter than normal climate conditions Y X HYDROLOGY No Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) No Indicators of wetland hydrology present?Y Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) PUBF concave Drainage Patterns (B10) No Moss Trim Lines (B16) (includes capillary fringe) Field Observations: Surface water present? Water table present? Saturation present? Depth (inches):Yes Depth (inches):4 Shallow Aquitard (D3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Yes X -Depth (inches): US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region N N N N NN 50/20 Thresholds Tree Stratum 1 Sapling/Shrub Stratum 2 Herb Stratum 3 Woody Vine Stratum 4 5 Dominance Test Worksheet 6 7 8 (A) 9 10 (B) =Total Cover (A/B) 1 Prevalence Index Worksheet 2 Total % Cover of: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = 6 FACU species x 4 = 7 UPL species x 5 = 8 Column totals (A)(B) 9 Prevalence Index = B/A = 10 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation X Dominance test is >50% 1 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 =Total Cover 1 2 3 4 5 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) 80% bare ground and leaf litter at this sample point Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 50%20% 3 0 18 0 45 Sampling Point:6-WETVEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 Indicator Status Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across 65 0 105 0 0 0 15 30' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Woody Vine Stratum Plot Size ( Rhamnus cathartica 5 Y FAC 0 Herb Stratum Plot Size (5' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status Phalaris arundinacea 10 Y FACW Dominant Species Indicator Status 90 Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot Size (15' radius )Absolute % Cover Tree Stratum Plot Size (30' radius 35 Ulmus americana Acer rubrum 0 0 120 130 0 )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status 55 Y Y FACW FAC Y Hydrophytic vegetation present? *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub - Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. 250 4 100.00% 2.38 4 40 8 0 US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B Histic Epipedon (A2)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Black Histic (A3)5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L Stratified Layers (A5)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) X Depleted Below Dark Suface (A11)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Depleted Matrix (F3)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Sandy Redox (S5)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Red Parent Material (F21) Stripped Matrix (S6)Redox Depressions (F8)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Remarks: 100 silty loam silty loam 16-24 10YR5/2 90 7.5YR4/6 10 C PL silty clay loam Type* Redox Features Texture silty loam0-5 10010YR2/1 Sampling Point:6-WETSOIL *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix 7 C PL Depth (Inches) Matrix %Color (moist)Color (moist)%Loc** 7-16 10YR4/2 93 7.5YR4/6 5-7 10YR3/1 Remarks Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, MLRA Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) Depth (inches): YHydric soil present? Hydric Soil Indicators: Type: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Slope (%): NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) Hydrophytic vegetation present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Hydric soil present? Indicators of wetland hydrology present?If yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Moss Trim Lines (B16) (includes capillary fringe) Field Observations: Surface water present? Water table present? Saturation present? Depth (inches):Yes X Depth (inches):>24 Shallow Aquitard (D3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Yes X -Depth (inches): WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Northcentral and Northeast Region >24 Yes According to three month antecedent precipitation data, sampling was conducted during wetter than normal climate conditions N HYDROLOGY No Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) No Indicators of wetland hydrology present?N Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) convex Drainage Patterns (B10) No X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS N N Y Other (Explain in Remarks) Water Marks (B1) Saturation (A3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Investigator(s):CMC Section, Township, Range: Datum: Sec. 27, T32N, R20W (If no, explain in remarks) Are "normal circumstances" present? Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Local relief (concave, convex, none):hillslope 6/16/17Sampling Date:Old Marine Tr N - Long Lake Dan Manthey 8-UPSampling Point:MN Project/Site:City/County: Applicant/Owner:State: Scandia Thin Muck Surface (C7) 2%Long.: No Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Soil Map Unit Name:Santiago silt loam Lat.: High Water Table (A2) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Marl Deposits (B15) Drift Deposits (B3) Sediment Deposits (B2) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region N N N N NN 50/20 Thresholds Tree Stratum 1 Sapling/Shrub Stratum 2 Herb Stratum 3 Woody Vine Stratum 4 5 Dominance Test Worksheet 6 7 8 (A) 9 10 (B) =Total Cover (A/B) 1 Prevalence Index Worksheet 2 Total % Cover of: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = 6 FACU species x 4 = 7 UPL species x 5 = 8 Column totals (A)(B) 9 Prevalence Index = B/A = 10 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation X Dominance test is >50% 1 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 =Total Cover 1 2 3 4 5 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Y Hydrophytic vegetation present? *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub - Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. 485 4 57.14% 3.23 7 120 10 0 Tree Stratum Plot Size (30' radius 20 Acer rubrum Quercus rubra 25 100 360 0 0 )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status 55 Y Y FAC FACU Y FAC 75 Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot Size (15' radius )Absolute % Cover Rhamnus cathartica 25 Y FAC Dominant Species Indicator Status Acer rubrum 30 55 Herb Stratum Plot Size (5' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status Rhamnus cathartica 10 Y FAC Prunus serotina 5 Y FACU Carex pennsylvanica 5 Y UPL Woody Vine Stratum Plot Size ( 30' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species 0 20 Sampling Point:8-UPVEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 Indicator Status Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across 0 0 150 5 25 75% bare ground and leaf litter at this sample point Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 50%20% 4 11 15 28 38 US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B Histic Epipedon (A2)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Black Histic (A3)5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L Stratified Layers (A5)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Depleted Below Dark Suface (A11)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Depleted Matrix (F3)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Sandy Redox (S5)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Red Parent Material (F21) Stripped Matrix (S6)Redox Depressions (F8)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Remarks: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, MLRA Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) Depth (inches): NHydric soil present? Hydric Soil Indicators: Type: Sampling Point:8-UPSOIL *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Depth (Inches) Matrix %Color (moist)Color (moist)%Loc** 12-24 10YR5/3 100 8-12 10YR4/3 RemarksType* Redox Features Texture silt loam0-8 10010YR3/2 100 silt loam silt loam US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Slope (%): NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) Hydrophytic vegetation present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Hydric soil present? Indicators of wetland hydrology present?If yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) X X Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Thin Muck Surface (C7) 2%Long.: No Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Soil Map Unit Name:Santiago silt loam Lat.: High Water Table (A2) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Marl Deposits (B15) 6/16/17Sampling Date:Old Marine Tr N - Long Lake Dan Manthey 8-WETSampling Point:MN Project/Site:City/County: Applicant/Owner:State: Scandia Investigator(s):CMC Section, Township, Range: Datum: Sec. 27, T32N, R20W (If no, explain in remarks) Are "normal circumstances" present? Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Local relief (concave, convex, none):depression Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Y Y Y Other (Explain in Remarks) Water Marks (B1) Saturation (A3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Drift Deposits (B3) Sediment Deposits (B2) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Northcentral and Northeast Region 4 Yes X According to three month antecedent precipitation data, sampling was conducted during wetter than normal climate conditions Y X HYDROLOGY No Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) No Indicators of wetland hydrology present?Y Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) PUBF concave Drainage Patterns (B10) No Moss Trim Lines (B16) (includes capillary fringe) Field Observations: Surface water present? Water table present? Saturation present? Depth (inches):Yes Depth (inches):1 Shallow Aquitard (D3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Yes X -Depth (inches): US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region N N N N NN 50/20 Thresholds Tree Stratum 1 Sapling/Shrub Stratum 2 Herb Stratum 3 Woody Vine Stratum 4 5 Dominance Test Worksheet 6 7 8 (A) 9 10 (B) =Total Cover (A/B) 1 Prevalence Index Worksheet 2 Total % Cover of: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = 6 FACU species x 4 = 7 UPL species x 5 = 8 Column totals (A)(B) 9 Prevalence Index = B/A = 10 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation X Dominance test is >50% 1 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 =Total Cover 1 2 3 4 5 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) 90% bare ground, leaf litter, and open water at this sample point Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 50%20% 2 3 14 8 35 Sampling Point:8-WETVEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 Indicator Status Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across 70 0 95 0 0 0 10 30' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Woody Vine Stratum Plot Size ( 15 Herb Stratum Plot Size (5' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status Phalaris arundinacea 10 Y FACW Dominant Species Indicator Status Ulmus americana 15 Y FACW 70 Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot Size (15' radius )Absolute % Cover Tree Stratum Plot Size (30' radius 25 Ulmus americana Acer rubrum 0 0 75 140 0 )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status 45 Y Y FACW FAC Y Hydrophytic vegetation present? *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub - Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. 215 4 100.00% 2.26 4 25 5 0 US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B Histic Epipedon (A2)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Black Histic (A3)5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L Stratified Layers (A5)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) X Depleted Below Dark Suface (A11)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Depleted Matrix (F3)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Sandy Redox (S5)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Red Parent Material (F21) Stripped Matrix (S6)Redox Depressions (F8)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Remarks: 100 silty loam silty loam 20-24 10YR5/2 90 7.5YR4/6 10 C PL silty clay loam Type* Redox Features Texture silty loam0-6 10010YR2/1 Sampling Point:8-WETSOIL *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix 7 C PL Depth (Inches) Matrix %Color (moist)Color (moist)%Loc** 10-20 10YR4/2 93 7.5YR4/6 6-10 10YR3/1 Remarks Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, MLRA Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) Depth (inches): YHydric soil present? Hydric Soil Indicators: Type: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Slope (%): NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) Hydrophytic vegetation present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Hydric soil present? Indicators of wetland hydrology present?If yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Moss Trim Lines (B16) (includes capillary fringe) Field Observations: Surface water present? Water table present? Saturation present? Depth (inches):Yes X Depth (inches):>24 Shallow Aquitard (D3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Yes X -Depth (inches): WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Northcentral and Northeast Region >24 Yes According to three month antecedent precipitation data, sampling was conducted during wetter than normal climate conditions N HYDROLOGY No Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) No Indicators of wetland hydrology present?N Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) linear Drainage Patterns (B10) No X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS N N N Other (Explain in Remarks) Water Marks (B1) Saturation (A3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Investigator(s):CMC Section, Township, Range: Datum: Sec. 27, T32N, R20W (If no, explain in remarks) Are "normal circumstances" present? Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Local relief (concave, convex, none):terrace 6/16/17Sampling Date:Old Marine Tr N - Long Lake Dan Manthey 9-UPSampling Point:MN Project/Site:City/County: Applicant/Owner:State: Scandia Thin Muck Surface (C7) 2%Long.: No Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Soil Map Unit Name:Comstock silt loam Lat.: High Water Table (A2) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Marl Deposits (B15) Drift Deposits (B3) Sediment Deposits (B2) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region N N N N NN 50/20 Thresholds Tree Stratum 1 Sapling/Shrub Stratum 2 Herb Stratum 3 Woody Vine Stratum 4 5 Dominance Test Worksheet 6 7 8 (A) 9 10 (B) =Total Cover (A/B) 1 Prevalence Index Worksheet 2 Total % Cover of: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = 6 FACU species x 4 = 7 UPL species x 5 = 8 Column totals (A)(B) 9 Prevalence Index = B/A = 10 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation Dominance test is >50% 1 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 =Total Cover 1 2 3 4 5 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) N Hydrophytic vegetation present? *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub - Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. 415 2 33.33% 3.77 6 35 25 0 Tree Stratum Plot Size (30' radius 25 Acer rubrum Betula papyrifera 150 140 105 20 0 )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status 35 Y Y FAC FACU 60 Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot Size (15' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status 0 Herb Stratum Plot Size (5' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status Bromus inermis 20 Y UPL Phalaris arundinacea 10 Y FACW Carex pennsylvanica 10 Y UPL 10 Y FACUParthenocissus quinquefolia Woody Vine Stratum Plot Size ( 30' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species 0 50 Sampling Point:9-UPVEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 Indicator Status Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across 10 0 110 30 35 45% bare ground and leaf litter at this sample point Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 50%20% 10 0 12 0 30 US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B Histic Epipedon (A2)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Black Histic (A3)5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L Stratified Layers (A5)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Depleted Below Dark Suface (A11)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Depleted Matrix (F3)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Sandy Redox (S5)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Red Parent Material (F21) Stripped Matrix (S6)Redox Depressions (F8)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Remarks: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, MLRA Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) Depth (inches): NHydric soil present? Hydric Soil Indicators: Type: Sampling Point:9-UPSOIL *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Depth (Inches) Matrix %Color (moist)Color (moist)%Loc** 12-24 10YR5/3 100 8-12 10YR4/3 RemarksType* Redox Features Texture sandy loam0-8 10010YR3/2 100 silt loam silt loam US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Slope (%): NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) Hydrophytic vegetation present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Hydric soil present? Indicators of wetland hydrology present?If yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) X X X Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Thin Muck Surface (C7) 2%Long.: No Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Soil Map Unit Name:Comstock silt loam Lat.: High Water Table (A2) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Marl Deposits (B15) 6/16/17Sampling Date:Old Marine Tr N - Long Lake Dan Manthey 9-WETSampling Point:MN Project/Site:City/County: Applicant/Owner:State: Scandia Investigator(s):CMC Section, Township, Range: Datum: Sec. 27, T32N, R20W (If no, explain in remarks) Are "normal circumstances" present? Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Local relief (concave, convex, none):slope Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Y Y Y Other (Explain in Remarks) Water Marks (B1) Saturation (A3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Drift Deposits (B3) Sediment Deposits (B2) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Northcentral and Northeast Region >24 Yes X According to three month antecedent precipitation data, sampling was conducted during wetter than normal climate conditions Y HYDROLOGY No Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) No Indicators of wetland hydrology present?Y Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) PEM1A/Bd linear Drainage Patterns (B10) No Moss Trim Lines (B16) (includes capillary fringe) Field Observations: Surface water present? Water table present? Saturation present? Depth (inches):Yes X Depth (inches):10 Shallow Aquitard (D3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Yes X -Depth (inches): US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region N N N N NN 50/20 Thresholds Tree Stratum 1 Sapling/Shrub Stratum 2 Herb Stratum 3 Woody Vine Stratum 4 5 Dominance Test Worksheet 6 7 8 (A) 9 10 (B) =Total Cover (A/B) 1 Prevalence Index Worksheet 2 Total % Cover of: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = 6 FACU species x 4 = 7 UPL species x 5 = 8 Column totals (A)(B) 9 Prevalence Index = B/A = 10 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation X Dominance test is >50% 1 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 =Total Cover 1 2 3 4 5 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 50%20% 19 2 2 5 5 Sampling Point:9-WETVEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 Indicator Status Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across 100 5 115 0 0 0 95 30' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Woody Vine Stratum Plot Size ( Carex stricta 5 N OBL 10 Herb Stratum Plot Size (5' radius )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status Phalaris arundinacea 90 Y FACW Dominant Species Indicator Status Ulmus americana 10 Y FACW 10 Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot Size (15' radius )Absolute % Cover Tree Stratum Plot Size (30' radius Acer rubrum 0 0 30 200 5 )Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Status 10 Y FAC Y Hydrophytic vegetation present? *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub - Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. 235 3 100.00% 2.04 3 10 48 0 US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B Histic Epipedon (A2)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Black Histic (A3)5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L Stratified Layers (A5)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) X Depleted Below Dark Suface (A11)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Depleted Matrix (F3)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Sandy Redox (S5)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Red Parent Material (F21) Stripped Matrix (S6)Redox Depressions (F8)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Remarks: 98 7.5YR4/6 silty clay loam PL silty loam Type* Redox Features Texture sandy loam0-6 10010YR2/1 Sampling Point:9-WETSOIL *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix 4 C PL Depth (Inches) Matrix %Color (moist)Color (moist)%Loc** 10-24 10YR4/2 96 7.5YR4/6 6-10 10YR3/1 Remarks 2 C Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, MLRA Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) Depth (inches): YHydric soil present? Hydric Soil Indicators: Type: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region APPENDIX C Site Photographs Sample point 2-UP Sample point 2-WET Sample point 3-1 UP Sample point 3-1 WET Sample point 3-2 UP Sample point 3-2 WET Sample point 4-UP Sample point 4-WET Sample point 5-UP Sample point 5-WET Sample point 6-UP Sample point 6-WET Basin 1 Basin 2 Basin 3 Basin 3 Basin 4 Basin 5 Basin 6 Basin 8 APPENDIX D Wetland Delineation Approval Forms Project Name and/or Number: PART ONE: Applicant Information If applicant is an entity (company, government entity, partnership, etc.), an authorized contact person must be identified. If the applicant is using an agent (consultant, lawyer, or other third party) and has authorized them to act on their behalf , the agent’s contact information must also be provided. Applicant/Landowner Name: Daniel Manthey Mailing Address: Phone: E-mail Address: Bluehair01@hotmail.com Authorized Contact (do not complete if same as above): Milo Horak, Landmark Surveying Inc. Mailing Address: PO Box 65, Scandia, MN 55073 Phone: 651-433-3421 E-mail Address: inthefield@frontier.net Agent Name: Wayne Jacobson, WPC, PSS, Jacobson Environmental Mailing Address: 5821 Humboldt Ave N, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Phone: (612) 802-6619 E-mail Address: jacobsonenv@msn.com PART TWO: Site Location Information County: Washington City/Township: Scandia Parcel ID and/or Address: 27.032.20.44.0003 Legal Description (Section, Township, Range): Section 27, T32N, R20W Lat/Long (decimal degrees): Attach a map showing the location of the site in relation to local streets, roads, highways. See Figure 1 Approximate size of site (acres) or if a linear project, length (feet): 27.59 acres If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you must provide the names and addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to your application or by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at: http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Portals/57/docs/regulatory/RegulatoryDocs/engform_4345_2012oct.pdf PART THREE: General Project/Site Information If this application is related to a delineation approval, exemption determination, jurisdictional determination, or other correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number. Describe the project that is being proposed, the project purpose and need, and schedule for implementation and completion. The project description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements that effect aquatic resources (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings showing the location, character, and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts. Subdivide property Project Name and/or Number: PART FOUR: Aquatic Resource Impact1 Summary If your proposed project involves a direct or indirect impact to an aquatic resource (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) identify each impact in the table below. Include all anticipated impacts, including those expected to be temporary. Attach an overhead view map, aerial photo, and/or drawing showing all of the aquatic resources in the project area and the location(s) of the proposed impacts. Label each aquatic resource on the map with a reference number or letter and identify the impacts in the following table. Aquatic Resource ID (as noted on overhead view) Aquatic Resource Type (wetland, lake, tributary etc.) Type of Impact (fill, excavate, drain, or remove vegetation) Duration of Impact Permanent (P) or Temporary (T)1 Size of Impact2 Overall Size of Aquatic Resource 3 Existing Plant Community Type(s) in Impact Area4 County, Major Watershed #, and Bank Service Area # of Impact Area5 1If impacts are temporary; enter the duration of the impacts in days next to the “T”. For example, a project with a temporary access fill that would be removed after 220 days would be entered “T (220)”. 2Impacts less than 0.01 acre should be reported in square feet. Impacts 0.01 acre or greater should be reported as acres and rounded to the nearest 0.01 acre. Tributary impacts must be reported in linear feet of impact and an area of impact by indicating first the linear feet of impact along the flowline of the stream followed by the area impact in parentheses). For example, a project that impacts 50 feet of a stream that is 6 feet wide would be reported as 50 ft (300 square feet). 3This is generally only applicable if you are applying for a de minimis exemption under MN Rules 8420.0420 Subp. 8, otherwise enter “N/A”. 4Use Wetland Plants and Plant Community Types of Minnesota and Wisconsin 3rd Ed. as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp. 2. 5Refer to Major Watershed and Bank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp. 7. If any of the above identified impacts have already occurred, identify which impacts they are and the circumstances associated with each: PART FIVE: Applicant Signature Check here if you are requesting a pre-application consultation with the Corps and LGU based on the information you have provided. Regulatory entities will not initiate a formal application review if this box is checked. By signature below, I attest that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further attest that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein. Signature: Date: I hereby authorize Wayne Jacobson to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this application. 1 The term “impact” as used in this joint application form is a generic term used for disclosure purposes to identify activities that may require approval from one or more regulatory agencies. For purposes of this form it is not meant to indicate whether or not those activities may require mitigation/replacement. Project Name and/or Number: Attachment A Request for Delineation Review, Wetland Type Determination, or Jurisdictional Determination By submission of the enclosed wetland delineation report, I am requesting that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District (Corps) and/or the Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit (LGU) provide me with the following (check all that apply): Wetland Type Confirmation Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with a delineation is a written notification from the Corps and a decision from the LGU concurring, not concurring, or commenting on the boundaries of the aqu atic resources delineated on the property. Delineation concurrences are generally valid for five years unless site conditions change. Under this request alone, the Corps will not a ddress the jurisdictional status of the aquatic resources on the property, only the boundaries of the resources within the review area (including wetlands, tributaries, lakes, etc.). Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination. A preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) is a non-binding written indication from the Corps that waters, including wetlands, identified on a parcel may be waters of the United States. For purposes of computation of impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements, a permit decision made on the basis of a PJD will treat all waters and wetlands in the review area as if they are jurisdictional waters o f the U.S. PJDs are advisory in nature and may not be appealed. Approved Jurisdictional Determination. An approved jurisdictional determination (AJD) is an official Corps determination that jurisdictional waters of the United States are either present or absent on the property. AJDs can generally be relied upon by the affected party for five years. An AJD may be appealed through the Corps administrative appeal process. In order for the Corps and LGU to process your request, the wetland delineation must be prep ared in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual, and the Guidelines for Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota (2013). http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/DelineationJDGuidance.aspx X X X