6.c PC Resolution No. 2021-16_Gunst Variance
CITY OF SCANDIA, MINNESOTA
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2021-16
DENYING A VARIANCE FOR PARCEL 28.032.20.34.0013
LOCATED AT 19211 MEADOWRIDGE LANE NORTH
WHEREAS, Brian Gunst has made an application for a variance to build an addition
located 6.8 feet from the north side or rear setback line, on property identified as PID
28.032.20.34.0013; and
WHEREAS, the property is legally described as follows:
LOT 1, BLOCK 8, TII GAVO, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request for variances at a duly
noticed Public Hearing on September 7, 2021, and recommended that the City Council deny the
variances;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SCANDIA, WASHINGTON COUNTY,
MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does recommend that the City Council deny a variance
to build an addition at a setback of 6.8 feet from the rear lot line at 19211 Meadowridge Lane
North, based on the following findings:
1. The Comprehensive Plan does have an objective in the Land Use section to “conduct
development in a manner that is sensitive to the impact upon natural features and to
environmental constraints, including but not limited to scenic views, surface water,
wetlands, slopes, woodlands, vegetation, drainage ways, shorelands, and flood plain
areas”. The proposed addition, by extending to the north instead of west on the parcel,
would avoid existing wooded areas on the lot. The request appears to be in general
harmony with the Comprehensive Plan and Development Code.
2. The current use of the property is for a single-family residence, which would not
change if this variance request is approved. Proposing to continue to use the property
for residential use is a reasonable use.
3. The practical difficulties as noted by the applicant are primarily due to the existing
location of the house, which while not being the first choice of the landowner was the
eventual location that the house was built at. The difficulties arising from the existing
location not allowing for a 34.5 foot deep addition are caused by the landowner. The
buildable area on the lot available to the landowner to build on would still permit
additions that do not require variances, which is not a unique difficulty. The practical
difficulties of the existing house location were caused by the current landowner and
are not unique to the property.
PC Resolution No.: 2021-16
Page 2 of 2
4. The use and function of the property would remain residential, as is the use of other
nearby lots in the area. The addition would be much closer to the rear lot line than
nearby homes, though existing trees and vegetation would cut down on the visibility
of the addition from the right-of-way or other lots. Granting the variances would not
alter the essential character of the area.
5. The practical difficulties are related to the existing location of the house. The
practical difficulties are not only economic in nature.
6. Granting the requested variances would not result in limiting light or air to
neighboring properties. The land use will not change, so increases to congestion, fire
danger, or public safety are not expected. The property values of neighboring values
should not be negatively impacted, either, if the request is granted. The requested
variance will not impair the supply of light or air to adjacent properties, increase
congestion, endanger the public, or substantially diminish or impair property values
in the neighborhood.
7. The current location of the house is meeting the required setbacks. The proposed
addition could meet setbacks as well if located elsewhere on the lot, or reduced in
size. The requested variance is not the minimum action required to eliminate the
practical difficulty.
8. The variance is not related to a need for direct sunlight for solar energy systems.
Adopted by the Scandia Planning Commission this 7th day of September, 2021.
_________________________________
Travis Loeffler, Chair
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Ken Cammilleri, City Administrator